Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cambridge International AS & A Level: Global Perspectives & Research For Examination From 2023
Cambridge International AS & A Level: Global Perspectives & Research For Examination From 2023
Cambridge International AS & A Level: Global Perspectives & Research For Examination From 2023
Specimen
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers. They should be applied alongside the specific
content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking
principles.
• the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
• the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
• the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 2:
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 3:
• marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit is given for valid answers which go beyond the
scope of the syllabus and mark scheme, referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
• marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
• marks are not deducted for errors
• marks are not deducted for omissions
• answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these features are specifically assessed by the
question as indicated by the mark scheme. The meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 4:
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed instructions or in the application of generic level
descriptors.
GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 5:
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question (however; the use of the full mark range may
be limited according to the quality of the candidate responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade
descriptors in mind.
The marking criteria are presented in a separate table for each assessment objective.
Annotation
• Annotations will be used by examiners as agreed during standardisation, and the meaning will be understood by all examiners who marked that
paper.
AO1a Analysis of AO1b Building AO1c Range of sources AO1d Appropriateness of AO1e Comparative
question perspectives sources evaluation
Undertakes a sustained Builds two (or more) Engages with a wide Assesses and justifies Offers a critical
analysis of a wide range coherent and contrasting range of source materials the appropriateness of the comparison of contrasting
of implications of the perspectives by covering diverse global key sources against perspectives which leads to
chosen question synthesising individual contexts a wide range of relevant a supported judgement
5 marks arguments, demonstrating 5 marks criteria 5 marks
critical insight into 5 marks
the links among source
material
5 marks
Undertakes a sustained Builds two coherent and Engages with a range of Assesses and justifies Offers a descriptive
analysis of some contrasting perspectives source materials covering the appropriateness of comparison of contrasting
implications of the chosen by synthesising individual diverse global contexts the key sources against a perspectives which leads
question arguments, demonstrating 4 marks range of relevant criteria to a supported judgement
4 marks awareness of the links 4 marks 4 marks
among source material
4 marks
Undertakes an analysis of Builds two contrasting Makes some reference Assesses the Offers a comparison of
some implications of the perspectives through the to a range of source appropriateness of a range contrasting arguments
chosen question juxtaposition of individual materials covering diverse of selected sources against which leads to a
3 marks arguments, demonstrating global contexts one or more criteria supported judgement
partial awareness of 3 marks 3 marks 3 marks
the links among source
material
3 marks
Identifies some Builds two contrasting Makes some reference to a Assesses the Attempts some
implications of the chosen perspectives through the range of source materials appropriateness of a comparison of contrasting
question juxtaposition of individual 2 marks single selected source arguments which leads to a
2 marks arguments 2 marks judgement
2 marks 2 marks
AO1a Analysis of AO1b Building AO1c Range of sources AO1d Appropriateness of AO1e Comparative
question perspectives sources evaluation
Identifies a specific Builds a single perspective Makes some reference to Asserts the Begins to compare
question or perspectives that have source material appropriateness of arguments
1 mark no effective contrast 1 mark selected source(s) 1 mark
1 mark 1 mark
No creditable response No creditable response No creditable response No creditable response No creditable response
0 marks 0 marks 0 marks 0 marks 0 marks
AO2 Reflection
AO2a Consideration of contrasting AO2b Reflection and impact on personal AO2c Further research
perspectives viewpoint
Demonstrates balance in considering Undertakes clear reflection on how the Justifies a specific suggestion for further
contrasting perspectives work carried out has affected the candidate’s research relevant to the chosen question
3 marks viewpoint 3 marks
3 marks
Considers elements of contrasting Undertakes some reflection on how the Identifies a specific suggestion for further
perspectives work carried out has affected the candidate’s research relevant to the chosen question
2 marks viewpoint 2 marks
2 marks
Offers generic acknowledgement of Presents minimal reflection on the work Suggests a generic requirement for further
contrasting perspectives carried out research relevant to the chosen question
1 mark 1 mark 1 mark
No creditable response No creditable response No creditable response
0 marks 0 marks 0 marks
AO3 Communication