I.

INTRODUCTION

Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) is a bank that specializes in providing financial services to
technology and life science companies, as well as venture capital and private equity
firms. The bank was founded in 1983 by a group of entrepreneurs in Santa Clara,
California, who were frustrated with the traditional banking industry's lack of
understanding and support for their high-growth, high-risk businesses. SVB has since
grown to become one of the most prominent banks in the innovation economy, with
offices across the United States and around the world.

In 2023, the collapse of SVB (Silicon Valley Bank) sent shockwaves through the
financial market, highlighting the complex and interconnected nature of banking risks.
SVB's downfall was rooted in a combination of factors, primarily centered around its
heavy investment in government bonds.

While government bonds are traditionally considered a safe asset class, SVB's
concentration risk was exacerbated by several factors. First, SVB had an unusually large
exposure to government bonds, making it vulnerable to shifts in interest rates. When
interest rates rose unexpectedly, the market value of these bonds declined, resulting in
substantial losses for the bank.

Furthermore, SVB's overreliance on government bonds left it exposed to liquidity risk. In

times of crisis, liquidity can dry up quickly, making it difficult for the bank to meet its
obligations, leading to a downward spiral.

Lastly, concentration risk meant that SVB lacked diversification in its portfolio. A single
asset class, no matter how safe, can still carry significant risk if not balanced with a
diversified investment strategy.

In essence, SVB's collapse serves as a stark reminder that even seemingly safe
investments can become perilous when risks are not adequately managed. The financial
world learned that diversification, prudent risk management, and vigilance are essential,
regardless of the asset class a bank chooses to focus on.

II. Why SVB bank collapsed

1. Key Risks Faced by SVB:

1.1 Interest Rate Risk (Market Risk)
Interest rate risk is the potential for investment losses that can be triggered by a move
upward in the prevailing rates for new debt instruments .
This type of risk occurs when fluctuations in interest rates impact the value of a bank's
assets and liabilgities, and SVB was particularly vulnerable to this due to its extensive
investments in overnment bonds.
When the Federal Reserve adopted a hawkish policy and raised interest rates, it triggered
a chain reaction in the financial markets. As interest rates rise, the market value of
existing bonds, including government bonds, tends to decrease. This phenomenon is a
fundamental aspect of bond pricing; as yields on new bonds increase, the value of
existing bonds with lower yields falls.
For SVB, which had allocated a substantial portion of its assets into government bonds,
this meant potential capital losses. As the value of these bonds declined, the bank faced
the risk of substantial financial losses. These capital losses would not only erode SVB's
net worth but also threaten its overall financial stability.
Furthermore, the impact of interest rate risk extends beyond immediate losses. It can also
affect a bank's ability to generate income from its bond portfolio, as the lower bond
values can result in reduced interest income.
In essence, SVB's exposure to interest rate risk illustrates the importance of banks
diversifying their investment portfolios and implementing robust risk management
strategies to mitigate the potential negative effects of interest rate fluctuations on their
financial health and stability.

1.2. Liquidity Risk:

Liquidity risk refers to the potential difficulty an entity may face in meeting its short-term
financial obligations due to an inability to convert assets into cash without incurring a sub
stantial loss.

Liquidity Risk emerged as a critical factor contributing to SVB's collapse in 2023. The
bank's rapid deposit growth from $60 billion in the first quarter of 2020 to $175 billion by
the end of 2022 was a testament to its success in attracting funds. However, this growth
also brought with it significant liquidity challenges.

While government bonds are generally regarded as liquid assets due to their
marketability, the timing and terms of their sale may not always align with a bank's
immediate liquidity needs. This disconnect can result in liquidity risk, especially in a fast-
changing financial landscape.

For SVB, the danger lay in the potential need to convert these government bonds into
cash quickly. When faced with a liquidity crunch, the bank might have to sell these bonds
in a market where prices were depressed due to rising interest rates. Selling at a discount
could lead to substantial losses, further eroding SVB's financial stability.

Moreover, the sheer size of SVB's bond portfolio could exacerbate the liquidity risk. The
market might not absorb such a significant volume of bonds swiftly, making it even more
challenging for the bank to meet its obligations.
In essence, SVB's liquidity risk highlighted the importance of maintaining a balance
between asset growth and liquidity management. Rapid deposit expansion, when not
complemented by a matching increase in readily available cash or near-cash assets, can
expose a bank to severe liquidity challenges, potentially resulting in financial distress.
Effective liquidity risk management is crucial for banks to ensure they can meet their
short-term obligations, even in times of unexpected stres

1.3. Concentration Risk

Concentration risk is the potential for a loss in value of an investment portfolio or a
financial institution when an individual or group of exposures move together in an
unfavorable direction
Concentration Risk loomed ominously over SVB and played a pivotal role in its
catastrophic collapse in 2023. The bank's allocation of approximately 42% of its assets
into a single asset class, notably U.S. government bonds, exposed it to a perilous degree
of concentration risk. While U.S. government bonds are generally considered safe,
concentration risk materializes when a substantial portion of a bank's assets is tethered to
a single type of investment. The consequences of this risk were painfully evident in
SVB's downfall.

The inherent danger lay in the fact that SVB's fortunes were heavily intertwined with the
performance of government bonds. Despite their reputation for safety, government bonds
are not immune to fluctuations in value, especially in a dynamic economic environment.
A sudden adverse movement in bond prices, which could result from changes in interest
rates or market conditions, had the potential to severely impact the bank's overall
financial health.

SVB's overreliance on government bonds left it vulnerable to external shocks. A

downturn in the bond market, for instance, could have led to significant capital losses and
eroded the bank's net worth. This, in turn, could have triggered a domino effect,
potentially impacting SVB's ability to meet its obligations and, ultimately, threatening its
solvency.

In essence, SVB's harrowing experience serves as a stark reminder of the dangers

associated with concentration risk. Prudent risk management dictates that banks should
diversify their investment portfolios to mitigate the impact of adverse events in any single
asset class. By failing to do so, SVB became a cautionary tale in the world of finance,
highlighting the imperative of diversification to safeguard financial institutions against
unforeseen challenges.

2. Factors Contributing to SVB's Collapse:

2.1 Magnitude of Interest Rate Changes:

The magnitude of interest rate changes proved to be a critical factor in SVB's unfortunate
collapse in 2023. The bank, despite its focus on seemingly safe government bonds, faced
a significant challenge in anticipating and preparing for the scale of interest rate
fluctuations that unfolded.

Government bonds are typically regarded as safe investments, but their value is
intricately linked to prevailing interest rates. When interest rates rise significantly and
rapidly, as can occur due to shifts in monetary policy or economic.

2.2 Liquidity Mismatch:

Deposits may surge unpredictably, and the bank's ability to deploy these funds into
longer-term assets, such as loans or investments, might not synchronize with this influx.
If SVB faces sudden and significant demands for withdrawals or funding needs while a
substantial portion of its assets remains locked in illiquid investments, it becomes
susceptible to liquidity mismatches.

2.3 . Overreliance on Government Bonds

Overreliance on Government Bonds emerged as a critical factor in SVB's dramatic

collapse, serving as a stark reminder that even assets perceived as highly liquid and safe
can harbor hidden risks. In SVB's case, this overreliance on a single asset class, despite
its perception as a secure investment, exposed the bank to concentration risk—a perilous
vulnerability that became painfully evident when faced with sudden market fluctuations.

U.S. government bonds, renowned for their liquidity and typically viewed as low-risk
assets, had long been considered a cornerstone of SVB's investment strategy. However,
this reliance on a single asset class represented a dangerous lack of diversification. Even
assets as seemingly safe as government bonds are not immune to the vagaries of financial
markets.

A key vulnerability lay in the fact that the value of government bonds is intrinsically tied
to interest rates. When interest rates rise, as can occur due to shifts in monetary policy or
broader economic conditions, the market value of existing bonds tends to decline. The
inverse relationship between bond prices and interest rates became a harbinger of doom
for SVB.
If interest rates were to surge unexpectedly, SVB's extensive holdings of government
bonds would have been exposed to substantial losses, thereby eroding the bank's capital
base. Such losses can have far-reaching consequences, compromising the bank's financial
stability and its ability to meet obligations to depositors and creditors.

Additionally, market dynamics can change swiftly. The once-steady and reliable
performance of government bonds can be disrupted by external factors, such as shifts in
investor sentiment, geopolitical events, or economic crises. Such changes can lead to
heightened market volatility and pose a significant threat to a bank's investment portfolio.

In sum, SVB's dramatic downfall serves as a poignant illustration of the dangers

associated with an overreliance on a single asset class, no matter how secure it may
appear. It underscores the imperative for financial institutions to diversify their portfolios
and manage concentration risk effectively. Prudent risk management demands a balanced
and diversified approach to investments, even when dealing with seemingly safe assets
like government bonds, to safeguard against unexpected market fluctuations and maintain
long-term financial stability.

III. SUMMARY
In summary, SVB's dramatic collapse in 2023 serves as a stark and cautionary tale for the
financial industry, highlighting the inherent risks that even seemingly safe asset classes
can harbor. The bank's demise underscores the critical importance of holistic risk
management, as it found itself ensnared in a web of interest rate risk, liquidity risk, and
concentration risk.

First and foremost, SVB's vulnerability to interest rate risk became acutely apparent.
Although the bank had heavily invested in government bonds, a sudden and substantial
increase in interest rates caught it off guard. The resultant drop in bond prices led to
capital losses, jeopardizing SVB's financial stability and overall solvency.

Secondly, the bank's rapid deposit growth, while initially a testament to its success,
exposed it to liquidity risk. The pace at which deposits poured in may have outpaced
SVB's ability to efficiently deploy those funds, resulting in liquidity mismatches that
could have triggered liquidity issues, particularly if a sudden wave of withdrawals
occurred.

Lastly, the overreliance on government bonds showcased concentration risk. Even assets
considered safe can become precarious if they represent a substantial portion of a bank's
portfolio. In SVB's case, this concentration left it vulnerable to adverse changes in bond
prices and market dynamics.

The specific circumstances surrounding SVB's collapse, such as the speed and magnitude
of interest rate changes and the bank's ability to manage rapid deposit growth, were likely
pivotal factors in its unexpected downfall. The confluence of these risks, combined with
the bank's inability to effectively mitigate them, culminated in a crisis that reverberated
throughout the financial industry.

Ultimately, SVB's demise serves as a stark reminder that prudent risk management,
diversification of assets, and an astute understanding of the complex interplay between
different risks are essential for the long-term stability and resilience of financial
institutions, regardless of the perceived safety of their chosen asset classes.

REFERRENCE

1. Chen, J. (no date) Interest rate risk definition and impact on bond prices, Investopedia.
Available at: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/interestraterisk.asp (Accessed: 27
October 2023).
2. Hayes, A. (no date) Understanding liquidity ratios: Types and their importance,
Investopedia. Available at: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/liquidityratios.asp
(Accessed: 27 October 2023).
3. Concentration risk - investment portfolio, portfolio management (no date) Investment
Portfolio, Portfolio Management - MATLAB & Simulink. Available at:
https://www.mathworks.com/discovery/concentration-risk.html (Accessed: 27 October
2023).
4. (No date) Annual report 2020 - amazon web services, inc.. Available at: https://s3-us-
west-2.amazonaws.com/ungc-production/attachments/cop_2020/488887/original/
200915_BHPAnnualReport2020.pdf?1600159676 (Accessed: 27 October 2023).
5. (No date a) *GPGTCN - amazon web services, inc.. Available at: https://s3-us-west-
2.amazonaws.com/ungc-production/attachments/cop_2020/486426/original/
Ecovadis_Survey_Full_6_03_2020.pdf?1591177210 (Accessed: 27 October 2023).
6. Best selling books by Gilad James (no date) Aboutread. Available at:
https://aboutread.com/author/Gilad+James?Order=BestSelling&page=2 (Accessed: 27
October 2023).
7. PYMNTS.com (2023) The Silicon Valley Bank story no one has told, Pymnts.com.
Available at: https://www.pymnts.com/news/fintech-investments/2023/the-silicon-valley-
bank-story-no-one-has-told/ (Accessed: 28 October 2023).
8. Lee, C.-M. (no date) The Silicon Valley Edge: A habitat for innovation and
entrepreneurship, Google Books. Available at:
https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Silicon_Valley_Edge.html?
id=eK52augjU98C (Accessed: 28 October 2023).
9. PYMNTS.com (2023a) As Silicon Valley Bank folds, can fintech outrun the bank runs?,
Pymnts.com. Available at: https://www.pymnts.com/digital-first-banking/2023/as-silicon-
valley-bank-folds-can-fintech-outrun-the-bank-runs/ (Accessed: 28 October 2023).