2023 - 2024

2n
d

Se
m
(F
ir
st
Q
ua

DENNMARK D.
IGUT

MendelBryant 2016 1
I. ACCESS
A. Lowest Percentage of Monthly Attend
Enrolment % Monthly Attendance
Grade and Section SY 2023-
2024 NOV. DEC. JAN. Ave.

Reasons for Absences:

Interventions/Actions Taken:

B. Number of Learners who are Frequently Late

Enrolment SY No. of Learners who are Frequently Late
Grade and Section
2023-2024 Nov. Dec. Jan. Ave.

Reasons for frequently late:

None

Interventions/Actions Taken:

None

Enrolment SY No. of Learners who always cut classes

Grade and Section
2023-2024 Nov. Dec. Jan. Ave.

Reasons for cutting classes:

MendelBryant 2016 2
 None

Interventions/Actions Taken:

None

C. Number of Learners who always cut classes

D. No. of Learners NO Longer in School (NLS)

Enrolment SY No. of NLS Learners
Grade and Section
2023-2024 Nov. Dec. Jan. Ave.

Reasons for NLS:

None

Interventions/Actions Taken:

None

H. Textbook/ Learning Material (LM)

Classes Handled No. of Number of Learners Provided
Students with Learning Resources
11 – Dolphin - GAS (Contemporary 20 20
Philippine Arts From the Regions)
11 – Dolphin - HE (Contemporary Philippine 8 8
Arts From the Regions)
11 – Sturgeon - STEM (Contemporary 43 43
Philippine Arts From the Regions)
11 – Dolphin - HUMMS (Contemporary 55 55
Philippine Arts From the Regions)

MendelBryant 2016 3
 II. QUALITY
A. Curriculum Coverage
Number of Competency %
Subjects Handled To be Covered
Covered (Actual)
(Target)
(Contemporary Philippine Arts
8 8 100%
From the Regions)

Most Learned Competency/ies Least Learned Competency/ies

 Describes various contemporary art forms and Relates the significance of arts
their practices from the various regions. forms from the regions
(CAR11/12IAC-0a-1) (CAR11/12CAP-0c -e-8)

B. Student Mastery of Competencies

1. Learners’ Achievement in Quarterly Test
Mean
Grade and Percentage % Gain Issues/
Interventions/
Subject Score (MPS) or Loss Challenges/
Section Concerns
Action Taken
Previous Current
CPAR 11 – Dolphin Most of the Remediation
(GAS) 70.5% students failed
during the exam
CPAR 11 – Dolphin (HE) because as one of
57.2% reasons they were
not able to study
CPAR 11 – Sturgeon
well.
(STEM) 78.2%

MendelBryant 2016 4
CPAR 11 – Shark
(HUMMS) 53.4%

2. Failure Rate (Based on Form 138)

No. of Number of Percentage of learners with
Grade and
Subject Students learners with failing grade
Section failing grade
CPAR 11 – Dolphin 20 0 0%
(GAS)
CPAR 11 – Dolphin (HE) 8 0 0%
CPAR 11 – Sturgeon 43 0 0%
(STEM)
CPAR 11 – Shark 55 1 1.7%
(HUMMS)

Common Reasons for Failure:

Some of the students were not able to perform their performances and failed during exam.
Interventions/Actions Taken:

The teacher has follow-up them but they will not participate.

3. Number of Learners per Grade Range by subject and by Grade level based on the School
Consolidated Grade Sheets for the 2nd SEM (First Quarter) Period
Did not
Outstand Very meet
Fairly At risk of
GRADE AND ing Outstanding Outstanding Satisfact Satisfactory Expectatio TOTA
SUBJECT SECTION (98- (95-97) (90-94) ory (80-84)
Satisfactory n Failing in the
( 75-79) next Quarter L
100) (85-89) (Below
75)
CPAR 11 – Dolphin
0 5 4 7 4 0 0 0 20
(GAS)

CPAR 11 – Dolphin (HE)

0 0 2 2 1 3 0 0 8
CPAR 11 – Sturgeon
0 5 17 10 7 4 0 0 43
MendelBryant 2016 5
 (STEM)

CPAR 11 – Shark
0 3 7 16 21 7 1 0 55
(HUMMS)

4. Average Computed Grades for the Quarter (Grade Sheet/Form 138)

No. of Average Computed
Subject Grade and Section
Students Grades for the Quarter
CPAR 11 – Dolphin (GAS) 20 88.3%

CPAR 11 – Dolphin (Home Economics) 8 85.07%

CPAR 11 – Sturgeon (STEM) 43 90.25%

CPAR 11 – Shark (HUMMS) 55 83.11%

Concerns, Issues, Gaps, Problems (CIGPs)

CIGPs Actions Taken Proposed Resolution
None

4. Numeracy of Classes Handled

Highly Nearly
Grade and Proficient Low Proficient Non-Proficient
Proficient Proficient
Section M F M F M F M F M F

MendelBryant 2016 6
 Issues/Challenges/Concerns

Interventions/Actions Taken

Proposed Recommendations to Address Issues:

III. GOVERNANCE
A. Capability Buildings (CBs) Attended
Number of
Title of the Training/INSET/LAC
CBs attended
 Positive Discipline
School LAC Sessions
2  School Based LAC
INSET related:
Content and Pedagogy
Assessment
Contextualization of LRs
Learning Delivery
Program/System Implementation
Other Trainings (Specify below)

MendelBryant 2016 7
 B. Special Assignments
1. Ancillary Services (Related to Guidance. Canteen, Library, Clinic, School Records,
ICT/Computer, DRRM, Subject Coordinator, and the like)
ANCILLARY SERVICES
None

2. Special Programs/Projects (ALS/Abot-Alam, IPED, Madrasah/ALIVE, MISOSA, Open

HS/EASE/ e- IMPACT, DORP, ECARP, Foreign Language)
SPECIAL PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
None

What activities did you conduct in your programs/projects?

ACCOMPLISHMENTS
PHYSICAL FINANCIAL
None None

C. Professional Development
1. Learning Area/ Subject Expertise/Weakness
1. Educational Qualifications
Subject Handling Major Minor Non-Major /Non-Minor

Contemporary Philippine Arts

✓
From the Regions

MendelBryant 2016 8
1. Bachelor’s Degree (with DPE) Bachelor of Secondary Education
2. Major/Minor MAPEH
3. Masteral Degree/Major
4. No. of Units/CAR/Graduated
5. Doctoral/PhD Degree/Major
6. No. of Units/CAR/Graduated
7. No. of Years of Public Teaching Experience 5 years and 3 months
8. Conducted Action Research?
9. Designed a Teaching Innovation?
10. Served as demonstrator?
11. Served as training facilitator, trainer, resource speaker?
12. Position/Designation Teacher II

MendelBryant 2016 9
Promptness in Accomplishing/ Submitting School Forms
How prompt are you in accomplishing and/or submitting the following school forms/ documents/ reports
(earlier, on time, late)?
 Teacher’s M&E Report On Time
 School Form 1 On Time
 School Form 2 On Time
 School Form 9 On Time
 Lesson Plan On Time
 Quarterly Assessment Matrix with Quarterly Assessment Items On Time
 LIS On Time
 Class Record/ Grade Sheets On Time
 Others On Time
Submission of Report

MendelBryant 2016 10
MendelBryant 2016 11