Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1237 - Chapter 5
1237 - Chapter 5
Research scholar has analysed data of research topic through primary and
secondary data. Secondary data was gathered from BSE website
(https://www.bseindia.com/sensex/code/35/) of 45 Hotels listed on Bombay
Stock Exchange. Data provides information regarding Revenue, Total Income,
Profit before Tax, Net Profit and Earning Per Share (EPS) of different hotel of
BSE.
Table 5.1
Income Statement Advani Hotels & Resorts (India) Ltd.
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
1|Page
2. Total Income was 60.84 crores in 2017, which was increased to 71.16
crores in 2020 and again it went down to Rs. 28.18 crores in 2021 due to
covid-19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.14.36 crores in 2017, which was Rs.14.05 in 2020 and again it
reduced to Rs. (5.45) in 2021 due to covid-19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.8.79 crores in 2017, which was increased to Rs. 11.26
in 2020 and again it went down to Rs.(4.08) crores in 2021 due to covid-19
pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.1.9 in 2017, which was enhanced to Rs.2.44 in 2020 and
again it reduced to Rs. (0.88) in 2021.
6. GST has not greatly affected Revenue, Total Income, PBT, Net Profit and
EPS of hotel industry from 2017 to 2020 but it was affected badly in 2021 due
to covid 19 pandemic.
Table 5.2
Income Statement Asian Hotels (East) Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
2|Page
It was assumed that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.98.32 crores, which was increased to Rs. 103.44
crores in 2019 and again it reduced to Rs.29.41 crores in 2021 due to covid -19
pandemic.
2. Total Income was 107.11 crores in 2017, which was increased to 113.71
crores in 2019 and again it went down to Rs. 38.75 crores in 2021 due to
covid-19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.16.89 crores in 2017, which went up to Rs.22.14 in 2020 and
again it reduced to Rs. 0.49 in 2021 due to covid-19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.12.96 crores in 2017, which was increased to Rs. 17.78 in
2019 and again it went down to Rs.0.69 crores in 2021 due to covid-19
pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.11.28 in 2017, which was enhanced to Rs.11.52 in 2019 and
again it reduced to Rs. 0.6 in 2021.
6. GST has not greatly affected Revenue, Total Income, PBT, Net Profit and
EPS of hotel industry from 2017 to 2020 but it was affected badly in 2021 due
to covid 19 pandemic.
Table 5.3
Income Statement Aruna Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Revenue 0.31 -- -- -- --
Other Income 0.02 0.11 0.83 1.15 1.81
Total Income 0.33 0.11 0.83 1.15 1.81
Expenditure -8.29 -5.77 -8.32 -2.95 -5.53
Interest -5.2 -4.03 -4.44 -0.29 -0.06
PBDT -7.96 -5.67 -7.5 -1.81 -3.72
Depreciation -0.79 -0.8 -0.8 -1.44 -1.45
PBT -8.74 -6.46 -8.3 -3.25 -5.17
Tax -1.34 -1.42 -9.85 -- --
Net Profit -10.08 -7.89 -18.15 -3.25 -5.17
Equity 9 9 9 9 9
EPS -11.2 -8.76 -20.16 -3.61 -5.75
CEPS -10.33 -7.88 -19.27 -2.01 -4.13
OPM % -894.16 -- -- -- --
NPM % 3272.73 -- -- -- --
3|Page
It was presumed that:
1. Total Income was 1.81 crores in 2017, which was reduced to 0.11 crores
in 2020 due to GST and again it went up to Rs.0.33. crores in 2021.
2. PBT was Rs.(5.17) crores in 2017, which went down to Rs.(6.46) in 2020
due to GST and again it reduced to Rs. (8.74) in 2021 due to covid-19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.(5.17) crores in 2017, which was reduced to Rs. (10.08) in
2021 due to GST and covid-19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.(5.75) in 2017, which was reuced to Rs.(11.2) in 2021 due to
GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
Table 5.4
Income Statement Asian Hotels (North) Limited
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
4|Page
2. Total Income was 260.95 crores in 2017, which was increased to
266.95 crores in 2020 and again it went down to Rs. 74.45 crores in 2021
due to covid-19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.(27.40) crores in 2017, which was reduced to Rs. (695.13)
in 2021 due to GST and covid-19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.(15.61) crores in 2017, which reduced to (695.13) crores
in 2021 due to GST and covid-19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.(8.03) in 2017, which reduced to Rs.(357.34) in 2021 due to
GST and Covid-19.
Table 5.5
Income Statement Benares Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Revenue 24.24 63.64 59.68 47.43 49.57
Other Income 0.57 0.2 0.71 0.85 1.57
Total Income 24.81 63.84 60.39 48.28 51.14
Expenditure -24.84 -43.96 -42.98 -36.25 -35.75
Interest -1 -1.08 -0.76 -0.12 --
PBDT -0.03 19.88 17.41 12.02 15.38
Depreciation -6.94 -6.38 -5.23 -4.17 -4.65
PBT -6.97 13.5 12.18 7.85 10.73
Tax 1.74 -2.89 -3.45 -1.37 -3.92
Net Profit -5.23 10.61 8.72 6.48 6.82
Equity 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
EPS -40.22 81.63 67.1 49.87 52.44
CEPS 13.12 130.72 107.32 81.97 88.2
OPM % 3.97 32.93 30.44 25.61 31.03
NPM % -21.57 16.68 14.62 13.67 13.7
It was inferred that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.49.57 crores, which was increased to Rs. 63.64
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.24.24 crores in 2021 due
to covid -19 pandemic.
2. Total Income was 51.14 crores in 2017, which was increased to 63.84
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it went down to Rs. 24.81 crores in 2021
due to covid-19 pandemic.
5|Page
3. PBT was Rs.10.73crores in 2017, which was increased to 13.50 crores in
2020 due to GST and it again it reduced to (6.97) due covid-19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.6.82 crores in 2017, which has increased to 10.61
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.(5.23) covid-19
pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.52.44 in 2017, which was increased to Rs.81.63 in 2020 due
to GST and again it was reduced to (40.22) due to Covid-19.
Table 5.6
Income Statement Best Eastern Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
6|Page
3. PBT was Rs.0.22 crores in 2017, which was increased to 0.39 crores in 2019
due to GST and it again it reduced to (0.62) due covid-19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.0.15 crores in 2017, which has increased to 0.28 crores in
2019 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.(0.57) covid-19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.0.09 in 2017, which was increased to Rs.0.17 in 2019 due to
GST and again it was reduced to (0.34) due to Covid-19.
Table 5.7
Income Statement Blue Coast Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
7|Page
4. Net Profit was Rs.(6.03) crores in 2017, which has reduced to
(194.36) crores in 2019 due to GST and again it enhanced to Rs.(14.27) .
5. EPS was Rs.(7.98) in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.(152.01) in 2019
due to GST and again it went up to (11.20) due to Covid-19.
Table 5.8
Income Statement Country Club Hospitality & Holidays Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
8|Page
Table 5.9
Income Statement CHL Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
9|Page
Table 5.10
Income Statement Cindrella Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
10 | P a g e
4. Net Profit was Rs.0.23 crores in 2017, which has reduced to (0.8) crores in
2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.0.64 in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.(2.23) in 2021 due to
GST and Covid-19.
Table 5.11
Income Statement Dhanada Corporation Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
11 | P a g e
4. Net Profit was Rs.(3.54) crores in 2017, which has reduced to (5.91)
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.(0.63) in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.(1.06) in 2021 due to
GST and Covid-19.
Table 5.12
Income Statement EIH Associated Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
12 | P a g e
4. Net Profit was Rs.42.78 crores in 2017, which has reduced to (26.74)
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.14.04 in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.(8.78) in 2021 due
to GST and Covid-19.
Table 5.13
Income Statement EIH Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
13 | P a g e
4. Net Profit was Rs.96.53 crores in 2017, which has reduced to (343.13)
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.1.69 in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.(5.72) in 2021 due
to GST and Covid-19.
Table 5.14
Income Statement Graviss Hospitality Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
14 | P a g e
3. PBT was Rs.(5.63) crores in 2017, which went down to (18.02)) crores in
2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.(3.89) crores in 2017, which has reduced to (14.18) crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.0.55 in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.(1.97) in 2021 due to
GST and Covid-19.
Table 5.15
Income Statement Gujarat Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
15 | P a g e
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.5.12 crores, which was increased to Rs. 5.92
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to 3.06 due to Covid 19
pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.4.73 crores, which was increased to Rs. 5.49 crores in
2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to 2.7 due to Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.3.87 crores, which was increased to Rs. 4.3 crores
in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to 2.27 due to Covid 19
pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.10.20 crores, which was increased to Rs. 11.35 crores
in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to 6.00 due to Covid 19
pandemic.
Table 5.16
Income Statement HLV Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
16 | P a g e
It was concluded that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.699.94 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 18.92
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
2. Total Income was 713.79 crores in 2017, which was reduced to 44.14 crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.(102.51) crores in 2017, which went up to (35.93)) crores in
2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.(102.51) crores in 2017, which has increased to (35.93)
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.(2.20) in 2017, which was increased to Rs.(0.57) in 2021 due to
GST and Covid-19.
Table 5.17
Income Statement Hotel Rugby Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Revenue -- -- -- -- --
Other Income 0.12 0.13 0.18 0.15 0.13
Total Income 0.12 0.13 0.18 0.15 0.13
Expenditure -0.17 -0.22 -3.11 -0.23 -0.17
Interest -- -- -- -- --
PBDT -0.05 -0.1 -2.93 -0.09 -0.04
Depreciation -- -- -- -- --
PBT -0.05 -0.1 -2.93 -0.09 -0.04
Tax -- -- -- -- --
Net Profit -0.05 -0.1 -2.93 -0.09 -0.04
Equity 14.32 14.32 14.32 14.32 14.32
EPS -0.04 -0.07 -2.04 -0.06 --
CEPS -0.04 -0.07 -2.04 -0.06 -0.03
OPM % -- -- -- -- --
NPM % -- -- -- --
17 | P a g e
It was interpreted that:
1. Total Income was 0.13 crores in 2017, which was reduced to 0.12 crores in
2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.(0.04) crores in 2017, which went up to (0.05)) crores in 2021
due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.(0.04) crores in 2017, which has increased to (0.05) crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.(0.06) in 2018, which was increased to Rs.(0.04) in 2021 due to
GST and Covid-19.
Table 5.18
Income Statement H.S.India Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
18 | P a g e
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.1.58 crores, which was increased to Rs. 2.51 crores in
2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. (1.53) due to Covid 19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.1.04 crores, which was increased to Rs. 1.77
crores in 2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to (1.44) due to Covid 19
pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.0.64 crores, which was increased to Rs. 1.08 crores in
2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to (0.78) due to Covid 19 pandemic.
Table 5.19
Income Statement Howard Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
19 | P a g e
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.8.92 crores, which was increased to Rs. 10.78
crores in 2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 1.73 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.(.04) crores, which was increased to Rs. (0.01) crores
in 2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. (1.64) due to Covid 19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.(0.03) crores, which was reduced to Rs. (1.51)
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.(0.03) , which was reduced to RS.(1.66) due to GST
and Covid 19 pandemic.
Table 5.20
Income Statement Indian Hotels Co.Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
20 | P a g e
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.2,445.11 crores, which was increased to Rs.
2,877.88 crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 1,243.67
due to Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.258.85 crores, which was increased to Rs. 437.74
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. (640.28) due to
Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.141.94 crores, which was increased to Rs. 401.41
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.(524.78) Covid 19
pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.1.43 , which was increased to RS. 3.38 due to GST and
again it reduced to Rs.(4.41) Covid 19 pandemic.
Table 5.21
Income Statement India Tourism Development Corporation Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
21 | P a g e
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.473.15 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 336.27
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs.175.76 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.495.14 crores, which was reduced to Rs.
357.49 crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 197.22 due
to Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.17.52 crores, which was increased to Rs. 42.68 crores
in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. (23.79) due to Covid 19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.12.05 crores, which was increased to Rs. 22.48
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.(27.20) Covid 19
pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.1.40 , which was increased to Rs. 2.15 due to GST and
again it reduced to Rs.(2.71) Covid 19 pandemic.
Table 5.22 Income Statement Jindal Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
22 | P a g e
It was construed that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.36.15 crores, which was increased to Rs. 37.73
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs.15.55 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.36.37 crores, which was incresed to Rs. 37.91
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 15.67 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.1.27 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 1.06 crores in
2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. (10.75) due to Covid 19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.0.25 crores, which was increased to Rs. 0.68
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.(10.96) Covid 19
pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.0.42, which was increased to Rs. 1.13 due to GST and
again it reduced to Rs.(17.99) Covid 19 pandemic.
Table 5.23 Income Statement Kamat Hotels (India) Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
23 | P a g e
It was inferred that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.156.67 crores, which was increased to Rs. 179.31
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs.51.62 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.164.53 crores, which was increased to Rs.
180.21 crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 52.63 due to
Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.40.58 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 35.94 crores in
2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. (37.15) due to Covid 19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.40.58 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 35.70
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.(27.57) Covid 19
pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.17.21, which was reduced to Rs. 15.14 due to GST and
again it reduced to Rs.(11.69) Covid 19 pandemic.
Table 5.24
Income Statement Kaushalya Infrastructure Development Corporation
Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
24 | P a g e
It was assumed that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.0.57 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 0.18 crores
in 2020 due to GST and again it was increased to Rs.2.27 in Covid 19
pandemic.
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.0.79 crores, which was increased to Rs. 1.00
crore in 2020 due to GST and again it was increased to Rs. 7.54 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.(4.07) crores, which was reduced to Rs. (5.80) crores in
2020 due to GST and again it was increased to Rs. 3.71 in Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.(4.01)crores, which was reduced to Rs. (5.47)
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it increased to Rs.0 in Covid 19
pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.(1.16), which was reduced to Rs. (1.58) in 2020 due to
GST and covid 19 pandemic.
Table 5.25
Income Statement Khyati Multimedia-Entertainment Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
25 | P a g e
2. Total Income in 2018 was Rs.0.06 crores, which was increased to Rs. 0.29
crore in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 0.05 due to Covid 19
pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.(0.12) crores, which was reduced to Rs. (0.15) crores in
2020 due to GST and again it was increased to Rs. (0.12) in Covid 19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.(0.13)crores, which was reduced to Rs. (0.08)
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it increased to Rs.(0.09) in Covid 19
pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.(0.12), which was reduced to Rs. (0.07) due to GST and
again it reduced to (0.08) in 2021.
Table 5.26
Income Statement Lords Ishwar Hotels Limited
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
26 | P a g e
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.5.66 crores, which was increased to Rs. 7.54
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 3.12 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.(0.12) crores, which was reduced to Rs. (0.22) crores in
2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. (0.36) due to Covid 19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.(0.12) crores, which was reduced to Rs. (0.18)
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.(0.51) Covid 19
pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.(0.16), which was increased to Rs. 0.23 due to GST and
again it reduced to Rs.(0.51) Covid 19 pandemic.
Table 5.27
Income Statement MAC Charles (India) Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
27 | P a g e
It was inferred that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.80 crores, which was increased to Rs. 78.24 crores
in 2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs.23.09 due to Covid 19
pandemic.
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.79.57 crores, which was increased to Rs. 88.80
crores in 2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 26.98 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.37.93 crores, which was increased to Rs. 61.20 crores
in 2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 2.26 due to Covid 19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.28.40 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 44.03
crores in 2019 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.1.07 Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.21.67, which was increased to Rs. 33.61 due to GST
and again it reduced to Rs.1.51 Covid 19 pandemic.
Table 5.28
Income Statement Mahindra Holidays & Resorts India Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
28 | P a g e
2. Total Income was Rs.1,105.93 crores in 2017, which was reduced to
Rs.908.76 crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.200.95 crores in 2017, which went down to 169.47 crores in
2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.130.65 crores in 2017, which has reduced to 125.77 crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.14.82 in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.9.46 in 2021 due to
GST and Covid-19.
Table 5.29
Income Statement Oriental Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
29 | P a g e
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.333.49 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 115.78
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
2. Total Income was Rs.344.61 crores in 2017, which was reduced to
Rs.123.22 crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.1.99 crores in 2017, which went down to (74.34) crores in 2021
due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.1.54 crores in 2017, which has reduced to (53.38) crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.0.09 in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.(2.99) in 2021 due to
GST and Covid-19.
Table 5.30
Income Statement Phoenix Township Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
30 | P a g e
It was concluded that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.14.53 crores, which was increased to Rs. 20.45
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs.9.33 due to Covid 19
pandemic.
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.14.90 crores, which was increased to Rs. 20.45
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 9.79 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.0.77 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 0.75 crores in
2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. (1.53) due to Covid 19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.0.37 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 0.38 crores
in 2020 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.(1.74) Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.0.37, which was reduced to Rs. 0.27 due to GST and
again it reduced to Rs.(1.25) Covid 19 pandemic.
Table 5.31
Income Statement of Polo Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Revenue 0.08 0.76 1.64 1.68 1.75
Other Income 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.01
Total Income 0.09 0.77 1.69 1.73 1.75
Expenditure -0.57 -1.06 -1.77 -2 -1.59
Interest -0.01 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.19
PBDT -0.49 -0.29 -0.08 -0.27 0.17
Depreciation -0.14 -0.14 -0.14 -0.14 -0.14
PBT -0.63 -0.44 -0.23 -0.41 0.02
Tax -- -- -- -0.1 --
Net Profit -0.63 -0.44 -0.23 -0.51 0.02
Equity 22.37 22.37 2.24 -- 22.37
EPS -0.28 -0.19 0.1 -0.23 0.01
CEPS -0.22 -0.13 -0.36 -- 0.07
OPM % -588.75 -34.91 -3.36 -13.78 20.34
NPM % -786.25 -57.44 -13.74 -30.42
31 | P a g e
3. PBT was Rs.0.02 crores in 2017, which went down to (0.63) crores in 2021
due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.0.02 crores in 2017, which has reduced to (0.63) crores in
2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.0.01 in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.(0.28) in 2021 due to
GST and Covid-19.
Table 5.32
Income Statement of Ras Resorts & Apart Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
32 | P a g e
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.1.55, which was reduced to Rs. (0.99) due to GST and
Covid 19 pandemic.
Table 5.33
Income Statement Royale Manor Hotels & Industries Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
33 | P a g e
Table 5.34
Income Statement Reliable Ventures India Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
34 | P a g e
Table 5.35
Income Statement Royal Orchid Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
35 | P a g e
Table 5.36
Income Statement of Savera Industries Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
36 | P a g e
Table 5.37
Income Statement of Sayaji Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Revenue 75.17 209.69 218.25 191.5 158.19
Other Income 7.82 3.3 2.42 2.46 1.39
Total Income 82.99 212.99 220.66 193.97 159.58
Expenditure -83.6 -187.95 -200.59 -177.28 -144.5
Interest -20.06 -21.84 -15.92 -13.75 -15.27
PBDT -0.61 25.04 20.08 16.69 15.08
Depreciation -26.08 -28.81 -20.01 -20.45 -20.74
PBT -26.69 -3.77 0.06 -3.77 -5.66
Tax 4.95 1.97 -3.16 -0.47 1.49
Net Profit -21.74 -1.8 -3.1 -4.24 -4.17
Equity 17.52 17.52 17.52 17.52 --
EPS -13.1 -1.71 -2.45 -3.1 -3.07
CEPS 2.48 15.42 9.66 9.26 --
OPM % 25.88 22.35 16.49 15.89 19.19
NPM % -28.92 -0.86 -1.42 -2.21
37 | P a g e
Table 5.38
Income Statement Sinclairs Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Revenue 17.27 45.45 45.75 45.91 47.06
Other Income 5.87 1.72 3.83 2.26 1.87
Total Income 23.14 47.17 49.58 48.17 48.93
Expenditure -13.46 -28.63 -27.97 -26.84 -27.03
Interest -0.53 -- -- -- --
PBDT 9.68 18.54 21.61 21.33 21.9
Depreciation -5.45 -6.76 -7.53 -7.38 -7.96
PBT 4.23 11.78 14.09 13.95 13.94
Tax -0.72 -2.3 -4.34 -2.21 -4.93
Net Profit 3.51 9.49 9.75 11.74 9.01
Equity 5.57 5.57 5.57 5.57 5.57
EPS 1.26 3.41 17.5 21.07 16.18
CEPS 3.22 5.83 31.01 34.33 30.47
OPM % 59.12 40.79 47.24 46.47 46.54
NPM % 20.33 20.88 21.3 25.57 1
38 | P a g e
Table 5.39
Income Statement of Sterling Green Woods Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
39 | P a g e
Table 5.40
Income Statement of Tajgvk Hotels & Resorts Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
40 | P a g e
Table 5.41
Income Statement of Tgb Banquets And Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
41 | P a g e
Table 5.42
Income Statement of The Byke of Hospitality Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
42 | P a g e
Table 5.43
Income Statement of Velan Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Revenue 0.04 3.29 6.35 8.57 11.73
Other Income 0.08 0.11 0.09 0.14 0.65
Total Income 0.12 3.39 6.44 8.71 12.38
Expenditure 0.4 -4.79 -6.87 -8.58 -29.28
Interest 0 -0.13 -0.23 -0.24 -18.37
PBDT 0.52 -1.4 -0.43 0.13 -16.89
Depreciation -1.68 -1.78 -1.8 -1.85 -1.96
PBT -1.16 -3.18 -2.23 -1.72 -18.85
Tax 1.23 -- -- -0.76 -0.67
Net Profit 0.07 -3.18 -2.23 -2.48 -19.52
Equity 31.96 31.96 31.96 31.96 31.96
EPS 0.02 -0.99 -0.7 -0.77 -6.11
CEPS 0.55 -0.44 -0.13 -0.2 -5.5
OPM % 1310 -38.53 -3.06 4.31 12.6
NPM % 177.5 -96.62 -35.09 -28.88 -1
43 | P a g e
Table 5.44
Income Statement of Viceroy Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Revenue 22.07 81.44 86.49 83.83 86.84
Other Income 2.68 6.93 2.05 17.07 --
Total Income 24.74 88.37 88.53 100.9 86.84
Expenditure -36.38 -86.69 -89.28 -521.31 -83.54
Interest -0.3 -0.52 -0.73 -20.72 -25.56
PBDT -11.64 1.68 -0.75 -420.41 -4.68
Depreciation -8.5 -8.93 -9.18 -8.33 -5.95
PBT -20.14 -7.25 -9.93 -428.74 -10.63
Tax 3.86 -1.96 -2.56 -9.89 -0.91
Net Profit -16.27 -9.2 -12.49 -438.63 -11.54
Equity 42.41 42.41 42.41 42.41 42.41
EPS -3.84 -2.17 -2.95 -103.44 -2.72
CEPS -1.83 -0.06 -0.78 -101.47 -1.32
OPM % -51.36 2.71 -0.03 -476.8 24.04
NPM % -73.74 -11.3 -14.44 -523.26 -13
44 | P a g e
Table 5.45
Income Statement of Woodsvilla Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Revenue 0.32 0.7 0.65 0.94 0.91
Other Income 0.02 0.03 0.01 0 --
Total Income 0.34 0.72 0.66 0.95 0.91
Expenditure -0.24 -0.62 -0.57 -0.88 -0.8
Interest 0 -- 0 0 0
PBDT 0.1 0.11 0.09 0.07 0.11
Depreciation -0.1 -0.1 -0.09 -0.07 -0.07
PBT 0 0.01 0 0 0.05
Tax 0 0 -0.01 0 0
Net Profit 0 0.01 -0.01 0 0.05
Equity 3.01 3.01 3.01 3.01 3.01
EPS -- -0.11 -0.09 0.24 0.16
CEPS 0.17 0.18 0.28 0.22 0.39
OPM % 32.2 15.21 14.37 7.74 12.67
NPM % 0.31 1 -0.77 -0.32 5.4
Source: https://www.bseindia.com/sensex/code/35/
45 | P a g e
Table 5.46
Statement of Revenue of Hotels for the period 2017 to 2021
(Rs. In Crores)
Hotels 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
1 27.47 70.13 70.28 62.48 59.64
2 29.41 92.1 103.44 102.14 98.32
3 0.31 0 0 0 0
4 72.58 252.39 273.52 274.44 251.19
5 24.24 63.64 59.68 47.43 49.57
6 2.34 4.3 5.18 4.79 4.77
7 0 0 52.75 134.89 132.66
8 46.5 127.72 214.68 236.8 260.39
9 10.61 53.4 62.28 63.61 63.86
10 2.48 4.79 4.78 4.62 4.18
11 2.94 9.28 11.22 10.93 8.83
12 101.39 249.08 264.18 263.57 263.56
13 432.7 1,350.30 1,543.24 1,350.28 1,277.55
14 8.9 39.47 46.72 47.2 41.47
15 0.99 3.75 3.7 3.31 3.25
16 18.92 145.68 154.34 718.54 699.94
17 0 0 0 0 0
18 10.28 25.91 28.94 26.82 22.78
19 1.72 9.71 10.65 9.29 8.72
20 1,133.15 2,743.47 2,780.41 2,583.95 2,391.25
21 175.76 336.27 349.96 343.87 473.15
22 15.55 37.73 38.03 33.78 36.15
23 51.62 179.31 192.39 168.52 156.67
24 2.27 0.18 0.23 0.13 0.57
25 0.05 0.29 0 0 0
26 3.11 7.53 8.64 6.98 5.65
27 23.09 24.57 78.24 72.96 80
28 822.25 977.01 918.29 1,064.19 1,088.73
29 115.78 289.67 345.42 356.86 333.49
30 9.33 20.45 20.04 17.81 14.53
31 0.08 0.76 1.64 1.68 1.75
32 4.46 8.9 9.17 7.62 8.72
33 7.65 21.47 23.2 22.01 18.37
34 9.98 18.29 17.62 16.33 14.82
35 47.82 114.84 112.6 102.14 91.31
36 19.62 67.29 71.87 72.44 68.67
37 75.17 209.69 218.25 191.5 158.19
46 | P a g e
38 17.27 45.45 45.75 45.91 47.06
39 2.15 2.84 3.77 4.55 2.96
40 94.17 312.62 316.87 288.25 269.77
41 14.79 33.58 79.76 118.74 136.86
42 65.61 122.19 146.77 177.41 269.98
43 0.04 3.29 6.35 8.57 11.73
44 22.07 81.44 86.49 83.83 86.84
45 0.32 0.7 0.65 0.94 0.91
Statement of Revenue
100%
80%
2018 45.00
70% 204597.11
9152.11 203.38
60%
Table No. 5.47 Statement of Revenue for the period 2017 to 2021
47 | P a g e
H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 5 Years.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.72 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.41 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Research Scholar
concluded that there is no significant difference in Revenue of Hotels
listed on BSE during the period 2017 to 2021.
48 | P a g e
Table No.5.49 Statement of Total Income of Hotels for the period 2017 to
2021
(Rs. In Crores)
Hotels 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
1 28.18 71.16 71.73 63.82 60.84
2 38.75 101.08 113.71 107.75 107.11
3 0.33 0.11 0.83 1.15 1.81
4 74.45 266.95 281.68 305.55 260.95
5 24.81 63.84 60.39 48.28 51.14
6 2.34 4.3 5.2 4.84 4.93
7 0.08 0.1 55.22 136.32 133.79
8 52.3 127.72 214.68 236.8 260.39
9 16.81 60.74 70.76 64.34 64.8
10 2.6 4.94 4.79 4.63 4.18
11 3.02 9.36 11.37 11.01 9.09
12 104.45 258.07 273.7 269.27 271.68
13 473.64 1,434.31 1,627.26 1,434.04 1,376.78
14 10.23 40.16 47.55 47.44 42.23
15 3.06 5.92 5.66 5.02 5.12
16 44.14 152.19 158.52 743.12 713.79
17 0.12 0.13 0.18 0.15 0.13
18 10.5 26.32 29.55 27.44 23.38
19 1.73 9.84 10.78 9.52 8.92
20 1,243.67 2,877.88 2,870.91 2,639.34 2,445.11
21 197.22 357.49 371.73 370.64 495.14
22 15.67 37.91 38.18 34.81 36.37
23 52.63 180.21 194.19 175.29 164.53
24 7.54 1 26.25 0.17 0.79
25 0.05 0.29 0.01 0.06 0
26 3.12 7.54 8.65 7 5.66
27 26.98 28 88.8 83.59 79.57
28 908.76 1,037.12 963.44 1,094.19 1,105.93
29 123.22 301.34 356.72 368.88 344.61
30 9.79 20.45 20.58 18.12 14.9
31 0.09 0.77 1.69 1.73 1.75
32 4.54 9.33 9.27 7.78 8.72
33 9.01 22.16 23.93 22.32 18.37
34 10.17 19.43 18.1 16.64 15.24
35 53.4 122.01 120.04 108.13 99.55
36 20.77 67.9 72.58 73.12 68.67
37 82.99 212.99 220.66 193.97 159.58
38 23.14 47.17 49.58 48.17 48.93
39 2.55 3.19 4.26 4.92 2.96
49 | P a g e
40 96.81 313.84 324.09 290.88 269.77
41 16.26 53.9 86.28 123.23 139.66
42 66.5 123.19 147.68 178.18 270.12
43 0.12 3.39 6.44 8.71 12.38
44 2.68 6.93 2.05 17.07 0
45 0.34 0.72 0.66 0.95 0.91
Series1Series2Series3Series4Series5
Table No. 5.50 Statement of Total Income for the period 2017 to 2021
50 | P a g e
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.64 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.41 and P-value is also more than 0.05 i.e 0.63. Research
Scholar concluded that there is no significant difference in Total Income
of Hotels listed on BSE during the period 2017 to 2021.
Table No.5.51
Descriptive Statistics of Total Income of 2018 (Before After GST) and
2017 (Before GST)
2018 (After GST) 2017 (Before GST)
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2017 and 2018.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2017 and 2018
Years.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value 0.05 is less than Z
critical value 1.96. Research Scholar concluded that there is no significant
difference in Total Income of Hotels listed on BSE during the period 2017
to 2018.
51 | P a g e
Table No.5.52 Statement of Profit before Tax of Hotels for the period 2017
to 2021
(Rs. In Crores)
Hotels 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
1 -5.45 14.05 13.93 12.91 14.36
2 0.49 22.14 24.44 18.74 16.89
3 -8.74 -6.46 -8.3 -3.25 -5.17
4 -695.13 -73.95 -42.08 -2.75 -27.4
5 -6.97 13.5 12.18 7.85 10.73
6 -0.62 -0.4 0.39 0.2 0.22
7 -14.27 -21.32 -193.79 -1.66 -6.64
8 -38.23 -40.27 -15.43 -10.03 -7.01
9 -6.96 4.75 12.93 13.27 10.59
10 -0.82 1.62 0.39 0.36 0.33
11 -5.91 -3.33 -1.65 -2.99 -3.54
12 -37.15 43 58.35 58.66 64.93
13 -443.05 109.1 163.7 173.86 127.85
14 -18.02 -11.32 -5.14 -0.73 -5.63
15 2.7 5.49 5.18 4.53 4.73
16 -35.93 -20.19 -37.8 -23.22 -102.51
17 -0.05 -0.1 -2.93 -0.09 -0.04
18 -1.53 1.35 2.51 1.76 1.58
19 -1.64 -0.57 -0.01 -0.31 -0.04
20 -640.28 437.74 417.54 284.23 258.85
21 -23.79 42.68 62.23 44.94 17.52
22 -10.75 1.06 1.65 0.31 1.27
23 -37.15 35.94 35.82 51.09 40.58
24 3.71 -5.8 16.52 -1.12 -4.07
25 -0.12 -0.15 -0.13 -0.06 -0.12
26 -0.36 0.22 0.25 0.11 -0.12
27 2.26 1.01 61.2 29.24 37.93
28 169.47 123.95 100.17 207.15 200.95
29 -75.34 -3.59 102.42 8.53 1.99
30 -1.53 0.75 1.15 0.85 0.77
31 -0.63 -0.44 -0.23 -0.41 0.02
32 -0.52 0.04 0.65 0.36 0.78
33 0.29 3.04 4.13 3.12 1.3
34 -0.6 2.57 2.21 0.16 1.91
35 -38.96 12.92 18.22 15.49 9.95
36 -4.54 5.9 9.26 6.8 4.6
37 -26.69 -3.77 0.06 -3.77 -5.66
38 4.23 11.78 14.09 13.95 13.94
52 | P a g e
39 -0.37 -1.6 -0.87 0.43 0.7
40 -36 35.94 38.13 32.01 18.61
41 -8.36 0.42 -45.78 -12.75 -7.89
42 -19.92 2.46 7.6 55.08 48.47
43 -1.16 -3.18 -2.23 -1.72 -18.85
44 -20.14 -7.25 -9.93 -428.74 -10.63
45 0 0.01 0 0 0.05
Table No. 5.53 Descriptive Statistics of Profit before tax for the period
2017 to 2021
Statement of PBT
100%
90%
9134.44
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% 2009576.44 220.00 3.80 0.01 2.41
20%
34731.12
10%
0%
138924.47 4.00
SS df MS F P-value F crit
53 | P a g e
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 5 Years.
H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 5 Years.
Conclusion: Alternative hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 3.80 is
more than F critical value i.e 2.41 and P-value is also less than 0.05.
Research Scholar concluded that there is significant difference in Total
Income of Hotels listed on BSE during the period 2017 to 2021.
2018
(After
GST) 2017 (Before GST)
Mean 12.28 15.71
Known Variance 7866.86 3090.84
Observations 45.00 45.00
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0.00
z -0.22
P(Z<=z) two-tail 0.83
z Critical two-tail 1.96
54 | P a g e
Table No.5.55 Statement of Net Profit of Hotels for the period 2017 to
2021
(Rs. In Crores)
Hotels 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
1 -4.08 11.26 11.37 8.63 8.79
2 0.69 13.87 17.78 14.74 12.96
3 -10.08 -7.89 -18.15 -3.25 -5.17
4 -695.14 -63.13 -32.78 -2.42 -15.61
5 -5.23 10.61 8.72 6.48 6.82
6 -0.57 -0.35 0.28 0.25 0.15
7 -14.27 -21.32 -194.36 -1.66 -6.03
8 -41.46 -44.97 -21.92 -17.25 -14.91
9 -6.43 2.87 9.81 8.23 6.91
10 -0.8 1.51 0.28 0.27 0.23
11 -5.91 -3.33 -1.65 -2.99 -3.54
12 -26.74 37.96 37.94 37.79 42.78
13 -343.13 124.47 113.33 112.27 96.53
14 -14.18 -8.77 -1.81 -0.7 -3.89
15 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79
16 -35.93 193.71 -118.9 -23.22 -102.51
17 -0.05 -0.1 -2.93 -0.09 -0.04
18 -1.44 1.26 1.77 1.93 1.04
19 -1.51 -0.77 0 -0.06 -0.03
20 -524.78 401.41 263.7 147.77 141.94
21 -27.2 22.48 42.16 23.62 12.05
22 -10.96 0.68 1.5 0.92 0.25
23 -27.57 35.7 25.07 37.89 40.58
24 0 -5.47 22.53 -0.99 -4.01
25 -0.09 -0.08 -0.13 -0.04 -0.13
26 -0.38 0.18 0.23 -0.2 -0.12
27 1.07 12.46 44.03 21.07 28.4
28 125.77 -108.22 63.86 134.36 130.65
29 -53.38 -3.79 89.44 6 1.54
30 -1.74 0.38 0.78 0.63 0.52
31 -0.63 -0.44 -0.23 -0.51 0.02
32 -0.39 0.09 0.44 0.32 0.62
33 0.28 2.52 3.3 2.51 1.02
34 -0.64 1.85 1.81 0.24 1.38
35 -34.55 9.11 12.62 10.98 9.91
36 -4.1 4.28 6.28 5.13 2.38
37 -21.74 -1.8 -3.1 -4.24 -4.17
38 3.51 9.49 9.75 11.74 9.01
39 -0.31 -1.16 -0.88 0.45 0.74
55 | P a g e
40 -26.45 23.85 24.32 21 10.36
41 -8.25 0.86 -53.92 0.54 -6.61
42 -18.24 4.15 5.06 36.02 31.7
43 0.07 -3.18 -2.23 -2.48 -19.52
44 -16.27 -9.2 -12.49 -438.63 -11.54
45 0 0.01 -0.01 0 0.05
1377.91
100%
2017 45.00
5717.87
80%
3554.12
2018 45.00
5180.45
60%
2019 45.00
405.29 9.01
40%
45.00 156.84 3.49
2020 356.46 7.92 18819.72
20%
2021 45.00 646.84 14.37
0%
Year Count Sum Average Variance
-20%
-1849.44 -41.10
-40%
-60%
Series1Series2Series3Series4Series5
56 | P a g e
Table No. 5.56 Descriptive Statistics of Net Profit for the period 2017 to
2021
Table No. 5.57 Descriptive Statistics of Net Profit for the period 2017 to
2018
2018 (After GST) 2017 (Before GST)
57 | P a g e
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value (0.44) is less than Z
critical value 1.96. P value is also more than 0.05 ie. 0.66. Research
Scholar concluded that there is no significant difference in Profit before
Tax of Hotels listed on BSE during the period 2017 to 2018.
Table No. 5.58 Statement of Earnings per Share of Hotels for the
period 2017 to 2021
Hotels 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
1 -0.88 2.44 2.46 1.87 1.9
2 0.6 12.03 15.42 12.79 11.28
3 -11.2 -8.76 -20.16 -3.61 -5.75
4 -357.34 -32.45 -16.85 -1.24 -8.03
5 -40.22 81.63 67.1 49.87 52.44
6 -0.34 -0.21 0.17 0.15 0.09
7 -11.2 -16.72 -152.01 -1.31 -7.98
8 -2.54 -2.75 -1.34 -1.06 -0.91
9 -1.09 0.52 1.8 1.5 1.26
10 -2.23 4.24 0.78 0.77 0.64
11 -1.06 -0.59 -0.3 -0.54 -0.63
12 -8.78 12.46 12.45 12.4 14.04
13 -5.72 2.18 1.98 1.96 1.69
14 -1.97 -1.28 -0.24 -0.15 0.55
15 6 11.35 10.77 8.9 10.2
16 -0.57 -0.32 -0.6 -0.43 -2.2
17 -0.04 -0.07 -2.04 -0.06 0
18 -0.78 0.76 1.08 1.19 0.64
19 -1.66 -0.84 0 -0.28 -0.03
20 -4.41 3.38 2.22 1.34 1.43
21 -2.71 2.15 5.38 2.23 1.4
22 -17.99 1.13 2.49 1.53 0.42
23 -11.69 15.14 10.63 16.07 17.21
24 0 -1.58 6.5 -0.28 -1.16
25 -0.08 -0.07 -0.12 -0.04 -0.12
26 -0.51 0.23 0.3 -0.26 -0.16
27 1.51 0.94 33.61 1.61 21.67
28 9.46 -8.14 4.81 10.14 14.82
29 -2.99 -0.21 5.01 0.34 0.09
30 -1.25 0.27 0.56 0.04 0.37
31 -0.28 -0.19 0.1 -0.23 0.01
32 -0.99 0.22 1.1 0.8 1.55
33 0.16 1.49 1.95 1.48 0.59
34 0.14 1.35 1.71 0 1.26
35 -12.6 3.41 4.59 4.03 3.64
58 | P a g e
36 -3.44 3.59 5.27 4.3 1.99
37 -13.1 -1.71 -2.45 -3.1 -3.07
38 1.26 3.41 17.5 21.07 16.18
39 -0.74 -2.74 -2.08 1.06 1.73
40 -4.17 3.72 3.87 3.38 1.63
41 -2.82 0.29 -18.41 0.19 0
42 -4.55 1.03 1.26 8.98 7.9
43 0.02 -0.99 -0.7 -0.77 -6.11
44 -3.84 -2.17 -2.95 -103.44 -2.72
45 0 -0.11 -0.09 0.24 0.16
Table No. 5.59 Descriptive Statistics of Earning Per Share for the period
2017 to 2021
100%
90%
832.97
80%
70%
60%
50%
40% 183253.97 220.00 1.93 0.11 2.41
30%
20%
1610.65
10%
6442.614.00
0%
SSdfMSFP-valueF crit
59 | P a g e
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 5 Years.
H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 5 Years.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.93 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.41 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Research Scholar
concluded that there is no significant difference in Earning Per Share vof
Hotels listed on BSE during the period 2017 to 2021.
Table No. 5.60 Descriptive Statistics of Earning Per Share for the period
2017 to 2018
2018 2017
2018 2017
Mean 1.19 3.33
Known Variance 329.72 96.64
Observations 45.00 45.00
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0.00
z -0.70
P(Z<=z) two-tail 0.49
z Critical two-tail 1.96
60 | P a g e
Table No.5.61 Statement of Cash Earnings per Share of Hotels for the
period 2017 to 2021
Hotels 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
1 -0.18 3.25 3.25 2.63 2.7
2 3.28 14.61 19.7 17.5 16.77
3 -10.33 -7.88 -19.27 -2.01 -4.13
4 -348.69 -23.24 -6.95 9.02 0
5 13.12 130.72 107.32 81.97 88.2
6 0.05 0.21 0.58 0.56 0.51
7 -11.11 -16.64 -149.98 3.99 0.47
8 -1.56 -1.74 -0.3 0.04 0.27
9 -0.74 1.02 2.21 1.9 1.67
10 0 0 0 0 2.12
11 -0.93 -0.46 -0.12 -0.32 -0.32
12 -3.21 17.7 17.13 17.03 18.7
13 -3.57 4.53 4.14 3.87 3.62
14 -1.23 -0.38 0.46 0.71 0.12
15 6.12 11.47 10.89 9.02 10.33
16 -0.36 3.26 -1.73 1.62 2.14
17 -0.04 -0.07 -2.04 -0.06 -0.03
18 -0.04 1.76 2.15 2.49 2.24
19 -1 -0.11 0.84 0 0
20 -2.7 5.09 3.64 2.52 2.96
21 -2.39 3.46 5.75 3.59 2.32
22 -9.13 9.73 0 0 10.69
23 -7.27 19.12 14.9 20.53 0
24 0.11 -1.46 6.63 -0.16 -1.03
25 0 0 -0.12 0 -0.09
26 -0.12 0.54 0.71 0.17 0.39
27 3.53 12.24 37.4 20.05 0
28 17.27 -0.49 8.67 14.25 21.67
29 -1.38 1.34 6.6 1.88 1.48
30 0.54 2.06 2.3 1.91 1.72
31 -0.22 -0.13 -0.36 0 0.07
32 0.32 1.58 2.23 1.59 2.41
33 0.7 2.05 2.58 2.1 1.2
34 0.3 2.94 3.05 2.68 2.51
35 -9.41 6.34 6.07 5.63 0
36 -0.32 7.43 8.18 7.33 5.72
37 2.48 15.42 9.66 9.26 0
38 3.22 5.83 31.01 34.33 30.47
39 0.61 -1.64 -0.51 2.67 3.46
40 -4.17 3.72 3.87 3.38 1.63
41 -2.13 1.34 -17.47 1.87 4.39
61 | P a g e
42 2.05 8.03 4.99 12.39 11.09
43 0.55 -0.44 -0.13 -0.2 -5.5
44 -1.83 -0.06 -0.78 -101.47 -1.32
45 0.17 0.18 0.28 0.22 0.39
Statements of CEPS
444.64
2718.79 420.29 869.94
Variance 205.42
45.0045.0045.0045.0045.00
Count
20212020201920182017
62 | P a g e
Table No. 5.62 Descriptive Statistics of Cash Earning Per Share for the
period 2017 to 2021
Table No. 5.63 Descriptive Statistics of Cash Earning Per Share for the
period 2017 to 2018
2018 2017
63 | P a g e
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2
Years. H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2
Years.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value 0.27) is less than Z
critical value 1.96. Research Scholar concluded that there is no significant
difference in Cash Earning Per Share of Hotels listed on BSE during the
period 2017 to 2018.
64 | P a g e
33 28.36 23.65 26.71 25.24 24.99
34 4 21.68 21.4 17.74 22.39
35 -45.28 25.14 23.76 24.58 22.14
36 -1.89 16.41 18.43 15.88 15.66
37 25.88 22.35 16.49 15.89 19.19
38 59.12 40.79 47.24 46.47 46.54
39 25.65 -3.49 17.23 39.56 68.63
40 0.49 24.11 24.11 25.76 24.39
41 -35.28 14.06 -52.2 -3.89 19.92
42 22.69 30.35 16.75 39.16 23.09
43 1310 -38.53 -3.06 4.31 12.6
44 -51.36 2.71 -0.03 -476.8 24.04
45 32.2 15.21 14.37 7.74 12.67
Table No. 5.65 Descriptive Statistics of Operating Profit Margin for the
period 2017 to 2021
Anova: Single Factor
Year Count Sum Average Variance
2021 45.00 -958.11 -21.29 84968.78
-
2020 45.00 1808.10 -40.18 151832.64
2019 45.00 8645.22 192.12 1343931.02
2018 45.00 111.58 2.48 10041.15
2017 45.00 349.96 7.78 12592.76
F crit 2.41
P-value 0.30
F 1.23
MS 394563.54 320673.27
df 4.00 220.00
SS 1578254.14 70548119.42
65 | P a g e
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 5 Years.
H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 5 Years.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.23 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.41 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Research Scholar
concluded that there is no significant difference in Operating Profit
Margin of Hotels listed on BSE during the period 2017 to 2021.
Table No. 5.66 Descriptive Statistics of Operating Profit Margin for the
period 2017 to 2018
2018 2017
66 | P a g e
Table No.5.67 Statement of Net Profit Margin of Hotels for the period
2017 to 2021
Hotels 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
1 -14.86 16.06 16.18 13.82 14.73
2 2.35 15.06 17.19 14.43 13.1
3 - 0 0 0 0
3272.73
4 -957.71 -25.01 -11.98 -0.88 -6.2
5 -21.57 16.68 14.62 13.67 13.7
6 -24.48 -8.17 5.4 5.29 3.1
7 0 0 -368.5 -1.23 -4.5
8 -89.17 -35.21 -10.21 -7.28 -5.73
9 -60.58 5.37 15.75 12.94 10
10 -32.07 31.54 5.84 5.93 5
11 -201.4 -35.87 -14.74 -27.39 -40.15
12 -26.37 15.24 14.36 14.34 1
13 -79.3 9.22 7.34 8.31 7
14 -159.33 -22.22 -3.87 -1.48 -9.38
15 228.8 114.71 110.27 101.78 118
16 -189.9 132.97 -77.04 -3.23 -14.65
17 0 0 0 0 0
18 -13.98 4.87 6.11 7.18 4.5
19 -88.05 -7.88 -0.04 -0.65 0.34
20 -46.31 14.63 9.48 5.72 5.94
21 -15.48 6.68 12.05 6.87 2.5
22 -70.45 1.8 3.94 2.72 0.6
23 -53.41 19.91 13.03 22.48 25.9
24 0.13 -3022.1 10011.56 -757.69 -7
25 -185.42 -27.97 0 0 0
26 -12.25 2.32 2.64 -2.86 -2.12
27 4.62 50.72 56.28 28.87 35.5
28 15.3 -11.08 6.95 12.63 12
29 -46.1 -1.31 25.89 1.68 0.46
30 -18.66 1.83 3.89 3.53 3.57
31 -786.25 -57.44 -13.74 -30.42 1.14
32 -8.83 0.99 4.77 4.18 7
33 3.65 11.74 14.24 11.42 5
34 -6.38 10.12 10.26 1.45 9
35 -72.24 7.94 11.21 10.75 10.85
67 | P a g e
36 -20.88 6.36 8.74 7.09 3.4
37 -28.92 -0.86 -1.42 -2.21 -2.64
38 20.33 20.88 21.3 25.57 1
39 -14.53 -40.88 -23.38 9.9 25
40 -28.09 7.63 7.68 7.29 3.84
41 -55.76 2.57 -67.6 0.46 -4.83
42 -27.8 3.39 3.45 20.3 11.74
43 177.5 -96.62 -35.09 -28.88 -1
44 -73.74 -11.3 -14.44 -523.26 -13
45 0.31 1 -0.77 -0.32 5.4
Statement of NPM
100% 19149.54
2017 45.00 427.49
80%
2018 45.00
60% 2233319.02
201945.00 249.11 5.54
40%
2020 45.00
9797.60 217.72
20%
204682.06
2021 45.00
264310.34
0%
Year Count Sum Average Variance
-6350.01 -141.11
-20%
-2871.69 -63.82
-40%
-1007.18 -22.38
-60%
Series1Series2Series3Series4Series5
68 | P a g e
Table No. 5.68 Descriptive Statistics of Net Profit Margin for the period
2017 to 2021
ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 3236267.25 4.00 809066.81 1.49 0.21 2.41
Table No. 5.69 Descriptive Statistics of Net Profit Margin for the period
2017 to 2018
69 | P a g e
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2
Years. H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2
Years.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value (1.34) is less than Z
critical value 1.96. P Value is also greater than 0.05 i.e 0.18. Research
Scholar concluded that there is no significant difference in Net Profit
Margin of Hotels listed on BSE during the period 2017 to 2028.
70 | P a g e
Questionnaire relating to General Public:
Data was collected from 100 respondents of General public of Mumbai,
Thane, Kalyan, Ambernath and Ulhasnagar cities. Data was analysed
through Anova (F) test and Z test.
Figure 5.9 Prices of food have gone up due to Goods and Service Tax
100%
90%
50 92 1.84 0.67
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
50 95 1.9 0.79
30%
20%
10%
0%
Count Sum Average Variance
Female 50 92 1.84 0.67
Male 50 95 1.9 0.79
MaleFemale
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 0.09 1 0.09 0.12 0.73 3.94
71 | P a g e
and Mean of Female. Hence, H0 has failed to reject. Researcher has
concluded that prices of food have gone up due to GST.
Other C ities,
Mumbai, 15.0 0 Thane, 15
.00 Kalyan , 15.00 15.00
CountSumAverageVariance
72 | P a g e
ANOVA
Figure 5.11 Quality of food served in the has declined due to GST
(Genderwise)
120.00
100.00
80.00
60.00
50.0 50.00
0
40.00
20.00
3.16 2.94 1.16 1.12
0.00
Count Sum Average Variance
Male 50.00 158.00 3.16 1.16
Female 50.00 147.00 2.94 1.12
Male Female
Quality of food served in the hotels has declined due to Goods and Service Tax
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F
crit
Between Groups 1.21 1.00 1.21 1.06 0.31 3.94
73 | P a g e
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
74 | P a g e
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.06 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.94 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Hence, Research
scholar has concluded that quality of food service in the hotel has declined
due to GST.
Figure No. 5.12 Quality of Services provided in the hotels have dropped
due to GST (Citywise)
90%
80%
1.18
70%
60%
66.27 56.00
50% 1.15 0.34 2.77
40%
30%
1.36
20%
10%
4.073.00
0%
SSdf MS F P-value F crit
Within Groups 66.2756.00 1.18
Between Groups 4.073.00 1.36
1.15 0.34 2.77
75 | P a g e
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.15 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.77 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Hence, Research
scholar has concluded that quality of services in the hotel has declined
due to GST.
Quality of services provided in the hotels have dropped due to Goods and
Service Tax (GST)
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Male 50.00 165.00 3.30 1.03
Female 50.00 151.00 3.02 1.08
Figure 5.13 Quality of Services provided in the hotels have dropped due to
GST (Genderwise)
100%
90%
80% 1.06
70%
60%
50%
40% 103.48 98.00 1.86 0.18 3.94
30%
20%
10% 1.96
0%
1.96 1.00
SS df MS F P-value F crit
Within Groups 103.48 98.00 1.06
Between Groups 1.96 1.00 1.96
1.86 0.18 3.94
76 | P a g e
scholar has concluded that quality of services in the hotel has declined
due to GST.
Prices of hotel rooms have gone up after implementation of Goods and Service
Tax
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 15.00 33.00 2.20 1.46
Thane 15.00 31.00 2.07 1.78
Kalyan 15.00 28.00 1.87 0.55
Other cities 15.00 27.00 1.80 0.60
0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.0060.0070.00
SS df MS F P-value F crit
Within Groups 61.47 56.00 1.10
Between Groups 1.52 3.00 0.51
0.46 0.71 2.77
77 | P a g e
Prices of hotel rooms have gone up after implementation of Goods and Service
Tax
0.09
1.00 0.09
0.13
0.71
3.94
SSdfMSFP-valueF crit
78 | P a g e
Benefit of Goods and Service Tax (Input Tax Credit) hotel owner are passing
to customers.
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 15.00 48.00 3.20 1.17
Thane 15.00 44.00 2.93 1.50
Kalyan 15.00 44.00 2.93 1.07
Other cities 15.00 51.00 3.40 1.40
Figure 5.16 Benefit of Goods and Service Tax (Input Tax Credit) hotel
owner are passing to customers (Citywise)
0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.0060.0070.0080.00
SS df MS F P-value F crit
Within Groups 71.87 56.00 1.28
Between Groups 2.32 3.00 0.77 0.60 0.62 2.77
79 | P a g e
Figure 5.17 Benefit of Goods and Service Tax (Input Tax Credit) hotel
owner are passing to customers (Genderwise)
ANOVA
Source of SS df MS F P- F crit
Variation value
Between Groups 0.22 1.00 0.22 0.19 0.67 3.93
80 | P a g e
Figure 5.18 Customers visits to hotels for food have gone down after
implementation of Goods and Services Tax (Citywise)
MumbaiThaneKalyanOther cities
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F
crit
Between Groups 7.80 3.00 2.60 1.88 0.14 2.77
81 | P a g e
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Male 50.00 139.00 2.78 0.87
Female 50.00 132.00 2.64 1.30
Figure 5.19 Customers visits to hotels for food have gone down after
implementation of Goods and Services Tax (Genderwise)
90%
80%
70% 1.08
60%
40%
30%
20%
0.49
10%
0% 0.49 1.00
SS df MS F P-value F crit
Within Groups 106.10 98.00 1.08
Between Groups 0.49 1.00 0.49
0.45 0.50 3.94
82 | P a g e
Figure 5.20 In Post GST era, your orders for foods from hotels have
reduced due to Goods and Service Tax (Citywise)
35 34.00
30
25 24.00
20
15 15 15 15
15
10
MumbaiThaneKalyanOther cities
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F
P-value F
crit
Between Groups 13.78 3.00 4.59 2.30 0.09 2.77
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 2.30 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.77 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that In Post GST era, customers orders for foods from hotels
have reduced due to Goods and Service Tax.
83 | P a g e
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Male 50.00 116.00 2.32 2.39
Female 50.00 112.00 2.24 2.02
Figure 5.21 In Post GST era, your orders for foods from hotels have
reduced due to Goods and Service Tax (Genderwise)
F crit 3.94
P-value 0.79
F 0.07
MS 0.16 2.20
df 1.00 98.00
SS 0.16 216.00
SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 0.16 1.00 0.16 0.07 0.79 3.94
Within Groups 216.00 98.00 2.20
84 | P a g e
Figure 5.22 In Post GST era, your family has reduced vacation/business
trips due to high price of hotels rooms (Citywise)
Mumbai
32.00
2.13
3.69
1.55
15.00
CountSumAverageVariance
Thane
37.00
2.47
4.59
2.12
15.00
CountSumAverageVariance
85 | P a g e
Kalyan
19.00
1.27
1.48
15.00 0.21
CountSumAverageVariance
Other cities
33.00
2.20
4.51
2.31
15.00
CountSumAverageVariance
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F
crit
Between Groups 12.18 3.00 4.06 2.62 0.06 2.77
86 | P a g e
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Male 50.00 113.00 2.26 1.87
Female 50.00 98.00 1.96 1.75
Figure 5.23 In Post GST era, your family has reduced vacation/business
trips due to high price of hotels rooms (Genderwise)
SS
1.24, 11% df MS F
2.25, 21% 3.94, 36% P-value
F crit
4.21, 38%
1.00, 9%
0.27, 2%
2.25, 21%
87 | P a g e
Figure 5.24 Cost of food has increased due to GST, hence price of food has
also increased in hotels (Citywise)
35.00
30.00
25.00
25.00
20.00 32.00
15.00 21.00
15.00 15.00
15.00 25.00
10.00 15.00 1.67
1.10 Other Cities
1.40
5.00 0.26 Kalyan
2.13
1.55 Thane
0.00 1.67
1.10
Count Mumbai
Sum
Average
Variance
MumbaiThaneKalyanOther Cities
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F
crit
Between Groups 4.18 3.00 1.39 1.39 0.25 2.77
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.39 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.77 and P-value is also more than 0.05.Researcher
concluded that Cost of food has increased due to GST, hence price of food
has also increased in hotels.
88 | P a g e
Figure 5.25 Cost of food has increased due to GST, hence price of food has
also increased in hotels (Citywise)
100.00
90.00 84.00
80.00
70.00
60.0050.00
50.00
90.00
40.00
30.00
50.00
20.00
10.00 1.68 0.71
0.00 1.80 0.78
Count Sum Average Variance
Male 50.00 90.00 1.80 0.78
Female 50.00 84.00 1.68 0.71
MaleFemale
ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 0.36 1.00 0.36 0.48 0.49 3.94
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =0.48 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.94 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that Cost of food has increased due to GST, hence price of food
has also increased in hotels.
89 | P a g e
Cost of accommodation of hotels rooms has increased due to GST, hence
rent of hotels has gone up
F CRIT
2.78
P-VALUE
0.10
F
2.20
MS0.84
1.86
52.00
DF 3.00
43.86
SS
5.57
90 | P a g e
concluded that Cost of accommodation of hotels rooms has increased due
to GST, hence rent of hotels has gone up.
COST OF ACCOMMODATION OF
HOTELS ROOMS HAS
INCREASED DUE TO GST, HENCE RENT OF HOTELS HAS GONE UP
MaleFemale
ANOVA
Source of SS df MS F P- F crit
Variation value
Between Groups 0.01 1.00 0.01 0.02 0.90 3.94
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.02 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.94 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
inferred that Cost of accommodation of hotels rooms has increased due to
GST, hence rent of hotels has gone up.
91 | P a g e
Figure 5.28 Goods and Service Tax rates on sale of food in hotels and rent
on hotel rooms must be reduced (Citywise)
35.00 32.00
30.00
25.00 24.0205.00
23.00
20.00
15.0105.0105.0105.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
1.532.131.601.67 1.121.410.690.67
0.00
Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 15.00 23.00 1.53 1.12
Thane 15.00 32.00 2.13 1.41
Kalyan 15.00 24.00 1.60 0.69
Other cities 15.00 25.00 1.67 0.67
MumbaiThaneKalyanOther cities
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F
crit
Between Groups 3.33 3.00 1.11 1.14 0.34 2.77
92 | P a g e
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Male 50.00 80.00 1.60 0.86
Female 50.00 84.00 1.68 0.59
Figure 5.29 Goods and Service Tax rates on sale of food in hotels and rent
on hotel rooms must be reduced (Genderwise)
100.00 98.00
90.00
80.00 70.88
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.000.16 0.16
0.00 1.00
0.72 0.220
SS 0.640
df 3.94
MS 0
F
P-value
F crit
SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 0.16 1.00 0.16 0.22 0.64 3.94
Within Groups 70.88 98.00 0.72
93 | P a g e
Mumbai Hotel industry has affected badly in Covid 19 Pandemic
(Citywise)
F crit 2.77
P-value 0.25
F 1.40
1.03
MS 1.44
56.00
df 3.00
57.60
SS 4.33
SS df MS F P-value F crit
Within Groups 57.60 56.00 1.03
Between Groups 4.33 3.00 1.44 1.40 0.25 2.77
94 | P a g e
concluded that Mumbai Hotel industry has affected badly in Covid 19
Pandemic.
Figure 5.31 Mumbai Hotel industry has affected badly in Covid 19
Pandemic (Genderwise)
MaleFemale
71.00
50.00
77.00
50.00
1.42 0.25
1.54
0.62
Count Sum Average Variance
Female 50.00 71.00 1.42 0.25
Male 50.00 77.00 1.54 0.62
ANOVA
Source of SS df MS F P- F crit
Variation value
Between Groups 0.36 1.00 0.36 0.83 0.37 3.94
95 | P a g e
Are you ordering food from hotels at home in Covid 19 Pandemic period?
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 15.00 35.00 2.33 2.52
Thane 15.00 35.00 2.33 1.52
Kalyan 15.00 32.00 2.13 2.41
Other cities 15.00 43.00 2.87 2.12
Figure 5.32 Are you ordering food from hotels at home in Covid 19
Pandemic period (Citywise)
F crit 2.77
P-value 0.56
F 0.69
MS 1.48 2.15
df 3 .00 56.00
SS 4 .45 120.13
96 | P a g e
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.69 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.77 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that customers were ordering food from hotels at home in
Covid 19 Pandemic period.
Figure 5.33 Are you ordering food from hotels at home in Covid 19
Pandemic period (Genderwise)
90%
80%
56.00 133.00 2.38 1.98
70%
60%
50%
40%
56.00 131.00 2.34 1.83
30%
20%
MaleFemale
ANOVA
Source of SS df MS F P- F crit
Variation value
Between Groups 0.04 1.00 0.04 0.02 0.89 3.93
97 | P a g e
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.02 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.93 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that customers were ordering food from hotels at home in
Covid 19 Pandemic period.
Figure 5.34 Visits to hotels for food have gone down in Covid 19
Pandemic period
60.00
CountSumAverageVariance
1.46
50.00 2.20
1.70
1.87 1.67
40.00 1.67
0.60
1.20
30.00 33.00
28.00
25.00
18.00
20.00
10.00
15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00
0.00
Mumbai Thane Kalyan Other cities
Variance 1.70 1.67 1.46 0.60
Average 1.87 1.67 2.20 1.20
Sum 28.00 25.00 33.00 18.00
Count 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P- F
value crit
Between Groups 7.87 3.00 2.62 1.94 0.13 2.77
98 | P a g e
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.94 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.77 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that Customers visits to hotels for food have gone down in
Covid 19 Pandemic period.
Figure 5.35 Visits to hotels for food have gone down in Covid 19 Pandemic
period
160.00
146.84
140.00
120.00 110.00
100.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
3.22 1.00 3.221.33 2.41 0.12 3.93
0.00 MS 3.22 P-value 0.12
SSdf 1.33 F F crit
Between Groups3.221.00 2.41 3.93
Within Groups146.84110.00
99 | P a g e
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 2.41 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.93 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
assumed that Customers visits to hotels for food have gone down in Covid
19 Pandemic period.
Figure 5.36 Prices of hotel rooms have gone down in Covid 19 Pandemic
period (Citywise)
120.00 114.13
100.00
80.00
60.00 56.00
40.00
20.00
2.85 3.00 0.952.04 0.47 0.71 2.77
0.00
SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 2.85 3.00 0.95 0.47 0.71 2.77
Within Groups 114.13 56.00 2.04
100 | P a g
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.47 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.77 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that Prices of hotel rooms have gone down in Covid 19
Pandemic period.
Figure 5.37 Prices of hotel rooms have gone down in Covid 19 Pandemic
period (Genderwise)
1.81
Variance
1.73
2.06
Average
2.22
103.00
Sum 111.00
50.00
Count 50.00
FemaleMale
ANOVA
Source of SS df MS F P- F crit
Variation value
Between Groups 0.64 1.00 0.64 0.36 0.55 3.94
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
101 | P a g
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.36 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.94 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that Prices of hotel rooms have gone down in Covid 19
Pandemic period.
Figure 5.38 Profit of Hotel industry has gone up in the post GST era
(Citywise)
70.00
65.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
74.00
70.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
25.00 25.00
10.00
2.60
25.0073.00 2.922.802.96 1.581.251.12 1.17
0.00
Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 25.00 73.00 2.92 1.58
Thane 25.00 70.00 2.80 1.25
Kalyan 25.00 65.00 2.60 1.17
Other cities 25.00 74.00 2.96 1.12
MumbaiThaneKalyanOther cities
102 | P a g
ANOVA
Source of SS df MS F P- F crit
Variation value
Between Groups 1.96 3.00 0.65 0.51 0.68 2.70
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.51 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.70 and P-value is also more than 0.05 I.E 0.51.
Researcher concluded that profit of hotel industry has gone up in the post
GST era.
Table No. 5.71 Descriptive Statistics of Profit of Hotel industry has gone
up in the post GST era (Citywise)
Male Female
MaleFemale
103 | P a g
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value 0.71 is less than Z
critical value 1.96. Researcher concluded that profit of hotel industry has
gone up in the post GST era.
Prices of food have gone up due to Goods and Service Tax
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 25.00 51.00 2.04 1.29
Thane 25.00 64.00 2.56 1.67
Kalyan 25.00 58.00 2.32 1.64
Other Cities 25.00 68.00 2.72 1.21
Figure 5.40 Prices of food have gone up due to Goods and Service Tax
(Citywise)
1
39.6 9 6.0 1.51 0.2 2.7
50%
0 0 2 0
40%
30% 2.2
20% 0
10%
0%
6.59
3.00
SS df MS F P-value F crit
Within Groups 139.60 96.00 1.45
Between Groups 6.59 3.00 2.20 1.51 0.22 2.70
Between GroupsWithin Groups
104 | P a g
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.51 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.70 and P-value is also more than 0.05 i.e 0.22.
Researcher concluded that Prices of food have gone up due to Goods and
Service Tax.
60.00 50.00
50.00 50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00 2.38
1.42
10.00 2.44 0.00 0.250.40 1.64 0.811.96
1.56
0.00 Hypo Obse thesi z Criticz Critic
al one-altail
two- tail
Kno P(Z< P(Z<
1.96
wn =z) one- tail =z) two- tail
Mean Varia rvatized z
0.40
ons Mean
nce
Di…
Male2.44 1.56 50.00 0.00 0.25 1.64 0.81
Female 2.38 1.42 50.00
MaleFemale
105 | P a g
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value 1.64 is less than Z
critical value 1.96. Researcher concluded that Prices of food have gone up
due to Goods and Service Tax.
Figure 5.42 Quality of food served in the hotels has declined due to Goods
and Service Tax (Citywise)
Mumbai
3.36 1.07
25.00
84.00
CountSumAverageVariance
Thane
2.44 1.17
25.00
61.00
CountSumAverageVariance
106 | P a g
Kalyan
2.72 1.46
25.00
68.00
CountSumAverageVariance
Other cities
3.12 1.19
25.00
78.00
CountSumAverageVariance
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P- F
value crit
Between Groups 12.59 3.00 4.20 3.43 0.02 2.70
107 | P a g
Table No. 5.73 Descriptive Statistics of Quality of food served in the hotels
has declined due to Goods and Service Tax
Male Female
108 | P a g
Figure 5.43 Quality of services provided in the hotels have dropped due to
Goods and Service Tax (Citywise)
MumbaiThaneKalyanOthers
ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between
Groups 8.04 3 2.68 2.45 0.07 2.70
109 | P a g
Figure 5.44 Quality of services provided in the hotels have dropped due to
Goods and Service Tax (Genderwise)
159.00
131.00
50.00
3.182.623.182.62 1.051.101.051.10
50.00 159.00
ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 7.84 1.00 7.84 7.31 0.01 3.94
110 | P a g
Figure No. 5.45 Prices of hotel rooms have gone up after implementation
of Goods and Service Tax (Citywise)
MumbaiThaneKalyanOther cities
ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between
Groups 3.47 3.00 1.16 1.30 0.28 2.70
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.30 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.70 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that Prices of hotel rooms have gone up after implementation of
Goods and Service Tax.
Figure No. 5.46 Prices of hotel rooms have gone up after implementation
of Goods and Service Tax (Genderwise)
100% 0.80
2.34 50.00
0%
Mean Known VarianceObservations
MaleFemale
111 | P a g
Table no. 5.74 Descriptive Statistics of prices of hotel rooms have gone up
after implementation of Goods and Service Tax (Genderwise)
Benefit of Goods and Service Tax (Input Tax Credit) hotel owner are passing
to customers
112 | P a g
Figure No. 5.47 Benefit of Goods and Service Tax (Input Tax Credit) hotel
owner are passing to customers (Citywise)
100%
90%
1.30
80%
70%
60%
124.96 96.00
50% 2.57 0.06 2.70
40%
30% 3.35
20%
10%
0%
10.04 3.00
SSdfMSFP-valueF crit
Male Female
Mean 2.76 Mean 2.64
Standard Error 0.18 Standard Error 0.15
Median 2.50 Median 3.00
Standard Deviation 1.29 Standard Deviation 1.05
Sample Variance 1.66 Sample Variance 1.09
Sum 138.00 Sum 132.00
Count 50.00 Count 50.00
Largest(1) 5.00 Largest(1) 5.00
Smallest(1) 1.00 Smallest(1) 1.00
Confidence Level(95.0%) 0.37 Confidence Level(95.0%) 0.30
113 | P a g
Figure No. 5.48 Benefit of Goods and Service Tax (Input Tax Credit) hotel
owner are passing to customers (Genderwise)
100%
90%
80%
1.09
2.64 50.00
70%
60%
50%
0.510.301.640.611.96
40%
30% 1.66
2.76 50.00
20%
10%
0%
0.00
MaleFemale
ANOVA
P-
Source of Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 8.03 3.00 2.68 2.06 0.11 2.70
114 | P a g
Figure No.5.49 Visits to hotels for food have gone down after
implementation of Goods and Services Tax (Citywise)
100%
25.00 79.00 3.16 1.31
80%
25.00 1.09
64.00 2.56
60%
25.00 1.25
40% 60.00 2.40
0%
Count Sum Average Variance
MumbaiThaneKalyanOther Cities
Table no. 5.76 Descriptive Statistics of Visits to hotels for food have gone
down after implementation of Goods and Services Tax
Male Female
115 | P a g
Figure No.5.50 Visits to hotels for food have gone down after
implementation of Goods and Services Tax (Genderwise)
50.00 50.00
1.52 1.17
2.78 2.64
0%20%40%60%80%100%
MaleFemale
In Post GST era, Customers orders for foods from hotels have reduced due to
Goods and Service Tax.
116 | P a g
Figure No.5.51 In Post GST era, Customers orders for foods from hotels
have reduced due to Goods and Service Tax(Citywise)
100.00 96.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
0.00 1.06
5.24 3.00 1.75 1.65 0.18 2.70
SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 5.24 3.00 1.75 1.65 0.18 2.70
Within Groups 101.92 96.00 1.06
Table no. 5.77 Descriptive Statistics of in Post GST era, Customers orders
for foods from hotels have reduced due to Goods and Service Tax.
Male Female
Mean 2.78 Mean 2.78
Standard Error 0.16 Standard Error 0.13
Median 3.00 Median 3.00
Standard Deviation 1.13 Standard Deviation 0.95
Sample Variance 1.28 Sample Variance 0.91
Count 50.00 Count 50.00
Largest(1) 5.00 Largest(1) 5.00
Smallest(1) 1.00 Smallest(1) 1.00
Confidence Level(95.0%) 0.32 Confidence Level(95.0%) 0.27
117 | P a g
Figure No.5.52 In Post GST era, Customers orders for foods from hotels
have reduced due to Goods and Service Tax (Genderwise)
100%
80% 2.78 0.9550.00
60% 0.501.641.001.96
40%
2.78 1.13 50.00
20%
0% 0.000.00
z-Test: Two Sample for Means Male z-Test: Two Sample for Means Female
120.00
100.00 1.23
0.92
0.91 2.68 1.13 2.44
2.28
80.00 2.08
60.00
40.00
20.00 52.00 57.00 61.00
67.00
0.00
25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
CountSumAverageVariance
118 | P a g
ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 4.83 3.00 1.61 1.54 0.21 2.70
100%
2.440.9350.00
50% 0.191.640.371.96
2.261.1050.00
0% 0.00
-50% -0.89
-100%
MaleFemale
119 | P a g
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value is (0.89) less than Z
critical value 1.96. Researcher assumed that Cost of accommodation of
hotels rooms has increased due to GST, hence rent of hotels has gone up.
Figure No.5.55 GST rates on sale of food in hotels and rent on hotel
rooms must be reduced (Citywise)
MumbaiThaneKalyanOther cities
ANOVA
P-
Source of Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 5.79 3.00 1.93 1.67 0.18 2.70
120 | P a g
Table No. 5.79 Descriptive Statistics of Goods and service Tax rates on
sale of food and rent on hotel rooms must be reduced
Male Female
Figure No.5.56 GST rates on sale of food in hotels and rent on hotel rooms
must be reduced (Genderwise)
MaleFemale
121 | P a g
Table No. 5.80 Descriptive Statistics Mumbai Hotel industry has affected
badly in Covid 19 Pandemic
ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 7.15 3.00 2.38 1.66 0.18 2.70
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.66 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.70 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
construed that Mumbai Hotel industry has affected badly in Covid 19
Pandemic.
100%
80% 1.14
2.66 50.00
60%
40%
2.36 1.27 50.00
20%
0%
MaleFemale
122 | P a g
Table No.5.81 Descriptive Statistics Mumbai Hotel industry has affected
badly in Covid 19 Pandemic (Genderwise)
Visits to hotels for food have gone down in Covid 19 Pandemic period
Anova: Single Factor
SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 25.00 56.00 2.24 1.52
Thane 25.00 57.00 2.28 1.38
Kalyan 25.00 61.00 2.44 1.26
Other Cities 25.00 73.00 2.92 1.33
Figure No.5.58 Visits to hotels for food have gone down in Covid 19
Pandemic period (Citywise)
100%
80% 1.37
123 | P a g
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.78 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.70 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
assumed that visits to hotels for food have gone down in Covid 19
Pandemic period.
Figure No.5.59 Visits to hotels for food have gone down in Covid 19
Pandemic period (Genderwise)
MaleFemale
Table No.5.82 Descriptive Statistics Visits to hotels for food have gone
down in Covid 19 Pandemic period (Genderwise)
124 | P a g
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value is 0.08 less than Z
critical value 1.96. Researcher assumed that visits to hotels for food have
gone down in Covid 19 Pandemic period.
100%
25.00 76.00 3.04 1.21
80%
60% 25.00 67.00 2.68 1.56
40%
20% 25.00 69.00 2.76 1.86
0%
25.00 71.00 2.84 1.14
MumbaiThaneKalyanOther cities
ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between
Groups 1.79 3.00 0.60 0.41 0.74 2.70
125 | P a g
Figure No.5.61 Prices of hotel rooms have gone down in Covid 19
Pandemic Period (Genderwise)
100%
80% 2.68
1.65 50.00
60%
40%
2.98 50.00
1.16
20%
0%
Mean Known Variance Observations
MaleFemale
Table No.5.83 Descriptive Statistics Prices of hotel rooms have gone down
in Covid 19 Pandemic Period (Genderwise)
126 | P a g
Figure No.5.62 On vacation hotel rooms are booked with or without GST
to reduce rent of rooms
Without GST 42
With GST 58
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
127 | P a g
Questionnaire relating to Hotels (Managers and Employees)
Primary data was collected from 200 respondents (Hotel Managers and
Employees) from different cities such as Mumbai, Thane, Kalyan and
Other cities.
200
150
Numb
100 200
149
50
51
0
Hotel Yes No
ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 0.65 2.00 0.32 1.70 0.19 3.04
128 | P a g
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.70 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.04 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
assumed that hotel are registered under GST Act.
100%
40.00 56.00 1.40 0.25
80%
51.00 63.00
1.24
60% 0.18
50.00 59.00
40% 1.18 0.15
0%
Count Sum Average Variance
MumbaiThaneKalyanOther cities
ANOVA
P-
Source of Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 1.16 3.00 0.39 2.06 0.11 2.65
200
200 85 64 51
Numb
0
Hotels Regular Composition Not applied
129 | P a g
Conclusion: Researcher concluded that 85 hotels have applied for Regular
Scheme, 64 hotels have applied for Composition scheme and 51 hotels
have not applied for GST any scheme.
Don't Know 57
Composition 60
Regular 83
Hotels 200
200
150
200
Responde
100 143
50
57
0
Hotels Yes No
130 | P a g
Table no. 5.85 Descriptive statistics of hotels are filing GST returns
(Starwise)
ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 0.57 2.00 0.29 1.41 0.25 3.04
Table no. 5.86 Descriptive statistics of hotels are filing GST returns
(Citywise)
ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 0.90 3.00 0.30 1.47 0.22 2.65
131 | P a g
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =1.47 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.65 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that hotels are filing GST returns.
Table no. 5.87 Descriptive statistics of tax rates were normal before GST
era (Starwise)
SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
1 Star 63.00 147.00 2.33 0.71
2 Star 63.00 156.00 2.48 0.90
3 Star 63.00 155.00 2.46 0.61
ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 0.77 2.00 0.39 0.52 0.59 3.04
132 | P a g
Conclusion: Alternative hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =2.70 is
more than F critical value i.e 2.66. Researcher concluded that tax rates
were not normal before GST era.
Table no. 5.89 Descriptive statistics of tax rates were normal after GST
era (Starwise)
Table no. 5.90 Descriptive statistics of tax rates were normal after GST
era (Citywise)
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 40.00 118.00 2.95 0.72
Thane 40.00 126.00 3.15 0.90
Kalyan 40.00 102.00 2.55 0.97
Other Cities 40.00 105.00 2.63 0.80
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 9.47 3.00 3.16 3.72 0.01 2.66
133 | P a g
Table no. 5.91 Descriptive statistics of whether hotel business has
increased after GST implementation (Starwise)
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
1 Star 63.00 156.00 2.48 0.96
2 Star 63.00 170.00 2.70 1.05
3 Star 63.00 154.00 2.44 0.80
P-
Source of Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 2.41 2.00 1.21 1.29 0.28 3.04
134 | P a g
Table no. 5.93 Descriptive statistics of whether hotel room booking has
increased after GST implementation (Starwise)
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
1 Star 63.00 153.00 2.43 1.02
2 Star 63.00 146.00 2.32 0.74
3 Star 63.00 144.00 2.29 1.11
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 0.71 2.00 0.35 0.37 0.69 3.04
Table no. 5.94 Descriptive statistics of whether hotel room booking has
increased after GST implementation (Citywise)
135 | P a g
Table no. 5.95 Descriptive statistics of whether room rates have increased
after GST implementation (Starwise)
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
1 Star 63.00 134.00 2.13 0.95
2 Star 63.00 150.00 2.38 0.95
3 Star 63.00 145.00 2.30 0.63
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 2.13 2.00 1.06 1.26 0.29 3.04
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.
H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =1.26 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.04 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that room rates have increased after GST implementation.
Table no. 5.96 Descriptive statistics of whether room rates have increased
after GST implementation (Citywise)
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 40.00 95.00 2.38 0.80
Thane 40.00 100.00 2.50 1.28
Kalyan 40.00 81.00 2.03 0.74
Other cities 40.00 76.00 1.90 0.55
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 9.65 3.00 3.22 3.80 0.01 2.66
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Alternative hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =3.80 is more
than F critical value i.e 2.66 and P value is also less than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that room rates have increased after GST implementation.
Table no. 5.97 Descriptive statistics of whether cost of food has enhanced
after GST implementation (Starwise)
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
1 Star 63.00 147.00 2.33 1.06
2 Star 63.00 156.00 2.48 0.90
3 Star 63.00 143.00 2.27 0.85
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 1.41 2.00 0.70 0.75 0.47 3.04
136 | P a g
H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =0.75 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.04 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
assumed that cost of food has enhanced after GST implementation.
Table no. 5.98 Descriptive statistics of whether cost of food has enhanced
after GST implementation (Citywise)
137 | P a g
Table no. 5.100 Descriptive statistics of whether complains were received
regarding food quality before GST era (Citywise)
138 | P a g
Table no. 5.102 Descriptive statistics of whether complains were received
regarding food quality after GST era (Citywise)
139 | P a g
Table no. 5.104 Descriptive statistics of whether complains regarding
rooms services have increased after GST era (Citywise)
140 | P a g
Table no. 5.106 Descriptive statistics of Mumbai Hotel industry has
affected badly in Covid 19 Pandemic (Citywise)
Table no. 5.107 Descriptive statistics of prices of hotel rooms have gone
down in Covid 19 Pandemic period (Starwise)
141 | P a g
Table no. 5.108 Descriptive statistics of prices of hotel rooms have gone
down in Covid 19 Pandemic period (Citywise)
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 40.00 95.00 2.38 0.55
Thane 40.00 89.00 2.23 0.59
Kalyan 40.00 71.00 1.78 0.49
Other cities 40.00 83.00 2.08 0.48
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 7.88 3.00 2.63 4.99 0.00 2.66
Table no. 5.109 Descriptive statistics of Goods and Service Tax rates on
sale of food in hotels and rent on hotel rooms must be reduced
(Starwise)
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
1 Star 63.00 121.00 1.92 0.40
2 Star 63.00 132.00 2.10 0.47
3 Star 63.00 130.00 2.06 0.48
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 1.09 2.00 0.54 1.21 0.30 3.04
142 | P a g
Table no. 5.110 Descriptive statistics of Goods and Service Tax rates on
sale of food in hotels and rent on hotel rooms must be reduced (Citywise)
143 | P a g
Table no. 5.112 Descriptive statistics of whether cost of foods has
enhanced after GST implementation (Citywise)
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 40.00 98.00 2.45 0.51
Thane 40.00 86.00 2.15 0.75
Kalyan 40.00 70.00 1.75 0.50
Other Cities 40.00 83.00 2.08 0.64
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 9.92 3.00 3.31 5.53 0.00 2.66
144 | P a g
Table no. 5.114 Descriptive statistics of Hotel Industry business has
affected due to GST implementation (Starwise)
145 | P a g