Republic of the Philippines

Laguna State Polytechnic University

Province of Laguna

GEC 103: The Contemporary World

Module 2: The Global Interstate System

Assignment #5: Reflection

Submitted by:
Leron, Jennylyn Xyrrielle D.
1st Year Mathematics Major

Submitted to:
Prof. Bryant Bennet Atencia
March 5, 2024
Reflection
“When to Intervene Forcibly in Interstate Relations, a Conversation with Prof. Michael
Doyle”

The deep advancement of concepts and conventions surrounding international

intervention—particularly in the midst of humanitarian crises and conflicts—was examined in
the conversation with Michael Doyle. The conversation skillfully navigated historical views,
ranging from the time of John Stuart Mill to contemporary discussions including the
development of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) philosophy and the UN General Assembly
statement of 2005. I became rather interested in the complex topics that were covered, such as
how to strike a balance between the rights to self-determination, humanitarian protection, and
national security.

A thorough evaluation of interference in international politics was presented during the

discussion. The discussion also brought attention to continued difficulties and constraints, even
though frameworks and standards like the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) have been
established to handle humanitarian emergencies while upholding state sovereignty. Notably,
the emphasis on governments' unwillingness to assist and the possibility of abusing
intervention powers highlighted the complexity of international relations, where progress is
frequently accompanied by failures.

Examining the conversation reveals similarities to "The Global Interstate System," a

theoretical construct that describes the intricate connections between independent governments
all across the world. Important ideas that are highly relevant to both the interview and the global
interstate system include state sovereignty, power balance, and the function of international
organizations like the UN. The way that intervention rules have changed over time is reflective
of more general changes in how states manage their relationships and address common issues
in this dynamic system.

In conclusion, the interview made clear how dynamic the international system of states
is as well as how international relations norms and practices are constantly changing. It
emphasized the necessity of striking a balance between national sovereignty and humanitarian
considerations, as well as the difficulties in doing so. The interview was a devastating reminder
of the complexity of modern international relations by providing insightful information about
the specifics of engagement in global events and its effects on the larger global interstate
system.
Reflection
“Introduction to Inter State Arbitration”

Upon exploring the comprehensive explanation offered in the video, I couldn't resist
feeling hopeful regarding the function of interstate arbitration in promoting international
harmony and collaboration. The conversation covered the history of arbitration from
prehistoric times to the present, highlighting the importance of arbitration in settling disputes
over land and the environment.

The recent ruling by the Court of Arbitration addressing the border dispute between
Sudan and Ethiopia was one notable case that was emphasized in the movie. This case
demonstrated the applicability of arbitration in the modern world and how well it may offer a
framework of law for settling intricate conflicts between states.

Interstate arbitration has become an important means of resolving disputes because it

provides a careful balance between state sovereignty and legal judgment. States are
increasingly using it as a preferred means of resolving conflicts because of its adaptability and
flexibility.

Further investigation revealed that interstate arbitration reflects how the international
interstate system is changing. In a time when legal frameworks for conflict resolution and
cooperative governance are becoming more prevalent, arbitration offers a forum for
governments to settle disagreements amicably while retaining their independence.

The possibilities for interstate arbitration seem bright when looking ahead. It is
positioned as a practical strategy for handling disputes and promoting collaboration on a
worldwide scale due to its capacity to consider the various interests and sovereignty concerns
of states.

It is essential to encourage the use of interstate arbitration as a preferred dispute

resolution process in order to guarantee its ongoing success. This could mean encouraging
communication and collaboration within international legal frameworks as well as raising state
awareness and comprehension of arbitration procedures.

Furthermore, the video's explanations, which emphasize the value of legal procedures
and collaboration in resolving disputes within the international community, are a great fit with
the tenets of the Global Interstate System. Interstate arbitration provides hope for a future when
nations work together more peacefully and cooperatively within the difficult geopolitical
landscape.