1026 1882 1 PB

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

HARVEST TECHNOLOGY

Ralf Hübner, Dresden

Control of the Conveying Speed


on the Straw Walker

Theoretical calculations of the in- σ =1 - eK1 • tD + K2


fluence of the conveying speed on F arms which intend to utilize straw re-
main interested in conventional com-
bines. However, the capacity of the straw with K1 = K11 K2 = K21 at mMOG = 2 kg m-2
(1)

the straw walker lead to the insight walker has already been fully exploited. The K1 = K12 K2 = K22 at mMOG = 3 kg m-2
that an optimal conveying speed greatest problem is the very steep feedrate- K1 = K13 K2 = K23 at mMOG = 4 kg m-2
loss curve in the case of overloading. In or- K1 = K14 K2 = K24 at mMOG = 6 kg m-2
exists, which depends on the MOG der to reduce susceptibility to overloading, K1 = K15 K2 = K25 at mMOG = 7 kg m-2
feed rate. If the conveying speed is studies on conveying speed control on the allows the measured grain separation values
straw walker are being carried out. to be interpolated.
controlled depending on the MOG
feed rate, the feedrate-loss curve of The Problem Transformation on the Straw Walker
the straw walker is significantly The conveying speed has an influence on In order to cover the entire range of variation
flatter in particular at the upper both the height of the straw layer and the re- of the MOG mass loading mMOG, which is
tention time on the walker. Since both para- proportional to the layer height, another re-
loss level. For control, it is suffi- meters have opposing effects on the walker gression is carried out using the following
cient to measure the layer height on loss, this results in an optimal conveying equations with the values of the coefficients
the walker and to keep it at a con- speed. Experimentally, however, this opti- K11 … K15 and K21 … K25 as a function of
mum is difficult to determine because the mMOG:
stant level. Both on level and slop- parameters which can be used to vary the
ed fields, slope compensation in the conveying speed (rotational speed of the K1 = K1a • m2NKB + K1b mMOG + K1c (2)
walker, crankshaft stroke, inclination angle
levelled combine can be taken into of the walker unit) also change the other pa- K2 = K2a • m2NKB + K2b mMOG + K2c (3)
account in conveying speed con- rameters of the separating process (the num-
ber of impulses, the vertical and horizontal
trol. speed of impact of the straw layer on the
walker unit). In order to solve this problem,
the optimal conveying speed is considered
theoretically. These studies are based on tests
on a length-independent de-mixing test rig in
which a vertically oscillating sieve stimu-
lates oscillations in a straw layer and a fed-
on grain mass is de-mixed and separated.

The De-Mixing Test Rig

Dr.-Ing. Ralf Hübner is a scientist working at the On the de-mixing test rig, grain separation σ
Chair of Agricultural System Technology (director: is determined by forming the quotient of the
Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Bernhardt) at the Institute of separated and fed-on grain mass as a func-
Processing Machines and Mobile Machines of the tion of the separation time tD. Reference [1]
Technical University of Dresden, D-01062 Dresden;
e-mail: huebner@st.mw.tu-dresden.de
lists the grain separation values for several
MOG mass loadings mMOG (wheat straw) un-
der the conditions of constant mechanical
Keywords stimulation and grain mass loadings of mk = Fig. 1: Grain separation on a de-mixing test rig
Combine harvester, straw walker, conveying speed 2 kg m-2 (Fig. 1). The regression equation (according to [1])

400 62 LANDTECHNIK 6/2007


Fig. 2: Straw walker efficiency as a function of Fig. 3: Calculated feedrate loss curve Fig. 4: MOG mass loading as a function of the
the conveying speed specific MOG feed rate

If the results gained on the de-mixing test rig speeds. Values exceeding the optimal con- walker is relatively difficult. Therefore, a
are intended to be applied in the continuous veying speed exert a smaller influence than simpler possibility was sought.
process on the walker, the separation time tD values below the optimum. At a constant conveying speed, MOG
and the MOG mass loading mMOG must be mass loading is proportional to the specific
expressed as a function of the conveying Control of the Conveying Speed MOG feed rate. If, however, one calculates
speed vF. For this purpose, walker length ls MOG mass loading on the walker at the op-
and the specific MOG feed rate measured di- The conveying speed of common current timal conveying speeds under the individual
rectly on the walker are considered: straw walkers is vF = 0.5 … 0.7 m s-1. Figure conditions (eq. 5), mass loading is virtually
2 shows that this conveying speed range is independent of the specific MOG feed rate
tD = ls / vF (4) the optimum for specific MOG feed rates (Fig. 4). If bulk density is constant, MOG
qMOG = 1.5 … 2.0 kg m-1 s-1. For the conver- mass loading is proportional to layer height.
mNKB = qNKB / vF (5) sion of the specific MOG feed rate qMOG- For this reason, constant layer height is sui-
measured directly on the walker into the table as a variable for the control of the con-
σ = ηs (6) MOG feed rate QMOG of a real combine, veying speed on the walker. Layer height is
channel width and MOG separation in the easier to measure than the conveying speed.
On the walker, grain separation σ corre- threshing unit and on the walker of the com- Potential measuring methods are mechanical
sponds to walker efficiency ηs (eq.6). If bine must be taken into consideration. For feelers and ultrasonic or laser distance mea-
equation 5 is put into equation 2 and 3 and this purpose, curves from laboratory and surement, for example.
the latter are put into equation 1 together field tests were used. For a 6-walker com- The control of the conveying speed on the
with equations 4 and 6, walker efficiency bine, conversion leads to an MOG feed rate walker requires a solution to the problem
can be derived: of QMOG = 15 … 19 t h-1. Hence, the convey- that the other parameters of the separating
ing speeds used today are only optimal for process may not be changed. One possibility
this MOG feed rate range in a 6-walker com- would be additional conveying elements on
(7) bine. At higher MOG feed rates, the convey- the walker. Moreover, the consideration of
ing speed must be increased, whereas it must slope compensation in the control of the con-
Calculated Optimal Conveying Speed be reduced if the MOG feed rate is lower. veying speed in a levelled combine on both
However, the control of the conveying speed level and sloped fields is conceivable.
Equation 7 enables walker efficiency to be is most useful at higher MOG feed rates.
calculated for different conveying speeds, Capacity increase due to control based on
walker lengths, and specific MOG feed the optimal conveying speed vF optimal as
rates. Figure 2 shows calculated walker effi- compared with the constant conveying speed
ciency for the common walker length ls = vF = 0.6 m s-1 at a walker length of ls = 4.5 m
4.5 m as a function of vF with qMOG as a pa- is illustrated by the feedrate-loss curves
rameter. The markings on the curves cover shown in Figure 3. In order to determine
the examined range mMOG = 2 … 7 kg m-2. these curves, the walker loss is calculated
For higher vF values, K1 and K2 were extra- from walker efficiency (eq. 7) taking the
polated for mMOG < 2 kg m-2. As expected, thresher efficiency measured in the labora-
walker efficiency drops with increasing spe- tory into account. Especially at the higher
Literature
cific MOG feed rates. However, it also be- loss level, the feedrate-loss curve is consi- [1] • Beck, Th.: Messverfahren zur Beurteilung des
Stoffeigenschaftseinflusses auf die Leistung der
comes clear that walker efficiency reaches a derably flatter and reduces the susceptibility Trennprozesse im Mähdrescher. Fortschritt-
maximum and thus an optimal conveying of the walker to overloading. Berichte VDI Reihe 14, Nr. 54, VDI-Verlag,
speed vF optimal exists. With growing qMOG, the Under practical conditions, the measure- Düsseldorf, 1992, Dissertation, Universität
maximum shifts towards higher conveying ment of the conveying speed on the straw Hohenheim

62 LANDTECHNIK 6/2007 401

You might also like