INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Regular Teachers in the Proficient Stage

Name of Employee: AMELITA T. EDERIO Name of Rater: ESTRELLA A. TABUGON

Position: Teacher III Position: Master Teacher I

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: AGUSAN DEL SUR NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL - Agusan del Sur Date of Review: July 18, 2023

Rating Period: SY 2022-2023

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave

Basic Education 1. Content 1. Applied SY 2022- 7.00% Demonstrated Level 7 in the Demonstrated Level 6 in the Demonstrated Level 5 in the Demonstrated Level 4 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the
objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT
Services Knowledge and knowledge of 2023
rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter-
Pedagogy content within and observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms
across curriculum Quality or or
teaching areas No acceptable evidence No acceptable evidence
(PPST 1.1.2) was shown was shown 1 1.000 0.070

Objective was met within the 0 Objective was met but 0 No acceptable evidence
Efficiency allotted time instruction exceeded the was shown
allotted time

2. Used a range of SY 2022- 7.00% Demonstrated Level 7 in the Demonstrated Level 6 in the Demonstrated Level 5 in the Demonstrated Level 4 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the
objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT
teaching strategies 2023
rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter-
that enhance observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms
learner Quality or or
achievement in No acceptable evidence No acceptable evidence
literacy and was shown was shown 1 1.000 0.070
numeracy skills
(PPST 1.4.2)
Objective was met within the 0 Objective was met but 0 No acceptable evidence
Efficiency allotted time instruction exceeded the was shown
allotted time

3. Applied a range SY 2022- 7.00% Demonstrated Level 7 in the Demonstrated Level 6 in the Demonstrated Level 5 in the Demonstrated Level 4 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the
objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT
of teaching 2023
rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter-
strategies to observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms
develop critical and Quality or or
creative thinking, No acceptable evidence No acceptable evidence
as well as other was shown was shown 1 1.000 0.070
higher-order
thinking skills
Objective was met within the 0 Objective was met but 0 No acceptable evidence
(PPST 1.5.2) allotted time instruction exceeded the was shown
Efficiency
allotted time

Page 1 of 5
 TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Performance Indicators
Rating
Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave

Basic Education 1.
2. Content
Learning 1.
4. Applied
Managed SY 2022- 7.00% Demonstrated Level 7 in the Demonstrated Level 6 in the Demonstrated Level 5 in the Demonstrated Level 4 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the
Services Knowledge objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT
Environmentand
& knowledge of
classroom 2023
rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter-
Pedagogyof
Diversity content within
structure and
to engage observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms
Learners across curriculum
learners, or or
Quality
teaching areas
individually or in No acceptable evidence No acceptable evidence
(PPST 1.1.2)
groups, in was shown was shown 1 1.000 0.070
meaningful
exploration,
Objective was met within the 0 Objective was met but 0 No acceptable evidence
discovery and allotted time instruction exceeded the was shown
hands-on activities Efficiency
allotted time
within a range of
5. Managed SY 2022- 7% Demonstrated Level 7 in the Demonstrated Level 6 in the Demonstrated Level 5 in the Demonstrated Level 4 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the
objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT
learner behavior 2023
rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter-
constructively by observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms
applying positive Quality or or
and non-violent No acceptable evidence No acceptable evidence
discipline to ensure was shown was shown 1 1.000 0.070
learning- focused
environments
Objective was met within the 0 Objective was met but 0 No acceptable evidence
(PPST 2.6.2) allotted time instruction exceeded the was shown
Efficiency
allotted time

6. Used SY 2022- 7% Demonstrated Level 7 in the Demonstrated Level 6 in the Demonstrated Level 5 in the Demonstrated Level 4 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the
objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT
differentiated, 2023
rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter-
developmentally observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms
appropriate Quality or or
learning No acceptable evidence No acceptable evidence
experiences to was shown was shown 1 1.000 0.070
address learners’
gender, needs,
Objective was met within the 0 Objective was met but 0 No acceptable evidence
strengths, interests allotted time instruction exceeded the was shown
and experiences Efficiency
allotted time
(PPST 3.1.2)
3. Curriculum and 7. Planned, SY 2022- 7% Demonstrated Level 7 in the Demonstrated Level 6 in the Demonstrated Level 5 in the Demonstrated Level 4 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the
objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT
Planning managed and 2023
rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter-
implemented observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms
developmentally Quality or or
sequenced No acceptable evidence No acceptable evidence
teaching and was shown was shown 1 1.000 0.070
learning processes
to meet curriculum
Objective was met within the 0 Objective was met but 0 No acceptable evidence
requirements and allotted time instruction exceeded the was shown
varied teaching Efficiency
allotted time
contexts (PPST

Page 2 of 5
 TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Performance Indicators
Rating
Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave

Basic Education 1. Content 1.

8. Applied
Participated in SY 2022- 7.00%
7% Planned for enriched Reflected on practices Shared practices, teacher Attended LAC sessions / No acceptable evidence
Services Knowledge and knowledge of teaching practice based on during LAC sessions / FGDs and learner feedback during FGDs / meetings / other was shown
collegial 2023
LAC sessions / FGDs / / meetings / other collegial LAC sessions / FGDs / collegial discussions that
Pedagogy content within
discussions and
that meetings / other collegial discussions to plan, meetings / other collegial discuss teacher/learner
across curriculum
use teacher and discussions attended, as facilitate, and enrich discussions to plan, feedback to enrich
teachingfeedback
learner areas to Quality shown in MOV 3 teaching practice, as shown facilitate, and enrich instruction, as shown in
(PPST teaching
enrich 1.1.2) in MOV 3 teaching practice, as shown MOV 1 1 1.000 0.070
in MOV 2
practice (PPST 0.000 0.000
4.4.2)
Participated in collegial Participated in collegial Participated in collegial Participated in a collegial No acceptable evidence
discussions that discuss discussions that discuss discussions that discuss discussion that discusses was shown
teacher and learner teacher and learner teacher and learner teacher and learner
Timeliness feedback across 4 quarters feedback across 3 quarters feedback across 2 quarters feedback in only 1 quarter

9. Selected, SY 2022- 7% Demonstrated Level 7 in the Demonstrated Level 6 in the Demonstrated Level 5 in the Demonstrated Level 4 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the
objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT
developed, 2023
rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter-
organized and observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms
used appropriate Quality or or
teaching and No acceptable evidence No acceptable evidence
learning resources, was shown was shown 1 1.000 0.070
including ICT, to
address learning
Objective was met within the 0 Objective was met but 0 No acceptable evidence
goals (PPST 4.5.2) allotted time instruction exceeded the was shown
Efficiency
allotted time

4. Assessment 10. Designed, SY 2022- 7% Demonstrated Level 7 in the Demonstrated Level 6 in the Demonstrated Level 5 in the Demonstrated Level 4 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the
objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT
and Reporting selected, 2023
rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter-
organized and observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms
used diagnostic, Quality or or
formative and No acceptable evidence No acceptable evidence
summative was shown was shown 1 1.000 0.070
assessment
strategies
Objective was met within the 0 Objective was met but 0 No acceptable evidence
consistent with allotted time instruction exceeded the was shown
curriculum Efficiency
allotted time
requirements
11. Monitored and SY 2022- 7% Involved learner/s Monitored and evaluated Monitored and evaluated Monitored and evaluated No acceptable evidence
in monitoring and evaluation learner progress and learner progress and learner progress and was shown
evaluated learner 2023
of their own progress and achievement based on achievement based on the achievement based on an
progress and Quality achievement attainment data from an class attainment data existing grade level /
achievement using individual learner department / learning area
learner attainment report
0.000 0.000
data (PPST 5.2.2)
Submitted MOV/s show/s Submitted MOV/s show/s Submitted MOV/s show/s Submitted MOV/s show/s No acceptable evidence
monitoring and evaluation monitoring and evaluation monitoring and evaluation monitoring and evaluation was shown
Timeliness done across 4 quarters done across 3 quarters done across 2 quarters done in only 1 quarter

Page 3 of 5
 TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Performance Indicators
Rating
Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave

Basic Education 1. Content 1.

12.Applied
Communicated SY 2022- 7.00%
7% Sustained engagement Communicated promptly Communicated promptly Communicated learners’ No acceptable evidence
Services Knowledge and knowledge of through regular and clearly using various and clearly using only one needs, progress and was shown
promptly and 2023
communication of learners’ tools and strategies (1) strategy learners’ needs, achievement to key
Pedagogy contentthe
clearly within and needs, progress and learners’ needs, progress progress and achievement stakeholders, including
across curriculum
learners’ needs, achievement to key and achievement to key to key stakeholders, parents/guardians , but not
teaching areas
progress and stakeholders, including stakeholders, including including parents/guardians regularly as shown in the
Quality parents/guardians , as parents/guardians , as , as shown in the MOV MOV submitted 1 1.000 0.070
(PPST 1.1.2) to
achievement
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted
key stakeholders, submitted submitted
including 0.000 0.000
parents/guardians
(PPST 5.4.2)
Showed prompt Showed prompt Showed prompt Showed prompt No acceptable evidence
communication of learners’ communication of learners’ communication of learners’ communication of learners’ was shown
needs, progress and needs, progress and needs, progress and needs, progress and
Timeliness achievement across 4 achievement across 3 achievement across 2 achievement in only 1
quarters quarters quarters quarter

5. Personal 13. Applied a SY 2022- 7% Submitted MOV that details Submitted MOV that reflects Submitted MOV that shows Submitted MOV that No acceptable evidence
the consistent involvement involvement of learners in the application of a personal indicates a personal was shown
Growth and personal 2023
of learners in the teaching- the teaching-learning philosophy of teaching that philosophy of teaching that
Professional philosophy of learning process resulting process resulting from the is learner-centered is not learner- centered
Development teaching that is from the application of a application of a personal
learner-centered Quality personal philosophy of philosophy of teaching that
(PPST 7.1.2) teaching that is learner- is learner-centered
centered 0.000 0.000

Applied a personal Applied a personal Applied a personal Applied a personal No acceptable evidence
philosophy of teaching that philosophy of teaching that philosophy of teaching that philosophy of teaching that was shown
Timeliness is learner-centered across 4 is learner-centered across 3 is learner-centered across 2 is learner-centered in only 1
quarters quarters quarters quarter

14. Set SY 2022- 7% Updated professional Discussed progress on Set professional Accomplished the e-SAT at No acceptable evidence
development goals during professional development development goals based the beginning of the school was shown
professional 2023
Phase II of the RPMS Cycle goals with the rater during on e-SAT results as year as evidenced by MOV
development goals Quality as evidenced by MOV 4 the mid-year review as evidenced by MOV 2 1
based on the evidenced by MOV 3
Philippine
Professional 0.000 0.000
Submitted 4 acceptable Submitted 3 acceptable Submitted 2 acceptable Submitted 1 acceptable No acceptable evidence
Standards for Efficiency MOVs MOVs MOVs MOV was shown
Teachers (PPST
All four (4) submitted MOVs Three (3) of the submitted Two (2) of the submitted Only one (1) of the No acceptable evidence
7.5.2) were accomplished within MOVs were accomplished MOVs were accomplished submitted MOVs was was shown
Timeliness the prescribed RPMS Phase within the prescribed RPMS within the prescribed RPMS accomplished within the
Phase Phase prescribed RPMS Phase

Page 4 of 5
 TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Performance Indicators
Rating
Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave

Basic Education 1. Content

Plus Factor 1.
15.Applied
Performed SY 2022- 7.00%
2% Performed at least one (1) Performed at least one (1) Performed at least one (1) Performed at least one (1) No acceptable evidence
Services Knowledge and knowledge of related work / activity that related work / activity that related work / activity that related work / activity that was shown
various related 2023
contributed to the teaching- contributed to the teaching- contributed to the teaching- contributed to the teaching-
Pedagogy content within and
works/activities that learning process beyond the learning process within the learning process within the learning process within the
across curriculum
contribute to the school / Community school / Community learning area/department as class as evidenced by the
areas
teaching learning Quality Learning Center (CLC) as Learning Center (CLC) as evidenced by the submitted submitted MOV.
(PPST 1.1.2)
process (PPST evidenced by the submitted evidenced by the submitted MOV. 1 1.000 0.070
MOV. MOV.
8.1)

Submitted MOV that
details the achieved positive
contribution to the teaching-
learning process, as
Efficiency evidenced by the annotation
provided.
Submitted MOV that
details the perceived
positive contribution to the
teaching-learning process,
as evidenced by the
annotation provided.
Submitted MOV that
shows reasonable interlap
with the actual teaching-
learning process, as
evidenced by the annotation
provided.
Submitted MOV that No acceptable evidence 0.000 0.000
shows considerable overlap was shown
with, hence significantly
affecting the performance of
the actual teaching- learning
process.

Submitted MOVs were Submitted MOVs were Submitted MOVs were Submitted MOV/s was/were No acceptable evidence
Timeliness distributed across 4 quarters distributed across 3 quarters distributed across 2 quarters completed in only 1 quarter was shown

RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS Poor 0.630

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500 – 5.000 Outstanding
3.500 – 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 – 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 – 2.499 Unsatisfactory
below 1.499 Poor

AMELITA T. EDERIO ESTRELLA A. TABUGON MARILOU P. CURUGAN, DM-HRM

Ratee Rater Approving Authority

Page 5 of 5