Major Performance Task - Mathematics

Chris Hadrian F. Lezama

Seth Deylan A. Secong
Gabriel Keth Rosales

Overview

In this article analysis, my fellow group-mates and I will conduct a thorough research to further
investigate about the proof of Euclid’s SAS theorem with the help of the cross section of a cone.

P. Abbott, after his proof of this side angle side theorem by method of superposition in his book
‘Teach Yourself Geometry’, he mentioned that modern mathematicians had protested against
this method of proof.

The North Carolina State University created the statistical analysis system (SAS) in the 1960s
as a project to examine data from agricultural research. With time, SAS has developed into a
full-featured software package for data management, business intelligence, and advanced
analytics.

The Cross-Sectioning Method of Dokai

The cross-sectioning method developed by Dokai is one of the major contributions to SAS
methodology. With this approach, a population or sample is divided into more manageable,
smaller groups according to specific criteria. This makes it possible for researchers to examine
every group independently, producing more accurate and significant findings.

Benefits -

● Better Accuracy - Dokai's approach enables more accurate data analysis by breaking the
population up into smaller groupings.
● Better Interpretation - By examining subgroups separately, the approach aids
researchers in developing a deeper comprehension of the population.
● Better Decision Making - By using the cross-sectioning method, one can obtain insights
that improve decision-making procedures.

Disadvantages/Possible Downsides -

● Dokai's method can be difficult to implement and requires a thorough understanding of

statistical analysis techniques.
 ● Data Requirements - In order for the approach to work, a significant amount of data may
be needed, which isn't always the case.
● Interpretation Challenges - Determining how to interpret the outcomes of the cross-
sectioning approach requires considerable consideration. Analyzing the results can be
difficult.
● Research Vulnerabilities - Dokai's cross-sectioning approach has several research gaps
and disinformation despite its benefits. One such gap is the absence of uniform
implementation rules, which causes irregularities in the method's use. Furthermore,
additional study is required to confirm the method's efficacy in various sectors and
research domains.

Summary -

To sum it up, Dokai's cross-sectioning approach is an important tool in SAS methodology that
has benefits including better data interpretation and enhanced precision. To fully achieve its
potential in research and decision-making processes, there are obstacles and research gaps
that must be filled.

Recommendation -

To further enhance the utility of Dokai’s cross-sectioning method, researchers are encouraged
to provide a two-column proof detailing the implementation of the method, its advantages, and
limitations. This will help standardize the use of the method and facilitate better understanding
and interpretation of its results.

Two Column Proof -

Statements Reasons
1.) XY = AY Given
2.) Triangle XYZ = AFY SAS Postulate
3.) Apply triangle AFY to triangle The axiom movement
XYZ so that A falls into F and Y
falls into X and line segments YZ
along FY
4.) Construct Line XY From point Every angle has one bisector
x (the coincident point of E and F
of the cross section)to bisect
angle XY and EF
angle XY and EF