Name of Employe: MARY JOY E. DE LA BANDA Name of Rater: CECELIA C.

BELLOGA
Position: TEACHER I Position: MT-I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPED SOUTH COTABATO Date of Review: FEB 6-10, 2023
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 21% 1. Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Knowledge knowledge of (COT) rating sheets or Inter-
Services and Pedagogy content within and observer agreement forms done
across curriculum through on-site/ face-to-face/ in-
teaching areas. person classroom observation.

If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
classes are not implemented, Efficiency
• through observation of
synchronous/asynchronous
teaching in other modalities; or

• through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via LAC Timeliness
session.

2. Used a range of 1. Classroom Observation Tool Quality

teaching strategies (COT) rating sheets or Inter-
that enhance observer agreement forms done
learner through on-site/ face-to-face/ in-
achievement in person classroom observation.
literacy and
numeracy skills. If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
classes are not implemented, Efficiency

• through observation of
synchronous/asynchronous
teaching in other modalities; or

• through observation of a Timeliness

demonstration teaching* via LAC
session.
 Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
3. Applied a range 1. Classroom Observation Tool Quality
of teaching (COT) rating sheets or Inter-
strategies to observer agreement forms done
develop critical and through on-site/ face-to-face/ in-
creative thinking, as person classroom observation.
well as other higher-
order thinking skills. If onsite/face-to-face/in-person Efficiency
classes are not implemented,

• through observation of
synchronous/asynchronous
teaching in other modalities; or
Timeliness
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via LAC
session.
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 21% 1. Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Environment classroom structure (COT) rating sheets or Inter-
Services and Diversity to engage learners, observer agreement forms done
of Learners individually or in through on-site/ face-to-face/ in-
groups, in person classroom observation.
meaningful
exploration, If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
discovery and classes are not implemented,
hands-on activities Efficiency
• through observation of
within a range of
synchronous/asynchronous
physical learning
teaching in other modalities; or
environments.
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via LAC Timeliness
session.

5. Managed learner 1. Classroom Observation Tool Quality

behavior (COT) rating sheets or Inter-
constructively by observer agreement forms done
applying positive through on-site/ face-to-face/ in-
and non-violent person classroom observation.
discipline to ensure Efficiency
learning-focused If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
environments. classes are not implemented,
 Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
• through observation of Timeliness
synchronous/asynchronous
teaching in other modalities; or

• through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via LAC
session.

6. Used 1. Classroom Observation Tool Quality

differentiated, (COT) rating sheets or Inter-
developmentally observer agreement forms done
appropriate learning through on-site/ face-to-face/ in-
experiences to person classroom observation.
address learners’
gender, needs, If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
strengths, interests classes are not implemented,
and experiences. Efficiency
• through observation of
synchronous/asynchronous
teaching in other modalities; or Timeliness

• through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via LAC
session.

Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, 21% 1. Classroom Observation Tool Quality

Education and Planning managed and (COT) rating sheets or Inter-
Services implemented observer agreement forms done
developmentally through on-site/ face-to-face/ in-
sequenced teaching person classroom observation.
and learning
If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
processes to meet
classes are not implemented,
curriculum
requirements and • through observation of Efficiency
varied teaching synchronous/asynchronous
contexts. teaching in other modalities; or

• though observation of a
demonstration teaching* via LAC
 Timeliness

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
8. Participated in 1. Proof/s of attendance in LAC Quality
collegial sessions/ FGDs/ meetings/ other
discussions that use collegial discussions
teacher and learner 2. Minutes of LAC sessions/
feedback to enrich FGDs/ meetings/ other collegial
teaching practice. discussions on use of teacher and
learner feedback to enrich
teaching practice
3. Reflection notes of teachers on
their demonstration of teaching
practices following participation Efficiency
from LAC sessions/ FGDs/
meetings/ other collegial
discussions that use teacher and Timeliness
learner feedback to enrich
teaching practice, with proofs of
attendance
4. Any equivalent ALS
form/document that highlights the
objective

9. Selected, 1. Classroom Observation Tool Quality

developed, (COT) rating sheets or Inter-
organized and used observer agreement forms done
appropriate through on-site/ face-to-face/ in-
teaching and person classroom observation.
learning resources,
including ICT, to If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
address learning classes are not implemented,
goals. Efficiency
• through observation of
synchronous/asynchronous
teaching in other modalities; or

• though observation of a
demonstration teaching* via LAC

Timeliness
 Weight
Timelin Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives per Means of Verification
e Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 4. Assessment 10. Designed, selected, 21% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Education and Reporting organized and used Tool (COT) rating sheets or
Services diagnostic, formative Inter-observer agreement
and summative forms done through on-site/
assessment strategies face-to-face/ in-person
consistent with classroom observation.
curriculum
requirements. If onsite/face-to-face/in-
person classes are not Efficiency
implemented,

• through observation of
synchronous/asynchronous
teaching in other modalities;
or
Timeliness
• though observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC
11. Monitored and Any one (1) of the Quality
evaluated learner following:
progress and
achievement using • Individual Learning
learner attainment data. Monitoring Plan (ILMP)

• Peer assessment data

• Sample of learners’ outputs

with reflection/ self-
assessment
Efficiency
• Progress charts/ anecdotal
records Timeliness

• Class/ e-class record/

grading sheets

• Lesson plans showing index

of mastery
 • Frequency of errors with
identified least/most
mastered skills

• Any equivalent ALS form/

document that highlights the

Weight Mid-year Review Rating

Timelin Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives per Means of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
e Performance Review
KRA Remark
Target Rating Rating Remarks Results
s
objective (e.g. Individual
Learning Agreement (ILA),
ALS Assessment Form 2)

• Others (please specify and

provide annotation)

12. Communicated Any one (1) of the Quality

promptly and clearly the following:
learners’ needs,
progress and • A sample of corrected test
achievement to key paper of a learner in a
stakeholders, including learning area with parent’s or
parents/guardians. guardian’s signature and date
of receipt

• Minutes of meetings with

key stakeholders (e.g. PTA,
SGC, SPT, CPC) with proof
of attendance

• Report card with parent’s or

guardian’s signature in all
quarters supported by
minutes of meeting Efficiency

• Communication with key Timeliness

stakeholders (e.g.
parents/guardians, co-
teachers, LGU) using various
modalities

• Anecdotal records showing

entries per quarter
 • Any equivalent ALS form/
document that highlights the
objective (e.g. Individual
Learning Agreement (ILA),
ALS Assessment Form 2)

• Other documents showing

learners’ needs, progress
and achievement submitted
to other stakeholders

Mid-year Review Rating

Weight Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
per KRA Performance Review
Remark
Target Rating Rating Remarks Results
s
Basic 5. Personal 13. Applied a 14% A reflection/ journal entry Quality
Education Growth and personal that highlights the application
Services Professional philosophy of of a learner-centered teaching Efficiency
Development teaching that is philosophy in the lesson plan
learner-centered. or community work. Timeliness
14. Set 1. Certification from the ICT Quality
professional Coordinator/ School Head/
development Focal Person in charge of
goals based on e-SAT
the Philippine 2. IPCRF-DP Efficiency
Professional 3. Midyear Review Form
Standards for (MRF)
Teachers. 4. Updated IPCRF-DP Phase Timeliness
II

Basic Plus Factor 15. Performed 2% Any one (1) proof of: Quality
Education various related
Services works/ activities • Committee involvement
that contribute to
• Involvement as module/
the teaching-
learning material writer/
learning process.
validator

• Involvement as a resource
person/ speaker/ learning
facilitator in the RO/ SDO/
school-initiated TV/Radio-
based instruction
 • Book or journal authorship/ Efficiency
co-authorship/ contributorship

• Advisorship/ coordinatorship/
chairpersonship

Mid-year Review Rating

Weight Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
per KRA Performance Review
Remark
Target Rating Rating Remarks Results
s
• Participation in
demonstration teaching Timeliness

• Participation as research
presenter in a forum/
conference

• Mentoring of pre-service/ in-

service teachers

• Conducted research within

the rating period

with annotation on how it

contributed to the teaching-
learning process.

CECELIA C. BELLOGA MARY JOY E. DE LA BANDA PETRONILO B. REYES, JR.

Rater Ratee Approving Authority