Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BF00257653
BF00257653
Summary. "Cellulase" activity in a silt loam soil was The exact mechanism whereby microorganisms and
assayed and characterised using a microcrystalline cel- enzymes decompose cellulose is still the subject of
lulose substrate (Avicel). Activity was maximal be- some controversy (Burns 1982a) and the variety of
tween p H 5.3 and p H 6.0. A 64% loss in activity was names applied to the cellulolytic enzymes and their ac-
observed on air-drying the soil. However, the residual tivites have added to the confusion (Lee and Fan
activity was stable to storage at 40 °C for 7 days and 1980). In this paper we have confined our discussion
was resistant to the action of added protease. The to the activities of the enzymes endo-l,4-13-D-
component endoglucanase and ~-D-glucosidase ac- glucanase (EC 3.2.1.4), exo-l,4-[3-D-glucanase (cello-
tivities in field-moist and air-dried soil were also as- biohydrolase - EC 3.2.1.91) and [3-D-glucosidase
sayed. The proportion of the soil microbial popula- (EC 3.2.1.21) and we have used the term "cellulase"
tion able to utilise cellulose was investigated and the to refer to the combined action of these enzymes on
persistence of two free (soluble) cellulase preparations Avicel - a purified depolymerized alpha cellulose
of microbial origin was determined following their derived from fibrous plants.
addition to soil. A rapid decline in the endoglucanase A variety of methods and substrates have been
activity of a S t r e p t o m y c e s sp. cellulase preparation used for measuring cellulolytic activity in soils, e.g.
was observed while 30% of the original activity of a field measurements made on cotton strips or film
T r i c h o d e r m a viride cellulase preparation could still be (Latter and Howson 1977), measurement of carbon
detected after 20 days. From the data obtained in this dioxide evolved from labelled (Ibister et al. 1980) and
study it appears that the major portion of the ~-D- unlabelled (Sato 1981) cellulose, and release of reduc-
glucosidase activity is bound to and protected by the ing sugars from carboxymethyl cellulose (Pancholy
soil colloids. By contrast, the major portion of the and Rice 1973) and cellulose powder (Benefield 1971).
exo- and endoglucanase activity appears to be "free" Most of these studies have been concerned with deter-
in the soil solution, attached to the outer surfaces of mining the overall cellulase activity of the soil for
cellulolytic microorganisms or associated in enzyme comparative reasons. More recently, carboxymethyl
substrate complexes. The low residual activity mea- cellulose and cellulose powder have been used to
sured in air-dried soil may owe its stability to an asso- study the properties and location of the cellulase com-
ciation with soil colloids or with recalcitrant cellulosic plex in a tomato field soil (Hayano 1986).
material present in soil. In this study we have attempted to assay and to
characterise (in terms of pH-activity profile, thermo-
Key words: Soil cellulase - Enzyme characterisation stability, etc.) the total cellulase as well as the com-
- ~-D-Glucosidase - Endo-
T r i c h o d e r m a viride - ponent endoglucanase and [3-D-glucosidase activities
glucanase in a silt loam soil. This, together with a study of the
cellulolytic microbial population present in the soil
* Present address: Department of Microbiology, University of Sur- permits us to provide a detailed description of these
rey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 5XH, UK enzyme activities and to speculate as to their location
Offprint requests to: R. G. Burns in the bulk soil (Burns 1982b).
165
Materials and methods fers other than sodium acetate were used to investigate pH-activity
profiles) the humic matter was precipitated by the sequential addi-
Soil A silt loam soil (Hamble Series: Soil Survey Record No. 14) tions of 100 Ixl 1.2 M-lead acetate [(CH3COO)2Pb3H20 ] and 100 ~tl
with the following characteristics was used: p H 6.4, sand 9o70, silt 1.2 M-potassium oxalate [(COOK)2H20 ] .
72%, clay 19%, organic matter 6% (determined by ignition of The stability of glucose produced during the course of the assay
oven-dried soil); CEC 14.8 cmol kg -1 (Lethbridge and Burns was examined by performing an "assay" in which Avicel was re-
1976). The level of residual carbohydrate present in the soil at the placed by glucose (0.05 - 0.5 re_M). Reducing sugars and glucose in
time of collection was 7.8 mg (g soil)-1 (measured as glucose equiv- the supernatants were measured immediately after addition, after
alents following hydrolysis with 1.5 M H z S O 4 according to Brink et 16h incubation at 40°C, and following lead acetate/potassium
al. (1960). Enzyme activity was measured both in freshly collected oxalate treatment. Glucose added directly to soil was recovered
and air-dried soil. Where it was impossible to perform assays quantitatively (100% + 9%) after 16 h incubation, indicating that
immediately, fresh soil was stored for short periods (<48 h) in under the conditions of the assay (in the presence of 0.2% (w/v)
sealed plastic containers at 4 °C. Alternatively, air-dried soil (72 h, NaN 3 to prevent microbial proliferation) glucose was not utilized
22 °C) was hand crumbled and sieved through 2-mm mesh prior to by soil microorganisms, adsorbed to soil colloid, or oxidised to any
storage in dark-glass bottles at room temperature (22 o+ 3 °C). significant extent by indigenous soil glucose isomerase (Ross 1974).
However, following precipitation of extracted humic material, only
80% ___5% of the added glucose could be detected. This 20°70 + 5%
Viable counts o f soil microorganisms. Triplicate samples of flesh
loss was probably due to coflocculation of glucose with humic acids
soil (1 g) were suspended in 100 ml sterile buffer (7 g NazHPO4, 3 g
and a compensation factor (xl.25) was introduced for assays in
KHzPO4,5 g NaC1, 1-1). The flasks were shaken on a rotary shaker
which this treatment was used.
(150 rpm) for 1 h at 30°C to dislodge microorganisms from the soil
particles and a tenfold dilution series in buffer prepared. Three 0.1-
ml aliquots of three consecutive dilutions were spread onto agar Endoglucanase. Endoglucanase activity (EC 3.2.1.4) was measured
plates and the plates incubated at 25 °C for 7 days. Total bacterial using a soil to buffer ratio of 1 • 5 and 1%0 (w/v) CMC 7L (Hercules
counts were made on nutrient agar plates whilst cellulolytic bacteria Inc., Wilmington, Del. USA) as the substrate. Samples were in-
were counted on plates containing Avicel PH105 (Honeywill and cubated unders shaking conditions for 16h at 40°C. Reducing
Stein, Wallington, UK). The Avicel plates were prepared by over- sugars in the supernatant following centrifugation (2500xg,
laying a defined minimal medium, pH 7.5 (Berg et ai. 1972a) con- 10 min) were determined using dinitrosalicylic acid reagent - DNS
taining 1% w/v purified agar (Oxoid), with 10 ml of the same (Miller et al. 1960).
medium to which 1% w/v Avicel had been added. The total num:
ber of fungal colonies was counted on malt extract agar plates and fl-D-Glucosidase. 13-D-Glucosidase activity was measured by mix-
cellulolytic fungi on Avicel plates prepared in the same manner as ing 0.2 g air-dried soil with 1.5 ml 0.1 M-acetate buffer, pH 5.5,
the bacterial plates but using a minimal medium, p H 4.6 (Stern- and 1.0ml 25 mM-p-nitrophenyl-13-D-glucopyranoside (pNPG).
berg, 1976). In order to prevent the growth of any bacterial colonies Controls without p N P G we also prepared. After incubation (4 h,
on the fungai plates, filter-sterilized streptomycin sulphate (400 ~tg 307C), 0.5 ml of 0.5 M CaC12 was added to each bottle and I ml
ml - l ) was added to the partially cooled (ca. 45°C) autoclaved p N P G was added to the controls. The reaction was terminated by
media. addition of 2 ml 0.5 M Tris, pH 10.5, and the mixtures centrifuged
(2500x g, 10 min). The supernatants were then diluted as appropri-
Cellulase assay. Combined exoglucanase (EC 3.2.1.91), endoglu- ate and the absorbance at 400 nm determined. The absorbance
canase (EC 3.2.1.4), and 13-D-glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.21) activity - readings were related to p N P concentrations by means of a stan-
hereafter collectively referred to as "cellulase" - was measured by dard curve.
placing 1 g soil in a 25 ml Erlenmeyer flask and adding 5 ml 0.1 M
acetate buffer, pH 5.5, containing 0.2070 (w/v) sodium azide, as a Characterization o f enzyme activities. The thermal stability of
bacteriostatic agent. Washed Avicel (0.5 g) was added, the flask the soil cellulase activity was determined by bringing air-dried soil
sealed and incubated at 40°C for 16 h in a shaking water bath. In to ca. 85%0 W H C [0.5 ml 1-120 containing 0.2% (w/v) NaN 3
the control Avicel was added at the end of the incubation period (g soil)- 1] and storing the samples in 25 ml Erlenmeyer flasks at
and the reaction stopped by centrifugation (2500xg, 10 min). Each 25 °C or 40°C for up to 14 days.
supernatant was assayed in duplicate for reducing sugars and/or The resistance of the soil cellulase activity to proteolytic attack
glucose so that the levels o f product glucose and cellobiose could be by a nonspecific protease (Sigma type VI) was determined. Com-
calculated. Reducing sugars were determined using the Nelson- parison was made with a Trichoclerma viride commericai cellulase
Somogyi copper reduction method (Spiro 1966) and glucose by a (BDH) subjected to the same treatment. Soil samples (1 g) at 85%
modified glucose oxidase method (Pycraft and Howarth 1980). In water-holding capacity (0.5 ml 0.1 M Tris/HC1 buffer, pH 7.0,
both methods the absorbance readings were related to glucose con- containing 0.2% NaN 3 and 3 mg ml-1 protease) were maintained at
centration by means of a standard curve (0.05 - 0.4 mM) which was 25 °C. Because the added protease was found to be gradually in-
prepared each day. In the Nelson-Somogyi assay, the time that the activated in the soil samples, two additional amendments were
samples were kept in the 100 °C water bath prior to the addition of made (1.5 mg protease after 24 h and 67 h) in order to maintain a
the arsenomolybdate reagent was set at 20 rain since this was the high level of diffusible (free) protease activity. The presence of dif-
boiling time required for a standard solution (0.25 mM) of cel- fusible protease activity was confirmed, during and at the comple-
lobiose to give the same absorbance reading as a standard glucose tion of the experiment, using the method of Burns et al. (1972).
solution (0.25 mM) assayed under identical conditions. Three Trichoderma viride cellulase (1 mg m1-1 , prepared in 0.1M-
replica treatments and three controls were used for each assay. A Tris/HCl pH 7.0, containing 0.2 % NaN 3 ) was subjected to 0.1 and
glucose standard curve was constructed at each pH since the redox 1.0mg m1-1 protease (equivalent to ca. 16% and 138% of the
potential of the sugars is pH dependent. calculated average diffusible (free) protease activity measured in
In assays where humic matter was extracted into the super- the treated soil samples). Cellulase activity in the protease-treated
natant and interferred with the colorimetric assay (e.g. when buf- and untreated soils was assayed in the usual manner except that
166
4.5 ml 0.1 M-acetate buffer was used. The m e t h o d used to assay the Table 1. Viable counts of microorganisms in Hamble soil [numbers
protease-treated and untreated Trichoderma cellulase preparations (g dry wt. soil)- 1 and standard deviation (o n_ 1)]
was the same as that used for soil except that 1 g soil was replaced
with 1 ml enzyme preparation and the a m o u n t of buffer reduced Medium Counts (cfu x l 0 - 5)
from 5 ml to 4 ml.
The persistence (resistance to degradation by native soil pro- Bacterial Nutrient agar 378 _+51
teolytic enyzmes or due to adsorption without inactivation to soil Avicel/Berg M M 70 _+16
colloids) of the endoglucanase c o m p o n e n t of Trichoderma viride Fungal Malt extract agar 8.1 _+4.1
commercial cellulase and a cell-free cellulase preparation from a Avicel/Sternberg M M 7.2 ___3.9
Streptomyces sp. soil isolate (Hope and Burns 1985) was deter-
mined by adding aliquots (0.2 ml) of cellulase preparation (1 mg
m1-1 in 0.1M-acetate buffer, p H 5.5, containing 0.2% (w/v)
N a N 3) to 0.4 g air-dried soil. The enzyme-treated soil and an un- 100
treated control were incubated at 25 °C and assayed for endoglu-
canase activity at intervals using the usual endoglucanase assay ex-
8O
cept that the incubation period was reduced to 30 min and the DNS
reagent added directly to the soil slurry.
60
0-02 0"05
i
0"10
i
0"15
i
0.20
plates (Table 1), 7 × 106 or ca. 20% of the soil bacteria Avicet Concentration (g rnl"q)
were able to utilize Avicel as their sole carbon source. Fig. 1. Effect of substrate (Avicel)concentration on cellulaseactivi-
However, only a small proportion (ca. 0.2%) of the ty [nmol reducing sugars as glucose equivalents (g dry wt. soil)-1
cellulolytic bacteria produced clearing zones on the h -1] in field moist soil (26O7owater content) and soil: buffer ratios
Avicel plates (indicative of extensive hydrolysis and of o; 1:2; and A; 1:5
unequivocal evidence of their use of the substrate). A
large number (ca. 80%) of the cellulolytic bacteria fungal colonies the dense sporulating mycelium made
were actinomycetes. Reports in the literature on the
it impossible to see any clearing zones. Furthermore,
cellulase system of the actinomycetes (Crawford and
a comparable study made using a Trichoderma viride
Sutherland 1979; Hagerdal et al. 1980; Ishaque and
isolated from soil indicated that the radial growth rate
Kluepfel 1980) suggest that these organisms possess a
of the fungal colony on CMC agar plates was almost
cellulase system more akin to that of the fungi than
twice that of the rate of diffusion of endoglucanase,
the bacteria in that their cellulases are secreted to the
thereby masking any visual signs of hydrolysis (Hope
surrounding medium. One factor limiting the growth
and Burns 1985). Therefore, even if the advancing
of bacteria other than the actinomycetes on solid
fungal hyphae were producing endoglucanase one
media containing Avicel is that, in order to utilize this
would not expect to see a zone of clearing advancing
particular substrate, microorganisms may need to ahead of the colony perimeter. This illustrates the im-
align themselves along the cellulose fibril. Evidence portance, when screening fungi for cellulase produc-
for this view comes from electron microscope studies tion by the zone method, of either making an allow-
of bacterial configuration (Berg et al. 1972b) and ex- ance for the rate of radial growth or else limiting
periments which indicate that many bacterial species colony size by incorporating an agent such as rose
retain some of their cellulases at the outer membrane bengal into the medium (Montenecourt and Eveleigh
rather than secreting them to the surrounding medium 1977).
(Ramasamy and Verachtert 1980). Therefore bacteria
may have difficulty in growing on Avicel plates
because the microcrystalline cellulose particles are in-
Soil cellulase activity
corporated in the agar and many are not directly ac- When soil was incubated with the substrate Avicel
cessible as carbon and energy sources. (0.1 g m l - t) the rate of release of reducing sugars was
Fungal counts on Avicel plates were not signifi- constant for the first 24 h after which it declined.
cantly different from those on malt extract agar plates Figure 1 shows the effect of different substrate con-
(Table 1). Unlike the bacterial Avicel plates, where a centrations (0.002 - 0.2 g ml - i) on cellulase activity at
small number of distict zones of clearing were 25 °C for two different soil to buffer ratios. Substrate
observed, clearing zones were not seen at all on the saturation kinetics were not observed. Increasing the
fungal Avicel plates. However, with many of the amount of Avicel relative to the amount of soil either
167
Drozdowicz A (1971) The behavior of cellulase in soil. Rev Micro- Pancholy SK, Rice EL (1973) Soil enzymes in relation to oldfield
biol 2:17 - 23 succession: amylase, cellulase, invertase, dehydrogenase and
Enari T-M, Markkanen P (1977) Production of cellulolytic enzymes urease. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 37:47-50
by fungi. Adv Biochem Eng 5 : 3 - 22 Pettit NM, Gregory LJ, Freedman RB, Burns RG (1977) Differen-
Goksoyr J, Eidsa G, Eriksen J, Osmundsvag K (1975) A com- tial stabilities of soil enzymes: assay and properties of phospha-
parison of cellulases form different microorganisms. In: Bailey tase and arylsulphatase. Biochim Biophys Acta 485:357- 366
M, Enari T-M, Linko M (eds) Symposium on the enzymatic Pycraft CJH, Howarth P (1980) A method for measuring enzymic
hydrolysis of cellulose. Sirra, Helsinki, pp 217-230 degradation of cellulose fibres. Pap Technol Ind 21:283 - 285
Hagerdal B, Ferchak JD, Pye EK (1980) Saccharification of cel- Ramasamy K, Verachtert H (1980) Localization of cellulase compo-
lulose by the cellulolytic enzyme system of Thermonospora sp. I. nents in Pseudomonas sp isolated from activated sludge. J Gen
Stability of cellulolytic activities with respect to time, tempera- Microbiol 117:181 - 191
ture and pH. Biotechnol Bioeng 22:1515 - 1526 Reese ET (1963) Advances in the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose
Hayano K (1986) Cellulase complex in a tomato field soil: induc- and related materials. Pergamon Press, Oxford
tion, localization and some properties. Soil Biol Biochem Ross DJ (1974) Glucose oxidase activity in soil and its possible
18:215 - 2 1 9 interference in assays of cellulase activity. Soil Biol Biochem
Hope CFA, Burns RG (1985) The barrier-ring plate technique for 6:303 - 306
studying extracellular enzyme diffusion and microbial growth in Ross D J, Speir TW (1979) Studies on a climosequence of soils in
model soil environments. J Gen Microbiol 131:1237- 1243 tussock grasslands 23, Cellulases and hemicellulase activies of
Ibister JD, Shippen RS, Caplan J (1980) A new method for measur- topsoils and tussock plant materials. NZ J Sci 22:25- 33
ing cellulose and starch degradation in soils. Bull Environ Rowland SP (1975) Selected aspects of the structure and accessibili-
Contain Toxicol 24:570-574 ty of cellulose as they relate to hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng
Ishaque M, Kluepfel D (1980) Cellulase complex of a mesophilic Symp 5:183 - 191
Streptomyces strain. Can J Microbiol 26:183-189 Sarkar JM (1986) Formation of [14C]cellulase-humic complexes and
Latter PM, Howson G (1977) The use of cotton strips to indicate their stability in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 18:251 - 2 5 4
cellulose decomposition in the field. Pedobiologia 17:145- 155 Sato K (1981) Relations between soil microflora and CO2 evolution
Lee Y-H, Fan LT (1980) Properties and mode of action of cellulase. upon decomposition of cellulose. Plant Soil 61:251 - 258
Adv Biochem Eng 17:101 - 129 Speir TW, Ross DJ (1981) A comparison of the effects of air-drying
Lethbridge G, Bull AT, Burns RG (1978) Assay and properties of and acetone dehydration on soil enzyme activities. Soil Biol Bio-
1,3-13-glucanase in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 10:389-391 chem 13:225 - 229
Lethbridge G, Burns RG (1976) Inhibition of soil urease by organo- Spiro RG (1966) Analysis of sugars found in glycoproteins. In:
phosphorus insecticides. Soil Biol Biochem 8:99- 102 Neufeld EF, Ginsberg V (eds) Methods in enzymology, vol 8.
McLaren AD, Skujins J (1968) The physical environment of micro- Academic Press, London, pp 3 - 26
organisms in soil. In: Gray TRG, Parkinson D (eds) The ecology Sternberg D (1976) Production of cellulase by Trichoderma. Bio-
of soil bacteria. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool, pp 3 - 2 4 technol Bioeng Symp 6:35- 53
Miller GL, Blum R, Glennon WE, Burton AL (1960) Measurement Williams ST, Robinson CS (1981) The role of streptomycetes in de-
of carboxymethylcellulase activity. Anal Biochem 1:127-132 composition of chitin in acidic soils. J Gen Microbio1127:55 - 63
Montenecourt BS, Eveleigh DE (1977) Semiquantitative plate assay Wood TM, McCrae SI, MacFarlane CC (1980) The isolation,
for determination of cellulase production by Trichoderma viride. purification and properties of the cellobiohydrolase component
Appl Environ Microbiol 33:178-183 of Penicillium funiculosum cellulase. Biochem J 189:51 - 65
Nannipieri P, Ceccanti B, Conti C, Bianchi D (1982) Hydrolases ex-
tracted from soil: their properties and activities. Soil Biol Bio-
chem 14:257-263 Received September 29, 1986