Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 145

CHAPTER- V

IMPACT OF GST ON HOTEL INDUSTRY IN MUMBAI


REGION

Research scholar has analysed data of research topic through primary and
secondary data. Secondary data was gathered from BSE website
(https://www.bseindia.com/sensex/code/35/) of 45 Hotels listed on Bombay
Stock Exchange. Data provides information regarding Revenue, Total Income,
Profit before Tax, Net Profit and Earning Per Share (EPS) of different hotel of
BSE.
Table 5.1
Income Statement Advani Hotels & Resorts (India) Ltd.
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 27.47 70.13 70.28 62.48 59.64


Other Income 0.71 1.03 1.45 1.35 1.2
Total Income 28.18 71.16 71.73 63.82 60.84
Expenditure -30.36 -53.36 -54.15 -47.4 -42.79
Interest -0.2 -0.23 -0.06 -0.06 -0.32
PBDT -2.18 17.8 17.58 16.43 18.05
Depreciation -3.27 -3.74 -3.65 -3.52 -3.69
PBT -5.45 14.05 13.93 12.91 14.36
Tax 1.37 -2.79 -2.55 -4.27 -5.57
Net Profit -4.08 11.26 11.37 8.63 8.79
Equity 9.24 9.24 9.24 9.24 9.24
EPS -0.88 2.44 2.46 1.87 1.9
CEPS -0.18 3.25 3.25 2.63 2.7
OPM % -7.24 25.7 25.11 26.39 30.8
NPM % -14.86 16.06 16.18 13.82 14.73
It was concluded that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.59.64 crores, which was increased to Rs. 70.13
crores in 2020 and again it reduced to Rs.27.47 crores in 2021 due to covid -19
pandemic.

1|Page
2. Total Income was 60.84 crores in 2017, which was increased to 71.16
crores in 2020 and again it went down to Rs. 28.18 crores in 2021 due to
covid-19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.14.36 crores in 2017, which was Rs.14.05 in 2020 and again it
reduced to Rs. (5.45) in 2021 due to covid-19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.8.79 crores in 2017, which was increased to Rs. 11.26
in 2020 and again it went down to Rs.(4.08) crores in 2021 due to covid-19
pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.1.9 in 2017, which was enhanced to Rs.2.44 in 2020 and
again it reduced to Rs. (0.88) in 2021.
6. GST has not greatly affected Revenue, Total Income, PBT, Net Profit and
EPS of hotel industry from 2017 to 2020 but it was affected badly in 2021 due
to covid 19 pandemic.

Table 5.2
Income Statement Asian Hotels (East) Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 29.41 92.1 103.44 102.14 98.32


Other Income 9.35 8.98 10.27 5.61 8.79
Total Income 38.75 101.08 113.71 107.75 107.11
Expenditure -35.17 -75.97 -84.35 -83.57 -83.84
Interest -- -- -- -- -0.5
PBDT 3.58 25.11 29.36 24.18 23.27
Depreciation -3.09 -2.97 -4.92 -5.44 -6.38
PBT 0.49 22.14 24.44 18.74 16.89
Tax 0.2 -8.27 -6.66 -4 -3.93
Net Profit 0.69 13.87 17.78 14.74 12.96
Equity 11.53 11.53 11.53 11.53 11.53
EPS 0.6 12.03 15.42 12.79 11.28
CEPS 3.28 14.61 19.7 17.5 16.77
OPM % 12.17 27.27 28.38 23.67 24.17
NPM % 2.35 15.06 17.19 14.43 13.1

2|Page
It was assumed that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.98.32 crores, which was increased to Rs. 103.44
crores in 2019 and again it reduced to Rs.29.41 crores in 2021 due to covid -19
pandemic.
2. Total Income was 107.11 crores in 2017, which was increased to 113.71
crores in 2019 and again it went down to Rs. 38.75 crores in 2021 due to
covid-19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.16.89 crores in 2017, which went up to Rs.22.14 in 2020 and
again it reduced to Rs. 0.49 in 2021 due to covid-19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.12.96 crores in 2017, which was increased to Rs. 17.78 in
2019 and again it went down to Rs.0.69 crores in 2021 due to covid-19
pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.11.28 in 2017, which was enhanced to Rs.11.52 in 2019 and
again it reduced to Rs. 0.6 in 2021.
6. GST has not greatly affected Revenue, Total Income, PBT, Net Profit and
EPS of hotel industry from 2017 to 2020 but it was affected badly in 2021 due
to covid 19 pandemic.

Table 5.3
Income Statement Aruna Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Revenue 0.31 -- -- -- --
Other Income 0.02 0.11 0.83 1.15 1.81
Total Income 0.33 0.11 0.83 1.15 1.81
Expenditure -8.29 -5.77 -8.32 -2.95 -5.53
Interest -5.2 -4.03 -4.44 -0.29 -0.06
PBDT -7.96 -5.67 -7.5 -1.81 -3.72
Depreciation -0.79 -0.8 -0.8 -1.44 -1.45
PBT -8.74 -6.46 -8.3 -3.25 -5.17
Tax -1.34 -1.42 -9.85 -- --
Net Profit -10.08 -7.89 -18.15 -3.25 -5.17
Equity 9 9 9 9 9
EPS -11.2 -8.76 -20.16 -3.61 -5.75
CEPS -10.33 -7.88 -19.27 -2.01 -4.13
OPM % -894.16 -- -- -- --
NPM % 3272.73 -- -- -- --

3|Page
It was presumed that:
1. Total Income was 1.81 crores in 2017, which was reduced to 0.11 crores
in 2020 due to GST and again it went up to Rs.0.33. crores in 2021.
2. PBT was Rs.(5.17) crores in 2017, which went down to Rs.(6.46) in 2020
due to GST and again it reduced to Rs. (8.74) in 2021 due to covid-19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.(5.17) crores in 2017, which was reduced to Rs. (10.08) in
2021 due to GST and covid-19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.(5.75) in 2017, which was reuced to Rs.(11.2) in 2021 due to
GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
Table 5.4
Income Statement Asian Hotels (North) Limited

(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 72.58 252.39 273.52 274.44 251.19


Other Income 1.87 14.56 8.16 31.11 9.76
Total Income 74.45 266.95 281.68 305.55 260.95
Expenditure -752.76 -322.97 -304.5 -288.34 -267.14
Interest -91.05 -111.75 -102.87 -98.32 --
PBDT -678.31 -56.02 -22.82 17.21 -6.18
Depreciation -16.82 -17.93 -19.26 -19.96 -21.22
PBT -695.13 -73.95 -42.08 -2.75 -27.4
Tax -0.01 10.82 9.3 0.33 11.79
Net Profit -695.14 -63.13 -32.78 -2.42 -15.61
Equity 19.45 19.45 19.45 19.45 --
EPS -357.34 -32.45 -16.85 -1.24 -8.03
CEPS -348.69 -23.24 -6.95 9.02 --
OPM % -809.08 22.08 29.27 42.1 -2.46
NPM % -957.71 -25.01 -11.98 -0.88 -6.2

It was construed that:


1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.251.19 crores, which was increased to Rs. 252.39
crores in 2020 and again it reduced to Rs.72.58 crores in 2021 due to covid -19
pandemic.

4|Page
2. Total Income was 260.95 crores in 2017, which was increased to
266.95 crores in 2020 and again it went down to Rs. 74.45 crores in 2021
due to covid-19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.(27.40) crores in 2017, which was reduced to Rs. (695.13)
in 2021 due to GST and covid-19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.(15.61) crores in 2017, which reduced to (695.13) crores
in 2021 due to GST and covid-19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.(8.03) in 2017, which reduced to Rs.(357.34) in 2021 due to
GST and Covid-19.

Table 5.5
Income Statement Benares Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Revenue 24.24 63.64 59.68 47.43 49.57
Other Income 0.57 0.2 0.71 0.85 1.57
Total Income 24.81 63.84 60.39 48.28 51.14
Expenditure -24.84 -43.96 -42.98 -36.25 -35.75
Interest -1 -1.08 -0.76 -0.12 --
PBDT -0.03 19.88 17.41 12.02 15.38
Depreciation -6.94 -6.38 -5.23 -4.17 -4.65
PBT -6.97 13.5 12.18 7.85 10.73
Tax 1.74 -2.89 -3.45 -1.37 -3.92
Net Profit -5.23 10.61 8.72 6.48 6.82
Equity 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
EPS -40.22 81.63 67.1 49.87 52.44
CEPS 13.12 130.72 107.32 81.97 88.2
OPM % 3.97 32.93 30.44 25.61 31.03
NPM % -21.57 16.68 14.62 13.67 13.7
It was inferred that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.49.57 crores, which was increased to Rs. 63.64
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.24.24 crores in 2021 due
to covid -19 pandemic.
2. Total Income was 51.14 crores in 2017, which was increased to 63.84
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it went down to Rs. 24.81 crores in 2021
due to covid-19 pandemic.

5|Page
3. PBT was Rs.10.73crores in 2017, which was increased to 13.50 crores in
2020 due to GST and it again it reduced to (6.97) due covid-19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.6.82 crores in 2017, which has increased to 10.61
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.(5.23) covid-19
pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.52.44 in 2017, which was increased to Rs.81.63 in 2020 due
to GST and again it was reduced to (40.22) due to Covid-19.

Table 5.6
Income Statement Best Eastern Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)

Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 2.34 4.3 5.18 4.79 4.77


Other Income 0 0 0.02 0.05 0.16
Total Income 2.34 4.3 5.2 4.84 4.93
Expenditure -2.31 -3.99 -4.12 -3.95 -4.00
Interest -0.17 -0.15 -0.17 -0.26 -0.31
PBDT 0.03 0.31 1.08 0.89 0.93
Depreciation -0.65 -0.7 -0.69 -0.7 -0.71
PBT -0.62 -0.4 0.39 0.2 0.22
Tax 0.05 0.05 -0.11 0.06 -0.08
Net Profit -0.57 -0.35 0.28 0.25 0.15
Equity 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69
EPS -0.34 -0.21 0.17 0.15 0.09
CEPS 0.05 0.21 0.58 0.56 0.51
OPM % 8.67 10.62 24.2 23.95 26.06
NPM % -24.48 -8.17 5.4 5.29 3.1

It was concluded that:


1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.4.77 crores, which was increased to Rs. 4.3 crores
in 2020 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.2.34 crores in 2021 due to
covid
-19 pandemic.
2. Total Income was 4.93 crores in 2017, which was increased to 5.2 crores in
2019 due to GST and again it went down to Rs. 2.34 crores in 2021 due to
covid-19 pandemic.

6|Page
3. PBT was Rs.0.22 crores in 2017, which was increased to 0.39 crores in 2019
due to GST and it again it reduced to (0.62) due covid-19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.0.15 crores in 2017, which has increased to 0.28 crores in
2019 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.(0.57) covid-19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.0.09 in 2017, which was increased to Rs.0.17 in 2019 due to
GST and again it was reduced to (0.34) due to Covid-19.

Table 5.7
Income Statement Blue Coast Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)

Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue -- -- 52.75 134.89 132.6


6
Other Income 0.08 0.1 2.48 1.43 1.13
Total Income 0.08 0.1 55.22 136.32 133.7
9
Expenditure -14.25 -21.31 -245.85 -131.24 -133.8
Interest -4.15 -4.15 -153.71 -24.27 --
PBDT -14.17 -21.21 -190.63 5.09 -0.01
Depreciation -0.11 -0.11 -3.16 -6.74 -6.63
PBT -14.27 -21.32 -193.79 -1.66 -6.64
Tax -- 0 -0.58 -- 0.61
Net Profit -14.27 -21.32 -194.36 -1.66 -6.03
Equity 12.75 12.75 12.75 12.75 12.75
EPS -11.2 -16.72 -152.01 -1.31 -7.98
CEPS -11.11 -16.64 -149.98 3.99 0.47
OPM % -- -- -70 21.77 -0.01
NPM % -- -- -368.5 -1.23 -4.5

It was presumed that:


1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.132.66 crores, which was increased to Rs. 134.89
crores in 2018 and again it reduced to Rs.52.75 crores in 2019 due to GST.
2. Total Income was 133.79 crores in 2017, which was reduced to 55.22
crores in 2019 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs. ((0.08) crores in 2021.
3. PBT was Rs.(6.64) crores in 2017, which went down to (193.79) crores in
2019 due to GST and it again it went up to (14.27) .

7|Page
4. Net Profit was Rs.(6.03) crores in 2017, which has reduced to
(194.36) crores in 2019 due to GST and again it enhanced to Rs.(14.27) .
5. EPS was Rs.(7.98) in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.(152.01) in 2019
due to GST and again it went up to (11.20) due to Covid-19.

Table 5.8
Income Statement Country Club Hospitality & Holidays Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)

Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 46.5 127.72 214.68 236.8 260.39


Other Income 5.8 -- -- -- --
Total Income 52.3 127.72 214.68 236.8 260.39
Expenditure -74.63 -151.43 -213.17 -228.88 -248.16
Interest -26.35 -36.2 -37.53 -33.84 -35.58
PBDT -22.33 -23.71 1.52 7.92 12.23
Depreciation -15.9 -16.56 -16.95 -17.95 -19.24
PBT -38.23 -40.27 -15.43 -10.03 -7.01
Tax -3.23 -4.7 -6.49 -7.21 -7.9
Net Profit -41.46 -44.97 -21.92 -17.25 -14.91
Equity 32.69 32.69 32.69 32.69 32.69
EPS -2.54 -2.75 -1.34 -1.06 -0.91
CEPS -1.56 -1.74 -0.3 0.04 0.27
OPM % 8.65 9.78 18.19 17.63 18.36
NPM % -89.17 -35.21 -10.21 -7.28 -5.73

It was construed that:


1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.260.39 crores, which was reduced to Rs.
46.50 crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
2. Total Income was 260.39 crores in 2017, which was reduced to 52.30
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.(7.01) crores in 2017, which went down to (38.23) crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.(14.91) crores in 2017, which has reduced to
(41.46) crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic .
5. EPS was Rs.(0.91) in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.(1.56) in 2021 due to
GST and Covid-19.

8|Page
Table 5.9
Income Statement CHL Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)

Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017


Revenue 10.61 53.4 62.28 63.61 63.86
Other Income 6.2 7.34 8.47 0.73 0.94
Total Income 16.81 60.74 70.76 64.34 64.8
Expenditure -21.38 -53.25 -55.54 -48.88 -51.99
Interest -1.73 -2.68 -4.36 -3.58 -4.54
PBDT -4.57 7.48 15.21 15.46 12.82
Depreciation -2.39 -2.73 -2.28 -2.19 -2.23
PBT -6.96 4.75 12.93 13.27 10.59
Tax 0.53 -1.89 -3.12 -5.04 -3.68
Net Profit -6.43 2.87 9.81 8.23 6.91
Equity 10.96 10.96 10.96 10.96 10.96
EPS -1.09 0.52 1.8 1.5 1.26
CEPS -0.74 1.02 2.21 1.9 1.67
OPM % -26.77 19.04 31.43 29.93 27.17
NPM % -60.58 5.37 15.75 12.94 10

It was assumed that:


1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.63.86 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 10.61
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
2. Total Income was 64.80 crores in 2017, which was reduced to 16.81
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.10.59 crores in 2017, which went down to (6.96) crores in 2021
due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.6.91 crores in 2017, which has reduced to 6.43 crores in
2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.1.26 in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.(1.09) in 2021 due
to GST and Covid-19.

9|Page
Table 5.10
Income Statement Cindrella Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)

Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 2.48 4.79 4.78 4.62 4.18


Other Income 0.11 0.15 0.01 0.01 0
Total Income 2.6 4.94 4.79 4.63 4.18
Expenditure -2.57 -2.66 -3.86 - -3.33
3.74
Interest -0.08 -0.03 -0.03 - -0.03
0.04
PBDT 0.03 2.28 0.93 0.89 0.86
Depreciation -0.85 -0.66 -0.53 - -0.52
0.53
PBT -0.82 1.62 0.39 0.36 0.33
Tax 0.03 -0.11 -0.11 - -0.1
0.09
Net Profit -0.8 1.51 0.28 0.27 0.23
Equity -- -- -- -- 3.57
EPS -2.23 4.24 0.78 0.77 0.64
CEPS -- -- -- -- 2.12
OPM % 4.47 48.29 19.94 20 21.21
NPM % -32.07 31.54 5.84 5.93 5

It was construed that:


1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.4.18 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 2.48 crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
2. Total Income was 4.18 crores in 2017, which was reduced to 2.60 crores in
2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.0.33 crores in 2017, which went down to (0.82) crores in 2021
due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.

10 | P a g e
4. Net Profit was Rs.0.23 crores in 2017, which has reduced to (0.8) crores in
2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.0.64 in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.(2.23) in 2021 due to
GST and Covid-19.
Table 5.11
Income Statement Dhanada Corporation Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)

Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 2.94 9.28 11.22 10.93 8.83


Other Income 0.08 0.09 0.16 0.08 0.26
Total Income 3.02 9.36 11.37 11.01 9.09
Expenditure -8.23 -11.93 -12.05 -12.8 -10.9
Interest -4.1 -3.54 -3.04 -2.62 -2.14
PBDT -5.21 -2.57 -0.67 -1.8 -1.81
Depreciation -0.7 -0.76 -0.98 -1.2 -1.73
PBT -5.91 -3.33 -1.65 -2.99 -3.54
Tax -- -- -- -- --
Net Profit -5.91 -3.33 -1.65 -2.99 -3.54
Equity 5.59 5.59 5.59 5.59 5.59
EPS -1.06 -0.59 -0.3 -0.54 -0.63
CEPS -0.93 -0.46 -0.12 -0.32 -0.32
OPM % -37.65 10.49 21.1 7.53 3.76
NPM % -201.4 -35.87 -14.74 -27.39 -40.15

It was inferred that:


1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.8.83 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 2.94 crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
2. Total Income was 9.09 crores in 2017, which was reduced to 3.02 crores in
2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.(3.54) crores in 2017, which went down to (5.91) crores in
2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.

11 | P a g e
4. Net Profit was Rs.(3.54) crores in 2017, which has reduced to (5.91)
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.(0.63) in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.(1.06) in 2021 due to
GST and Covid-19.
Table 5.12
Income Statement EIH Associated Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)

Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 101.39 249.08 264.18 263.57 263.56


Other Income 3.06 8.99 9.52 5.7 8.12
Total Income 104.45 258.07 273.7 269.27 271.68
Expenditure -124.63 -199.1 -201.09 -196.52 -192.55
Interest -0.53 -0.45 -0.43 -0.4 -1.93
PBDT -20.18 58.97 72.61 72.75 79.13
Depreciation -16.96 -15.97 -14.26 -14.09 -14.19
PBT -37.15 43 58.35 58.66 64.93
Tax 10.41 -5.04 -20.41 -20.87 -22.16
Net Profit -26.74 37.96 37.94 37.79 42.78
Equity 30.47 30.47 30.47 30.47 30.47
EPS -8.78 12.46 12.45 12.4 14.04
CEPS -3.21 17.7 17.13 17.03 18.7
OPM % -19.38 23.86 27.65 27.75 30.75
NPM % -26.37 15.24 14.36 14.34 1

It was assumed that:


1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.263.56 crores, which was reduced to Rs.
101.39 crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
2. Total Income was 271.68 crores in 2017, which was reduced to
104.45 crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.64.93 crores in 2017, which went down to (37.15) crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.

12 | P a g e
4. Net Profit was Rs.42.78 crores in 2017, which has reduced to (26.74)
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.14.04 in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.(8.78) in 2021 due
to GST and Covid-19.

Table 5.13
Income Statement EIH Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)

Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 432.7 1,350.30 1,543.24 1,350.28 1,277.55


Other Income 40.94 84.01 84.02 83.76 99.23
Total Income 473.64 1,434.31 1,627.26 1,434.04 1,376.78
Expenditure -796.73 -1,191.01 -1,340.55 -1,151.21 -1,138.44
Interest -40.43 -49.51 -46.36 -19.57 -14.5
PBDT -323.09 243.3 286.71 282.83 238.34
Depreciation -119.96 -134.2 -123.01 -108.97 -110.49
PBT -443.05 109.1 163.7 173.86 127.85
Tax 99.92 15.37 -50.37 -61.59 -31.32
Net Profit -343.13 124.47 113.33 112.27 96.53
Equity 125.07 114.31 114.31 114.31 114.31
EPS -5.72 2.18 1.98 1.96 1.69
CEPS -3.57 4.53 4.14 3.87 3.62
OPM % -65.32 21.68 21.58 22.4 19.79
NPM % -79.3 9.22 7.34 8.31 7

It was concluded that:


1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.1,277.55 crores, which was reduced to Rs.
432.70 crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
2. Total Income was 1,376.78 crores in 2017, which was reduced to
473.64 crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.127.85 crores in 2017, which went down to (443.05) crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.

13 | P a g e
4. Net Profit was Rs.96.53 crores in 2017, which has reduced to (343.13)
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.1.69 in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.(5.72) in 2021 due
to GST and Covid-19.

Table 5.14
Income Statement Graviss Hospitality Ltd

(Rs. In Crores)

Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 8.9 39.47 46.72 47.2 41.47


Other Income 1.33 0.69 0.83 0.24 0.76
Total Income 10.23 40.16 47.55 47.44 42.23
Expenditure -22.74 -45.39 -47.65 -42.44 -43.14
Interest -1.18 -1.63 -1.5 -1.61 -1.64
PBDT - -5.23 -0.1 5 -0.91
12.51
Depreciation -5.51 -6.09 -5.04 -5.73 -4.72
PBT -18.02 -11.32 -5.14 -0.73 -5.63
Tax 3.84 2.55 3.33 0.03 1.74
Net Profit -14.18 -8.77 -1.81 -0.7 -3.89
Equity 14.1 14.1 14.1 14.1 14.1
EPS -1.97 -1.28 -0.24 -0.15 0.55
CEPS -1.23 -0.38 0.46 0.71 0.12
OPM % -127.3 -9.12 3 14 1.76
NPM % -159.33 -22.22 -3.87 -1.48 -9.38

It was presumed that:


1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.41.47 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 8.9 crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
2. Total Income was 42.23 crores in 2017, which was reduced to 10.23 crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.

14 | P a g e
3. PBT was Rs.(5.63) crores in 2017, which went down to (18.02)) crores in
2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.(3.89) crores in 2017, which has reduced to (14.18) crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.0.55 in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.(1.97) in 2021 due to
GST and Covid-19.

Table 5.15
Income Statement Gujarat Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)

Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 0.99 3.75 3.7 3.31 3.25


Other Income 2.06 2.17 1.96 1.71 1.87
Total Income 3.06 5.92 5.66 5.02 5.12
Expenditure -0.31 -0.38 -0.43 -0.44 -0.35
Interest -- -- -- -- --
PBDT 2.74 5.54 5.23 4.58 4.77
Depreciation -0.05 -0.05 -0.05 -0.05 -0.05
PBT 2.7 5.49 5.18 4.53 4.73
Tax -0.43 -1.19 -1.1 -1.16 -0.86
Net Profit 2.27 4.3 4.08 3.37 3.87
Equity 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79
EPS 6 11.35 10.77 8.9 10.2
CEPS 6.12 11.47 10.89 9.02 10.33
OPM % 276.33 147.84 141.36 138.34 146.82
NPM % 228.8 114.71 110.27 101.78 118
It was construed that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.3.25 crores, which was increased to Rs. 3.75 crores
in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to 0.99 due to Covid 19
pandemic.

15 | P a g e
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.5.12 crores, which was increased to Rs. 5.92
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to 3.06 due to Covid 19
pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.4.73 crores, which was increased to Rs. 5.49 crores in
2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to 2.7 due to Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.3.87 crores, which was increased to Rs. 4.3 crores
in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to 2.27 due to Covid 19
pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.10.20 crores, which was increased to Rs. 11.35 crores
in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to 6.00 due to Covid 19
pandemic.

Table 5.16
Income Statement HLV Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)

Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 18.92 145.68 154.34 718.54 699.94


Other Income 25.22 6.51 4.18 24.58 13.85
Total Income 44.14 152.19 158.52 743.12 713.79
Expenditure -66.55 -160.45 -186.75 -640.92 -613.98
Interest -2.3 -0.91 -0.4 -83.67 -90.44
PBDT -22.41 -8.26 -28.23 102.2 99.81
Depreciation -13.52 -11.93 -9.57 -125.42 -202.32
PBT -35.93 -20.19 -37.8 -23.22 -102.51
Tax -- -- -- -- --
Net Profit -35.93 193.71 -118.9 -23.22 -102.51
Equity 126.11 126.11 126.11 126.11 93.32
EPS -0.57 -0.32 -0.6 -0.43 -2.2
CEPS -0.36 3.26 -1.73 1.62 2.14
OPM % -106.29 -5.05 -18.03 25.87 27.18
NPM % -189.9 132.97 -77.04 -3.23

16 | P a g e
It was concluded that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.699.94 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 18.92
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
2. Total Income was 713.79 crores in 2017, which was reduced to 44.14 crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.(102.51) crores in 2017, which went up to (35.93)) crores in
2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.(102.51) crores in 2017, which has increased to (35.93)
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.(2.20) in 2017, which was increased to Rs.(0.57) in 2021 due to
GST and Covid-19.
Table 5.17
Income Statement Hotel Rugby Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)

Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue -- -- -- -- --
Other Income 0.12 0.13 0.18 0.15 0.13
Total Income 0.12 0.13 0.18 0.15 0.13
Expenditure -0.17 -0.22 -3.11 -0.23 -0.17
Interest -- -- -- -- --
PBDT -0.05 -0.1 -2.93 -0.09 -0.04
Depreciation -- -- -- -- --
PBT -0.05 -0.1 -2.93 -0.09 -0.04
Tax -- -- -- -- --
Net Profit -0.05 -0.1 -2.93 -0.09 -0.04
Equity 14.32 14.32 14.32 14.32 14.32
EPS -0.04 -0.07 -2.04 -0.06 --
CEPS -0.04 -0.07 -2.04 -0.06 -0.03
OPM % -- -- -- -- --
NPM % -- -- -- --

17 | P a g e
It was interpreted that:
1. Total Income was 0.13 crores in 2017, which was reduced to 0.12 crores in
2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.(0.04) crores in 2017, which went up to (0.05)) crores in 2021
due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.(0.04) crores in 2017, which has increased to (0.05) crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.(0.06) in 2018, which was increased to Rs.(0.04) in 2021 due to
GST and Covid-19.

Table 5.18
Income Statement H.S.India Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)

Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017


Revenue 10.28 25.91 28.94 26.82 22.78
Other Income 0.22 0.41 0.61 0.62 0.6
Total Income 10.5 26.32 29.55 27.44 23.38
Expenditure -10.66 - - -23.57 -
23.37 25.32 19.19
Interest -1.73 -2.2 -2.05 -2.5 -2.91
PBDT -0.16 2.95 4.23 3.87 4.19
Depreciation -1.37 -1.6 -1.72 -2.11 -2.61
PBT -1.53 1.35 2.51 1.76 1.58
Tax 0.09 -0.09 -0.74 0.17 -0.55
Net Profit -1.44 1.26 1.77 1.93 1.04
Equity 16.24 16.24 16.24 16.24 16.24
EPS -0.78 0.76 1.08 1.19 0.64
CEPS -0.04 1.76 2.15 2.49 2.24
OPM % 15.26 19.86 21.67 23.73 31.17
NPM % -13.98 4.87 6.11 7.18 4.5

It was understood that:


1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.22.78 crores, which was increased to Rs. 25.91
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs.10.28 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.23.38 crores, which was increased to Rs. 26.32
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 10.50 due to Covid
19 pandemic.

18 | P a g e
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.1.58 crores, which was increased to Rs. 2.51 crores in
2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. (1.53) due to Covid 19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.1.04 crores, which was increased to Rs. 1.77
crores in 2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to (1.44) due to Covid 19
pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.0.64 crores, which was increased to Rs. 1.08 crores in
2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to (0.78) due to Covid 19 pandemic.

Table 5.19
Income Statement Howard Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)

Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 1.72 9.71 10.65 9.29 8.72


Other Income 0.01 0.14 0.13 0.23 0.2
Total Income 1.73 9.84 10.78 9.52 8.92
Expenditure -2.77 -9.75 - -9.13 -8.25
10.03
Interest -0.14 -0.19 -0.2 -0.17 -0.08
PBDT -1.04 0.1 0.76 0.39 0.66
Depreciation -0.6 -0.67 -0.77 -0.7 -0.7
PBT -1.64 -0.57 -0.01 -0.31 -0.04
Tax 0.13 -0.2 0.01 0.25 0.01
Net Profit -1.51 -0.77 0 -0.06 -0.03
Equity 9.11 9.11 9.11 -- --
EPS -1.66 -0.84 -- -0.28 -0.03
CEPS -1 -0.11 0.84 -- --
OPM % -52.94 2.97 8.97 6.1 8.49
NPM % -88.05 -7.88 -0.04 -0.65 -
It was concluded that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.8.72 crores, which was increased to Rs. 10.65
crores in 2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs.1.72 due to Covid 19
pandemic.

19 | P a g e
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.8.92 crores, which was increased to Rs. 10.78
crores in 2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 1.73 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.(.04) crores, which was increased to Rs. (0.01) crores
in 2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. (1.64) due to Covid 19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.(0.03) crores, which was reduced to Rs. (1.51)
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.(0.03) , which was reduced to RS.(1.66) due to GST
and Covid 19 pandemic.
Table 5.20
Income Statement Indian Hotels Co.Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)

Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 1,133.15 2,743.47 2,780.41 2,583.95 2,391.25


Other Income 110.52 134.41 90.5 55.39 53.86
Total Income 1,243.67 2,877.88 2,870.91 2,639.34 2,445.11
Expenditure - - - - -
1,680.14 2,236.36 2,284.27 2,203.77 2,034.97
Interest -294.79 -237.55 -158.64 -193.43 -197.86
PBDT -436.47 641.52 586.64 435.57 410.14
Depreciation -203.81 -203.78 -169.1 -151.34 -151.29
PBT -640.28 437.74 417.54 284.23 258.85
Tax 115.5 -36.33 -153.84 -136.46 -116.91
Net Profit -524.78 401.41 263.7 147.77 141.94
Equity 118.93 118.93 118.93 118.93 98.93
EPS -4.41 3.38 2.22 1.34 1.43
CEPS -2.7 5.09 3.64 2.52 2.96
OPM % -12.5 32.04 26.8 24.34 25.43
NPM % -46.31 14.63 9.48 5.72 5.94
It was presumed that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.2,391.25 crores, which was increased to Rs.
2,743.47 crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs.1,133.15
due to Covid 19 pandemic.

20 | P a g e
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.2,445.11 crores, which was increased to Rs.
2,877.88 crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 1,243.67
due to Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.258.85 crores, which was increased to Rs. 437.74
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. (640.28) due to
Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.141.94 crores, which was increased to Rs. 401.41
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.(524.78) Covid 19
pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.1.43 , which was increased to RS. 3.38 due to GST and
again it reduced to Rs.(4.41) Covid 19 pandemic.
Table 5.21
Income Statement India Tourism Development Corporation Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)

Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 175.76 336.27 349.96 343.87 473.15


Other Income 21.46 21.22 21.77 26.78 21.99
Total Income 197.22 357.49 371.73 370.64 495.14
Expenditure -214.32 -307.61 -302.38 -318.56 -468.56
Interest -1.22 -0.92 -0.53 -0.48 -0.2
PBDT -17.1 49.88 69.35 52.09 25.39
Depreciation -6.69 -7.2 -7.12 -7.15 -7.87
PBT -23.79 42.68 62.23 44.94 17.52
Tax -0.84 -16.56 -17.86 -8.75 -5.47
Net Profit -27.2 22.48 42.16 23.62 12.05
Equity 85.77 85.77 85.77 85.77 85.77
EPS -2.71 2.15 5.38 2.23 1.4
CEPS -2.39 3.46 5.75 3.59 2.32
OPM % -9.04 15.11 19.97 15.29 5.41
NPM % -15.48 6.68 12.05 6.87 2.5
It was assumed that:

21 | P a g e
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.473.15 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 336.27
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs.175.76 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.495.14 crores, which was reduced to Rs.
357.49 crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 197.22 due
to Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.17.52 crores, which was increased to Rs. 42.68 crores
in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. (23.79) due to Covid 19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.12.05 crores, which was increased to Rs. 22.48
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.(27.20) Covid 19
pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.1.40 , which was increased to Rs. 2.15 due to GST and
again it reduced to Rs.(2.71) Covid 19 pandemic.
Table 5.22 Income Statement Jindal Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)

Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 15.55 37.73 38.03 33.78 36.15


Other Income 0.12 0.19 0.15 1.03 0.22
Total Income 15.67 37.91 38.18 34.81 36.37
Expenditure -21.53 -31.7 -31 -27.74 -
28.94
Interest -4.78 -4.72 -4.75 -4.84 -5.99
PBDT -5.86 6.22 7.18 7.07 7.43
Depreciation -4.88 -5.16 -5.54 -6.76 -6.16
PBT -10.75 1.06 1.65 0.31 1.27
Tax -0.21 -0.38 -0.15 0.61 -1.02
Net Profit -10.96 0.68 1.5 0.92 0.25
Equity 6.65 6 -- -- 6
EPS -17.99 1.13 2.49 1.53 0.42
CEPS -9.13 9.73 -- -- 10.69
OPM % -6.98 28.97 31.38 35.25 37.14
NPM % -70.45 1.8 3.94 2.72 0.6

22 | P a g e
It was construed that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.36.15 crores, which was increased to Rs. 37.73
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs.15.55 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.36.37 crores, which was incresed to Rs. 37.91
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 15.67 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.1.27 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 1.06 crores in
2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. (10.75) due to Covid 19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.0.25 crores, which was increased to Rs. 0.68
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.(10.96) Covid 19
pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.0.42, which was increased to Rs. 1.13 due to GST and
again it reduced to Rs.(17.99) Covid 19 pandemic.
Table 5.23 Income Statement Kamat Hotels (India) Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)

Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 51.62 179.31 192.39 168.52 156.67


Other Income 1.01 0.9 1.8 6.76 7.86
Total Income 52.63 180.21 194.19 175.29 164.53
Expenditure -79.77 -133.75 -147.41 -112.46 -111.4
Interest -38.91 -34.36 -22.03 -14.8 -26.48
PBDT -27.14 46.45 46.78 62.83 53.13
Depreciation -10.01 -10.52 -10.96 -11.74 -12.56
PBT -37.15 35.94 35.82 51.09 40.58
Tax 9.58 -0.24 -10.75 -13.19 --
Net Profit -27.57 35.7 25.07 37.89 40.58
Equity 24.17 24.17 24.17 24.17 --
EPS -11.69 15.14 10.63 16.07 17.21
CEPS -7.27 19.12 14.9 20.53 --
OPM % 22.8 45.07 35.77 46.06 50.81
NPM % -53.41 19.91 13.03 22.48

23 | P a g e
It was inferred that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.156.67 crores, which was increased to Rs. 179.31
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs.51.62 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.164.53 crores, which was increased to Rs.
180.21 crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 52.63 due to
Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.40.58 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 35.94 crores in
2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. (37.15) due to Covid 19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.40.58 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 35.70
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.(27.57) Covid 19
pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.17.21, which was reduced to Rs. 15.14 due to GST and
again it reduced to Rs.(11.69) Covid 19 pandemic.
Table 5.24
Income Statement Kaushalya Infrastructure Development Corporation
Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)

Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 2.27 0.18 0.23 0.13 0.57


Other Income 5.26 0.82 26.03 0.04 0.23
Total Income 7.54 1 26.25 0.17 0.79
Expenditure -3.44 -6.38 -9.3 -0.86 -4.43
Interest -0.76 -0.7 -0.58 -0.16 0.4
PBDT 4.1 -5.38 16.96 -0.69 -3.63
Depreciation -0.38 -0.42 -0.44 -0.43 -0.43
PBT 3.71 -5.8 16.52 -1.12 -4.07
Tax -3.71 0.33 6.01 0.13 0.06
Net Profit 0 -5.47 22.53 -0.99 -4.01
Equity 34.63 34.63 34.63 34.63 34.63
EPS -- -1.58 6.5 -0.28 -1.16
CEPS 0.11 -1.46 6.63 -0.16 -1.03
OPM % 213.55 -2588.95 7793.33 -411.54 -711.46
NPM % 0.13 -3022.1 10011.56 -757.69 -7

24 | P a g e
It was assumed that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.0.57 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 0.18 crores
in 2020 due to GST and again it was increased to Rs.2.27 in Covid 19
pandemic.
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.0.79 crores, which was increased to Rs. 1.00
crore in 2020 due to GST and again it was increased to Rs. 7.54 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.(4.07) crores, which was reduced to Rs. (5.80) crores in
2020 due to GST and again it was increased to Rs. 3.71 in Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.(4.01)crores, which was reduced to Rs. (5.47)
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it increased to Rs.0 in Covid 19
pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.(1.16), which was reduced to Rs. (1.58) in 2020 due to
GST and covid 19 pandemic.
Table 5.25
Income Statement Khyati Multimedia-Entertainment Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)

Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 0.05 0.29 -- -- --


Other Income -- -- 0.01 0.06 --
Total Income 0.05 0.29 0.01 0.06 --
Expenditure -0.17 -0.44 -0.13 -0.1 -0.09
Interest -- -- -- -- --
PBDT -0.12 -0.15 -0.13 -0.04 -0.09
Depreciation -- -- -- -0.03 -0.03
PBT -0.12 -0.15 -0.13 -0.06 -0.12
Tax 0.03 0.07 -- 0.02 -0.01
Net Profit -0.09 -0.08 -0.13 -0.04 -0.13
Equity -- -- 10.8 -- 10.8
EPS -0.08 -0.07 -0.12 -0.04 -0.12
CEPS -- -- -0.12 -- -0.09
OPM % -247.92 -52.8 -- -- --
NPM % -185.42 -27.97 -- --

It was interpreted that:


1. Revenue in 2020 was Rs.0.29 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 0.05 crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.

25 | P a g e
2. Total Income in 2018 was Rs.0.06 crores, which was increased to Rs. 0.29
crore in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 0.05 due to Covid 19
pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.(0.12) crores, which was reduced to Rs. (0.15) crores in
2020 due to GST and again it was increased to Rs. (0.12) in Covid 19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.(0.13)crores, which was reduced to Rs. (0.08)
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it increased to Rs.(0.09) in Covid 19
pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.(0.12), which was reduced to Rs. (0.07) due to GST and
again it reduced to (0.08) in 2021.
Table 5.26
Income Statement Lords Ishwar Hotels Limited
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 3.11 7.53 8.64 6.98 5.65


Other Income 0.01 0.01 0 0.02 0.01
Total Income 3.12 7.54 8.65 7 5.66
Expenditure -3.19 -7.09 -8.09 -6.57 -5.37
Interest -- -- -- -- --
PBDT -0.07 0.45 0.56 0.43 0.29
Depreciation -0.29 -0.23 -0.3 -0.33 -0.41
PBT -0.36 0.22 0.25 0.11 -0.12
Tax -0.02 -0.05 -0.02 -0.31 --
Net Profit -0.38 0.18 0.23 -0.2 -0.12
Equity 7.47 7.47 7.47 7.47 7.47
EPS -0.51 0.23 0.3 -0.26 -0.16
CEPS -0.12 0.54 0.71 0.17 0.39
OPM % -2.32 5.97 6.42 6.19 5.14
NPM % -12.25 2.32 2.64 -2.86
It was presumed that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.5.65 crores, which was increased to Rs. 7.53 crores
in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs.3.11 due to Covid 19
pandemic.

26 | P a g e
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.5.66 crores, which was increased to Rs. 7.54
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 3.12 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.(0.12) crores, which was reduced to Rs. (0.22) crores in
2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. (0.36) due to Covid 19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.(0.12) crores, which was reduced to Rs. (0.18)
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.(0.51) Covid 19
pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.(0.16), which was increased to Rs. 0.23 due to GST and
again it reduced to Rs.(0.51) Covid 19 pandemic.
Table 5.27
Income Statement MAC Charles (India) Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)

Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 23.09 24.57 78.24 72.96 80


Other Income 3.89 3.43 10.57 10.63 -0.43
Total Income 26.98 28 88.8 83.59 79.57
Expenditure -21.18 - - -49.14 -36.6
23.42 22.63
Interest -10.39 - -10.7 -6.28 -0.67
11.04
PBDT 5.81 4.58 66.17 34.45 42.97
Depreciation -3.55 -3.57 -4.97 -5.21 -5.03
PBT 2.26 1.01 61.2 29.24 37.93
Tax -0.27 0.22 - -8.18 -9.54
17.17
Net Profit 1.07 12.46 44.03 21.07 28.4
Equity 13.1 13.1 13.1 13.1 13.1
EPS 1.51 0.94 33.61 1.61 21.67
CEPS 3.53 12.24 37.4 20.05 --
OPM % 70.15 63.56 98.25 55.83 54.55
NPM % 4.62 50.72 56.28 28.87 35.5

27 | P a g e
It was inferred that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.80 crores, which was increased to Rs. 78.24 crores
in 2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs.23.09 due to Covid 19
pandemic.
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.79.57 crores, which was increased to Rs. 88.80
crores in 2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 26.98 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.37.93 crores, which was increased to Rs. 61.20 crores
in 2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 2.26 due to Covid 19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.28.40 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 44.03
crores in 2019 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.1.07 Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.21.67, which was increased to Rs. 33.61 due to GST
and again it reduced to Rs.1.51 Covid 19 pandemic.

Table 5.28
Income Statement Mahindra Holidays & Resorts India Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)

Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 822.25 977.01 918.29 1,064.19 1,088.73


Other Income 86.52 60.11 45.15 30.01 17.2
Total Income 908.76 1,037.12 963.44 1,094.19 1,105.93
Expenditure -635.56 -811.5 -811.86 -832.24 -844.46
Interest -12.96 -15.99 -0.02 -- -0.02
PBDT 273.21 225.62 151.58 261.95 261.48
Depreciation -103.74 -101.67 -51.41 -54.8 -60.53
PBT 169.47 123.95 100.17 207.15 200.95
Tax -43.7 -232.16 -36.31 -72.8 -70.29
Net Profit 125.77 -108.22 63.86 134.36 130.65
Equity 132.92 132.92 132.9 132.76 88.24
EPS 9.46 -8.14 4.81 10.14 14.82
CEPS 17.27 -0.49 8.67 14.25 21.67
OPM % 34.8 24.73 16.51 24.61 24.02
NPM % 15.3 -11.08 6.95 12.63
It was assumed that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.1,088.73 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 822.25
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.

28 | P a g e
2. Total Income was Rs.1,105.93 crores in 2017, which was reduced to
Rs.908.76 crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.200.95 crores in 2017, which went down to 169.47 crores in
2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.130.65 crores in 2017, which has reduced to 125.77 crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.14.82 in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.9.46 in 2021 due to
GST and Covid-19.

Table 5.29
Income Statement Oriental Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)

Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 115.78 289.67 345.42 356.86 333.49


Other Income 7.44 11.67 11.3 12.02 11.12

Total Income 123.22 301.34 356.72 368.88 344.61


Expenditure - - - - -
169.81 277.23 225.92 332.69 317.64
Interest -22.01 -24.02 -27.18 -30.89 -32.19
PBDT -46.59 24.11 130.8 36.19 26.97
Depreciation -28.75 -27.7 -28.38 -27.66 -24.98
PBT -75.34 -3.59 102.42 8.53 1.99
Tax 21.96 -0.2 -12.98 -2.53 -0.45

Net Profit -53.38 -3.79 89.44 6 1.54


Equity 17.86 17.86 17.86 17.86 17.86
EPS -2.99 -0.21 5.01 0.34 0.09

CEPS -1.38 1.34 6.6 1.88 1.48


OPM % -21.23 16.62 45.74 18.8 17.74

NPM % -46.1 -1.31 25.89 1.68

It was construed that:

29 | P a g e
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.333.49 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 115.78
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
2. Total Income was Rs.344.61 crores in 2017, which was reduced to
Rs.123.22 crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.1.99 crores in 2017, which went down to (74.34) crores in 2021
due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.1.54 crores in 2017, which has reduced to (53.38) crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.0.09 in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.(2.99) in 2021 due to
GST and Covid-19.
Table 5.30
Income Statement Phoenix Township Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)

Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 9.33 20.45 20.04 17.81 14.53

Other Income 0.46 -- 0.54 0.31 0.37

Total Income 9.79 20.45 20.58 18.12 14.9

Expenditure -8.83 - -17 - -


17.19 15.23 12.25
Interest -0.8 -0.99 -0.65 -0.62 -0.53

PBDT 0.97 3.26 3.58 2.89 2.66

Depreciation -2.5 -2.51 -2.43 -2.04 -1.89

PBT -1.53 0.75 1.15 0.85 0.77

Tax -0.21 -0.38 -0.37 -0.22 -0.25

Net Profit -1.74 0.38 0.78 0.63 0.52

Equity 13.98 13.98 13.98 13.98 13.98

EPS -1.25 0.27 0.56 0.04 0.37

CEPS 0.54 2.06 2.3 1.91 1.72

OPM % 18.95 20.8 21.09 19.71 21.92

NPM % -18.66 1.83 3.89 3.53

30 | P a g e
It was concluded that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.14.53 crores, which was increased to Rs. 20.45
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs.9.33 due to Covid 19
pandemic.
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.14.90 crores, which was increased to Rs. 20.45
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 9.79 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.0.77 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 0.75 crores in
2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. (1.53) due to Covid 19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.0.37 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 0.38 crores
in 2020 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.(1.74) Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.0.37, which was reduced to Rs. 0.27 due to GST and
again it reduced to Rs.(1.25) Covid 19 pandemic.
Table 5.31
Income Statement of Polo Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Revenue 0.08 0.76 1.64 1.68 1.75
Other Income 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.01
Total Income 0.09 0.77 1.69 1.73 1.75
Expenditure -0.57 -1.06 -1.77 -2 -1.59
Interest -0.01 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.19
PBDT -0.49 -0.29 -0.08 -0.27 0.17
Depreciation -0.14 -0.14 -0.14 -0.14 -0.14
PBT -0.63 -0.44 -0.23 -0.41 0.02
Tax -- -- -- -0.1 --
Net Profit -0.63 -0.44 -0.23 -0.51 0.02
Equity 22.37 22.37 2.24 -- 22.37
EPS -0.28 -0.19 0.1 -0.23 0.01
CEPS -0.22 -0.13 -0.36 -- 0.07
OPM % -588.75 -34.91 -3.36 -13.78 20.34
NPM % -786.25 -57.44 -13.74 -30.42

It was assumed that:


1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.1.75 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 0.08 crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
2. Total Income was Rs.1.75 crores in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.0.09
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.

31 | P a g e
3. PBT was Rs.0.02 crores in 2017, which went down to (0.63) crores in 2021
due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.0.02 crores in 2017, which has reduced to (0.63) crores in
2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.0.01 in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.(0.28) in 2021 due to
GST and Covid-19.

Table 5.32
Income Statement of Ras Resorts & Apart Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 4.46 8.9 9.17 7.62 8.72


Other Income 0.07 0.44 0.1 0.16 --
Total Income 4.54 9.33 9.27 7.78 8.72
Expenditure -4.53 -8.76 -8.17 -7.1 -7.6
Interest -0.55 -0.58 -0.54 -0.27 -0.33
PBDT 0 0.58 1.1 0.68 1.12
Depreciation -0.52 -0.54 -0.45 -0.31 -0.34
PBT -0.52 0.04 0.65 0.36 0.78
Tax 0.12 0.05 -0.21 -0.05 -0.16
Net Profit -0.39 0.09 0.44 0.32 0.62
Equity 3.97 3.97 3.97 3.97 3.97
EPS -0.99 0.22 1.1 0.8 1.55
CEPS 0.32 1.58 2.23 1.59 2.41
OPM % 12.41 13.01 17.86 12.41 16.62
NPM % -8.83 0.99 4.77 4.18 7
It was inferred that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.8.72 crores, which was increased to Rs. 8.9 crores
in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs.4.46 due to Covid 19
pandemic.
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.8.72 crores, which was increased to Rs. 9.33
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 4.54 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.0.78 crores, which was reduced to Rs. (0.52) due to
GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.0.62 crores, which was reduced to Rs.(0.39) due
to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.

32 | P a g e
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.1.55, which was reduced to Rs. (0.99) due to GST and
Covid 19 pandemic.

Table 5.33
Income Statement Royale Manor Hotels & Industries Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 7.65 21.47 23.2 22.01 18.37


Other Income 1.36 0.69 0.73 0.31 --
Total Income 9.01 22.16 23.93 22.32 18.37
Expenditure -7.81 -18.17 -18.74 -18.16 -16.06
Interest -0.97 -1.09 -1.01 -1.4 -2.28
PBDT 1.2 3.99 5.19 4.16 2.31
Depreciation -0.91 -0.94 -1.06 -1.04 -1.01
PBT 0.29 3.04 4.13 3.12 1.3
Tax -0.01 -0.52 -0.82 -0.61 -0.28
Net Profit 0.28 2.52 3.3 2.51 1.02
Equity 16.93 16.93 16.93 16.93 16.93
EPS 0.16 1.49 1.95 1.48 0.59
CEPS 0.7 2.05 2.58 2.1 1.2
OPM % 28.36 23.65 26.71 25.24 24.99
NPM % 3.65 11.74 14.24 11.42 5

It was presumed that:


1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.18.37 crores, which was increased to Rs. 21.47
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs.7.65 due to Covid 19
pandemic.
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.18.37 crores, which was increased to Rs. 22.16
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 9.01 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.1.30 crores, which was increased to Rs.3.04 crores in
2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 0.29 due to Covid 19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.1.02 crores, which was increased to Rs. 2.52
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.0.28 Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.0.59 which was increased to Rs. 1.49 due to GST and
again it reduced to Rs.0.16 Covid 19 pandemic.

33 | P a g e
Table 5.34
Income Statement Reliable Ventures India Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 9.98 18.29 17.62 16.33 14.82


Other Income 0.18 1.14 0.47 0.31 0.42
Total Income 10.17 19.43 18.1 16.64 15.24
Expenditure -9.8 - - - -
15.47 14.34 13.77 11.95
Interest -0.03 0 -0.01 -0.02 -0.03
PBDT 0.37 3.96 3.76 2.87 3.29
Depreciation -0.97 -1.39 -1.56 -2.72 -1.38
PBT -0.6 2.57 2.21 0.16 1.91
Tax -0.04 -0.72 -0.4 0.08 -0.53
Net Profit -0.64 1.85 1.81 0.24 1.38
Equity 11.01 11.01 11.01 11.01 11.01
EPS 0.14 1.35 1.71 -- 1.26
CEPS 0.3 2.94 3.05 2.68 2.51
OPM % 4 21.68 21.4 17.74 22.39
NPM % -6.38 10.12 10.26 1.45 9

It was concluded that:


1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.14.82 crores, which was increased to Rs. 18.29
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs.9.98 due to Covid 19
pandemic.
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.15.24 crores, which was increased to Rs. 19.43
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 10.17 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.1.91 crores, which was increased to Rs.2.57 crores in
2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. (0.6) due to Covid 19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.1.38 crores, which was increased to Rs. 1.85
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.(0.64) Covid 19
pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.1.26 which was increased to Rs. 1.35 due to GST and
again it reduced to Rs.0.14 Covid 19 pandemic.

34 | P a g e
Table 5.35
Income Statement Royal Orchid Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 47.82 114.84 112.6 102.14 91.31


Other Income 5.57 7.17 7.44 5.99 8.25
Total Income 53.4 122.01 120.04 108.13 99.55
Expenditure -83.62 -100.81 -97.8 -88.26 -85.36
Interest -8.57 -7.67 -4.52 -5.24 -6.02
PBDT -30.23 21.2 22.24 19.87 14.19
Depreciation -8.74 -8.28 -4.02 -4.39 -4.25
PBT -38.96 12.92 18.22 15.49 9.95
Tax 4.41 -3.81 -5.6 -4.51 -0.04
Net Profit -34.55 9.11 12.62 10.98 9.91
Equity 27.43 27.43 27.41 27.3 --
EPS -12.6 3.41 4.59 4.03 3.64
CEPS -9.41 6.34 6.07 5.63 --
OPM % -45.28 25.14 23.76 24.58 22.14
NPM % -72.24 7.94 11.21 10.75 10.85

It was inferred that:


1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.91.31 crores, which was increased to Rs. 114.84
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs.47.82 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.99.55 crores, which was increased to Rs.
122.01 crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 53.40 due to
Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.9.95 crores, which was increased to Rs.18.22 crores in
2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. (38.96) due to Covid 19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.9.91 crores, which was increased to Rs. 12.62
crores in 2019 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.(34.55) Covid 19
pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.3.64 which was increased to Rs. 3.41 due to GST and
again it reduced to Rs.(12.60) Covid 19 pandemic.

35 | P a g e
Table 5.36
Income Statement of Savera Industries Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 19.62 67.29 71.87 72.44 68.67


Other Income 1.14 0.62 0.71 0.68 --
Total Income 20.77 67.9 72.58 73.12 68.67
Expenditure -21.59 - - -62.72 -
57.42 59.85 59.62
Interest -0.45 -0.55 -0.51 -1.1 -1.7
PBDT -0.82 10.49 12.74 10.4 9.05
Depreciation -3.72 -4.58 -3.47 -3.6 -4.45
PBT -4.54 5.9 9.26 6.8 4.6
Tax 0.44 -1.63 -2.98 -1.67 -2.23
Net Profit -4.1 4.28 6.28 5.13 2.38
Equity 11.93 11.93 11.93 11.93 11.93
EPS -3.44 3.59 5.27 4.3 1.99
CEPS -0.32 7.43 8.18 7.33 5.72
OPM % -1.89 16.41 18.43 15.88 15.66
NPM % -20.88 6.36 8.74 7.09 3.4
It was understood that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.68.67 crores, which was increased to Rs. 71.87
crores in 2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs.19.62 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.68.67 crores, which was increased to Rs. 72.58
crores in 2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 20.77 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.4.60 crores, which was increased to Rs.9.26 crores in
2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. (4.54) due to Covid 19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.2.38 crores, which was increased to Rs. 6.28
crores in 2019 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.(4.10) Covid 19
pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.1.99 which was increased to Rs. 5.27 in 2019 due to
GST and again it reduced to Rs.(3.44) in 2021due to Covid 19 pandemic.

36 | P a g e
Table 5.37
Income Statement of Sayaji Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Revenue 75.17 209.69 218.25 191.5 158.19
Other Income 7.82 3.3 2.42 2.46 1.39
Total Income 82.99 212.99 220.66 193.97 159.58
Expenditure -83.6 -187.95 -200.59 -177.28 -144.5
Interest -20.06 -21.84 -15.92 -13.75 -15.27
PBDT -0.61 25.04 20.08 16.69 15.08
Depreciation -26.08 -28.81 -20.01 -20.45 -20.74
PBT -26.69 -3.77 0.06 -3.77 -5.66
Tax 4.95 1.97 -3.16 -0.47 1.49
Net Profit -21.74 -1.8 -3.1 -4.24 -4.17
Equity 17.52 17.52 17.52 17.52 --
EPS -13.1 -1.71 -2.45 -3.1 -3.07
CEPS 2.48 15.42 9.66 9.26 --
OPM % 25.88 22.35 16.49 15.89 19.19
NPM % -28.92 -0.86 -1.42 -2.21

It was presumed that:


1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.158.19 crores, which was increased to Rs. 209.69
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs.75.17 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.159.58 crores, which was increased to Rs.
212.99 crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 82.99 due to
Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.(5.66) crores, which was reduced to Rs.(3.77) crores in
2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 26.69 in 2021 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.(4.17) crores, which was reduced to Rs. (1.8)
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.(21.74) in 2021due to
Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.(3.07) which was increased to Rs. (1.71) in 2020 due to
GST and again it reduced to Rs.(13.10) Covid 19 pandemic.

37 | P a g e
Table 5.38
Income Statement Sinclairs Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Revenue 17.27 45.45 45.75 45.91 47.06
Other Income 5.87 1.72 3.83 2.26 1.87
Total Income 23.14 47.17 49.58 48.17 48.93
Expenditure -13.46 -28.63 -27.97 -26.84 -27.03
Interest -0.53 -- -- -- --
PBDT 9.68 18.54 21.61 21.33 21.9
Depreciation -5.45 -6.76 -7.53 -7.38 -7.96
PBT 4.23 11.78 14.09 13.95 13.94
Tax -0.72 -2.3 -4.34 -2.21 -4.93
Net Profit 3.51 9.49 9.75 11.74 9.01
Equity 5.57 5.57 5.57 5.57 5.57
EPS 1.26 3.41 17.5 21.07 16.18
CEPS 3.22 5.83 31.01 34.33 30.47
OPM % 59.12 40.79 47.24 46.47 46.54
NPM % 20.33 20.88 21.3 25.57 1

It was inferred that:


1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.47.06 crores, which was increased to Rs. 45.75
crores in 2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs.17.27 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.48.93 crores, which was increased to Rs. 49.58
crores in 2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 23.14 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.13.94 crores, which was increased to Rs.14.09 crores in
2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 4.23 in 2021 due to Covid 19
pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.9.01 crores, which was increased to Rs. 9.75
crores in 2019 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.3.51 in 2021due to Covid
19 pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.16.18 which was increased to Rs. 17.50 in 2020 due to
GST and again it reduced to Rs.1.26 Covid 19 pandemic.

38 | P a g e
Table 5.39
Income Statement of Sterling Green Woods Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 2.15 2.84 3.77 4.55 2.96


Other Income 0.4 0.35 0.49 0.38 --
Total Income 2.55 3.19 4.26 4.92 2.96
Expenditure -2.35 -4.32 -4.47 -3.81 -1.52
Interest -0.35 -1.03 -0.85 -0.68 -0.6
PBDT 0.2 -1.13 -0.2 1.11 1.43
Depreciation -0.57 -0.47 -0.67 -0.68 -0.73
PBT -0.37 -1.6 -0.87 0.43 0.7
Tax 0.06 0.43 -0.01 0.02 0.04
Net Profit -0.31 -1.16 -0.88 0.45 0.74
Equity 4.24 4.24 4.24 4.24 4.24
EPS -0.74 -2.74 -2.08 1.06 1.73
CEPS 0.61 -1.64 -0.51 2.67 3.46
OPM % 25.65 -3.49 17.23 39.56 68.63
NPM % -14.53 -40.88 -23.38 9.9

It was presumed that:


1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.2.96 crores, which was increased to Rs. 3.77 crores
in 2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs.2.15 crores due to Covid 19
pandemic.
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.2.96 crores, which was increased to Rs. 4.26
crores in 2019 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 2.55 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.0.7 crores, which was reduced to Rs.(1.6) crores in
2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. (0.37) in 2021 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.0.74 crores, which was increased to Rs. (1.16)
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it increased to Rs.(0.31) in 2021 in Covid
19 pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.1.73 which was reduced to Rs. (2.74) in 2020 due to
GST and again it increased to Rs.(0.74) in Covid 19 pandemic.

39 | P a g e
Table 5.40
Income Statement of Tajgvk Hotels & Resorts Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 94.17 312.62 316.87 288.25 269.77


Other Income 2.64 1.22 7.22 2.63 --
Total Income 96.81 313.84 324.09 290.88 269.77
Expenditure -116.26 -261.11 -269.26 -241.6 -233.03
Interest -19.91 -22.63 -21.58 -24.97 -29.07
PBDT -19.45 52.73 54.83 49.28 36.74
Depreciation -16.55 -16.79 -16.7 -17.27 -18.13
PBT -36 35.94 38.13 32.01 18.61
Tax 9.55 -12.09 -13.81 -11.01 -8.25
Net Profit -26.45 23.85 24.32 21 10.36
Equity 12.54 12.54 12.54 12.54 12.54
EPS -4.17 3.72 3.87 3.38 1.63
CEPS -1.58 6.48 6.54 6.1 4.54
OPM % 0.49 24.11 24.11 25.76 24.39
NPM % -28.09 7.63 7.68 7.29 3.84
It was concluded that:
1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.269.77 crores, which was increased to Rs. 312.62
crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs.94.17 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
2. Total Income in 2017 was Rs.269.77 crores, which was increased to Rs.
313.84 crores in 2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. 96.81 due to
Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT in 2017 was Rs.18.61 crores, which was increased to Rs.35.94 crores in
2020 due to GST and again it was reduced to Rs. (36.00) in 2021 due to Covid
19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit in 2017 was Rs.10.36 crores, which was increased to Rs. 24.32
crores in 2019 due to GST and again it reduced to Rs.(26.45) in 2021due to
Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS in 2017 was Rs.1.63 which was increased to Rs. 3.72 in 2020 due to
GST and again it reduced to Rs.(4.17) Covid 19 pandemic.

40 | P a g e
Table 5.41
Income Statement of Tgb Banquets And Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 14.79 33.58 79.76 118.74 136.86


Other Income 1.47 20.31 6.52 4.49 2.8
Total Income 16.26 53.9 86.28 123.23 139.66
Expenditure -22.62 -50.42 -129.3 -131.03 -128.1
Interest -1.14 -1.24 -1.39 -3.19 -15.7
PBDT -6.36 3.48 -43.03 -7.81 11.57
Depreciation -2 -3.06 -2.75 -4.94 -19.46
PBT -8.36 0.42 -45.78 -12.75 -7.89
Tax 0.12 0.44 -8.14 13.29 1.28
Net Profit -8.25 0.86 -53.92 0.54 -6.61
Equity 29.29 29.29 29.29 29.29 29.29
EPS -2.82 0.29 -18.41 0.19 --
CEPS -2.13 1.34 -17.47 1.87 4.39
OPM % -35.28 14.06 -52.2 -3.89 19.92
NPM % -55.76 2.57 -67.6 0.46

It was surmised that:


1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.136.86 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 14.78
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
2. Total Income was Rs.139.66 crores in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.16.26
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.(7.89) crores in 2017, which went down to (8.36) crores in
2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.(6.61) crores in 2017, which has reduced to (8.25) crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.0.19 in 2018, which was reduced to Rs.(2.82) in 2021 due to
GST and Covid-19.

41 | P a g e
Table 5.42
Income Statement of The Byke of Hospitality Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Revenue 65.61 122.19 146.77 177.41 269.98


Other Income 0.9 1.01 0.91 0.77 0.14
Total Income 66.5 123.19 147.68 178.18 270.12
Expenditure -59.95 -92.69 -125.13 -109.46 -208.88
Interest -8.34 -6.59 -2.04 -0.75 -1.09
PBDT 6.55 30.5 22.55 68.72 61.24
Depreciation -26.47 -28.05 -14.95 -13.65 -12.77
PBT -19.92 2.46 7.6 55.08 48.47
Tax 1.68 1.69 -2.54 -19.06 -16.77
Net Profit -18.24 4.15 5.06 36.02 31.7
Equity 40.1 40.1 40.1 40.1 40.1
EPS -4.55 1.03 1.26 8.98 7.9
CEPS 2.05 8.03 4.99 12.39 11.09
OPM % 22.69 30.35 16.75 39.16 23.09
NPM % -27.8 3.39 3.45 20.3 11.74

It was assumed that:


1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.269.98 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 65.61
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
2. Total Income was Rs.270.12 crores in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.66.50
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.48.47 crores in 2017, which went down to (19.92) crores in
2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.31.70 crores in 2017, which has reduced to (18.24) crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.7.9 in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.(4.55) in 2021 due to
GST and Covid-19.

42 | P a g e
Table 5.43
Income Statement of Velan Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Revenue 0.04 3.29 6.35 8.57 11.73
Other Income 0.08 0.11 0.09 0.14 0.65
Total Income 0.12 3.39 6.44 8.71 12.38
Expenditure 0.4 -4.79 -6.87 -8.58 -29.28
Interest 0 -0.13 -0.23 -0.24 -18.37
PBDT 0.52 -1.4 -0.43 0.13 -16.89
Depreciation -1.68 -1.78 -1.8 -1.85 -1.96
PBT -1.16 -3.18 -2.23 -1.72 -18.85
Tax 1.23 -- -- -0.76 -0.67
Net Profit 0.07 -3.18 -2.23 -2.48 -19.52
Equity 31.96 31.96 31.96 31.96 31.96
EPS 0.02 -0.99 -0.7 -0.77 -6.11
CEPS 0.55 -0.44 -0.13 -0.2 -5.5
OPM % 1310 -38.53 -3.06 4.31 12.6
NPM % 177.5 -96.62 -35.09 -28.88 -1

It was presumed that:


1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.11.73 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 0.04 crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
2. Total Income was Rs.12.38 crores in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.0.12
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.(18.85) crores in 2017, which was decreased to (1.16) crores in
2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.(19.52) crores in 2017, which has increased to 0.07 crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.(6.11) in 2017, which was increased to Rs.(0.02) in 2021 due to
GST and Covid-19.

43 | P a g e
Table 5.44
Income Statement of Viceroy Hotels Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Revenue 22.07 81.44 86.49 83.83 86.84
Other Income 2.68 6.93 2.05 17.07 --
Total Income 24.74 88.37 88.53 100.9 86.84
Expenditure -36.38 -86.69 -89.28 -521.31 -83.54
Interest -0.3 -0.52 -0.73 -20.72 -25.56
PBDT -11.64 1.68 -0.75 -420.41 -4.68
Depreciation -8.5 -8.93 -9.18 -8.33 -5.95
PBT -20.14 -7.25 -9.93 -428.74 -10.63
Tax 3.86 -1.96 -2.56 -9.89 -0.91
Net Profit -16.27 -9.2 -12.49 -438.63 -11.54
Equity 42.41 42.41 42.41 42.41 42.41
EPS -3.84 -2.17 -2.95 -103.44 -2.72
CEPS -1.83 -0.06 -0.78 -101.47 -1.32
OPM % -51.36 2.71 -0.03 -476.8 24.04
NPM % -73.74 -11.3 -14.44 -523.26 -13

It was construed that:


1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.86.84 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 22.07
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
2. Total Income was Rs.86.84 crores in 2017, it has increased to Rs.88.37
crores in 2020 due to GST and was reduced to Rs.24.74 crores in 2021 Covid
19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.(10.63) crores in 2017, which was decreased to (20.14) crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.(11.54) crores in 2017, which has reduced to (16.27)
crores in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.(2.72) in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.(3.84) in 2021 due to
GST and Covid-19.

44 | P a g e
Table 5.45
Income Statement of Woodsvilla Ltd
(Rs. In Crores)
Particulars 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Revenue 0.32 0.7 0.65 0.94 0.91
Other Income 0.02 0.03 0.01 0 --
Total Income 0.34 0.72 0.66 0.95 0.91
Expenditure -0.24 -0.62 -0.57 -0.88 -0.8
Interest 0 -- 0 0 0
PBDT 0.1 0.11 0.09 0.07 0.11
Depreciation -0.1 -0.1 -0.09 -0.07 -0.07
PBT 0 0.01 0 0 0.05
Tax 0 0 -0.01 0 0
Net Profit 0 0.01 -0.01 0 0.05
Equity 3.01 3.01 3.01 3.01 3.01
EPS -- -0.11 -0.09 0.24 0.16
CEPS 0.17 0.18 0.28 0.22 0.39
OPM % 32.2 15.21 14.37 7.74 12.67
NPM % 0.31 1 -0.77 -0.32 5.4
Source: https://www.bseindia.com/sensex/code/35/

It was assumed that:


1. Revenue in 2017 was Rs.0.91 crores, which was reduced to Rs. 0.32 crores
in 2021 due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
2. Total Income was Rs.0.91 crores in 2017, it was reduced to Rs.0.34 crores in
2021 Covid 19 pandemic.
3. PBT was Rs.0.05 crores in 2017, which was decreased to Rs. 0 in 2021 due
to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
4. Net Profit was Rs.0.05 crores in 2017, which has reduced to Rs.0 in 2021
due to GST and Covid 19 pandemic.
5. EPS was Rs.0.16 in 2017, which was reduced to Rs.(0.11) in 2020 due to
GST and Covid-19.

45 | P a g e
Table 5.46
Statement of Revenue of Hotels for the period 2017 to 2021
(Rs. In Crores)
Hotels 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
1 27.47 70.13 70.28 62.48 59.64
2 29.41 92.1 103.44 102.14 98.32
3 0.31 0 0 0 0
4 72.58 252.39 273.52 274.44 251.19
5 24.24 63.64 59.68 47.43 49.57
6 2.34 4.3 5.18 4.79 4.77
7 0 0 52.75 134.89 132.66
8 46.5 127.72 214.68 236.8 260.39
9 10.61 53.4 62.28 63.61 63.86
10 2.48 4.79 4.78 4.62 4.18
11 2.94 9.28 11.22 10.93 8.83
12 101.39 249.08 264.18 263.57 263.56
13 432.7 1,350.30 1,543.24 1,350.28 1,277.55
14 8.9 39.47 46.72 47.2 41.47
15 0.99 3.75 3.7 3.31 3.25
16 18.92 145.68 154.34 718.54 699.94
17 0 0 0 0 0
18 10.28 25.91 28.94 26.82 22.78
19 1.72 9.71 10.65 9.29 8.72
20 1,133.15 2,743.47 2,780.41 2,583.95 2,391.25
21 175.76 336.27 349.96 343.87 473.15
22 15.55 37.73 38.03 33.78 36.15
23 51.62 179.31 192.39 168.52 156.67
24 2.27 0.18 0.23 0.13 0.57
25 0.05 0.29 0 0 0
26 3.11 7.53 8.64 6.98 5.65
27 23.09 24.57 78.24 72.96 80
28 822.25 977.01 918.29 1,064.19 1,088.73
29 115.78 289.67 345.42 356.86 333.49
30 9.33 20.45 20.04 17.81 14.53
31 0.08 0.76 1.64 1.68 1.75
32 4.46 8.9 9.17 7.62 8.72
33 7.65 21.47 23.2 22.01 18.37
34 9.98 18.29 17.62 16.33 14.82
35 47.82 114.84 112.6 102.14 91.31
36 19.62 67.29 71.87 72.44 68.67
37 75.17 209.69 218.25 191.5 158.19

46 | P a g e
38 17.27 45.45 45.75 45.91 47.06
39 2.15 2.84 3.77 4.55 2.96
40 94.17 312.62 316.87 288.25 269.77
41 14.79 33.58 79.76 118.74 136.86
42 65.61 122.19 146.77 177.41 269.98
43 0.04 3.29 6.35 8.57 11.73
44 22.07 81.44 86.49 83.83 86.84
45 0.32 0.7 0.65 0.94 0.91

Figure 5.1 Statement of Revenue

Statement of Revenue

100%

90% 2017 45.00 9018.81 200.42 182697.42

80%
2018 45.00
70% 204597.11
9152.11 203.38
60%

50% 2019 45.00


8781.99 195.16 226740.17
40%
2020 45.00
30%
8161.48 181.37
20% 214250.50
2021 45.00
10%
3526.94 78.38
44591.84
0%
Year Count Sum Average Variance

Series1 Series2 Series3 Series4 Series5

Table No. 5.47 Statement of Revenue for the period 2017 to 2021

ONE WAY ANOVA ANALYSIS


Source of
Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 503155.21 4.00 125788.80 0.72 0.58 2.41

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 5 Years.

47 | P a g e
H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 5 Years.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.72 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.41 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Research Scholar
concluded that there is no significant difference in Revenue of Hotels
listed on BSE during the period 2017 to 2021.

Table No.5.48 Descriptive Statistics of Revenue of 2018 (Before After


GST) and 2017 (Before GST)

2018 (After GST) 2017 (Before GST)


Mean 203.38 Mean 200.42
Standard Error 67.43 Standard Error 63.72
Median 47.43 Median 49.57
Standard Deviation 452.32 Standard Deviation 427.43
Sample Variance 204597.11 Sample Variance 182697.42
Count 45.00 Count 45.00
Confidence Level
(95.0%) 135.89 Confidence Level (95.0%) 128.41

z-Test: Two Sample for Means


2018
(After
GST) 2017 (Before GST)
Mean 203.38 200.42
Known Variance 204597.11 182697.42
Observations 45.00 45.00
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0.00
z 0.03
P(Z<=z) two-tail 0.97
z Critical two-tail 1.96

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2017 and


2018. H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2017 and
2018.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value 0.03 is less than Z
critical value 1.96 and P Value is also greater than 0.05 i.e.0.97. Research
Scholar concluded that there is no significant difference in Revenue of
Hotels listed on BSE during the period 2017 to 2018.

48 | P a g e
Table No.5.49 Statement of Total Income of Hotels for the period 2017 to
2021
(Rs. In Crores)
Hotels 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
1 28.18 71.16 71.73 63.82 60.84
2 38.75 101.08 113.71 107.75 107.11
3 0.33 0.11 0.83 1.15 1.81
4 74.45 266.95 281.68 305.55 260.95
5 24.81 63.84 60.39 48.28 51.14
6 2.34 4.3 5.2 4.84 4.93
7 0.08 0.1 55.22 136.32 133.79
8 52.3 127.72 214.68 236.8 260.39
9 16.81 60.74 70.76 64.34 64.8
10 2.6 4.94 4.79 4.63 4.18
11 3.02 9.36 11.37 11.01 9.09
12 104.45 258.07 273.7 269.27 271.68
13 473.64 1,434.31 1,627.26 1,434.04 1,376.78
14 10.23 40.16 47.55 47.44 42.23
15 3.06 5.92 5.66 5.02 5.12
16 44.14 152.19 158.52 743.12 713.79
17 0.12 0.13 0.18 0.15 0.13
18 10.5 26.32 29.55 27.44 23.38
19 1.73 9.84 10.78 9.52 8.92
20 1,243.67 2,877.88 2,870.91 2,639.34 2,445.11
21 197.22 357.49 371.73 370.64 495.14
22 15.67 37.91 38.18 34.81 36.37
23 52.63 180.21 194.19 175.29 164.53
24 7.54 1 26.25 0.17 0.79
25 0.05 0.29 0.01 0.06 0
26 3.12 7.54 8.65 7 5.66
27 26.98 28 88.8 83.59 79.57
28 908.76 1,037.12 963.44 1,094.19 1,105.93
29 123.22 301.34 356.72 368.88 344.61
30 9.79 20.45 20.58 18.12 14.9
31 0.09 0.77 1.69 1.73 1.75
32 4.54 9.33 9.27 7.78 8.72
33 9.01 22.16 23.93 22.32 18.37
34 10.17 19.43 18.1 16.64 15.24
35 53.4 122.01 120.04 108.13 99.55
36 20.77 67.9 72.58 73.12 68.67
37 82.99 212.99 220.66 193.97 159.58
38 23.14 47.17 49.58 48.17 48.93
39 2.55 3.19 4.26 4.92 2.96

49 | P a g e
40 96.81 313.84 324.09 290.88 269.77
41 16.26 53.9 86.28 123.23 139.66
42 66.5 123.19 147.68 178.18 270.12
43 0.12 3.39 6.44 8.71 12.38
44 2.68 6.93 2.05 17.07 0
45 0.34 0.72 0.66 0.95 0.91

Figure 5.2 Statement of Total Income

Statement of Total Income

Variance 53902.21 237577.61 244741.51 217579.11 195026.59

Average 85.99 188.74 201.56 209.08 204.67


SUMMA

Sum 3869.56 8493.39 9070.33 9408.38 9210.28

Count 45.00 45.00 45.00 45.00 45.00

Year 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Series1Series2Series3Series4Series5

Table No. 5.50 Statement of Total Income for the period 2017 to 2021

ONE WAY ANOVA ANALYSIS


Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between
Groups 486607.71 4.00 121651.93 0.64 0.63 2.41

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 5 Years.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 5 Years.

50 | P a g e
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.64 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.41 and P-value is also more than 0.05 i.e 0.63. Research
Scholar concluded that there is no significant difference in Total Income
of Hotels listed on BSE during the period 2017 to 2021.

Table No.5.51
Descriptive Statistics of Total Income of 2018 (Before After GST) and
2017 (Before GST)
2018 (After GST) 2017 (Before GST)

Mean 209.08 Mean 204.67


Standard Error 69.53 Standard Error 65.83
Median 48.17 Median 48.93
Standard Deviation 466.45 Standard Deviation 441.62
Sample Variance 217579.11 Sample Variance 195026.59
Count 45.00 Count 45.00
Confidence Level Confidence Level
(95.0%) 140.14 (95.0%) 132.68

z-Test: Two Sample for Means


2018 2017
Mean 209.08 204.67
Known Variance 217579.11 195026.59
Observations 45.00 45.00
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0.00
z 0.05
P(Z<=z) two-tail 0.96
z Critical two-tail 1.96

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2017 and 2018.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2017 and 2018
Years.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value 0.05 is less than Z
critical value 1.96. Research Scholar concluded that there is no significant
difference in Total Income of Hotels listed on BSE during the period 2017
to 2018.

51 | P a g e
Table No.5.52 Statement of Profit before Tax of Hotels for the period 2017
to 2021
(Rs. In Crores)
Hotels 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
1 -5.45 14.05 13.93 12.91 14.36
2 0.49 22.14 24.44 18.74 16.89
3 -8.74 -6.46 -8.3 -3.25 -5.17
4 -695.13 -73.95 -42.08 -2.75 -27.4
5 -6.97 13.5 12.18 7.85 10.73
6 -0.62 -0.4 0.39 0.2 0.22
7 -14.27 -21.32 -193.79 -1.66 -6.64
8 -38.23 -40.27 -15.43 -10.03 -7.01
9 -6.96 4.75 12.93 13.27 10.59
10 -0.82 1.62 0.39 0.36 0.33
11 -5.91 -3.33 -1.65 -2.99 -3.54
12 -37.15 43 58.35 58.66 64.93
13 -443.05 109.1 163.7 173.86 127.85
14 -18.02 -11.32 -5.14 -0.73 -5.63
15 2.7 5.49 5.18 4.53 4.73
16 -35.93 -20.19 -37.8 -23.22 -102.51
17 -0.05 -0.1 -2.93 -0.09 -0.04
18 -1.53 1.35 2.51 1.76 1.58
19 -1.64 -0.57 -0.01 -0.31 -0.04
20 -640.28 437.74 417.54 284.23 258.85
21 -23.79 42.68 62.23 44.94 17.52
22 -10.75 1.06 1.65 0.31 1.27
23 -37.15 35.94 35.82 51.09 40.58
24 3.71 -5.8 16.52 -1.12 -4.07
25 -0.12 -0.15 -0.13 -0.06 -0.12
26 -0.36 0.22 0.25 0.11 -0.12
27 2.26 1.01 61.2 29.24 37.93
28 169.47 123.95 100.17 207.15 200.95
29 -75.34 -3.59 102.42 8.53 1.99
30 -1.53 0.75 1.15 0.85 0.77
31 -0.63 -0.44 -0.23 -0.41 0.02
32 -0.52 0.04 0.65 0.36 0.78
33 0.29 3.04 4.13 3.12 1.3
34 -0.6 2.57 2.21 0.16 1.91
35 -38.96 12.92 18.22 15.49 9.95
36 -4.54 5.9 9.26 6.8 4.6
37 -26.69 -3.77 0.06 -3.77 -5.66
38 4.23 11.78 14.09 13.95 13.94

52 | P a g e
39 -0.37 -1.6 -0.87 0.43 0.7
40 -36 35.94 38.13 32.01 18.61
41 -8.36 0.42 -45.78 -12.75 -7.89
42 -19.92 2.46 7.6 55.08 48.47
43 -1.16 -3.18 -2.23 -1.72 -18.85
44 -20.14 -7.25 -9.93 -428.74 -10.63
45 0 0.01 0 0 0.05

Table No. 5.53 Descriptive Statistics of Profit before tax for the period
2017 to 2021

Anova: Single Factor


SUMMARY
Year Count Sum Average Variance
2021 45.00 -2084.53 -46.32 23607.44
2020 45.00 729.74 16.22 5064.89
2019 45.00 821.00 18.24 6042.16
2018 45.00 552.39 12.28 7866.86
2017 45.00 707.08 15.71 3090.84

Figure 5.3 Statement of Profit Before Tax

Statement of PBT
100%
90%
9134.44
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% 2009576.44 220.00 3.80 0.01 2.41
20%
34731.12
10%
0%

138924.47 4.00
SS df MS F P-value F crit

Between GroupsWithin Groups

53 | P a g e
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 5 Years.
H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 5 Years.
Conclusion: Alternative hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 3.80 is
more than F critical value i.e 2.41 and P-value is also less than 0.05.
Research Scholar concluded that there is significant difference in Total
Income of Hotels listed on BSE during the period 2017 to 2021.

Table No.5.54 Descriptive Statistics of Profit Before Tax of 2018 (Before


After GST) and 2017 (Before GST)
2018 (After GST) 2017 (Before GST)

Mean 12.28 Mean 15.71


Standard Error 13.22 Standard Error 8.29
Median 0.36 Median 0.78
Standard Deviation 88.70 Standard Deviation 55.60
Sample Variance 7866.86 Sample Variance 3090.84
Count 45.00 Count 45.00
Confidence Confidence
Level(95.0%) 26.65 Level(95.0%) 16.70

z-Test: Two Sample for Means

2018
(After
GST) 2017 (Before GST)
Mean 12.28 15.71
Known Variance 7866.86 3090.84
Observations 45.00 45.00
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0.00
z -0.22
P(Z<=z) two-tail 0.83
z Critical two-tail 1.96

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 Years.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 Years.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value (0.22)is less than Z
critical value 1.96. Research Scholar concluded that there is no significant
difference in Profit Before Tax of Hotels listed on BSE during the period
2017 to 2018.

54 | P a g e
Table No.5.55 Statement of Net Profit of Hotels for the period 2017 to
2021
(Rs. In Crores)
Hotels 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
1 -4.08 11.26 11.37 8.63 8.79
2 0.69 13.87 17.78 14.74 12.96
3 -10.08 -7.89 -18.15 -3.25 -5.17
4 -695.14 -63.13 -32.78 -2.42 -15.61
5 -5.23 10.61 8.72 6.48 6.82
6 -0.57 -0.35 0.28 0.25 0.15
7 -14.27 -21.32 -194.36 -1.66 -6.03
8 -41.46 -44.97 -21.92 -17.25 -14.91
9 -6.43 2.87 9.81 8.23 6.91
10 -0.8 1.51 0.28 0.27 0.23
11 -5.91 -3.33 -1.65 -2.99 -3.54
12 -26.74 37.96 37.94 37.79 42.78
13 -343.13 124.47 113.33 112.27 96.53
14 -14.18 -8.77 -1.81 -0.7 -3.89
15 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79
16 -35.93 193.71 -118.9 -23.22 -102.51
17 -0.05 -0.1 -2.93 -0.09 -0.04
18 -1.44 1.26 1.77 1.93 1.04
19 -1.51 -0.77 0 -0.06 -0.03
20 -524.78 401.41 263.7 147.77 141.94
21 -27.2 22.48 42.16 23.62 12.05
22 -10.96 0.68 1.5 0.92 0.25
23 -27.57 35.7 25.07 37.89 40.58
24 0 -5.47 22.53 -0.99 -4.01
25 -0.09 -0.08 -0.13 -0.04 -0.13
26 -0.38 0.18 0.23 -0.2 -0.12
27 1.07 12.46 44.03 21.07 28.4
28 125.77 -108.22 63.86 134.36 130.65
29 -53.38 -3.79 89.44 6 1.54
30 -1.74 0.38 0.78 0.63 0.52
31 -0.63 -0.44 -0.23 -0.51 0.02
32 -0.39 0.09 0.44 0.32 0.62
33 0.28 2.52 3.3 2.51 1.02
34 -0.64 1.85 1.81 0.24 1.38
35 -34.55 9.11 12.62 10.98 9.91
36 -4.1 4.28 6.28 5.13 2.38
37 -21.74 -1.8 -3.1 -4.24 -4.17
38 3.51 9.49 9.75 11.74 9.01
39 -0.31 -1.16 -0.88 0.45 0.74

55 | P a g e
40 -26.45 23.85 24.32 21 10.36
41 -8.25 0.86 -53.92 0.54 -6.61
42 -18.24 4.15 5.06 36.02 31.7
43 0.07 -3.18 -2.23 -2.48 -19.52
44 -16.27 -9.2 -12.49 -438.63 -11.54
45 0 0.01 -0.01 0 0.05

Figure 5.4 Statement of Net Profit

Statement of Net Profit

1377.91
100%
2017 45.00
5717.87

80%
3554.12
2018 45.00

5180.45
60%
2019 45.00

405.29 9.01
40%
45.00 156.84 3.49
2020 356.46 7.92 18819.72

20%
2021 45.00 646.84 14.37

0%
Year Count Sum Average Variance

-20%
-1849.44 -41.10

-40%

-60%
Series1Series2Series3Series4Series5

56 | P a g e
Table No. 5.56 Descriptive Statistics of Net Profit for the period 2017 to
2021

ONE WAY ANOVA ANALYSIS


P-
Source of Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 91969.34 4.00 22992.34 3.32 0.01 2.41

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 5 Years.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 5 Years.
Conclusion: Alternative hypothesis is fail to rejcet as F value = 3.32 is
more than F critical value i.e 2.41 and P-value is also less than 0.05.
Research Scholar concluded that there is significant difference in Net
Profits of Hotels listed on BSE during the period 2017 to 2021.

Table No. 5.57 Descriptive Statistics of Net Profit for the period 2017 to
2018
2018 (After GST) 2017 (Before GST)

Mean 3.49 Mean 9.01


Standard Error 11.27 Standard Error 5.53
Median 0.54 Median 0.62
Standard Deviation 75.62 Standard Deviation 37.12
Sample Variance 5717.87 Sample Variance 1377.91
Count 45.00 Count 45.00
Confidence Confidence
Level(95.0%) 22.72 Level(95.0%) 11.15

z-Test: Two Sample for Means


2018 2017
Mean 3.49 9.01
Known Variance 5717.87 1377.91
Observations 45.00 45.00
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0.00
z -0.44
P(Z<=z) two-tail 0.66
z Critical two-tail 1.96
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2
Years. H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2
Years.

57 | P a g e
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value (0.44) is less than Z
critical value 1.96. P value is also more than 0.05 ie. 0.66. Research
Scholar concluded that there is no significant difference in Profit before
Tax of Hotels listed on BSE during the period 2017 to 2018.

Table No. 5.58 Statement of Earnings per Share of Hotels for the
period 2017 to 2021
Hotels 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
1 -0.88 2.44 2.46 1.87 1.9
2 0.6 12.03 15.42 12.79 11.28
3 -11.2 -8.76 -20.16 -3.61 -5.75
4 -357.34 -32.45 -16.85 -1.24 -8.03
5 -40.22 81.63 67.1 49.87 52.44
6 -0.34 -0.21 0.17 0.15 0.09
7 -11.2 -16.72 -152.01 -1.31 -7.98
8 -2.54 -2.75 -1.34 -1.06 -0.91
9 -1.09 0.52 1.8 1.5 1.26
10 -2.23 4.24 0.78 0.77 0.64
11 -1.06 -0.59 -0.3 -0.54 -0.63
12 -8.78 12.46 12.45 12.4 14.04
13 -5.72 2.18 1.98 1.96 1.69
14 -1.97 -1.28 -0.24 -0.15 0.55
15 6 11.35 10.77 8.9 10.2
16 -0.57 -0.32 -0.6 -0.43 -2.2
17 -0.04 -0.07 -2.04 -0.06 0
18 -0.78 0.76 1.08 1.19 0.64
19 -1.66 -0.84 0 -0.28 -0.03
20 -4.41 3.38 2.22 1.34 1.43
21 -2.71 2.15 5.38 2.23 1.4
22 -17.99 1.13 2.49 1.53 0.42
23 -11.69 15.14 10.63 16.07 17.21
24 0 -1.58 6.5 -0.28 -1.16
25 -0.08 -0.07 -0.12 -0.04 -0.12
26 -0.51 0.23 0.3 -0.26 -0.16
27 1.51 0.94 33.61 1.61 21.67
28 9.46 -8.14 4.81 10.14 14.82
29 -2.99 -0.21 5.01 0.34 0.09
30 -1.25 0.27 0.56 0.04 0.37
31 -0.28 -0.19 0.1 -0.23 0.01
32 -0.99 0.22 1.1 0.8 1.55
33 0.16 1.49 1.95 1.48 0.59
34 0.14 1.35 1.71 0 1.26
35 -12.6 3.41 4.59 4.03 3.64

58 | P a g e
36 -3.44 3.59 5.27 4.3 1.99
37 -13.1 -1.71 -2.45 -3.1 -3.07
38 1.26 3.41 17.5 21.07 16.18
39 -0.74 -2.74 -2.08 1.06 1.73
40 -4.17 3.72 3.87 3.38 1.63
41 -2.82 0.29 -18.41 0.19 0
42 -4.55 1.03 1.26 8.98 7.9
43 0.02 -0.99 -0.7 -0.77 -6.11
44 -3.84 -2.17 -2.95 -103.44 -2.72
45 0 -0.11 -0.09 0.24 0.16

Table No. 5.59 Descriptive Statistics of Earning Per Share for the period
2017 to 2021

Anova: Single Factor


Year Count Sum Average Variance
2021 45.00 -516.63 -11.48 2836.21
2020 45.00 87.46 1.94 199.07
2019 45.00 2.53 0.06 703.22
2018 45.00 53.43 1.19 329.72
2017 45.00 149.91 3.33 96.64

Figure 5.5 Statement of Earnings Per Share

Statement of Earnings Per Share

100%
90%
832.97
80%
70%
60%
50%
40% 183253.97 220.00 1.93 0.11 2.41
30%
20%
1610.65

10%
6442.614.00
0%
SSdfMSFP-valueF crit

Between GroupsWithin Groups

59 | P a g e
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 5 Years.
H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 5 Years.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.93 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.41 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Research Scholar
concluded that there is no significant difference in Earning Per Share vof
Hotels listed on BSE during the period 2017 to 2021.

Table No. 5.60 Descriptive Statistics of Earning Per Share for the period
2017 to 2018
2018 2017

Mean 1.19 Mean 3.33


Standard Error 2.71 Standard Error 1.47
Median 0.77 Median 0.59
Standard Deviation 18.16 Standard Deviation 9.83
Sample Variance 329.72 Sample Variance 96.64
Count 45.00 Count 45.00
Confidence Confidence
Level(95.0%) 5.46 Level(95.0%) 2.95

z-Test: Two Sample for Means

2018 2017
Mean 1.19 3.33
Known Variance 329.72 96.64
Observations 45.00 45.00
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0.00
z -0.70
P(Z<=z) two-tail 0.49
z Critical two-tail 1.96

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2


Years. H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2
Years.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value (0.70) is less than Z
critical value (1.96). Research Scholar concluded that there is no
significant difference in Earning Per Share of Hotels listed on BSE during
the period 2017 to 2018.

60 | P a g e
Table No.5.61 Statement of Cash Earnings per Share of Hotels for the
period 2017 to 2021
Hotels 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
1 -0.18 3.25 3.25 2.63 2.7
2 3.28 14.61 19.7 17.5 16.77
3 -10.33 -7.88 -19.27 -2.01 -4.13
4 -348.69 -23.24 -6.95 9.02 0
5 13.12 130.72 107.32 81.97 88.2
6 0.05 0.21 0.58 0.56 0.51
7 -11.11 -16.64 -149.98 3.99 0.47
8 -1.56 -1.74 -0.3 0.04 0.27
9 -0.74 1.02 2.21 1.9 1.67
10 0 0 0 0 2.12
11 -0.93 -0.46 -0.12 -0.32 -0.32
12 -3.21 17.7 17.13 17.03 18.7
13 -3.57 4.53 4.14 3.87 3.62
14 -1.23 -0.38 0.46 0.71 0.12
15 6.12 11.47 10.89 9.02 10.33
16 -0.36 3.26 -1.73 1.62 2.14
17 -0.04 -0.07 -2.04 -0.06 -0.03
18 -0.04 1.76 2.15 2.49 2.24
19 -1 -0.11 0.84 0 0
20 -2.7 5.09 3.64 2.52 2.96
21 -2.39 3.46 5.75 3.59 2.32
22 -9.13 9.73 0 0 10.69
23 -7.27 19.12 14.9 20.53 0
24 0.11 -1.46 6.63 -0.16 -1.03
25 0 0 -0.12 0 -0.09
26 -0.12 0.54 0.71 0.17 0.39
27 3.53 12.24 37.4 20.05 0
28 17.27 -0.49 8.67 14.25 21.67
29 -1.38 1.34 6.6 1.88 1.48
30 0.54 2.06 2.3 1.91 1.72
31 -0.22 -0.13 -0.36 0 0.07
32 0.32 1.58 2.23 1.59 2.41
33 0.7 2.05 2.58 2.1 1.2
34 0.3 2.94 3.05 2.68 2.51
35 -9.41 6.34 6.07 5.63 0
36 -0.32 7.43 8.18 7.33 5.72
37 2.48 15.42 9.66 9.26 0
38 3.22 5.83 31.01 34.33 30.47
39 0.61 -1.64 -0.51 2.67 3.46
40 -4.17 3.72 3.87 3.38 1.63
41 -2.13 1.34 -17.47 1.87 4.39

61 | P a g e
42 2.05 8.03 4.99 12.39 11.09
43 0.55 -0.44 -0.13 -0.2 -5.5
44 -1.83 -0.06 -0.78 -101.47 -1.32
45 0.17 0.18 0.28 0.22 0.39

Figure 5.6 Statement of Cash Earnings Per Share

Statements of CEPS

444.64
2718.79 420.29 869.94
Variance 205.42

-8.21 5.382.834.37 5.38


Average

-369.64 242.23 127.43 196.48242.01


Sum

45.0045.0045.0045.0045.00
Count

-40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

20212020201920182017

62 | P a g e
Table No. 5.62 Descriptive Statistics of Cash Earning Per Share for the
period 2017 to 2021

ONE WAY ANOVA ANALYSIS


Source of
Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 6005.83 4.00 1501.46 1.61 0.17 2.41

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 5 Years.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 5 Years.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.61 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.41 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Research Scholar
concluded that there is no significant difference in Net Profits of Hotels
listed on BSE during the period 2017 to 2021.

Table No. 5.63 Descriptive Statistics of Cash Earning Per Share for the
period 2017 to 2018

2018 2017

Mean 4.37 Mean 5.38


Standard Error 3.14 Standard Error 2.14
Median 2.10 Median 1.63
Standard Deviation 21.09 Standard Deviation 14.33
Sample Variance 444.64 Sample Variance 205.42
Count 45.00 Count 45.00
Confidence
Confidence Level(95.0%) 6.34 Level(95.0%) 4.31

z-Test: Two Sample for Means


2018 2017
Mean 4.37 5.38
Known Variance 444.64 205.42
Observations 45.00 45.00
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0.00
z -0.27
P(Z<=z) two-tail 0.79
z Critical two-tail 1.96

63 | P a g e
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2
Years. H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2
Years.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value 0.27) is less than Z
critical value 1.96. Research Scholar concluded that there is no significant
difference in Cash Earning Per Share of Hotels listed on BSE during the
period 2017 to 2018.

Table No.5.64 Statement of Operating Profit Margin of Hotels for the


period 2017 to 2021
Hotels 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
1 -7.24 25.7 25.11 26.39 30.8
2 12.17 27.27 28.38 23.67 24.17
3 -894.16 0 0 0 0
4 -809.08 22.08 29.27 42.1 -2.46
5 3.97 32.93 30.44 25.61 31.03
6 8.67 10.62 24.2 23.95 26.06
7 0 0 -70 21.77 -0.01
8 8.65 9.78 18.19 17.63 18.36
9 -26.77 19.04 31.43 29.93 27.17
10 4.47 48.29 19.94 20 21.21
11 -37.65 10.49 21.1 7.53 3.76
12 -19.38 23.86 27.65 27.75 30.75
13 -65.32 21.68 21.58 22.4 19.79
14 -127.3 -9.12 3 14 1.76
15 276.33 147.84 141.36 138.34 146.82
16 -106.29 -5.05 -18.03 25.87 27.18
17 0 0 0 0 0
18 15.26 19.86 21.67 23.73 31.17
19 -52.94 2.97 8.97 6.1 8.49
20 -12.5 32.04 26.8 24.34 25.43
21 -9.04 15.11 19.97 15.29 5.41
22 -6.98 28.97 31.38 35.25 37.14
23 22.8 45.07 35.77 46.06 50.81
24 213.55 -2588.95 7793.33 -411.54 -711.46
25 -247.92 -52.8 0 0 0
26 -2.32 5.97 6.42 6.19 5.14
27 70.15 63.56 98.25 55.83 54.55
28 34.8 24.73 16.51 24.61 24.02
29 -21.23 16.62 45.74 18.8 17.74
30 18.95 20.8 21.09 19.71 21.92
31 -588.75 -34.91 -3.36 -13.78 20.34
32 12.41 13.01 17.86 12.41 16.62

64 | P a g e
33 28.36 23.65 26.71 25.24 24.99
34 4 21.68 21.4 17.74 22.39
35 -45.28 25.14 23.76 24.58 22.14
36 -1.89 16.41 18.43 15.88 15.66
37 25.88 22.35 16.49 15.89 19.19
38 59.12 40.79 47.24 46.47 46.54
39 25.65 -3.49 17.23 39.56 68.63
40 0.49 24.11 24.11 25.76 24.39
41 -35.28 14.06 -52.2 -3.89 19.92
42 22.69 30.35 16.75 39.16 23.09
43 1310 -38.53 -3.06 4.31 12.6
44 -51.36 2.71 -0.03 -476.8 24.04
45 32.2 15.21 14.37 7.74 12.67

Table No. 5.65 Descriptive Statistics of Operating Profit Margin for the
period 2017 to 2021
Anova: Single Factor
Year Count Sum Average Variance
2021 45.00 -958.11 -21.29 84968.78
-
2020 45.00 1808.10 -40.18 151832.64
2019 45.00 8645.22 192.12 1343931.02
2018 45.00 111.58 2.48 10041.15
2017 45.00 349.96 7.78 12592.76

Figure 5.7 Statement of Operating Profit Margin

Statement of Operating Profit Margin

F crit 2.41

P-value 0.30

F 1.23

MS 394563.54 320673.27

df 4.00 220.00

SS 1578254.14 70548119.42

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Between GroupsWithin Groups

65 | P a g e
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 5 Years.
H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 5 Years.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.23 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.41 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Research Scholar
concluded that there is no significant difference in Operating Profit
Margin of Hotels listed on BSE during the period 2017 to 2021.
Table No. 5.66 Descriptive Statistics of Operating Profit Margin for the
period 2017 to 2018

2018 2017

Mean 2.48 Mean 7.78


Standard Error 14.94 Standard Error 16.73
Median 21.77 Median 21.92
Standard Deviation 100.21 Standard Deviation 112.22
Sample Variance 10041.15 Sample Variance 12592.76
Count 45.00 Count 45.00
Confidence
Confidence Level(95.0%) 30.11 Level(95.0%) 33.71

z-Test: Two Sample for Means


2018 2017
Mean 2.48 7.78
Known
Variance 10041.15 12592.76
Observations 45.00 45.00
Hypothesized
Mean
Difference 0.00
z -0.24
P(Z<=z) two-
tail 0.81
z Critical two-
tail 1.96

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2


Years. H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2
Years.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value (0.24)is less than Z
critical value 1.96. P Value is also more than 0.05 i.e 0.81. Research
Scholar concluded that there is no significant difference in Operating
Profit Margin of Hotels listed on BSE during the period 2017 to 2018.

66 | P a g e
Table No.5.67 Statement of Net Profit Margin of Hotels for the period
2017 to 2021
Hotels 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
1 -14.86 16.06 16.18 13.82 14.73
2 2.35 15.06 17.19 14.43 13.1
3 - 0 0 0 0
3272.73
4 -957.71 -25.01 -11.98 -0.88 -6.2
5 -21.57 16.68 14.62 13.67 13.7
6 -24.48 -8.17 5.4 5.29 3.1
7 0 0 -368.5 -1.23 -4.5
8 -89.17 -35.21 -10.21 -7.28 -5.73
9 -60.58 5.37 15.75 12.94 10
10 -32.07 31.54 5.84 5.93 5
11 -201.4 -35.87 -14.74 -27.39 -40.15
12 -26.37 15.24 14.36 14.34 1
13 -79.3 9.22 7.34 8.31 7
14 -159.33 -22.22 -3.87 -1.48 -9.38
15 228.8 114.71 110.27 101.78 118
16 -189.9 132.97 -77.04 -3.23 -14.65
17 0 0 0 0 0
18 -13.98 4.87 6.11 7.18 4.5
19 -88.05 -7.88 -0.04 -0.65 0.34
20 -46.31 14.63 9.48 5.72 5.94
21 -15.48 6.68 12.05 6.87 2.5
22 -70.45 1.8 3.94 2.72 0.6
23 -53.41 19.91 13.03 22.48 25.9
24 0.13 -3022.1 10011.56 -757.69 -7
25 -185.42 -27.97 0 0 0
26 -12.25 2.32 2.64 -2.86 -2.12
27 4.62 50.72 56.28 28.87 35.5
28 15.3 -11.08 6.95 12.63 12
29 -46.1 -1.31 25.89 1.68 0.46
30 -18.66 1.83 3.89 3.53 3.57
31 -786.25 -57.44 -13.74 -30.42 1.14
32 -8.83 0.99 4.77 4.18 7
33 3.65 11.74 14.24 11.42 5
34 -6.38 10.12 10.26 1.45 9
35 -72.24 7.94 11.21 10.75 10.85

67 | P a g e
36 -20.88 6.36 8.74 7.09 3.4
37 -28.92 -0.86 -1.42 -2.21 -2.64
38 20.33 20.88 21.3 25.57 1
39 -14.53 -40.88 -23.38 9.9 25
40 -28.09 7.63 7.68 7.29 3.84
41 -55.76 2.57 -67.6 0.46 -4.83
42 -27.8 3.39 3.45 20.3 11.74
43 177.5 -96.62 -35.09 -28.88 -1
44 -73.74 -11.3 -14.44 -523.26 -13
45 0.31 1 -0.77 -0.32 5.4

Figure 5.8 Statement of Net Profit Margin

Statement of NPM

100% 19149.54
2017 45.00 427.49

80%
2018 45.00

60% 2233319.02
201945.00 249.11 5.54
40%
2020 45.00
9797.60 217.72
20%
204682.06
2021 45.00
264310.34
0%
Year Count Sum Average Variance
-6350.01 -141.11
-20%

-2871.69 -63.82
-40%
-1007.18 -22.38

-60%

Series1Series2Series3Series4Series5

68 | P a g e
Table No. 5.68 Descriptive Statistics of Net Profit Margin for the period
2017 to 2021

ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 3236267.25 4.00 809066.81 1.49 0.21 2.41

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 5 Years.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 5 Years.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.49 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.41 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Research
Scholar concluded that there is no significant difference in Net Profit
Margin of Hotels listed on BSE during the period 2017 to 2021.

Table No. 5.69 Descriptive Statistics of Net Profit Margin for the period
2017 to 2018

2018 (After GST) 2017 (Before GST)

Mean -22.38 Mean 5.54


Standard Error 20.63 Standard Error 3.08
Median 4.18 Median 3.10
Standard Deviation 138.38 Standard Deviation 20.68
Sample Variance 19149.54 Sample Variance 427.49
Count 45.00 Count 45.00
Confidence
Confidence Level(95.0%) 41.57 Level(95.0%) 6.21

z-Test: Two Sample for Means


2018 2017
Mean -22.38 5.54
Known Variance 19149.54 427.49
Observations 45.00 45.00
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0.00
z -1.34
P(Z<=z) two-tail 0.18
z Critical two-tail 1.96

69 | P a g e
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2
Years. H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2
Years.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value (1.34) is less than Z
critical value 1.96. P Value is also greater than 0.05 i.e 0.18. Research
Scholar concluded that there is no significant difference in Net Profit
Margin of Hotels listed on BSE during the period 2017 to 2028.

70 | P a g e
Questionnaire relating to General Public:
Data was collected from 100 respondents of General public of Mumbai,
Thane, Kalyan, Ambernath and Ulhasnagar cities. Data was analysed
through Anova (F) test and Z test.

Figure 5.9 Prices of food have gone up due to Goods and Service Tax

Prices of Food have gone up due to


GST

100%

90%

50 92 1.84 0.67
80%
70%

60%

50%

40%
50 95 1.9 0.79
30%
20%

10%

0%
Count Sum Average Variance
Female 50 92 1.84 0.67
Male 50 95 1.9 0.79

MaleFemale

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 0.09 1 0.09 0.12 0.73 3.94

H0: Mean of Male = Mean of Female


H1: Mean of Male ≠ Mean of Female
Data collected from Male and Female. F value 0.12 is less than F critical
value 3.94. Hence, there is no significant difference between Mean of Male

71 | P a g e
and Mean of Female. Hence, H0 has failed to reject. Researcher has
concluded that prices of food have gone up due to GST.

Table No.5.70 Descriptive Statistics of Prices of food have gone up due to


Goods and Service Tax (Genderwise)
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 15.00 31.00 2.07 0.92
Thane 15.00 34.00 2.27 1.50
Kalyan 15.00 28.00 1.87 0.55
Other cities 15.00 29.00 1.93 1.07
Source of
Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 1.40 3.00 0.47 0.46 0.71 2.77
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.46 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.77 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher has
concluded that prices of food have gone up due to GST.
Figure 5.10 Quality of food served in the hotels has declined due to
GST (Citywise)

Quality of food served in the hotels


has declined due toOGtheSr TCities,
Mumbai, 51.00 50.00
Thane, 48.00
Kalyan , 40.00

Other C ities,
Mumbai, 15.0 0 Thane, 15
.00 Kalyan , 15.00 15.00

M umbai, 3.40 Thane, 3.20 Ka ly an , 2.67 Oth er Cities, 3.33


M umbai, 1.40 Thane, 1.17 Ka lyan , 1.10 O ther Cities, 1.10
Mumbai Thane Kalyan Other Cities
Count 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00
Sum 51.00 48.00 40.00 50.00
Average 3.40 3.20 2.67 3.33
Variance 1.40 1.17 1.10 1.10

CountSumAverageVariance

72 | P a g e
ANOVA

Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F


crit
Between Groups 4.98 3.00 1.66 1.40 0.25 2.77

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.40 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.77 and P-value is also more than 0.05. . Hence, Research
scholar has concluded that quality of food service in the hotel has declined
due to GST

Figure 5.11 Quality of food served in the has declined due to GST
(Genderwise)

Quality of food served in the hotels has declined


180.00
due to GST
158.00
160.00
147.00
140.00

120.00

100.00

80.00

60.00
50.0 50.00
0

40.00

20.00
3.16 2.94 1.16 1.12
0.00
Count Sum Average Variance
Male 50.00 158.00 3.16 1.16
Female 50.00 147.00 2.94 1.12
Male Female

Quality of food served in the hotels has declined due to Goods and Service Tax
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F
crit
Between Groups 1.21 1.00 1.21 1.06 0.31 3.94
73 | P a g e
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.

74 | P a g e
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.06 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.94 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Hence, Research
scholar has concluded that quality of food service in the hotel has declined
due to GST.

Quality of services provided in the hotels have dropped due to Goods


and Service Tax
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 15.00 53.00 3.53 1.27
Thane 15.00 48.00 3.20 1.31
Kalyan 15.00 42.00 2.80 1.03
Other Cities 15.00 47.00 3.13 1.12

Figure No. 5.12 Quality of Services provided in the hotels have dropped
due to GST (Citywise)

Quality of services provided in the hotels have


dropped due to GST
100%

90%

80%
1.18
70%
60%

66.27 56.00
50% 1.15 0.34 2.77

40%
30%
1.36
20%
10%

4.073.00
0%
SSdf MS F P-value F crit
Within Groups 66.2756.00 1.18
Between Groups 4.073.00 1.36
1.15 0.34 2.77

Between GroupsWithin Groups

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.

75 | P a g e
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.15 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.77 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Hence, Research
scholar has concluded that quality of services in the hotel has declined
due to GST.

Quality of services provided in the hotels have dropped due to Goods and
Service Tax (GST)
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Male 50.00 165.00 3.30 1.03
Female 50.00 151.00 3.02 1.08

Figure 5.13 Quality of Services provided in the hotels have dropped due to
GST (Genderwise)

Quality of services provided in the


hotels have dropped due to GST

100%
90%
80% 1.06
70%
60%
50%
40% 103.48 98.00 1.86 0.18 3.94
30%
20%
10% 1.96
0%

1.96 1.00
SS df MS F P-value F crit
Within Groups 103.48 98.00 1.06
Between Groups 1.96 1.00 1.96
1.86 0.18 3.94

Between GroupsWithin Groups

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.86 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.94 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Hence, Research

76 | P a g e
scholar has concluded that quality of services in the hotel has declined
due to GST.

Prices of hotel rooms have gone up after implementation of Goods and Service
Tax
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 15.00 33.00 2.20 1.46
Thane 15.00 31.00 2.07 1.78
Kalyan 15.00 28.00 1.87 0.55
Other cities 15.00 27.00 1.80 0.60

Figure 5.14 Prices of hotel rooms have gone up after implementation


of Goods and Service Tax (Citywise)

Prices of hotel rooms have gone up after


implementation of GST
F crit 2.77
P-value 0.71
F 0.46
MS 1.10
0.51
df 56.00
3.00
SS 61.47
1.52

0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.0060.0070.00
SS df MS F P-value F crit
Within Groups 61.47 56.00 1.10
Between Groups 1.52 3.00 0.51
0.46 0.71 2.77

Within GroupsBetween Groups

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.46 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.77 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Hence, Research
scholar has concluded that prices of hotels rooms have gone up after
implementation of GST.

77 | P a g e
Prices of hotel rooms have gone up after implementation of Goods and Service
Tax

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Male 50.00 96.00 1.92 0.73
Female 50.00 93.00 1.86 0.61

Figure 5.15 Prices of hotel rooms have gone up after implementation


of Goods and Service Tax (Genderwise)

0.09

1.00 0.09
0.13

0.71

3.94

SSdfMSFP-valueF crit

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.13 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.94 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Hence, Research
scholar has concluded that prices of hotels rooms have gone up after
implementation of GST.

78 | P a g e
Benefit of Goods and Service Tax (Input Tax Credit) hotel owner are passing
to customers.
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 15.00 48.00 3.20 1.17
Thane 15.00 44.00 2.93 1.50
Kalyan 15.00 44.00 2.93 1.07
Other cities 15.00 51.00 3.40 1.40

Figure 5.16 Benefit of Goods and Service Tax (Input Tax Credit) hotel
owner are passing to customers (Citywise)

Benefit of Input Tax Credit hotel owner are passing to


customers
F crit 0 2.77
0
P-value 0.62
F 0
0.60
MS 1.28
0.77
df 56.00
3.00
SS 71.87
2.32

0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.0060.0070.0080.00
SS df MS F P-value F crit
Within Groups 71.87 56.00 1.28
Between Groups 2.32 3.00 0.77 0.60 0.62 2.77

Within GroupsBetween Groups

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.60 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.77 and P-value is also more than 0.05 i.e 0.62. Hence,
Research scholar has concluded that benefit of Input Tax Credit hotel
owner are passing to customers.

79 | P a g e
Figure 5.17 Benefit of Goods and Service Tax (Input Tax Credit) hotel
owner are passing to customers (Genderwise)

Benefit of Input Tax Credit hotel owner


are passing to customers
100%
90%
80%
70% 1.07
60% 56.00 176.00 3.14
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0% 1.32
56.00 171.00 3.05

Count Sum Average Variance


Female 56.00 176.00 3.14 1.07
Male 56.00 171.00 3.05 1.32

ANOVA
Source of SS df MS F P- F crit
Variation value
Between Groups 0.22 1.00 0.22 0.19 0.67 3.93

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.19 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.93 and P-value is also more than 0.05 i.e. 0.67. Benefit of
Input Tax Credit hotel owner are passing to customers.

80 | P a g e
Figure 5.18 Customers visits to hotels for food have gone down after
implementation of Goods and Services Tax (Citywise)

Customers visits to hotels for food have gone down


after implementation of GST

Variance 1.21 1.71 0.95 1.67

Average 2.93 3.00 2.33 3.33

Sum 44.00 45.00 35.00 50.00

Count 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Count Sum Average Variance


Mumbai 15.00 44.00 2.93 1.21
Thane 15.00 45.00 3.00 1.71
Kalyan 15.00 35.00 2.33 0.95
Other cities 15.00 50.00 3.33 1.67

MumbaiThaneKalyanOther cities

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F
crit
Between Groups 7.80 3.00 2.60 1.88 0.14 2.77

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.88 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.77 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that Customers visits to hotels for food have gone down after
implementation of Goods and Services Tax.

81 | P a g e
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Male 50.00 139.00 2.78 0.87
Female 50.00 132.00 2.64 1.30

Figure 5.19 Customers visits to hotels for food have gone down after
implementation of Goods and Services Tax (Genderwise)

Visits to hotels for food have gone down


after implementation of GST
100%

90%

80%

70% 1.08
60%

50% 106.10 98.00 0.45 0.50 3.94

40%

30%

20%
0.49
10%

0% 0.49 1.00
SS df MS F P-value F crit
Within Groups 106.10 98.00 1.08
Between Groups 0.49 1.00 0.49
0.45 0.50 3.94

Between GroupsWithin Groups

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.45 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.94 and P-value is also more than 0.05 i.e 0.50.
Researcher concluded that Customers visits to hotels for food have gone
down after implementation of Goods and Services Tax.

82 | P a g e
Figure 5.20 In Post GST era, your orders for foods from hotels have
reduced due to Goods and Service Tax (Citywise)

In Post GST era, your orders for foods from hotels


have reduced due to Goods and Service Tax
45
42.00
41.00
40

35 34.00

30

25 24.00

20

15 15 15 15
15

10

5 2.802.73 2.27 2.74 2.21


1.60 1.92
1.11
0
Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 15 42.00 2.80 2.74
Thane 15 41.00 2.73 1.92
Kalyan 15 24.00 1.60 1.11
Other cities 15 34.00 2.27 2.21

MumbaiThaneKalyanOther cities

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F
P-value F
crit
Between Groups 13.78 3.00 4.59 2.30 0.09 2.77
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 2.30 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.77 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that In Post GST era, customers orders for foods from hotels
have reduced due to Goods and Service Tax.

83 | P a g e
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Male 50.00 116.00 2.32 2.39
Female 50.00 112.00 2.24 2.02

Figure 5.21 In Post GST era, your orders for foods from hotels have
reduced due to Goods and Service Tax (Genderwise)

In Post GST era, your orders for foods from


hotels have reduced due to Goods and Service Tax

F crit 3.94

P-value 0.79

F 0.07

MS 0.16 2.20

df 1.00 98.00

SS 0.16 216.00

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 0.16 1.00 0.16 0.07 0.79 3.94
Within Groups 216.00 98.00 2.20

Between GroupsWithin Groups

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.07 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.94 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that In Post GST era, customers orders for foods from hotels
have reduced due to Goods and Service Tax.

84 | P a g e
Figure 5.22 In Post GST era, your family has reduced vacation/business
trips due to high price of hotels rooms (Citywise)

Mumbai

32.00
2.13

3.69

1.55
15.00

CountSumAverageVariance

Thane

37.00
2.47

4.59

2.12
15.00

CountSumAverageVariance

85 | P a g e
Kalyan

19.00

1.27
1.48

15.00 0.21

CountSumAverageVariance

Other cities

33.00
2.20

4.51

2.31

15.00

CountSumAverageVariance

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F
crit
Between Groups 12.18 3.00 4.06 2.62 0.06 2.77

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 2.62 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.77 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that in Post GST era, families have reduced vacation/business
trips due to high price of hotels rooms.

86 | P a g e
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Male 50.00 113.00 2.26 1.87
Female 50.00 98.00 1.96 1.75

Figure 5.23 In Post GST era, your family has reduced vacation/business
trips due to high price of hotels rooms (Genderwise)

In Post GST era, your family has reduced


vacation/business trips due to high
price of hotel rooms

SS
1.24, 11% df MS F
2.25, 21% 3.94, 36% P-value
F crit
4.21, 38%
1.00, 9%

0.27, 2%
2.25, 21%

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.24 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.94 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that in Post GST era, families have reduced vacation/business
trips due to high price of hotel rooms.

87 | P a g e
Figure 5.24 Cost of food has increased due to GST, hence price of food has
also increased in hotels (Citywise)

Cost of food has increased due to GST, hence


price of food has also increased in hotels

35.00

30.00

25.00
25.00
20.00 32.00
15.00 21.00
15.00 15.00
15.00 25.00
10.00 15.00 1.67
1.10 Other Cities
1.40
5.00 0.26 Kalyan
2.13
1.55 Thane
0.00 1.67
1.10
Count Mumbai
Sum
Average
Variance

Count Sum Average Variance


Mumbai 15.00 25.00 1.67 1.10
Thane 15.00 32.00 2.13 1.55
Kalyan 15.00 21.00 1.40 0.26
Other Cities 15.00 25.00 1.67 1.10

MumbaiThaneKalyanOther Cities

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F
crit
Between Groups 4.18 3.00 1.39 1.39 0.25 2.77
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.39 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.77 and P-value is also more than 0.05.Researcher
concluded that Cost of food has increased due to GST, hence price of food
has also increased in hotels.

88 | P a g e
Figure 5.25 Cost of food has increased due to GST, hence price of food has
also increased in hotels (Citywise)

Cost of food has increased due to GST,


hence price of food has also increased in hotels

100.00
90.00 84.00
80.00
70.00

60.0050.00
50.00
90.00
40.00
30.00
50.00
20.00
10.00 1.68 0.71
0.00 1.80 0.78
Count Sum Average Variance
Male 50.00 90.00 1.80 0.78
Female 50.00 84.00 1.68 0.71

MaleFemale

ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 0.36 1.00 0.36 0.48 0.49 3.94
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =0.48 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.94 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that Cost of food has increased due to GST, hence price of food
has also increased in hotels.

89 | P a g e
Cost of accommodation of hotels rooms has increased due to GST, hence
rent of hotels has gone up

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 14.00 19.00 1.36 0.25
Thane 14.00 31.00 2.21 1.72
Kalyan 14.00 22.00 1.57 0.26
Other cities 14.00 24.00 1.71 1.14

Figure 5.26 Cost of accommodation of hotels rooms has increased due to


GST, hence rent of hotels has gone up (Citywise)

Cost of accommodation of hotels rooms has


increased due to GST, hence rent of hotels has gone up

F CRIT
2.78

P-VALUE
0.10

F
2.20

MS0.84
1.86
52.00
DF 3.00

43.86
SS
5.57

0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00


SS df MS F P-value F crit
Within Groups 43.86 52.00 0.84
Between Groups 5.57 3.00 1.86 2.20 0.10 2.78

Within GroupsBetween Groups

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 2.20 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.78 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher

90 | P a g e
concluded that Cost of accommodation of hotels rooms has increased due
to GST, hence rent of hotels has gone up.

Figure 5.27 Cost of accommodation of hotels rooms has increased due to


GST, hence rent of hotels has gone up (Citywise)

COST OF ACCOMMODATION OF
HOTELS ROOMS HAS
INCREASED DUE TO GST, HENCE RENT OF HOTELS HAS GONE UP

MaleFemale

50.00 86.00 1.72 0.70

50.00 85.00 1.70 0.58

Count Sum Average Variance


Female 50.00 86.00 1.72 0.70
Male 50.00 85.00 1.70 0.58

ANOVA
Source of SS df MS F P- F crit
Variation value
Between Groups 0.01 1.00 0.01 0.02 0.90 3.94
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.02 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.94 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
inferred that Cost of accommodation of hotels rooms has increased due to
GST, hence rent of hotels has gone up.

91 | P a g e
Figure 5.28 Goods and Service Tax rates on sale of food in hotels and rent
on hotel rooms must be reduced (Citywise)

Goods and Service Tax rates on sale


of food in hotels and rent on hotel rooms must be redu

35.00 32.00
30.00
25.00 24.0205.00
23.00

20.00
15.0105.0105.0105.00
15.00
10.00

5.00
1.532.131.601.67 1.121.410.690.67

0.00
Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 15.00 23.00 1.53 1.12
Thane 15.00 32.00 2.13 1.41
Kalyan 15.00 24.00 1.60 0.69
Other cities 15.00 25.00 1.67 0.67

MumbaiThaneKalyanOther cities

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F
crit
Between Groups 3.33 3.00 1.11 1.14 0.34 2.77

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.14 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.77 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
construed that GST rates on sale of food in hotels and rent on hotel rooms
must be reduced.

92 | P a g e
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Male 50.00 80.00 1.60 0.86
Female 50.00 84.00 1.68 0.59

Figure 5.29 Goods and Service Tax rates on sale of food in hotels and rent
on hotel rooms must be reduced (Genderwise)

Goods and Service Tax rates on sale of


food in hotels and rent on hotel rooms must be reduced

100.00 98.00
90.00
80.00 70.88
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.000.16 0.16
0.00 1.00
0.72 0.220
SS 0.640
df 3.94
MS 0
F
P-value
F crit

SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 0.16 1.00 0.16 0.22 0.64 3.94
Within Groups 70.88 98.00 0.72

Between GroupsWithin Groups

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.22 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.94 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
construed that GST rates on sale of food in hotels and rent on hotel rooms
must be reduced.

93 | P a g e
Mumbai Hotel industry has affected badly in Covid 19 Pandemic
(Citywise)

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 15.00 26.00 1.73 1.50
Thane 15.00 30.00 2.00 2.14
Kalyan 15.00 23.00 1.53 0.27
Other cities 15.00 19.00 1.27 0.21

Figure 5.30 Mumbai Hotel industry has affected badly in Covid 19


Pandemic (Citywise)

Mumbai Hotel industry has affected badly in Covid 19


Pandemic

F crit 2.77

P-value 0.25

F 1.40

1.03
MS 1.44

56.00
df 3.00

57.60
SS 4.33

0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00

SS df MS F P-value F crit
Within Groups 57.60 56.00 1.03
Between Groups 4.33 3.00 1.44 1.40 0.25 2.77

Within GroupsBetween Groups

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.40 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.77 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher

94 | P a g e
concluded that Mumbai Hotel industry has affected badly in Covid 19
Pandemic.
Figure 5.31 Mumbai Hotel industry has affected badly in Covid 19
Pandemic (Genderwise)

MUMBAI HOTEL INDUSTRY HAS AFFECTED BADLY IN COVID 19 PANDEMIC

MaleFemale

71.00

50.00

77.00
50.00
1.42 0.25
1.54
0.62
Count Sum Average Variance
Female 50.00 71.00 1.42 0.25
Male 50.00 77.00 1.54 0.62

ANOVA
Source of SS df MS F P- F crit
Variation value
Between Groups 0.36 1.00 0.36 0.83 0.37 3.94

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.83 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.94 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that Mumbai Hotel industry has affected badly in Covid 19
Pandemic.

95 | P a g e
Are you ordering food from hotels at home in Covid 19 Pandemic period?
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 15.00 35.00 2.33 2.52
Thane 15.00 35.00 2.33 1.52
Kalyan 15.00 32.00 2.13 2.41
Other cities 15.00 43.00 2.87 2.12

Figure 5.32 Are you ordering food from hotels at home in Covid 19
Pandemic period (Citywise)

Are you ordering food from hotels at home in


Covid 19 Pandemic period

F crit 2.77

P-value 0.56

F 0.69

MS 1.48 2.15

df 3 .00 56.00

SS 4 .45 120.13

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 4.45 3.00 1.48 0.69 0.56 2.77
Within Groups 120.13 56.00 2.15

Between GroupsWithin Groups

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.

96 | P a g e
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.69 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.77 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that customers were ordering food from hotels at home in
Covid 19 Pandemic period.

Figure 5.33 Are you ordering food from hotels at home in Covid 19
Pandemic period (Genderwise)

Are you ordering food from hotels at


home in Covid 19 Pandemic period
100%

90%

80%
56.00 133.00 2.38 1.98
70%

60%

50%

40%
56.00 131.00 2.34 1.83
30%

20%

10% Count Sum Average Variance


Female 56.00 133.00 2.38 1.98
0%
Male 56.00 131.00 2.34 1.83

MaleFemale

ANOVA
Source of SS df MS F P- F crit
Variation value
Between Groups 0.04 1.00 0.04 0.02 0.89 3.93

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.

97 | P a g e
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.02 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.93 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that customers were ordering food from hotels at home in
Covid 19 Pandemic period.

Figure 5.34 Visits to hotels for food have gone down in Covid 19
Pandemic period

WHETHER YOUR VISITS TO


HOTELS FOR FOOD HAVE GONE DOWN IN COVID 19 PANDEMIC PERI

60.00
CountSumAverageVariance
1.46
50.00 2.20
1.70
1.87 1.67
40.00 1.67
0.60
1.20
30.00 33.00
28.00
25.00
18.00
20.00

10.00
15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00

0.00
Mumbai Thane Kalyan Other cities
Variance 1.70 1.67 1.46 0.60
Average 1.87 1.67 2.20 1.20
Sum 28.00 25.00 33.00 18.00
Count 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P- F
value crit
Between Groups 7.87 3.00 2.62 1.94 0.13 2.77

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.

98 | P a g e
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.94 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.77 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that Customers visits to hotels for food have gone down in
Covid 19 Pandemic period.

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Male 56.00 104.00 1.86 1.72
Female 56.00 85.00 1.52 0.95

Figure 5.35 Visits to hotels for food have gone down in Covid 19 Pandemic
period

WHETHER YOUR VISITS TO HOTELS


FOR FOOD HAVE GONE DOWN IN COVID 19 PAND

160.00
146.84
140.00

120.00 110.00

100.00

80.00

60.00

40.00

20.00
3.22 1.00 3.221.33 2.41 0.12 3.93
0.00 MS 3.22 P-value 0.12
SSdf 1.33 F F crit
Between Groups3.221.00 2.41 3.93
Within Groups146.84110.00

Between GroupsWithin Groups

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.

99 | P a g e
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 2.41 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.93 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
assumed that Customers visits to hotels for food have gone down in Covid
19 Pandemic period.

Prices of hotel rooms have gone down in Covid 19 Pandemic period

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 15.00 37.00 2.47 2.41
Thane 15.00 34.00 2.27 2.21
Kalyan 15.00 32.00 2.13 1.70
Other cities 15.00 28.00 1.87 1.84

Figure 5.36 Prices of hotel rooms have gone down in Covid 19 Pandemic
period (Citywise)

WHETHER PRICES OF HOTEL


ROOMS HAVE GONE DOWN IN COVID 19 PANDEMIC PERIOD
Between GroupsWithin Groups

120.00 114.13

100.00

80.00

60.00 56.00

40.00

20.00
2.85 3.00 0.952.04 0.47 0.71 2.77
0.00
SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 2.85 3.00 0.95 0.47 0.71 2.77
Within Groups 114.13 56.00 2.04

100 | P a g
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.47 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.77 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that Prices of hotel rooms have gone down in Covid 19
Pandemic period.
Figure 5.37 Prices of hotel rooms have gone down in Covid 19 Pandemic
period (Genderwise)

WHETHER PRICES OF HOTEL


ROOMS HAVE GONE DOWN IN
COVID 19 PANDEMIC PERIOD

1.81
Variance
1.73

2.06
Average
2.22

103.00
Sum 111.00

50.00
Count 50.00

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.0080.00100.00120.00


Count Sum Average Variance
Female 50.00 103.00 2.06 1.81
Male 50.00 111.00 2.22 1.73

FemaleMale

ANOVA
Source of SS df MS F P- F crit
Variation value
Between Groups 0.64 1.00 0.64 0.36 0.55 3.94
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.

101 | P a g
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.36 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.94 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that Prices of hotel rooms have gone down in Covid 19
Pandemic period.

Questionnaire relating to Professionals:


Data was collected from 100 professionals (Chartered Accountants, Cost
Accountants, Tax practitioner and Advocates of Mumbai, Thane, Kalyan,
Ambernath and Ulhasnagar cities. Data was analysed through Anova (F)
test and Z test.

Figure 5.38 Profit of Hotel industry has gone up in the post GST era
(Citywise)

Profit of Hotel industry has gone up in the post GST era


80.00

70.00
65.00

60.00

50.00

40.00
74.00
70.00
30.00
25.00

20.00

25.00 25.00
10.00
2.60
25.0073.00 2.922.802.96 1.581.251.12 1.17
0.00
Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 25.00 73.00 2.92 1.58
Thane 25.00 70.00 2.80 1.25
Kalyan 25.00 65.00 2.60 1.17
Other cities 25.00 74.00 2.96 1.12

MumbaiThaneKalyanOther cities

102 | P a g
ANOVA
Source of SS df MS F P- F crit
Variation value
Between Groups 1.96 3.00 0.65 0.51 0.68 2.70
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.51 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.70 and P-value is also more than 0.05 I.E 0.51.
Researcher concluded that profit of hotel industry has gone up in the post
GST era.

Table No. 5.71 Descriptive Statistics of Profit of Hotel industry has gone
up in the post GST era (Citywise)
Male Female

Mean 2.90 Mean 2.74


Standard Error 0.15 Standard Error 0.17
Median 3.00 Median 3.00
Standard Deviation 1.07 Standard Deviation 1.17
Sample Variance 1.15 Sample Variance 1.38
Count 50.00 Count 50.00
Confidence Level(95.0%) 0.31 Confidence 0.33
Level(95.0%)
Figure 5.39 Profit of Hotel industry has gone up in the post GST era
(Genderwise)

Profit of Hotel industry has gone up


in the post GST era
505.000.00
50.00
40.00
30.00 2.920.714.115.380.00 0.71 0.24 1.64 0.48 1.96
0.00
20.00
Mean Know Obse Hypo z P(Z<= z P(Z<= z
10.00
n rvatio thesiz z) Critic z) Critic
Varia ns ed one- al two- al
nce Mean tail one- tail two-
Differ tail tail
ence
Male 2.90 1.15 50.00 0.00 0.71 0.24 1.64 0.48 1.96
Female 2.74 1.38 50.00

MaleFemale

103 | P a g
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value 0.71 is less than Z
critical value 1.96. Researcher concluded that profit of hotel industry has
gone up in the post GST era.
Prices of food have gone up due to Goods and Service Tax
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 25.00 51.00 2.04 1.29
Thane 25.00 64.00 2.56 1.67
Kalyan 25.00 58.00 2.32 1.64
Other Cities 25.00 68.00 2.72 1.21

Figure 5.40 Prices of food have gone up due to Goods and Service Tax
(Citywise)

Do you think prices of food have gone up


due to Goods and Service Tax (GST)?
100%
90%
80%
70%
60% 1.4
5

1
39.6 9 6.0 1.51 0.2 2.7
50%
0 0 2 0
40%
30% 2.2
20% 0
10%
0%
6.59

3.00
SS df MS F P-value F crit
Within Groups 139.60 96.00 1.45
Between Groups 6.59 3.00 2.20 1.51 0.22 2.70
Between GroupsWithin Groups

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.

104 | P a g
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.51 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.70 and P-value is also more than 0.05 i.e 0.22.
Researcher concluded that Prices of food have gone up due to Goods and
Service Tax.

Table No.5.72 Descriptive Statistics of Prices of food have gone up due to


GST
Male Female

Mean 2.44 Mean 2.38


Standard Error 0.18 Standard Error 0.17
Median 2.00 Median 2.00
Standard Deviation 1.25 Standard Deviation 1.19
Sample Variance 1.56 Sample Variance 1.42
Count 50.00 Count 50.00
Largest(1) 5.00 Largest(1) 5.00
Smallest(1) 1.00 Smallest(1) 1.00
Confidence Level (95.0%) 0.35 Confidence Level 0.34
(95.0%)

Figure No.5.41 Prices of food have gone up due to GST (Genderwise)

Prices of food have gone up due to Goods and Serv

60.00 50.00
50.00 50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00 2.38
1.42
10.00 2.44 0.00 0.250.40 1.64 0.811.96
1.56
0.00 Hypo Obse thesi z Criticz Critic
al one-altail
two- tail
Kno P(Z< P(Z<
1.96
wn =z) one- tail =z) two- tail
Mean Varia rvatized z
0.40
ons Mean
nce
Di…
Male2.44 1.56 50.00 0.00 0.25 1.64 0.81
Female 2.38 1.42 50.00
MaleFemale

105 | P a g
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value 1.64 is less than Z
critical value 1.96. Researcher concluded that Prices of food have gone up
due to Goods and Service Tax.
Figure 5.42 Quality of food served in the hotels has declined due to Goods
and Service Tax (Citywise)

Mumbai
3.36 1.07

25.00

84.00

CountSumAverageVariance

Thane
2.44 1.17

25.00

61.00

CountSumAverageVariance

106 | P a g
Kalyan
2.72 1.46

25.00

68.00

CountSumAverageVariance

Other cities
3.12 1.19

25.00

78.00

CountSumAverageVariance

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P- F
value crit
Between Groups 12.59 3.00 4.20 3.43 0.02 2.70

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.51 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.70 and P-value is also more than 0.05 i.e 0.22.
Researcher concluded that Quality of food served in hotels declined due to
Goods and Service Tax.

107 | P a g
Table No. 5.73 Descriptive Statistics of Quality of food served in the hotels
has declined due to Goods and Service Tax
Male Female

Mean 3.23 Mean 2.63


Standard Error 0.17 Standard Error 0.15
Median 3.50 Median 3.00
Standard Deviation 1.19 Standard Deviation 1.04
Sample Variance 1.41 Sample Variance 1.09
Count 48.00 Count 48.00
Largest(1) 5.00 Largest(1) 5.00
Smallest(1) 1.00 Smallest(1) 1.00
Confidence Level(95.0%) 0.35 Confidence 0.30
Level(95.0%)

z-Test: Two Sample for


Means
Male Female
Mean 3.23 2.63
Known Variance 1.41 1.09
Observations 48.00 48.00
Hypothesized Mean 0.00
Difference
z 2.65
P(Z<=z) two-tail 0.01
z Critical two-tail 1.96

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Alternative hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value is 2.65 more
than Z critical value 1.96. Researcher assumed that Quality of food served
in hotels has not declined due to Goods and Service Tax.

108 | P a g
Figure 5.43 Quality of services provided in the hotels have dropped due to
Goods and Service Tax (Citywise)

Quality of services provided in the hotels have


dropped due to GST
100%
90%
25 73 2.92 1.08
80%
70%
25 73 2.92 1.08
60%
50%
25 62 2.48 40%
1.18
30%
25 82 3.28 20%
1.04
10%
Count Sum Average Variance
0%
Others 25 73 2.92 1.08
Kalyan 25 73 2.92 1.08
Thane 25 62 2.48 1.18
Mumbai 25 82 3.28 1.04

MumbaiThaneKalyanOthers

ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between
Groups 8.04 3 2.68 2.45 0.07 2.70

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 2.45 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.70 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
assumed that Quality of services provided in the hotels have dropped due
to Goods and Service Tax.

109 | P a g
Figure 5.44 Quality of services provided in the hotels have dropped due to
Goods and Service Tax (Genderwise)

Do you think quality of services provided in the


hotels have dropped due to Goods and Service
Tax (GST)?

159.00

131.00

50.00 50.00 131.00

50.00
3.182.623.182.62 1.051.101.051.10
50.00 159.00

Count Sum Average Variance


Male Female Male Female

ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 7.84 1.00 7.84 7.31 0.01 3.94

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Alternative hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 7.31 is
greater than F critical value i.e. 3.94 and P-value is also less than 0.05.
Researcher assumed that Quality of services provided in the hotels have
not dropped due to Goods and Service Tax.

110 | P a g
Figure No. 5.45 Prices of hotel rooms have gone up after implementation
of Goods and Service Tax (Citywise)

Prices of hotel rooms have gone up after


implementation of Goods and Service Tax
100%
25.00 0.68
62.00 2.48
80%
0.83
60% 25.00 52.00 2.08

40% 25.00 1.21


57.00 2.28
20%
25.00 50.00 2.00 0.83
0%
Count Sum Average Variance

MumbaiThaneKalyanOther cities

ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between
Groups 3.47 3.00 1.16 1.30 0.28 2.70
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.30 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.70 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that Prices of hotel rooms have gone up after implementation of
Goods and Service Tax.

Figure No. 5.46 Prices of hotel rooms have gone up after implementation
of Goods and Service Tax (Genderwise)

Prices of hotel rooms have gone up after


implementation of Goods and Service Tax

100% 0.80
2.34 50.00

50% 2.08 0.97 50.00

0%
Mean Known VarianceObservations

MaleFemale

111 | P a g
Table no. 5.74 Descriptive Statistics of prices of hotel rooms have gone up
after implementation of Goods and Service Tax (Genderwise)

z-Test: Two Sample for Means


Male Female
Mean 2.08 2.34
Known Variance 0.97 0.80
Observations 50.00 50.00
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0.00
z -1.38
P(Z<=z) two-tail 0.17
z Critical two-tail 1.96

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value = (1.38) is less than
Z critical value i.e 1.96 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that Prices of hotel rooms have gone up after implementation of
Goods and Service Tax.

Benefit of Goods and Service Tax (Input Tax Credit) hotel owner are passing
to customers

Anova: Single Factor


SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 25.00 78.00 3.12 1.69
Thane 25.00 56.00 2.24 1.27
Kalyan 25.00 66.00 2.64 1.24
Other cities 25.00 70.00 2.80 1.00

112 | P a g
Figure No. 5.47 Benefit of Goods and Service Tax (Input Tax Credit) hotel
owner are passing to customers (Citywise)

Whether benefit of Goods and Service Tax


(Input Tax Credit) hotel owner are passing to
customers?

100%
90%
1.30
80%
70%

60%
124.96 96.00
50% 2.57 0.06 2.70
40%
30% 3.35
20%
10%
0%
10.04 3.00
SSdfMSFP-valueF crit

Between GroupsWithin Groups

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 2.57 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.70 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
assumed that Benefit of Goods and Service Tax (Input Tax Credit) hotel
owner are passing to customers.

Table no.5.75 Descriptive Statistics of Benefit of Input Tax Credit hotel


owners are passing to customers

Male Female
Mean 2.76 Mean 2.64
Standard Error 0.18 Standard Error 0.15
Median 2.50 Median 3.00
Standard Deviation 1.29 Standard Deviation 1.05
Sample Variance 1.66 Sample Variance 1.09
Sum 138.00 Sum 132.00
Count 50.00 Count 50.00
Largest(1) 5.00 Largest(1) 5.00
Smallest(1) 1.00 Smallest(1) 1.00
Confidence Level(95.0%) 0.37 Confidence Level(95.0%) 0.30

113 | P a g
Figure No. 5.48 Benefit of Goods and Service Tax (Input Tax Credit) hotel
owner are passing to customers (Genderwise)

Benefit of Goods and Service Tax (Input Tax


Credit) hotel owner are passing to customers

100%
90%
80%
1.09
2.64 50.00
70%
60%
50%
0.510.301.640.611.96

40%
30% 1.66
2.76 50.00
20%
10%
0%
0.00

MaleFemale

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value is 0.51 less than Z
critical value 1.96. Researcher assumed that Benefit of Input Tax
Credit hotel owners are passing to customers.
Visits to hotels for food have gone down after implementation of Goods and
Services Tax

ANOVA
P-
Source of Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 8.03 3.00 2.68 2.06 0.11 2.70

114 | P a g
Figure No.5.49 Visits to hotels for food have gone down after
implementation of Goods and Services Tax (Citywise)

Visits to hotels for food have gone down after


implementation of Goods and Services Tax

100%
25.00 79.00 3.16 1.31
80%
25.00 1.09
64.00 2.56
60%

25.00 1.25
40% 60.00 2.40

20% 25.00 68.00 2.72 1.54

0%
Count Sum Average Variance

MumbaiThaneKalyanOther Cities

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 2.06 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.70 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
construed that Customers visits to hotels for food have gone down after
implementation of Goods and Services Tax.

Table no. 5.76 Descriptive Statistics of Visits to hotels for food have gone
down after implementation of Goods and Services Tax

Male Female

Mean 2.78 Mean 2.64


Standard Error 0.17 Standard Error 0.15
Median 3.00 Median 2.00
Standard Deviation 1.23 Standard Deviation 1.08
Sample Variance 1.52 Sample Variance 1.17
Sum 139.00 Sum 132.00
Count 50.00 Count 50.00
Largest(1) 5.00 Largest(1) 5.00
Smallest(1) 1.00 Smallest(1) 1.00
Confidence
Confidence Level(95.0%) 0.35 Level(95.0%) 0.31

115 | P a g
Figure No.5.50 Visits to hotels for food have gone down after
implementation of Goods and Services Tax (Genderwise)

Whether your visits to hotels for food have


gone down after implementation of Goods and Services Tax (GST)?

z Critical two-tail 1.96


P(Z<=z) two-tail z Critical one-tail P(Z<=z) one-tail 0.55
z Hypothesized Mean Difference0.00 1.64
Observations Known Variance 0.27
Mean 0.60

50.00 50.00
1.52 1.17
2.78 2.64

0%20%40%60%80%100%

MaleFemale

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value is 0.60 less than Z
critical value 1.96. Researcher assumed that Visits to hotels for food have
gone down after implementation of Goods and Services Tax.

In Post GST era, Customers orders for foods from hotels have reduced due to
Goods and Service Tax.

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 25.00 74.00 2.96 1.37
Thane 25.00 60.00 2.40 0.83
Kalyan 25.00 70.00 2.80 0.92
Other cities 25.00 74.00 2.96 1.12

116 | P a g
Figure No.5.51 In Post GST era, Customers orders for foods from hotels
have reduced due to Goods and Service Tax(Citywise)

In Post GST era, your orders for foods from


hotels have reduced due to Goods and Service Tax.
120.00
101.92

100.00 96.00

80.00

60.00

40.00

20.00

0.00 1.06
5.24 3.00 1.75 1.65 0.18 2.70
SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 5.24 3.00 1.75 1.65 0.18 2.70
Within Groups 101.92 96.00 1.06

Between GroupsWithin Groups

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.65 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.70 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
assumed that In Post GST era, customers orders for foods from hotels
have reduced due to Goods and Service Tax.

Table no. 5.77 Descriptive Statistics of in Post GST era, Customers orders
for foods from hotels have reduced due to Goods and Service Tax.
Male Female
Mean 2.78 Mean 2.78
Standard Error 0.16 Standard Error 0.13
Median 3.00 Median 3.00
Standard Deviation 1.13 Standard Deviation 0.95
Sample Variance 1.28 Sample Variance 0.91
Count 50.00 Count 50.00
Largest(1) 5.00 Largest(1) 5.00
Smallest(1) 1.00 Smallest(1) 1.00
Confidence Level(95.0%) 0.32 Confidence Level(95.0%) 0.27

117 | P a g
Figure No.5.52 In Post GST era, Customers orders for foods from hotels
have reduced due to Goods and Service Tax (Genderwise)

In Post GST era, your orders for foods from hotels


have reduced due to Goods and Service Tax.

100%
80% 2.78 0.9550.00
60% 0.501.641.001.96
40%
2.78 1.13 50.00
20%
0% 0.000.00

z-Test: Two Sample for Means Male z-Test: Two Sample for Means Female

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value is 0.50 less than Z
critical value 1.96. Researcher assumed that in Post GST era, Customers
orders for foods from hotels have reduced due to Goods and Service Tax.
Figure No.5.53 Cost of accommodation of hotels rooms has increased due
to GST, hence rent of hotels has gone up (Citywise)

Do you think, Cost of accommodation of hotels


rooms has increased due to GST, hence rent of hotels has gone up?

120.00
100.00 1.23
0.92
0.91 2.68 1.13 2.44
2.28
80.00 2.08
60.00
40.00
20.00 52.00 57.00 61.00
67.00
0.00
25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00

Mumbai Thane Kalyan Other cities

CountSumAverageVariance

118 | P a g
ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 4.83 3.00 1.61 1.54 0.21 2.70

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.54 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.70 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
assumed that Cost of accommodation of hotels rooms has increased due to
GST, hence rent of hotels has gone up

Table No. 5.78 Descriptive Statistics of Cost of accommodation of hotels


rooms has increased due to GST, hence rent of hotels has gone up
Male Female

Mean 2.26 Mean 2.44


Standard Error 0.16 Standard Error 0.13
Median 2.00 Median 2.00
Standard Deviation 1.10 Standard Deviation 0.93
Sample Variance 1.22 Sample Variance 0.86
Count 50.00 Count 50.00
Largest(1) 5.00 Largest(1) 5.00
Smallest(1) 1.00 Smallest(1) 1.00
Confidence Level (95.0%) 0.31 Confidence Level (95.0%) 0.26

Figure No.5.54 Cost of accommodation of hotels rooms has increased due


to GST, hence rent of hotels has gone up (Genderwise)

Do you think, Cost of accommodation of hotels


rooms has increased due to GST, hence rent of
hotels has gone up?

100%
2.440.9350.00
50% 0.191.640.371.96
2.261.1050.00
0% 0.00

-50% -0.89

-100%

MaleFemale

119 | P a g
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value is (0.89) less than Z
critical value 1.96. Researcher assumed that Cost of accommodation of
hotels rooms has increased due to GST, hence rent of hotels has gone up.

Figure No.5.55 GST rates on sale of food in hotels and rent on hotel
rooms must be reduced (Citywise)

Do you feel Goods and Service Tax rates on sale


of food in hotels and rent on hotel rooms must be reduced?

Variance 0.81 1.50 0.96 1.36

Average 2.16 2.60 2.28 2.76

Sum 54.00 65.00 57.00 69.00

Count 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

MumbaiThaneKalyanOther cities

ANOVA
P-
Source of Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 5.79 3.00 1.93 1.67 0.18 2.70

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.67 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.70 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
assumed that GST rates on sale of food and rent on hotel rooms must be
reduced.

120 | P a g
Table No. 5.79 Descriptive Statistics of Goods and service Tax rates on
sale of food and rent on hotel rooms must be reduced

Male Female

Mean 2.46 Mean 2.44


Standard Error 0.15 Standard Error 0.16
Median 2.00 Median 2.00
Standard Deviation 1.05 Standard Deviation 1.13
Sample Variance 1.11 Sample Variance 1.27
Count 50.00 Count 50.00
Largest(1) 5.00 Largest(1) 5.00
Smallest(1) 1.00 Smallest(1) 1.00
Confidence
Level(95.0%) 0.30 Confidence Level(95.0%) 0.32

Figure No.5.56 GST rates on sale of food in hotels and rent on hotel rooms
must be reduced (Genderwise)

Do you feel Goods and Service Tax rates on sale


of food in hotels and rent on hotel rooms must be reduced?

z Critical two-tail 1.96


0.92
z Critical one-tail 1.64
0.46
z 0.00 0.10
Observations 50.00 50.00
1.05 1.13
Mean 2.46 2.44
0% 20%40% 60%80% 100%

MaleFemale

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value is less 0.10 than Z
critical value 1.96. Researcher assumed that GST rates on sale of food and
rent on hotel rooms must be reduced.

121 | P a g
Table No. 5.80 Descriptive Statistics Mumbai Hotel industry has affected
badly in Covid 19 Pandemic

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 25.00 55.00 2.20 1.58
Thane 25.00 72.00 2.88 1.69
Kalyan 25.00 58.00 2.32 1.06
Other cities 25.00 66.00 2.64 1.41

ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 7.15 3.00 2.38 1.66 0.18 2.70
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.66 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.70 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
construed that Mumbai Hotel industry has affected badly in Covid 19
Pandemic.

Figure No.5.57 Mumbai Hotel industry has affected badly in Covid 19


Pandemic (Genderwise)

Do you think Mumbai Hotel industry has affected


badly in Covid 19 Pandemci?

100%
80% 1.14
2.66 50.00

60%
40%
2.36 1.27 50.00
20%
0%

Mean Known Variance Observations

MaleFemale

122 | P a g
Table No.5.81 Descriptive Statistics Mumbai Hotel industry has affected
badly in Covid 19 Pandemic (Genderwise)

z-Test: Two Sample for Means


Male Female
Mean 2.36 2.66
Known Variance 1.27 1.14
Observations 50.00 50.00
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0.00
z -1.37
P(Z<=z) two-tail 0.17
z Critical two-tail 1.96
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value is (1.37) less than Z
critical value 1.96). Researcher construed that Mumbai Hotel industry has
affected badly in Covid 19 Pandemic.

Visits to hotels for food have gone down in Covid 19 Pandemic period
Anova: Single Factor
SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 25.00 56.00 2.24 1.52
Thane 25.00 57.00 2.28 1.38
Kalyan 25.00 61.00 2.44 1.26
Other Cities 25.00 73.00 2.92 1.33

Figure No.5.58 Visits to hotels for food have gone down in Covid 19
Pandemic period (Citywise)

Whether your visits to hotels for food have gone


down in Covid 19 Pandemic period?

100%
80% 1.37

60% 131.60 96.00 1.78 0.16 2.70


40%
20% 2.44
0%
7.31 3.00
SS df
MS F P-value F crit

Between GroupsWithin Groups

123 | P a g
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.78 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.70 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
assumed that visits to hotels for food have gone down in Covid 19
Pandemic period.

Figure No.5.59 Visits to hotels for food have gone down in Covid 19
Pandemic period (Genderwise)

Whether your visits to hotels for food have gone


down in Covid 19 Pandemic period?

Observations 50.00 50.00

Known Variance 1.32 1.52

Mean 2.48 2.46

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

MaleFemale

Table No.5.82 Descriptive Statistics Visits to hotels for food have gone
down in Covid 19 Pandemic period (Genderwise)

z-Test: Two Sample for Means


Male Female
Mean 2.48 2.46
Known Variance 1.32 1.52
Observations 50.00 50.00
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0.00
z 0.08
P(Z<=z) two-tail 0.93
z Critical two-tail 1.96

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.

124 | P a g
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value is 0.08 less than Z
critical value 1.96. Researcher assumed that visits to hotels for food have
gone down in Covid 19 Pandemic period.

Figure No.5.60 Prices of hotel rooms have gone down in Covid 19


Pandemic Period (Citywise)

Whether prices of hotel rooms have gone down


in Covid 19 Pandemic period?

100%
25.00 76.00 3.04 1.21
80%
60% 25.00 67.00 2.68 1.56
40%
20% 25.00 69.00 2.76 1.86
0%
25.00 71.00 2.84 1.14

Count Sum Average Variance

MumbaiThaneKalyanOther cities

ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between
Groups 1.79 3.00 0.60 0.41 0.74 2.70

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 0.41 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.70 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that price of hotel rooms have gone down in Covid 19 pandemic
period.

125 | P a g
Figure No.5.61 Prices of hotel rooms have gone down in Covid 19
Pandemic Period (Genderwise)

Whether prices of hotel rooms have gone down


in Covid 19 Pandemic period?

100%
80% 2.68
1.65 50.00

60%
40%
2.98 50.00
1.16
20%

0%
Mean Known Variance Observations

MaleFemale

Table No.5.83 Descriptive Statistics Prices of hotel rooms have gone down
in Covid 19 Pandemic Period (Genderwise)

z-Test: Two Sample for Means


Male Female
Mean 2.98 2.68
Known Variance 1.16 1.65
Observations 50.00 50.00
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0.00
z 1.27
P(Z<=z) two-tail 0.21
z Critical two-tail 1.96

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.


H1: there is significant difference between the mean of 2 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as Z value is 1.27 less than Z
critical value 1.96. Researcher concluded that price of hotel rooms have
gone down in Covid 19 pandemic period.

126 | P a g
Figure No.5.62 On vacation hotel rooms are booked with or without GST
to reduce rent of rooms

When you are going for vacation, do you book


hotel rooms with or without Goods and Service
Tax(GST) to reduce rent of rooms?

Without GST 42

With GST 58

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Conclusion: Researcher assumed that peoples are booking hotel rooms


with GST as 58 respondent out of 100 respondents replied they are
booking rooms with GST.

127 | P a g
Questionnaire relating to Hotels (Managers and Employees)

Primary data was collected from 200 respondents (Hotel Managers and
Employees) from different cities such as Mumbai, Thane, Kalyan and
Other cities.

Figure No.5.63 Hotel is registered dealer under GST

Whether hotel is Registered Dealer under GST?


250

200

150
Numb

100 200
149
50
51

0
Hotel Yes No

Table No.5.84 Descriptive Statistics Hotel is registered dealer under GST

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
1 Star 64.00 84.00 1.31 0.22
2 Star 73.00 93.00 1.27 0.20
3 Star 63.00 74.00 1.17 0.15

ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 0.65 2.00 0.32 1.70 0.19 3.04

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.

128 | P a g
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value = 1.70 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.04 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
assumed that hotel are registered under GST Act.

Figure No.5.64 Hotel is registered dealer under GST (Citywise)

Whether hotel is Registered Dealer under GST

100%
40.00 56.00 1.40 0.25
80%
51.00 63.00
1.24
60% 0.18
50.00 59.00
40% 1.18 0.15

20% 59.00 73.00 1.24 0.18

0%
Count Sum Average Variance

MumbaiThaneKalyanOther cities

ANOVA
P-
Source of Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 1.16 3.00 0.39 2.06 0.11 2.65

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =2.06 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.65 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
assumed that hotel are registered under GST Act.
Figure No.5.65 Hotel has applied for Regular scheme or
Composition scheme under GST

Whether hotel has applied for Regular scheme or


Composition scheme under GST

200
200 85 64 51
Numb

0
Hotels Regular Composition Not applied

129 | P a g
Conclusion: Researcher concluded that 85 hotels have applied for Regular
Scheme, 64 hotels have applied for Composition scheme and 51 hotels
have not applied for GST any scheme.

Figure No. 5.66 Which scheme is better Regular Scheme or Composition


Scheme under GST Act

Which scheme is better Regular Scheme or


Composition Scheme under GST Act

Don't Know 57

Composition 60

Regular 83

Hotels 200

0 50 100 150 200 250


Respondents

Researched construed that 83 respondents replied Regular Scheme is


better, 60 respondents replied Composition scheme is better and 57
respondents were not having idea which scheme is better.

Figure no. 5.67 Whether your hotel is filing GST returns

Whether your hotel is filing GST returns?

200

150
200
Responde

100 143

50
57
0
Hotels Yes No

130 | P a g
Table no. 5.85 Descriptive statistics of hotels are filing GST returns
(Starwise)

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
1 Star 64.00 85.00 1.33 0.22
2 Star 73.00 96.00 1.32 0.22
3 Star 63.00 76.00 1.21 0.17

ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 0.57 2.00 0.29 1.41 0.25 3.04

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =1.41 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.04 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that hotels are filing GST returns.

Table no. 5.86 Descriptive statistics of hotels are filing GST returns
(Citywise)

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 59.00 76.00 1.29 0.21
Thane 50.00 60.00 1.20 0.16
Kalyan 51.00 65.00 1.27 0.20
Other cities 40.00 56.00 1.40 0.25

ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 0.90 3.00 0.30 1.47 0.22 2.65

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.

131 | P a g
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =1.47 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.65 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that hotels are filing GST returns.

Table no. 5.87 Descriptive statistics of tax rates were normal before GST
era (Starwise)

Anova: Single Factor

SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
1 Star 63.00 147.00 2.33 0.71
2 Star 63.00 156.00 2.48 0.90
3 Star 63.00 155.00 2.46 0.61

ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 0.77 2.00 0.39 0.52 0.59 3.04

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =0.52 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.04 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that GST rates were normal before GST era.
Table no. 5.88 Descriptive statistics of tax rates were normal before GST
era (Citywise)

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 40.00 103.00 2.58 0.76
Thane 40.00 104.00 2.60 0.91
Kalyan 40.00 85.00 2.13 0.63
Other Cities 40.00 103.00 2.58 0.81
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 6.32 3.00 2.11 2.70 0.05 2.66

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.

132 | P a g
Conclusion: Alternative hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =2.70 is
more than F critical value i.e 2.66. Researcher concluded that tax rates
were not normal before GST era.

Table no. 5.89 Descriptive statistics of tax rates were normal after GST
era (Starwise)

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
1 Star 63.00 187.00 2.97 1.00
2 Star 63.00 182.00 2.89 0.84
3 Star 63.00 166.00 2.63 0.72
P-
Source of Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 3.82 2.00 1.91 2.24 0.11 3.04

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =2.24 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.04 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that tax rates were normal after GST era.

Table no. 5.90 Descriptive statistics of tax rates were normal after GST
era (Citywise)
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 40.00 118.00 2.95 0.72
Thane 40.00 126.00 3.15 0.90
Kalyan 40.00 102.00 2.55 0.97
Other Cities 40.00 105.00 2.63 0.80
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 9.47 3.00 3.16 3.72 0.01 2.66

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Alternative hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =3.71 is more
than F critical value i.e 2.66 and P value is also less than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that tax rates were not normal after GST era.

133 | P a g
Table no. 5.91 Descriptive statistics of whether hotel business has
increased after GST implementation (Starwise)
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
1 Star 63.00 156.00 2.48 0.96
2 Star 63.00 170.00 2.70 1.05
3 Star 63.00 154.00 2.44 0.80
P-
Source of Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 2.41 2.00 1.21 1.29 0.28 3.04

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =1.29 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.04 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
assumed that hotel business has increased after GST implementation.

Table no. 5.92 Descriptive statistics of whether hotel business has


increased after GST implementation (Citywise)

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 40.00 96.00 2.40 0.76
Thane 40.00 115.00 2.88 0.98
Kalyan 40.00 103.00 2.58 1.33
Other cities 40.00 83.00 2.08 0.64
P-
Source of Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 13.42 3.00 4.47 4.83 0.00 2.66

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Alternative hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =4.83 is more
than F critical value i.e 2.66 and P value is also less than 0.05. Researcher
assumed that hotel business has not increased after GST implementation.

134 | P a g
Table no. 5.93 Descriptive statistics of whether hotel room booking has
increased after GST implementation (Starwise)
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
1 Star 63.00 153.00 2.43 1.02
2 Star 63.00 146.00 2.32 0.74
3 Star 63.00 144.00 2.29 1.11
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 0.71 2.00 0.35 0.37 0.69 3.04

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =0.37 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.04 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researched
construed that hotel room booking has increased after GST
implementation.

Table no. 5.94 Descriptive statistics of whether hotel room booking has
increased after GST implementation (Citywise)

Anova: Single Factor


Averag Varianc
Groups Count Sum e e
Mumbai 40.00 102.00 2.55 0.82
Thane 40.00 99.00 2.48 0.87
Kalyan 40.00 98.00 2.45 1.28
Other Cities 40.00 74.00 1.85 0.64
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 12.57 3.00 4.19 4.64 0.00 2.66

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Alternative hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =4.64 is more
than F critical value i.e 2.66 and P value is also less than 0.05. Researched
construed that hotel room booking has not increased after GST
implementation.

135 | P a g
Table no. 5.95 Descriptive statistics of whether room rates have increased
after GST implementation (Starwise)
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
1 Star 63.00 134.00 2.13 0.95
2 Star 63.00 150.00 2.38 0.95
3 Star 63.00 145.00 2.30 0.63
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 2.13 2.00 1.06 1.26 0.29 3.04
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.
H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =1.26 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.04 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that room rates have increased after GST implementation.
Table no. 5.96 Descriptive statistics of whether room rates have increased
after GST implementation (Citywise)
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 40.00 95.00 2.38 0.80
Thane 40.00 100.00 2.50 1.28
Kalyan 40.00 81.00 2.03 0.74
Other cities 40.00 76.00 1.90 0.55
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 9.65 3.00 3.22 3.80 0.01 2.66
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Alternative hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =3.80 is more
than F critical value i.e 2.66 and P value is also less than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that room rates have increased after GST implementation.

Table no. 5.97 Descriptive statistics of whether cost of food has enhanced
after GST implementation (Starwise)
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
1 Star 63.00 147.00 2.33 1.06
2 Star 63.00 156.00 2.48 0.90
3 Star 63.00 143.00 2.27 0.85
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 1.41 2.00 0.70 0.75 0.47 3.04

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.

136 | P a g
H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =0.75 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.04 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
assumed that cost of food has enhanced after GST implementation.

Table no. 5.98 Descriptive statistics of whether cost of food has enhanced
after GST implementation (Citywise)

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 40.00 104.00 2.60 0.91
Thane 40.00 106.00 2.65 1.11
Kalyan 40.00 87.00 2.18 0.92
Other cities 40.00 74.00 1.85 0.85
P-
Source of Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 17.17 3.00 5.72 6.05 0.00 2.66

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Alternative hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =6.05 is more
than F critical value i.e 2.66 and P value is also less than 0.05. Researcher
assumed that cost of food has not enhanced after GST implementation.

Table no. 5.99 Descriptive statistics of whether complains were received


regarding food quality before GST era (Starwise)
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
1 Star 63.00 175.00 2.78 0.66
2 Star 63.00 183.00 2.90 0.86
3 Star 63.00 188.00 2.98 0.79
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 1.37 2.00 0.68 0.89 0.41 3.04

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =0.89 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.04 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that complains were received regarding food quality before
GST era.

137 | P a g
Table no. 5.100 Descriptive statistics of whether complains were received
regarding food quality before GST era (Citywise)

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 40.00 114.00 2.85 0.85
Thane 40.00 114.00 2.85 0.54
Kalyan 40.00 119.00 2.98 0.85
Other Cities 40.00 121.00 3.03 0.54
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 0.95 3.00 0.32 0.46 0.71 2.66

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =0.46 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.66 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that complains were received regarding food quality before
GST era.

Table no. 5.101 Descriptive statistics of whether complains were received


regarding food quality after GST era (Starwise)

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
1 Star 63.00 201.00 3.19 0.83
2 Star 63.00 191.00 3.03 0.87
3 Star 63.00 211.00 3.35 1.17
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 3.17 2.00 1.59 1.66 0.19 3.04

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =1.66 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.04 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that complains were received regarding food quality after GST
era.

138 | P a g
Table no. 5.102 Descriptive statistics of whether complains were received
regarding food quality after GST era (Citywise)

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 40.00 129.00 3.23 1.10
Thane 40.00 126.00 3.15 0.85
Kalyan 40.00 127.00 3.18 1.07
Other Cities 40.00 132.00 3.30 0.73
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 0.53 3.00 0.18 0.19 0.91 2.66

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =0.19 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.66 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that complains were received regarding food quality after GST
era.

Table no. 5.103 Descriptive statistics of whether complains regarding


rooms services have increased after GST era (Starwise)

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
1 Star 63.00 150.00 2.38 0.85
2 Star 63.00 149.00 2.37 0.85
3 Star 63.00 160.00 2.54 0.93
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 1.17 2.00 0.59 0.67 0.51 3.04
H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.
H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =0.67 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.04 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
assumed that complains regarding rooms services have increased after
GST era.

139 | P a g
Table no. 5.104 Descriptive statistics of whether complains regarding
rooms services have increased after GST era (Citywise)

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 40.00 98.00 2.45 0.61
Thane 40.00 95.00 2.38 1.01
Kalyan 40.00 91.00 2.28 0.87
Other Cities 40.00 104.00 2.60 0.71
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 2.25 3.00 0.75 0.94 0.42 2.66

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =0.94 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.66 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
assumed that complains regarding rooms services have increased after
GST era.

Table no. 5.105 Descriptive statistics of Mumbai Hotel industry has


affected badly in Covid 19 Pandemic (Starwise)

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
1 Star 63.00 132.00 2.10 0.70
2 Star 63.00 154.00 2.44 0.99
3 Star 63.00 135.00 2.14 0.64
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 4.52 2.00 2.26 2.90 0.06 3.04

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =2.90 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.04 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
assumed that Mumbai Hotel industry has affected badly in Covid 19
Pandemic.

140 | P a g
Table no. 5.106 Descriptive statistics of Mumbai Hotel industry has
affected badly in Covid 19 Pandemic (Citywise)

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 40.00 97.00 2.43 0.66
Thane 40.00 87.00 2.18 0.92
Kalyan 40.00 77.00 1.93 0.89
Other cities 40.00 88.00 2.20 0.47
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 5.02 3.00 1.67 2.27 0.08 2.66

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =2.27 is less than F
critical value i.e 2.66 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
assumed that Mumbai Hotel industry has affected badly in Covid 19
Pandemic.

Table no. 5.107 Descriptive statistics of prices of hotel rooms have gone
down in Covid 19 Pandemic period (Starwise)

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
1 Star 63.00 136.00 2.16 0.68
2 Star 63.00 134.00 2.13 0.44
3 Star 63.00 134.00 2.13 0.60
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 0.04 2.00 0.02 0.04 0.96 3.04

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =0.04 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.04 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
construed that prices of hotel rooms have gone down in Covid 19
Pandemic period.

141 | P a g
Table no. 5.108 Descriptive statistics of prices of hotel rooms have gone
down in Covid 19 Pandemic period (Citywise)
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 40.00 95.00 2.38 0.55
Thane 40.00 89.00 2.23 0.59
Kalyan 40.00 71.00 1.78 0.49
Other cities 40.00 83.00 2.08 0.48
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 7.88 3.00 2.63 4.99 0.00 2.66

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Alternative hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =4.99 is more
than F critical value i.e 2.66 and P value is also less than 0.05. Researcher
construed that prices of hotel rooms have not gone down in Covid 19
Pandemic period.

Table no. 5.109 Descriptive statistics of Goods and Service Tax rates on
sale of food in hotels and rent on hotel rooms must be reduced
(Starwise)
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
1 Star 63.00 121.00 1.92 0.40
2 Star 63.00 132.00 2.10 0.47
3 Star 63.00 130.00 2.06 0.48
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 1.09 2.00 0.54 1.21 0.30 3.04

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =1.21 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.04 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that Goods and Service Tax rates on sale of food in hotels and
rent on hotel rooms must be reduced.

142 | P a g
Table no. 5.110 Descriptive statistics of Goods and Service Tax rates on
sale of food in hotels and rent on hotel rooms must be reduced (Citywise)

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 40.00 91.00 2.28 0.41
Thane 40.00 83.00 2.08 0.58
Kalyan 40.00 67.00 1.68 0.28
Other Cities 40.00 76.00 1.90 0.35
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 7.82 3.00 2.61 6.44 0.00 2.66

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Alternative hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =6.44 is more
than F critical value i.e 2.66 and P value is also less than 0.05. . Researcher
concluded that Goods and Service Tax rates on sale of food in hotels and
rent on hotel rooms must not be reduced.

Table no. 5.111 Descriptive statistics of whether cost of foods has


enhanced after GST implementation (Starwise)

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
1 Star 63.00 131.00 2.08 0.72
2 Star 63.00 134.00 2.13 0.53
3 Star 63.00 136.00 2.16 0.62
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 0.20 2.00 0.10 0.16 0.85 3.04

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =0.16 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.04 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
assumed that cost of foods has enhanced after GST implementation.

143 | P a g
Table no. 5.112 Descriptive statistics of whether cost of foods has
enhanced after GST implementation (Citywise)
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 40.00 98.00 2.45 0.51
Thane 40.00 86.00 2.15 0.75
Kalyan 40.00 70.00 1.75 0.50
Other Cities 40.00 83.00 2.08 0.64
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 9.92 3.00 3.31 5.53 0.00 2.66

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Alternative hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =5.53 is more
than F critical value i.e 2.66 and P value is also less than 0.05. Researcher
assumed that cost of foods has not enhanced after GST implementation.

Table no. 5.113 Descriptive statistics of Hotel Industry business has


affected due to GST implementation (Starwise)
Anova: Single Factor
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
1 Star 63.00 123.00 1.95 0.79
2 Star 63.00 142.00 2.25 0.48
3 Star 63.00 135.00 2.14 0.54
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 2.93 2.00 1.47 2.42 0.09 3.04

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 3 groups.
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =2.42 is less than F
critical value i.e 3.04 and P-value is also more than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that hotel industry business has affected due to GST
implementation.

144 | P a g
Table no. 5.114 Descriptive statistics of Hotel Industry business has
affected due to GST implementation (Starwise)

Anova: Single Factor


Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Mumbai 40.00 98.00 2.45 0.56
Thane 40.00 91.00 2.28 0.67
Kalyan 40.00 68.00 1.70 0.52
Other cities 40.00 76.00 1.90 0.76
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
Between Groups 14.07 3.00 4.69 7.47 0.00 2.66

H0: There is no significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.


H1: There is significant difference between the mean of 4 groups.
Conclusion: Alternative hypothesis is fail to reject as F value =7.47 is more
than F critical value i.e 2.66 and P value is also less than 0.05. Researcher
concluded that hotel industry business has not affected due to GST
implementation.

145 | P a g

You might also like