Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ebook Clinical Manual and Review of Transesophageal Echocardiography PDF Full Chapter PDF
Ebook Clinical Manual and Review of Transesophageal Echocardiography PDF Full Chapter PDF
Transesophageal Echocardiography -
eBook PDF
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebooksecure.com/download/clinical-manual-and-review-of-transesophageal-ec
hocardiography-ebook-pdf/
CLINICAL MANUAL
AND REVIEW OF
TRANSESOPHAGEAL
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
Third Edition
Edited by
New York I Chicago I San Francisco I Athens I London I Madrid I Mexico City
Milan I New Delhi I Singapore I Sydney /Toronto
Copyright © 2020 by McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Except as pemritted under the United States Copyright Act
of 1976, no part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or
retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
ISBN: 978-1-26-046982-0
MHID: 1-26-046982-4
The material in this eBook also appears in the print version of this title: ISBN: 978-0-07-183023-2,
MHID: 0-07-183023-5.
All trademarks are trademarks of their respective owners. Rather than put a trademark symbol after every occurrence of a trade-
marked name, we use names in an editorial fashion only, and to the benefit ofthe trademark own.er, with no intention of infringe-
ment of the trademark. Where such designations appear in this book, they have been printed with initial caps.
McGraw-Hill Education eBooks are available at special quantity discounts to use as premiums and sales promotions or for use in
corporate training programs. To contact a representative, please visit the Contact Us page at www.mhprofessional.com.
Notice
Medicine is an ever-changing science. As new research and clinical experience broaden our knowledge, changes in treatment and
drug therapy are required. The editors and the publisher ofthis work have checked with sources believed to be reliable in their ef-
forts to provide information that is complete and generally in accord with the standards accepted at the time ofpublication. How-
ever, in view of the possibility of human error or changes in medical sciences, neither the editors nor the publisher nor any other
party who has been involved in the preparation or publication of this work warrants that the information contained herein is in
every respect accurate or complete, and they disclaim all responsibility for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained
from use of the information contained in this work. Readers are encouraged to confirm the information contained herein with
other sources. For example and in particular, readers are advised to check the product information sheet included in the package
of each drug they plan to administer to be certain that the information contained in this work is accurate and that changes have
not been made in the recommended dose or in the contraindications for administration. This recommendation is of particular
importance in connection with new or infrequently used drugs.
TERMSOFUSE
This is a copyrighted work and McGraw-Hill Education and its licensors reserve all rights in and to the work. Use of this work
is subject to these terms. Except as pemritted under the Copyright Act ofl 976 and the right to store and retrieve one copy of the
work, you may not decompile, disassemble, reverse engineer, reproduce, modify, create derivative works based upon, transmit,
distribute, disseminate, sell, publish or sublicense the work or any part of it without McGraw-Hill Education's prior consent. You
may use the work for your own noncommercial and personal use; any other use of the work is strictly prohibited. Your right to
use the work may be terminated if you fail to comply with these terms.
THE WORK IS PROVIDED "AS IS." McGRAW-HILL EDUCATION AND ITS LICENSORS MAKE NO GUARANTEES
OR WARRANTIES AS TO THE ACCURACY, ADEQUACY OR COMPLETENESS OF OR RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED
FROM USING THE WORK, INCLUDING ANY INFORMATION THAT CAN BE ACCESSED THROUGH THE WORK
VIA HYPERLINK OR OTHERWISE, AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIM ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, IN-
CLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICU-
LAR PURPOSE. McGraw-Hill Education and its licensors do not warrant or guarantee that the functions contained in the work
will meet your requirements or that its operation will be uninterrupted or error free. Neither McGraw-Hill Education nor its
licensors shall be liable to you or anyone else for any inaccuracy, error or omission, regardless of cause, in the work or for any
damages resulting therefrom. McGraw-Hill Education has no responsibility for the content of any information accessed through
the work. Under no circumstances shall McGraw-Hill Education and/or its licensors be liable for any indirect, incidental, special,
punitive, consequential or similar damages that result from the use of or inability to use the work, even if any of them has been
advised of the possibility of such damages. This limitation ofliability shall apply to any claim or cause whatsoever whether such
claim or cause arises in contract, tort or otherwise.
Contents
Contributors ix
Foreword xiii
Preface xv
1. FUNDAMENTALS OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
3. CLINICAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
4. SPECIAL TOPICS
5. APPENDICES
6. ANSWERS 721
7. INSTRUCTIONAL VIDEOS (ONLINE)
Alina Nicoara and Madhav Swaminathan
1 CARDIAC OUTPUT
2 CONTINUITY EQUATION
3 DP/DT
4 ESTIMATING CHAMBER PRESSURES
s PISA: MITRAL REGURGITATION
6 PISA: MITRAL VALVE AREA
7 PRESSURE HALF-TIME
B PROPAGATION VELOCITY
9 SIMPSON'S METHOD
10 STRAIN
11 TISSUE DOPPLER
12 TRANSMITRAL FLOW
13 3D TEE: LIVE IMAGING
14 3DTEE: ZOOM MODE
vi I Contents
15 3DTEE:GATED IMAGING
16 3D TEE: CROPPING
17 3D TEE: MITRAL VALVE MODELING
BASIC TEE
Khurram Owais and Robina Matya/
ADVANCED TEE
Mario Montealegre-Gal/egos and Feroze Mahmood
INDEX 749
Additional digital content, including a practice exam and videos, associated with this book may be obtained
from McGraw-Hill Professional's MediaCenter at http://mhprofessional.com/mediacenter.
Some material may require a desktop or laptop computer for full access.
Enter this Book's ISBN and your e-mail address at the MediaCenter site to receive an e-mail message with
a download link.
Joseph P. Mathew
Alina Nicoara
I dedicate this book to the many great people who have unself-
ishly given their time and talent to mentor and guide others. To
my mentors, teachers and friends, you have been an integral part
of my career. Working with you has always been a motivating
and memorable journey, which has guided me so far, and always
will. I hope one day to inspire others as you have inspired me.
Chakib M Ayoub
Madhav Swaminathan
This page intentionally left blank
Contributors
Chakib M. Ayoub, MD, MBA [12] Ashlee Davis, ACS, RDCS, BSMI [3]
Professor ofAnesthesiology Cardiac Sonographer, III
Department ofAnesthesiology Dula: Univer!lity Medical Center
Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina
Durham, North Carolina
David B. Adams, ACS, RCS, RDCS, FASE [3] J. Mauricio Del Rio, MD [17)
.As&istant Profes&or
Cardiac Sonographer Emeritus
Divisions of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology & Critical Care
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina Medicine
Department of Anesthesiology
Dalla A. Banks, MD, FASE [9] Duke Univer5ity Medical Center
Division Chief Durham, North Carolina
Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology
Professor lssam El-Rassi, MD [14]
Department ofAnesthesiology .As&istant Profes&or
Univer!lity of California San Diego Department of Surgery
San Diego, California American University of Beirut
Beirut, Lebanon
Shahar Bar-Yosef, MD [26)
Department ofAnesthesiology and Critical Care Renata G. Ferreira, MD [23)
Assuta Medical Center .As&ociate Professor
Td-Aviv, Israd Director of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia Education
Department of Anesthesiology
Brian P. Barrick,. MD, ODS [1] University of Washington Medical Center
Professor Seattle, Washington
Department ofAnesthesiology
Univer5ity of North Carolina Hospitals
Stephanie S. F. Fischer, MD [19)
Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Specialist Anesthesiologist
Brandl A. Bottlger, MD [15) Private Practice
Assistant Professor Johannesburg, South Africa
Program Director, Adult Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology
Fellowship Manuel L. Fontes, MD [20)
Department ofAnesthesiology Professor of Anesthesiology
Duke University Medical Center Division Chief, Cardiac Anesthesiology
Durham, North Carolina Director of Clinical Research
Program Director, Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology Fdlowship
Stefaan Bouchez, MD [22) Medical Director of Perfusion Services
Cardiac Anesthesiologist Yale School of Medicine
Ghent University Hospital New Haven, Connecticut
Ghent, Bdgium
x I Contributors
Linda D. Giiiam, MD, MPH, FACC, FASE, FESC [7] Prlya A. Kumar, MD [18]
Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Profusor
Atlantic Health System/Morristown Medical Center Director of Clinical ~eh
Professor of Medicine, Deparonent of Anesthesiology
Sidney Kimmd Medical College at Thomas University of North Carolina Hospital
Jefferson University Chapd Hill, North Carolina
Morristown, New Jersey
Ryan E. Lauer, MD [4]
Kathryn E. Glas, MD, MBA, FASE [13] Associate Professor
Professor Deparonent of Anesthesiology
Department of Anesthe.dology Loma Linda University Health
Emory University School of Medicine Loma Linda, California
Atlanta, Georgia
G. Burkhard Mackensen, MD, PhD, FASE [:Z3]
Katherine Grichnik. MD, MS, FASE [6] Profusor and Chief
Senior Vice President and ChiefMedical Officer Division of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia
Indian River Medical Center UW Medicine Research & Education Endowed Professor in
Vero Beach, Florida Anesthesiology
Deparonent of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine
Kimberly J. Howard-Quijano, MD, MS [:Z4] University ofWashington Medical Center
Academic Chief, Cardiac Anesthcsiology Seattle, Washington
Director, Translational Research
Department of Anesthcsiology & Pcriopcrative Medicine Aman Mahajan, MD, PhD, MBA [24]
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Perer and Eva Safar Profes&or and Chair
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Deparonent of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Director, University of Pimburgh Medical Center Periopcrative
Hillary B. Hrabak. BS, RDCS [3] Services
Cardiac Sonographer II Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Cardiac Diagnostic Unit
Duke University Medical Center Feroze Mahmood, MD [5, PE: Advanced TEE]
Durham, North Carolina Profes&or of Anesthesia
Division Chief, Cardiac and Vascular Anesthesia
Vidor Jebara, MD [14] Harvard Medical School
Professor of Surgery Boston, Massachusetts
Department ofThoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Hotd-Dieu de France Hospital
Saint Joseph University Leo Marcott, MD, FACC, FASE [7]
Beirut, Lebanon Assistant Professor of Medicine
Sidney Kimmd Medical College
Thomas Jefferson University
Rajiv Juneja MD, DA, MAMS [5]
Philaddphia, Pennsylvania
Director Cardiac Anesthesia & Critical Care
Medanta Institute of Critical Care & Anesthesia
Medanta The Mcdicity Jonathan B. Mark. MD [9, 26]
Gurgaon, India Profusor
Dcparonent of Anesthcsiology
Blaine A. Kent MD, FRCPC [15] Duke University Medical Center
Associate Professor of Anesthesiology Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Anesthesia Site Chief, Halifax Infirmary Hospital Durham, North Carolina
Director, Periopcrative Blood Management Services
Dalhousie University I Nova Scotia Health Authority Susan M. Martinelli, MD [18]
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Associate Professor
Deparonent of Anesthesiology
Konstantinos P. Koulogiannis, MD, FACC [7] University of North Carolina Hospital
Attending Cardiologist Chapd Hill, North Carolina
Morristown Medical Center
Morristown, New Jersey
Contributors I xi
Chandrlka Roysam, MD, FRCA [21] Ghassan Slellaty, MD, MSc [14]
Consultant Cardiothoracic Anesthcsiologist and lntcnsivist Surgeon
Fttcman Hospital Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom Hotcl-Dieu de France Hospital
Beirut, Lebanon
Zainab Samad, MD, MHS [2]
Associate Professor of Medicine Madhav Swaminathan, MD [15, 16, 25]
Chair, Department of Medicine, Profes&or of Anesthcsiology
Aga Khan University V= Chair of Faculty Development
Karachi, Pakistan Division of Cardiothoracic Anesthcsiology
Department of Ancsthesiology
Rebecca A. Schroeder, MD [9, 26] Duke University Medical Center
Associate Professor Durham, North Carolina
Department of Anesthcsiology
Duke University Medical Center Justlaan Swanevelder, MBChB, FCA(SA), FRCA,
Durham, North Carolina MMED (Anes) [10]
Profes&or and Head of Department
Svati H. Shah, MD, MHS, MS [22]
Consultant Ancsthesiologist
Associate Professor of Medicine
Department of Anesthesia and Periopcra.tive Medicine
Vice-Chief, Translational Research
University of Cape Town
Director, Adult Cardiovascular Genetics Clinic
Groote Schuur and Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospitals
Division of Cardiology, Department ofMcdicine
Cape Town, South Africa
Co-Director, Clinical Translation
Duke Molecular Physiology Institute
Duke University
Mark A. Taylor, MD, FASE [111
Chair, Surgical Operations
Durham, North Carolina
Clinical Associate of Anesthesiology
Stanton K. Shernan, MD, FAHA, FASE [13, 21] Clcvdand Clinic
Professor and Executive Vice Chair Clcvdand, Ohio
Department of Anesthcsiology, Periopcra.tive and Pain Medicine
Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvanl. Medical School Christopher A. Troianos, MD, FASE [11, 26]
Boston, Massachusetts Profes&or and Chair
Anesthesiology Institute
Saket Singh, MD [11] Clcvdand Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Vice Chair fur Quality Case Western Reserve University
Associate Program Director Clcvdand, Ohio
Department of Anesthcsiology
Allegheny Health Network Johannes van der Westhuizen, MBChB, MMed
Clinical Associate Professor [10]
Temple University School ofMedicine Session Consultant Anesthesiologist
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Department of Anesthesiology
University of the Free State
Joseph A. Sivak, MD, FACC [2] Haumann and Partners
Assistant Professor ofMedicine Bloemfontein, South Africa
Division of Cardiology
Department of Medicine Patrick Wouters, MD, PhD [22]
University of North Carolina Clinical and Academic Head
Chapel Hill, North Carolina Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine
Profes&or of Clinical Physiology
Nfkolaos I. Skubas, MD, DSc, FASE, FACC [20] Ghent University and University Hospital
Department Chairman Ghenc, Belgium
Department of Cardiothoracic Ancsthcsiology
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio
Foreword
Over the past 60 years, echocardiography has become the most important and widely used
imaging modality in cardiovascular medicine. And even though the core technology still re-
lies on the same fundamental physical properties of reflected waves, the variety of innova-
tions and applications that have evolved to enable sophisticated imaging of cardiac structure
and function in three-dimensional space is astonishing. The underlying principles are simple
enough: ultrasound waves are sent from a transducer, then the reflected waves are analyzed
in two domains: a time-intensity domain (to characterize the structure) and a frequency-shift
domain (to assess the speed of motion). With modern transducer technology and computer
processing speeds, echo images have greater spatial and temporal resolution than ever, and
the usefulness of echo across all forms of cardiovascular disease is without parallel. One can-
not be a cardiovascular specialist without an in-depth knowledge of echocardiography.
This volume goes a long way to addressing this need. While transthoracic echocardiog-
raphy is the initial approach for the majority of clinical conditions, transesophageal echo-
cardiography (TEE) remains essential since its introduction in the 1980s, as it provides im-
ages with much higher resolution, particularly in the cardiac base and in technically difficult
studies. This is crucial in the care of the critically ill patient or during cardiac interventions,
where diagnostic accuracy is paramount. Ors. Joseph P. Mathew, Alina Nicoara, Chakib M.
Ayoub, and Madhav Swaminathan lay a solid foundation for understanding the intricacies
of transesophageal echocardiography, from the basic principles of ultrasound to various
clinical applications of TEE, including its role in the critically ill, in monitoring heart function
in the operative theater, and in evaluating the immediate results of cardiac procedures.
This third edition of Clinical Manual and Review ofTransesophageal Echocardiography ac-
complishes the difficult task of speaking with ease to both the novice and the expert, while
updating the text of their second edition to include recent improvements in the field, in-
clusive of strain imaging. The authors cover all the novel uses of three-dimensional imag-
ing with a focus on those that apply to valvular heart surgery and the critical care setting,
offering wisdom accumulated through long experience. The illustrations and instructional
videos included with this volume reflect the authors' deep expertise in both the technique
and the teaching ofTEE; questions at the end of chapters and the TEE practice exams will
help prepare those who intend on taking certification examinations. This third edition also
incorporates a superb online supplement with instructional videos.
In short, this clinical manual and review of transesophageal echocardiography will en-
lighten the reader and promote the expert application of transesophageal echocardiogra-
phy in the care of high-risk patients.
William A. Zoghbi MD, FASE, MACC
Professor and Chair, Department of Cardiology
Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center
Houston Methodist Hospital
This page intentionally left blank
Preface
The third edition of the Clinical Manual and Review of Transesophageal Echocardiogra-
phy is intended to be an indispensable resource and the standard reference manual in
the field of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Completely updated, reorganized,
and expanded, this edition has been redesigned to offer anesthesiologists, cardiolo-
gists, cardiothoracic surgeons, emergency room physicians, intensivists, and sonogra-
phers a concise yet comprehensive coverage of the key principles, concepts, and cur-
rent practices in TEE.
Since the publication of the first edition in 2005, and the second edition in 2010, the
field has witnessed continuous growth at a rapid pace. Preparing the third edition was a
complex undertaking, as we attempted to balance content, format, style, integration, and
innovation, while recognizing the need to stay in the zone between excessively complex
and over simplified.
This edition features a sectional format, each containing chapters that were reviewed
and updated to provide a comprehensive discussion of the physiology, pathophysiology,
and echocardiographic approach for normal and common disease states. Whenever pos-
sible, important clinical information has been aligned with the principles of cardiovascu-
lar physiology, and echocardiographic techniques. In addition, narrative text, charts, and
graphs have been effectively integrated to provide rapid access to key clinical information
for the purpose of improving clinical management. With a dedicated section highlighting
the practice exam along the numerous multiple-choice questions after almost every chap-
ter, in addition to the online instructional videos provided to our readers, this edition will
serve as an excellent source of current clinical information on TEE for trainees and more ex-
perienced anesthesiologists preparing for board examinations in both basic and advanced
perioperative echocardiography.
In addition to several distinguished new authors, we welcome Dr. Alina Nicoara as a co-
editor. We have been privileged to collaborate with an outstanding group of colleagues
that are prominent experts in their fields. We are grateful and acknowledge their hard work,
dedication, selfless commitment and valued contributions in this collective responsibility.
It is their excellence, attention to detail, passion for echocardiography, and vast knowledge
and experience that allowed this project to proceed smoothly. We are also thankful to the
many readers of the first and second editions who offered words of encouragement and
even advice on how the book could be improved-many of those suggestions have been
incorporated into the current edition. Despite the changes, however, we hope that we
have retained the elements that made the first two editions successful.
Finally, we once again recognize and are indebted to our mentors-those who in-
stilled in us the passion for echocardiography. We gratefully acknowledge the contribu-
tions of Drs. Dinesh Kurian, Martin Sigurdsson, and Nathan Waldron in reviewing all of the
questions and answers in the book. Our sincere appreciation also goes to our assistants,
xvi I Preface
Melinda Macalino, Jaime Cooke, and Rabih Mukalled, for their dedication, enthusiasm, and patience.
In addition, we would like to thank the staff at McGraw-Hill including Brian Belval, Andrew Moyer, Jason
Malley and Christie Naglieri for their continued support with this project.
Joseph P. Mathew
Alina Nicoara
Chakib M. Ayoub
Madhav Swaminathan
Fundamentals of Echocardiography
This page intentionally left blank
Physics of Two-Dimensional
and Doppler Imaging
Brian P. Barrick, Mihai V. Podgoreanu, and Edward K. Prokop
......._.--+--+-~----'--+-+-1-+~--......_1-+-+-~ Distllnce
Amplitude
FIGURE 1-1. Physical parameters describing continuous and pulsed ultrasound waves.
signal. These are emitted from the transducer during that time-of-flight increases by 13 µs for every 1 cm
the "on" time and are received during the "off" time. of depth of the reflector. This value is important for
One pulse typically consists of three to five cycles. imaging and for Doppler US.
Pulsed US can be described by five parameters
(Fig. 1-1): Propagation of Ultrasound
• Pulse duration: The time a pulse is "on," which is Through Tissues
very short (0.5 to 3 µs). The most important effect of a medium on the US
• Pulse repetition period: The time from the start of wave is attenuation--the gradual decrease in intensity
one pulse to the start of the next pulse, which includes (measured in dB) of an US wave. Attenuation results
the listening time. Typical values are 0.1 to 1 ms. from three processes:
• Spatial pulse length: The distance from the start to • Absorption: conversion of sound energy to heat
the end of a pulse (0.1 to 1 mm).
energy.
• Duty factor. The percentage of time the transducer • Scattering: diffuse spread of sound from a border
is activdy transmitting US, usually 0.1 % to 1%. This
with small irregularities.
means that the transducer dement acts as a receiver
over 99% of the time. • Rdlection: return of sound to the transducer from
a rdatively smooth border between two media. It is
• Pulse repetition frequency (PRF): The number reflection that is important for imaging.
of pulses that occur in 1 second, expressed in Hz.
PRF is reciprocal to pulse repetition period. Typical Different tissues attenuate by different processes
values are 1OOO to 10,000 Hz (not to be confused and at different rates:
with the frequency of the US within a pulse, which • Air bubbles reflect much of the US that engages
is many times greater). them and appear very echo dense (bright). Because
PRF is inversdy proportional to imaging depth. sound attenuates the most in air, information distal
Because sound takes time to propagate, a deeper to an air bubble is often lost as a result.
image requires more listening time. Therefore, with • Lung, being mostly air filled, causes much scatter and
a deeper image, the transducer can emit fewer pulses results in the most attenuation of US by tissue.
per second. This concept will also be important for • Bone absorbs and reflects US, resulting in somewhat
the discussion of Doppler ultrasound. less attenuation than lung.
The rdation between the depth of a reflector and
• Soft tissue and blood attenuate even less than bone.
the time it takes for an US pulse to travd from the
transducer to the reflector and hack to the transducer • Water attenuates sound very little, mostly by
(time-of-flight) is called the range equation: absorption, with very little reflection. It is therefore
very echo lucent (appears black on images).
distance to reflector (mm)= propagation speed (mm/o6)
· time-of-flight (o6)/2 Within soft tissue, attenuation is proportional to
both the US frequency and path length, and can be
This allows the US system to calculate the distance expressed by the following equation:
to a certain structure by measuring only the time-of-
flight. Assuming that soft tissue has a uniform propa- Attenuation (dB)= 05 dB/(cm ·MHz)·
gation speed of 1540 m/s, or 1.54 mm/µs, this means path length (cm)· frequency (MHz)
PHYSICS OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL AND DOPPLER IMAGING I 5
Focal length
--- --
Focal
zone
Tr•nsducer Type lm•ge Shape Steering Technique Focusing Technique Crystal Defect
Mechanical Sector Mechanical Fixed Image loss
Linear switched array Rectangular None Fixed Vertical line dropout
Linear phased array Sector Electronic Electronic Poor steering and focusing
Annular phased array Sector Mechanical Electronic Horizontal line dropout
Convex sequential array Blunted sector None Fixed Vertical line dropout
Convex phased array Blunted sector Electronic Electronic Poor steering and focusing
Vector array Flat top sector Electronic Electronic Poor steering and focusing
Matrix array Sector Electronic Electronic Poor steering and focusing
Reproduced with permission from Edelman SK: Understanding Ultrasound Physics, 3rd ed. Woodlands, TX: Education for the
Sonographic Professional, Inc; 2004.
3. Comprt:ssion: reduces the dynamic range of the • Two-dimensional imaging is a line of B-mode
signals to match the dynamic range of the sys- echo data moved in an arc through a section of
tem's dectrical components. Does not change tissue in a back-and-forth fashion. This can be
the relative value of the returning signals. achieved with mechanical or dectronic steering
4. Demodulation: makes the image more suitable of the B-mode echo beam. Images are generated
as a series of frames displayed in rapid fashion to
for viewing.
produce the impression of constant motion.
a. Rectification converts all returning signals
into positive amplitude.
• Tluft,.dimensional imaging displays pyramidal
datasets consisting of volume elements or vox-
b. Smoothing converts signal bursts into a sin- els. The 30 datasets appear three-dimensional
gle deflection for each reflector on the 20 display monitors by creating the per-
5. Rejection: elimination of low-level signals. ception of depth through a range of colors and
Display: Formerly a cathode ray tube, now usually opacities.
consists of a computer monitor screen.
Determinants of Two-
Storage media: Archiving of data (optical disk,
DVD, network server). Dimensional Resolution
Muter synchronizer. Integrates all the individual The ability of an US system to image accuratdy is
components of the system. termed rt:solution. Spatial rt:solution is defined as the
minimum separation between two reflectors where
Ultrasound Imaging they can still be identified as different structures.
Spatial resolution has been described in terms of dis-
The modes of displaying returning echoes are as follows: tinguishing structures parallel to the US beam (lon-
A (amplitude) mock: No longer used in clinical gitutljtud or mtUd rt:solution) or perpendicular to the
echocardiography. Displays upward deflections with US beam (14teral Tt:solution).
height proportional to the amplitude of the return- Synonyms for longitudinal resolution include
ing echo and location proportional to the depth of axial radial range, and depth (LARRD). Synonyms
the reflector (x-axis: reflector depth; y-axis: ampli- for lateral resolution include angular, transverse, and
tude of echo). This mode only displays one scan line. azimuth (LATA).
B (brightness) mode: Displays spots with bright- Longitudinal resolution = spatial pulse length/2.
ness proportional to the amplitude of the echo and Therefore, longitudinal resolution can be improved
location proportional to the depth of the reflector by shortening the spatial pulse length. Given the same
(x-axis: reflector depth; z-axis: amplitude of echoes; number of cycles per pulse, higher-frequency US will
there is no y-axis). B mode echocardiography can result in a shorter pulse length. Longitudinal resolu-
be further classified as follows: tion is typically better than lateral resolution.
Lateral resolution is approximately equal to the
• M (motion) mock:: A continuous B-mode dis- US beam diameter, and it is best at the focus point
play. Displays one scan line versus time. Allows where the beam is the narrowest. The distance from
for a high frame rate, accuracy of linear mea- the transducer to the focus point represents the focal
surements, and tracking of motion of reflectors length. Focal length is directly proportional with the
(x-axis: time; y-axis: reflector depth). frequency and the transducer diameter. Therefore,
8 I CHAPTER 1
SMHz
lOMHz
lOMHz ~~-.-C.: -
/\ -
Spatial
- - -
Temporal
-
FIGURE 1-5. Transducer size, frequency, and foca l resolution resolution
depth. Sing le focus
Multlfocus Minimize llne density
High llne density Minimize Imaging depth
higher US frequency will result in a deeper area of Use narrow sector
fucu.s (Fig. 1-5) and less divergence in the far field.
Note that both longitudinal and lateral ~1u FIGURE 1-7. Relation between frame rate, spatial
tions are improved. with high-frequency US. In choo.t- n!Solutlon, and temporal resolution. Improving temporal
ing the settings of an US syatem, there i.s a tradeoff resolution Is achieved at the expense ofspatial resolution.
between the ability to obtain high-r.:esolution images
and the ability to image deeper structures (Fig. 1-6). 3. Using a nanow sector
The ability to accurately locate moving structures 4. Minimizing line density
at a gi~n time is termed tmtporrd molulion. Temporal
resolution is proportional to the numbers of frames Because using multifucus imaging and high line
per second (foz71U! rate). Factors that improve temporal density results in better lateral resolution, improved
resolution (f,y increasing the frame rate) an:: temporal resolution is achieved. at the expense of spa-
tial resolution {Fig. 1-7).
1. Minimizing imaging depth
2. Uang single fuc::us imaging (one pulse/line) Harmonic Imaging
.& ultrasound travels through tissue, it generates addi-
Ultruound
tional sound frequencies, which are multiple, or har-
frequenq monics, of the transmitted frequency. The farther the
US travels, the more harmonics it producc.s. By prop-
erly filtering the returning signal, which contains the
harmonic frequencies, an US machine equipped for
0 harmonic imaging can selectively display images cre-
ated with harmonic energy.
/\
The tcccption of the transmitted ultrasound at the
second hannonic (double) fu:qucncy improves tissue
visualization. especially in situations of poor-quality
imaging with fundamental fu:qucncy, by enhancing
both myocardial and valvular tissue. Normal structures
- - -
Image quality
- - -
Attenuation (tissue
may appear abnormally thickened; therefore, care should
be taken on interpreting harmonic images. Harmonic
imaging also in~ the signal-to-noise ratio and lim-
(resolution) penetration) ia the creation of anifu:ts, cspccially in the proximity of
the transducer (near ficld) 6 (see Chap~ 6).
PRINCIPLES OF DOPPLER
FIGURE 1-#J. Relation between ultrasound frequency, ULTRASOUND
image resolution, and tissue penetration. Image resolu-
The Doppler effect is defined as the eh~ in the fre-
tion improves at higher frequencies, but at the expense
quency of sound emitted or reflected by a moving
of tissue penetration.
PHYSICS OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL AND DOPPLER IMAGING I 9
object. The amount of change is termed the Doppler Spectral Doppler (in contrast to color Doppler)
shift. It is imponant to note that though both the can be further divided into pulsed wave and continu-
transmitted and reflected frequency are ultrasonic ous wave.
(MHz range), the actual Doppler shift is in the audi-
ble range (20 to 20,000 Hz). Pulsed Wave Doppler
The most common applications of Doppler US
are to measure vdocity (magnitude and direction) of Pulsed wave Doppler uses one crystal that alternates
blood flow and, more recently, tissue. The Doppler between sending and receiving an US beam. A timed
equation is as follows: pulse allows sampling from a discrete area of about 1
to 3 mm, sdected by the operator, known as the sample
Doppler shift (expressed in Hz) = (2 · v · Fi cosine 0)/c volume. This allows for range discrimination (Fig. 1-8).
Because the same dement acts as both sender and
• v = the vdocity of the moving object receiver, the transducer must wait fur the pulse to com-
=
• Fi the incident frequency, or frequency emitted by plete a round trip before emitting another pulse. As
the transducer an example, if the sampling volume is S cm from the
• 9 = the anid.e between the incident US beam and the probe, the transducer must wait 65 µs (10 cm/154,000
direction of movement cm/sec) befure sending the next pulse.
• c = the propagation speed of US in the medium (a Because sampling is intermittent, the pulse repeti-
constant 1540 m/s in soft tissue) tion frequency limits the maximum Doppler shift (and
thus maximum velocity) that can be measured accu-
If the object is moving directly toward (9 =
0°) rately. Velocities higher than this maximum vdocity
or away from (0 = 180°) the transducer and v is will appear to wrap around on the display, a phenom-
expressed in units of m/s, then cosine 9 is I and the enon known as aliasing (see Chapter 5). The Doppler
equation simplifies to: frequency shift at which aliasing occurs, equal to PRF
divided by 2, is termed the Nyquist limit.
Doppler shift= (v· Fi)/770
For example, if a 5-MHz transducer can only send
Because the Doppler shift varies with the cosine of out about 15,000 pulses per second, the Nyquist limit
the angle of beam incidence (9), the maximum mea- is 7500 Hz (15,000/2). Using the velocity equation
surable velocity decreases as 9 increases. When move- shown earlier, the maximum velocity that can be
ment is perpendicular (90 degrees) to the beam, no measured without aliasing is about I.IS m/s (770 X
Doppler shift is detected. Therefore, only measure- (7500/5,000,000)).
ments obtained with (9) smaller than 20 degrees are Methods to avoid aliasing include:
considered accurate. 1. Using continuous wave Doppler (described later)
In practice, the machine measures a Doppler shift 2. Changing the view to bring the area of interest
and cal.culates a velocity. It also assumes 9 is 0 degrees
closer to the probe (shallower depth)
or 90 degrees. Rearranging the simplified Doppler
equation to reflect this gives us the following: 3. Using a transducer with a lower incident fre-
quency (results in lower Doppler shift for given
v = 770· (Doppler shift/Fi) flow vdocity; see the equation earlier)
4. Adjusting the scale to its maximum
When reflected (backscatter) signals are received at 5. Moving the baseline up or down (makes the pic-
the transducer, the difference between the transmitted ture "prettier" but does not eliminate aliasing)
and reflected frequency is determined, analyzed by fast
Fourier transform, and then displayed on the screen as From a practical standpoint, pulsed wave Doppler
a Doppler envelope. This process is known as spectral should be used when measuring relatively low-flow
analysis and results in a display of the following: velocities ( < ~ 1.2 m/s) in specific areas of interest
(e.g., pulmonary vein flow, mitral valve inflow).
• Direction of blood flow: Flow toward the trans- Compared to imaging ultrasound, pulsed wave
ducer results in an increased frequency (positive Doppler requires greater output power, longer pulse
Doppler shift displayed above the baseline), whereas lengths, and a higher pulse repetition frequency.
flow away from the transducer results in a decreased When the velocity of the tissue becomes the object of
frequency (negative Doppler shift displayed below measurement (Doppler tissue imaging), the system is set
the baseline) as a low-pass filter. This means that low-vdocity, high-
• Velocity of frequency shift amplitude signals are preferentially displayed. Doppler
• Signal amplitude tissue imaging is discussed in more detail in Chapter 5.
I0 I CHAPTER 1
. . .-... t _;
Nodopplershlft _____. velocity
(Nyquist limit) '\,.
- \.
··--1
FIGURE 1-10. Characteristics of color flow maps.
of flow and the magnitude of the Doppler shift are MI (> 1) sound beams result in bubble disruption
displayed as color maps, which can be ve/Qdty maps (extreme nonlinear behavior).
or varilln" maps (Fig. 1·10). A variance map contains The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
information on the quality of flow (i.e., laminar vs. limits the maximum intensity output of cardiac ultra-
turbulent); however, turbulent flow and signal alias- sound systems to less than 720 W/cm2 due to con~
ing will result in an apparent wide range of vdocities. cerns of possible tissue and neurological dam.age from
Also, in the case of color Bow Doppler, aliasing may mechanical injury.
introduce confusion as to the direction of flow. Color
flow and spectral Doppler are set as a high-pass filter
to eliminate tissue motion artifacts. REVIEW QUESTIONS1-3,s
A typical (but not uniform) convention for color
Doppler velocity maps is for red to indicate flow Basics of Ultrasound
toward the probe and fur blue to indicate flow away Select the one best answer for each item.
from the probe (BART= Blue Away, Red Toward).
A region that is black on color flow Doppler imag- 1. Which of the following is not an acoustic variable?
ing represents an area where there is no measured a. Pressure
Doppler shift. b. Density
c. Distance
d. Intensity
BIOEFFECTS 2. Which of tbe following sound wave frequencies is
US bioeffect:s include thmnal 4/'tcts and cavitation. ultrasonic?
In addition, mechanical effects (Vibration) may be of a. lOHz
concern. Thermal bwtjftas consist of a temperature b. lOMHz
elevation resulting from the absorption and scatter· c. lOkHz
ing of US by biologic tissue and is related to beam d. 10,000 Hz
intensity (tbe spatial peak and temporal average 3. An increase in tbe strength of tbe US pulse will
[SP'TA] intensity). The SPTA limits are 100 mW/cm2 increase:
fur unfocused beams and 1000 mW/cm2 fur fucwed a. Frequency
beams. Cavittllirm resulu from the interaction of US b. Intensity
with microscopic gag bubbles. Stable cavitation refer& c. Pulse duration
to forces that cause the bubbles to contract and d. Pulse repetition &cquenc:y
expand. Transient cavitation results in breaking the
bubbles and releasing energy, producing perhaps more 4. If imaging depth decrease&, pulse repetition fre-
pronounced c£rccts on tissues at tbe microscopic level. quency:
The mechanical irulex (Ml), a calculated and unitless a. Decreases
number, is used to convey the likelihood of bioef.. b. Does not change
fects from cavitation. At low MI (<O.I) the mic~ c. Increases
bubbles expand and contra.et in a linear fashion. High. d. Varies
12 I CHAPTER 1
c. Scattering c. 1/2
d. All of the above d. 3/4
21. Compared with backscatter, specular reflections are: 4. All of the following are true of linear switched or
a. Diffuse sequential arrays except:
b. Random a. Produces a rectangular image display
c. Well seen when sound strikes the reflector at 90 b. Defective crystal creates a line of dropout from
degrees top to bottom
d. Occur when the wavelength is larger than the c. Has a fixed transmit focus
irregularities in the boundary d. Elements are fired in a sequence to create an
22. Pulsed ultrasound is described by: image
a. Duty factor
5. In a phased array transducer, beam steering and
b. Repetition frequency
c. Spatial length focusing are produced by:
d. All of the above a. Manually rotating the transducer
b. Mechanically rotating the transducer
23. Pulse repetition frequency: c. Changing the timing of pulses to the piezoelec-
a. Is determined by the sound source and the medium tric elements
b. Can be changed by the sonographer d. Changing the resonant frequency of the piezo-
c. Increases as imaging depth increases electric elements
d. Is directly proportional to the pulse repetition
period 6. In an M-mode tracing, the x-axis represents:
a. Depth
24. When a sound beam strikes a reflector at 90 degrees b. Time
incidence, it is considered: c. Amplitude
a. Obtuse d. Frequency
b. Oblique
c. Normal 7. The damping material in an ultrasound transducer
d. Acute increases the following:
25. Sound waves can be characterized as: a. Pulse duration
a. Electrical b. Spatial pulse length
c. Duty factor
b. Transverse
c. Longitudinal d. Bandwidth
d. Spectral 8. The region or zone between the transducer and the
focal point is known as the:
Ultrasound Transducers a. Farzone
Select the one best answer for each item. b. Fresnel zone
c. Fraunhofer zone
1. Which piezoelectric effect does an US transducer d. Focal zone
use during the transmission phase?
a. Doppler effect 9. At the focus, the beam diameter is:
b. Reverse piezoelectric effect a. One-fourth the transducer diameter
c. Direct piezoelectric effect b. Half the transducer diameter
d. Indirect piezoelectric effect c. Double the transducer diameter
d. Equal to the transducer diameter
2. The most common piezoelectric material currently
used includes all of the following except: 10. In a linear phased array transducer:
a. Lead a. Image shape is a blunted sector
b. Zirconate b. Steering is mechanical
c. Titanate c. Focusing is electronic
d. Tourmaline d. A crystal defect produces a vertical line dropout
3. The optimal thickness for the matching layer as a 11. All of the following statements are true regarding
fraction of the wavelength is: the advantages of the backing material except:
a. 1/8 a. It decreases the Q factor
b. 114 b. It increases the spatial pulse length
14 I CHAPTER 1
7. Doppler wall motion fdters are: 12. The color map shown here is a:
a. Lowpass
b. High pass
c. Zero pass
d. Onepass
8. The maximal detectable freque.acy shift. or one-half
of the PRF, is known as:
a. Doppler effect
b. Propagation speed
c. Nyquist limit
d. Peak Doppler shift
9. The following pulsed Doppler spectral display
demonstrates:
...:•:
.=·-z-~ Sef"Y.'5 ·"'·- E
~· --.
-F:
.. 1;:•
~'
HC ~ ~ z .- E ":'.,.,~
:=t•l:O:'t:
~- . .....
::~_T 64
: :: o9E33 El 21' ~ SS
;4 ;2
:4 :~ "'
·F
'
a. Normal map
- -·•1 .-
,
,-- _, / b. Velocity map
v
" :: .
~
+ :z~ c. Variance map
d. Aliased map
13. The color map shown here is a:
~
;:r ::~
..
\'41 l'\·'"
,• o),
-I1~-_J.
, f ..... '
I or: :z
i~
..
_:, z. 3.2$:"1
• 2
,,
D::L~ · ... ; ; ,·;~ . ~ Ee~·;
a. Reverberation
b. .Aliasing
c. Mirroring
d. Side lobe
10. Color flow Doppler measw:es the:
a. Peak velocity
b. Mean velocity
c. Modal velocity
d. Instant2neous velocity
11. When color flow Doppler is used, the number of
US pulses per scan line is called:
a. Line density a. Normal map
b. Fwnerate b. Velocity map
c. Nyquist limit c. Variance map
d. Packet size d. Aliased map
16 I CHAPTER 1
14. In the figure, the anow points to a region (black) 16. If the alWing velocity of the color scale shown here
wbcrc: is 40 emfs, laminar flow toward the probe at 50
cm/a would appear:
REFERENCES
I. Edelman SK. Untinndrulint Ulmtmnul Phpif:t. 3rd ed. Wood·
lands, TX: Education for die Sonographlc Profcaslo11ial, Inc.;
2004.
2. Edelman SK. U"""'11unJ Physia ltnd IMnRnnlt41io11. Wood-
lancl.. TX: Educ;adon lOr die Sonographlc Profuulonal, Inc.;
2007.
3. Weyman AE. Princi/la aNl Prtzai&e of&hot4rrli"f!t1Pby. Phila-
delphia, PA: Lea&: Pebigcr, 1993.
4. Jungwinh B, M~ GB. R.eal·tlme 3-dlmenslo11al edio·
carcl.iography l.n the operating room. Smt/11 O.wlillthtJrt1e V.-
Bioaffects An.mh. 2008;12(4):248-264.
5. Salgo IS. T~111io11al cchocanliographic tt.chnology.
Select the one but answer for each item. CttnlWI Ciin. 2007;25(2):231-239.
6. Ca!dahl K. Kart.am E, IJclbctg J, et al. New concept In cchocar-
1. The most relevant intensity with respect to tissue diography: harmonic imaging of tissue without the usc of con-
heating is: uast agent. Lwwer. 1'98;352(9136):1264-1270.
a. Spatial peak temporal average (SPTA)
b. Spatial peak temporal peak (SPTP)
The TEE Probe
Joseph A. Sivak, Jose Rivera, and Zainab Samad
STRUCTURE AND DESIGN The modern TEE probe consists of the following
components (sec Fig. 2-1).
Transesophageal echocardiogtaphy (TEE) presents
a uni'lue opportunity to overcome the limitations
posed by chest wall acoustic windows while allowing Probe Tip
visualization of cardiac structures with greater spatial TEE probe tips are miniaturized (adult 3D probes:
~lution. Since its first reported use to evaluate intra- -17 X 13.5 X 38 mm and infantlpediatric probes:
cardiac flow in 1971 and to visualize cardiac structures -7.5 X 5.5 X 18.5 nun) and feature smooth contours
in 1976, the TEE probe has undergone remarkable to allow safe and comfonable insertion into the
technological advancement in terms of imaging capa- oroph.arynx. The acoustic lena and matrix array are
bility and probe structure and design. l.2 The TEE bowed in the probe tip. Modern TEE probes typi-
probe used by Frazin et al1 consisted of an M-mode cally have an extended operating frequency range of
transducer attached to a coaxial cable. Souquet et al3 approximately 3 to 7 MHz with a 90-degree field of
then rcponed suc:ccssful use of a phased array trans- view and usually allow 180 degrees of electronic rota-
ducer attached to the end of a gastroscope, which, tion. The probe tip can also be flexed, extended, and
in addition to producing tw<Kiimcnsional images, angled left or right using dials on the probe handle.
allowed for finer control of the transducer position by Generally, probes are capable of fl.exion of up to 120
using the flcxi.on and angling controls akin to a gastro- degrees, cxtcruion of 60 degrees, and 45 degrees of
scope. The biplane transducer was then introduced in leftlriitht angulation, with some variation between
1984, followed by the multiplane transducer in 1992:' manutacturers. TEE probes with three-<ilmensional
Consistent technological developments, including the imaging capabilities allow fur live, zoom, biplane,
introduction of a 8aible endoscope, probe tempera- and multibeat acquisition with or without color
rure regulation, miniatwi7.ation, transducer design, Doppler. Three-dimensional imaging is possible by
addition of color and spectral Doppler, and three-- performing a signmcant portion of beam forming
dimensional imaging, have led to the widespread within the transducer in highly specialized integrated
adoption of TEE in clinical care. Currently TEE circuits, which enable the fitting of thousands of
accounts for approximatdy 5% to 10% of echocardio- piezoelectric elements into the tip of the transducer
grapbic procedures. s (sec Chapter 23).
Dlstaltlp
Probe Shaft the echo system will run an automatic calibration algo--
rith.m when the probe is nrst connected with the echo
The TEE probe shaft houses flexible, mini-coaxial machine. It is generally recommended that the probe
cables carrying signals to and from the transducers. tip position be neutral when this connection is made.
The probe shaft is about 6 to 10 mm in diameter and
0.7 to 1 m in length and is designed to be flexible and
durable with some degree of bite resistance. The probe PROBE INSERTION AND SAFETY
shaft is labeled with markers that allow assessment Indications for TEE
of the depth of esophageal intubation. The depth
markers at 20 to 30 cm roughly correspond to upper Before assessing whether a patient is a suitable can-
esopbagcal views, 30 to 40 cm to mid-esophageal didate for a TEE, it is prudent to first determine
views, 40 to 45 cm to transgastric views, and 45 to the appropriateness of the indication fur the study.
50 cm to deep transgastric: views. General indications for TEE include assessment of
lefHtrial appendage thrombus, atrial masses, detailed
inspection of valvular pathology, and diagnosis of
Handle endocarditis or cardioembolic source. More recently,
The band.le of the TEE probe houses the controls TEE has been used to provide anatomical guid-
needed to perform dectronic steering of the imaging ance fur percutaneous valve procedures, such as the
elements and mechanical steering of the TEE probe MitraClip procedurc.6 In 2011 a multi.society joint
tip. There arc typically two round dials. The larger guideline was published fur the a~propriate use of
dial allows £lc::x:ion and extension movements of the echocardiography, including TEE. Indications for
probe tip, and the smaller dial allows fur right and left the study were scored on a sCale of 1 to 9, and indica-
movements of the probe tip. In addition, the handle tions with a score of 7 to 9 were considered appropri-
houses two button controls that hdp with dect.ronic ate (A = benefit outweighed risk), whereas those with
steering. Ultrasound equipment manufacturers try a score of 4 to 6 were considered uncertain (U), and
to optimize the ergonomics of the handle to perm.it those with a score of 1 to 3 were considered inappro-
fur an easy one-handed operation. Design feature priate (I = risk outweighed benefit). Table 2-1 shows
i~rovements such as the introduction of a slim, the appropriateness score for indications commonly
Ii tweight handle, textured. no-slip grip, and acccs- encountered in clinical practice. Practice guidelines
si ility of controls have made it more user fiiendly. fur the use of perioperative TEE8 recommend that fur
adult patients without contraindications, TEE should
be used in all open heart (e.g., valvula.r procedures)
Connector
and thoracic aortic surgical procedures, and should be
The connector contains an array of pins, which attach considered in coronary artery bypass graft surgeries as
to the echo machine (see Fig. 2-2). It is connected to well "in order to confirm and refine the preoperative
the probe handle via the transducer cable. Typically. diagnosis, to detect new or unsuspec.ted pathology, to
20 I CHAPTER 2
Approprllte
• Guidance during percutaneous noncoronary cardiac interventions, including but not limited to closure device placement,
radiofrequency ablation, and percutaneous valve procedures. (A 9)
• Suspected acute aortic pathology, including but not limited to dissection/transection. (A 9)
• Evaluation of valwlar structure and function to assess suitability for, and assist in planning of, an intervention. (A 9)
• To diagnose infective endocarditis with a moderate or high pretest probability (e.g~ Staphylococcus bacterernia, fungemia,
prosthetic heart valve, or intracardiac device). (A 9)
• Atrial fibrillation/flutter: evaluation to facilitate clinical decision making with regard to anticoagulation, cardioversion, and/
or radiofrequency ablation. (A 9)
• Use ofTEE when there is a high likelihood of a nondiagnostic TTE due to patient characteristics or inadequate visualization
of relevant structures. (A 8)
• Re-evaluation of prior TEE finding for interval change (e.g., resolution of thrombus after anticoagulation, resolution of veg-
etation after antibiotic therapy) when a change in therapy is anticipated. (A 8)
• Evaluation for cardiovascular source of embolus with no identified noncardiac source. (A 7)
• To diagnose infective endocarditis with a low pretest probability (e.g., transient fever, known alternative source of infection,
or negative blood cultures/atypical pathogen for endocarditis). (13)
• Routine assessment of pulmonary veins in an asymptomatic patient status post pulmonary vein isolation. (13)
• Atrial fibrillation/flutter: evaluation when a decision has been made to anticoagulate and not to perform cardioversion. (12)
• Surveillance of prior TEE finding for interval change (e.g., resolution of thrombus after anticoagulation, resolution of vegeta-
tion after antibiotic therapy) when no change in therapy is anticipated. (12)
• Routine use of TEE when a diagnostic TTE is reasonably anticipated to resolve all diagnostic and management concerns. (11)
Data from American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force; American Society of Echocardiography, et al:
ACCF/ASEiAHA/ASNCJHFSA/HRS/SCAl/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography. A Report of the Ameri-
can College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American Heart
Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular
Angiography and Interventions, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardio-
vascular Magnetic Resonance American College of Chest Physicians, J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011 Mar;24(3):229-267.
adjust the anesthetic and surgical plan accordingly, obtain superior-quality images, whereas TIE imaging
and to assess the results of the surgical intervention." is often limited by sound attenuation from air through
In recent years, TEE in the perioperative period the chest wall acoustic windOWli. In one study the aver~
has been invaluable in guiding percutaneous valve age time to reach a diagnosis by TEE was 11 minutes,
procedures such as placement of the transcatheter and the etiology of refractory hrJ'otension was clearly
aonic valve and mitral clip. Indeed, the first setting identified in 76% of patients. As more anesthesi-
in which perioperative TEE was widdy adopted and ologists have become skilled in the performance and
routindy employed was the cardiac surgical operating interpretation of TEE, its use during noncardiac sur-
room. In a large prospective cohort study, Mishra and gery has increased. In a cohort of 98 patients with high
colleagues found that 36% of 5016 cardiac surgical cardiac risk undergoing a broad range of noncardiac
patients beneficed from a pre-bypass TEE study and surgery, Schulmeyer and colleagues found that TEE
a similar number from a post-bypass study.9 The TEE hdped guide intraoperative and/or postoperative man-
examination was most useful for identification of intra.- agement in all but 2 patients.11 Suriani and coworkers
cardiac thrombus, aortic atheroma. mitral leaflet con- reported their use of TEE in 123 cases of orthotopic
figuration, changes in valvular function, and in guiding liver transplant. 12 In 15% of cases, TEE was critical in
de-airing procedures before separation from bypass. altering surgical or anesthetic technique, treating life~
In some centers, TEE has replaced transthoracic threatening events, or directing further postoperative
echocardiography (TTE) as the preferred initial imag- evaluation. In this population, TEE also can be useful
ing study in postcardiac surgery patients requiring in diagnosing hepatopulmonary syndrome by identify-
emergent evaluation. This is because of its ability to ing bubbles in the pulmonary veins after a bubble test.
THE TEE PROBE I 21
TEE is of proven value in eval~ hemodynami- to proceed to further radiological imaging if the clini-
cally unstable patients. Feierman13 reported the we of cal suspicion of aortic pathology remains high.18,21-23
inttaopetative TEE to identify unsU&pcctcd dynamic left
venaicular outflow tract obstruction, thereby allowing Risks of the TEE Procedure
crucial rcdircc.tion of management sttatcgy. In addi-
tion, Brandt and usociatcs reviewed 66 cases in which TEE is generally a well-tolerated and safe procedure.
intraopcrative TEE was cmcrgently applied w diagnose However, because of its semi-invasive nature, "blind
severe lefi: ventricular dysfunction, aortic dissection, new intubation," and the need fur concomiwit sedation, the
myocanlial wall motion abnormalities, patent furamen potential fur serious complications exists. It is crucial fur
ovale, locali2ed. cardiac wnponade, and right ventricu- the procedure team to know potential complications of
lar dilatation consistent with a pulmonary embofWn.14 TEE so that the risks and benefits of the procedure can
TEE is commonly used in critical care units. Among be discussed and the patient assessed fur any preexisting
308 TEE studies ronducted in an intensive care unit in conditions that may increase the risk of the procedure.
Australia. the most common indications were refractory Figure 2-3 highlights the anatomical locations where
or unexplained bypotension (67%), suspca:cd endocar- reported injuries associated with TEE occur.
ditis (27%), evaluation of ventricular function (15%), In ambulatory, nonoperatlve settings, reported
evaluation of pulmonary cdcma of uncertain etiology rates of major complications ofTEE range from 0.2%
(6%), evaluation of the aorta (4%), and search fur a to 0.5%. In one European multicenter survey of
source of systemic embolU& (4%). Twenty-five percent 10,419 TEE e:wninations, 90 examinatioru (0.88%)
of these c:x:aminations were reqUfStcd. after an inad- had to be interrupted due to patient intolerance of the
equate TTE cwnination. The subsequent TEE exami- probe (65 cases) or because of pulmonary (8 cases),
nation led to changes in therapy in 32% of patients cardiac (8 cases), bleeding complications (2 cases), and
studied and to immediate surgery in 22%, with the 7 other causes. One of the bleeding complications was
greatest yield in postcan:liac surgery patients. 15 Others related to csop~cal infiltration of a lung tumor and
have reported using TEE in ICUs to guide central line proved to be f.u:af (mortality rate 0.0098%). Of note,
placement, evaluate patients with uncxplained hypox--
emia. or evaluate potential heart donors. f6,t7
The proximity of the esophagus to the aorta allows
for precise and accurate diagnosis of certain types
of aortic pathology when using TEE, and this appli-
cation has found a specific niche in the emergency
room (ER). Minard and colleagues compared TEE
with aortography tt> diagnose traumatic disruption of
the aorta, including intimal flaps, pseudoancurysms,
dissections, and ini:raluminal or e:x:tralwninal bema-
tonw, and gross dis&ec:tions with identification of
false and true lumens. However, the sensitivity and l.Myngnl:
·vocal cord trauma
specificity of TEE were lower than those of aortogra- ·airway comprl!!ulon
phy. most likely due to the inability of TEE to inlage • tradleal intubation
the ug~ third of the ascending aorta and the aonic
arch. · 9 Even though some forms of aortic pathology 1E111apln19•I:
- lacer.rtfon
arc not compleu:ly assessed with TEE, this technique ·perforation
is very valuable in ruling out aonic dis.section. Yalcin ·false passage
and coworkers reported TEE to be 98% sensitive and (dlvertkulum)
99% specific fur detection of aonic dissection, and
a 2006 meta-analysis of 10 studies ~ortcd similar
results (98% sensitive, 95% specific). 1 In addition, GMtrlc:
• lflCel'ltfon
of significant importance is the fact that TEE is often ·perforation
safer than other inlaging modalities in hemodynami- ·bleeding
cally unstable patients, as it can be performed at the
bedside. Overall, despite its known deficiencies, TEE
remains the first-line test fur evaluation of the aorta
due to its portability. low cost, low level of invasive-
ness, rapidity, and low complication rate. In the pres-
ence of a negative study, however, it is often necessary FIGURE 2-3. Sites of potential injury.
22 I CHAPTER 2
Tonslllarfauces
m probe lodged In
left plrlform fossa
Demi I glnglval
Esophagus
a majority of the cases in this survey were outpatients pitfalls during insettion is crucial to limit risk of injury
who did not receive intravenous sedation for the TEE (Fig. 2-4). If the probe is not centered during insertion,
procedw:e.24 In the operative setting, manipulation it can become lodged in one of the pyriform sinuses.
of a TEE probe in an inrubated patient under general where further advancement of the probe could lead to
ancsthcsia carries additional risk, but rcponcd rates of injury to dtis area. or can cause severe flexion of the
major complications are similar to nonsurgical patients probe, which could lead co injury during removal The
and range from 0.2% to 1.2%.25 Several fu.ctors may upper esophagus at the 1.cvcl of the aic:opharynx is also
inacase risk, including the inability of the patient to susceptible to injury due to the potential for spasm or
swallow in order to fa.Cilitate probe insertion and the hyperttophy of the aicoplwyngeal muscle and narrow-
patient's inability to alert the operator to uncomfort- ing of the space secondary to cervical spine disease.25
able, possibly injurious probe manipulations. Manipulation of the probe during the study also
The most dreaded complication of TEE is upper carries a small but real risk of injury. One area of the
gutrointestinal (GI) tract perforation, which has a upper GI tract that is particularly vulnerable to injury
reported incidence ofabout 2 per 10,000 paticnts26 and is the gutrocsophageal (GE) junction. When perform-
is associated with scvcrc morbidity and mortility.27 It ing transgutric views, it is important to make sure that
has been reported that 20% of pcrfurations occur dur- the probe tip is past the GI junction into the gastrum.
ing insertion in the hypoph.arynx, and an understand- Significant flexion of the probe at the GE junction can
ing of the anatomy of the hypoplwynx and potential cause mucosa! disruption or Mallory-Weias tears.28 The
THE TEE PROBE I 23
be typically at a 10% to 20% incline, with the legs in a briefly deflating the endotrachca.l tube cuff should be
comfurtable position and the neck slightly flexed. Befure considered, as this may ease passage of the probe tip.32
administering sedation, a mouth guard is placed in the When unusual resistance is encountered during
patient's mouth, as the jaw tends to become rigid and attempts to advance or withdraw the probe, the physi-
difficult to manipulate once the patient is sedated. cian should consider that the tip may have "folded"
Befure inserting the probe, it is important to inspect 180 defrees onto itself, so-called "buckling" of the
it for damage, making sure there are no sharp edges, probe.3 This mechanical problem should be sus-
checking that the controls properly flex and angle the tip, pected when probe movement is difficult, image qual-
and that an image is displayed as the probe tip touches ity is very poor, and the control wheels are bound
ultrasound gel. Prior to insertion, the probe should be and difficult to move. If the physician believes this
straightened, with the control wheels unlocked. The end has occurred, the probe should be advanced gently
of the probe is coated with a thin layer of sterile ultra- into the stomach, the tip straightened, and the probe
sound jelly, which serves to both facilitate insertion of removed and inspected. Under the rare circumstance
the probe and improve contact with the esophagus. To that the TEE probe cannot be moved without exert-
facilitate probe insertion, the index finger of the left ing undue force, a radiograph may help determine
hand should be inserted into the oropharynx (outside the probe position and guide the next intervention.
the mouth guard) and the posterior pharynx palpated In very unusual circumstances, if the deflector mecha-
to ensure there are no deviations from normal anatomy. nism is completely jammed inside the patient and all
The index finger can also be used to push the posterior efforts to release it have failed, the probe should be
aspect of the tongue and epiglottis forward. At the same removed from the unit, and the entire probe shaft
time, the TEE probe is inserted into the oropharynx should be cut with heavy-duty pliers or other suitable
with the left finger helping to keep the probe centercd tool. This will release the deflecting mechanism, allow
and guiding it into the esophagus. Often some resistance the tip to straighten, and facilitate probe removal.
is encountered as the probe passes through the hypo-
pharynx, caused by the cricopharyngeus muscle. If this CARE/STORAGE
occurs, gentle forward pressure should be applied to the
probe while the patient is asked to swallow. For many Proper care, disinfection, and storage of the TEE
patients, this verbal instruction is all that is required- probe is essential for patient safety, as well as to extend
swallowing will close the vocal cords and relax the cri- the life of the probe. Modern TEE probes cost any-
copharyngeus muscle. Flexing the patient's neck or where from $30,000 to $60,000, and a simple careless
slight flexion of the probe tip may also assist its passage mistake such as submerging the multipin connector
past the base of the tongue. Neck flexion also prevents in cleaning solution can cost over $10,000.
stretching of the esophagus, a condition that might
increase the risk of a mucosa! tear or perforation. It may Proper Cleaning Technique
also be helpful to hold the small wheel on the housing
Because TEE is a semi-invasive procedure and the
at a neutral position to avoid undesirable lateral bend-
ing during probe insertion. The large wheel, controlling probes are reusable, there is a real potential for trans-
mission of infection (Table 2-3). Although there are
flexion/extension, should never be locked. If there are
feeding or nasogastric tubes in place, the TEE probe can
usually be placed alongside these devices, but often they Table 2-3. Infectious risks
must be removed to allow adequate imaging. If further
resistance is encountered, the probe should be with- Closs-infection from patient to patient and patient to staff
drawn, centered, and reintroduced into the esophagus. Bacteria-Helicobacter pyfori, Pseudomonas oeruginoso,
It should be kept in mind that unsuspected pathol- Salmonella species, Mycobacterium species
ogy may impede advancement of the probe. Any Viruses-Hepatitis Band C, human immunodeficiency virus
unusual resistance to probe insertion should prompt Prions-Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease
abandonment of the procedure. Failure to place the
probe is rare. Chee et al found a 1.2% rate of failure Contamlnlltion of patients from the decontamlnldlon
among 901 TEE exams. 30 In another review, 98.5% procedure
of failures were due to lack of cooperation or lack of Bacteria-Pseudomonas aeruginosa, J.egionella
operator experience, whereas only 1.5% were due to pneumophila, Mycobacterium species
anatomical abnormalities.2'' Other authors have iden- Reproduced with permission from Kanagala P, Bradley(, Hoffman P,
tified prominent vertebral spurs associated with cer- et al: Guidelines for transoesophageal echocardiographic probe
vical spondylosis as a common cause (16 of 40) of cleaning and disinfection from the British Society of Echocardio-
failure of probe placement.3l In intubated patients, graphy, Eur J Echocardiogr 2011 Oct;l 2(1O):il7-i23.
THE TEE PROBE I 25
no concrete data for infection rates with TEE pro- bedside aa soon as the procedure is over. The probe
cedwe&, it i& piuwned that the infection rates and tip and shaft should be wiped sequentially starting
implicated infectious organisms associated with from the leading end, while being introduced into a
TEE would be comparable to upper GI endoscopy biohazard bag, with a single-use sponge presoaked in
or bronchoscopy (1 in 1.8 million studies).33 Proper a detergent solution to remove gross contamination.
deaning and disinfection of the TEE probe after A similar second wipe should be used to wipe off the
each procedure is thus essential to preventing trans- remaining parts of the probe, including the handle
missible disease from the procedure. Sterilization and controls, cord, and the nonimmersible connec-
of the TEE probe is impractical and not warranted tor.33 The second wipe disinfects contamination from
because the TEE probe does not penetrate sterile the operator's hand.
areas of the body. The probe should then be covered and transferred
Cleaning and disinfection of the probe is a mul- to the designated decontamination room where
tistep pro~ (Fig. 2-5) that starts at the patient's it should be visually inspected for any damage.
A B
C D
FIGURE 2-5. Probe disinfection process. (A} Protective attire. (8) Pre-soak wipe of handle and pin connector.
Note that pin connector has protective cover in place. (C) Dilute detergent in basin per manufacturer's instructions.
(D) Immerse 'TEE probe, but not the connector, in detergent solution for the specified time period (typically 3 to
S minutes). (E) Post-immersion rinse and {F} dry. (G) Automated endoscope reprocessor for further disinfection.
(H) Protective covering applied to probe and stored in clean 'TEE closet
26 I CHAPTER 2
E F
G H
FIGURE 2-5. (Continued)
Decontamination rooms should have demarcated the probe tip and shaft are placed in a diaposable
"dirty" and "clean" areas so that nondecontami- protective sheath.
nated "dirty" probes are not inadvertently confused
with decontaminated "clean" probes. The "dirty" Proper Care and Storage
probe should be immersed in a wash bin utilizing a
detergent made up to the dilution and contact times Guideline documents advise against storing TEE
recommended by the manufacturer. The choice of probes in their delivery cases. This is because a
a detergent solution is guided by its microbicidal. suboptimally deaned probe, if placed in the deliv-
activity and compatibility with the TEE probe mate- ery case, will contaminate the case, which might
rials. Ca.re should be tahn to prevent the pin con- then become the nidus for cross-contamination of
nector from becoming immersed with the probe. subsequent probes. In addition, a failure to fully
After this initial decontamination step, probe dis- suaighten the probe between studies may result in
infection is then pcrfurmed via an automated endo- distortion of the probe shaft. Manufacturers typi-
scope reprocessor (AER). In addition to deaning cally recommend that the probes be stored fully
and disinfection, the Intersodetal Accreditation straight, which can be achieved by hanging them in a
Commission for echocardiography recommends that locked cupboard. There is no time limit to storage of
the structural and electrical integrity of the probe a clean probe with this type of setup. Table 2~4 pres-
be checked between each use, using an ult.rasowtd ents general rules that should be followed to improve
transducer leakage tester.~ Following disinfection, probe longevity.
THE TEE PROBE I 27
— Tiedätkös sinä, pikku veijari, että minä voin viedä sinut joko
Corteen tai Bastiaan. Panen sinut vankeuteen, raudat jaloissa
olkivuoteelle makaamaan, ja mestautan sinut, jos et sano missä
Gianetto
Sanpiero piileksii.
— Hui-hai!
— Jokohan?
— Saat nähdä… Vaan kuuleppa… ole nyt siivo poika, niin minä
annan sinulle jotain.
Poikanen huokasi.
— No, tahdotkos tämän kellon, pikku serkku?
Ajutantille taas tuli aika hätä, kun näki Mateon lähestyvän näin
verkkaisin askelin, pyssy tanassa ja sormi liipasimella.
— Päivää, veli.
— Kavaltajan asunto!
— Pois minusta!
— Serkkuni, ajutantti.
Falcone tempasi kellon ja lennätti sen sellaisella voimalla vasten
kiveä, että se pirstausi tuhanneksi muruksi.
— Lue rukouksesi.
— Isä, osaan minä vielä Ave Marian ja sen, jonka täti minulle
opetti.
— Oletko lopettanut?
— Oikeutta.
Etuvarustuksen valloitus.
Niin pian kuin käsky marssia eteenpäin oli annettu, katsoi kapteeni
minuun niin tutkivasti, että minun täytyi pyyhkäistä pari kertaa nuoria
viiksiäni näyttääkseni niin huolettomalta kuin mahdollista. Muuten ei
minua pelottanutkaan, ja ainoa huoleni oli se, että muut ehkä luulivat
minun pelkäävän. Nuo vaarattomat kuulat vaikuttivat nekin siihen,
että pysyin sankarillisen kylmäverisenä. Itserakkauteni taas toisti,
että todellakin olin vaarassa, koskapa kuitenkin olin patteritulen alla.
Tunsin itseni vallan iloiseksi hyvinvoinnistani ja mietiskelin, kuinka
hauskaa on kertoa Cheverinon varustuksen valloituksesta rouva B:n
salongissa Provencen-kadun varrella.
— Kas sepä oli suora tapa tervehtiä ihmisiä, sanoin niin iloisesti
kuin voin. Oloihin nähden pidettiin tätä huonoa sukkeluutta vallan
mainiona.
Loin katseeni ylöspäin enkä ikinä unohda silloista näkyä. Enin osa
savua oli kohonnut ilmaan ja riippui kuin telttakatos noin
kahdenkymmenen jalan korkealla varustuksen yllä. Sinertävän
usvan läpi näkyivät puoleksi hajonneen rintasuojuksensa takana
venäläiset krenatöörit, jotka seisoivat pyssyt koholla ja
liikkumattomina kuin patsaat. Olen vieläkin näkevinäni jokaisen
sotamiehen, vasen silmä meihin luotuna ja oikea kohotetun pyssyn
peitossa. Eräässä ampumareiässä muutamia askeleita meistä seisoi
mies tulisoihtu kädessä kanuunansa vieressä.
Arpapeli.