Annex A

Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
DILG-NAPOLCOM Center, EDSA corner Quezon Avenue, Quezon City
www.dilg.gov.ph

DILG PHILIPPINE ANTI-ILLEGAL DRUGS STRATEGY -

PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICE

ANTI-DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL

PERFORMANCE AUDIT
PROTOCOL
1.1 As early as 1998, the DILG has encouraged LGUs to organize their respective
ADACs. These multi-sectoral councils are responsible for the formulation of plans,
and the implementation of local anti-drug abuse programs, projects, and activities.
A series of related policies reiterating the organization of local ADACs, and
enumerating their specific roles and responsibilities have likewise been issued,
one of which is Joint Memorandum Circular (JMC) No. 2018-01 between the DILG
and the Dangerous Drugs Board (DDB) which provides for the implementing
guidelines on the functionality, and effectiveness of local ADACs.

1.2 Republic Act No. 9165, or the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002,
embodies the National Government’s commitment to eradicate the country’s illegal
drug problem. Article VII of the same law highlighted the vital participation of Local
Government Units (LGUs) in safeguarding the citizenry from the harmful effects of
dangerous drugs by giving priority to preventive or educational programs, and the
rehabilitation or treatment of drug dependents.

1.3 Chapter 13.1 of the Philippine Development Plan (PDP) 2023-2028 states that,
for the government's efforts to be people-centered, holistic, and human rights
rights-based, and security, it shall promote a holistic approach to counter the
proliferation of illegal and dangerous drugs to ensure peace and security. It further
stresses the importance of a whole-of-nation approach in addressing the problem
of illegal drugs thereby, placing the LGUs and the Department of the Interior and
Local Government (DILG) to be at the forefront of the anti-illegal drugs program.

1.4 The Buhay Ingatan, Droga’y Ayawan (BIDA) Program serves as the umbrella
program of the Department which aims to raise awareness on the adverse effects
of the use of illegal drugs and to recognize the importance of galvanizing the
community, duty-bearers, and stakeholders to take urgent action to protect the
rights of the people by strengthening its efforts on drug use prevention,
rehabilitation, and control; thereby promoting a whole of nation approach to drug
supply and demand reduction. Ultimately, BIDA seeks to improve the quality of life
and safeguard the Filipino people from criminality and the ill effects of drugs in a
manner that is within the framework of law and with respect for human rights.

1.5 To ensure the continuous improvement in the performance of ADACs in the

implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of anti-illegal drug activities, the DILG,
through the Philippine Anti-Illegal Drugs Strategy - Project Management Office
(PADS-PMO), supervised by the Bureau of Local Government Supervision, shall
conduct a Performance Audit covering Provincial, City, and Municipal ADACs.
Further, the results of the ADAC Performance Audit shall serve as one of the
indicators of the Safety, Peace, and Order (SPO) governance area of the Seal of
 Good Local Governance (SGLG) under the requirement of establishing a
functional local Anti-Drug Abuse Council.

I. RATIONALE

This Anti-Drug Abuse Council (ADAC) Performance Audit is a collaborative effort

between national government agencies (NGAs), local government units (LGUs), and civil
society organizations (CSOs). It employs a multi-level and participatory audit structure to
ensure the integrity of the audit process and its results. This Performance Audit aims to
achieve the following:
(1) Assess the functionality and effectiveness of local ADACs based on existing
issuances and policies;
(2) Determine ADAC-initiated and / or endorsed innovations and best practices at
all levels;
(3) Create a platform for evaluation and assessment; and
(4) Recognize the best, effective, and performing ADACs.

II. COVERAGE

Eighty-two (82) Provincial ADACs, one hundred and forty-nine (149) City ADACs, and
one thousand four hundred eighty-five (1,485) Municipal ADACs under the jurisdiction of
seventeen (17) DILG Regional Offices.

To ensure the continuous improvement and performance of ADACs in the

implementation, monitoring and evaluation of anti-illegal drug activities, refer on the
indicators and MOVs stated on Annex B, the PADS-PMO, under the supervision of the
BLGS, will conduct a Performance Audit for Audit Year 2023 in the Provincial, City and
Municipal ADACs to ascertain their functionality (i.e. high, moderate, and low).

III. DEFINITION OF TERMS

1. Local Chief Executive – refers to Municipal Mayors, City Mayors, and Provincial
Governors as Chairman of their respective Anti-Drug Abuse Councils (ADAC).
2. LGU ADAC Focal Person – refers to persons appointed by Mayors based on an
Executive Order. The LGU ADAC Focal Person shall be responsible for the data
gathering and uploading.
3. Best, performing, effective ADAC – refers to ADACs with high functionality scores,
passed the eligibility requirements, and passed the awarding assessment.
4. DILG ADAC Focal – refers to DILG Local Government Operations Officers
(LGOOs) appointed by the Regional Directors responsible for all coordination
regarding ADAC Programs at regional level. Also referred to as the Regional
Managers.
 5. ADAC PAC (ADAC Provincial Audit Committee) – refers to the team convened at
Provincial level responsible for auditing C/MADACs.
6. ADAC RAC (ADAC Regional Audit Committee) – refers to the team convened at
Regional level responsible for auditing the PADACs.
7. ADAC NAC (ADAC National Audit Committee) – refers to the team convened at
the National level responsible for auditing the P/C/MADACs.
8. RTA (Regional Technical Assistants) - refers to the personnel responsible for the
creation of accounts for the Regional Managers, ADAC Regional Audit Committee,
ADAC Provincial Audit Committee, and LGU ADAC focal persons.
9. Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) – accredited organizations actively involved in
the implementation of anti-illegal drug programs or similar activities.
10. Philippine Anti-Illegal Drugs Strategy-Project Management Office (PADS-PMO) -
is an office within the Department which acts as Secretariat during the conduct of
the audit.
11. National Report Form (NRF) - refers to the form submitted to SILG and to be used
in SGLG
12. Drug Affectation - refers to level of drug affectation of a barangay such as Slightly
Affected, Moderately Affected and Seriously Affected, based on the presence of
PWUDs, Pushers, Drug Den Maintainers, Coddlers, Protectors, Financiers,
Cultivators, Manufacturers and others, existence of illegal drug facilities, and
prevalence of illegal drug activities.
13. Drug-Cleared Barangay – refers to a barangay that is previously classified as a
drug affected and underwent BDCP and declared as drug-cleared by the Regional
Oversight Committee on Barangay Drug Clearing (ROCBDC).
14. Drug-Free Barangay – refers to an unaffected Barangay that has been vetted and
confirmed by ROCBDC

IV. PERFORMANCE AUDIT MECHANISM

1. PERFORMANCE AUDIT TOOLS

Only the prescribed system and tools shall be used in the submission of Means of
Verification (MOVs) and documentation of results and observations during the audit
process.

1.1 Functionality Assessment Tools

a. Anti-Drug Abuse Council–Functionality Monitoring System
(ADAC-FMS) – an information system used by encoders, auditors,
and regional managers for the submission and verification of Means
of Verification (MOVs) for ADAC audit.
 b. Anti-Drug Abuse System (ADAS) – a monitoring and reporting
system used for the collection and submission of the CBDRP report.
c. Local Anti-Drug Plan of Action (LADPA) System – a monitoring
system used to generate the plans and programs under anti-illegal
drugs as incorporated in their POPS Plan.
d. ADAC Performance Audit Protocol – a reference document that
details the phases, processes, and timeline of the conduct of the
performance audit.
e. ADAC Performance Audit Indicator Reference – a document that
provides the indicators, Means of Verification, point allocation, and
considerations that will be used during the audit in order to measure
the functionality and effectiveness of local ADACs.
f. PDEA Certification – required template to be used for the
requested data on Barangay Drug Clearing, this certification is to be
provided and issued by the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency
(PDEA)
g. CBDRP Certification – required template to be used for the
certification of the submitted CBDRP quarterly reports of the cities
and municipalities. The certification shall be signed by the LCE and
the LGU’s CBDRP Focal Person.
h. Attestation – required document to be signed by the LCE and
uploaded to the ADAC-FMS to attest that all uploaded MOVs are
true, correct and complete.
i. Functionality Rating – a document that can be downloaded
through the Communicating Results function of the ADAC-FMS. It
contains the score per indicator and sub-indicator, functionality audit
score, and the remarks, if applicable, from their respective audit
teams.

1.2 Awarding Assessment Tools

a. ADAC Awarding Protocol – a reference document that details the
processes, roles and responsibilities of the conduct of the awarding
assessment.

b. ADAC Awarding Criteria – a document that provides the criteria,

Means of Verification, and point allocation, that will be used during
the awarding assessment.
2. AUDIT TEAM STRUCTURES, COMPOSITION, AND FUNCTIONS

The following teams shall be assembled and convened by the responsible DILG
offices to verify submitted document and conduct performance audit:

i. ADAC Provincial Audit Committee (ADAC PAC)

The ADAC PAC shall be chaired by the DILG Provincial Director or his
representative, and shall be composed of representatives from the
provincial Philippine National Police (PNP), Philippine Drug Enforcement
Agency (PDEA), and two (2) accredited CSOs.

The ADAC PAC shall convene to audit all Component Cities and
Municipalities within their areas of jurisdiction.

ii. ADAC Regional Audit Committee (ADAC RAC)

The ADAC RAC shall be chaired by the DILG Regional Director or his
representative and shall be composed of representatives from the regional
PNP, PDEA, and two (2) accredited CSOs.

The ADAC RAC shall convene to audit all Provinces, Highly Urbanized
Cities, and Independent Component Cities within their areas of jurisdiction.

iii. ADAC National Audit Committee (ADAC NAC)

The ADAC NAC shall be assembled and convened by the PADS-PMO. The
ANT shall be chaired by the DILG Secretary or his representative and shall
be composed of representatives from the DDB, PNP, PDEA, and one (1)
accredited CSO.

The ADAC NAC shall conduct a national calibration to review, rectify and
calibrate the results of the audit and the finalization of audit results to be
presented to the Secretary. The ADAC NAC shall also lead the conduct of
the awarding assessment and issue resolution/s to provide further
guidelines as agreed by the members.
3. PERFORMANCE AUDIT PROCESS

The following process and procedure shall be followed in the conduct of the
performance audit:

i. Creation of Accounts
1. PADS-PMO shall create accounts for the Regional Technical Assistants.
2. ADAC Regional Technical Assistants shall create accounts for the Regional
Managers, ADAC RAC, ADAC PAC, and LGU ADAC focal persons.

ii. Data Gathering and Uploading

1. Within the specified period as provided under Item V hereof, all LGU ADAC
focal persons shall gather all required MOVs as listed in the indicator
reference.
2. Upon gathering all of the required MOVs, the LGU ADAC focal persons shall
endorse all gathered MOVs to the Local Chief Executives (LCEs), in the
Provincial level, the Governors, and in the City and Municipality level, the
Mayors, for signature.
3. The LGU ADAC Focal shall also gather, and later upload, the required
documents needed for the awarding assessment (refer to Annex H). Non-
submission of MOVs may be grounds for garnering 0 points and not passing
the awarding assessment. Late submission of physical and/or soft copies
of MOVs shall not be accepted and considered.
4. Upon signing of all gathered MOVs and the attestation, the LCE shall
endorse the same back to the LGU ADAC focal persons for uploading and
to fill out data fields under the ADAC-Functionality Monitoring System
(ADAC-FMS).
5. To complete the data capture process, the Attestation (refer to Annex E)
executed by the LCE shall also be uploaded.
6. In the case of a wrong document submitted prior to the confirmation for
audit, the DILG ADAC Focal can use the Return Button to return the wrong
MOV/s submitted. The LGU ADAC focal person shall then reupload the
correct MOV/s, fill out data fields under the ADAC-FMS, and reupload the
Attestation executed by the LCE. The return button shall only be available
during this phase and the MOVs shall be resubmitted for audit within the
prescribed timeline.

iii. Audit Phase

1. Upon confirmation of the DILG ADAC Focal Persons of all uploaded MOVs
for audit to their respective audit teams, the concerned DILG Office shall
convene the ADAC PAC, to audit the component cities and municipalities,
 and ADAC RAC, to audit the provinces, highly urbanized cities, and
independent component cities, using only the MOVs uploaded through the
ADAC-FMS.
2. There shall be no rounding off of scores and percentage computed, per
indicator, sub-indicator or total score, as generated in the system.
3. During the audit, through the ADAC-FMS, the auditors shall provide their
recommendations that they may deem applicable to the improvement
and/or sustainability on the specific indicators of the LGUs. The LGUs may
consider these recommendations for adoption into their anti-illegal drugs
programs.
4. After the conduct of the audit, the ADAC PAC and ADAC RAC shall
generate the provincial and regional audit report, respectively, through the
ADAC-FMS, and have it signed by the members of the audit team prior to
re-uploading the same.

iv. Submission of Audit Result

1. All Provincial and Regional reports submitted to the ADAC NAC, through
the ADAC-FMS, shall be treated as official.
2. The PADS-PMO shall consolidate the submitted reports and endorse to
ADAC NAC in preparation for the calibration, and finalization of audit
results.

v. Audit Results Calibration and Finalization

1. The PADS-PMO, under the supervision of BLGS, shall convene the ADAC
NAC to conduct the calibration and finalization of the audit results.
2. Once the results are finalized, the PADS-PMO shall generate the National
Reporting Form (NRF) using the ADAC-FMS.

vi. Presentation of Functional and Non-Functional ADACs

1. The NRF shall be presented to the SILG, and once approved, shall be
declared as valid and final.
2. The performance audit rating shall be made available and accessible to the
Local Chief Executives or their authorized representatives thru the ADAC-
FMS Communicating Results tab. All LGUs shall view and generate their
respective functionality rating.
3. Subsequently, the ADAC RAC, and the ADAC PAC shall conduct exit
conferences or similar activities with their respective Local Government
Units to discuss performance audit results. A utilization report shall then be
submitted to the ADAC NAC through the ADAC-FMS.
4. PERFORMANCE AUDIT CRITERIA

4.1 The following main and sub performance indicators for the PADAC will be
measured based on the provisions set forth in DILG-DDB JMC No. 2018-
01:

1. Creation / Reorganization of ADAC (10 points)

i. Creation / Reorganization of PADAC (5 points)
ii. Composition of members compliant to DILG-DDB JMC No. 2018-01 (5
points)

2. Allocation of substantial amount as indicated in the ADAC Plan (15 points)

i. Allocation of substantial amounts for the implementation of anti-illegal
drug activities as indicated in their respective LADPA, Approved POPS
Plan, and certification from the Budget Officer stating the actual allocation
and utilization during the audit year.

3. Formulation and Implementation of Plans and Programs (50 points)

i. Financial Accomplishment (15 points)
ii. Physical Accomplishment (15 points)
iii. Percentage of Drug-Cleared Barangays of Component LGUs (15 points)
iv. Establishment and Operationalization of Special Drug Education Centers
(5 points)

4. Supervision and Support to Component ADACs (10 points)

i. Functionality and effectiveness of component ADACs (5 points)
ii. Financial and/or technical support to component ADACs (5 points)

5. Conduct of Quarterly Meetings (10 points)

i. PADAC conducted quarterly meetings, or as often as needed

6. Innovation/s (5 points)
An example of an LGU’s initiative for innovation are the following:
● Providing support to the community-based rehabilitation programs
tailored to the needs of their component LGUs.
● Utilizing the data available to identify high-risk areas and allocate
resources effectively.
● Implementing technology-based solutions for reporting and
accessing support services.
● Innovative advocacy campaigns and/or activities that will ensure the
active participation of the community.
 ● Building collaborations and partnerships with various stakeholders
such as the private sector, CSOs, Faith-Based Organizations, and
schools.
● Issuing innovative policies on drug abuse prevention and support for
rehabilitation.
● Establishing mechanisms for monitoring, evaluation, to ensure
continuous improvement.

Any of the following can be the MOV:

i. National Government Member Agency-initiated activity, facility, or
program in partnership with the LGU through a MOA/U, resolution, and
any other equivalent issuances endorsing such initiative and is recognized
through any reputable organization; or,
ii. Civil society organization (CSO)-initiated activity, facility, or program
conducted in cooperation with the LGU through a MOA/U, resolution,
and/or any other equivalent binding agreement, and implementing such
initiative.
iii. LGU-initiated activity, facility, or program implemented by the LGU which
can be considered as an innovation. Activity or program can be a mandate
of the LGU but should have been implemented innovatively and
recognized by any award-giving body.

4.2 The following main and sub performance indicators for the CADAC/MADAC
will be measured based on the provisions set forth in DILG-DDB JMC No.
2018-01:

1. Creation / Reorganization of ADAC (10 points)

i. Creation / Reorganization of CADAC / MADAC (5 points)
ii. Composition of members compliant to DILG-DDB JMC No. 2018-01
(5 points)

2. Allocation of substantial amount as indicated in the ADAC Plan of Action

(15 points)
i. Allocation of substantial amounts for the implementation of anti-
illegal drug activities as indicated in their LADPA, Approved POPS
Plan, and certification from the Budget Officer stating the actual
allocation and utilization during the audit year.

3. Implementation of ADAC Plans and Programs (40 points)

i. Financial Accomplishment (10 points)
 ii. Physical Accomplishment (10 points)
iii. Percentage of Drug-Cleared Barangays of Component LGUs (20
points)

4. Supervision and Support to Component ADACs (20 points)

i. Community-Based Drug Rehabilitation Program Reporting (10
points)
ii. Financial Support to component ADACs (5 points)
iii. Technical support to component ADACs (5 points)

5. Conduct of Quarterly Meetings (10 points)

i. Local ADAC meetings conducted quarterly, or as often as needed

6. Innovation/s (5 points)
An example of an LGU’s initiative for innovation are the following:
● Developing community-based rehabilitation programs tailored to
their respective needs.
● Utilizing the data available to identify high-risk areas and allocate
resources effectively.
● Implementing technology-based solutions for reporting and
accessing support services.
● Innovative advocacy campaigns and/or activities that will ensure the
active participation of the community.
● Building collaborations and partnerships with various stakeholders
such as the private sector, CSOs, Faith-Based Organizations, and
schools.
● Issuing innovative policies on drug abuse prevention and support for
rehabilitation.
● Establishing mechanisms for monitoring, evaluation, to ensure
continuous improvement.

Any of the following:

i. National Government Member Agency-initiated activity, facility, or
program in partnership with the LGU through a MOA/U, resolution,
and any other equivalent issuances endorsing such initiative and is
recognized through any reputable organization; or,
ii. Civil society organization (CSO)-initiated activity, facility, or program
conducted in cooperation with the LGU through a MOA/U, resolution,
and/or any other equivalent binding agreement, and implementing
such initiative.
 iii. LGU-initiated activity, facility, or program implemented by the LGU
which can be considered as an innovation. Activity or program can
be a mandate of the LGU but should have been implemented
innovatively and recognized by any award-giving body.

5. ADJECTIVAL RATING OF FUNCTIONALITY

The adjectival rating of ADAC performance and functionality are as follows:

Audit Score Adjectival Rating

85 – 100 High Functional

51 – 84 Moderate Functional

50 below Low Functional

V. INDICATIVE TIMELINE

Audit Phase Schedule

Component Cities/Municipalities
March 5 - 18
Phase 1: Data Gathering and
Uploading Phase Provinces/HUCs/ICCs
April 2 - 15

Component Cities/Municipalities
March 19 - April 1

Phase 2: ADAC Audit Phase Provinces/HUCs/ICCs

April 16 - 30

Phase 3: Submission of Audit Results May 2 - 10

Phase 4: Audit Results Calibration

and Finalization May
Phase 5: Presentation of ADAC
Functionality Result
 Annex B

Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
DILG-NAPOLCOM Center, EDSA corner Quezon Avenue, Quezon City
www.dilg.gov.ph

DILG PHILIPPINE ANTI-ILLEGAL DRUGS STRATEGY -

PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICE

ANTI-DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL

PERFORMANCE AUDIT
INDICATOR REFERENCE
 AY 2023 ADAC PERFORMANCE AUDIT INDICATOR REFERENCE FOR PADAC

INDICATOR MEANS OF VERIFICATION POINT CONDITION/S REMARKS

ALLOCATION
Indicator 1 – Creation / Reorganization of ADAC (10 points)

a. Has the PADAC been Yes – 5 The MOV submitted shall

organized/reorganized? No – 0 specifically state the name
and the membership of the
ADAC Member. The EO shall
1. Executive Order be the latest, if there is a
reorganization in the
Conditional: structure.
1. Certification from
b. Is the composition of the
concerned NGA stating that If any of the NGA members
PADAC compliant to DILG-
mandatory ADAC Member is prescribed in the JMC is not
DDB JMC No. 2018-01?
Vacant/Not Applicable in present in the province, a
Chairman: Governor City/Municipality; or certification stating such
Vice Chairman: PNP PD absence/vacancy from the
Members: DILG PD, DEPED 2. Certification from the Yes – 5 concerned NGA/ADAC Chair
Prov Official, DOJ Prov ADAC Chair stating that No – 0 must be secured before the
Prosecutor, RTC Exec Judge, mandatory ADAC Member is PADAC can get point
PHO, PSWDO, PPIO, PPPO, Vacant/Not Applicable in allocation.
all C/MADAC Chairpersons, 1 City/Municipality
inter-faith group The PADAC may appoint
representative, 2 civil society additional members,
organizations representative however, prescribed
members may not be
removed or substituted.
Indicator 2 – Allocation of Substantial amount as indicated in the ADAC Plan (15 points)

Download and
1. LADPA System Form
upload the
3a-Consolidated
If the three (3) MOVs are POPS Plan
submitted and necessary RF1, generated
2.POPS Plan RF 1 (1st and from the POPS-
a. Is there an amount information is contained
2nd Semester), and 15 – 3 MOVs PCMS
allocated for the therein (actual amount
implementation of anti-drug 0 – 1-2 or no allocated and utilization), the
activities, as indicated in the 3. Certification from the MOVs indicator is considered Download and
POPS Plan and/or LADPA? Budget Officer re: compiled and will get full upload the form
Allocation of funds for the points. Otherwise, no points from the LADPA
implementation of Anti- will be given System (w/ QR
Drug Activities stating the code and
actual fund allocation and timestamp)
utilization for the audit year

Indicator 3 – Formulation and Implementation of Plans and Programs (50 points)

1.LADPA System Form 3a- Download and
Full utilization of fund will be
Consolidated upload the form
counted
2. POPS Plan RF 1 (1st and from the LADPA
2nd Semester) System (w/ QR
15 - 85% - 100% Reallocated funds shall be
3. Certification from the 12 - 61% - 84% code and
considered given that the timestamp)
Budget Officer re: Allocation
a. Financial Accomplishment 10 - 41% - 60% funds are realigned for similar
of funds for the
7 - 21% - 40% projects for anti-illegal drugs.
implementation of Anti-Drug 3 MOVs shall be
Activities stating the actual 0 - 20% below uploaded
fund allocation and utilization Cancellation of activities with
for the audit year funding may be allowed given
that the diminution is pro rata.
 The LGU shall also upload
their POPS Plan RF 1 given
that the main basis shall still
be the LADPA RF 3a. POPS
Plan RF 1 can only be
considered if there is no data
in the generated LADPA RF
3a.

LADPA RF 3a is required to
be uploaded even if there are
no data reflected.
Fully implemented activity will
be counted. Download and
upload the form
Partially accomplished from the LADPA
activity shall only be counted System (w/ QR
if it is an activity that will be code and
conducted until the timestamp)
15 - 85% - 100%
1.LADPA System Form 3a- succeeding year.
12 - 61% - 84%
Consolidated Annual plan shall
10 - 41% - 60%
b. Physical Accomplishment 2. POPS Plan RF 1 (1st and Not implemented will still be be the basis of
7 - 21% - 40% physical targets
2nd Semester) counted in the total number of
0 - 20% below activities committed for the for the year.
year.
2 MOVs shall be
Cancelled will not be counted upload
in the total number of activities
committed provided with
remarks.
 The LGU shall also upload
their POPS Plan RF 1 given
that the main basis shall still
be the LADPA RF 3a. POPS
Plan RF 1 can only be
considered if there is no data
in the generated LADPA RF
3a.

LADPA RF 3a is required to
be uploaded even if there are
no data reflected.
The Certification
15 – 80% - 100% shall follow the
of affected prescribed
1.1 If the province has been
barangays are certification
declared as drug-
drug cleared cleared province, template (refer to
Certification from RD Annex C).
1. Certification from RD 10 – 50% - 79% PDEA must state the
PDEA stating the number of: of drug affected province declared as
c. Percentage of drug drug-cleared status.
barangays are To compute for the
affected barangays declared
drug cleared % of Drug Cleared
drug-cleared within the 1.2 If the province has been
1.1 Drug-cleared Barangays:
province declared as drug-free
barangays for audit 5 – 10% - 49% of province, Certification
year 2023 and; [NO. OF DRUG-
drug affected from RD PDEA must CLEARED BRGYs
barangays are state the province (as of December
1.2 Drug-free declared as drug-free
drug cleared 2023) / NO. OF
barangays for audit year status. AFFECTED BRGYs
2023 (as of December
0 – Below 10% of 2022) + NO. OF
drug affected DRUG-CLEARED
BRGYs (as of
 barangays are December 2022) ] X
100%
drug cleared

If Province Owned: Can be an

1. Executive Order, equivalent facility
Resolution, or any other or a designated
equivalent issuance area
designating the SDEC; If Province
and Owned:
5 – with 2 MOVs
2. Approved SDEC Work 0 – with 1-0
d. Establishment and
and Financial Plan MOVs SDEC must be LGU-
Operationalization of Special
(Annex 1 of DILG MC maintained, either solely or
Drug Education Center
2021-001); or Approved shared with another LGU.
(SDEC)
PPAs and funding
(Certificate from the If shared:
Budget 5 - with MOA
Officer/Accountant) 0 - without MOA

If shared:
1. MOA with the LGU
sharing the facility.

Indicator 4 – Support to Component ADACs (10 points)

1. Summary of Only Component

a. Functionality and 5 - 85% - 100%
Performance Audit Results C/MADACs who are high
Effectiveness of Component ADACs high
as generated in the ADAC- functional shall be
C/MADACs functional
FMS, signed and endorsed considered.
by the ADAC PAC
 3 - 50% - 84%
ADACs are high
functional

0 – Less than
50% ADACs are
high functional
1. Executive Order
Containing Financial
Support for Component
C/MADACs or Certification
from the Accountant re:
funds for component
C/MADACs’ activities,
specifically stating the
amount provided, and
Terminal Report or;

5 – with No quota on the amount of

b. Financial or Technical 2. Executive Order
submission financial support or degree
Support to Component Containing Technical
0 – without of technical support
C/MADACs Support for Component
submission provided.
C/MADACs and Terminal
Report or;

3. LADPA Form 3a-

Consolidated or POPS Plan
RF 1 (1st and 2nd semester),
highlight the activity funded
or technical support
provided, and Terminal
Report
Indicator 5 – Conduct of Meetings (10 points)
1. Notice of Meetings that is
duly acknowledged/received
by members, and
2. Minutes of the Meetings
a. Has the PADAC conducted
four (4) quarterly meetings?
Conditional:
a. ADAC agenda if meeting is
joint with POC or with other
Local Special Bodies
If the number of meetings is
equal to the sets of MOVs
submitted, the indicator is
considered complied.
Minutes of the meeting must
contain all members present
during the meeting. Quorum
(50% of member agencies
present +1) must be proven
before the meeting can be
10 – 4 meetings counted.
conducted
One or more meetings
5 – 1-3 meetings conducted in the same
conducted quarter shall be counted as
only one (1) meeting.
0 – no meetings
conducted
Virtual meetings are counted
provided with the screenshot
of the conduct of the meeting
and the attendees.
Indicator 6 – Innovation/s (5 points)
a. National Government For LGU
Member Agency-initiated initiated, 1 and 2
activity, facility, or program 1. MOA/U, Resolution, and MOVs shall be
initiated in partnership with any other equivalent provided, if one
the LGU; or issuances endorsing such of the two is
b. Accredited CSO-initiated initiative, and/or missing, this
activity, facility or program shall be
activity in partnership with considered as
2. Any other equivalent
the LGU; or without
binding agreement
submission
endorsing, and
implementing such initiative
5 – with
Any of the three conditions
For LGU initiated: submission
will suffice with their
1. Post-Activity Report of the 0 – without
corresponding MOV/s
conducted activity, facility, or submission
c. LGU- initiated activity, program stating the
facility or program that is innovation conducted and
duly recognized, how the activity, facility, or
acknowledged, or awarded program is an innovation,
by any award giving body and
2. Award, certificate or any
form of proof of recognition
from any award-giving body
stating that the activity,
facility, or program is an
innovation.
 AY 2023 ADAC PERFORMANCE AUDIT INDICATOR REFERENCE FOR C/MADAC
INDICATOR
Indicator 1 – Creation / Reorganization of ADAC (10 points)
a. Has the C/MADAC been
organized/reorganized?
b. Is the composition of the
C/MADAC compliant to
DILG-DDB JMC No. 2018-
01?
Chairman: Mayor
Vice Chairman: PNP CD or
CoP
Members: DILG CD or
C/MLGOO, DEPED C/M
Official, DOJ City Prosecutor
(for CADAC only), R/MTC
Judge, C/MHO, C/MSWDO,
C/MPIO, C/MPPO, 1 inter-
faith group rep, 2 civil society
orgs rep
POINT
MEANS OF VERIFICATION CONDITION/S REMARKS
ALLOCATION
If the MOV submitted shall
Yes – 5
specifically state the name
No – 0
and the membership of the
ADAC Member. The EO
shall be the latest, if there
1. Executive Order is a reorganization in the
structure.
Conditional:
1. Certification from If any of the NGA
concerned NGA stating that members prescribed in
mandatory ADAC Member the JMC is not present in
is Vacant/Not Applicable in the city/municipality, a
City/Municipality; or certification stating such
absence/vacancy from
Yes – 5
2. Certification from the the concerned
No – 0 NGA/ADAC Chair must
ADAC Chair stating that
mandatory ADAC Member be secured before the
is Vacant/Not Applicable in C/MADAC can get point
City/Municipality allocation.
The C/MADAC may
appoint additional
members, however,
prescribed members may
not be removed or
substituted.
Indicator 2 – Allocation of substantial amount as indicated in the ADAC Plan (15 points)

1. LADPA System Form 3a-

Consolidated; If the three (3) MOVs are
submitted and necessary
2. POPS Plan RF 1 (1st and
information is contained
a. Is there an amount 2nd Semester)
therein (actual amount
allocated for the 3. Certification from the 15 – 3 MOVs
allocated and utilization),
implementation of anti-drug Budget Officer re: Allocation 0 – 1-2 or no
the indicator is
activities, as indicated in the of funds for the MOVs
considered compiled and
POPS Plan? implementation of Anti-Drug will get full points.
Activities stating the actual Otherwise, no points will
fund allocation and be given
utilization for the audit year

Indicator 3 – Formulation and Implementation of Plans and Programs (40 points)

1.LADPA System Form 3a- Full utilization of fund will Download and
Consolidated be counted upload the
2. POPS Plan RF 1 (1st and POPS Plan RF1,
2nd Semester) Reallocated funds shall be generated from
3.Certification from the considered given that the the POPS-
Budget Officer re: Allocation 10 - 75% - 100% funds are realigned for PCMS
of funds for the 7 - 50% - 74% similar projects for anti-
a. Financial Accomplishment
implementation of Anti-Drug 5 - 25% - 49% illegal drugs. Download and
Activities stating the actual 0 - Below 25% upload the form
fund allocation and utilization Cancellation of activities from the LADPA
for the audit year with funding may be System (w/ QR
allowed given that the code and
diminution is pro rata. timestamp)
 The LGU shall upload their
POPS Plan RF 1 given that 3 MOVs shall
the main basis shall still be be uploaded
the LADPA RF 3a. POPS
Plan RF 1 can only be
considered if there is no
data in the generated
LADPA RF 3a.

LADPA RF 3a is required
to be uploaded even if
there are no data reflected.
Fully implemented activity
will be counted. Download and
upload the
Partially accomplished POPS Plan RF1,
activity shall only be generated from
counted if it is an activity the POPS-
that will be conducted until PCMS
1.LADPA System Form 3a- the succeeding year.
10 - 75% - 100%
Consolidated Download and
7 - 50% - 74%
b. Physical Accomplishment 2. POPS Plan RF 1 (1st and Not implemented will still upload the form
5 - 25% - 49%
2nd Semester) be counted in the total from the LADPA
0 - Below 25% System (w/ QR
number of activities
committed for the year. code and
timestamp)
Cancelled will not be
counted in the total Annual plan shall
number of activities be the basis of
committed provided with physical targets
remarks. for the year.
 The LGU shall upload their 2 MOVs shall be
POPS Plan RF 1 given that upload
the main basis shall still be
the LADPA RF 3a. POPS
Plan RF 1 can only be
considered if there is no
data in the generated
LADPA RF 3a.

LADPA RF 3a is required
to be uploaded even if
there are no data reflected.

For
HUC/ICCs/Cs/Ms The Certification
with only 1.1 If the city/municipality
shall follow the
unaffected has been declared as
prescribed
barangays: drug-cleared,
certification
Certification from RD
template (refer to
1. Certification from RD PDEA must state the
20 - 100% of Annex C).
c. Percentage of drug PDEA stating the number of: city/municipality declared
unaffected
affected barangays declared as drug-cleared status.
barangays are To compute for the
drug-cleared within the city /
drug free % of Drug Cleared
municipality 1.1 Drug-cleared 1.2 If the city/municipality Barangays:
barangays for audit has been declared as
For
year 2023 and; drug-free, Certification [NO. OF DRUG-
HUC/ICCs/Cs/M CLEARED BRGYs
from RD PDEA must
s with (a) (as of December
state the city/municipality
1.2 Drug-free affected and 2023) / NO. OF
declared as drug-free AFFECTED BRGYs
barangays for audit unaffected
status. (as of December
year 2023 barangays or 2022) + NO. OF
DRUG-CLEARED
(b) with only BRGYs (as of
December 2022) ] X
affected
100%
barangays:

20 points
– 80% - 100% of
drug affected
barangays are
drug cleared

15 points
– 60% - 79% of
drug-affected
barangays are
drug cleared

10 points
– 40% - 59% of
drug affected
barangays are
drug cleared

5 points
– 10% - 39% of
drug affected
barangays are
drug cleared
 0 – Below 10% of
drug affected
barangays are
drug cleared

Indicator 4 – Supervision and Support to Component ADACs (20 points)

For BDRP
CBDRP quarterly report Certification
generated from ADAS and 10 – 4 template refer to
Certification signed by LCE submitted Annex D
CBDRP RF 1 will only be
and LGU CBDRP Focal reports
considered for 1st and 2nd
a. Community Based Drug Person containing the dates Quarter reports, given that
Rehabilitation Program 5 – 1-3
the reports were submitted the reports generated for
(CBDRP) Reporting submitted
the 2 quarters using the
report/s
Conditional: ADAS are null.
1. CBDRP RF1 (1st and 0 – no
2nd Quarter) submitted report

1.Executive Order Containing Terminal report

Financial Support, with the not prepared by
amount, for Component the LGU shall be
BADACs and Terminal Report treated as non-
(prepared and submitted by 5 – with compliance
No quota on the amount
b. Financial Support to the LGU) or; submission
of financial support
Component BADACs 2. Certification from the 0 – without
provided.
Accountant re: funds for submission
component BADACs’
activities, with specific amount,
and Terminal Report
(prepared by the LGU) or;
 3. LADPA Form 3a-
Consolidated or POPS Plan
RF 1 (1st and 2nd Sem),
highlight the activity funded,
and Terminal Report (prepared
by the LGU).

1. Executive Order Containing Terminal report

Technical Support for not prepared by
Component BADACs and the LGU shall be
Terminal Report (prepared by treated as non-
any member of C/MADAC) or; compliance.
5 – with
2. LADPA Form 3a- No quota on the degree of
c. Technical Support to submission
Consolidated or POPS Plan technical support
Component BADACs 0 – without
RF 1 (1st and 2nd Sem), provided.
submission
highlight the technical support
provided, and Terminal
Report (prepared by any
member of C/MADAC)

Indicator 5 – Conduct of Meetings (10 points)

1. Notice of Meetings that is
duly acknowledged/received 10 – 4 meetings If the number of meetings
by members, and conducted is equal to the sets of
MOVs submitted, the
a. Has the C/MADAC
2. Minutes of the Meetings 5 – 1 - 3 indicator is considered
conducted four (4) quarterly
meetings complied.
meetings?
Conditional: conducted
a. ADAC agenda if meeting is Minutes of the meeting
0 – no meetings
joint with POC or with other must contain all
conducted
Local Special Bodies members present during
 the meeting. Quorum
(50% of member
agencies present +1)
must be proven before
the meeting can be
counted.

One or more meetings

conducted in the same
quarter shall be counted
as only one (1) meeting.

Virtual meetings are

counted provided with the
screenshot of the meeting
and the attendees.

Indicator 6 – Innovation/s (5 points)

a. National Government 1. MOA/U, Resolution, and For LGU
Member Agency-initiated any other equivalent initiated, nos. 1
activity, facility, or program issuances endorsing such and 2 MOVs
initiated in partnership with initiative, and/or shall be
the LGU; or provided, if one
Any of the three of the two is
b. Accredited CSO- 2. Any other equivalent 5 – with
conditions will suffice missing, this
initiated activity, facility or binding agreement submission
with their corresponding shall be
program activity in endorsing, and implementing 0 – without MOV/s considered as
partnership with the LGU; such initiative submission
or without
submission
c. LGU- initiated activity, For LGU initiated:
facility or program that is 1. Post-Activity Report of the
duly recognized, conducted activity, facility, or
acknowledged, or awarded program stating the innovation
by any award giving body conducted and how the activity,
facility, or program is an
innovation, and
2. Award, certificate or any
form of proof of recognition
from any award-giving body
stating that the activity, facility,
or program is an innovation.
 Annex C

Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
DILG-NAPOLCOM Center, EDSA corner Quezon Avenue, Quezon City
www.dilg.gov.ph

DILG PHILIPPINE ANTI-ILLEGAL DRUGS STRATEGY -

PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICE

ANTI-DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL

PDEA DRUG CLEARING CERTIFICATION
 PHILIPPINE DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
REGIONAL OFFICE
PDEA LOGO ADDRESS
CONTACT DETAILS

CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that, based on PDEA Regional Office __ official records and approved by the Regional Oversight Committee
on Barangay Drug Clearing, below are the total number of Drug-Cleared, Drug Affected, Drug-Free, and Drug Unaffected
barangays in the PROVINCE/CITY/MUNICIPALITY of __________, Province of ______ for CY 2022 and 2023, pursuant
to the Dangerous Drugs Board (DDB) Regulation No. 4 series of 2021. Breakdown as follows:
TOTAL Province/City/M NO. OF DRUG NO. OF DRUG-FREE NO. OF AFFECTED NO. OF CLEARED NO. OF AFFECTED REMARKS
NUMBER unicipality Name UNAFFECTED BRGYs BRGYs BRGYs BRGYs
OF BRGYs BRGYs (as of December (as of December (as of December (as of December
(as of December 2022) 2022) 2022) 2022) +
2022) NO. OF CLEARED
BRGYs
(as of December
2022)

*For provinces, breakdown the total number of barangays per cities and municipalities within their jurisdiction.

This Certification is issued upon request of the Department of the Interior and Local Government Regional Office __ and
_____ Anti-Drug Abuse Council to support the conduct of the 2023 ADAC Performance Audit.

Issued this ___ day of MONTH 2024 at ___________________________.

TOTAL NO. OF DRUG NO. OF DRUG- NO. OF NO. OF DRUG- % OF DRUG NO. OF REVOKED
NUMBER Province/City/ UNAFFECTED FREE BRGYs AFFECTED CLEARED BRGYs CLEARED BRGYs BRGYs
OF BRGYs Municipality BRGYs (as of December BRGYs (as of December as of 2023* (CY 2023)
Name (as of December 2023) (as of December 2023)
2023) 2023)

NAME
*NOTE: PDEA REGIONAL DIRECTOR
To compute for the % of Drug Cleared Barangays: Chairperson, ROCBDC
NO. OF DRUG-CLEARED BRGYs (as of December 2023)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X 100%
NO. OF AFFECTED BRGYs (as of December 2022) +
NO. OF CLEARED BRGYs (as of December 2022)
 Annex D

Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
DILG-NAPOLCOM Center, EDSA corner Quezon Avenue, Quezon City
www.dilg.gov.ph

DILG PHILIPPINE ANTI-ILLEGAL DRUGS STRATEGY -

PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICE

ANTI-DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL

PERFORMANCE AUDIT
CBDRP CERTIFICATION
 Insert
Logo
Here

NAME OF THE LGU

ADDRESS OF THE LGU

CERTIFICATION

This is to certify that the (LGU Name) has submitted (No.) Community-Based Drug Rehabilitation
Program (CBDRP) Quarterly Reports for CY 2023, pursuant to DILG Advisory dated March 22,
2021 “Submission of Community-Based Drug Rehabilitation Program (CBDRP) Quarterly Reports
for 2021”. Stated below are the dates of submission per quarter:

QUARTER - DATE

All information stated herein and the attachments are accurate, correct, and complete in
accordance with the Republic of the Philippines' relevant laws, rules, and regulations.

Any misrepresentation made in this document or any of its attachments shall be subjected to
proper administrative action.

Issued this ___ day of ____, ____ at ___________________________________________

Prepared by:

SIGNATURE OVER PRINTED NAME

City/Municipality CBDRP Focal Person

Approved by:

SIGNATURE OVER PRINTED NAME

Local Chief Executive (LCE)
 Annex E

Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
DILG-NAPOLCOM Center, EDSA corner Quezon Avenue, Quezon City
www.dilg.gov.ph

DILG PHILIPPINE ANTI-ILLEGAL DRUGS STRATEGY -

PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICE

ANTI-DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL

PERFORMANCE AUDIT
ATTESTATION OF THE LOCAL CHIEF EXECUTIVE
 Insert
Logo
Here

NAME OF THE LGU

ADDRESS OF THE LGU

ATTESTATION

I declare under oath that all the information contained herein are true, correct and complete
pursuant to the provisions of pertinent laws, rules, and regulations of the Republic of the
Philippines.

I authorize the Secretary of the Department of the Interior and Local Government or his duly
authorized representative to verify and validate the contents stated herein.

I agree that any misrepresentation made in this document and all its attachments shall be grounds
for the filing of appropriate administrative and/or criminal case/s against me.

Accomplished and signed this _____ day of _______________, 2024.

Signed by:

________________________
Local Chief Executive
 Annex F

Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
DILG-NAPOLCOM Center, EDSA corner Quezon Avenue, Quezon City
www.dilg.gov.ph

DILG PHILIPPINE ANTI-ILLEGAL DRUGS STRATEGY -

PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICE

ANTI-DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL

PERFORMANCE AUDIT
FUNCTIONALITY RATING
 NAME OF PROVINCE
2023 ANTI-DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL (ADAC) PERFORMANCE AUDIT
FUNCTIONALITY RATING

FUNCTIONALITY INDICATOR POINTS REMARKS RECOMMENDATION

Creation / Reorganization of ADAC ( 10.00 )

Creation/Reorganization of PADAC

Composition of members compliant to DILG- DDB JMC No. 2018-01

Allocation of Funds ( 15.00 )

Allocation of Funds

Formulation and Implementation of Plans and Programs ( 50.00 )

Financial Accomplishment

Physical Accomplishment

Percentage of drug affected barangays declared drug-cleared within

the City/Municipality

Establishment of Special Drug Education Center (SDEC) or

equivalent facility/program

Supervision and Support to Component ADACs ( 10.00 )

Functionality and Effectiveness of Component C/MADACs

Financial or Technical Support to Component C/MADACs

Conduct of Meetings ( 10.00 )

Conduct of Meetings

Innovation/s ( 5.00 )

Innovations

SCORE AND ADJECTIVAL RATING

 TOTAL SCORE

ADJECTIVAL FUNCTIONALITY RATING

We declare under oath that everything indicated in this form is true, correct and complete statement pursuant to the
provisions of pertinent laws, rules and regulations of the Republic of the Philippines. We authorized the agency
head/authorized representative to verify/validate the contents stated herein. We agree that any misrepresentation made
in this document and its attachments shall cause the filing of administrative/criminal case/s

Philippine National Police Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency Department of the Interior
Representative Representative and Local Government
Representative

Civil Society Organization Civil Society Organization

Representative(1st) Representative(2nd)

Document Number:
Date Audited:
Date Generated:
 NAME OF MUNICIPALITY
Name of Province
2023 ANTI-DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL (ADAC) PERFORMANCE AUDIT
FUNCTIONALITY RATING

FUNCTIONALITY INDICATOR POINTS REMARKS RECOMMENDATION

Creation / Reorganization of ADAC ( 10.00 )

Creation/Reorganization of Local C/MADAC

Composition of members compliant to DILG- DDB JMC No. 2018-01

Allocation of Funds ( 15.00 )

Allocation of Funds

Formulation and Implementation of Plans and Programs ( 40.00 )

Financial Accomplishment

Physical Accomplishment

Percentage of drug affected barangays declared drug-cleared within

the City/Municipality

Supervision and Support to Component ADACs ( 20.00 )

Community Based Drug Rehabilitation Program (CBDRP) Reporting

Financial Support to Component BADACs

Technical Support to Component BADACs

Conduct of Meetings ( 10.00 )

Conduct of Meetings

Innovation/s ( 5.00 )

Innovations

SCORE AND ADJECTIVAL RATING

 TOTAL SCORE

ADJECTIVAL FUNCTIONALITY RATING

We declare under oath that everything indicated in this form is true, correct and complete statement pursuant to the
provisions of pertinent laws, rules and regulations of the Republic of the Philippines. We authorized the agency
head/authorized representative to verify/validate the contents stated herein. We agree that any misrepresentation made
in this document and its attachments shall cause the filing of administrative/criminal case/s

Philippine National Police Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency Department of the Interior
Representative Representative and Local Government
Representative

Civil Society Organization Civil Society Organization

Representative(1st) Representative(2nd)

Document Number:
Date Audited:
Date Generated:
 Annex G

Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
DILG-NAPOLCOM Center, EDSA corner Quezon Avenue, Quezon City
www.dilg.gov.ph

DILG PHILIPPINE ANTI-ILLEGAL DRUGS STRATEGY -

PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICE

ANTI-DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL

PERFORMANCE AUDIT
AWARDING PROTOCOL
This ADAC Performance Awarding Protocol provides for the definitions and procedures
in the conduct of assessment and determination of ADACs Awardees.

I. RATIONALE

This Anti-Drug Abuse Council (ADAC) awarding is a collaborative effort between

the National Government Agencies (NGAs), the Bureaus of this Department, and
DILG Regional Offices. It employs a multi-level and participatory assessment
structure to ensure the integrity of the awarding process and its results. This
awarding aims to achieve the following:

(1) Encourage local government units to strive for excellence and become
proactive members of the program;
(2) Create a platform for evaluation and assessment; and
(3) Identify and recognize the best, effective, and performing ADACs.

II. COVERAGE – The awarding assessment shall cover all LGUs who garnered an
overall performance score in the functionality audit of 100 points, shall not have
any seriously affected barangays for audit year 2023, and with institutional
integrity.

III. AWARDING MECHANISM

A. ADAC National Audit Committee (ADAC NAC) is being convened for the
purpose of this awarding assessment.

a. Membership
Chairperson: DILG Secretary or representative
Members: DDB Secretary or representative
PNP Chief or representative
PDEA Director General or representative
CSO Representative
Secretariat: DILG (BLGS, NBOO, PADS-PMO)

b. Functions of ADAC NAC

● Convene to calibrate the functionality results of the audit to determine the
eligible LGUs for awarding assessment
● Conduct the awarding assessment
● Finalize the result of the awarding assessment through issuance of a
resolution
 ● Discuss and evaluate concerns and issues relative to awarding assessment
and results
● Provide additional conditions or considerations through a Resolution

c. Functions of Secretariat
● Cause the convening of the ADAC NAC
● Prepare the necessary documents for the conduct of the awarding
assessment
● Prepare the draft resolution and final list of the awardees for presentation
to the SILG
● Lead in the preparation of the awarding ceremony
● Perform other functions as directed by the SILG

IV. ASSESSMENT TOOLS

Only the prescribed system and tools shall be used in the assessment and
documentation of results and observations during the audit process.

i. ADAC – Functionality Monitoring System

ii. Annex H – ADAC Awarding Criteria
iii. Annex I – Certification for Reintegration
iv. NRF
v. BADAC Functionality Results
vi. ADAC Functionality Results
vii. National PDEA Data
viii. Awarding Matrix

V. ASSESSMENT PROCESS

The following process and procedure shall be followed in the conduct of the
awarding assessment:

a. Data Gathering
1. The Secretariat shall identify local government units that passed the
awarding eligibility criteria in the 2024 ADAC Performance Audit.
2. Upon identifying the eligible local government units, the Secretariat shall
prepare the Awarding Matrix with the list of LGUs that are eligible for the
awards to be endorsed to the ADAC NAC.
3. ADAC NAC shall accomplish the Awarding Matrix to determine the
awardees.
 b. Assessment
1. Upon gathering all Assessment Matrices, the ADAC NAC shall conduct the
assessment and provide scores based on the criteria set for awarding.
2. Calibrate and finalize the awarding assessment results through a
Resolution.
3. The Secretariat is tasked to draft the Resolution based on the agreements
set by the Committee.

c. Presentation of Results
1. Assessment Results shall be posted through the ADAC-FMS.
2. Should there be clarifications, queries, and other concerns, ADAC shall
communicate with the Secretariat for endorsement to the ADAC NAC for
their consideration and/or appropriate action.

VI. AWARDING

An awarding ceremony shall be conducted to recognize and incentivize the best

performing effective / outstanding ADACs subject to the usual accounting and
auditing rules and regulations and availability of funds.
 Annex H

Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
DILG-NAPOLCOM Center, EDSA corner Quezon Avenue, Quezon City
www.dilg.gov.ph

DILG PHILIPPINE ANTI-ILLEGAL DRUGS STRATEGY -

PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICE

ANTI-DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL

PERFORMANCE AUDIT
AWARDING CRITERIA
CRITERIA 1 – Implementation of Anti-Illegal Drugs Program

CONDITION/S MEANS OF VERIFICATION POINT

ALLOCATION

The LGU shall submit MOVs for the following activities/programs:

Interventions (PPAs and/or Post Activity Report (Prepared by

Facility) provided to low and the LGU - specifically stating the
moderate LGUs names of the LGUs provided with
intervention)

Component LGUs with BIDA Post Activity Report (Prepared by

Implementation that shall include the LGU) For Provinces:
any/all of the following: 25 points – with
● Pledge of Support submission of the
● Program implementation required three (3)
should target various MOVs and with
stakeholders such as, but additional MOVs
not limited, youth,
RPWUDs, SK, Students, 0 point – without
Out-of-School Youth, and complete
the general public submission of the
three (3) required
Program should have MOVs and/or no
engagements with either a CSO, additional MOVs
Faith-Based Organization, Private
Sector, or Parents-Teacher For Cities/
Association. Municipalities:
10 points – with
Activities such as, but not limited submission
to: (1) Catechism, (2) Recollection, 0 point – without
and (3) Youth Camp submission

Implementation of Drug Free Executive Order or any other

Workplace policy similar issuance

The LGU shall submit at least one (1) of any of the following
programs/activities:
*It is highly recommended that the LGU submit MOVs of all the
programs/activities.
Presence of Help line for anti- No of reports related to illegal
illegal drugs (e.g. RHU Helpline drugs received with appropriate
and LGU Helpline) action taken

Provision of information Post Activity Report (Prepared

dissemination on prosecution and
operations
(Can either be a program or
provision of funding)
by the LGU or a law
enforcement agency)
For provision of funding:
Certification from the Budget
Officer or Accountant

Any other program, activity, or Shall submit either of the

facility that supports the following:
implementation of the BIDA 1. Post Activity Report (prepared
Program by the LGU),
2. Certification, or
3. Recognition from any award
giving body

CRITERIA 1 – Implementation of Anti-Illegal Drugs Program

(FOR CITIES/MUNICIPALITIES ONLY)

MEANS OF CONDITIONS FOR HUCS/CITIES/MUNICIPALITIES:

VERIFICATION

High Functional Barangays with Moderate Functional Barangays

given that there are no Low Functional Barangays
● 65% - 100% - 15 points
BADAC ● 41% - 64% - 10 points
● 21% - 40% - 7 points
Functionality
● 20% and below – 5 points
Audit Result
High Functional Barangays with Moderate and Low Functional
Barangays

● 65% - 100% - 10 points

● 41% - 64% - 7 points
● 21% - 40% - 5 points
● 20% and below – 2 points

All Barangays are Moderate Functional

 ● 5 points

No High Functional Barangays

● 0 points

CRITERIA 2 – SUSTAINABILITY OF DRUG-CLEARED OR DRUG-FREE

STATUS

CONDITIONS MEANS OF VERIFICATION POINT

ALLOCATION

For Provinces: For Provinces: 25 points if the

1. Increased in number of PDEA National Data conditions are
drug-cleared C/M – 2022- met
2023
If the province is not 0 point if with
declared drug free or drug C/M/Bs with
cleared revoked status
2. 100% of C/Ms under the
province are drug-cleared/-
free
3. LGUs with any number of
C/M with revoked status is
automatically zero

For HUCs/ICCs/C/M: For HUCs/ICCs/C/Ms:

1. Increased in number of PDEA Certification

drug-cleared barangays –
(refer to Annex C)
2022-2023
If the city/municipality is not
declared drug free or drug
cleared
2. 100% of previously drug-
cleared barangay has
sustained status
3. 100% of previously drug-
free barangay has
sustained status
4. LGUs with any number of
barangays with revoked
status is automatically zero
CRITERIA 3 – IMPLEMENTATION OF CBDRP

CONDITIONS MEANS OF VERIFICATION POINT ALLOCATION

Provinces with CBDRP With Enrollees: 25 points – 80% -

100% of the CBDRP
All of the following MOVs shall be Graduates vs
uploaded: Enrollees

1. Certification stating the number 15 points – 50% -

and percentage of CBDRP 79% of the CBDRP
Graduates vs enrollees for the Audit Graduates vs
Year 2023, signed by the LCE and Enrollees
CBDRP Focal Person; and
10 points – 20% -
2. CBDRP Plan with approved or 49% of the CBDRP
accredited module or training Graduates vs
program; Enrollees
0 point – below 20%
of the CBDRP
Graduates vs
Enrollees is below
20% it is equivalent to
zero

Without Enrollees: 25 points – with

submission
All of the following MOVs shall be
uploaded: 0 point – no
submission
1. Certification stating that there is
no enrollees during the audit year
(2023), signed by the LCE and
CBDRP Focal Person;
3. CBDRP Plan with approved or
accredited module or training
program; and
 4. LADPA, highlight the activity and
the fund allocation or Certification
from the Budget Officer stating the
amount allocated for CBDRP

Provinces without CBDRP 1. Post Activity Report for 25 points – with

counterpart programs providing submission
technical / financial support to the
conduct of CBDRP of component 0 point – no
LGUs; or submission
2. Counterpart Programs in support
for CBDRP in partnership with any
CSOs, Faith-Based Organization, or
Private Sector supported by a
MOA/U, Resolution, or any other
equivalent issuances endorsing the
partnership

Cities/Municipalities with All of the following MOVs shall be 25 points – 80% -

Graduates uploaded: 100% of the CBDRP
Graduates vs
1. Certification stating the number Enrollees
and percentage of CBDRP
Graduates vs enrollees for the Audit 15 points – 50% -
Year 2023, signed by the LCE and 79% of the CBDRP
CBDRP Focal Person; Graduates vs
2. CBDRP Reporting Form 2; and Enrollees
3. CBDRP Plan with approved or
accredited module or training 10 points – 20% -
program; 49% of the CBDRP
4. Documentation regarding the Graduates vs
establishment and/or designation of Enrollees
a facility for CBDRP. 0 point – below 20%
of the CBDRP
5. Documentation stating the Graduates vs
program implementers (i.e., pastor, Enrollees is below
psychiatrist, law enforcer, and 20% it is equivalent to
partnership with other CSO/s) zero
Cities/Municipalities All of the following MOVs shall be 25 points – with
without Enrollees uploaded: submission

1. Certification stating that there is 0 point – no

no enrollees during the audit year submission
(2023), signed by the LCE and
CBDRP Focal Person, and
2. CBDRP Reporting Form 2;
3. CBDRP Plan with approved or
accredited module or training
program;
4. LADPA, highlight the activity and
the fund allocation or Certification
from the Budget Officer stating the
amount allocated for CBDRP
5. Documentation regarding the
establishment and/or designation of
a facility for CBDRP.

6. Documentation stating the

program implementers (i.e., pastor,
psychiatrist, law enforcer, and
partnership with other CSO/s)
CRITERIA 4 – REINTEGRATION

CONDITIONS MEANS OF VERIFICATION POINT ALLOCATION

Provinces with CBDRP With Graduates: 25 points – with

submission
1. Certification stating the number
and percentage of CBDRP 0 point – no submission
Graduates provided with livelihood
and/or technical assistance signed
by the LCE and the CBDRP Focal
Person

(refer to Annex I)

Without Graduates: 25 points – with

submission
1. LADPA highlight the specific
program for reintegration; or 0 point – no submission
2. Counterpart Programs in
support for reintegration program/s
in partnership with any CSOs,
Faith-Based Organization, or
Private Sector supported by a
MOA/U, Resolution, or any other
equivalent issuances endorsing
the partnership

Provinces without CBDRP 1. Post Activity Report for 25 points – with

counterpart programs providing submission
technical / financial support to the
conduct of CBDRP of component 0 point – no submission
LGUs; or

2. Counterpart Programs in
support for CBDRP in partnership
with any CSOs, Faith-Based
Organization, or Private Sector
supported by a MOA/U,
Resolution, or any other equivalent
issuances endorsing the
partnership
Cities/Municipalities with All of the following MOVs shall be 25 points – with
Graduates uploaded: submission

1. Certification stating the number 0 point – no submission

and percentage of CBDRP
*graduates provided with
livelihood and/or technical
assistance signed by the LCE and
the CBDRP Focal Person

*Number of graduates shall be

equivalent with the numbers
reported in ADAS

(refer to Annex I)

Cities/Municipalities All of the following MOVs shall be 25 points – with

without Graduates uploaded: submission

1. Certification stating that there 0 point – no submission

are no graduates during the audit
year (2023) and justification of why
there are no graduates, signed by
the LCE and CBDRP Focal
Person, and

2. LADPA, highlight the activity

and the fund allocation or
Certification from the Budget
Officer stating the amount
allocated for reintegration

RPWUDs involvement on RPWUDs shall be involved and/or

the Advocacy for Anti- expressed support in the
Illegal Drugs Campaign campaign against illegal drugs.
(i.e., speaker on advocacy
campaigns, ambassador for anti-
illegal drug campaign)
 Annex I

Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
DILG-NAPOLCOM Center, EDSA corner Quezon Avenue, Quezon City
www.dilg.gov.ph

DILG PHILIPPINE ANTI-ILLEGAL DRUGS STRATEGY -

PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICE

ANTI-DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL

PERFORMANCE AUDIT
CERTIFICATION FOR REINTEGRATION
 Insert
Logo
Here

NAME OF LGU
ADDRESS OF THE LGU

CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the (LGU Name) has (No.) of Community-Based Drug Rehabilitation Program
(CBDRP) Graduate/s, as reflected in the submitted Quarterly Reports for CY 2023. Stated below
are the breakdown of graduates provided with livelihood and/or employment:

NO. (%) OF NO. (%) OF NO. (%) OF

GRADUATES GRADUATES GRADUATES WITH
PROVIDED WITH PROVIDED WITH INVOLVEMENT ON
LIVELIHOOD EMPLOYMENT ADVOCACY
CAMPAIGN
TOTAL NO.
OF
GRADUATES

Furthermore the following are provided in partnership with (CSO, Name of Faith-Based
Organization, Name of Private Sector):

● Type of Livelihood/Employment – Name of CSO/Faith-Based Organization/Private Sector

All information stated herein and the attachments are accurate, correct, and complete in
accordance with the Republic of the Philippines' relevant laws, rules, and regulations.

Any misrepresentation made in this document or any of its attachments shall be subjected to
proper administrative action.

Issued this ___ day of ____, ____ at ___________________________________________

Prepared by:

SIGNATURE OVER PRINTED NAME

City/Municipality CBDRP Focal Person

Approved by:

SIGNATURE OVER PRINTED NAME

Local Chief Executive (LCE)