Share Link Desktop View

Premium Members Advanced Search Search Tips

Arms act section 25 recovery doctypes: madhyapradesh

Search

1 - 10 of 1726 (0.02 seconds) Relevance

Mohd. Jamil vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 August, 2004

appellant was acquitted for the offence punishable under Section 25 / 27 of Arms
Act as the recovery of 'Katta' was not found ... punishable under Section 25 / 27 ,
Arms Act, he should be acquitted from the offence under Section 302 , IPC on the
basis that recovery
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - A K Shrivastava - Full Document

Deepak Sen vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 26 December, 2023

established, whereas, for constituting offence under Section 25 (1-B)(b) of Arms
Act, 1959 , recovery of sharp edged weapon from his possession in public ... Arms
Act, 1959 , it is evident that one essential ingredient for constituting offence under
Section 25 (1-B)(b) of Arms Act, 1959 is recovery
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A K Paliwal - Full Document

Imtiyaz Khan @ Raj@ Raja @Rahul vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 25 April,
2019
Afzal Ahmad Khan have also been convicted under Section 25(1B)(a) of the Arms
Act and sentenced to R.I. for two years ... available that they entered into the bank
but on the basis of recovery of stolen articles, presumption has been drawn that
they were part
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 49 - Cited by 204 - S Dwivedi - Full Document

Ramsevak Kori vs State Of M.P. on 3 May, 2018

Arms Act . None appears for the appellant Raj Kumar who has been convicted
under Section 25(1-B) (b) of Arms Act . Since the arguments ... appellants for the
offence under Sections 25 (1-B) (a) and 25(1-B) (b) of Arms Act . Heard the
learned counsel for the parties
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 10 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Pramod Sahu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 20 December, 2016

offence punishable under Sections 307 , 323 , 294 / 34 of IPC and section 25 / 27
of Arms Act. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that ... help of Section 34 of
IPC. So far as recovery of gun is concerned offence under section 25 of Arms Act

https://indiankanoon.org/search/?formInput=Arms%20act%20section%2025%20recovery%20+doctypes:madhyapradesh 08/04/24, 11 23 PM
Page 1 of 4
:
 is triable
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

Arvind @ Akhendra Singh vs The State Of M.P. on 18 November, 2016

appellant of offfence under Section 302 of IPC. (19) So far as offence under
Section 25 / 27 of the Arms Act is concerned, when ... Section 27 of the Arms Act
and therefore, the trial court has committed an error in convicting of offence under
Section 27 of the Arms
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 1 - N K Gupta - Full Document

Vinod Kumar Shukla vs State Of M.P. on 20 April, 1999

Appellant Vinod Kumar Shukla has been convicted under Section 25(1)(a) of the
Arms Act, 1959 for unlawful possession of a firearm ... conviction of the appellant
for the offence punishable under Section 25 of the Arms Act. To the same effect is
the recent decision
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Makhan Vishwakarma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 26 August, 2021

relation to the offence punishable under Sections 392 , 34 of IPC and under
Section 11 / 13 of MPDVPK Act. It is submitted that the applicant ... having another
case registered for offence under Section 25 / 27 of the Arms Act. There is a
recovery of Rs.200/- and a purse from
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 1 - V Mishra - Full Document

The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Rajni Nagar on 6 November, 2015

recovered from the respondent Sanju Patel. However, by recovery of such firearm
no offence under Section 395 or 397 of I.P.C is made ... charge of offence under
Section 25 or 27 of th Arms Act against the respondent Sanju and therefore, by
recovery of a gun from respondent
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Ajay Tiwari Alias Krishna Kumar Tiwari vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 10
October, 2014
Rewa for the offence punishable under Section 394 of IPC and Section 25 / 27 of
the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that ... parade. There was
no recovery from the applicant which can constitute an offence punishable under
Section 25 / 27 of Arms Act. The applicant
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Search Within Results

Create Alert Get alerts for new judgments matching this query.

https://indiankanoon.org/search/?formInput=Arms%20act%20section%2025%20recovery%20+doctypes:madhyapradesh 08/04/24, 11 23 PM
Page 2 of 4
:
 RSS Feed for this query

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next

Filter Results by Filter by Tags

Document Types punishment-for-prohibited-arms
All special-power-of-high-court < power-of-high-court-regarding-bail
Laws punishment-for-using-arms
Judgments arms
Tribunals preparation-to-dacoity, commit-dacoity
Highcourts & Supremecourt assembling-to-commit-dacoity
Courts and Laws common-intention
Madhya Pradesh High indian-penal-code
Court murder
Authors attempt-to-murder
Vivek Agarwal Related Queries
Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia arms act
Vishal Mishra "arms act"
Naresh Kumar Gupta section 302 ipc
Atul Sreedharan section 302 indian penal code
Bench Arms act filter: sanction order of prosecution
Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia section 25 arms act
Vivek Agarwal section 27
Vishal Mishra no independent witness
Naresh Kumar Gupta section 399,
Atul Sreedharan corona virus
Sanjeev Sudhakar Kalgaonkar
Dipak Misra
Akhil Kumar Shrivastava
Achal Kumar Paliwal
Sanjay Dwivedi
Years
2018
2021
2022
2020
2023

https://indiankanoon.org/search/?formInput=Arms%20act%20section%2025%20recovery%20+doctypes:madhyapradesh 08/04/24, 11 23 PM
Page 3 of 4
:
 2016
2014
2017
2019
1999

https://indiankanoon.org/search/?formInput=Arms%20act%20section%2025%20recovery%20+doctypes:madhyapradesh 08/04/24, 11 23 PM
Page 4 of 4
: