Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 3
Chapter 3
Chapter 3
www.AroraIAS.com
➢ Considered the "Magna Carta" of the Company.
➢ Key Points:
✓ Bengal: Duty-free trade (except annual fee), right to issue movement passes, rent more land.
✓ Hyderabad: Existing duty-free trade continued.
✓ Surat: Duty-free trade for annual fee.
✓ Company coins minted in Bombay became legal tender throughout Mughal Empire.
Establishment of Dominance:
➢ English used diplomacy to gain concessions, but later defeated French for complete control.
Merger of Rival Companies:
➢ Whigs opposed East India Company's monopoly after the English Revolution (1688).
➢ A rival company emerged but failed.
➢ Both companies merged in 1708 as the "United Company of Merchants of England Trading to the East
Indies."
➢ This company (1708-1873) laid the foundation for British political power in India.
East India Company: Formative Years (1600-1717)
• 1600: Founded in England.
• 1609-1613: Mughal permission secured for trade in Surat (factory established in 1613).
• 1615-1618: Sir Thomas Roe's embassy secures farmans for free trade with reduced tolls.
• 1616: First factory in South India established at Masulipatnam.
• 1632: "Golden Farman" from Golconda Sultan grants trading privileges.
• 1633: First factory in East India established at Hariharpur (Odisha).
• 1639: Madras leased from a local king.
• 1651: Permission to trade in Hooghly (Bengal) granted.
• 1662: Bombay acquired by British Crown as dowry.
• 1667: Mughal farman allows English trade in Bengal.
• 1691: Imperial order permits continued trade in Bengal for annual fee.
• 1717: Farrukhsiyar's farman ("Magna Carta") grants extensive trade concessions.
Anglo-French Rivalry
Background of Anglo-French Rivalry:
➢ Both nations aimed for political power in India, stemming from their European rivalry.
➢ Carnatic Wars emerged as a decisive conflict determining Indian supremacy.
First Carnatic War (1740-1748):
➢ Triggered by European Anglo-French War due to Austrian War of Succession.
➢ English navy provoked France by seizing French ships, leading to French capture of Madras in 1746.
➢ War ended with Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle in 1748, returning Madras to English and French territories in
North America.
Immediate Cause:
➢ English navy under Barnet seized French ships, leading to French retaliation.
➢ France captured Madras in 1746 with help from Admiral La Bourdonnais from Mauritius.
Result and Significance:
➢ Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle concluded the war, restoring Madras to English and French territories in North
America.
➢ Battle of St. Thome highlighted the effectiveness of disciplined small European armies against larger
Indian forces.
➢ Naval strength became crucial in Anglo-French conflict in the Deccan region.
Political Context:
➢ Uncertain political situation in South India with declining power of Nizam Asaf Jah of Hyderabad and
fragmented smaller states.
www.AroraIAS.com
➢ Maratha kingdom of Tanjore posed interference threat in the region.
First Carnatic War (1740-1748):
• Caused by: Austrian War of Succession in Europe.
• Trigger: British naval attack on French ships.
• French captured Madras (1746) with Indian support.
• Ended: Treaty of Aix-La Chapelle (1748) - Madras returned to British.
• Significance:
• Highlighted European military superiority over Indian forces (Battle of St. Thome).
• Importance of naval power in the conflict.
Second Carnatic War (1749-1754)
Background:
➢ Dupleix aimed to increase French power in southern India by meddling in local disputes.
➢ Death of Nizam-ul-Mulk and release of Chanda Sahib by Marathas led to power struggle.
Immediate Cause:
➢ Dispute over Hyderabad throne between Nasir Jang and Muzaffar Jang.
➢ Appointment of Anwar-ud-din Khan as Nawab opposed by Chanda Sahib.
➢ French supported Muzaffar Jang and Chanda Sahib, English sided with Nasir Jang and Anwar-ud-din.
Course of the War:
➢ Combined forces of Muzaffar Jang, Chanda Sahib, and French defeated Anwar ud-din at Battle of
Ambur in 1749.
➢ Muzaffar Jang became subahdar of Deccan, Dupleix appointed governor of Mughal territories.
➢ French army under Bussy secured French interests at Hyderabad.
➢ Territories near Pondicherry and some areas on Orissa Coast ceded to the French.
Robert Clive's Strategy:
➢ Proposed attack on Arcot to relieve pressure on Trichinopoly.
➢ Successfully captured Arcot with 210 men in August 1751.
➢ Chanda Sahib's siege on Arcot lasted 53 days, ultimately failing.
➢ Mysore, Tanjore, and Maratha chief Morari Rao aided Clive and Stringer Lawrence.
Result:
➢ French recalled Dupleix in 1754 due to heavy financial losses.
➢ Godeheu succeeded Dupleix, adopted negotiation policy with English.
➢ Treaty concluded, parties agreed not to interfere in native princes' quarrels.
Implications:
➢ European success no longer dependent on Indian authority.
➢ Muhammad Ali and Salabat Jang became clients rather than patrons of European powers.
Third Carnatic War (1758-1763)
Background:
➢ Started as part of the Seven Years War (1756-1763) in Europe.
➢ Britain and France were on opposing sides once again.
Course of War in India:
➢ French under Count de Lally captured English forts at St. David and Vizianagaram in 1758.
➢ English retaliated, defeating French fleet under Admiral D’Ache at Masulipatnam.
Battle of Wandiwash:
➢ Decisive battle on January 22, 1760, in Tamil Nadu.
➢ General Eyre Coote led English forces to victory, routing French army under Count Thomas Arthur de
Lally.
➢ Pondicherry defended gallantly by Lally before surrendering in January 1761.
www.AroraIAS.com
Result and Significance:
➢ Third Carnatic War proved decisive, marking the end of French political influence in India.
➢ Treaty of Peace of Paris (1763) restored French factories in India but diminished their power.
➢ English emerged as supreme European power in the Indian subcontinent.
➢ Battle of Plassey (1757) often seen as crucial, but Wandiwash also significant in solidifying British rule.
➢ Victory at Wandiwash left English East India Company without European rivals, paving the way for their
dominance.
Native Involvement:
➢ Sepoys served in both armies during the Battle of Wandiwash, highlighting native involvement in
European conflicts.
➢ Lack of geopolitical awareness among native rulers contributed to inevitability of European invasion
and rule in India.
Rise and Fall of Dupleix in India
Joseph Francois Dupleix (1697-1763)
Early Career:
➢ Son of a wealthy French official.
➢ Gained high position in Pondicherry (1720), allegedly due to influence.
➢ Engaged in private trade (then permitted).
➢ Suspended in 1726 due to company restructuring, reinstated in 1730.
➢ Appointed Governor-General of French colonies in India (1741).
➢ Awarded titles by Mughal emperor and Subahdar of Deccan.
Dupleix as Administrator:
➢ Became Governor-General of Pondicherry in 1741.
➢ Faced challenges: Maratha invasion, famine, and economic woes.
➢ Reduced public spending (against council's wishes) and balanced budget.
➢ Fortified Pondicherry despite company's cost-cutting orders.
➢ Developed Pondicherry's trade, making it a commercial hub.
Dupleix as Diplomat:
➢ Pioneered European intervention in Indian politics.
➢ Used Nawabs of Carnatic to protect French settlements.
➢ Secured promises of territory from Nawabs in exchange for military support.
➢ Persuaded French Admiral La Bourdonnais to break agreements with English.
➢ Supported specific candidates in Indian succession disputes (Muzaffar Jang, Chanda Sahib).
➢ Considered the originator of the "subsidiary alliance" system in India.
Reasons for Recall:
➢ Recalled in 1754 due to initial French defeats and high financial costs.
➢ Historians debate the recall's justification, suggesting a potential compromise with England.
Weaknesses of Dupleix:
➢ Overly optimistic, sometimes missing critical moments.
➢ Autocratic style caused friction with colleagues.
➢ Focused on planning and leadership, not battlefield command.
➢ French failures (e.g., Trichinopoly) linked to ineffective execution of Dupleix's strategies.
English Success vs. French Failure in India
English Advantages:
➢ Private company: faster decisions, more enthusiasm.
➢ Superior navy: control of sea routes.
➢ More settlements in India (Calcutta, Bombay, Madras).
➢ Balanced focus on trade and territory (secure finances).
➢ Strong leadership (Clive, Coote, Lawrence).
www.AroraIAS.com
French Disadvantages:
➢ State-controlled company: slow decisions, less motivation.
➢ Weaker navy: vulnerable supply lines.
➢ Fewer settlements (Pondicherry only).
➢ Prioritized territory over trade (financial strain).
➢ Limited leadership (Dupleix only).
The Danes in India
Establishment of Danish East India Company:
➢ Founded in 1616.
➢ Established a factory at Tranquebar in 1620.
Principal Settlement: Serampore near Calcutta.
Commercial Significance: Danish factories were not significant in trade.
End of Danish Presence: Danish factories sold to British government in 1845.
Missionary Activities:
➢ Danes known more for missionary work than commerce.
➢ Contributed significantly to Christian missions in India.
Why England Became the Dominant European Power in India
Structure of Trading Companies:
English East India Company:
➢ Board of directors elected annually.
➢ Shareholders influenced decisions.
French and Portuguese companies:
➢ State-controlled, less flexible.
➢ Less shareholder interest.
Naval Superiority:
➢ Strong Royal Navy with advanced technology.
➢ Victories against Spanish Armada and French cemented dominance.
➢ Enabled troop movement and trade protection in India.
Industrial Revolution:
➢ Early industrialization in England (18th century).
➢ Increased production in textiles, metalworking, and agriculture.
➢ Maintained technological advantage over other European nations.
Military Strength:
➢ Disciplined and well-trained British soldiers.
➢ Skilled commanders and innovative tactics.
➢ Technological advancements in weaponry.
Stable Government:
➢ Relatively stable government in Britain compared to other European powers.
➢ France's revolution and Napoleonic Wars weakened their position.
➢ Other nations like Italy and Netherlands faced internal conflicts.
Religious Tolerance:
➢ Less emphasis on spreading Christianity compared to Spain, Portugal, and Dutch.
➢ Made British rule more acceptable to Indian subjects.
Financial Innovation:
➢ Use of debt markets to fund wars and expansion.
➢ Bank of England sold government debt in exchange for funding.
➢ Enabled higher military spending than rivals like France.
www.AroraIAS.com