The Effects of Ai technology on student engagement among SCSHS

Statement of The Problem

This study aims to determine the effects of Ai technology on student engagement among SCSHS
during the year 2023-2024. Specifically, this sought answers to the following questions:

1. What is the profile of the respondents according to:

1.1. Age

1.2. Sex

Table 1. Demographic Profile of Grade 12 Sagay City Senior High School Students

Variable Category Frequency Percentage

16 46 34
17 68 50
Age
18 21 16
Total 161 100
Male 53 39
Sex Female 82 61
Total 135 100
2. What is the level of effect of Ai technology in student engagement in terms of:

2.1 Participation

2.2 Interaction

23. Learning Interest

Table 2. Level of Effect of AI technology in the Student’s Engagement in terms of

Participation, Interaction, and Learning Interest

Engagement M SD Interpretation
Participation 3.61 0.45 Often
Interaction 3.31 0.54 Sometimes
Learning Interest 3.65 0.40 Often
As a whole 3.52 0.34 Often
Note: Means are interpreted as follows: 1 – 1.8 (Never), 1.9 – 2.6 (Rarely), 2.7 – 3.4 (Sometimes), 3.5 –
4.2 (Often), 4.3 – 5.0 (Always)

3. Is there a significant difference between the profile of respondents in the effects of Ai technology in
student engagement?

Table 3. Significant Difference between the profile of respondents and the effects of AI
Technology in student engagement
Mean t-value/f-value p-value Interpretation Decision
Age
16 3.53
17 3.51 0.172 0.842 Not Significant Failed to Reject Ho
18 3.56
Sex
Male 3.55
0.671 0.503 Not Significant Failed to Reject Ho
Female 3.51
Note: Level of Significance at alpha = 0.05

4. Is there a significant difference of the level of the effect of Ai Technology in terms of Participation,
Interaction and Learning Interest.
Table 4. Significant Difference between the profile of respondents and the effects of AI
Technology in student engagement in terms of Participation
Mean t-value/f-value p-value Interpretation Decision
Age
16 3.62
17 3.60 0.036 0.964 Not Significant Failed to Reject Ho
18 3.62
Sex
Male 3.67
1.347 0.180 Not Significant Failed to Reject Ho
Female 3.57
Note: Level of Significance at alpha = 0.05

Table 5. Significant Difference between the profile of respondents and the effects of AI
Technology in student engagement in terms of Interaction
Mean t-value/f-value p-value Interpretation Decision
Age
16 3.32
17 3.28 0.364 0.696 Not Significant Failed to Reject Ho
18 3.40
Sex
Male 3.32
0.082 0.935 Not Significant Failed to Reject Ho
Female 3.31
Note: Level of Significance at alpha = 0.05

Table 6. Significant Difference between the profile of respondents and the effects of AI
Technology in student engagement in terms of Learning Interest
t-value/f-
Mean p-value Interpretation Decision
value
Age
16 3.66
Failed to Reject
17 3.65 0.007 0.993 Not Significant
Ho
18 3.65
Sex
Male 3.65
Failed to Reject
Femal -0.145 0.885 Not Significant
3.66 Ho
e
Note: Level of Significance at alpha = 0.05

SPSS RESULTS
FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=Age Sex
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Frequencies

Notes
Output Created 05-APR-2024 22:12:57
Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet0
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 135
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are
treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics are based on all cases
with valid data.
Syntax FREQUENCIES
VARIABLES=Age Sex
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.02
Elapsed Time 00:00:00.00

Statistics
Age Sex
N Valid 135 135
Missing 0 0

Frequency Table
 Age
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 16 46 34.1 34.1 34.1
17 68 50.4 50.4 84.4
18 21 15.6 15.6 100.0
Total 135 100.0 100.0

Sex
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Male 53 39.3 39.3 39.3
Female 82 60.7 60.7 100.0
Total 135 100.0 100.0

Level of Engagement in terms of Participation, Interaction and Learning

Interest

Descriptives

Notes
Output Created 05-APR-2024 22:16:47
Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet0
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 135
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User defined missing values are
treated as missing.
 Cases Used All non-missing data are used.
Syntax DESCRIPTIVES VARIABLES=P1
P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10
Pwhole I1 I2 I3 I4 I5 I6 I7 I8 I9 I10
Iwhole
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 L9
L10 Lwhole Whole
/STATISTICS=MEAN STDDEV
MIN MAX.
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.00
Elapsed Time 00:00:00.00

Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
Participation 1 135 2.00 5.00 3.9407 .82646
Participation 2 135 2.00 5.00 3.6889 .89331
Participation 3 135 1.00 5.00 3.7185 1.02689
Participation 4 135 1.00 5.00 3.8593 .97860
Participation 5 135 2.00 5.00 3.7111 .96866
Participation 6 135 1.00 5.00 3.7333 .96351
Participation 7 135 1.00 5.00 3.5185 .93722
Participation 8 135 1.00 6.00 3.2667 .89942
Participation 9 135 1.00 5.00 3.4000 .92398
Participation 10 135 1.00 5.00 3.2370 .94795
Participation whole 135 2.20 4.60 3.6074 .44732
Interaction 1 135 1.00 5.00 3.5333 .88773
Interaction 2 135 2.00 5.00 3.4741 .81798
Interaction 3 135 1.00 5.00 3.2741 1.21821
Interaction 4 135 1.00 5.00 3.2519 1.07702
Interaction 5 135 1.00 5.00 3.0444 .98395
Interaction 6 135 1.00 5.00 3.4222 1.06831
Interaction 7 135 1.00 5.00 3.4889 1.04999
Interaction 8 135 1.00 5.00 3.2519 1.01274
Interaction 9 135 1.00 5.00 3.0444 1.04999
Interaction 10 135 1.00 5.00 3.3185 1.06961
Interaction whole 135 1.50 4.80 3.3104 .53633
Learning 1 135 1.00 6.00 3.5333 1.02068
Learning 2 135 2.00 5.00 3.6444 .94999
Learning 3 135 2.00 6.00 3.7630 1.01634
Learning 4 135 1.00 5.00 3.7704 .97690
Learning 5 135 1.00 5.00 3.9185 .97009
Learning 6 135 1.00 8.00 3.6222 .99900
Learning 7 135 2.00 5.00 3.5556 .91966
Learning 8 135 1.00 5.00 3.7185 .91954
Learning 9 135 2.00 5.00 3.6296 1.00551
Learning 10 135 1.00 5.00 3.3778 .93734
Learning whole 135 1.80 4.50 3.6533 .39584
As a whole 135 2.20 4.60 3.5230 .33634
Valid N (listwise) 135

Significant Difference between the Profile of the Respondents and the

Effects of AI Technology to Student’s Engagement

AGE

Oneway

Notes
Output Created 05-APR-2024 22:33:47
Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet0
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 135
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are
treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics for each analysis are
based on cases with no missing
data for any variable in the
analysis.
Syntax ONEWAY Whole BY Age
/STATISTICS DESCRIPTIVES
/MISSING ANALYSIS
/POSTHOC=TUKEY
ALPHA(0.05).
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.00
Elapsed Time 00:00:00.02

Descriptives
As a whole
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Minimum
16 46 3.5283 .36066 .05318 3.4212 3.6354 2.20
17 68 3.5088 .35607 .04318 3.4226 3.5950 2.60
18 21 3.5571 .19640 .04286 3.4677 3.6465 3.20
Total 135 3.5230 .33634 .02895 3.4657 3.5802 2.20

ANOVA
As a whole
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups .039 2 .020 .172 .842
Within Groups 15.119 132 .115
Total 15.159 134

Post Hoc Tests

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: As a whole
Tukey HSD
Mean Difference (I- 95% Confidence Interval
(I) Age (J) Age J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound
16 17 .01944 .06461 .951 -.1337 .1726
18 -.02888 .08913 .944 -.2402 .1824
17 16 -.01944 .06461 .951 -.1726 .1337
18 -.04832 .08449 .835 -.2486 .1520
18 16 .02888 .08913 .944 -.1824 .2402
17 .04832 .08449 .835 -.1520 .2486

Homogeneous Subsets

As a whole
a,b
Tukey HSD
Subset for alpha =
0.05
Age N 1
17 68 3.5088
16 46 3.5283
18 21 3.5571
Sig. .819
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets
are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size =
35.687.
b. The group sizes are unequal. The
harmonic mean of the group sizes is used.
Type I error levels are not guaranteed.

SEX

T-Test
 Notes
Output Created 05-APR-2024 22:28:15
Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet0
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 135
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User defined missing values are
treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics for each analysis are
based on the cases with no
missing or out-of-range data for
any variable in the analysis.
Syntax T-TEST GROUPS=Sex(1 2)
/MISSING=ANALYSIS
/VARIABLES=Whole
/CRITERIA=CI(.95).
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.00
Elapsed Time 00:00:00.00

Group Statistics
Sex N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
As a whole Male 53 3.5472 .33201 .04561
Female 82 3.5073 .34022 .03757

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for Equality of Variances

F Sig. t df Sig. (2-ta

As a whole Equal variances assumed .023 .879 .671 133
Equal variances not assumed .674 113.093
T-Test

Notes
Output Created 05-APR-2024 22:37:38
Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet0
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 135
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User defined missing values are
treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics for each analysis are
based on the cases with no
missing or out-of-range data for
any variable in the analysis.
Syntax T-TEST GROUPS=Sex(1 2)
/MISSING=ANALYSIS
/VARIABLES=Pwhole Iwhole
Lwhole
/CRITERIA=CI(.95).
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.00
Elapsed Time 00:00:00.00

Group Statistics
Sex N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
Participation whole Male 53 3.6717 .41249 .05666
Female 82 3.5659 .46620 .05148
Interaction whole Male 53 3.3151 .57392 .07883
Female 82 3.3073 .51419 .05678
Learning whole Male 53 3.6472 .40173 .05518
Female 82 3.6573 .39441 .04356
 Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for Equality of Variances

F Sig. t df
Participation whole Equal variances assumed 1.766 .186 1.347 133
Equal variances not assumed 1.383 120.555
Interaction whole Equal variances assumed .819 .367 .082 133
Equal variances not assumed .080 102.279
Learning whole Equal variances assumed .996 .320 -.145 133
Equal variances not assumed -.144 109.654

Oneway

Notes
Output Created 05-APR-2024 22:39:44
Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet0
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 135
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are
treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics for each analysis are
based on cases with no missing
data for any variable in the
analysis.
Syntax ONEWAY Pwhole Iwhole Lwhole
BY Age
/STATISTICS DESCRIPTIVES
/MISSING ANALYSIS
/POSTHOC=TUKEY
ALPHA(0.05).
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.00
Elapsed Time 00:00:00.03

Descriptives
95% Confidence Interval for M
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper B
Participation whole 16 46 3.6174 .45181 .06662 3.4832
17 68 3.5971 .47973 .05818 3.4809
18 21 3.6190 .33109 .07225 3.4683
Total 135 3.6074 .44732 .03850 3.5313
Interaction whole 16 46 3.3152 .47374 .06985 3.1745
17 68 3.2809 .62992 .07639 3.1284
18 21 3.3952 .28719 .06267 3.2645
Total 135 3.3104 .53633 .04616 3.2191
Learning whole 16 46 3.6587 .46837 .06906 3.5196
17 68 3.6500 .36955 .04481 3.5605
18 21 3.6524 .31404 .06853 3.5094
Total 135 3.6533 .39584 .03407 3.5860

ANOVA
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Participation whole Between Groups .015 2 .007 .036 .964
Within Groups 26.798 132 .203
Total 26.813 134
Interaction whole Between Groups .211 2 .106 .364 .696
Within Groups 38.334 132 .290
Total 38.545 134
Learning whole Between Groups .002 2 .001 .007 .993
Within Groups 20.994 132 .159
 Total 20.996 134

Post Hoc Tests

Multiple Comparisons
Tukey HSD
Mean Difference (I- 95% Confidence Interval
Dependent Variable (I) Age (J) Age J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bo
Participation whole 16 17 .02033 .08602 .970 -.1836
18 -.00166 .11866 1.000 -.2829
17 16 -.02033 .08602 .970 -.2242
18 -.02199 .11248 .979 -.2886
18 16 .00166 .11866 1.000 -.2796
17 .02199 .11248 .979 -.2447
Interaction whole 16 17 .03434 .10288 .940 -.2095
18 -.08002 .14192 .840 -.4164
17 16 -.03434 .10288 .940 -.2782
18 -.11436 .13454 .673 -.4333
18 16 .08002 .14192 .840 -.2564
17 .11436 .13454 .673 -.2046
Learning whole 16 17 .00870 .07613 .993 -.1718
18 .00631 .10503 .998 -.2427
17 16 -.00870 .07613 .993 -.1892
18 -.00238 .09956 1.000 -.2384
18 16 -.00631 .10503 .998 -.2553
17 .00238 .09956 1.000 -.2336

Homogeneous Subsets
 Participation whole
Tukey HSDa,b
Subset for alpha =
0.05
Age N 1
17 68 3.5971
16 46 3.6174
18 21 3.6190
Sig. .977
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets
are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size =
35.687.
b. The group sizes are unequal. The
harmonic mean of the group sizes is used.
Type I error levels are not guaranteed.

Interaction whole
a,b
Tukey HSD
Subset for alpha =
0.05
Age N 1
17 68 3.2809
16 46 3.3152
18 21 3.3952
Sig. .644
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets
are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size =
35.687.
b. The group sizes are unequal. The
harmonic mean of the group sizes is used.
Type I error levels are not guaranteed.

Learning whole
Tukey HSDa,b
 Subset for alpha =
0.05
Age N 1
17 68 3.6500
18 21 3.6524
16 46 3.6587
Sig. .995
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets
are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size =
35.687.
b. The group sizes are unequal. The
harmonic mean of the group sizes is used.
Type I error levels are not guaranteed.