Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AJA
AJA
AJA
Corporate Social
Responsibility and their buying behavior towards a Strategic Corporate
Social Responsibility in Lipa City
Chapter I
THE PROBLEM
Introduction
In an increasingly interconnected world, the concept of Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR) has gained prominence as stakeholders demand greater
accountability and ethical practices from corporations. Companies are expected
to go beyond their core business activities and take responsibility for their impact
on society and the environment. One such company that has embraced CSR as
a key component of its business strategy is Jollibee Food Corporation, a leading
fast-food chain in the Philippines with a global presence.
This study aims to address this research gap by examining the level of
awareness among consumers in Lipa City regarding Jollibee Food Corporation's
CSR initiatives and how this awareness impacts their buying behavior. By
focusing on a strategic CSR framework that links Jollibee's CSR activities to
consumer behavior, this research seeks to provide insights into the role of CSR
in shaping consumer preferences and choices at the local level.
insights can be gained on how companies can leverage their CSR efforts to
improve brand reputation, enhance customer loyalty, and drive sustainable
business growth in the long run.
Overall, the study is significant as it sheds light on the evolving dynamics
between CSR and consumer behavior in a specific locality like Lipa City,
providing practical implications for companies, policymakers, and other
stakeholders in promoting responsible business practices that benefit both
society and the environment.
Statement of the Problem
This study aimed to identify the relationship of consumer’s awareness of
Jollibee Foods Corporation’s (JFC) Corporate Social Responsibility Programs
and their buying behavior of their consumers in Lipa City.
1. What is the demographic profile of consumers in terms of:
1.1. Age
1.2. Gender
1.3. Educational Attainment
1.4. Employment status
2. How do consumers be assessed with the Jollibee Food Corp. CSR program
with regard to:
2.1. Education
2.2. Environment
2.3. Housing and Community Development; and
2.4. Other CSR Program
3. Do the awareness of consumers significantly affects the buying behavior of
consumers in Jollibee Food Corp.
4. What plan of action will be proposed to solve the problem
5. Based on the study what would be the cause of action and assessing the
level of Awareness on Jollibee Food Corp. CSR programs and their buying
behavior towards a strategic corporate social responsibility
Theoretical Framework
Figure 1 shows the study where the first box shows the socio-demographic
profile of the respondents, the second box contains CSR Awareness and
Effectiveness, which will both relate independently to consumer buying behavior.
The socio-demographic profile of the respondents was determined, particularly
age, gender, educational attainment, and employment status. The information
gathered was processed and related to the consumer buying behavior.
The JFC CSR Programs are treated as motivating mechanisms in this research.
At this point, the implementation of these CSR programs was being used by
consumers to present and support the Attribution Theory of Weiner. The
consumers were assessed through JFC’s CSR programs, which may or may not
cause a change in their buying behavior.
These CSR programs are clustered into four themes pre-determined by Jollibee
Foods Corporation namely, Education, Environment, Housing and Community
4
Development, and Other CSR programs. These themes have three programs
under them, which Jollibee has been doing over the past five years.
The meaningful contract between the businesses and the society is getting more
significant. The organizations were more concerned with the society they belong.
While realizing that aside from doing their normal operations, the organization
has a shared responsibility to the community. By the nature of operating on a
certain locality, businesses exhaust resources to conduct their operations,
through the social contract, businesses give back to the company, through CSR
efforts or improvement of operation’s systems and procedures.
Conceptual Framework
This section contains your own framework or design for your own study.
You need to present your conceptual paradigm and discuss the contents of such
figure/model. The figure and discussion should contain the variables (profile and
test variables) you included in the statement of the problem and your own
assumptions regarding the relationships of such variables.
Hypothesis of the Study
The study tested the hypothesis given below:
Ho: There is no significant difference on … when grouped according to … .
(or if there are two or more hypotheses)
The study tested the following hypotheses:
Ho1: There is no significant difference on … when grouped according to … .
Ho2: There is no significant relationship between … .
Ho3: The … has no significant effect on … .
5
(The order of the hypotheses should be in the same order as the corresponding
research question in the statement of the problem.)
Scope and Limitations of the Study
In this section, you need to include the discussion on the following: what is
the study all about, what are the objectives of the study and what are the
variables used; why is there a need to conduct the study; who were your
respondents; when and where was the study conducted; how did you conduct
the study; and what are the perceived limitations or weaknesses of the study (the
unavoidable cases or circumstances that made the study or the results of the
study “weaker”).
Significance of the Study
Introductory statement … .
To first beneficiary (state the first and foremost beneficiary, in bold
letters), this study will … ;
To second beneficiary, this study will … ;
To third beneficiary, this study will … ;
…
… ; and
To future researchers, this study will … .
Definition of Terms
Introductory statement … .
First Term. (bold letters, capitalize first letter of major words in the term,
with period after the term) State the conceptual definition, one sentence only,
then at the end of sentence, before the period, indicate the reference (book,
journal article and other reliable source; do not use thesis, dictionary and
unreliable web article as reference), in APA style author-year format (Author,
year). State a one-sentence operational definition, usually starting with “In this
study,”.
Second Term. Conceptual definition (Author, year). In this study, … .
Third Term. Conceptual definition (Author, year). In this study, … .
…
…
Last Term. Conceptual definition (Author, year). In this study, … .
Note: The terms should be arranged alphabetically. Only important terms should
be defined here, usually, but not limited to, the terms included in the title and in
the main research question or statement of the problem.
6
Chapter II
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
This chapter deals with the review of related concepts and studies found
in previous literature. It also presents a synthesis of reviewed research literature.
(Or any similar introduction of the chapter)
Conceptual Literature
Provide an introductory statement for this section. Then present a review
of conceptual literature related to your present study in topical approach and in
an order starting with the general topic then the specific topics, particularly the
variables used (test variables) in the same order as in the statement of the
problem. Provide at least five literature reviews for each topic and use more
recent literature (i.e., not older than 10 years). Old literature or references may
still be allowed for conceptual literature depending on the level of its importance
or significance to the present study or if no recent literature is available.
Conceptual literature include books, other reliable general references,
government laws and issuances, and articles published in research journals
(provided that in case of articles only concepts and theories should be included in
the review of conceptual literature and the empirical findings or results of study
are to be included in the review of research literature). For conceptual literature
review, it is not necessary that one paragraph has only one reference.
General Topic
Present here the review of concepts and theories related to your general
topic. Do not just copy the literature. You need to rephrase or paraphrase the
literature you read but still properly cite the reference using APA Style 6th edition.
Variable One (the order is according to Statement of the Problem)
Present here the review of concepts and theories related to your first
variable.
Variable Two
Present here the review of concepts and theories related to your second
variable.
Until the Last Variable
Present here the review of concepts and theories related to your last
variable.
Research Literature
Present here the review of related studies or researches at one-study-one-
paragraph approach (except in few cases where more than one paragraph per
study may be allowed, provided that citation is clearly stated per paragraph). The
presentation should be from the most-related down to the least-related study.
Research literature include theses, dissertations, case studies, feasibility studies,
capstone projects and the like from local and foreign higher education
institutions, and research articles published in refereed journals, whether in print
or electronic (provided that, in case of published articles, the methodology and
empirical findings or results of study, and not merely the concepts or theories,
shall be presented here). At least 10 related researches should be reviewed and
presented here. Do not include degree-requirement researches (theses,
8
dissertations and the like) that are older than 10 years. Published articles in
refereed journals older than 10 years are still acceptable depending upon its
importance or significance to the present study but student-researchers are
highly encouraged to look for and use more recent articles.
Each review of related research shall include the following (whenever
available in the research reviewed and useful for the present study): main topic
and objectives of the study with the variables used, research design and data
gathering instrument used, sampling design and respondents of the study, and
salient findings or results of the study. The title of thesis or research article
should not be mentioned as is but the topic of the research reviewed has to be
clearly stated. For example, instead of stating: The study of Castillo (2014)
entitled “Employability Skills of Graduating Business and Accounting Students of
Batangas State University” …; you may write: Castillo (2014) assessed the
employability skills of graduating business and accounting students of Batangas
State University … (or any similar sentence not mentioning the title as is).
Synthesis
Present a synthesis of reviewed researches, that is, combining two or
more generally related studies in one paragraph and discuss their similarities and
differences to your present study. The synthesis should include all the
researches reviewed and usually presented in not more than two pages, usually
2 to 4 paragraphs. In mentioning the references, the author-year format (APA
Style 6th edition) should still be used.
Be reminded further that the author may not necessarily be a person or
persons; it may also be an organization or an institution. Regarding citation of
references with multiple authors, similar authors, similar surnames of authors, no
author, no date or year, same authors with the same year, online references, and
other queries on citation and referencing, refer to the rules on APA Style 6 th
edition.
Chapter III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This chapter deals with the research methods used in the study. It
includes discussion on research design, respondents of the study including
sampling, data gathering instrument, data gathering procedure, and statistical
treatment of data.
(Or any similar introduction of the chapter)
Research Design
State here the research design used and provide a brief discussion
regarding such design. You may include a definition or description of the
research design from a reliable reference, usually a book on research methods
(do not use previous thesis as reference for this), and properly cite the reference
using APA Style.
This section usually consists of only two or three paragraphs. On the last
part, state a justification for the use of such design or why the design is the most
appropriate for your present study.
Respondents of the Study
Mention who are the respondents, describe their characteristics and
explain why they are the suitable respondents for your study. Include the number
of respondents and explain how you arrived at such number or how you
determined the sample size.
State the sampling design used and discuss how this was actually utilized
or conducted (there is no need to define and explain the sampling design as
found in books). If all members of the population are your respondents (or target
respondents), clearly state and explain why it was necessary to conduct a
census on the whole population instead of sampling.
Sampling
Indicate which sampling technique will be employed by the researchers.
Give a brief overview of the sampling technique and then state the reason why is
the mentioned sampling was used by the researcher.
Data Gathering Instrument
State the data gathering instrument used. If the data gathering instrument
is a survey questionnaire made or constructed by you as researcher, you need to
present here the following: how the questionnaire was constructed, the content of
the questionnaire, who validated it and how it was validated, the conduct of dry
run – when, where and who were the respondents for the dry run, the reliability
analysis and its result, how it should be administered including the ethical
considerations on its administration, and the scoring to be used for the
questionnaire.
For scoring and interpretation, the following is sample:
The scoring and interpretation used for the questionnaire is presented in
Table 1.
Table 1
Scoring and Interpretation
Response Scale Mean Score Interpretation
10
It can be deduced from Table 3 that … (present the major contents of the
table, analyze and interpret in your own words, and discuss relevant conceptual
or research literature in relation to your findings).
2. Subtitle Two (e.g. Assessment on … short title from Statement of the
Problem No. 2, single space if subtitle will consume two lines)
13
applicable)
and so on
and so on Category 1
Category 2
and so on
Overall (if Category 1
necessary/ Category 2
applicable)
and so on
Table 9
Differences on _____ When Grouped according to Profile Variable Name
Profile Chi-
Mean p- Decision Interpretatio
Variable Variable square
Rank value on Ho n
Name value
Test Category 1
Variable 1 Category 2
and so on
Test Category 1
Variable 2 Category 2
and so on
and so on Category 1
Category 2
and so on
Overall (if Category 1
necessary/ Category 2
applicable)
and so on
Further Notes:
“Cut” table (i.e. a single table in two pages) should be avoided. You may
cut discussions but not the table, except when the table does not fit in one page,
16
and in such a case, Table Number with the word “Continued” enclosed in
parenthesis and column headings should be repeated in the succeeding pages.
If the contents of the table are not results of your study and from another
source, indicate the source below the table.
If you use abbreviation in the table, indicate the meaning of such
abbreviation below the table.
If testing significant differences is not applicable to your study and instead
there is just a need to compare the mean responses of different groups of
respondents, then your results may be presented as follows:
4. Subtitle Four (e.g. Comparison of … )
Table 10 shows the comparison of responses of the different groups of
respondents based on _____ (profile/grouping variable).
Table 10
Comparison of Responses of Different Groups based on Profile Variable
Name
Profile/Grouping Variable Name
Variable Category 1 Category 2 and so on
Mean Interpretation Mean Interpretation Mean Interpretation
Test
Variable 1
Test
Variable 2
and so on
Overall (if
necessary/
applicable)
Table 12
Relationship between _____ and _____
Name of Variable 2
Variable Pearson’s r p-value Decision on Interpretatio
Ho n
Sub-variable 1
Sub-variable 2
and so on…
Name of
Variable 1
Table 14
Relationship between _____ and _____
Name of Variable 2
Variable Chi-square p-value Decision on Interpretatio
value Ho n
Sub-variable 1
Sub-variable 2
and so on…
Name of
Variable 1
Variable 3
Variable 3 Variable 4
r p Dec. Int. r p Dec. Int.
Variable 1
Variable 2
If the study also needs to test the effect, impact, influence and the like, the
following is a sample presentation:
6. Subtitle Six (e.g. Effect of ____ on ____ … )
Table 17 shows the results of bivariate regression analysis on the effect of
____ on ____.
Table 17
Effect of _____ on _____
Table 19 (Continued)
majority (if more than 50%) or most (if the highest but less than 50%) of the
respondents. For conclusion on mean assessment: state the interpretation of the
composite means of each variable. For conclusion on significant difference,
relationship or effect: state a summary of significant difference, relationship or
effect and the non-significant difference, relationship or effect. For conclusion on
comparison of responses: state a summary of different and of similar responses.
For conclusion on output: state the importance or substance of the proposed
output.
Recommendations
Recommendations should be based on findings and conclusions.
Recommendations are appeals to concerned individuals, institutions or
organizations to solve or help solve the problems discovered in the study, to
enhance or improve a procedure or system, to continue or sustain a good
practice or system, and the like. However, no recommendation that is not directly
related to the study should be made. Recommendations should also be practical
and attainable; it is useless to recommend the impossible.
Recommendations are suggestions and not requirements; thus, words
that are compelling or obliging should not be used. These are also listed by
number and each is stated in only one sentence. A recommendation for further or
future related study should also be included and placed in the last number.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
A. Books
B. Journals
D. Electronic References
Name of Organization as Author. (year). Title of Web Article. Retrieved from URL
E. Other References
Name of Agency. (year). Memorandum Order or Issuance No. ___, Title of Order
or Issuance.
The references should be alphabetized separately for each section. Authors may
not only be particular persons but may also be organizations.
Please see APA Style 6th edition for detailed instructions on listing the references
and some samples.