Ebook We The People An Introduction To American Government PDF Full Chapter PDF

We the people : an introduction to
American government - eBook PDF

Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebooksecure.com/download/we-the-people-an-introduction-to-american-gover
nment-ebook-pdf/
THOMAS E. PATTERSON
WE
THE
PEOPLE
AN INTRODUCTION TO
AMERICAN GOVERNMENT
T H I R T E E N T H E D I T I O N
Political Science
21st Century Tools, for 21st Century Politics
Connect Government is an application-based assignment platform containing engaging, user-

friendly tools that help students better understand and connect with the concepts and language
used in the American Government course. Political Scientists have reported deeper critical thinking,
improved student performance, and increased classroom efficiency as a result of using Connect
Government, which includes innovative tools that are often auto-gradable, such as:
SmartBook®
Described as a “textbook for the 21st century” by a political scientist,
SmartBook gives students a road map to success through an adaptive
reading experience that changes the way students read. It creates
a personalized, interactive reading environment by highlighting
important concepts, while helping students identify their strengths
and weaknesses. This ensures that he or she is focused on the content
needed to close specific knowledge gaps, while it simultaneously
promotes long-term learning.
NewsFlash
Responding to the need for currency in the American Government
course, this new Connect assignment pairs fresh content on a rolling
basis with auto-grade questions that allow instructors to assess
student understanding of the important news of the day.
Applied Critical Thinking

Nicknamed ACT!, these new activities encourage students to apply
critical thinking skills to core course content through political
research and reflection. First, students assess their understanding
of content, then gather applicable political research, and lastly,
critically reflect on the results.
Practice Government Missions

Practice Government, McGraw-Hill’s educational game focused on
the American political system, can now be played inside of Connect
American Government! Two introductory missions have now been
paired with auto-grade and critical thinking questions that harness
the power of “learning by doing” right within Connect. Additional
missions are available through mhpractice.com.
Concept Clips
Expanded to now include audio, Concept Clips are
engaging videos that walk students through the more
difficult concepts in the American government course
(such as the Electoral College, Supreme Court procedures,
or how to evaluate a public opinion poll).
Interactive Data Analysis

Help your students consume political data in a meaningful
way. Students in the American government course now have
the ability to interact with political data visualizations to
gain insight into important factors that shape our political
process. Students can review electoral turnout over time or
study how demographic shifts in the American population
might affect future elections. These interactive charts
and maps are paired with auto-grade and critical thinking
questions to enhance student understanding.
“I can honestly say that the first time
87% 75% I used SmartBook after reading a

chapter I understood what I had just
read better than I ever had
in the past.”
of college – Nathan Herrmann, Oklahoma State University
students report of students using adaptive
that access to technology report that it
learning analytics is “very helpful” or
can positively “extremely helpful” in
impact their aiding their ability to “I really enjoy how it has gotten me
learning experience. retain new concepts. engaged in the course and it is a great
study tool without having to carry
around a heavy textbook.”
Professors spend: – Madeline Uretsky, Simmons College
Less time on
administrative
tasks 90% “Connect keeps my students engaged
More time and motivated. Requiring Connect
assignments has improved student
75% on active
learning exam grades.”
– Sophia Garcia, Tarrant County College
To learn more about American government, visit the

McGraw-Hill Education American Government page:
bit.ly/MHEAmGov
We the P eople
A N I NTRODUCTION TO A MERICAN G OVERNMENT
THIRTEENTH EDITION
THOMAS E. PATTERSON
Bradlee Professor of Government and the Press
John F. Kennedy School of Government
Harvard University
WE THE PEOPLE: AN INTRODUCTION TO AMERICAN GOVERNMENT,
THIRTEENTH EDITION
Published by McGraw-Hill Education, 2 Penn Plaza, New York, NY 10121. Copyright © 2019 by
McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Previous
editions © 2017, 2015, and 2013. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in
any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written
consent of McGraw-Hill Education, including, but not limited to, in any network or other
electronic storage or transmission, or broadcast for distance learning.
Some ancillaries, including electronic and print components, may not be available to customers
outside the United States.
This book is printed on acid-free paper.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LCR 22 21 20 19
ISBN 978-1-259-91240-5 (bound edition)
MHID 1-259-91240-X (bound edition)
ISBN 978-1-260-16575-3 (loose-leaf edition)
MHID 1-260-16575-2 (loose-leaf edition)
Portofolio Manager: Jason Seitz
Product Development Manager: Dawn Groundwater
Senior Product Developer: Sarah Colwell
Marketing Manager: Will Walter
Content Project Managers: Rick Hecker, George Theofanopoulos
Buyer: Laura Fuller
Design: Egzon Shaqir
Content Licensing Specialist: Ann Marie Jannette
Cover Image: ©Steve Heap/Shutterstock
Compositor: Aptara®, Inc.
All credits appearing on page or at the end of the book are considered to be an extension of the
copyright page.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Patterson, Thomas E.

Title: We the people / Thomas E. Patterson, Bradlee Professor of Government
and the Press, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
Description: Thirteenth edition. | New York, NY : McGraw-Hill Education, [2019]
Identifiers: LCCN 2018041814 | ISBN 9781259912405 (alk. paper) | ISBN
125991240X (alk. paper)
Subjects: LCSH: United States—Politics and government.
Classification: LCC JK276 .P38 2019 | DDC 320.473—dc23 LC record available at
https://lccn.loc.gov/2018041814
The Internet addresses listed in the text were accurate at the time of publication. The inclusion
of a website does not indicate an endorsement by the authors or McGraw-Hill Education, and
McGraw-Hill Education does not guarantee the accuracy of the information presented at
these sites.
mheducation.com/highered
To My Son and Daughter.
Alex and Leigh
About the Author
Thomas E. Patterson is Bradlee Professor of Govern-

ment and the Press in the John F. Kennedy School
of Government at Harvard University. He was previ-
ously Distinguished Professor of Political Science in
the Maxwell School of Citizenship at Syracuse Uni-
versity. Raised in a small Minnesota town near the
Iowa and South Dakota borders, he attended South
Dakota State University as an undergraduate and
served in the U.S. Army Special Forces in Vietnam
before enrolling at the University of Minnesota, where
Courtesy of Thomas Patterson
he received his PhD in 1971.
Since then, he has regularly taught introductory American government. In
2013 he was chosen as teacher of the year and adviser of the year by Harvard
University’s Kennedy School of Government students, the first time a member
of its faculty has received both awards simultaneously.
He has authored numerous books and articles, which focus mainly on elec-
tions, the media, and citizenship. His most recent book, Informing the News,
which was described as “superb” and “mesmerizing” in one review, examines
the public misinformation resulting from the emergence of partisan outlets and
the decline in citizens’ attention to news. An earlier book, The Vanishing Voter
(2002), describes and explains the long-term decline in voter participation. His
book Out of Order (1994) received national attention when President Clinton
urged every politician and journalist to read it. In 2002 Out of Order received
the American Political Science Association’s Graber Award for the best book
of the past decade in political communication. Another of Patterson’s books,
The Mass Media Election (1980), received a Choice award as Outstanding
Academic Title, 1980–1981. Patterson’s first book, The Unseeing Eye (1976),
was selected by the American Association for Public Opinion Research as one
of the 50 most influential books of the past half century in the field of public
opinion.
His research has been funded by major grants from the National Science
Foundation, the Markle Foundation, the Smith-Richardson Foundation, the
Ford Foundation, the Knight Foundation, The Carnegie Corporation, and the
Pew Charitable Trusts.
vi
Contents
A Letter from the Author xix

Preface xxi
Acknowledgments xxxi
Chapter One
Critical Thinking and Political Culture:
Becoming a R esponsible Citizen 1
Learning to Think Critically 3

Obstacles to Critical Thinking 4
What Political Science Can Contribute to Critical Thinking 6
Political Culture: Americans’ Enduring Beliefs 7

Core Values: Liberty, Individualism, Equality,
and Self-Government 9
The Limits and Power of Americans’ Ideals 11
Politics and Power in America 16

A Democratic System 18
A Constitutional System 21
A Free-Market System 21
Who Governs? 23
The Text’s Organization 23

Summary 24
Critical Thinking Zone 25
Chapter Two
Constitutional Democracy:
Promoting Liberty and Self-Government 27
Before the Constitution:

the Colonial and Revolutionary Experiences 30
The Declaration of Independence 31
vii
viii Contents
The Articles of Confederation 32

A Nation Dissolving 33
Negotiating Toward a Constitution 34

The Great Compromise: A Two-Chamber Congress 34
The Three-Fifths Compromise: Issues of Slavery and Trade 35
A Strategy for Ratification 36
The Ratification Debate 39
The Framers’ Goals 40
Protecting Liberty: Limited Government 42

Grants and Denials of Power 43
Using Power to Offset Power 44
Separated Institutions Sharing Power: Checks and Balances 45
The Bill of Rights 48
Judicial Review 49
Providing for Representative Government 52

Democracy versus Republic 52
Limited Popular Rule 53
Altering the Constitution: More Power to the People 54
Constitutional Democracy Today 59

Summary 60
Chapter Three
Federalism: Forging a Nation 63
Federalism: National and State Sovereignty 65

The Argument for Federalism 68
The Powers of the Nation and the States 71
Federalism in Historical Perspective 74

An Indestructible Union (1789–1865) 74
Dual Federalism and Laissez-Faire
Capitalism (1865–1937) 78
Contemporary Federalism (Since 1937) 83

Interdependency and Intergovernmental Relations 83
Government Revenues and Intergovernmental Relations 84
Devolution 87
Contents ix
The Public’s Influence: Setting the Boundaries

of Federal–State Power 92
Summary 93
Chapter Four
Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual R ights 96
The Bill of Rights, the Fourteenth Amendment,

and Selective Incorporation 98
Freedom of Expression 101

Free Speech 102
Free Assembly 107
Press Freedom and Libel Law 107
Freedom of Religion 108

The Establishment Clause 108
The Free-Exercise Clause 110
The Right to Bear Arms 112
The Right of Privacy 113

Abortion 113
Consensual Sexual Relations among Same-Sex Adults 115
Rights of Persons Accused of Crimes 116

Suspicion Phase: Unreasonable Search and Seizure 116
Arrest Phase: Protection against Self-Incrimination 120
Trial Phase: The Right to a Fair Trial 120
Sentencing Phase: Cruel and Unusual Punishment 123
Appeal: One Chance, Usually 125
Crime, Punishment, and Police Practices 125
Rights and the War on Terrorism 126

Detention of Enemy Combatants 127
Surveillance of Suspected Terrorists 127
The Courts and A Free Society 129

Summary 129
x Contents
Chapter Five
Equal R ights: Struggling toward Fairness 132
Equality Through Law 134

The Fourteenth Amendment: Equal Protection 134
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 139
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 141
The Civil Rights Act of 1968 143
Affirmative Action 144
The Struggle for Equality 146

Black Americans 147
Women 149
Hispanic Americans 151
Native Americans 154
Asian Americans 157
Other Disadvantaged Groups 159
Discrimination: Superficial Differences, Deep Divisions 161

Summary 161
Chapter Six
Public Opinion and Political Socialization:
Shaping the People’s Voice 164
The Measurement of Public Opinion 166

Public Opinion Polls 167
Opinion Dimensions 169
Problems with Polls 171
Political Socialization: The Origins of Americans’ Opinions 173

Primary Socializing Agents: Family, School, and Church 174
Secondary Socializing Agents: Peers, Media, Leaders, and Events 175
Frames of Reference: How Americans Think Politically 178

Party Identification 178
Political Ideology 181
Group Orientations 182
Contents xi
The Influence of Public Opinion on Policy 187

Limits on the Public’s Influence 188
Public Opinion and the Boundaries of Action 190
Summary 192
Chapter Seven
Political Participation: Activating the Popular Will 195
Voter Participation 197

Factors in Voter Turnout: The United States
in Comparative Perspective 199
Why Some Americans Vote and Others Do Not 204
Conventional Forms of Participation Other Than Voting 208

Campaign and Lobbying Activities 208
Virtual Participation 209
Community Activities 210
Unconventional Activism: Political Movements and Protests 212

Recent Protest Movements and Their Success 212
The Public’s Response to Protest Activity 216
Participation and the Potential for Influence 217

Summary 218
Chapter Eight
Political Parties, Candidates, and Campaigns:
Defining the Voter’s Choice 220
Party Competition and Majority Rule 222

The First Parties 222
Andrew Jackson and Grassroots Parties 223
Republicans versus Democrats: Realignments and the
Enduring Party System 225
The Nature and Origins of Today’s Party Alignment 228
Parties and the Vote 231
xii Contents
Electoral and Party Systems 231

The Plurality (Single-Member-District) System of Election 231
Politics and Coalitions in the Two-Party System 234
Minor (Third) Parties 237
Parties and Candidates in the Campaign 239

Primary Elections and Candidate Control 240
The Parties’ Role in Campaigns 242
Media Changes and Candidate Control 244
Parties, Candidates, and the Public’s Influence 250

Summary 252
Chapter Nine
Interest Groups: Organizing for Influence 255
The Interest-Group System 258

Economic Groups 259
Citizens’ Groups 262
The Organizational Edge: Economic Groups
versus Citizens’ Groups 265
Inside Lobbying: Seeking Influence Through

Official Contacts 268
Acquiring Access to Officials 269
Webs of Influence: Groups in the Policy Process 273
Outside Lobbying: Seeking Influence Through

Public Pressure 275
Constituency Advocacy: Grassroots Lobbying 275
Electoral Action: Votes and Money 276
The Group System: Indispensable but Biased in

Favor of Economic Groups 278
The Contribution of Groups to Self-Government: Pluralism 278
Flaws in Pluralism: Interest-Group Liberalism and Economic Bias 280
A Madisonian Dilemma 282
Summary 284
Contents xiii
Chapter Ten
The News Media and the Internet:
Communicating Politics 287
Media Change: From the Nation’s Founding to Today 289

Rise of the Partisan Press 289
Rise of Objective Journalism 291
Rise of Cable TV and Partisan Talk Shows 293
Rise of the Internet 295
The Media: Content and Functions 297

Information-Centered Communication 297
Partisan-Centered Communication 302
Entertainment-Centered Communication 303
Media Audiences and Effects 307

The Traditional Audience 308
The Partisan Audience 310
The Inattentive Audience 312
Summary 315
Chapter Eleven
Congress: Balancing National Goals and
Local Interests 318
Congress as a Career: Election to Congress 320

Using Incumbency to Stay in Congress 320
Pitfalls of Incumbency 326
Who Are the Winners in Congressional Elections? 328
Parties and Party Leadership 329

Party Unity in Congress 330
Party Leadership in Congress 330
Party Leaders and Their Members 336
Committees and Committee Leadership 336

Committee Jurisdiction 338
Committee Membership 339
Committee Chairs 340
Committee or Party: Which Is in Control? 340
xiv Contents
How a Bill Becomes Law 341

Committee Hearings and Decisions 341
From Committee to the Floor 343
Leadership and Floor Action 344
Conference Committees and the President 345
Congress’s Policymaking Role 345

The Lawmaking Function of Congress 346
The Representation Function of Congress 349
The Oversight Function of Congress 353
Congress: An Institution Divided 355

Summary 356
Chapter Twelve
The Presidency: Leading the Nation 360
Foundations of the Modern Presidency 363

The Changing Conception of the Presidency 365
The Need for a Strong Presidency 367
Choosing the President 368

The Nominating Campaign: Primaries and Caucuses 370
The National Party Conventions 372
The General Election Campaign 372
Staffing the Presidency 377

The Vice President 377
The Executive Office of the President (EOP) 378
The Cabinet and Agency Appointees 378
The Problem of Control 379
Factors in Presidential Leadership 380

The Force of Circumstance 382
The Stage of the President’s Term 382
The Nature of the Issue: Foreign or Domestic 383
Relations with Congress 386
Public Support 391
The Illusion of Presidential Government 395

Summary 395
Contents xv
Chapter Thirteen
The Federal Bureaucracy: A dministering
the Government 398
Origin and Structure of the Federal Bureaucracy 401

Types of Federal Agencies 402
Federal Employment 406
The Budgetary Process 408

The President and Agency Budgets 408
Congress and the Agency Budgets 410
Policy and Power in the Bureaucracy 411

The Agency Point of View 413
Sources of Bureaucratic Power 415
Democracy and Bureaucratic Accountability 419

Accountability through the Presidency 420
Accountability through Congress 423
Accountability through the Courts 424
Accountability within the Bureaucracy Itself 425
Summary 428
Chapter Fourteen
The Federal Judicial System: A pplying the Law 431
The Federal Judicial System 432

The Supreme Court of the United States 434
Selecting and Deciding Cases 434
Issuing Decisions and Opinions 435
Other Federal Courts 436
The State Courts 438
Federal Court Appointees 441

Supreme Court Nominees 441
Lower-Court Nominees 443
Personal Backgrounds of Judicial Appointees 444
The Nature of Judicial Decision Making 446

Legal Influences on Judicial Decisions 446
Political Influences on Judicial Decisions 449
xvi Contents
Judicial Power and Democratic Government 454

Judicial Restraint versus Judicial Activism 456
What Is the Judiciary’s Proper Role? 458
Summary 460
Chapter Fifteen
Economic and Environmental Policy:
Contributing to Prosperity 463
Government as Regulator of the Economy 465

Efficiency through Government Intervention 466
Equity through Government Intervention 470
The Politics of Regulatory Policy 471
Government as Protector of the Environment 472

Environmental Protection 473
Climate Change and Energy Policy 473
Government as Promoter of Economic Interests 475

Promoting Business 475
Promoting Labor 476
Promoting Agriculture 478
Fiscal Policy as an Economic Tool 478

Demand-Side Policy 478
Supply-Side Policy 479
Fiscal Policy: Practical and Political Limits 481
Monetary Policy as an Economic Tool 484

The Fed 485
The Fed and Control of Inflation 486
The Politics of the Fed 487
Summary 489
Contents xvii
Chapter Sixteen
Income, Welfare, and Education Policy:
Providing for Personal Security 492
Income Politics and Policies 493

The Shifting Income Distribution 494
Parallel Changes 497
The Partisan Divide 500
Welfare Politics and Policies 501

Public Assistance Programs 503
Social Insurance Programs 508
The Politics of Welfare Policy 509
Education Politics and Policies 512

Public Education: Leveling through the Schools 513
The Federal Government’s Role in Education Policy 515
The American Way of Promoting

Economic Security 518
Summary 519
Chapter Seventeen
Foreign Policy: Protecting the A merican Way 522
The Pattern of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy 524

The Cold War and Its Lessons 525
Multilateralism and Its Lessons 526
War on Terrorism 528
Russia and China 531
The Military Dimension of National Security Policy 533

Military Power, Uses, and Capabilities 533
The Politics of National Defense 538
xviii Contents
The Economic Dimension of National Security Policy 539

Foreign Trade 540
Assisting Developing Nations 545
Protecting International Commerce 545
Summary 547
Appendixes 551
Glossary 569
Notes 583
Index 610
A Letter from
the Author
Anyone who writes an introductory program on American government faces

the challenge of explaining a wide range of subjects. One way is to pile fact
upon fact and list upon list. It’s a common approach to textbook writing, but
it turns politics into a pretty dry subject. Politics doesn’t have to be dry, and
it certainly doesn’t have to be dull. Politics has all the elements of drama plus
the added feature of affecting the everyday lives of real people.
My goal has been to make this text the most readable one available. Rather
than piling fact upon fact, the program relies on narrative. A narrative program
weaves together theory, information, and examples in order to bring out key
facts and ideas. The response to this approach has been gratifying. As a previ-
ous edition was being prepared, I received the following note from a longtime
instructor:
I read this book in about three days, cover to cover. . . . I have never seen
a better basic government/politics textbook. I think reading standard
textbooks is “boring” (to use a favorite student word), but this one over-
comes that. Dr. Patterson has managed to do something that I heretofore
thought could not be done.
When writing, I regularly reminded myself that the readers were citizens as
well as students. For this reason, the text encourages “critical thinking,” by
which I mean the process through which an individual determines what can
reasonably be believed and then applies reason and information to reach a
thoughtful conclusion. Each chapter has five boxes that ask you to “think
critically.” Two of these—the “How the U.S. Differs” box and the “How the
50 States Differ” box—ask you to think critically about differences in governing
systems. A third box—“Party Polarization”—asks you to critically analyze dif-
ferences in the Republican and Democratic Parties. A fourth box—“Case
Study”—discusses a political event and then asks you to analyze the outcome.
The final box—“Fake or Fact?”—asks you to critically assess a factual claim.
These boxes are rooted in the idea that critical thinking is a skill that can be
nurtured and, once acquired, can help you become a more responsible citizen,
whether in casting a vote, forming an opinion about a public policy, or con-
tributing to a political cause.
xix
xx A Letter from the Author
Improving your ability to think critically is a primary goal of this text. If

the only result of reading the text was to increase your factual knowledge of
American government, I would judge it a failure. As Albert Einstein once
noted, “The value of a college education is not the learning of many facts but
the training of the mind to think.” Political science courses, like those in other
social science and humanities disciplines, should help students hone their
critical thinking skills. As I indicated, the five boxes in each chapter are
designed for this purpose. So, too, is the “Critical Thinking Zone” at the end
of each chapter. This feature asks you to make use of the chapter’s information
through the application of the three skills—conceptualizing, synthesizing, and
analyzing—that are the foundation of critical thinking.
Finally, in this program I have attempted to present American government
through the analytical lens of political science but in a way that captures the
vivid world of real-life politics. Only a tiny fraction of students in the introduc-
tory course are enrolled because they intend to pursue an academic career in
political science. Most students take it because they are required to do so or
because they have an interest in politics. I have sought to write a book that
will deepen your political interest if you are the second type of student, and
kindle your interest if you are the first type.
We the People has been in use in college classrooms for more than two
decades. During this time, the program has been adopted at more than 1,000
colleges and universities. I am extremely grateful to all who have used it. I am
particularly indebted to the many instructors and students who have sent me
suggestions on how to strengthen it. As they have done for several editions
now, the University of Northern Colorado’s Steve Mazurana and his students
graciously sent me detailed feedback that broadly informed this edition’s revi-
sions. If you have ideas you would like to share, please contact me at the John
F. Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, or by e-mail:
thomas_patterson@harvard.edu.
Thomas E. Patterson
Preface
Relevancy and Readability to Engage Today’s

Student
Tom Patterson’s We the People is a concise approach to American government,
emphasizing critical thinking through relevant examples that appeal to today’s
students. This extremely readable text provides opportunities to engage with
the political process through tools that help students learn how to think about
politics, utilizing digital resources that connect students with the material in a
highly personalized way.
Better Data, Smarter Revision, Improved Results

Students helped inform the revision strategy:
STEP 1. Over the course of three years, data points showing concepts
that caused students the most difficulty were collected anonymously
from McGraw-Hill Education’s Connect® American Government’s
SmartBook for We the People.
STEP 2. The data from SmartBook was provided to the author in the form of
a heat map, which graphically illustrated “hot spots” in the text that impacted
student learning (see image below).
STEP 3. The author used the heat
map data to refine the content and
reinforce student comprehension in
the new edition. Additional quiz
questions and assignable activities
were created for use in Connect
American Government to further
support student success.
RESULT: Because the heat map gave
the author empirically based feedback
at the paragraph and even sentence
level, he was able to develop the new
edition using precise student data
that pinpointed concepts that caused
students the most difficulty.
xxi
xxii Preface
Heat map data also inform the activities and assessments in Connect
merican Government, McGraw-Hill Education’s assignable and assessable learn-
A
ing platform. Where the heat map data indicates that students struggled with spe-
cific learning objectives or concepts, we created new Connect assets—Concept
Clips, Applied Critical Thinking (ACT), and Newsflash current event activities—
to provide another avenue for students to learn and master the content.
Fueled by LearnSmart, SmartBook is the first and only adaptive reading

experience currently available.
Make It Effective. SmartBook creates a personalized reading experience by
highlighting significant concepts that a student needs to learn at that
moment. This ensures that every minute spent with SmartBook productively
contributes to student learning.
Make It Informed. The reading experience continuously adapts by highlighting
content based on what the student knows and doesn’t know. Real-time reports
quickly identify the concepts that require more attention from individual
students—or the entire class. SmartBook detects the content a student is most
likely to forget and resurfaces it to improve long-term retention.
New to this edition, SmartBook is now optimized for mobile and tablet
and is accessible for students with disabilities. And as part of any American
government course, SmartBook now focuses on the broader context for and
building blocks of the political system. Specifically, it has been enhanced
with improved learning objectives to ensure that students gain foundational
knowledge while also learning to make connections for broader understand-
ing of government institutions, events, and behavior. SmartBook personalizes
learning to individual student needs, continually adapting to pinpoint knowl-
edge gaps and focus learning on topics that need the most attention. Study
time is more productive and, as a result, students are better prepared for
class and coursework. For instructors, SmartBook tracks student progress
and provides insights that can help guide teaching strategies.
Informing and Engaging Students

on Political Concepts
Using Connect American Government, students can learn the course material
more deeply and study more effectively than ever before.
At the remember and understand levels of Bloom’s taxonomy, Concept Clips
help students break down key concepts in American government. Using easy-
to-understand audio narration, visual cues, and colorful animations, Concept
Preface xxiii
Clips provide a step-by-step presentation that aids in student retention. New

Concept Clips for this edition include the following:
• What are the Types of Government?
• Federalists and Antifederalists
• What is Devolution?
• Regulation of the Media
• Who Participates?
• Presidency: Going Public
• U.S. Foreign Policy
In addition to the concept-based clips, the new edition also offers several
skills-based clips that equip students for work within and outside the class-
room. These skills-based clips include the following:
• Evaluating the News
• Critical Thinking
• How to Read a Court Case
• How to Understand Charts and Graphs
• Political Cartoons
• How to Avoid Plagiarism
Also at the remember and understand levels of Bloom’s taxonomy, Newsflash

ties current news stories to key American government concepts and learning
objectives. After evaluating a related news story, students are assessed on their
ability to connect it to the course content. Examples include the 2018 midterm
election results, 2017 tax reform legislation, and trade tariffs.
xxiv Preface
Deepen understanding of how politics happens in the real world by leverag-

ing the most popular podcasts available with our new Podcast Assignments.
These assignments allow you to bring greater context and nuance to your
courses while engaging students through the storytelling power of podcasts.
At the apply, analyze, and evaluate levels of Bloom’s taxonomy, critical

thinking activities allow students to engage with the political process and learn
by doing.
• Quiz: What Is Your Political Ideology?
• Poll: Americans’ Confidence in the Police
• Research: Find Your Senator
• Infographic: Compare the Courts
Practice Government, McGraw-Hill’s educational game focused on the
American political system, is fully integrated inside of Connect American
Government! A set of focused introductory missions are paired with auto-grade
and critical thinking.
Content Changes
In addition to thorough updates of the data and figures throughout the text,
fresh new photographs and other images in every chapter, and a new “Fake
or Fact?” boxed feature (individual boxes listed below) to help students nego-
tiate misinformation in today’s social media–driven and increasingly partisan
media, the revisions to Chapters 6, 10, and 13 were guided by the student heat
map data mentioned earlier.
Preface xxv
Finally, We the People, Thirteenth Edition, includes the following specific

chapter-by-chapter changes:
Chapter 1, Critical Thinking and Political Culture: Becoming a Responsible
Citizen
• New introduction focused on the impact of the current wave of
misinformation on Americans’ beliefs (using the 2016 Edgar Maddison
Welch “pizzagate” shooting and other examples) as an introduction to
the book’s strong emphasis on critical thinking
• Thoroughly revised “Learning to Think Critically” section (previously
“Learning to Think Politically”) emphasizing how the skill of critical
thinking—and the avoidance of confirmation bias—is more important than
ever in light of our current culture of misinformation
• New “Fake or Fact?” box (“Do Immigrants Commit More Crimes?”) in
the “Political Culture: Americans’ Enduring Beliefs” section
Chapter 2, Constitutional Democracy: Promoting Liberty and Self-Government
• New introduction focused on John McCain’s acceptance speech upon receiv-
ing the National Constitution Center’s Liberty Medal as a segue into the
chapter’s focus on the idealism that has shaped America from its beginning
• New “Fake or Fact?” box (“Were Millions of Illegal Votes Cast in Favor
of Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Election?”) in the “Providing for
Representative Government” section
Chapter 3, Federalism: Forging a Nation
• New introduction focused on the conflict between Donald Trump’s
immigrant deportation policy and the establishment of sanctuary cities
as a segue into the chapter’s focus on national versus state power
• New “Case Study” box (“The Power of Government”) in the “Federalism:
National and State Sovereignty” section
• New “Fake or Fact?” box (“Do States Have Final Authority over Marijuana
Laws?”) in the “Federalism: National and State Sovereignty” section
Chapter 4, Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights
• New “Fake or Fact?” box (“Do You Have a Right to Speak Freely on
Campus?”) in the “Freedom of Expression” section
• New discussion of the Supreme Court ruling in the 2018 Masterpiece
Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Division case in the “Freedom of
Expression” section
• New discussion of the Supreme Court ruling in the 2018 Carpenter v.
United States case in the “Rights of Persons Accused of Crimes” section
xxvi Preface
Chapter 5, Equal Rights: Struggling toward Fairness

• Reorganized and streamlined discussion of equal rights throughout the
chapter
• New “Fake or Fact?” box (“Is Justice Color Blind?”) in the “Equality
through Law” section
Chapter 6, Public Opinion and Political Socialization: Shaping the People’s Voice
• New chapter introduction focused on public opinion and the gun control
debate in the wake of the Parkland school shooting
• Fully updated discussions of opinion dimensions (with marijuana
legalization and Trump approval rating examples) and problems with
polls in “The Measurement of Public Opinion” section
• New “Fake or Fact?” box (“Can the Polls Be Trusted?”) in “The
Measurement of Public Opinion” section
• New introduction to the “Political Socialization: The Origins of Ameri-
cans’ Opinions” section, focused on opinion regarding free trade, as well
as updated discussion of national pride (including a fully revised “How
the U.S. Differs” box)
• Updated discussions of religion and economic class group orientations in
the “Frames of Reference: How Americans Think Politically” section
• Updated discussion of partisanship with new examples in “The Influence
of Public Opinion of Policy” section
Chapter 7, Political Participation: Activating the Popular Will
• Updated discussion of midterm participation, voter ID laws, European voter
participation, and the Hispanic vote in the “Voter Participation” section
• New “Fake or Fact?” box (“Are Our Attention Spans Shrinking?”) in the
“Voter Participation” section
• Thoroughly updated discussions of the Black Lives Matter, #MeToo, and
anti–gun violence movements (as well as factors in the success of various
political movements) in the “Unconventional Activism: Political Movements
and Protest” section
Chapter 8, Political Parties, Candidates, and Campaigns: Defining
the Voter’s Choice
• New chapter introduction focused on the results of the 2018 midterm
elections
• Expanded discussion of the history of party partisanship from the 1960s
to today in the “Party Competition and Majority Rule” section
• New “Fake or Fact?” box (“Are Strong Partisans the Most Informed
Citizens?”) in the “Party Competition and Majority Rule” section
Preface xxvii
• Updated coverage of third parties, as well as fully revised discussion of

the decline of moderate voters and the characteristics of Republican and
Democratic voters in the “Electoral and Party Systems” section
• Fully revised and restructured section on “Parties and Candidates in the
Campaign” (formerly “Party Organizations”)
• Expanded discussion of voter accountability in the “Parties, Candidates,
and the Public’s Influence” section
Chapter 9, Interest Groups: Organizing for Influence

• New introduction discussing the unprecedented number of corporate
lobbyists who sought a steep cut in the corporate tax rate during
congressional deliberations on the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
• New discussion of the power of the National Rifle Association as an
example of outside lobbying in the “Outside Lobbying: Seeking Influence
through Public Pressure” section
• New “Fake or Fact?” box (“Do ‘the People’ Decide?”) in “The Group
System: Indispensable but Biased in Favor of Economic Groups” section
Chapter 10, The News Media and the Internet: Communicating Politics
• New chapter title (formerly “The News Media: Communicating Political
Images”) reflecting the ever-increasing importance of the Internet as a
source of political communication
• New chapter introduction focused on the extremely disparate messages
coming from American news sources
• Fully revised (and newly titled) section on “Media Change: From the
Nation’s Founding to Today,” with a new introduction, new organization,
an expanded section on the rise of cable TV and partisan talk shows, and
a new section on the rise of the Internet
• Fully revised (and newly titled) section on “The Media: Content and
Functions,” with a new introduction, new organization, a thoroughly
revised section on information-centered communication, new discussion
of Trump and tweeting, a new “How the U.S. Differs” box (“Russian
Interference in Western Elections”), and a new section on partisan-
centered communication
• New “Fake or Fact?” box (“Are the Traditional News Media Politically
Biased?”) in “The Media: Content and Functions” section
• Fully revised (and newly titled) section on “Media Audiences and
Effects,” with a new introduction, new organization, a new section on
the traditional audience, and thoroughly revised sections on partisan and
inattentive audiences
xxviii Preface
Chapter 11, Congress: Balancing National Goals and Local Interests

• New chapter introduction focused on bipartisan support of the 2018 budget bill
• Revised “Congress as a Career: Election to Congress” section, with
updated and expanded discussions of gerrymandering, personal
misconduct, and challenges to incumbents.
• Revised “Parties and Party Leadership” section, with expanded discussion
of partisanship, new discussion of the Hastert Rule, and a new section on
party leaders and their members
• New discussion of the effects of polarization in the “Committees and
Committee Leadership” section
• Revised “Congress’s Policymaking Role” section, with new discussions of
partisanship in relation to immigration reform, policy deadlock, and the
House Intelligence Committee’s investigation into Russian meddling in
the 2016 presidential election
• New “Fake or Fact?” box (“Are Policy Problems Simple and Easy to
Fix?”) in the “Congress: An Institution Divided” section
Chapter 12, The Presidency: Leading the Nation

• New introduction on the unprecedented nature of the first year of
Trump’s presidency
• Revised “Choosing the President” section, with new discussion of
Democrats expected to run in the 2020 presidential election, the effects
of Gary Johnson and Jill Stein on the 2016 presidential elections, and
the total price tag for the 2016 presidential elections
• New discussion of the firing of Rex Tillerson in the “Staffing the
Presidency” section
• Revised “Factors in Presidential Leadership” section, with new discussion
of Trump’s relationship with Congress during his first two years,
Americans’ approval of Trump’s missile strikes on Syrian installations,
and Trump’s unprecedented media coverage
• New “Fake or Fact?” box (“Do Trump’s Supporters Believe His
Claims?”) in the “Factors in Presidential Leadership” section
Chapter 13, The Federal Bureaucracy: Administering the Government

• New examples within the discussions of regulatory agencies and
presidential commissions, as well as new discussion of the Department of
Homeland Security in the “Origin and Structure of the Federal
Bureaucracy” section
• New examples throughout “The Budgetary Process” section
• Updated discussion of clientele groups in the “Policy and Power in the
Bureaucracy” section
Preface xxix
• New “Fake or Fact?” box (“Is There a ‘Deep State’?”) in the “Policy and
Power in the Bureaucracy” section
• Fully revised “Party Polarization” box (“The Politicization of the
Bureaucracy”) and updated discussions of the EPA and SES in the
“Democracy and Bureaucratic Accountability” section
Chapter 14, The Federal Judicial System: Applying the Law

• Updated coverage of filibustering of Supreme Court nominees, the Neil
Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nominations, and women
and minority appointees to the federal court in the “Federal Court
Appointees” section
• New “Fake or Fact?” box (“Would Democracy Do Better If Presidents Could
Ignore the Courts?”) in “The Nature of Judicial Decision Making” section
Chapter 15, Economic and Environmental Policy: Contributing to Prosperity

• Updated discussion of partisan views on regulation in the “Government
as Regulator of the Economy” section, focusing on the Democrat-
supported 2010 Dodd-Frank Act and the Republican-supported 2018
Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act
• New discussion of Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris accord in the
“Government as Protector of the Environment” section
• New discussion of the 2018 Supreme Court decision on mandatory
union dues in the “Government as Promoter of Economic Interests”
section
• New coverage of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in the “Fiscal Policy
as an Economic Tool” section
• New “Fake or Fact?” box (“Would Eliminating Foreign Aid Balance the
Budget?”) in the “Fiscal Policy as an Economic Tool” section
Chapter 16, Income, Welfare, and Education Policy: Providing for Personal
Security
• New introduction focused on the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
• New discussion of Trump’s withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
and corporate lobbying for the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in the
“Income Politics and Policies” section
• Updated coverage of entitlement programs in the “Welfare Politics and
Policies” section
• New “Fake or Fact?” box (“Do Citizens Who Claim to Know the Most
about Policy Issues Actually Know the Most?”) in the “Education Politics
and Policies” section
xxx Preface
Chapter 17, Foreign Policy: Protecting the American Way

• New introduction focused on Trump’s withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific
Partnership
• Fully revised (and newly titled) “The Pattern of U.S. Foreign and
Defense Policy” section, with reorganized and updated discussions of the
Islamic State, Russia, and China
• New “Fake or Fact?” box (“Did Russia Try to Influence the 2016
Election?”) in “The Pattern of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy” section
• Updated “How the U.S. Differs” box and updated military spending data
in “The Military Dimension of National Security Policy” section
• New discussion of Donald Trump’s “America First” policy, a new “Case
Study” box (“Trade with China”), and updated coverage of American
foreign aid in “The Economic Dimension of National Security Policy”
section
Acknowledgments
Nearly two decades ago, when planning the first edition of We the People, my
editor and I concluded that it would be enormously helpful if a way could be
found to bring into each chapter the judgment of those political scientists who
teach the introductory course year in and year out. Thus, in addition to solic-
iting general reviews from a select number of expert scholars, we sent each
chapter to a dozen or so faculty members at U.S. colleges and universities of
all types—public and private, large and small, two-year and four-year. These
political scientists, 213 in all, had well over 1,000 years of combined experience
in teaching the introductory course, and they provided countless good ideas.
Since then, several hundred other political scientists have reviewed subse-
quent editions. These many reviewers will go unnamed here, but my debt to
all of them remains undiminished by time. For the thirteenth edition, I have
benefited from the thoughtful advice of the many who responded to McGraw-
Hill’s online survey.
I also want to thank those at McGraw-Hill Education and who contributed
to the thirteenth edition: Katie Stevens, Jason Seitz, Dawn Groundwater, Elisa
Odoardi, Rick Hecker, Will Walter, Sarah Colwell, Kelly Heinrichs, and Ann
Marie Jannette, as well as freelance product developer Bruce Cantley and
photo researchers Steve Rouben and Danny Meldung at Photo Affairs, Inc. At
Harvard, I had the ongoing support of Emily Roseman and Eric Singerman.
Thomas E. Patterson
xxxi
CHAPTER
1
Critical Thinking and Political

Culture: Becoming a Responsible
Citizen
©Alan Crosthwaite/Alamy
“ ”
The worth of the state, in the long run, is the worth of the individuals composing it.
John Stuart Mill1
It was a bright Sunday afternoon in the nation’s capital when Edgar Maddison
Welch walked into Comet Ping Pong pizza restaurant and, after telling customers
to flee, searched the restaurant and opened fire. After his arrest, police recovered
a pistol and an assault rifle at the scene and another gun in his pickup truck.
What prompted Welch to shoot up a pizzeria? He didn’t have a grudge
against a former boss or fellow employee. Welch had driven his truck from North
Carolina to “self-investigate” a story he had seen online.2 The fake story claimed
that coded e-mails on Hillary Clinton’s private server revealed the pizza shop was
a front for a child sex-ring in which she and other top Democrats were involved.
The victims were allegedly imprisoned in vaults hidden below the shop. As it
turned out, there was no sex-ring, and the pizza shop didn’t even have a basement.
1
2 Chapter 1: Critical Thinking and Political Culture
As senseless as Edgar Maddison Welch’s act might seem, he was not alone
in his thinking. A poll taken after Welch’s arrest found that a third of Americans
thought the sex-ring allegation was “definitely” or “probably” true.3
In addition to its grim side, misinformation has its comic side. In one poll,
10 percent of respondents thought that Judith Sheindlin (“Judge Judy”) holds
a seat on the Supreme Court.4 But the grim side is alarming. It’s easy today
to find policy issues on which millions of Americans are wildly misinformed.
Never in the history of scientific opinion polls, which date to the 1930s, has
misinformation clouded the minds of so many people.5
Some degree of political misinformation is to be expected. Politics is largely
a second-hand experience—something we hear about from others. We would
understand it better if we experienced it directly. A skier who has just smacked
into a tree has a reality check denied to the citizen who’s convinced that pay-
ments to welfare recipients account for half the federal budget.
Today’s volume of misinformation is unprecedented. A full list of Ameri-
cans’ false beliefs would fill many pages. Here are just a few of the more
prominent ones from recent years, along with the rough percentage of Amer-
icans who believed they were true at the time:
• Crime has gone up in the past decade (70 percent).6

• Donald Trump won the popular vote in the 2016 election (30 percent).7
• The 2010 Affordable Care Act included “death panels” (40 percent).8
• The federal budget deficit could be eliminated by cutting government
waste and fraud (70 percent).9
• China owns more than half of U.S. debt (50 percent).10
• Social Security will go totally broke in my lifetime (50 percent).11
Early opinion polls revealed that Americans didn’t know much about public
affairs.12 An alarming number of citizens couldn’t answer simple questions like
“What is the name of your state’s governor?” Polls since then have found the
same tendency, which has led analysts to question whether citizens are equipped
to play the role that democracy asks of them. Political scientist James David
Barber wrote that the uninformed “are dangerously unready when the time
comes for choice.”13
But whatever risks the uninformed pose, they pale alongside the risks posed
by the misinformed. The uninformed know what they don’t know, whereas the
misinformed think they know something but don’t know that they’re wrong.
It’s the difference between ignorance and irrationality.14 If large numbers of
citizens are misinformed, and make policy and candidate choices on that basis,
politics becomes aimless. Whether in forming an opinion or casting a vote,
Chapter 1: Critical Thinking and Political Culture 3
People respond, not to the world as it is, but to the world as they think it is. That’s as true today as
during the time when people thought the world was flat and wouldn’t sail out to sea because they
feared sailing off the edge. Many of today’s citizens hold opinions that are wildly at odds with reality.
(Source: Swedish National Library)
citizens need to know what’s at issue, so that they can make a reasoned judg-
ment. When they lose touch with reality, such judgments are impossible.15 The
problem with misinformed voters is not their logic. Their decisions make per-
fect sense given what they believe. The problem is that they’re living in an
alternative world.
Learning to Think Critically

This book aims to help students, as citizens, learn to think critically about
politics. Critical thinking is not the mere act of having an opinion. Critical
thinking is defined instead by the process through which conclusions are
reached. Critical thinking involves determining what can reasonably be believed
and then using the information to reach a thoughtful conclusion. It enables
citizens to act responsibly, whether in casting a vote, forming an opinion on
a political issue, or contributing to a political cause. It involves the careful
evaluation of information in the process of forming a judgment about the issue
at hand. Opinions not reached in this way are likely to be incomplete at best,
perhaps even wildly off base.16
Critical thinking requires a willingness to listen to alternative points of view
and a desire to know the facts. Critical thinking takes effort. Citizens who
make that effort will often reach different conclusions about what policies or
leaders are best for the country. Critical thinking involves judging information
in the context of one’s values and interests, which differ from one citizen to
the next and can lead reasonable people to make different choices. But sound
judgment is blunted when the citizen is mired in misinformation or hears only

what one side has to say. The true test of an opinion is not whether it seems
solid but whether it holds up when judged against other views. “He who knows
only his one side of the case knows little of that,” philosopher John Stuart
Mill wrote. “His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to
refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons of the opposite
side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for
preferring either opinion.”17
Democracy liberates the individual. Authoritarian governments suppress
individuality, forcing people to think and act in prescribed ways or risk punish-
ment. Democracy frees the mind, but the individual citizen determines how
that freedom will be used. Citizens can develop the habit of critical thinking,
or they can invent cockeyed visions of reality. There is nothing to stop them
from thinking the world is flat rather than round, but in such cases they can
only blame themselves for how their choices turn out. They will make choices—
forming an opinion on this issue or that one, voting for this candidate or that
one—but the result will not be what they expect. Consider that many Americans
supported the 2003 invasion of Iraq because they thought the war would end
in weeks, given that the Iraqi army was no match for the U.S. military. A
decade later the war was still going on as a result of the ethnic and religious
strife that was unleashed by the U.S. invasion. If a decade-long war might have
been difficult to predict, the thought that the war would end in weeks was
wishful thinking, not critical thinking.
Obstacles to Critical Thinking

The obstacles to critical thinking have increased in recent decades. Our media
system has changed markedly, as first cable and then the Internet expanded
our sources of information. Many of the newer sources are not to be trusted.
Some talk-show hosts, bloggers, and website creators care little about the accu-
racy of the claims they make. They routinely slant or invent information to
suit their purpose while hiding contradictory information. During the 2016
presidential campaign, for example, a fake story headlined “Pope Francis
Shocks World, Endorses Donald Trump for President, Releases Statement”
was widely circulated on the Internet. A poll found that three-fourths of Donald
Trump’s supporters and half of Hillary Clinton’s supporters who had seen the
story believed it,18 although a moment’s reflection should have told them
otherwise.19 Popes do not endorse political candidates, whether they’re running
for office in the United States or elsewhere.
Political leaders have also contributed to the rise in misinformation. Decep-
tion has always been part of our politics. During the Vietnam conflict, the
Johnson and Nixon administrations told Americans that the conflict was going
well when in fact it was going poorly. Nevertheless, the public at an earlier time
was less tolerant of deceptive claims, and leaders were less inclined to make them.
In recent years, as our politics has become more heated and divisive, we’ve
become more tolerant of leaders who slant the facts, and they’ve become more
willing to do it.20 For instance, during the 2016 presidential campaign, Donald
Trump and Bernie Sanders claimed that free trade agreements were the major
killer of factory jobs. Foreign trade has indeed cost America factory jobs, but
it’s not anywhere near the biggest job killer. It accounts for only one in eight
lost factory jobs. Automation is the real killer. Since the 1950s, manufacturing
has shed two-thirds of its jobs, but its productive output has increased sixfold
because of automation.21And that problem will only worsen as advances in
artificial intelligence enable machines to take over more and more jobs.
We’re also behind the rise in misinformation. Confirmation bias refers to
our tendency to interpret information in ways that reinforce what we already
believe.22 Given the same information, Republicans and Democrats will often
construe it in ways that fit their partisan bias, which can lead them to false
conclusions. For example, as the rumor spread that Democrat Hillary Clinton
was part of a child sex-ring run out of a pizza shop (see the beginning of this
chapter), Republicans were far more likely than Democrats to think it was true.23
After 9/11, when it was rumored that Republican president George W. Bush
Critical thinking is what enables citizens to act responsibly and effectively when forming opinions
and choosing candidates. The challenges to critical thinking have increased in recent years with
the rise of misinformation. Many of the political messages that today’s citizens see and hear are
factually wrong. (©master_art/Shutterstock)
personally knew in advance of the terrorist attack and let it happen to further
his geopolitical ambitions, Democrats were far more likely than Republicans
to believe the false claim.24
Many citizens choose to immerse themselves in “echo chambers,” where
what they hear is what they want to hear. Conservative talk-show programs,
for example, have an audience made up largely of conservatives, while liberal
programs have a heavily liberal audience. On many of these programs, listeners
are fed a distorted version of truth. “A sociopathic alternative reality” is one
observer’s description.25 People who wouldn’t consider asking their plumber
to diagnose a persistent cough accept without thinking what a favorite talk-
show host tells them about the intricacies of foreign policy. People who spend
hours listening to partisan talk shows have the distinction of being among
America’s most misinformed citizens.26
What Political Science Can Contribute

to Critical Thinking
This text will not try to tell you what to think politically. There is no correct
way of thinking when it comes to the “what” of politics. People differ in their
political values and interests and, thus, also differ in their political opinions.
Instead, this text will help you learn how to think critically by providing you
with analytical tools that can sharpen your understanding of American politics.
The tools are derived from political science—the systematic study of govern-
ment and politics. Political science has developed largely through the work of
scholars, but political practitioners and writers have also contributed. One of
America’s foremost political scientists was the chief architect of the U.S.
Constitution and later a president. Even today, James Madison’s essays on
constitutional design (two of which can be found in this book’s appendixes)
are masterpieces of political science.
As a discipline, political science is descriptive and analytical—that is, it attempts
to depict and explain politics. This effort takes place through various frameworks,
including rational choice theory, institutional analysis, historical reasoning,
behavioral studies, legal reasoning, and cultural analysis. Political science offers
a set of analytical tools that can increase one’s ability to think critically:
• Reliable information about how the U.S. political system operates

• Systematic generalizations about major tendencies in American politics
• Terms and concepts that precisely describe key aspects of politics
These tools will broaden your understanding of American politics and help
you think critically about it.
Like any skill, critical thinking needs to be developed through practice.

For this reason, each of the text’s chapters includes boxes that ask you to
think critically. Some boxes deal with perennial questions, such as about the
president’s war powers and the proper relation between the nation and the
states. Other boxes ask you to think critically by comparing how politics in
the United States and in your state differs from that of other nations and
states. Still other boxes present cases of actual events and ask you to think
critically by analyzing these developments. Other boxes provide information
and ask you to assess whether the claim is fake or fact. Finally, some boxes
deal with current controversies, including the rising level of party polariza-
tion in America.
Political Culture: Americans’

Enduring Beliefs
An understanding of U.S. politics properly begins with an assessment of the
nation’s political culture. Every country has its political culture—the widely
shared and deep-seated beliefs of its people about politics.27 These beliefs
derive from the country’s traditions and help define the relationship of citizens
to their government and to each other.
Although every country has a distinctive political culture, the United States,
as the British writer James Bryce observed, is a special case.28 Americans’
beliefs are the foundation of their national identity. Other people take their
identity from the common ancestry that led them gradually to gather under
one flag. Thus, long before there was a France, Germany, or Japan, there were
French, German, and Japanese people, each a kinship group united through
ancestry. Not so for Americans. They are a multitude of people from different
lands—England, Germany, Ireland, Africa, Italy, Poland, Mexico, and China,
to name just a few (see “How the U.S. Differs”). Americans are linked not by
a shared ancestry but by allegiance to a common set of ideals. The French
writer Alexis de Tocqueville was among the first to recognize how thoroughly
certain beliefs were embedded in the American mind. “Habits of the heart”
was how he described them.
America’s core ideals are rooted in the European heritage of the first white
settlers. They arrived during the Enlightenment period, when people were
awakening to the idea of individual potential, which could be pursued with
less difficulty in the more equal society of the New World than in the more
stratified society—of nobles and commoners—of the Old World. Ultimately, the
colonists overturned the European way of governing. The American Revolution
was the first successful large-scale rebellion in human history driven largely by
HOW THE U.S. DIFFERS

CRITICAL THINKING THROUGH COMPARISONS
A Nation of Immigrants
The United States has been called a “nation of immigrants.” Americans
can trace their ancestral roots to nearly every country on earth. Even today,
one in every seven Americans is an immigrant. If the children of immi-
grants are included, the figure is one in every four Americans.
Migrants make up a larger percentage of the population in the United
States than they do in nearly every other country. Here are selected com-
parisons, based on the percentage of the population of high school age
who are immigrants or the children of immigrants.
Percentage who are immigrants or children of immigrants
United States 26%
Germany 23%
France 16%
Great Britain 16%
Italy 10%
Japan 1%
Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2016.
Q: How might more recent U.S. immigrants differ from those who came
to the United States earlier in its history?
A: The great majority of early immigrants to America came from Europe,

which was due in part to restrictions on immigrants from other parts of
the globe. Legislation was enacted in 1965 that eased restrictions on immi-
gration from Latin America and Asia. Since then, most immigrants have
come from those regions.
the desire to create a radically different form of society.29 In the words of the
Declaration of Independence:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they
are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these
are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That, to secure these rights, govern-
ments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of
the governed; that, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these
ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new
government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in
such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.
A decade later, in the drafting of the Constitution of the United States,
some of these ideas were put into writing: Leaders would be required to govern
within a set of rules designed to protect people’s rights and interests.
Core Values: Liberty, Individualism, Equality,

and Self-Government
An understanding of America’s cultural ideals begins with recognition that the
individual is paramount. Government is secondary. Its role is to serve the
people, as opposed to a system where people are required to serve government.
No clearer statement of this principle exists than the Declaration of Indepen-
dence’s reference to “unalienable rights”—freedoms that belong to each and
every citizen and that cannot lawfully be taken away by government.
Liberty, individualism, equality, and self-government are widely regarded as
America’s core political ideals. Liberty is the principle that individuals should
be free to act and think as they choose, provided they do not infringe unrea-
sonably on the freedom and well-being of others.30 Political liberty was nearly
a birthright for early Americans. They did not have to accept the European
system of absolute government when greater personal liberty was as close as
the next area of unsettled land. Religious sentiments also entered into the
thinking of the early Americans. Many of them had fled Europe to escape
religious persecution and came to look upon religious freedom as part of a
broader set of rights, including freedom of speech. Unsurprisingly, these early
Americans were determined, when forming their own government, to protect
their liberty. The Declaration of Independence rings with the proclamation
that people are entitled to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” The
preamble to the Constitution declares that the U.S. government was founded
to secure “the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.”
Early Americans also enjoyed unprecedented economic opportunities.
Unlike Europe, America had no hereditary nobility that owned virtually all the
land. The New World’s great distance from Europe and its vast stretches of open
Americans’ cultural beliefs have their roots in the nation’s formative years. The challenges and
opportunities of North America’s vast wilderness helped foster in settlers a commitment to liberty,
equality, self-reliance, and self-determination. This 19th-century portrayal of frontier life is a hand-
painted Currier & Ives lithograph created by Frances Flora Bond Palmer. She was one of the era’s
leading lithographic artists. (Source: Yale University Art Gallery)
territory gave ordinary people the chance to own property, provided they were
willing to work hard enough to make it a success. Out of this experience grew
a sense of self-reliance and a culture of “rugged individualism.” Individualism
is a commitment to personal initiative and self-sufficiency. Observers from
Tocqueville onward have seen fit to note that liberty in America, as in no other
country, is tied to a desire for economic independence. Americans’ chief aim,
wrote Tocqueville, “is to remain their own masters.”31
A third American political ideal is equality—the notion that all individuals
are equal in their moral worth and thereby entitled to equal treatment under
the law. Europe’s rigid system of aristocratic privilege was unenforceable in
frontier America. It was this natural sense of personal equality that Thomas
Jefferson expressed so forcefully in the Declaration of Independence: “We hold
these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.” However, equal-
ity has always been America’s most elusive ideal. Even Jefferson professed not
to know its exact meaning. A slave owner, Jefferson distinguished between free
citizens, who were entitled to equal rights, and slaves, who were not. After
slavery was abolished, Americans continued to argue over the meaning of

equality, and the debate continues today. Does equality require that wealth and
opportunity be widely shared? Or does it merely require that artificial barriers
to advancement be removed? Despite differing opinions about such questions,
an insistence on equality is a distinctive feature of the American experience.
Americans, said Bryce, reject “the very notion” that some people might be
“better” than others merely because of birth or position.32
America’s fourth great political ideal is self-government—the principle that
the people are the ultimate source of governing authority and should have a
voice in their governing. Americans’ belief in self-government formed in colo-
nial America. The Old World was an ocean away, and European governments
had no option but to give the American colonies a degree of self-determination.
Out of this experience came the vision of a self-governing nation that led tens
of thousands of ordinary farmers, merchants, and tradesmen to risk their lives
fighting the British during the American Revolution. “Governments,” the
Declaration of Independence proclaims, “deriv[e] their just powers from the
consent of the governed.” The Constitution of the United States opens with
the words “We the People.” Etched in a corridor of the Capitol in Washington,
D.C., are the words Alexander Hamilton spoke when asked about the founda-
tion of the nation’s government: “Here, sir, the people govern.”
The Limits and Power of Americans’ Ideals

America’s cultural beliefs are idealistic. They hold out the promise of a govern-
ment of high purpose, in which power is widely shared and used for the common
good, and where individuals are free, independent, and equal under the law.
Yet high ideals do not come with a guarantee that people will live up to
them. The clearest proof in the American case is the human tragedy that began
nearly four centuries ago and continues today. In 1619 the first black slaves
were brought in chains to America. Slavery lasted 250 years. Slaves worked in
the fields from dawn to dark (from “can see, ’til can’t”), in both the heat of
summer and the cold of winter. The Civil War brought an end to slavery but
not to racial oppression. Slavery was followed by the Jim Crow era of legal
segregation: Black people in the South were forbidden by law to use the same
schools, hospitals, restaurants, and restrooms as white people. Those who
spoke out against this system were subjected to beatings, firebombings, rapes,
and murder—hundreds of African Americans were lynched in the early 1900s
by white vigilantes. Today, African Americans have equal rights under the law,
but in fact they are far from equal. Compared with white children, black chil-
dren are twice as likely to live in poverty and to die in infancy.33 There have
always been two Americas, one for whites and one for blacks.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
The Hartford Convention.
This opposition finally culminated in the assembling of a

convention at Hartford, at which delegates were present from all of
the New England states. They sat for three weeks with closed doors,
and issued an address which will be found in this volume in the book
devoted to political platforms. It was charged by the Democrats that
the real object of the convention was to negotiate a separate treaty of
peace, on behalf of New England, with Great Britain, but this charge
was as warmly denied. The exact truth has not since been discovered,
the fears of the participants of threatened trials for treason, closing
their mouths, if their professions were false. The treaty of Ghent,
which was concluded on December 14th, 1814, prevented other
action by the Hartford convention than that stated. It had assembled
nine days before the treaty, which is as follows:
Treaty of Ghent.
This treaty was negotiated by the Right Honorable James Lord

Gambier, Henry Goulburn, Esq., and William Adams, Esq., on the
part of Great Britain, and John Quincy Adams, James A. Bayard,
Henry Clay, Jonathan Russell, and Albert Gallatin, on behalf of the
United States.
The treaty can be found on p. 218, vol. 8, of Little & Brown’s
Statutes at Large. The first article provided for the restoration of all
archives, records, or property taken by either party from the other
during the war. This article expressly provides for the restoration of
“slaves or other private property.” The second article provided for the
cessation of hostilities and limitation of time of capture. The third
article provided for the restoration of prisoners of war.
The fourth article defined the boundary established by the treaty of
1783, and provided for commissioners to mark the same.
The fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth articles established rules to
govern the proceedings of the commissioners.
The ninth article bound the United States and His Britannic
Majesty to end all hostilities with Indian tribes, with whom they were
then respectively at war.
The tenth article reads as follows:—
“Whereas the traffic in slaves is irreconcilable with the principles of humanity
and justice; and, whereas, both His Majesty and the United States are desirous of
continuing their efforts to promote its entire abolition, it is hereby agreed that both
the contracting parties shall use their best endeavors to accomplish so desirable an
object.”
The eleventh and last article provides for binding effect of the
treaty, upon the exchange of ratifications.
The position of New England in the war is explained somewhat by
her exposed position. Such of the militia as served endured great
hardships, and they were almost constantly called from their homes
to meet new dangers. Distrusting their loyalty, the general
government had withheld all supplies from the militia of
Massachusetts and Connecticut for the year 1814, and these States
were forced to bear the burden of supporting them, at the same time
contributing their quota of taxes to the general government—
hardships, by the way, not greater than those borne by Pennsylvania
and Ohio in the late war for the Union, nor half as hard as those
borne by the border States at the same time. True, the coast towns of
Massachusetts were subjected to constant assault from the British
navy, and the people of these felt that they were defenceless. It was
on their petition that the legislature of Massachusetts finally, by a
vote of 226 to 67, adopted the report favoring the calling of the
Hartford Convention. A circular was then addressed to the
Governors of the other States, with a request that it be laid before
their legislatures, inviting them to appoint delegates, and stating that
the object was to deliberate upon the dangers to which the eastern
section was exposed, “and to devise, if practicable, means of security
and defence which might be consistent with the preservation of their
resources from total ruin, and not repugnant to their obligations as
members of the Union.” The italicized portion shows that there was
at least then no design of forming a separate treaty, or of promoting
disunion. The legislatures of Connecticut and Rhode Island endorsed
the call and sent delegates. Those of New Hampshire and Vermont
did not, but delegates were sent by local conventions. These
delegates, it is hardly necessary to remark, were all members of the
Federal party, and their suspected designs and action made the
“Hartford Convention” a bye-word and reproach in the mouths of
Democratic orators for years thereafter. It gave to the Democrats, as
did the entire history of the war, the prestige of superior patriotism,
and they profited by it as long as the memory of the war of 1812 was
fresh. Indeed, directly after the war, all men seemed to keep in
constant view the reluctance of the Federalists to support the war,
and their almost open hostility to it in New England. Peace brought
prosperity and plenty, but not oblivion of the old political issues, and
this was the beginning of the end of the Federal party. Its decay
thereafter was rapid and constant.
The eleventh, twelfth and thirteenth Congresses had continued
Democratic. The fourteenth began Dec. 4, 1815, with the Democratic
majority in the House increased to 30. Clay had taken part in
negotiating the treaty, and on his return was again elected to the
House, and was for the third time elected speaker. Though 65
Federalists had been elected, but 10 were given to Federal candidates
for speaker, this party now showing a strong, and under the
circumstances, a very natural desire to rub out party lines. The
internal taxes and the postage rates were reduced.
The Protective Tariff.
President Madison, in his message, had urged upon Congress a

revision of the tariff, and pursuant to his recommendation what was
at the time called a protective tariff was passed. Even Calhoun then
supported it, while Clay proclaimed that protection must no longer
be secondary to revenue, but of primary importance. The rates fixed,
however, were insufficient, and many American manufactures were
soon frustrated by excessive importations of foreign manufactures.
The position of Calhoun and Lowndes, well known leaders from
South Carolina, is explained by the fact that just then the proposal of
a protective tariff was popular in the south, in view of the heavy
duties upon raw cotton which England then imposed. The
Federalists in weakness changed their old position when they found
the Democrats advocating a tariff, and the latter quoted and
published quite extensively Alexander Hamilton’s early report in
favor of it. Webster, in the House at the time and a leading
Federalist, was against the bill. The parties had exchanged positions
on the question.
Peace brought with it another exchange of positions. President
Madison, although he had vetoed a bill to establish a National Bank
in 1815, was now (in 1816) anxious for the establishment of such an
institution. Clay had also changed his views, and claimed that the
experiences of the war showed the necessity for a national currency.
The bill met with strong opposition from a few Democrats and nearly
all of the Federalists (the latter having changed position on the
question since 1811), but it passed and was signed by the President.
A bill to promote internal improvements, advocated by Clay, was
at first favored by Madison, but his mind changed and he vetoed the
measure—the first of its kind passed by Congress.
The Democratic members of Congress, before the adjournment of
the first session, held a caucus for the nomination of candidates to
succeed Madison and Gerry. It was understood that the retiring
officers and their confidential friends favored James Monroe of
Virginia. Their wishes were carried out, but not without a struggle,
Wm. H. Crawford of Georgia receiving 54 votes against 65 for
Monroe. The Democrats opposed to Virginia’s domination in the
politics of the country, made a second effort, and directed it against
Monroe in the caucus. Aaron Burr denounced him as an improper
and incompetent candidate, and joined in the protest then made
against any nomination by a Congressional caucus; he succeeding in
getting nineteen Democrats to stay out of the caucus. Later he
advised renewed attempts to break down the Congressional caucus
system, and before the nomination favored Andrew Jackson as a
means to that end. Daniel B. Tompkins was nominated by the
Democrats for Vice-President. The Federalists named Rufus King of
New York, but in the election which followed he received but 24 out
of 217 electoral votes. The Federalists divided their votes for Vice-
President.
Monroe was inaugurated on the 14th of March, 1817, the oath
being administered by Chief Justice Marshall. The inaugural address
was so liberal in its tone that it seemed to give satisfaction to men of
all shades of political opinion. The questions which had arisen during
the war no longer had any practical significance, while the people
were anxious to give the disturbing ones which ante-dated at least a
season of rest. Two great and opposing policies had previously
obtained, and singularly enough each seemed exactly adapted to the
times when they were triumphant. The Federal power had been
asserted in a government which had gathered renewed strength
during what was under the circumstances a great and perilous war,
and the exigencies of that war in many instances compelled the
Republicans or Democrats, or the Democratic-Republicans as some
still called them, to concede points which had theretofore been in
sharp dispute, and they did it with that facility which only Americans
can command in emergencies: yet as a party they kept firm hold of
the desire to enlarge the scope of liberty in its application to the
citizens, and just here kept their original landmark.
It is not singular then that the administration of Monroe opened
what has ever since been known in politics as the “Era of Good
Feeling.” Party differences rapidly subsided, and political serenity
was the order of the day. Monroe made a tour of the States, with the
direct object of inspecting fortifications and means of defence, and in
this way spread the good feeling, without seeming to have any such
object. He was everywhere favorably greeted by the people, and
received by delegations which in many instances were specially made
up of all shades of opinion.
The Cabinet was composed of men of rare political distinction,
even in that day of great men. It was probably easier to be great then
than now, just as it is easier to be a big political hero in the little State
of Delaware than it is in the big States of New York or Pennsylvania.
Yet these men were universally accepted as great without regard to
their localities. All were Republicans or Democrats, with John
Quincy Adams as Secretary of State, Wm. H. Crawford (Monroe’s
competitor for the nomination) as Secretary of the Treasury, John C.
Calhoun as Secretary of War, William Wirt as Attorney-General. All
of these united with the President in the general desire to call a halt
upon the political asperities which were then recognized as a public
evil. On one occasion, during his tour, the citizens of Kennebunk and
its vicinity, in Maine, having in their address alluded to the prospects
of a political union among the people in support of the
administration, the President said in reply:
“You are pleased to express a confident hope that a spirit of mutual
conciliation may be one of the blessings which may result from my
administration. This indeed would be an eminent blessing, and I
pray it may be realized. Nothing but union is waiting to make us a
great people. The present time affords the happiest presage that this
union is fast consummating. It cannot be otherwise; I daily see
greater proofs of it. The further I advance in my progress in the
country, the more I perceive that we are all Americans—that we
compose but one family—that our republican institutions will be
supported and perpetuated by the united zeal and patriotism of all.
Nothing could give me greater satisfaction than to behold a perfect
union among ourselves—a union which is necessary to restore to
social intercourse its former charms, and to render our happiness, as
a nation, unmixed and complete. To promote this desirable result
requires no compromise of principle, and I promise to give it my
continued attention, and my best endeavors.”
Even General Jackson, since held up to public view by historians
as the most austere and “stalwart” of all politicians, caught the sweet
infection of peace, and thus advised President Monroe:—
“Now is the time to exterminate that monster, called party spirit.
By selecting [for cabinet officers] characters most conspicuous for
their probity, virtue, capacity, and firmness, without regard to party,
you will go far to, if not entirely, eradicate those feelings, which, on
former occasions, threw so many obstacles in the way of government.
The chief magistrate of a great and powerful nation should never
indulge in party feelings. His conduct should be liberal and
disinterested; always bearing in mind, that he acts for the whole and
not a part of the community.”
This advice had been given with a view to influence the
appointment of a mixed political Cabinet, but while Monroe
professed to believe that a free government could exist without
political parties, he nevertheless sought to bring all of the people into
one political fold, and that the Democratic. Yet he certainly and
plainly sought to allay factions in his own party, and with this view
selected Crawford for the Treasury—the gentleman who had been so
warmly supported in the nominating struggle by the Clintonians and
by all who objected to the predominating influence of Virginia in
national politics.
Monroe, like his immediate predecessor, accepted and acted upon
the doctrines of the new school of Republicans as represented by
Clay and Calhoun, both of whom still favored a tariff, while Clay had
become a warm advocate of a national system of internal
improvements. These two statesmen thus early differed on some
questions, but they were justly regarded as the leading friends and
advisers of the administration, for to both still clung the patriotic
recollections of the war which they had so warmly advocated and
supported, and the issue of which attested their wisdom. Clay
preferred to be called a Republican; Calhoun preferred to be called a
Democrat, and just then the terms were so often exchanged and
mingled that history is at fault in the exact designation, while
tradition is colored by the bias of subsequent events and lives.
Monroe’s first inaugural leaned toward Clay’s scheme of internal
improvements, but questioned its constitutionality. Clay was next to
Jefferson the most original of all our statesmen and politicians. He
was prolific in measures, and almost resistless in their advocacy.
From a political standpoint he was the most direct author of the war
of 1812, for his advocacy mainly brought it to the issue of arms,
which through him and Calhoun were substituted for diplomacy.
And Calhoun then stood in broader view before the country than
since. His sectional pride and bias had been rarely aroused, and like
Clay he seemed to act for the country as an entirety. Subsequent
sectional issues changed the views held of him by the people of both
the North and South.
We have said that Monroe leaned toward internal improvements,
but he thought Congress was not clothed by the Constitution with the
power to authorize measures supporting it, and when the
opportunity was presented (May 4, 1822) he vetoed the bill “for the
preservation and repair of the Cumberland road,” and accompanied
the veto with a most elaborate message in which he discussed the
constitutional aspects of the question. A plain majority of the friends
of the administration, under the leadership of Clay, supported the
theory of internal improvements from the time the administration
began, but were reluctant to permit a division of the party on the
question.
Mississippi and Illinois were admitted to the Union during the
“Era of Good Feeling,” without serious political disturbance, while
Alabama was authorized to form a state constitution and
government, and Arkansas was authorized as a separate territorial
government from part of Missouri. In 1819 President Monroe made a
tour through the Southern States to examine their defenses and see
and get acquainted with the people. From the first inauguration of
Monroe up to 1819 party lines can hardly be said to have existed, but
in the sixteenth session of Congress, which continued until May,
1820, new questions of national interest arose, prominent among
which were additional protective duties for our manufactures;
internal improvements by the government; acknowledgments of the
independence of the South American States.
The Monroe Doctrine.
Upon the question of recognizing the independence of the South

American States, the President made a record which has ever since
been quoted and denominated “The Monroe Doctrine.” It is
embodied in the following abstract of his seventh annual message,
under date of Dec. 2d, 1823:
“It was stated, at the commencement of the last session, that a
great effort was then making in Spain and Portugal to improve the
condition of the people of those countries, and that it appeared to be
conducted with extraordinary moderation. It need scarcely be
remarked that the result has been, so far, very different from what
was then anticipated. Of events in that quarter of the globe, with
which we have so much intercourse, and from which we derive our
origin, we have always been anxious and interested spectators. The
citizens of the United States cherish sentiments the most friendly in
favor of the liberty and happiness of their fellow-men on that side of
the Atlantic. In the wars of the European powers, in matters relating
to themselves, we have never taken any part nor does it comport with
our policy to do so. It is only when rights are invaded or seriously
menaced, that we resent injuries, or make preparation for our
defense. With the movements in this hemisphere we are of necessity
more immediately connected, and by causes which must be obvious
to all enlightened and impartial observers. The political system of the
allied powers is essentially different in this respect from that of
America. This difference proceeds from that which exists in their
respective governments. And to the defense of our own, which has
been achieved by the loss of so much blood and treasure, and
matured by the wisdom of their most enlightened citizens, and under
which we have enjoyed unexampled felicity, this whole nation is
devoted. We owe it, therefore, to candor, and to the amicable
relations existing between the United States and those powers, to
declare, that we should consider any attempt on their part to extend
their system to any portion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our
peace and safety. With the existing colonies or dependencies of any
European power we have not interfered, and shall not interfere. But
with the governments who have declared their independence, and
maintained it, and whose independence we have, on great
consideration, and on just principles, acknowledged, we could not
view any interposition for the purpose of oppressing them, or
controlling in any other manner their destiny, by any European
power, in any other light than as the manifestation of an unfriendly
disposition toward the United States. In the war between those new
governments and Spain, we declared our neutrality at the time of
their recognition, and to this we have adhered, and shall continue to
adhere, provided no change shall occur which, in the judgment of the
competent authorities of this government, shall make a
corresponding change on the part of the United States indispensable
to their security.
“The late events in Spain and Portugal show that Europe is still
unsettled. Of this important fact no stronger proof can be adduced,
than that the allied powers should have thought it proper, on a
principle satisfactory to themselves, to have interposed by force in
the internal concerns of Spain. To what extent such interposition
may be carried, on the same principle, is a question to which all
independent powers, whose governments differ from theirs, are
interested; even those most remote, and surely none more so than
the United States. Our policy in regard to Europe, which was adopted
at an early stage of the wars which have so long agitated that quarter
of the globe, nevertheless remains the same, which is, not to interfere
in the internal concerns of any of its powers; to consider the
government, de facto, as the legitimate government for us: to
cultivate friendly relations with it, and to preserve those relations by
a frank, firm, and manly policy; meeting, in all instances, the just
claims of every power, submitting to injuries from none. But in
regard to these continents, circumstances are eminently and
conspicuously different. It is impossible that the allied powers should
extend their political system to any portion of either continent
without endangering our peace and happiness; nor can any one
believe, that our southern brethren, if left to themselves, would adopt
it of their own accord. It is equally impossible, therefore, that we
should behold such interposition, in any form, with indifference. If
we look to the comparative strength and resources of Spain and
those new governments, and their distance from each other, it must
be obvious that she can never subdue them. It is still the true policy
of the United States to leave the parties to themselves, in the hope
that other powers will pursue the same course.”
The second election of Monroe, in 1820, was accomplished without
a contest. Out of 231 electoral votes, but one was cast against him,
and that for John Quincy Adams. Mr. Tompkins, the candidate for
Vice-President, was only a little less fortunate, there being 14
scattering votes against him. Neither party, if indeed there was a
Federalist party left made any nominations.
The Missouri Compromise.
The second session of the 17th Congress opened on the 4th day of
March, 1820, with James Monroe at the head of the Executive
Department of the Government, and the Democratic party in the
majority in both branches of the Federal Legislature. The Cabinet at
that time was composed of the most brilliant minds of the country,
indeed as most justly remarked by Senator Thomas H. Benton in his
published review of the events of that period, it would be difficult to
find in any government, in any country, at any time, more talent and
experience, more dignity and decorum, more purity of private life, a
larger mass of information, and more addiction to business, than was
comprised in the list of celebrated names then constituting the
executive department of the government. The legislative department
was equally impressive. The exciting and agitating question then
pending before Congress was on the admission of the State of
Missouri into the Federal Union, the subject of the issue being the
attempted tacking on of conditions restricting slavery within her
limits. She was admitted without conditions under the so-called
compromise, which abolished it in certain portions of the then
province of Louisiana. In this controversy, the compromise was
sustained and carried entirely by the Democratic Senators and
members from the Southern and slaveholding States aided and
sanctioned by the Executive, and it was opposed by fifteen Senators
from non-slaveholding States, who represented the opposite side on
the political questions of the day. It passed the House by a close vote
of 86 to 82. It has been seriously questioned since whether this act
was constitutional. The real struggle was political, and for the
balance of power. For a while it threatened the total overthrow of all
political parties upon principle, and the substitution of geographical
parties discriminated by the slave line, and thus destroying the
proper action of the Federal government, and leading to a separation
of the States. It was a federal movement, accruing to the benefit of
that party, and at first carried all the Northern democracy in its
current, giving the supremacy to their adversaries. When this effect
was perceived, democrats from the northern non-slaveholding States
took early opportunity to prevent their own overthrow, by voting for
the admission of the States on any terms, and thus prevent the
eventual separation of the States in the establishment of
geographical parties divided by a slavery and anti-slavery line.
The year 1820 marked a period of financial distress in the country,
which soon became that of the government. The army was reduced,
and the general expenses of the departments cut down, despite
which measures of economy the Congress deemed it necessary to
authorize the President to contract for a loan of five million dollars.
Distress was the cry of the day; relief the general demand, the chief
demand coming from debtors to the Government for public lands
purchased under the then credit system, this debt at that time
aggregating twenty-three millions of dollars. The banks failed,
money vanished, instalments were coming due which could not be
met; and the opening of Congress in November, 1820, was saluted by
the arrival of memorials from all the new States praying for the relief
to the purchaser of the public lands. The President referred to it in
his annual message of that year, and Congress passed a measure of
relief by changing the system to cash sales instead of credit, reducing
the price of the lands, and allowing present debtors to apply
payments already made to portions of the land purchased,
relinquishing the remainder. Applications were made at that time for
the establishment of the preemptive system, but without effect; the
new States continued to press the question and finally prevailed, so
that now the preemptive principle has become a fixed part of our
land system, permanently incorporated with it, and to the equal
advantage of the settler and the government.
The session of 1820–21, is remarkable as being the first at which
any proposition was made in Congress for the occupation and
settlement of our territory on the Columbia river—the only part then
owned by the United States on the Pacific coast. It was made by Dr.
Floyd, a representative from Virginia, who argued that the
establishment of a civilized power on the American coast of the
Pacific could not fail to produce great and wonderful benefits not
only to our own country, but to the people of Eastern Asia, China and
Japan on the opposite side of the Pacific Ocean, and that the valley of
the Columbia might become the granary of China and Japan. This
movement suggested to Senator Benton, to move, for the first time
publicly in the United States, a resolution to send ministers to the
Oriental States.
At this time treaties with Mexico and Spain were ratified, by which
the United States acquired Florida and ceded Texas; these treaties,
together with the Missouri compromise—a measure
contemporaneous with them—extinguished slave soil in all the
United States territory west of the Mississippi, except in that portion
which was to constitute the State of Arkansas; and, including the
extinction in Texas consequent upon its cession to a non-
slaveholding power, constituted the largest territorial abolition of
slavery that was ever up to that period effected by any political power
of any nation.
The outside view of the slave question in the United States, at this
time, is that the extension of slavery was then arrested,
circumscribed, and confined within narrow territorial limits, while
free States were permitted an almost unlimited expansion.
In 1822 a law passed Congress abolishing the Indian factory
system, which had been established during Washington’s
administration, in 1796, under which the Government acted as a
factor or agent for the sale of supplies to the Indians and the
purchase of furs from them; this branch of the service then belonged
to the department of the Secretary of War. The abuses discovered in
it led to the discontinuance of that system.
The Presidential election of 1824 was approaching, the candidates
were in the field, their respective friends active and busy, and
popular topics for the canvass in earnest requisition. Congress was
full of projects for different objects of internal improvement, mainly
in roads and canals, and the friends of each candidate exerted
themselves in rivalry of each other, under the supposition that their
opinions would stand for those of their principals. An act for the
preservation of the Cumberland Road, which passed both houses of
Congress, met with a veto from President Monroe, accompanied by a
state paper in exposition of his opinions upon the whole subject of
Federal interference in matters of inter state commerce and roads
and canals. He discussed the measure in all its bearings, and plainly
showed it to be unconstitutional. After stating the question, he
examined it under every head of constitutional derivation under
which its advocates claimed the power, and found it to be granted by
no one of them and virtually prohibited by some of them. This was
then and has since been considered to be the most elaborate and
thoroughly considered opinion upon the general question which has
ever been delivered by any American statesman. This great state
paper, delivered at a time when internal improvement by the federal
government had become an issue in the canvass for the Presidency
and was ardently advocated by three of the candidates and qualified
by two others, had an immense current in its power, carrying with it
many of the old strict constructionists.
The revision of the tariff, with a view to the protection of home
industry, and to the establishment of what was then called “The
American System,” was one of the large subjects before Congress at
the session of 1823–24, and was the regular commencement of the
heated debates on that question which afterwards ripened into a
serious difficulty between the federal government and some of the
Southern States. The presidential election being then depending, the
subject became tinctured with party politics, in which so far as that
ingredient was concerned, and was not controlled by other
considerations, members divided pretty much on the line which
always divided them on a question of constructive powers. The
protection of domestic industry not being among the powers granted,
was looked for in the incidental; and denied by the strict
constructionists to be a substantive term, to be exercised for the
direct purpose of protection; but admitted by all at that time and
ever since the first tariff act of 1789, to be an incident to the revenue
raising power, and an incident to be regarded in the exercise of that
power. Revenue the object, protection the incident, had been the rule
in the earlier tariffs; now that rule was sought to be reversed, and to
make protection the object of the law, and revenue the incident. Mr.
Henry Clay was the leader in the proposed revision and the
champion of the American system; he was ably supported in the
House by many able and effective speakers; who based their
argument on the general distress then alleged to be prevalent in the
country. Mr. Daniel Webster was the leading speaker on the other
side, and disputed the universality of the distress which had been
described; and contested the propriety of high or prohibitory duties,
in the present active and intelligent state of the world, to stimulate
industry and manufacturing enterprise.
The bill was carried by a close vote in both Houses. Though
brought forward avowedly for the protection of domestic
manufactures, it was not entirely supported on that ground; an
increase of revenue being the motive with some, the public debt then
being nearly ninety millions. An increased protection to the products
of several States, as lead in Missouri and Illinois, hemp in Kentucky,
iron in Pennsylvania, wool in Ohio and New York, commanded many
votes for the bill; and the impending presidential election had its
influence in its favor.
Two of the candidates, Messrs. Adams and Clay, voted for and
avowedly supported General Jackson, who voted for the bill, was for
it, as tending to give a home supply of the articles necessary in time
of war, and as raising revenue to pay the public debt; Mr. Crawford
was opposed to it, and Mr. Calhoun had withdrawn as a Presidential
candidate. The Southern planting States were dissatisfied, believing
that the new burdens upon imports which it imposed, fell upon the
producers of the exports, and tended to enrich one section of the
Union at the expense of another. The attack and support of the bill
took much of a sectional aspect; Virginia, the two Carolinas, Georgia,
and some others, being unanimous against it. Pennsylvania, New
York, Ohio, and Kentucky being unanimous for it. Massachusetts,
which up to this time had no small influence in commerce, voted,
with all, except one member, against it. With this sectional aspect, a
tariff for protection, also began to assume a political aspect, being
taken under the care of the party, afterwards denominated as Whig.
The bill was approved by President Monroe; a proof that that careful
and strict constructionist of the constitution did not consider it as
deprived of its revenue character by the degree of protection which it
extended.
A subject which at the present time is exciting much criticism, viz:
proposed amendments to the constitution relative to the election of
President and Vice-President, had its origin in movements in that
direction taken by leading Democrats during the campaign of 1824.
The electoral college has never been since the early elections, an
independent body free to select a President and Vice-President;
though in theory they have been vested with such powers, in practice
they have no such practical power over the elections, and have had
none since their institution. In every case the elector has been an
instrument, bound to obey a particular impulsion, and disobedience
to which would be attended with infamy, and with every penalty
which public indignation could inflict. From the beginning they have
stood pledged to vote for the candidate indicated by the public will;
and have proved not only to be useless, but an inconvenient
intervention between the people and the object of their choice. Mr.
McDuffie in the House of Representatives and Mr. Benton in the
Senate, proposed amendments; the mode of taking the direct vote to
be in districts, and the persons receiving the greatest number of
votes for President or Vice-President in any district, to count one
vote for such office respectively which is nothing but substituting the
candidates themselves for their electoral representatives.
In the election of 1824 four candidates were before the people for
the office of President, General Jackson, John Quincy Adams,
William H. Crawford and Henry Clay. None of them received a
majority of the 261 electoral votes, and the election devolved upon
the House of Representatives. John C. Calhoun had a majority of the
electoral votes for the office of Vice-President, and was elected. Mr.
Adams was elected President by the House of Representatives,
although General Jackson was the choice of the people, having
received the greatest number of votes at the general election. The
election of Mr. Adams was perfectly constitutional, and as such fully
submitted to by the people; but it was a violation of the demos krateo
principle; and that violation was equally rebuked. All the
representatives who voted against the will of their constituents, lost
their favor, and disappeared from public life. The representation in
the House of Representatives was largely changed at the first general
election, and presented a full opposition to the new President. Mr.
Adams himself was injured by it, and at the ensuing presidential
election was beaten by General Jackson more than two to one.
Mr. Clay, who took the lead in the House for Mr. Adams, and
afterwards took upon himself the mission of reconciling the people to
his election in a series of public speeches, was himself crippled in the
effort, lost his place in the democratic party, and joined the Whigs
(then called the national republicans). The democratic principle was
victor over the theory of the Constitution, and beneficial results
ensued. It vindicated the people in their right and their power. It re-
established parties upon the basis of principle, and drew anew party
lines, then almost obliterated under the fusion of parties during the
“era of good feeling,” and the efforts of leading men to make personal
parties for themselves. It showed the conservative power of our
government to lie in the people, more than in its constituted
authorities. It showed that they were capable of exercising the
function of self-government, and lastly, it assumed the supremacy of
the democracy for a long time, and until lost by causes to be referred
to hereafter. The Presidential election of 1824 is remarkable under
another aspect—its results cautioned all public men against future
attempts to govern presidential elections in the House of
Representatives; and it put an end to the practice of caucus
nominations for the Presidency by members of Congress. This mode
of concentrating public opinion began to be practiced as the eminent
men of the Revolution, to whom public opinion awarded a
preference, were passing away, and when new men, of more equal
pretensions, were coming upon the stage. It was tried several times
with success and general approbation, because public sentiment was
followed—not led—by the caucus. It was attempted in 1824 and
failed; all the opponents of Mr. Crawford, by their joint efforts,
succeeded, and justly in the fact though not in the motive, in
rendering these Congress caucus nominations odious to the people,
and broke them down. They were dropped, and a different mode
adopted—that of party nominations by conventions of delegates from
the States.
The administration of Mr. Adams commenced with his inaugural
address, in which the chief topic was that of internal national
improvement by the federal government. This declared policy of the
administration furnished a ground of opposition against Mr. Adams,
and went to the reconstruction of parties on the old line of strict, or
latitudinous, construction of the Constitution. It was clear from the
beginning that the new administration was to have a settled and
strong opposition, and that founded in principles of government—
the same principles, under different forms, which had discriminated
parties at the commencement of the federal government. Men of the
old school—survivors of the contest of the Adams and Jefferson
times, with some exceptions, divided accordingly—the federalists
going for Mr. Adams, the republicans against him, with the mass of
the younger generation. The Senate by a decided majority, and the
House by a strong minority, were opposed to the policy of the new
President.
In 1826 occurred the famous debates in the Senate and the House,
on the proposed Congress of American States, to contract alliances to
guard against and prevent the establishment of any future European
colony within its borders. The mission though sanctioned was never
acted upon or carried out. It was authorized by very nearly a party
vote, the democracy as a party being against it. The President, Mr.
Adams, stated the objects of the Congress to be as follows: “An
agreement between all the parties represented at the meeting, that
each will guard, by its own means, against the establishment of any
future European colony within its own borders, may be advisable.
This was, more than two years since, announced by my predecessor
to the world, as a principle resulting from the emancipation of both
the American continents. It may be so developed to the new southern
nations, that they may feel it as an essential appendage to their
independence.”
Mr. Adams had been a member of Mr. Monroe’s cabinet, filling the
department from which the doctrine would emanate. The
enunciation by him as above of this “Monroe Doctrine,” as it is
called, is very different from what it has of late been supposed to be,
as binding the United States to guard all the territory of the New
World from European colonization. The message above quoted was
written at a time when the doctrine as enunciated by the former
President through the then Secretary was fresh in the mind of the
latter, and when he himself in a communication to the American
Senate was laying it down for the adoption of all the American
nations in a general congress of their deputies. According to
President Adams, this “Monroe Doctrine” (according to which it has
been of late believed that the United States were to stand guard over
the two Americas, and repulse all intrusive colonists from their
shores), was entirely confined to our own borders; that it was only
proposed to get the other States of the New World to agree that, each
for itself, and by its own means, should guard its own territories;
and, consequently, that the United States, so far from extending
gratuitous protection to the territories of other States, would neither
give, nor receive, aid in any such enterprise, but that each should use

Ebook We The People An Introduction To American Government PDF Full Chapter PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ebook We The People An Introduction To American Government PDF Full Chapter PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

We the people : an introduction to

American government - eBook PDF

Connect Government is an application-based assignment platform containing engaging, user-

Applied Critical Thinking

Practice Government Missions

Interactive Data Analysis

“I can honestly say that the first time

87% 75% I used SmartBook after reading a

To learn more about American government, visit the

Names: Patterson, Thomas E.

Thomas E. Patterson is Bradlee Professor of Govern-

A Letter from the Author xix

Learning to Think Critically 3

Political Culture: Americans’ Enduring Beliefs 7

Politics and Power in America 16

The Text’s Organization 23

Before the Constitution:

The Articles of Confederation 32

Negotiating Toward a Constitution 34

Protecting Liberty: Limited Government 42

Providing for Representative Government 52

Constitutional Democracy Today 59

Federalism: National and State Sovereignty 65

Federalism in Historical Perspective 74

Contemporary Federalism (Since 1937) 83

The Public’s Influence: Setting the Boundaries

The Bill of Rights, the Fourteenth Amendment,

Freedom of Expression 101

Freedom of Religion 108

The Right to Bear Arms 112

The Right of Privacy 113

Rights of Persons Accused of Crimes 116

Rights and the War on Terrorism 126

The Courts and A Free Society 129

Equality Through Law 134

The Struggle for Equality 146

Discrimination: Superficial Differences, Deep Divisions 161

The Measurement of Public Opinion 166

Political Socialization: The Origins of Americans’ Opinions 173

Frames of Reference: How Americans Think Politically 178

The Influence of Public Opinion on Policy 187

Voter Participation 197

Conventional Forms of Participation Other Than Voting 208

Unconventional Activism: Political Movements and Protests 212

Participation and the Potential for Influence 217

Party Competition and Majority Rule 222

Electoral and Party Systems 231

Parties and Candidates in the Campaign 239

Parties, Candidates, and the Public’s Influence 250

The Interest-Group System 258

Inside Lobbying: Seeking Influence Through

Outside Lobbying: Seeking Influence Through

The Group System: Indispensable but Biased in

Media Change: From the Nation’s Founding to Today 289

The Media: Content and Functions 297

Media Audiences and Effects 307

Congress as a Career: Election to Congress 320

Parties and Party Leadership 329

Committees and Committee Leadership 336

How a Bill Becomes Law 341

Congress’s Policymaking Role 345

Congress: An Institution Divided 355

Foundations of the Modern Presidency 363