International Journal of Advanced Technology and Social Sciences (IJATSS)

Vol.1, No.3, 2023: 185-196

Assessing the Feasibility and Implications of Implementing One

Nation One Election in India
Aarif Mohd Waza
SRTMUN Maharashtra
Corresponding Author: Aarif Mohd waza aarifwaza4@gmail.com
ARTICLEINFO ABSTRACT
Keywords: Democratic Principles, This research focuses on evaluating the feasibility and
Political Parties, Constitutional implications of implementing the One Nation One
Aspect, Implementation, Policy Election initiative in India. The study examines the
Makers, Election Commission advantages and challenges of conducting
simultaneous elections at all levels of government,
Received : 3 October
including its potential impact on democratic
Revised : 18 October
Accepted: 20 November principles, political parties, and voter behaviour. The
research also analyses the legal and constitutional
©2023 Waza: This is an open-access aspects of this initiative and explores the practical
article distributed under the terms of the considerations involved in its implementation, such as
Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 coordinating election schedules and deploying
Internasional.
resources effectively. The findings of this study
provide valuable insights into the potential benefits
and drawbacks of One Nation One Election, and offer
recommendations for policymakers and stakeholders
to consider when evaluating its feasibility

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59890/ijatss.v1i3.694 185

( https://journal.multitechpublisher.com/index.php/ijatts
Waza

INTRODUCTION
One Nation One Election (ONOE) is a plan to hold all elections in India at
the same time, including for the Lok Sabha, state assemblies, and local bodies.
The aim is to save money and time, which is currently a big burden on the
government. ONOE can also improve governance as elected representatives will
have more time to work instead of being busy with election-related activities. It
can also reduce the time taken to conduct elections, which can last for months in
India.
ONOE can also reduce the expenditure incurred by political parties
during election campaigns. This can lead to a level playing field for all parties
and prevent the use of black money in elections. Moreover, it can help the
government focus on important issues such as development and governance
instead of constantly preparing for elections. It can also reduce the burden on
security forces, which are currently deployed in large numbers during elections.
However, implementing ONOE requires careful consideration of political
factors. Political parties may be hesitant to give up their regional power in
elections. Also, smaller parties may find it difficult to spread their resources
across the country. The Election Commission of India (ECI) will also have a
massive task of conducting multiple elections at different levels. The political
environment of the country also plays a critical role in determining the feasibility
of ONOE.
In conclusion, ONOE has the potential to bring significant changes to the
electoral process in India. But its implementation requires careful consideration
of political factors and extensive consultation with all stakeholders.

LITERATURE REVIEW
Significance and Advantages of One Nation One Election:
Significance:
The One Nation One Election (ONOE) Initiative aims to conduct all
elections in India simultaneously, including those for the Lok Sabha, state
assemblies, and local bodies. The primary objective of this concept is to reduce
the cost and time involved in conducting elections, which currently places a
significant financial burden on the government.
The significance of ONOE lies in its potential to ensure better governance as
elected representatives would have more time to focus on their work rather than
being preoccupied with election-related activities. It would also lead to a
reduction in the time taken to conduct elections, which can last for months in
India.
Another significant advantage of ONOE is that it would reduce the
expenditure incurred by political parties during election campaigns. This would
lead to a level playing field for all parties and prevent the use of black money in
elections.

186
 International Journal of Advanced Technology and Social Sciences (IJATSS)
Vol.1, No.3, 2023:185-196

Furthermore, ONOE would enable the government to focus on important

issues such as development and governance rather than constantly preparing for
elections. It would also reduce the burden on security forces, which are currently
deployed in large numbers during elections.

Advantages:
1. Cost-effective: Conducting elections simultaneously will lead to a reduction in
the cost involved in conducting elections. The government will save a
considerable amount of money that can be utilized for other important issues
such as development and welfare schemes.
2. Time-saving: Conducting elections simultaneously will reduce the time taken
to conduct elections, which can last for months in India. This will enable elected
representatives to focus on their work rather than being preoccupied with
election-related activities such as campaigning.
3. Better governance: With more time to focus on their work, elected
representatives will be able to provide better governance to their constituents.
They will have more time to understand the issues affecting their constituencies
and work towards addressing them.
4. Level playing field: Simultaneous elections will lead to a level playing field for
all political parties. This will prevent the use of black money in elections, which
has been a major issue in Indian politics.
5. Focus on development: With less time spent on election-related activities, the
government can focus on important issues such as development and governance.
This will lead to faster implementation of development schemes and better
governance.
6. Reduced burden on security forces: With fewer elections to conduct, the
burden on security forces will be reduced. This will enable them to focus on other
important issues such as maintaining law and order and tackling terrorism.
Overall, the One Nation One Election initiative has the potential to bring about
significant changes in the electoral process in India and improve governance. It
will lead to cost savings, better governance, and a level playing field for all
political parties. Write this in standardized Indian English.

187
Waza

METHODOLOGY
Challenges and Considerations of One Nation, One Election in India:
1. Constitutional and Legal Considerations:
 The Indian Constitution grants autonomy to states in matters of conducting
elections. Amending the constitution to enforce One Nation, One Election
might require careful consideration to balance the idea with existing federal
principles.
 Addressing legal hurdles such as aligning various election schedules, term
lengths, and transition periods for synchronized elections across states and
the central government.
2. Political Party Dynamics and Power Imbalances:
 Implementing One Nation, One Election may have implications for political
parties. Larger, established parties might have an advantage over smaller
or regional parties due to their broader support base and resources.
 Ensuring fairness and a level playing field for all political parties,
particularly in terms of campaign funding and media coverage.
3. Regional Diversities and Grassroots Representation:
 India is a diverse nation with varying regional issues, cultures, and socio-
economic contexts. Conducting synchronized elections raises concerns
about the representation of diverse regional interests, as smaller regions
may feel overshadowed by larger ones.
 Maintaining effective grassroots representation and addressing the needs
of diverse regions and communities within a synchronized election cycle.
4. Relationship Between State and Central Governments:
 Coordinating between the central government and various state
governments to ensure smooth and synchronized elections, considering
potential conflicts of interest, political rivalries, or differing policy
priorities.
 Preserving the constitutional balance of power between the central
government and states while implementing One Nation, One Election.
5. Impact on Democratic Processes:
 Preserving the fundamental principles of democracy, including regular
accountability and periodic elections, while transitioning to a synchronized
election system.
 Ensuring minority representation and safeguarding the rights of
marginalized communities while avoiding the risk of diluting their voices
in a synchronized election cycle.
6. Infrastructure and Administrative Challenges:
 Upgrading and strengthening election infrastructure, including voter
registration systems, polling stations, electronic voting machines (EVMs),

188
 International Journal of Advanced Technology and Social Sciences (IJATSS)
Vol.1, No.3, 2023:185-196

and result tabulation mechanisms, to handle the increased scale and

complexity of synchronized elections.
 Addressing logistical challenges, such as election security, transportation,
and personnel deployment across a vast and diverse country like India.
7. Public Perception and Awareness:
 Generating awareness among the public about the merits and concerns
associated with One Nation, One Election to ensure an informed public
opinion.
 Building consensus among political parties, civil society, and citizens on the
need for synchronized elections and their potential impact on governance
and democracy.
8. Phased Implementation and Transition:
 Developing a phased implementation plan that takes into account the
practicality of transitioning to synchronized elections, considering existing
election schedules and terms of various legislatures.
 Balancing the need for an efficient electoral system with the time required
to address legal and logistical challenges.
Addressing these challenges and considerations will be crucial for the
successful implementation of One Nation, One Election in India. Thorough
analysis, stakeholder consultations, and a balanced approach will be required to
navigate the complexities and ensure democratic principles are upheld while
advancing electoral reforms.

Impact on Democratic Process

One Nation, One Election is a concept that aims to synchronize the
electoral cycles across all levels of governance in a country. In the context of India,
implementing this system would have several implications for the democratic
process. One Nation, One Election will have potential impact on democratic
principles, accountability, voter participation, and political dynamics in India.
1. Preservation of Democratic Principles:
One of the key considerations in adopting One Nation, One Election is to ensure
the preservation of democratic principles. It is essential to maintain regular
electoral accountability and periodic elections as fundamental pillars of
democracy. The synchronized election cycle must not compromise the principles
of free and fair elections, representation, and power-balancing between the
executive and legislature.
2. Voter Participation and Turnout:
One potential positive impact of One Nation, One Election is the potential to
increase voter turnout. With synchronized elections, voters would be required to
participate in multiple elections simultaneously, reducing voter fatigue and the
burden of frequent voting. This may lead to higher engagement and
participation, enhancing the democratic process by ensuring a broader
representation of voices.
3. Efficient Governance and Policy Implementation:
By aligning the election cycles of central and state governments, One Nation, One
Election aims to minimize disruptions to governance. This system can potentially

189
Waza

provide stable and continuous governance, allowing elected representatives to

focus on policy implementation and development. It may lead to better
coordination between different levels of government, streamlining decision-
making processes, and enabling more efficient and effective governance.
4. Impact on Minority Representation:
One potential concern of One Nation, One Election is its impact on minority
representation. Regional or smaller political parties may feel disadvantaged as
larger, national parties dominate the electoral space. Ensuring the protection of
minority rights and interests, along with the fair representation of diverse
communities, is crucial to maintaining democratic principles and avoiding the
marginalization of underrepresented groups.
5. Electoral Integrity and Transparency:
Implementing One Nation, One Election requires robust electoral infrastructure
and systems to ensure the integrity and transparency of the electoral process.
This includes addressing concerns such as electoral fraud, tampering with the
electoral infrastructure, and the need for accurate counting and recording of
votes. The adoption of advanced technologies and stringent safeguards becomes
crucial to maintaining the credibility of the electoral process.
6. Impact on Political Parties and Opposition:
The introduction of One Nation, One Election may have varied impacts on
political parties and the opposition landscape. Smaller parties may face
challenges in gaining visibility and resources when competing with larger,
national parties. This could potentially impact the diversity of political ideologies
and debate within the democratic framework. Striking a balance between
preserving the democratic space for smaller parties and ensuring competitive
politics becomes essential.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

International Perspectives of One Nation, One Election in India:
The concept of One Nation, One Election, proposing simultaneous elections for
all levels of government in India, has drawn attention not only within the country
but also internationally. Here are some key international perspectives on this
electoral reform proposal:
1. Enhanced Political Stability:
Many international observers believe that One Nation, One Election can
lead to enhanced political stability. With synchronized elections, governments at
different levels can focus more on governance, policy-making, and development
instead of being in a perpetual campaign mode.
It is argued that this stability can be attractive to foreign investors and
stakeholders, thus promoting economic growth and stability in the country.

190
 International Journal of Advanced Technology and Social Sciences (IJATSS)
Vol.1, No.3, 2023:185-196

2. Streamlined Governance and Efficiency:

One Nation, One Election is viewed as a means to streamline governance
and boost administrative efficiency. Simultaneous elections can reduce the
frequent disruptions caused by recurrent elections, allowing governments to
have longer periods of uninterrupted governance.
International perspectives highlight that this can lead to better policy
planning, implementation, and coordination, resulting in more effective
governance and decision-making.
3. Potential Cost Savings:
The potential cost savings associated with One Nation, One Election have
garnered international attention. Conducting multiple elections incurs
significant expenses in terms of logistics, security, campaign financing, and
administrative arrangements.
Observers suggest that synchronized elections can help reduce these costs
and enable better utilization of resources, which can be further directed towards
developmental initiatives and public welfare.
4. Concerns Over Democratic Challenges:
Some international perspectives raise concerns regarding the impact of
One Nation, One Election on democratic principles. Critics argue that
synchronized elections may disproportionately benefit larger, national-level
political parties, potentially excluding smaller or regional parties from the
political landscape.
They caution that a one-size-fits-all approach to elections might
undermine the representation of diverse regional interests and dilute the voices
of marginalized communities and minority groups.
5. Complexity and Diversity of India:
International observers often emphasize India’s vast size, regional
diversities, and complex socio-economic dynamics. They highlight that
implementing synchronized elections in a diverse country like India would
require careful consideration of ground realities and taking into account the
specific needs and aspirations of diverse communities.
Perspectives from around the globe stress the importance of developing
a nuanced approach, considering the concerns of various stakeholders and
preserving the democratic fabric of the country.
6. Sharing of Best Practices:
International perspectives on One Nation, One Election in India also
involve the sharing of best practices and experiences from countries that have
successfully implemented synchronized elections.
Examples from countries like Indonesia, South Africa, and Canada, where
synchronized elections have been held at different levels of government, can offer
insights into the challenges faced, the benefits achieved, and the necessary
safeguards required to uphold democratic values.
It is noteworthy that while international perspectives provide valuable
insights into the potential impacts of One Nation, One Election in India, the
decision to adopt this reform ultimately rests with the Indian government and its
citizens. Striking a balance between the advantages of enhanced stability,

191
Waza

efficiency, and cost savings, while addressing concerns over representation and
diverse regional interests, will be crucial in shaping the democratic process and
future of elections in India.

Case Study
The idea of One Nation One Election has been discussed in India for a long
time, but it has not yet been implemented. However, other countries around the
world have adopted this system with different levels of success. Let’s take a look
at some of these countries and their experiences with One Nation One Election.
The United States is one of the earliest adopters of One Nation One Election. The
country conducts its presidential and congressional elections simultaneously
every four years. This system has been successful in reducing the cost of
conducting elections and preventing voter fatigue. However, it has also led to
longer and more intense election campaigns, which can be harmful to
governance.
Brazil is another country that adopted One Nation One Election in 2018.
The country conducted its presidential and congressional elections
simultaneously, which led to a reduction in the cost of conducting elections.
However, the country also saw a rise in fake news and disinformation campaigns
during the election period, which affected the outcome of the elections.
Indonesia is another country that has adopted One Nation One Election. The
country conducts its presidential and parliamentary elections simultaneously
every five years. This system has been successful in reducing the cost of
conducting elections and preventing voter fatigue. However, the country still
faces challenges such as low voter turnout and allegations of vote-buying.
On the other hand, the Philippines attempted to adopt One Nation One Election
in 2022, but it was met with opposition from various political parties and civil
society groups. The opposition argued that the system would favour incumbent
politicians and political dynasties. The proposal was eventually rejected by the
Philippine Congress.
The adoption of One Nation One Election has had different levels of
success in different countries. While it has led to cost savings and prevented voter
fatigue in some countries, it has also led to longer and more intense election
campaigns, as well as challenges such as disinformation campaigns and
allegations of vote-buying. It is important for countries to carefully consider the
pros and cons of this system before adopting it.

192
 International Journal of Advanced Technology and Social Sciences (IJATSS)
Vol.1, No.3, 2023:185-196

Public Opinion and Stakeholder Perspective

One Nation One Election has been a topic of discussion in India for a long
time. The idea is to conduct all elections, be it national, state or local, at the same
time. This will reduce the frequency of elections and the associated costs.
However, people have mixed reactions to this idea.
Many people believe that One Nation One Election is a positive step
towards reducing the frequency of elections. This system will save time and
money, which can be used for other developmental activities. It is also expected
to reduce the influence of money and muscle power in elections, leading to better
governance and policy-making.
However, some people have concerns about the feasibility of this system.
They argue that it will be difficult to synchronize the election schedules of
different states and local bodies. Moreover, they fear that this system may lead
to a concentration of power in the hands of a few political parties, weakening the
democratic fabric of the country.
Different political parties have different views on One Nation One
Election. The ruling party, BJP, supports this system as an opportunity to
consolidate its power across different levels of government. However, opposition
parties have expressed concerns about the potential for rigging and manipulation
of elections by the ruling party.
Civil society groups have also expressed their views on One Nation One Election.
Some have argued that this system may lead to a reduction in voter turnout.
Others have raised concerns about the lack of transparency in the electoral
process, especially in terms of campaign financing.

Implementation Strategies
One Nation One Election is a concept that has been talked about in India
for many years. It means that all elections, whether national, state or local, should
happen at the same time. This will reduce the number of elections and the cost
involved. However, implementing this system needs careful planning and
execution.
There are different ways to implement One Nation One Election. One way
is to do it in phases. This means that the elections will happen in different stages
over time. For example, all Lok Sabha elections could happen first, followed by
all state assembly elections and then all local body elections. This will help
synchronize the election schedules of different states and local bodies.
Another way is to change the Constitution of India through amendments. This
will mean changing the Constitution to make provisions for simultaneous
elections. The Constitution could be amended to provide for a fixed term of five
years for all elected representatives, after which simultaneous elections will be
held.
A strong legal framework is necessary for the successful implementation
of One Nation One Election. The Election Commission of India will need to be
empowered with the necessary legal authority to conduct simultaneous elections.
The legal framework should also provide for the regulation of campaign
financing to ensure transparency in the electoral process.

193
Waza

Technology can play a crucial role in the implementation of One Nation

One Election. The use of technology can help in voter registration, voter
identification, and electronic voting. It can also help in monitoring election
expenses and ensuring compliance with campaign finance regulations.
In conclusion, implementing One Nation One Election requires careful
planning and execution. Different strategies like phased implementation,
constitutional amendments, a strong legal framework, and the use of technology
can be employed. It is important to have a dialogue with all stakeholders to arrive
at a consensus on the feasibility and desirability of this system for India. Any
decision on One Nation One Election must be made with the aim of
strengthening democracy and ensuring the welfare of the people.

Challenges in Moving Forward

One Nation One Election is a concept that has been talked about in India
for many years. The idea is to have all elections, from national to local, at the
same time to save time and money. However, there are many challenges in
implementing this system.
The first challenge is changing the Constitution. The Constitution of India
says that elections should be held every five years. To have One Nation One
Election, we need to change the Constitution to allow for simultaneous elections.
This needs agreement from all political parties, which is hard to do.
The second challenge is organizing simultaneous elections. India is a large
country with many people. We need a lot of resources, like people, electronic
voting machines, and security, to organize all the elections at the same time.
The third challenge is the role of regional parties. India has many regional parties
that represent specific regions or communities. These parties may not support
One Nation One Election because it could reduce their chances of winning. They
may also find it hard to compete with national parties in a simultaneous election.
The fourth challenge is campaign financing. We need a lot of money to campaign
for simultaneous elections. We need to regulate campaign financing to make sure
everything is fair. This is a complex task that needs a good legal framework.
The fifth challenge is technology. Technology can help with One Nation One
Election, but it also has challenges. We need to test electronic voting machines
and make sure they are safe from hackers.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

In conclusion one nation one election can bring significant changes in the
electoral process of India. One nation one election can improve governance, save
time and money, reduce the election campaign expenditure of political parties,
increases the focus on developmental process and can also help the security
forces to focus more or maintaining law and order by reducing the election
security burden.
On the other hand one nation one election in India is not a straight forward
process but have money challenges infront. The major challenges in
implementing one nation one election in India are the political party dynamics of
India, regional diversities, centre state relationship, impact on democratic

194
 International Journal of Advanced Technology and Social Sciences (IJATSS)
Vol.1, No.3, 2023:185-196

process, administrative challenges, public awareness and constitutional and legal

considerations.
Having One Nation One Election in India is not easy. We need agreement
from all political parties, a lot of resources, and good laws. We also need to think
about regional parties, campaign financing, and technology. We need to talk to
everyone involved to decide if this system is good for India.
while One Nation One Election has its advantages, it is important to
consider the potential challenges and concerns associated with this system. It is
essential to engage in a dialogue with all stakeholders to arrive at a consensus on
the feasibility and desirability of this system for India. Any decision on One
Nation One Election must be made with the aim of strengthening democracy and
ensuring the welfare of the people.

FURTHER STUDY
This research still has limitations, so it is necessary to carry out further
research related to the topic Assessing the Feasibility and Implications of
Implementing One Nation One Election in order to improve this research and
add insight to readers.

REFERENCES
Arun Kumar kaushik, Yugank Goyal, The desirability of one nation one election
in India: Simultaneous election, The journal of social, political and
economic studies.
Assaduddin Owaisi ,’ India must reject the one nation one election idea’,
Hindustan Times, March 12th , 2021.
Dr. A. Shaji George, one nation one election: An analysis of pros and cons of
implementing simultaneous election in India, Partners universal
international research journal, 2023.
Dr. Meenakshi Bansal, The concept of one nation one election: An analysis from
India, think Indi
Explained: PM Narendra Modi calls for ‘one nation one election ‘ what does this
idea mean? , India express, Aug 16th ,2019.
Jasmin Nihalani and Srinivasan Ramani, why one nation one election would
strike blow against federalism, The Hindu, 2023.
Nivedha Parthasarathy, one nation one election – a critical analysis, DME journal
of law,2023.
Yousuf Begg, one nation one election? Perish the thought, India Today, June 22th,
2019.

195