economics? When attempting to gain an understanding of an incredibly complicated situation, economists often try to simplify the situation by removing unnecessary and distracting things to make the world “workable”. When this is done we end up with ‘a model’: something that is not “real” and it often looks like a ridiculous description - but it may allow us to make some truthful conclusions. You have already looked at a model earlier in these notes. It might be a good idea to just recap this with your teacher so you are clear about the idea of a model..
Production Possibility Model
Consider a hypothetical economy with the following simplifying assumptions (i.e it is a “model”):- 1. it can devote its scarce resources to the production of either of two goods only: Necessities or Luxuries; 2. all of its resources are fully employed being used to their highest productivity (efficiency); 3. all of its resources are in fixed supply (i.e we can’t have more resources being discovered or brought into the economy); 4. the level of technology remains constant.
Below is a table with a number of possible combinations of
these commodities that can be produced depending on how resources are divided or allocated between the production of each commodity:-
Product (units Combination or possible Resource
per year) Allocation A B C D E F Necessities 15 14 12 9 5 0 Luxuries 0 1 2 3 4 5
Consider the table:-
if all resources are devoted to the production of luxuries
there is a maximum amount of luxuries that can be produced per year: 5 Luxuries; if all resources are devoted to the production of necessities, there is a maximum amount of necessities that can be produced per year: 15 units of Necessities. this society can “transform” luxuries into necessities - not “physically” but by diverting resources away from the production of luxuries toward the production of necessities. We can use the table above to calculate the “opportunity cost” of producing each commodity. Imagine that the society is producing at combination B. At this combination it is producing 1 unit of Luxuries and 14 units of Necessities. Imagine that it wants to produce 2 units of Luxuries. To do this it will have to reallocate its resources to Combination C because its resources are fully employed at present. At this point it can only produce 12 units of Necessities. To produce the extra unit of Luxuries it has had to give up 2 units of Necessities. Therefore the opportunity cost of 1 unit of Luxuries is 2 units of Necessities. The table can be represented in graphical form as follows….
This is a Production Possibility Curve. It
diagrammatically illustrates the opportunity cost involved in producing each commodity:- [refer to “PPF1” ] Note the way that the PPF slopes downward to reflect the fact that you ‘give up’ one commodity to get more of the other Consider a move from resource allocation F to allocation D. This causes a rise in military production by 9 units and a fall in civilian production by 2 units. So the opportunity cost of producing the first 9 units of necessities is 2 units of luxuries. Note the way that the PPF is concave. This represents increasing opportunity cost – listen carefully as your teacher explains why … Sometimes PPF are linear (your teacher may illustrate) this shows constant opportunity cost (see Figure 1.2 on page 17) It’s a production possibility frontier because it is a “limit” of production. All points on the frontier are possible combinations of production assuming all resources are being employed. We can produce at point U - within the frontier (see figure 1.1 on page 16 also) - but this means that we are not fully employing our resources. If we were to move from U to certain points on the PPF (your teacher will show you) we can gain without any opportunity cost! We can’t produce at point X because we simply don’t have the resources to allow this. If people were so confident that they demanded as much as Point X indicates then this is likely to result in inflation. It is impossible to say which is “the best” point on the PPF because this depends on the tastes and preferences of the society. Imagine a PPF of a country that produces either capital goods or consumption goods. As we have stated previously, if we produce capital goods we cannot presently consume (that’s the opportunity cost!). However “capital accumulation” means that, in the future our resources can be used to produce more goods and services. What do you think this will do to our production possibility curve?
Let’s look at the documents “PPF2” and “PPF3” and see if
you can understand the implications of the information they have given you to help understand the PPFs.
Let us consolidate the PPF questions by reading the Section
of your textbook about PPFs, then attempting test your understanding 1.9. Then some exercises that your teacher will give you access to.
Firstly, just peruse this additional PowerPoint example for