Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Program: M.SC Sociology
Program: M.SC Sociology
Program: M.SC Sociology
SC SOCIOLOGY
ASSIGNMENT No. 2
The history of community organization has its roots in the late nineteenth
century. The Industrial Revolution in England in the mid-1800s had
transformed its economy from an agrarian to an industrial one. This in turn led
to the process of rapid urbanization, prompting many people in rural areas to
move to urban areas in search of livelihood. The urban areas with industries
became centers for exploitation, sickness, accidents, disabilities, unemployment,
and other socioeconomic issues. The families that strove to make ends meet
found it difficult to survive in these circumstances and were left with only a few
options to sustain themselves in the industrial centers: namely, government
relief, private charity or begging. It was commonly held that such individuals
and families were a failure due to their own weaknesses and deficiencies and
that their poverty and distress were born out of individual causes.
The first effort of its kind was the Elizabethan Poor Law (1601) in England,
which was set up to supply services to the needy. Another important landmark
in the history of community organization is the formation of London Society of
organizing charitable relief and repressing mendicancy and the Origin of the
Settlement House Movement in England during 1880.
Apart from this service, the COS also took initiatives in promoting co-operation
among the various welfare agencies. From this movement of charity
organization appeared many such service-oriented organizations i.e., social
service exchange, Community welfare councils, Councils of social agencies.
The emergence of The Settlement House MovementToynbee Hall in
Whitechapel was the first university settlement house set up in London in 1884
by a group of middle-class London reformers. It was started by Samuel Barnett
who believed that settlement houses were ‘places where richer students could
live alongside, learn about and contribute to the welfare of much poorer people.’
The Settlement workers were middle-class reformers, often women volunteers,
who would locate themselves in houses in the middle of urban, poor, working-
class neighborhoods. They conducted research in the surrounding communities
and offered services to community members, such as language classes,
childcare, healthcare, and meeting spaces.The Neighborhood Guild in New
York was the first American settlement house founded by Stanton Coit in 1886.
This was followed by the establishment of the Hull-House in Chicago in 1889
by Jane Addams and Ellen Starr. In 1893, a nurse and progressive reformer,
Lilian Wald founded the Henry Street Settlement in New York. By the 1890s,
there were at least four hundred settlement houses in the United States, of which
forty percent were in the industrial towns of Boston, Chicago, and New
York.Settlement workers were progressive in their approach because they aimed
to gain insights about poverty from directly experiencing the conditions under
which poor people lived. They also aimed to enable the poor to form
organizations to improve their situation. Some, aimed to build workers
organizations that would agitate for reform. This approach was a sharp
departure from nineteenth century styles of charity where the wealthy kept clear
boundaries and upheld their superiority in comparison with the poor. It tried to
solve social problems and bridging the class differences in rapidly
industrializing cities of USA, by acknowledging that poverty was caused by
social and economic factor e. Several innovative approaches were also evolving
in the field of community organization. The emphasis was now turning towards
control by community members instead of agency-driven activities as in the
case of the settlement houses of the 1930s. It was against this background that
Robert P. Lane’s 1939 report titled ‘The Field of Community Organization’
(also called ‘The Lane Report’) proved to be a milestone in social work
education.
Since President Obama has assumed leadership in the White House after
working as a community organizer in Chicago, community organizing has
become increasingly well-known for being an honorable profession.In short,
community organizers are responsible for uniting people to work together to
solve social problems and make the world a better place. If you are interested in
building more economically and socially just communities, read on to learn
more about the responsibilities of the role to get a better picture of the
typical day in the life of a community organizer.
Community Organizing
While most are familiar with the fact that medicine is dedicated to restoring
health and law is concerned with a body of rules for conduct, unfortunately very
few have a clear understanding on the world of community organizing. By most
definitions, community organizing is a specialized field in social work that is
devoted to restoring democracy at the grassroots level and energizing citizens to
become a more active member of their society. Community organizing focuses
on fixing broken social systems, bringing about meaningful changes to peoples'
lives, and empowering vulnerable or oppressed populations. Community
organizing has the goal of uniting local citizens around a common concern,
ranging from preventing crime and reducing toxic wastes to fighting prejudice
and creating community-building projects.
Q.4 What are the problems encountered during the community development?
How does a community developer overcome these problems?
A mild form of resistance to change is seen in the way people choose not to get
involved in the transformation process. However, those men and women who
did not participate in the community development program are considered as
untapped resources. With the right leader, they are able to “bring new human
capital, ideas, and diversity to the community development process” .
Any potential solution in dealing with apathy or the refusal to get involved must
start with information dissemination and education. These people must be
taught and they must understand the importance of community development.
Leaders on the other hand must not assume that the members of the community
are already familiar with the benefits of community development.
The collaboration of the private and public sector would result in improving
services such as garbage collection. At the same time, more people would be
involved in the monitoring of the delivery of services financed by public funds.
Members of the community would realise that an area riddled with crime could
never develop a sustainable engine of growth.
They also believed that their local officials would be able to apply certain
strategies in order to significantly reduce the crime rate. They believed that the
existence of a law enforcement group and the availability of public prosecutors
are enough to strike fear into the hearts of criminals. In the present time,
criminals are brazen enough to conduct their illegal trade on broad daylight.
Aside from securing the services of volunteers who are talented enough to
contribute in the creation of strategies, community development is also made
possible by empowering community members. For example, livelihood
programs may help provide a steady source of income for some of the members
of the community and it could be a major catalyst that would lead to change.
The root cause of the problem could be traced back to how people perceived
change and according to a commentary, “Change is nothing new and a simple
fact of life. Some people actively thrive on new challenges and constant change,
while others prefer the comfort of the status quo and strongly resist any change.
It is all down to the personality of the individual and there is little management
can do about resistance to change”. Change is important for the positive
transformation or renewal of a community ravaged by crime and poverty.
However, residents are oftentimes unwilling to embrace change. One of the
primary reasons identified in related literature is the inability to absorb the
impact of change.
Even if the members of the community are not open to change, community
leaders must persuade them. Needless to say, leadership is the key to an
effective and efficient community development process. Leaders must help
them understand that the community could be compared to a business entity that
requires change and innovation.
Without a doubt, political and civic leaders believe in the concept of community
development. However, their belief and enthusiasm are limited to the
conceptual level only because they are committed to the ideals of community
development but not the process. In reality, even leaders oppose change and
they are not willing to embrace change because there are so many things to
consider.
The unpredictable nature of change may affect their political careers. At the
same time, real transformation requires hard work. Many people are unwilling
to provide such level of commitment. According to the study made on the
transformation process, change can be seen as the cause of “unanticipated
delays, costs, and instabilities”
In other words, leaders must change the perspective regarding the benefits of
change. Leaders oftentimes resist the implementation of certain because it is not
to their advantage. In other occasions, a leader failed to deliver because of the
inability to overcome problems placed before him .
Community leaders must come to realise that, in order to reap the benefits
caused by change, they must be ready to make sacrifices. They have to make the
necessary adjustments in order to satisfy the requirements of a particular
strategy .
It is important to point out that the change process begins at the top. Leaders
must be persuaded first, before the followers are expected to embrace their
programs. In the case of the leaders, the change process begins in studying the
intricacies of the change process.
After residents of the community are involved and funding has been released,
the next step is to look for ways on how to improve the change processes. It is a
prerequisite to efficiency and waste reduction
Q.5