Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2048 of 2022
Applicant :- Sarifuddin (Second Bail)
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy.Homelko Counsel for Applicant :- Rajat Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Anil Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State of U.P., learned counsel for the complainant and perused the record.
The present bail application has been filed on behalf of the
applicant in Case Crime No.0115 of 2021, under Sections 304, 34, 452, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station-Kotwali Dehat, District-Hardoi, with the prayer to enlarge him on bail.
The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the
applicant is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in the case, he is having no previous criminal history and in jail since 15.02.2021. It is further submitted on behalf of applicant that till today only one witness has been examined before the trial court. He further submitted that general allegations have been levelled against all the accused persons. In these circumstances, the applicant is entitled for bail. In case of being enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the complainant
opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the applicant and submitted that accused persons were not cooperating and on 05.04.2022 last opportunity was given for appearance of all the accused persons, and thereafter, charge was framed and due to non cooperation, trial could not be proceeded. They further submitted that accused persons assaulted the blind person, therefore, applicant is not entitled for bail.
Considering the rival submissions of learned counsel for the
parties and going through the contents of FIR, other relevant documents as well as statement of P.W.1, I find no good ground to grant of bail to the applicant.
Accordingly, the bail application is hereby rejected.
Trial court is directed to conclude the trial of the present case
within a period of one year without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. Office is directed to communicate this order to the trial court, forthwith.