fea Nae
Preventing health problems
g
~]
rH]
=
“J
=
a]
rs
=
=
~
4
oy
=
e
=
=
Se
>
c
Ss
i
=
a
ry
ryOBJECTIVES
By the end of the chapter you should have an understanding of the
effectiveness of the following approaches to changing health damaging
behaviours:
- Individually based interventions including risk factor screening
programmes, motivational interview-based interventions, and problem-
focused approaches
- Using the mass media, including information framing, population
targeting and the use of fear
- environmental interventions, including increasing cues to action,
minimising the costs of healthy behaviour and increasing the costs of
unhealthy behaviour
- Public health programmes focusing on reducing risk for coronary heart
disease and increasing safer sex
- Worksite public health
- School-based interventions
- Using new technologiesCONTENTS
1. Working with individuals
2. Mass persuasion through the media
3. Environmental interventions
4. Public health programmes
5. Using technologyWorking with individuals
Providing health information
Simplest way to motivate and facilitate behaviour change = informing
people of their risk of disease
— knowledge will evoke behaviour e.g screening for coronary heart
disease (CHD) following high cholesterol levels.Working with individuals
Risk factor screening programmes
- Early screening programmes = very general, 1994 OXCHECK
developed a programme which offered all adults participating in
primary care a ‘health check’ which identified risk behaviours and were
required to be followed up with advice to change. Small changes were
seen but not enough and on a too small scale.
- Now more specific ones are used e.g. direct advice from your doctor
to stop smoking.
TTWorking with individuals
Motivational interviewing
- More sophisticated approach to triggering behaviour change
particularly for those with low motivation.
- Initially used for substance abuse.
- Now used more generally - fruit and veg consumption etc
- Increasing effectiveness of motivational interviewing = integrate it
within more complex programmes of change.Working with individuals
Problem focused approaches
- More effective than simply providing information.
- More complex intervention addressing behaviour through:
motivational interviewing + problem focused counselling + taken
through real life examples = most effective.Working with individuals
Problem focused approaches
— Studies have found that anxiety is a prominent predictor as to why
people don't go and get screened.
- The only way to combat this is educating on anxiety management
skills and further insight into what happens at screenings.
E.g a coping booklet with info about the experience of the procedure,
likely outcomes of procedure and relaxation techniques.Mass persuasion through the media
- Public health initiatives targeted at whole populations.
- First one used a hypodermic model of behaviour change, assuming a
stable link between knowledge, attitudes and behaviour
— ‘inject’ appropriate info to recipients, then their attitude
would change and in turn influence their behaviour. Key to success was
thought to be making it persuasive + from good sources.Mass persuasion through the media
- Crosby et al. (2019), for example, revealed the questions asked in the
planning process of a series of advertisements targeted at young
smokers.
- Despite this being published in a high impact health journal, while
reading the list, note the absence of any clear link to psychological
theory and practice:
TT 4Mass persuasion through the media
Will this be unexpected?
Does the advert
incontrovertible scientific
data to support its message?
include
Does the advert address the problem in
a novel manner?
Is the message likely to surprise
recipients?
Does the intervention involve the
innovative use of technology and/or
media?
Will this make young people stop and
think?
Does the intervention involve a new
insight into the issue?
Will this elicit an emotional reaction?
Is the planned intervention likely to
elicit a powerful
emotional reaction?
Is the idea so compelling that a
young person will bring it to mind
when they are offered a cigarette?
Is the idea so compelling that a
young person will bring it to mind
when they are offered a cigarette?
Will it be memorable?
__ TT 7 7Mass persuasion through the media
Will the planned programme elicit
feelings of health
threat, disgust, or guilt in the moment
of smoking?
Will it make young smokers rethink
whether the immediate
pleasure of smoking is worth its
long-term health
costs?
Is there immediacy to the message?
Does this execution make the health
consequence feel more tangible, more
contemporary, and more urgent?
Could the ideas in the message be so
relevant that they change how young
people think, be parodied in other
contexts or even become integrated
into young people's idiom?
Could it change social norms?
Will young people reject the
message on the grounds that bad
things only happen to adults or
long-term smokers?
_ I 7Mass persuasion through the media
Using the mass media
Central route
Peripheral route
Figure. The elaboration likedhood model of persuasive communication
_ TT 7 3Mass persuasion through the media
Using the mass media
- However... What is persuasive for each person? Different people trust
different sources
- One study attempted to increase walking exercise in scotland but to
no avail - had no influence on 70% of people
- Some argue that media campaigns are best used to raise awareness
of health issues rather than attempt to engender significant
behavioural change
_ TT 7 7Mass persuasion through the media
Using the mass media
- Behavioural change is most likely when media campaigns form one
element of a multimodal intervention or when the target behaviour is a
one-off or episodic behaviour, such as attending a vaccination or
screening clinic
- Cumulative effects of repeated media campaigns may influence
attitudes and behaviour
_ TT 7Mass persuasion through the media
Using the mass media
- Those involved in using the media to influence behaviour have
adopted a number of methods to maximise its effectiveness, including:
+ Refining communication to maximise its influence on
attitudes;
+ The use of fear messages;
+ Information framing;
+ Specific targeting of interventions
_ a T 6Mass persuasion through the media
Refining the message
- Majority of tests testing the elaboration likelihood model have shown
that information containing carefully chosen peripheral cues can
facilitate attitudinal change in people who are relatively unmotivated to
consider particular issues, or that combining central processing with
peripheral cues can enhance the effectiveness of some interventions
_ TT 7Mass persuasion through the media
Refining the message
- The real limitation of the ELM and other models of attitude change is
that although they can suggest means of maximising attitudinal
change, many other factors will influence whether any attitudinal
change or even behavioural intentions are translated into action
_ TT 7 3Mass persuasion through the media
The use of fear
- Interventions based entirely on fear arousal are likely to be of little
benefit.
- Studies have found that using high fear m messages targeting aids
prevention and safe sex practises found that althoufh the campaigns
increased HIV-related anxiety in audiences who witnessed them, they
didnt increase knowledge nor triggered any behavioural change.
- If fear messages are used, they need to be accompanied with simple,
easily accessible strategies of reducing the fear.
E.g. warnings of risk for skin cancer on Australian beaches being
accompanied by access to free sunscreen.
TTT |Mass persuasion through the media
Teaching coping strategies
- One of the barriers to attending screening for risk of disease is
concern about its outcome:
‘What will be found? Do I really want to know’?
- Fear may both prevent people engaging in screening programmes
and be an outcome of them, even when participants are found to carry
no or low additional risk of disease.
TTMass persuasion through the media
Teaching coping strategies
Marteau et al. (1996) considered the very specific impact of two booklets
given to women referred for colposcopy following an abnormal cervical
smear:
1. A medical information booklet provided details on the nature of
cervical abnormalities, the procedure and its likely outcomes than the
standard information booklet. However, it did not suggest any coping
strategies that the women might use.
2. A coping booklet provided brief information about the procedure they
were about to experience, information on the likely outcomes of the
procedure, and instructions on relaxation and distraction techniques they
could use to help them to cope before and during the procedure.
— T/T 7Mass persuasion through the media
Informational framing
- More neutral approach
- Either positive or negative outcomes emphasised
- When time is short and people aren't motivated to change
themselves, positive messages enhance information processing
_ TT 7Mass persuasion through the media
Informational framing
- Evidence is very conflicted about which is better for what - one study
found 40% people more likely to get HPV vaccinated if message was
positive while one study found that negatively framed messages were
more likely than positively framed messages to increase intentions of
young women to have the human papillomavirus vaccine — but only
among those who had multiple sexual partners and who infrequently
used condoms.
_ TT 7 3Mass persuasion through the media
Informational framing
- Overall, these data suggest that we can make no strong a priori
judgements about what type of framing will affect particular
populations
_— TT 1Mass persuasion through the media
Audience targeting
- Audience targeting can be based on a number
of factors, including: Three pricks.
+ Behaviour Why one
+ Age just isn’t enough.
+ Gender
+ Socioeconomic status 4 4 &
each of which is likely to influence the impact of
any message. Apes B information fr gry mem
- Audiences may also be segmented along more —_ Me? nnwys.daneunronin at wont
psychological factors such as their motivation to
consider change.
| T/TEnvironmental interventions
- The health belief model provides a simple guide to key environmental
factors that can be influenced in order to encourage behavioural change.
- The model suggests that an environment that encourages healthy
behaviour should:
+ Provide cues to action or remove cues to unhealthy behaviour;
+ Enable healthy behaviour by minimising the costs and barriers
associated with it;
+ Maximise the costs of engaging in health-damaging behaviour .
| TTEnvironmental interventions
Cues to action
- E.g. health warnings on cigarettes and nutritional information on
food
- May be of some benefit, although the evidence suggests that they
reinforce existing behaviour rather than prompt consideration of
behavioural change
- Partially due to poor understanding of the issues raised and/or the
low visibility of such cues
_ TT 7Environmental interventions
Cues to action
- Cues reminding people to engage in health-promoting behaviours
may also be of value. One simple example can be found in posters
reminding people to use stairs instead of lifts or escalators
- UK banned cigarette commercials in an attempt to reduce smoking
TT 2Environmental interventions
Minimising the costs of healthy behaviour
- The environment in which we live can either facilitate or inhibit our
level of engagement in health-related behavior.
- E.g, poor street lighting, pollution, busy roads etc inhibit people from
exercising outside.
- Down to governmental legislation and town planning e.g shops that
sell healthy food near housing estates - not just chip shops etc
TTEnvironmental interventions
Minimising the costs of healthy behaviour
- Accessibility to tracks, sports equipment, gym classes etc all increase
healthy behavioural change but not relaitistly possible to for example
lower all prices of gym memberships.
- Cycle lanes and more green space increase exercise levels but only
modestly.
- Another area is needle exchanges where addicts can exchange old
needles and get new ones reducing the risk of cross-infection of
bloodborne viruses, including HIV and hepatitis.
_ TT 5Environmental interventions
Increasing costs of unhealthy behaviour
- Economic measures related to public health have been largely
confined to taxation on tobacco and alcohol.
- A more moderate approach = restricting the number of outlets for
drugs such as alcohol - reduced nightclubs, bars etc as people have to
travel further to them = less likely to go + less advertisements n shop
windows BUT there was no association between outlet density and
frequency of ‘sensible’ drinking.
- A more direct form of control over smoking has been the
introduction of smoke-free work and social areas.
_ TT 7Public health programmes
Community intervention programmes
Stanford Three Towns project
- One of the first public health programmes targeted at whole towns
aimed to reduce the prevalence of key risk factors for CHD (smoking,
low levels of exercise, high fat consumption and high blood pressure)
across the entire adult population.
_ TT 3 5Public health programmes
Community intervention programmes
Stanford Three Towns project
- 1s town received no intervention, 2" = year long media campaign
targeting CHD relating behaviour (similar to stages of change model):
+ Started by alerting people to the need to change their
behaviour, followed by a series of programmes modelling behaviour
change - these were based on social learning theory and were aimed at
teaching skills and increasing recipients’ confidence in their ability to
change and maintain change of their own behaviour.
+ This phase was followed by further slots reminding people to
maintain any behavioural changes they had made, and showing images of
people enjoying the benefits of behavioural change.
TT 3 3Public health programmes
Community intervention programmes
Stanford Three Towns project
- 3 town this media intervention was targeted at a group of
individuals at particularly high risk of developing CHD and their
partners:
+ Received one-to-one education on risk behaviour change
and were asked to disseminate their knowledge through their social
networks
_ TT 7Public health programmes
Community intervention programmes
Stanford Three Towns project
The expected outcomes were found - by the end of the one-year
programme,
+ Scores on a measure of CHD-risk status based on factors
including blood pressure
+ Smoking and cholesterol level indicated that average risk scores
among the general population rose in the control town
+ Fell among the general population who received the media
campaign alone, and fell to an even more among those who lived in the
town that received the combined intervention.
_ TT 3Public health programmes
Community intervention programmes
Stanford Three Towns project
- After a further year, risk scores in the intervention towns were still
significantly lower than those of the control town, although because
scores in the media-only town continued to improve
+ Ultimately there was no difference between the scores of the
two intervention towns.
_ TT 3 6Public health programmes
Community intervention programmes
- European equivalent = 5-year programme in Finland, in addition to
media approach they also changed environmental factors
e.g. local meat manufacturers and butchers to promote low-fat
products, encouraging ‘no smoking’ restaurants, and so on.
- It was generally considered to be a success, with reductions in a
number of risk factors including blood pressure, cholesterol levels and
smoking among men. BUT findings were less significant, showing
reductions in risk factors were not consistently better than those in a
control area.
_ TT 7Public health programmes
Community intervention programmes
USA: The Minnesota Heart Health programme used the mass media to
promote awareness and to reinforce other educational approaches.
The programme had surprisingly little impact on health and health
behaviourPublic health programmes
Community intervention programmes
Five-year Heartbeat Wales programme
- Programme combined health education via the media with health
screening and environmental changes designed to promote
behavioural change.
- “Control areas’ received whatever was local health education
programmes being conducted at time.
- Food labelling, exercise trails, no smoking areas in restaurants etc.
TTT 3 5Public health programmes
Community intervention programmes
Five-year Heartbeat Wales programme:
- Food labelling, exercise trails, no smoking areas in restaurants etc
- Although levels of risk factors for CHD fell in Wales over the five-year
period of Heartbeat Wales, they did not fall any further than levels in
the control area
— this was due to a number of factors e.g food labelling
spreading out across whole of UK at the same time, media had an
ongoing conversation about CHD already etc.
_ TTPublic health programmes
Community intervention programmes
Level
Examples of interventions
Individual
Social
environment
- Establishing health-related messages through a range
of media and other channels;
- Making utensils necessary for healthy lifestyle
available: including salt spoons and oil pots;
- Providing free health screening and risk assessments
for cardiovascular disease;
- Providing fitness testing;
- Encouraging health professionals to screen for risk and
to provide (behavioural) prescriptions for health;
- Starting social exercise groups such as walking clubs;
- Encouraging dialogue between parents and children
promoting healthy lifestyle;
_—— 4 3Public health programmes
Level
Community intervention programmes
Examples of interventions
Physical
environment
Policy
environment
- Implementing smoke-free worksite environments;
- Instituting smoking bans in public areas;
- Using prompts to increase use of stairs and avoiding
escalators/lifts;
- Building walking trails with distance markers in easy
walking contexts
- Establishing a public bicycle service system;
- Providing healthy eating choices in restaurants and
workplace cafeteria;
- Making food content and calorie information available
to consumers in restaurants and other public eating
areas;
Smoke control regulation in public places
Engagement with the WHO healthy city movement 3Public health programmes
Reducing risk of HIV infection
- More successful interventions than CHD ones.
- Positive outcomes have been attributed to an approach called peer
education - used worldwide; opinion leaders and other key players
within specific communities are involved in projects and form a key
part of the programme.
- Draws upon social learning and diffusion theory.
_ 7 3Public health programmes
Reducing risk of HIV infection
- Using people known and respected within a particular community
makes their message salient and shows that appropriate change can be
achieved.
- This type of approach = crucial factor difference between HIV and
CHD interventions.
- Another difference = CHD being a developing over time thing, where
as HIV is a one time only situation.Public health programmes
Worksite public health
- Way of dealing with the problems from large-scale interventions =
target smaller, more easily accessible ‘controllable’ groups.
- One of these examples = public health programmes in workplace:
Majority conducted in USA perhaps because enhancing the health of
the workforce reduces the cost of workers’ health insurance, often paid
by the employer, and therefore benefits the company as well as the
individuals in it.
_ VV! 4Public health programmes
Worksite public health
One of these examples = public health programmes in workplace:
- Targeted a range of health problems e.g diet, exercise, smoking, stress,
using a variety of approaches:
+ Screening for risk factors for disease
+ Providing health education
+ Provision of healthy options, such as healthy food in eating
areas
+ Providing economic incentives for risk behaviour change
+ Manipulating social support to facilitate individual risk
behaviour change
+ Provision of no-smoking areas in the work environment
_ TTY 6Public health programmes
Worksite public health
Mujtaba and Cavico (2013): outlined a range of interventions that
have been applied in the workplace, categories ‘carrot’ or ‘stick’, carrots
included:
(i) providing gyms at work and/or free gym membership
(ii) providing low-fat meals in the cafeteria, or
(iii) making employer contributions to health insurance etc.
_ 4Public health programmes
Worksite public health
Mujtaba and Cavico (2013): Sticks include:
(i) higher health-care insurance premiums for unhealthy
employees,
(ii) increasing ‘deductibles’ for employees with unhealthy
lifestyles who fail to meet health-care standards, and
(iii) not hiring job applicants who are smokers, overweight or
otherwise unhealthy
_ TTY 9Public health programmes
School-based interventions
Perhaps the simplest intervention involves providing information on
the nutritional and calorific content of food provided in dining areas.
Providing free fruit/ veg = regular exposure increases consumption
and encourages a taste preference for fruit
Yc
Photo 7.3 Attractive healthy food served inthe workplace can increase healthy eating ratesPublic health programmes
School-based interventions
WHO health-promoting schools initiative:
- Schools should prioritise the health of their pupils and develop an
integrated approach to enhancing health, preventing uptake of
unhealthy behaviour and educating pupils about health-promoting
activities
- "Healthy policies”, such as a “no helmet, no bike at school” policy for
cycle safety or an Australian ‘no hat, no play’ policy (to avoid sunburn),
as well as more traditional policies such as no smoking on school
premises and no tolerance of bullying
_ TTSPublic health programmes
School-based interventions
WHO health-promoting schools initiative:
- Establishing a safe, healthy physical and social environment
- Teaching health-related skills
- Providing adequate health services within the school
- Providing healthy food
|| 3Public health programmes
School-based interventions
WHO health-promoting schools initiative:
- School-site health-promotion programmes for staff
- Availability of school counselling or psychology programmes
- Aschool physical education programme
S|Public health programmes
School-based interventions
- Only moderate success as too complex and limited uptake and
implementation in schools
- Effective sex education provides a powerful influence on sexual
behaviour.
- Countries where sex education is central to the curriculum, starts
early and focuses on the social as well as physical aspects of sexual
relations have lower unwanted pregnancy rates than countries where
the sex education is less central and starts later in the academic
curriculum - UK teaches it late in curriculum and not compulsory yet
has highest rate of unwanted teenage pregnancy
|S 3Public health programmes
School-based interventions
Peer education
- Training influential pupils in a school about a particular health issue
such as smoking, alcohol consumption or HIV education and
encouraging them to educate their peers about the issues, hopefully in
a way that encourages healthy behavior
|_| S 7Public health programmes
School-based interventions
Using new technology
- Internet based interventions
+ Pros: reach in terms of the number of people they can
potentially access and effectiveness, flexibility, accessible
- Texting
+ Pros: reminders, prompts and info for change, effective,
personalised
- BUT CONS: easy to ignore, relies on self help
| TPublic health programmes
School-based interventions
Using new technology
- Research focus:
+ Using facebook to enhance physical activity among young
women.
+ Participants allocated to 2 conditions: self-monitoring and
education, and self-monitoring and education plus membership of
facebook exercise support group.
+ Participants in both conditions significantly increased exercise
but no difference between both groups - was suggested that facebook
doesn’t offer the necessary levels of social support.
__ TT 6Summary
1. Risk factor screening may be of benefit to some individuals, but has
not consistently been found to reduce risk for disease. And it may
contribute to health anxieties
2. Motivational interviewing may be more beneficial in both motivating
and maintaining health behavior change, although its impact is not
guaranteed
3. Problem-focused approaches are significantly more effective than
those that simply provide health informationSummary
4. Screening for health risk can result in significant anxieties. For some
individuals, these may be alleviated by teaching simple coping
strategies
5. Simple media campaigns have proven of little benefit in achieving
behavioural change. Augmentation through refining communication
based on theories such as the elaboration likelihood model, combing
fear and fear reduction messages, appropriate information framing,
and audience segmentation may be of benefitSummary
6. Environmental interventions may also be of benefit. These may
provide cues to action or remove cues to unhealthy behaviour; enable
healthy behaviour by minimising the costs and barriers associated with
it; or maximise the costs of engaging in health-damaging behaviour.
7. Traditional CHD prevention programmes have achieved only modest
health gains in the population targeted unless aimed at relatively naive
populations.
8. Peer led interventions have proven more successful across a range of
behaviours.
9. The worksite offers a key environment to foster and facilitate health
behaviour change.
Ce )THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION !
60