Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S Plasma For Aquaponics. Trends in Biotechnology
S Plasma For Aquaponics. Trends in Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Review
Global environmental, social, and economic challenges call for innovative Highlights
solutions to food production. Current food production systems require advances Population growth increases the pres-
beyond traditional paradigms, acknowledging the complexity arising from sus- sure on agricultural systems, depleting
resources and causing pollution.
tainability and a present lack of awareness about technologies that may help
limit, for example, loss of nutrients from soil. Aquaponics, a closed-loop system Aquaponics systems combine aqua-
that combines aquaculture with hydroponics, is a step towards the more efficient culture with hydroponics in a single
management of scarce water, land, and nutrient resources. However, its large-scale closed-loop system, where plant
waste sustains the growth of fish food
use is currently limited by several significant challenges of maintaining desirable
(e.g., larvae and worms), and fish
water chemistry and pH, managing infections in fish and plants, and increasing waste provides nutrients to plants,
productivity efficiently, economically, and sustainably. This paper investigates thus reducing their physical, environ-
the opportunities presented by plasma technologies in meeting these challenges, mental, and economic footprint.
potentially opening new pathways for sustainability in food production. Scale-up of aquaponics systems is hin-
dered by the need to maintain a fine bal-
ance between conditions that sustain
optimal productivity in intensive fish,
Aquaponics in the modern world plant, and nitrifying bacteria populations
Agriculture is increasingly under pressure from the growing global demand for food, competition for while mitigating pathogenic infections.
resources (i.e., land, water, energy, and labour), changes in production and consumption trends,
The use of plasmas in aquaponic sys-
and climate change. Food production systems need to adapt to cope with these challenges tems may help to resolve several key
by maximising their production efficiency and minimising their need for resources and reducing challenges such as disease and water-
environmental pollution associated with the use of fertilisers, pesticides and antimicrobials [1,2]. quality management, including removal
of pathogens and pollutants, enhance-
ment of plant growth, and extension of
Traditional monocrop agriculture (see Glossary) relies on the use of large areas of arable land, an the freshness and safety of perishable
increasingly scarce resource, degrading its quality in the process. Because this system is open-loop, plant and fish products.
the tremendous volumes of water and chemicals (such as pesticides and fertilisers), are not retained,
and become pollutants for oceans and waterways [3–5]. Closed-loop intensive farming systems
offer an opportunity to retain and reuse water and nutrients [6,7], with hydroponics and aquaponics
using a mere 10–30% of the fresh water used by conventional agriculture [6,7]. They are also less
susceptible to extreme heat and rain events and climate change-related reductions in precipitation
and water availability that hamper crop productivity in conventional agriculture. Of the two systems,
hydroponics is limited by the need for a continuous supply of plant nutrients. At the same time, the 1
Product Development, BudMore Pty
process is simpler, as water chemistry is optimised for the needs of the plants. Ltd, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
2
School of Engineering, College of
Engineering and Computer Science, The
In contrast, aquaponics synergistically combines aquaculture and hydroponics in a single loop, Australian National University, Canberra,
where microorganisms and plants use fish waste as a nutrient source, and in doing so maintain ACT 2600, Australia
3
School of Mechanical, Medical and
water quality at the levels suitable for healthy growth of substantial stocks of fish and crustaceans. Process Engineering, Faculty of
These productivity gains and environmental savings come at the cost of a greater system and Engineering, Queensland University of
process complexity, where optimal growth conditions have to be sustained for three very different Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000,
Australia
groups of organisms [8–10]. 4
School of Science, RMIT University, PO
Box 2476, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
5
Of the challenges that limit the use of aquaponics [11], the most critical are cost and technical com- Plasma Sources and Applications
Centre, National Institute of Education,
plexity of infrastructure needed to sustain stable pH and water chemistry, microbial and algae bloom Nanyang Technological University,
control, and problems associated with the management of disease in fish and plant crops [12]. Singapore 637616
In this review article we discuss the opportunities and challenges of integrating plasma systems
with aquaponics.
Figure 1 (Key figure) shows a concept architecture for a ‘smart’ aquaponics system, where
plasma is used in conjunction with automation and artificial intelligence (AI) to enable continued
water quality monitoring and delivery of plasma-generated effects optimised for a specific task.
These tasks include control of pathogen load, degradation of chemicals and waste products,
stimulation of animal and plant growth and maturation, plasma-enhanced aeration, and optimisa-
tion of water chemistry at different points within the system.
Various factors affect the agricultural productivity... From agro - to aqua Aquaponic cycle
could help!
Only 37.3% is agriculture land
Water scarcity
Nitrobacteria
Filter water
NO3
37.3% AQUAPONICS
Land degradation
CYCLE
Increase NO2
in population
CO2 NH3+ NH 4
Ammonia
Carbon footprint Loss of biodiversity Nitrosomonas
Trends in Biotechnology
Figure I. From agro to aqua: plasma can enhance benefits derived from aquaculture. Left: a schematic
representation of various factors that affect agricultural productivity. Right: from agro to aqua: aquaponic systems hold
strong potential as a sustainable food production platform and an alternative to conventional agriculture. The cycle
begins when protein introduced in the form of fish feed is consumed by fish and then excreted as ammonia into the
recirculating water. In addition to being the waste product from protein metabolism excreted by fish, ammonia can also
form during microbial decomposition of organic matter. Increased feed inputs needed to sustain high fish densities lead
to greater ammonia concentrations. Ammonia nitrogen is typically present in both ammonia (NH 3) and less toxic
ammonium (NH4+) forms in a pH- and water-temperature-dependent equilibrium (NH3 + H+ = NH4+). Nitrifying bacteria
(Nitrosomonas spp.) convert NH3 to nitrite (NO2– ) as NH3 + O2 → NO2 + 3H+ + 2e–, which is in turn converted to more
stable nontoxic NO3– by Nitrobacter spp. via NO2– + H2O → NO3 + 2H+ + 2e–. This nitrate is then absorbed by plants.
Box 2. Plasma–liquid interface: possibilities for aquaponics Plasma discharge: an ionised gas
When plasma interacts with the surface of a liquid, several types of representative effects can take place. Some of these consisting of positive and negative
effects are listed here and illustrated in Figure I; however, the complexity of chemical and physical processes in the gas and charges and a large number of reactive
liquid phases and at the interface makes their deconvolution challenging. Some of the frequently observed phenomena species.
that may induce measurable effects in liquids used in aquaponics systems include [90,91]: Reactive chemical species: a term
used to collectively describe species
• Strong electric current-induced electrohydraulic shocks. with significant chemical reactivity,
• Generation and propagation of radiation of considerable intensity through liquid media. including radicals (such as superoxide
• Ultrasonically induced cavitation and related phenomena. radical anion and hydroxyl radical) and
• High-voltage pulse-induced electric breakdowns between conducting surfaces (e.g., electrodes) in liquids. nonradicals (such as hydrogen
• Reactive chemistry arising from diffusion of reactive species from bulk plasma, interactions between molecules in liquid peroxide). In the context of aquaponics,
and incident plasma-generated energetic species, and cascade chemical reactions. most of these are oxygen- and nitrogen-
• Generation of exotic excited states of molecules and atoms through interactions between molecules in gas and liquid containing species.
with strong UV and other excited species; and many others. Sessile state: a state in which
microorganisms live and grow attached
Evidently, such a rich diversity of processes that can take place simultaneously and affect and be affected by each other to a surface, often forming a biofilm that
presents a considerable challenge for detection and quantification of potentially relevant species such as exotic excited acts as a protective barrier against
states of molecules, atoms, and their attribution to specific processes. Figure I shows some of the charge-transfer physical and chemical damage.
processes that take place at plasma–liquid interfaces. Modelling efforts provide some insights into the formation and
lifetime of these species, yet gaps still exist in our understanding of these processes.
Configurations of the liquid–plasma interface also play a role in defining the dynamics of species generation, adding to the
challenges of developing a comprehensive toolbox [92]. To maximise process efficiency and tailor the plasma system to a
particular application, configurations that utilise more than one source of energy for excitation of species can be used,
giving rise to highly desired and sometimes unique synergistic effects that would be difficult to realise outside these hybrid
systems. Examples of how these synergies can be used span applications from marine antifouling technology [93],
hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity control [94] to targeted therapy [95] and cancer treatment [96].
Electrohydraulic
Plasma
shocks and many others
UV radiation Free electrons
Self-organization
at Plasma–water
Electric fields interface
Plasma-surface
sheath E Energy + liquid
Deformation Evaporation
of liquid surface
Short-living species, radicals and electrons Undersheath water layer
Diffusion
Heat transfer
Trends in Biotechnology
Figure I. Plasma at liquid interface: an extended set of capabilities. Strongly nonequilibrium processes in liquids
driven by plasma-generated effects can be harnessed to control the properties of liquids and the behaviour of living
cells and organisms. Some of these processes are yet to be identified or their potential explored. An electric field is
present in the plasma-surface sheath between the bulk plasma and electrically charged surface of a liquid. In the under-
sheath water layer, short-living species, radicals, and electrons are present.
and plant populations, as it has been shown to effectively kill pathogens in their planktonic state
and sessile state and to remove even thick biofilms from living and artificial surfaces with minimal
harm to host species. It also stabilises water quality to prevent the growth of undesirable microbial
species.
Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) is a source of high electric fields, energetic charged particles,
ultrasound, UV light, and even shockwaves. When placed in contact with water, plasma can gen-
erate a significant amount of hydroxyl radicals and hydrogen peroxide, ozone, singlet oxygen,
nitrate radicals, and superoxides at the interface, which can then penetrate into the water [13].
In this respect, the plasma–liquid interaction is the source of the very same chemical agents
used in conventional sterilisation [14], as well as in advanced oxidation-based degradation of
organic compounds such as volatile organic compounds, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, and
care products in wastewater streams. At higher doses, CAP can decompose organic molecules
in water by a series of chemical reactions (such as abstraction and addition) and physical pro-
cesses (such as plasma-induced heating). The compounds in solution are first converted into
lower-molecular-weight molecules, and ultimately into water, carbon dioxide, and essentially
harmless mineral acids and salts. Plasma-generated species increase electrical conductivity
and levels of dissolved oxygen, decrease chemical oxygen demand (COD) and pH values, and
degrade waste molecules and eliminate foul odour to better support fish and plant growth,
making aquaponics systems more suitable for use in areas with a high population density.
These properties make CAP a promising technology to recover clean water from wastewater
streams, such as those produced by abattoirs. Wastewater generation in abattoirs is significant,
with estimated 10–11 kl per tonne of carcase weight produced in large integrated export facilities,
and 3–5 kl per tonne in small domestic facilities in Australia [15]. With increasing scarcity and demand
for fresh water supplies, and consequent increased financial costs of water, there is a growing
pressure for large industrial water users, including abattoirs, to use water more efficiently.
For this reason, abattoirs are increasingly being seen as not necessarily polluting but as a nutrient
resource that can be captured through integrating farming practices [16]. In some Asian coun-
tries, integrated livestock fish aquaculture introduces animal excreta and urine into fish ponds
to enhance the biological productivity of ponds by stimulating growth of plankton and other
microorganisms eaten by the fish [17]. In Australia, the integration of meat and livestock effluent
and aquaculture has chiefly been limited to primary algal production [18]. However, this can be
extended to polycultures using commercially valuable species such as carp and silver perch
that can feed on phytoplanktonic, zooplanktonic, and benthic food resources resulting from the
primary production [19]. At the same time, this will lead to improvement in wastewater quality, for ex-
ample, a significant reduction in nutrient load and increase in dissolved oxygen levels. However, for
the integrated system to be effective and profitable, several issues need to be resolved.
The combined wastewater output contains organic matter with high levels of nitrogen and phospho-
rus, a wide range of potentially pathogenic microorganisms, some quantities of cleaning and disinfec-
tion chemicals, and trace amounts of toxic compounds, hormones, and heavy metals [20].
Depending on the waste stream, the organic matter can vary from ‘green’ waste from manure,
paunch wastes, stockyard washing, and emptying of the animal stomachs, to ‘red’ waste with
high protein, blood and fat content from carcase washing. The temperature of wastewater can also
range from cool to hot. As such, it cannot be discharged directly into a fishpond [17,19]. First, waste-
water needs to be pretreated (e.g., via polymeric chemical coagulation and flocculation) to reduce the
level of suspended solids, fats, oils, and grease. This requires a multistep process that is expensive to
install and maintain. For example, for stickwater treatment, a membrane-based vibratory shear
enhanced process (VSEP) would require a capital investment of several hundred thousand of dollars
to install a system capable of processing 30 kl per day, with processing costs per kl of >$4.00
[15,16,19,21]. Yet this system would not be able to remove either microorganisms or pollutants,
and its efficacy would be affected by the temperature and volume of the effluent.
Biological and chemical treatment of abattoir wastewater is also challenging due to its unique
composition, where the amount of dissolved oxygen needed by chemical reactions or aerobic
biological organisms to break down organic material (expressed as the COD or biological oxygen
demand, BOD) is high. Even after pretreatment, suspended solids from the wastewater can
cause high water turbidity (200−400 nephelometric turbidity units, NTU) and thus prevent sunlight
needed for algal photosynthesis from penetrating deep into the water [15,16,21]. The growth of
algal species, Chlorella and Chlamydomonas species, is needed to absorb CO2 produced by
bacterial breakdown of organic matter in the effluent and to produce oxygen to meet the respira-
tion needs of those bacteria.
Furthermore, the pretreated wastewater still contains high levels of N and P (up to 150 mg/l
ammonia and around 5 mg/l phosphate) that need to be managed in order to prevent their
accumulation in the matter settling on the bottom of ponds that can lead to toxic blue-green algal
(cyanobacterial) blooms [19]. Until the pond is stabilised and the balance between algae (e.g., a
commercially significant Chlorella vulgaris) and bacterial populations are attained, the levels of
ammonia (100–150 mg/l) and water pH in the pretreated water will in most cases exceed the
upper tolerance limits of most fish species, affecting fish survival and growth [19]. However,
pond stabilisation is time- and resource-consuming. Moreover, in order for aerobic biological
organisms to break down organic material present in wastewater, significant amounts of
dissolved oxygen have to be introduced into the water. This is addressed by aeration to promote
carbon assimilation, ammonification, and nitrification by the aerobic bacterial community, and to
maintain a pH that favours the growth of desired microbial communities.
Unlike conventional methods that rely on sequential removal of expected groups of hazards from
abattoir wastewaters – microbiological (pathogens such as Escherichia coli, and spoilage organisms),
chemical (‘micropollutants’ such as disinfection by-products and hormones), and physical
(macrocontaminants) – CAP systems have the capacity to achieve this goal more efficiently,
especially if renewable energy (e.g., solar energy directly from solar panels or via a battery) to
create and sustain an electric discharge is used.
Effectively, this means that plasma treatment can be used to efficiently decontaminate wastewater,
as well as to convert concentrated stickwater into a mixture of higher-value compounds that can be
used as precursors for biofuels, growth media for industrial fermentation, and other uses.
Infection mitigation
Infection mitigation in a dynamic complex system comprising species from multiple kingdoms is
not trivial. Plants and animals in an aquaponics system can be infected by a broad spectrum of
pathogens [22,23]. However, the available treatment options are limited as the recirculating
water is shared by plants, fish, and beneficial microorganisms. Where in conventional aquaculture
chlorination or ozonation may be suitable, these can only be used in between growth cycles in
aquaponics, with administration of organism-specific drugs and antibiotics as the only viable op-
tion during the growth cycle [11]. However, prolonged use of antibiotics leads to the emergence
of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms of greater concern for the health of their host and poten-
tially the human consumer. Furthermore, antibiotics from commercial aquaculture persist in the
environment, with traces often found in water bodies [24]. Most fertilisers, pesticide and insecti-
cides used to manage airborne and waterborne plant infections are toxic to aquatic life. Isolation
of causal agents, efficient detection/monitoring of the disease, controlled application of chemicals
(pesticides) or use of natural pesticides, and so on, are some of the currently adopted practices
for infection management in aquaponics systems [22].
CAP is emerging as a feasible option to control infectious diseases in terrestrial and aquatic species.
Certain plant defence responses to biotic and abiotic stresses are coordinated by endogenous
reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS) [25]. The mechanism by which CAP induces death
in pathogens is also largely mediated by RONS. Plasma-generated RONS may also stimulate
oxidative and nitrosative signalling and the production of defence hormones (e.g., salicylic acid
and jasmonic acid) in plants [26]. Coupling of the plants’ self-defence mechanisms with that of
CAP-generated RONS may thus improve outcomes for disease control in plants [27,28].
On surfaces [29,30], inactivation of disease-causing bacteria, viruses, and fungi may involve
direct reactive species-induced damage of cell membrane and erosion of protective extracellular
polymeric substances, oxidative stress, and damage to intracellular proteins and lipids [31,32].
RONS induce DNA breaks and interfere with critical repair processes in cells [33]. The influx of
RONS across cell membranes causes fluctuation in the intracellular pH, damaging cells which are
unable to maintain pH homeostasis [34]. The accumulation of charged particles on the surface of
bacteria can lead to cellular damage due to electrostatic interactions. Plasma-generated UV
photons can hinder replication via dimerisation of the thymine base, and via bacterial spore
inactivation (Figure 2A) [35].
Excited singlet oxygen atom O(1D) has an important role in the inactivation of fungi by causing wrinkles
in the spores of the fungal hyphae [36]. Cell leakage and viability loss through cell membrane damage,
and degradation of vesicles and conidiophores of fungi also takes place (Figure 2B).
When in contact with water, plasma (CAP) generates what is known as plasma-activated
water (PAW), also commonly referred to as plasma-treated water (PTW). PAW is enriched
with RONS, and its physicochemical properties (such as pH and conductivity) can be varied by
controlling the type and duration of plasma treatment. PAW can also inhibit germination of fungal
spores (Figure 2C) and cause apoptosis-inducing physiological changes in fungi [37].
A significant decrease in the biofilm burden on skin was demonstrated in fish grown in a plasma-
enhanced tank [38]. Figure 2D illustrates that even a brief daily treatment was sufficient to reduce
the size of the infected area. Viral proteins were also shown to be sensitive to RONS, with rapid
denaturation of bacteriophage lambda proteins causing phage inactivation (Figure 2E) [39,40].
Although pH depends on a multitude of factors, its fluctuations are mainly attributed to fish
excreta and the activity of microbes living in the system. Fish excrete ammonia which increases
the pH of the water, potentially harming fish (by denaturing proteins in the their cell walls),
retarding plant growth, and also inhibiting the survival of preferred bacterial species. Ammonia-
oxidising Nitrosomonas spp. and nitrite-oxidising Nitrobacter spp. convert NH3 into NO2 and
subsequently into plant-available NO3, also releasing H+ ions to lower the pH. In addition to the
natural mechanisms, nutrient supplementation (where carbonate, bicarbonate or hydroxide is
added) and fluidised lime-bed reactors that release dissolved limestone into the water are used to
help manage ammonia, yet these may increase water alkalinity [44]. Minor loss of ammonia can
also take place in heavily aerated ponds. Although CAP may reduce the number of nitrifying bacteria,
it may have a positive effect on the ammonia neutralisation cycle via water acidification, facilitating the
reduction of NH3 into NH4+ that takes place at lower pH. This drop in pH traps NH3 and adds a mol-
ecule of NO3, thus increasing the availability of an immediately accessible nitrogen source for plants.
Trends in Biotechnology
Figure 2. Antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral mechanisms of cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) and plasma-activated water (PAW). (A) CAP can damage
virtually every component of a bacterial cell. (B) Schematic representation of the antifungal mechanism of CAP. (C) Exposure of water to CAP results in PAW rich in reactive
species that can be used to hinder conidial germination of Colletotrichum alienum, a pathogen known to cause postharvest anthracnose and rot in apple, banana, and
avocado fruit [37]. (D) Healing of bacterial skin infection in blood parrot cichlid fish housed in a plasma-enhanced fish tank [38]. (E) Transmission electron microscopy
(TEM) images of viral T4 bacteriophages treated with CAP and PAW [39]. Aggregation of T4 bacteriophages is attributed to oxidation of their cysteine-rich domains.
Prolonged CAP/PAW exposure completely degraded the envelope that enclosed the nucleic acid, and significantly modified RNA sequences via damage from reactive
oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS) and UV (in the case of CAP). Damage to spike proteins and genetic material may prevent the fusion of the virus with its host cells,
or may trigger apoptosis of infected cells. All images reprinted, with permission, from [37–39]. Abbreviations: PDA, potato dextrose agar; CP, cold plasma.
CAP is very effective in controlling the pH of a system through chemical reactions between
plasma-generated electrons, free radicals, photons, excites molecules, positive and negative
ions with water [45]. Prolonged plasma treatment often leads to the formation of strong acids
[46] (e.g., nitric and peroxynitrous acid) and hydrogen peroxide [47], and a reduction in pH [48]. It
has also been shown that the combination of both nonthermal and thermal plasma can create a
controlled pH from 0 to 7 in treated liquids. By generating plasma using different systems (e.g.,
atmospheric pressure micro-arc discharge or micro-jet device configurations), and by varying
gas chemistry, treatment duration and treated volume, size of plasma–liquid interface, and dis-
tance from the plume, different values of pH can be attained. In general, a greater concentration
of reactive oxygen species (ROS)was found for water samples treated using argon discharges,
whereas treatment air discharges produced water with greater levels of reactive nitrogen species
(RNS) and greater changes in pH and electrical conductivity. Importantly, water thus treated
showed relatively good stability with respect to pH, electrical conductivity, and levels of hydrogen
peroxide and nitric acid [49]. Furthermore, acidic pH is beneficial for reactive species transport
across microbial cell walls. Plasma-generated RONS also decrease the resistance of microorgan-
isms to acidic conditions [50,51].
Management of aquaponics waste using CAP may offer a simpler, energy- and cost-efficient,
eco-friendly alternative to conventional methods, as it does not require the use of any chemical
agents. Pulsed electrical discharges can be particularly efficient for organic waste decomposition
in water. Being a source of strong electric fields, reactive particles such as UV light, oxidative spe-
cies, reductive species, ultrasound, etc., plasma can decompose waste materials more efficiently
than traditional methods. The mechanism of degradation by plasma may include electron collision
as well as photolysis or pyrolysis involving plasma-generated molecular and ionic species [54]. In
some systems, during plasma discharge a significant increase in temperature may take place,
and with a finite volume of water hindering the spread of plasma, high pressure may be gener-
ated. In an incompressible medium, the generated high pressure leads to shockwaves. Recent
developments in plasma technology specifically designed to efficiently eradicate or cause com-
plete demineralisation of pollutants has been gaining increased attention [55]. As an example,
Figure 3A illustrates a multielectrode system developed for the decomposition of pollutants in
water, using the gliding arc discharge (GAD) technology. In the gliding arc system, divergent elec-
trodes are mounted orthogonally to a plane, and processing gases used for plasma generation
are injected through a port under the symmetry axis of electrodes. Once initiated, the arc glides
in the direction of the gas flow, elongating to a point when is no longer sufficient to maintain the
self-sustained discharge. Once that critical length of the arc is reached, it will become
extinguished, interrupting the current and at the same time forming a new arc [56].
Trends in Biotechnology
Figure 3. Plasma for the decomposition of contaminants, stimulation of seed germination, and improved food storage and safety. (A) Schematic diagram
of a gliding arc discharge system for plasma-based decomposition of pollutants in water [56]. (B) Plasma-generated reactive oxygen species (ROS) can promote seed
germination by acting as a signal molecule to interfere with seed dormancy. Specifically, hydrogen peroxide activates and upregulates the catalase (CAT) genes. (C)
Schematic representation of production of plasma-activated water (PAW) ice for storing seafood. Ice produced from PAW is free from microbes, which prolongs the
shelf life of the shrimp, whereas ice produced using tap water (TW) can result in the early spoilage of the shrimp [69]. (D) Washing process of raw foodstuff using
plasma-treated water (PTW) or TW as a reference with the aim to extend useful shelf-life and retain quality (colour and texture) in the prewashed produce [73].
(E) Prawns stored in TW ice (A) and PAW ice (B) for 9 days [69]. All images reprinted, with permission, from [56,69,73].
increasing its wettability, promoting subsequent water uptake, which in turn helps to trigger the
processes associated with germination.
PAW/PTW contains high levels of RONS, such as hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radicals, ozone,
nitric oxide, superoxide, etc. [59]. PAW can potentially double seed germination and promote
subsequent stages of seedling growth. RONS (e.g., hydroxyl radical, superoxide, hydrogen per-
oxide, and atomic oxygen) and UV can assist seed germination by inactivating seed diseases and
enhancing antioxidant defence mechanisms in plants [60]. Germination- and growth-stimulating
ROS are generated by the mitochondria in cells. The interaction between these natural reactive
species and the additional ROS produced in PAW promotes quicker seed germination [61]
by breaking down seed dormancy and activating catalase genes [62]. H2O2 in PAW can help
to control transcription processes, such as the production of antioxidants and gibberellic acid,
brassinosteroids, ethylene, auxin, and abscisic acid, hormones responsible for seed dormancy
and seed germination [63]. Moreover, RNS in PAW affects the phytochrome activity of seeds,
changing light requirements for seed germination. ROS in PAW can act as intracellular chemical
signals in seeds and seedlings, positively affecting their growth [64], and engage in thiol oxidation
or protein carbonylation.
At later growth stages, exposing plants at seed and seedling stages to RONS stimulation may
induce a wide range of stress responses by upregulating the transcription of defence and repair
molecules in their cells. Modulation of growth parameters is also likely, with changes in the phys-
ical dimensions of leaves, shoots, and roots, and the transition between distinct growth stages
reported in plants in response to PAW. Here, balancing ROS molecules (e.g., H2O2 and O2–) is crit-
ical for promoting desirable processes such as root growth and root hair development [65], leaf
development, and pollen tube growth, as excessive RONS stress may trigger deformities,
senescence, and death in plants. Nitrates generated in PAW through oxidation and reduction
of N2 may provide an alternative nitrogen source for plant growth, although this should be man-
aged carefully to maintain the nitrogen cycle and reduce the formation of toxic nitrogen species.
Importantly, PAW-mediated reduction in the disease burden may be one of the most critical
contributions to healthy plant development. In short, PAW holds great promise for improving
plant growth and crop yield while reducing harvest time.
Food quality and safety can be further improved using CAP, as it is capable of breaking down
surface contaminants on foods that may be harmful to human health (e.g., pesticides and other
agrochemicals), allowing for their controlled application to eradicate plant and fish diseases that
cannot be managed by CAP/PAW alone. Residues of pesticides (e.g., water-soluble hexachlorocy-
clohexane and endosulfan) may persist on surfaces after washing, whereas thermal or chemical
treatment may produce toxic degradation by-products and reduce food quality. ROS (particularly
O2–, OH, and O3), N2, and UV are particularly important in oxidation of P=S bonds and cleavage of Outstanding questions
P–S and S–C bonds [72]. Figure 3D and E illustrate the application of PAW for the quality- Can the multiple factors generated by
retaining food processing and storage [73]. plasma at scale be controlled with the
necessary precision and efficacy to
deliver the desired effects in such a
Concluding remarks and future perspectives complex, multiorganism dynamic
Aquaponics is a very effective farming method that uses 90% less water and other resources system?
when compared to the traditional farming approaches, promising economic, social, and environ-
Can sustained and/or repeated
mental sustainability, diverse food products where space is restricted, more efficient utilisation of
exposure of fish, plant and microbial
resources, and reduced pollution. (both desirable nitrifying and
pathogenic) populations to plasma-
Applied at different stages and points in the aquaculture system, CAP can facilitate the delivery generated effects lead to short- and/
or long-term changes in their pheno-
of these benefits through rapid and efficient (in terms of rates of produce generation, kg/m3) type or genotype?
on-demand production of transient chemical and physical effects for chemical-free disinfection,
water quality management, organic waste disintegration, ammonia neutralisation, and drug- Can the at-scale plasma systems be
free growth stimulation [40]. sufficiently competitive to replace
traditional chemical and physical
methods of mitigation currently used
In doing so, it may help overcome current challenges of commercial scaling, particularly providing in aquaponics?
a compact system to replace currently used complex processes and infrastructure for pathogen
Can renewable sources provide a
load management, ammonia removal via biofilters, and solid waste management with filters.
reliable source of energy for initiating
and sustaining plasma, and what are
Leaving no residue and removing traces of pesticides and agrichemicals, CAP and PAW may the cost, infrastructure and footprint,
extend the useful life of food with zero chemicals. and environmental implications of
renewables-driven plasma?
Certain types of treatment may even induce genetic or phenotypic changes in fish, increasing
productivity [74].
Yet, for the practical realisation of such plasma-enhanced aquaponics architectures, several
questions need to be answered (see Outstanding questions). Among them is a cost/benefit anal-
ysis of using plasma instead of conventional chemicals and filtration, scaling up while maintaining
energy efficiency, and in-depth understanding of dosing in a complex system.
Potential challenges
As an emerging technology for aquaponics, CAP is still rapidly evolving, with only a limited num-
ber of early adopters attempting to understand the most feasible way to implement plasma
technology in aquaponics. In part, the diversity of available plasma systems and complexity
of physical and chemical processes that may take place in a plasma/liquid/organism system
makes comparison, optimisation, and integration of CAP into aquaponics set-ups more
challenging. Additionally, it is still not clear to what extent plasma-generated reactive
species – individually and in combination with other species and chemicals – bring in desired
degradation effects before they reach levels at which the health of organisms in an industrial system
become affected. Indeed, it is critical to make a comprehensive assessment of all aspects of
plasma interactions with living organisms at a molecular, cellular, tissue, and systems level to
understand necessary plasma doses, toxicity of plasma-generated species to fish, invertebrates,
and plants, and the relationship between the plasma source and those parameters across
the system.
While a comprehensive outline of published literature (e.g., [75]) is outside the scope of this
review, a summary of relevant examples that demonstrate capabilities of different types of plasma
system can be found in Table 2, offering a general idea of their characteristic powers, doses, and
other key parameters.
Table 2. Parameters of plasma and effects on various types of plants and animals which can be grown in an aquaponics system
Product Plasma typea Plasma parameters Treatment outcomes Refs
Zebra fish (Danio rerio) NAP 100 V, 60 Hz, 30 s, argon Evaluated the in vivo safety of plasma devices [78]
White shrimps DBD 40 kV, 500 Hz, 10 min, air Improved physicochemical properties during [79]
(Litopenaeus vannamei) storage; improved shelf life
Blood parrot cichlid fish (Cichlasoma synspilum × Microbubble/DBD 4 kV, 40 W, 15 min Reduced biofilm formation and improved health [38]
Cichlasoma citrinellum) (40 s daily) status of fish
Peas (Pisum sativum ‘Salamanca’) DBD 6–12 kV, 20 MHz, 5 min, air Germination, growth, photosynthesis of sprouts [80]
and seedlings
Blueberries (Vaccinium sect. Cyanococcus) APP 47 kHz, 549 W, 30–60 s, air Reduced native microflora on fresh blueberries [81]
Cherry tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum) DBD 100 kV, 150 s, air Microbial reduction by 3.5 log units [82]
Romaine lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. longifolia) DBD 42.6 kV, 1.5 A, 10 min, air Microbial reduction by 0.4–0.8 log [83]
Strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa) DBD 60 kV, 50 Hz, 5 min air Microbial reduction by 2.4–3.3 log [84]
Spinach (Spinacia oleracea) HVPP 6 kV, 0.7 kA, 1–5 shots Improved seed germination [85]
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) FRD 80 W, 13.56 MHz, 15 s, Microbial inactivation and improved plant growth [86]
helium
Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) DBD 60 kV, 20.52–46.17 W, Microbial reduction; improved shelf life [87]
4 min, air
a
Abbreviations: NAP, nonthermal argon plasma; DBD, dielectric barrier discharge; APP, atmospheric pressure plasma; HVPP, high-voltage pulsed plasma; RFD, radio
frequency discharge.
Given the complex, poorly understood role that RONS play in natural systems, the effect of
repeated exposure to CAP or PAW for every element of this complex system needs to be better
understood. Long-term effects of food exposure to RONS on the health of human workers and
consumers, microorganisms, plants, and animals also require further exploration.
The scale-up of aquaponics systems to commercial production is currently limited by both high
infrastructure outlay cost and high operating cost. It is worth noting that a recent survey on the
use of aquaponics in Europe found that even the traditional aquaponics systems are at their initial
stage of development, with research (at 75%) and education (41%) being the primary uses for
often custom-made systems [76]. Replacing large biofilters used for ammonia neutralisation,
and cost and labour used for chemical management of infections and water quality with a single
automated plasma system – even a relatively expensive one – will reduce both outlay and
operating costs as well as the physical footprint and complexity of the system. The engineering
challenges of scaled-up systems may differ substantially from that for the systems already in
use for small-scale PAW production.
It is not clear whether solar or other forms of renewable energy will be able to support a larger-scale
plasma system. In addition to solar-powered plasma devices that have already been demonstrated
on a laboratory scale, biomass-derived energy may be another promising alternative due to the abun-
dance of organic waste in many agricultural systems. These types of energy sources can substantially
reduce the cost and increase environmental and economic credentials of industrial CAP, with PAW
used as a vehicle to deliver desired chemistry when solar energy may not be available.
The complexity of control mechanisms required to tailor the chemistry of plasma species (e.g., the
need for specific gases and gas control units) and of instruments or assays currently used to
confirm CAP and PAW chemistry will need to be addressed. The processing of data from
these assays and the identification of specific operating parameters needed for the plasma
system to produce the necessary combination of chemical and physical effects will need to be
conducted using AI.
Declaration of interests
No interests are declared.
References
1. Singh, R. et al. (2019). Human overpopulation and food security: genetic and haematologic biomarkers in the freshwater fish, Clarias
challenges for the agriculture sustainability. In Urban Agriculture gariepinus. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 212, 111982
and Food Systems: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice 21. Fane, A.G. et al. (2005) Membrane Technologies for Meat
(Information Resources Management Association, Ed.), Processing Waste Streams (PRENV.028). Meat & Livestock
pp. 439–467, IGI Global Australia, North Sydney, NSW 2059, April 2005
2. Radwan, T.M. et al. (2019) Dramatic loss of agricultural land due 22. Stouvenakers, G. et al. (2019) Plant pathogens and control strat-
to urban expansion threatens food security in the Nile Delta, egies in aquaponics. In Aquaponics Food Production Systems,
Egypt. Remote Sens. 11, 332 pp. 353–378, Springer
3. Finke, C.E. et al. (2021) Economically advantageous pathways 23. Yildiz, H.Y. et al. (2019) Insight into risks in aquatic animal health
for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from industrial hydrogen in aquaponics. In Aquaponics Food Production Systems: Combined
under common, current economic conditions. Energy Environ. Aquaculture and Hydroponic Production Technologies for the Future
Sci. 14, 1517–1529 (Goddek, S. et al., eds), pp. 435–452, Springer
4. Bazaka, K. et al. (2016) Sustainable life cycles of natural- 24. Assefa, A. and Abunna, F. (2018) Maintenance of fish health in
precursor-derived nanocarbons. Chem. Rev. 116, 163–214 aquaculture: review of epidemiological approaches for preven-
5. Terlouw, T. et al. (2021) Life cycle assessment of carbon dioxide tion and control of infectious disease of fish. J. Vet. Med. Int.
removal technologies: a critical review. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 2018, 5432497
1701–1721 25. Lushchak, V.I. and Lushchak, O. (2021) Interplay between reac-
6. Eyhorn, F. et al. (2019) Sustainability in global agriculture driven tive oxygen and nitrogen species in living organisms. Chem. Biol.
by organic farming. Nat. Sust. 2, 253–255 Interact. 349, 109680
7. Mondal, S. and Palit, D. (2021) Agroecology for sustainable food 26. Zambon, Y. et al. (2020) Plasma activated water triggers plant
system and footprint mitigation. In Agroecological Footprints defence responses. Sci. Rep. 10, 19211
Management for Sustainable Food System (Banerjee, A. et al., 27. Adhikari, B. et al. (2019) Cold atmospheric plasma-activated
eds), pp. 69–114, Springer water irrigation induces defense hormone and gene expression
8. Asadullah, M. et al. (2020) Sustainability and development of in tomato seedlings. Sci. Rep. 9, 16080
aquaponics system: a review. Earth Sci. Pak. (ESP) 4, 78–80 28. Perez, S.M. et al. (2019) Plasma activated water as resistance inducer
9. Dos Santos, M.J.P.L. (2016) Smart cities and urban areas – against bacterial leaf spot of tomato. PLoS ONE 14, e0217788
aquaponics as innovative urban agriculture. Urban For. Urban 29. Brun, P. et al. (2018) Antibacterial efficacy and mechanisms of
Green. 20, 402–406 action of low power atmospheric pressure cold plasma: membrane
10. Junge, R. et al. (2017) Strategic points in aquaponics. Water 9, 182 permeability, biofilm penetration and antimicrobial sensitization.
11. Goddek, S. et al. (2015) Challenges of sustainable and commercial J. Appl. Microbiol. 125, 398–408
aquaponics. Sustainability 7, 4199–4224 30. Olatunde, O.O. et al. (2019) High voltage cold atmospheric
12. Turnsek, M. et al. (2020) Challenges of commercial aquaponics plasma: antibacterial properties and its effect on quality of Asian
in Europe: beyond the hype. Water 12, 306 sea bass slices. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 52, 305–312
13. Nguyen, D.V. et al. (2019) Treatment of surface water using cold 31. Bourke, P. et al. (2017) Microbiological interactions with cold
plasma for domestic water supply. Environ. Eng. Res. 24, plasma. J. Appl. Microbiol. 123, 308–324
412–417 32. López, M. et al. (2019) A review on non-thermal atmospheric
14. Zeghioud, H. et al. (2020) Review on discharge plasma for water plasma for food preservation: mode of action, determinants of
treatment: mechanism, reactor geometries, active species and effectiveness, and applications. Front. Microbiol. 10, 622
combined processes. J. Water Proc. Eng. 38, 101664 33. Gaur, N. et al. (2020) On cold atmospheric-pressure plasma jet
15. Warnecke, M. et al. (2008) Review of Abattoir Water Usage induced DNA damage in cells. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 54, 035203
Reduction, Recycling and Reuse (A.PIA.0086). Meat & Livestock 34. Patange, A. et al. (2019) The effect of atmospheric cold plasma
Australia Limited, North Sydney NSW 2059, June 2008 on bacterial stress responses and virulence using Listeria
16. UniQuest Pty Limited (2003) A Nitrogen Management Strategy monocytogenes knockout mutants. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2841
for Meat Processing Plants (PRENV.012), Meat & Livestock 35. Arjunan, K.P. et al. (2015) Effects of atmospheric pressure
Australia Ltd. plasmas on isolated and cellular DNA – a review. Int. J. Mol.
17. Das, A. et al. (2021) Livelihood security of small holder farmers in Sci. 16, 2971–3016
eastern Himalayas, India: pond based integrated farming system 36. Sohbatzadeh, F. et al. (2016) Inactivation of Aspergillus flavus
a sustainable approach. Curr. Res. Environ. Sust. 3, 100076 spores in a sealed package by cold plasma streamers. J. Theor.
18. Evans, R.A. et al. (2005) Performance of a pilot-scale high rate Appl. Phys. 10, 99–106
algal pond system treating abattoir wastewater in rural South 37. Siddique, S.S. et al. (2021) Plasma-activated water inhibits
Australia: nitrification and denitrification. Water Sci. Technol. 51, in vitro conidial germination of Colletotrichum alienum, a posthar-
117–124 vest pathogen of avocado. Plant Pathol. 70, 367–376
19. South Australian Research and Development Institute (2006) 38. Zhou, R. et al. (2019) Microplasma bubbles: reactive vehicles
Feasibility Study on using Integrated Aquaculture to Treat Waste- for biofilm dispersal. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11,
water from the Meat Processing Industry (PRENV.042), Meat 20660–20669
and Livestock Australia Ltd. 39. Guo, L. et al. (2018) Mechanism of virus inactivation by cold
20. Oyeniran, D.O. et al. (2021) Antibiotics, algal evaluations and atmospheric-pressure plasma and plasma-activated water.
subacute effects of abattoir wastewater on liver function enzymes, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 84, e00726-18
40. Filipić, A. et al. (2020) Cold plasma, a new hope in the field of chemical and sensory evaluation. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 75,
virus inactivation. Trends Biotechnol. 38, 11 323–328
41. Yildiz, H.Y. et al. (2017) Fish welfare in aquaponic systems: its 67. Ma, R. et al. (2015) Non-thermal plasma-activated water inactiva-
relation to water quality with an emphasis on feed and faeces – tion of food-borne pathogen on fresh produce. J. Hazard. Mater.
a review. Water 9, 13 300, 643–651
42. Lennard, W. and Goddek, S. (2019) Aquaponics: the basics. In 68. Surowsky, B. et al. (2013) Cold plasma effects on enzyme activity
Aquaponics Food Production Systems (Goddek, S. et al., eds), in a model food system. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 19,
pp. 113–143, Springer 146–152
43. Goddek, S. et al. (2019) Aquaponics and global food challenges. 69. Liao, X. et al. (2018) Application of atmospheric cold plasma-
In Aquaponics Food Production Systems (Goddek, S. et al., activated water (PAW) ice for preservation of shrimps
eds), pp. 3–17, Springer (Metapenaeus ensis). Food Control 94, 307–314
44. Yep, B. and Zheng, Y. (2019) Aquaponic trends and challenges – 70. Munekata, P.E.S. et al. (2020) Influence of plasma treatment on
a review. J. Clean. Prod. 228, 1586–1599 the polyphenols of food products – a review. Foods 9, 929
45. Murugesan, P. et al. (2020) Water decontamination using non- 71. Pankaj, S.K. et al. (2018) Effects of cold plasma on food quality: a
thermal plasma: concepts, applications, and prospects. J. Environ. review. Foods 7, 4
Chem. Eng. 8, 104377 72. Gavahian, M. et al. (2021) Cold plasma for mitigating agrochem-
46. Abuzairi, T. et al. (2018) Investigation on physicochemical prop- ical and pesticide residue in food and water: similarities with
erties of plasma-activated water for the application of medical ozone and ultraviolet technologies. Food Res. Int. 141, 110138
device sterilization. AIP Conf. Proc. 1933, 040017 73. Schnabel, U. et al. (2021) The effect of plasma treated water unit
47. Šimečková, J. et al. (2020) Influence of plasma-activated water processes on the food quality characteristics of fresh-cut endive.
on physical and physical–chemical soil properties. Water 12, Front. Nutr. 7, 627483
2357 74. Ji-Lun, H. et al. (2019) Novel breeding approach for Japanese
48. Kinandana, A.W. et al. (2018) Analysis of pH on plasma activated flounder using atmosphere and room temperature plasma muta-
medium in aqueous solution in cold atmospheric pressure genesis tool. BMC Genomics 20, 323
plasma jets. Int. J. Innov. Res. Adv. Eng. 5, 22–25 75. Gandhirajan, R.K. et al. (2021) Zebrafish larvae as a toxicity model
49. Vlad, I.-E. and Anghel, S.D. (2017) Time stability of water acti- in plasma medicine. Plasma Process. Polym. 18, e2000188
vated by different on-liquid atmospheric pressure plasmas. 76. Villarroel, M. et al. (2016) Survey of aquaponics in Europe. Water
J. Electrost. 87, 284–292 8, 468
50. Tsoukou, E. et al. (2020) Temperature stability and effectiveness of 77. Al-Abri, M. et al. (2019) Chlorination disadvantages and alterna-
plasma-activated liquids over an 18 months period. Water 12, 3021 tive routes for biofouling control in reverse osmosis desalination.
51. Kinandana, A.W. et al. (2018) Analysis of plasma-activated NPJ Clean Water 2, 1–16
medium (PAM) in aqueous solution by an atmospheric pressure 78. Nam, M.-K. et al. (2017) Harmless effects of argon plasma on cau-
plasma jet (APPJ), MATEC Web of Conferences 197. EDP Sciences, dal fin regeneration and embryogenesis of zebrafish: novel biological
p. 02013 approaches for safe medical applications of bioplasma. Exp. Mol.
52. Fang, S. et al. (2020) Study on pyrolysis products characteristics Med. 49, e355
of medical waste and fractional condensation of the pyrolysis oil. 79. de Souza Silva, D.A. et al. (2019) Use of cold atmospheric
Energy 195, 116969 plasma to preserve the quality of white shrimp (Litopenaeus
53. Cai, X. and Du, C. (2021) Thermal plasma treatment of medical vannamei). J. Food Protect. 82, 1217–1223
waste. Plasma Chem. Plasma Proc. 41, 1–46 80. Varilla, C. et al. (2020) Potential of cold plasma technology in en-
54. Tijani, J.O. et al. (2014) A review of combined advanced oxidation suring the safety of foods and agricultural produce: a review.
technologies for the removal of organic pollutants from water. Foods 9, 1435
Water Air Soil Pollut. 225, 1–30 81. Lacombe, A. et al. (2015) Atmospheric cold plasma inactivation
55. Sakudo, A. et al. (2019) Disinfection and sterilization using of aerobic microorganisms on blueberries and effects on quality
plasma technology: fundamentals and future perspectives for attributes. Food Microbiol. 46, 479–484
biological applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 5216 82. Ziuzina, D. et al. (2016) Demonstrating the potential of industrial
56. Slamani, S. et al. (2018) Initiation of Fenton process by plasma scale in-package atmospheric cold plasma for decontamination
gliding arc discharge for the degradation of paracetamol in of cherry tomatoes. Plasma Med. 6, 397–412
water. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 359, 1–10 83. Min, S.C. et al. (2017) In-package inhibition of E. coli O157: H7
57. Zahoranová, A. et al. (2016) Effect of cold atmospheric pressure on bulk romaine lettuce using cold plasma. Food Microbiol. 65,
plasma on the wheat seedlings vigor and on the inactivation of 1–6
microorganisms on the seeds surface. Plasma Chem. Plasma 84. Misra, N. (2014) In-package atmospheric pressure cold plasma
Proc. 36, 397–414 treatment of strawberries. J. Food Eng. 125, 131–138
58. Nishime, T.M.C. et al. (2020) A coaxial dielectric barrier dis- 85. Ji, S.H. et al. (2018) Characterization of physical and biochemical
charge reactor for treatment of winter wheat seeds. Appl. changes in plasma treated spinach seed during germination.
Sci. 10, 7133 J. Phys. D Appl.Phys. 51, 145205
59. Mai-Prochnow, A. et al. (2021) Interactions of plasma-activated 86. Jiang, J. et al. (2014) Effect of seed treatment by cold plasma on
water with biofilms: inactivation, dispersal effects and mecha- the resistance of tomato to Ralstonia solanacearum (bacterial
nisms of action. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 7, 1–12 wilt). PLoS ONE 9, e97753
60. Ohta, T. (2016) Plasma in agriculture. In Cold Plasma in Food and 87. Mohamed, E.E. et al. (2021) Impact of atmospheric cold plasma
Agriculture (Misra, N.N. et al., eds), pp. 205–221, Academic Press (ACP) on maintaining bolti fish (Tilapia nilotica) freshness and
61. Adhikari, B. et al. (2020) The effects of plasma on plant growth, quality criteria during cold storing. J. Food Proc. Preserv. 45,
development, and sustainability. Appl. Sci. 10, 6045 e15442
62. Attri, P. et al. (2021) Impact of atmospheric pressure plasma 88. Baranov, O. et al. (2018) From nanometre to millimetre: a range
treated seeds on germination, morphology, gene expression of capabilities for plasma-enabled surface functionalization and
and biochemical responses. Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 60, 040502 nanostructuring. Mater. Horiz. 5, 765–798
63. Kumar, S.P.J. et al. (2021) Implications of reactive oxygen and 89. Tamilselvi, R. et al. (2022) NiFe2O4/rGO nanocomposites pro-
nitrogen species in seed physiology for sustainable crop productivity duced by soft bubble assembly for energy storage and environ-
under changing climate conditions. Curr. Plant Biol. 26, 100197 mental remediation. Renew. Energy 181, 1386–1401
64. Thirumdas, R. et al. (2018) Plasma activated water (PAW): 90. Levchenko, I. et al. (2018) Lightning under water: diverse
chemistry, physico-chemical properties, applications in food reactive environments and evidence of synergistic effects
and agriculture. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 77, 21–31 for material treatment and activation. Appl. Phys. Rev. 5,
65. Tsukagoshi, H. (2016) Control of root growth and development 021103
by reactive oxygen species. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 29, 57–63 91. Adamovich, I. et al. (2017) The 2017 plasma roadmap: low tem-
66. Choi, S. et al. (2017) Effect of corona discharge plasma on micro- perature plasma science and technology. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys.
bial decontamination of dried squid shreds including physico- 50, 323001
92. Levchenko, I. et al. (2022) Functional nanomaterials from waste and 94. Piferi, C. et al. (2021) Hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity control of
low-value natural products: A technological approach level. Adv. plasma-treated surfaces via fractal parameters. Adv. Mater.
Mater. Technol. Published online June 28, 2022. https://doi.org/ Interfaces 8, 2100724
10.1002/admt.202101471 95. Luo, H. et al. (2017) Mutually synergistic nanoparticles for effective
93. Kumar, A. et al. (2021) Functional nanomaterials, synergism and thermo-molecularly targeted therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1702834
biomimicry for environmentally benign marine antifouling technology. 96. Keidar, M. et al. (2018) Plasmas for treating cancer: opportunities for
Mater. Horiz. 8, 3201–3238 adaptive and self-adaptive approaches. Trends Biotech 36, 586–593