Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full Download Book Abatement of Environmental Pollutants Trends and Strategies PDF
Full Download Book Abatement of Environmental Pollutants Trends and Strategies PDF
Edited by
PARDEEP SINGH
AJAY KUMAR
ANWESHA BORTHAKUR
Elsevier
Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands
The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United Kingdom
50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
Mohd Aamir Center of Advanced Study in Shalini Gupta School of Environment and Sus-
Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu tainable Development, Central University of
University, Varanasi, India Gujarat, Gandhinagar, India
Arif Ahamad School of Environmental Sciences Deepak Gupta Institute of Environment &
(SES), Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Sustainable Development, Banaras Hindu
Delhi, India University, Varanasi, India
Assel I. Akhmetova Advanced Technologies Garima Kaushik Department of Environmental
Center, Moscow, Russian Federation Science, School of Earth Sciences, Central Uni-
Rahul Bhadouria Department of Botany, Insti- versity of Rajasthan, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India
tute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Razia Khan Department of Microbiology, Gir-
Varanasi, India; Department of Botany, Uni- ish Raval College of Science, Gujarat Univer-
versity of Delhi, Delhi, India sity, Gandhinagar, India
A.K. Bhatiya Department of Biotechnology, Zeenat Khan Environmental Genomics and
GLA University, Mathura, India Proteomics Lab, BRD School of Biosciences,
Muhammad Bilal College of Biotechnology, Satellite Campus, Sardar Patel University,
Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Vallabh Vidyanagar, India
Tianjin, China Arvind Kumar State Key Laboratory of Cotton
Preetismita Borah CSIR-Central Scientific Biology, Key Laboratory of Plant Stress Biol-
Instruments Organisation, Chandigarh, India ogy, School of Life Science, Henan University,
Kaifeng, Henan, PR China
Anwesha Borthakur Leuven International and
European Studies (LINES), Katholieke Uni- Ajay Kumar Agriculture Research Organization
versiteit Leuven, Belgium (ARO), Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion, Israel
Antra Chatterjee Molecular Biology Section, Cash Kumar Cytogenetics Laboratory, Depart-
Centre for Advanced Study in Botany, ment of Zoology, Institute of Science, Banaras
Department of Botany, Banaras Hindu Hindu University, Varanasi, India
University, Varanasi, India Manish Kumar CSIR-Central Scientific In-
Mohd Ashraf Dar Department of Environ- struments Organisation, Chandigarh, India
mental Science, School of Earth Sciences, Cen- Arun Kumar Bihar Agricultural University,
tral University of Rajasthan, Ajmer, Rajasthan, Sabour, Bhagalpur, India
India
Sughosh Madhav School of Environmental
Pooja Devi CSIR-Central Scientific Instruments Sciences (SES), Jawaharlal Nehru University,
Organisation, Chandigarh, India New Delhi, India
Rajkumari Sanayaima Devi Deen Dayal P.K. Mishra Department of Chemical Engi-
Upadhyaya College (University of Delhi), New neering and Technology, Indian Institute of
Delhi, India Technology (Banaras Hindu University), Vara-
Akanksha Gupta Institute of Environment & nasi, India
Sustainable Development, Banaras Hindu
University, Varanasi, India
ix
x CONTRIBUTORS
Virendra Kumar Mishra Institute of Environ- Rajesh Kumar Singh Department of Dravya-
ment & Sustainable Development, Banaras guna, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras
Hindu University, Varanasi, India Hindu University, Varanasi, India
Arpan Modi Agriculture Research Organiza- Tripti Singh Department of Biotechnology, GLA
tion, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Devel- University, Mathura, India; Department of
opment Volcani Centre, Rishon LeZion, Israel Chemical Engineering and Technology, Indian
Dan Bahadur Pal Department of Chemical Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu Uni-
Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, versity), Varanasi, India
Mesra, Ranchi, India Sandeep Kumar Singh Center of Advanced
Shilpi Pandey Department of Botany, Institute Study in Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras
of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Vara- Hindu University, Varanasi, India
nasi, India Vipin Kumar Singh Center of Advanced Study
Amit Kumar Patel Institute of Environment & in Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu
Sustainable Development, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
University, Varanasi, India Manoj Kumar Singh Department of Chemistry,
Vipul Patel Environment Management Group, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz-
Center for Environment Education, Ahmeda- khas, India
bad, India Rishikesh Singh Institute of Environment &
Bhawana Pathak School of Environment and Sustainable Development, Banaras Hindu
Sustainable Development, Central University University, Varanasi, India
of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, India Gurudatta Singh Institute of Environment &
Sustainable Development, Banaras Hindu
Deepak Pathania Department of Environmental
University, Varanasi, India
Sciences, Central University of Jammu, District
Samba, India Raghwendra Singh Crop Production Division,
ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research,
Priyanka Cytogenetics Laboratory, Department
Varanasi, India
of Zoology, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu
University, Varanasi, India Prashant Kumar Singh Agriculture Research
Organization, Ministry of Agriculture and Ru-
Bhadouria Rahul Department of Botany,
ral Development Volcani Centre, Rishon
University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
LeZion, Israel
Archana Rai Department of Molecular and
Pratap Srivastava Department of Botany, Insti-
Cellular Biology, Sam Higginbotom Institute
tute of Science, Banaras Hindu University,
of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences
Varanasi, India; Shyama Prasad Mukherjee
(SHIATS), Allahabad, India
Government Degree College, Phaphamau,
Amit Ranjan Department of Kayachikitsa Prayagraj, India
Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu
Akhileshwar Kumar Srivastava The National
University, Varanasi, India
Institute for Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben-
Divya Singh Center of Advanced Study in Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva,
Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu Israel
University, Varanasi, India
Neha Srivastava Department of Chemical
Pardeep Singh Department of Environmental Engineering and Technology, Indian Institute
Science, PGDAV College, University of Delhi, of Technology (Banaras Hindu University),
New Delhi, India Varanasi, India
CONTRIBUTORS xi
Manita Thakur Department of Chemistry, Juan Francisco Villareal Chiu Universidad
Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Solan, Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Cien-
India cias Químicas, Laboratorio de Biotecnología.
Kangming Tian Department of Biological Av. Universidad S/N Ciudad Universitaria,
Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, Mexico
Engineering and Materials Science, Tianjin Wang Wenjing State Key Laboratory of Cotton
University of Science and Technology, Tianjin, Biology, Henan Key Laboratory of Plant Stress
China Biology, School of Life Science, Henan Univer-
Dhanesh Tiwary Department of Chemistry, sity, Kaifeng, Henan, China
Indian Institute of Technology (IIT-BHU), Deepanker Yadav Department of Vegetable
Varanasi, India and Fruit Science, Institute of Plant Science,
Sachchidanand Tripathi Deen Dayal Upad- Agriculture Research Organization (ARO), The
hyaya College (University of Delhi), New Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion, Israel
Delhi, India Igor V. Yaminsky Lomonosov Moscow State
Ruchita Tripathi Department of Dravyaguna, University, Moscow, Russian Federation
Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu
University, Varanasi, India
C H A P T E R
1
Bioremediation: a sustainable
approach for management of
environmental contaminants
Pardeep Singh1, Vipin Kumar Singh2, Rishikesh Singh3,
Anwesha Borthakur4, Sughosh Madhav5, Arif Ahamad5,
Ajay Kumar6, Dan Bahadur Pal7, Dhanesh Tiwary8,
P.K. Mishra9
1
Department of Environmental Science, PGDAV College, University of Delhi, New Delhi,
India; 2Center of Advanced Study in Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University,
Varanasi, India; 3Institute of Environment & Sustainable Development, Banaras Hindu
University, Varanasi, India; 4Leuven International and European Studies (LINES), Katholieke
Universiteit Leuven, Belgium; 5School of Environmental Sciences (SES), Jawaharlal Nehru
University, New Delhi, India; 6Agriculture Research Organization (ARO), Volcani Center,
Rishon LeZion, Israel; 7Department of Chemical Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology,
Mesra, Ranchi, India; 8Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT-BHU),
Varanasi, India; 9Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Indian Institute of
Technology (Banaras Hindu University), Varanasi, India
1. Introduction
Polluted soil resulting from industrial or agricultural processes poses serious health
hazards to humans and animals and thus can have damaging consequences on the
ecosystems by making land inappropriate for cultivation and other fiscal purposes. Various
industries such as carpet, textile, and petrochemical production create intensive problems in
the natural environment by disposing toxic wastes on one hand and generating a huge quan-
tity of waste, oily sludge, and petroleum waste enriched soil on the other hand, which
constitutes a major confront for hazardous waste management (Farhadian et al., 2008).
Apart from this, oil shipping is also one of the key causes of environmental contamination
where the land and water gets polluted because of the oil spill, ship breakage, and seepage
of oil pipelines.
The economically viable and environmentally feasible management of industrial sludge is
a major concern worldwide. For disposal of industrial sludge, globally adopted technologies
comprise of landfilling, high-temperature drying, sludge spreading on land surface,
lime added stabilization, burning, and composting. Because of excessive expenditure on
sludge management, the majority of textile industries in India generally released their
wastewater effluents in the farming fields, open dumps, fallow land, and ineffectively
controlled sanitary landfills and alongside the railway tracks. It further contaminates ground-
water causing serious human health hazards. Meanwhile, low availability of landfill area,
rigorous national wastes discarding policy, and local people awareness have caused landfill-
ing and land spreading highly costly and impractical. The sludge management practices
in most of the developing countries are not well developed. Currently, several factories
and municipalities are working on environment-friendly and low-cost sludge treatment
practices. Thus, it is imperative to mitigate toxic environmental contaminants for sustainable
development (Kümmerer et al., 2019).
A number of physical and chemical methods are currently being employed at large scale
for municipal wastewater management chiefly based on sewage treatment plants (STPs).
In addition to building expenses, upholding troubles in treatment plants has raised the query
of sustainability. Furthermore, surplus sewage sludge formed by these treatment plants
has posed more severe confines on release during the previous few decades (Vigueros and
Camperos, 2002). Several developing countries cannot meet the expense of construction of
STPs, necessitating the development of some eco-friendly and economically feasible machin-
ery for in situ wastewater management. Under such critical conditions, a few eco-friendly
techniques can resolve the limitations linked with secure and economically efficient
wastewater management machinery.
Bioremediation is an emerging and innovative technology because of its economic
feasibility, enhanced competence, and natural environment friendliness. The technology uses
various eco-friendly microbial processes to handle the ever-rising environmental pollution
problem. In such approaches, microbes adjust themselves against noxious wastes and environ-
mentally adapted microbial strains grow naturally, which subsequently convert a wide variety
of toxic chemicals into nontoxic forms. The microbial degradation of xenobiotics is based on
enzyme activities. It further includes rhizoremediation, phytoremediation (McCutcheon and
Jørgensen, 2008; Chang et al., 2009), and vermicomposting depending on the biological
activities involved. Phytoremediation is based on plant-assisted extenuation of pollutant
concentrations at the contaminated sites, whereas rhizoremediation includes the elimination
of specific pollutants from impure sites by the mutual interface of plant roots and appropriate
microbial flora (Rajkumar et al., 2012). Because bioremediation appears to be a promising
substitute to conventional cleanup machinery, extensive research is being carried out in this
field. Vermicomposting and vermifiltration are natural waste management procedures relying
on the utilization of worms to change organic wastes to form soil-enriching compounds
(Vettori et al., 2012). Domestic wastewater and industrial sludge management can be accom-
plished through these processes in a sustainable way (Benitez et al., 2002). In addition, a
substantial decrease in pathogens has been observed up to the end-products level. Therefore,
2. Application of bioremediation for environmental pollutants cleanup 3
it can be securely used for land application. Biological methods have been reviewed and
acknowledged for remediation of environmental pollutant. In this chapter, we have tried to
focus on the application of biological methods which were used for effective waste treatment.
Several different strategies of bioremediation have also been discussed in later sections.
(A) Bioremediation of
heavy metals
Biorestoration
Enhanced
Cellulosic materials sulfate reduction
and agricultural wastes
Radionuclide
Immobilization
Insitu As removal by Fe
oxides & microorganisms
(B)
Bioremediation techniques
Windrow
Ex-situ
Enhanced
Bioreactor
Land Farming
Inorganic Organic
Pollutant Pollutant
Arsenic
Dye
FIGURE 1.1 Different strategies (A) and methods (B) of bioremediation of various inorganic and organic
contaminants.
2. Application of bioremediation for environmental pollutants cleanup 5
TABLE 1.1 Microorganism involved in organic pollutant degradation.
Organic Degradation
pollutants Microbes condition Efficiency References
N-alkanes and PAHs Pseudomonas sp. WJ6 92.46% Xia et al. (2014)
Crude oil Colwellia, Cycloclasticus e e Wang et al. (2016a)
Phenolic compounds Microbial fuel cells Bio-electro- e Hedbavna et al. (2016)
chemical-systems
Crude oil Anabaena oryzae, Mixotrophic e Hamouda et al. (2016)
Chlorella kessleri, conditions
and its consortium
PAHs and Fusibacter, Alkaliphilus, Anaerobic e Folwell et al. (2016)
Naphthenic acids Desulfobacterium, Variovorax, biodegradation
Thauera, Hydrogenophaga
Pyrene Mycobacterium gilvum Immobilized on e Deng et al. (2016)
peanut shell
powder
have evolved specific resistance mechanism that permits their existence (Luo et al., 2014)
under heavy metal enriched conditions. These microbes are efficient to alleviate the concen-
tration of metal contaminants in their vicinity. Microorganisms are observed to proficiently
eliminate dissolved and suspended metals, particularly from a medium having very low
concentrations through bioaccumulation, surface complexation, and biosorption; therefore,
methods relying on microbial process offer a substitute to the conservative practices of metal
remediation (Dundar et al., 2014). Microbes reported for management of heavy metals are
tabulated in Table 1.2.
Direct Red-31 dye Chlorella pyrenoidosa Batch experiments/ 96% Decolorization Sinha et al. (2016)
strain NCIM 2738 continuous cyclic with 40 mg L 1
bioreactor treatment dye at pH 3
Reactive green Fungal strain e 97.9% Decolorization Sinha and Osborne
dye (RGD) VITAF-1 of RGD within (2016)
48 h at 30 2 C
Crystal violet Trichoderma asperellum e Shanmugam et al.
(2017)
Industrial Chaetomium globosum Stirred and static Dye removal Manai et al. (2016)
textile effluent IMA1 KJ472923 batch cultures adsorption (8%) and
degradation (92%)
Hair dye Enterobacter cloacae e e Maiti et al. (2017)
DDB I
Azure B dye Bacillus sp. MZS10 93.55% (0.04 g L 1) Li et al. (2014)
within 14 h
Resonance Bacterial e e Kumar et al. (2012)
stabilized and consortium-AVS,
heteropolyaromatic consisting of Pseudomonas
dyes desmolyticum NCIM 2112,
Kocuria rosea MTCC 1532,
and Micrococcus glutamicus
NCIM 2168
2. Application of bioremediation for environmental pollutants cleanup 9
2.3.1.2 Anaerobic treatment
Under anaerobic condition, azo-dye reduction is achieved by breakage of the azo-bonds.
Under the anaerobic situation, cleaving of dyes occurs, which produces toxic aromatic amines
by bacterial metabolism (Bhatt et al., 2005).
The pesticide consumption for agricultural applications is 0.5, 6.6, and 12.0 kg ha 1 for India,
Korea, and Japan, respectively (Gupta, 2004). Earlier, the pesticide application, as anticipated,
was quite helpful in reducing crop yield loss happening because of insect pest attack and thus
opened the way for enhancement in crop productivity. However, extensive application of
chemically synthesized pesticides has given rise to contamination of the natural environment
and also caused several chronic impacts on human society (Bhanti and Taneja, 2007).
The stable nature, long-term existence in the natural environment, biological magnification,
and accumulation at various trophic levels due to their lack of selectivity, and organochlo-
rines have been reported to be responsible for pest resistance development and hazardous
effect on nontarget organisms (Carson, 1962). The possible threats to all living organisms
arising from the indiscriminate application of these agricultural chemicals have now
emerged as one of the most potent environmental or health problems particularly in Third
World countries. Pesticides are mainly criticized for their availability in drinking water,
vegetables, mammalian blood, human food, milk products, fat samples, and other food
commodities. There is no contradiction regarding the human health hazards associated
with the application and chronic exposure to pesticides. Hence, the presence of pesticide
residue in different environmental samples via contaminated food chain is a direct indication
of acute or chronic exposure and average body risk to persistent pesticides.
(Continued)
12 1. Bioremediation: a sustainable approach for management of environmental contaminants
TABLE 1.4 List of microbes responsible for degradation of pharmaceuticals and pesticides.dcont'd
Pharmaceuticals/ Degradation Degradation
pesticides Microbes condition efficiency Reference
are unable to utilize few PPCPs as carbon and energy source because of their substrate
specificity. Under such conditions, other substrate needs to be amended in medium to fulfill
the requirement of carbon and energy source so as to maintain the vital metabolic activities at
optimal rate. For instance, the stable nature of carbamazepine often does not allow the
efficient degradation by microbes. But, mixed consortium consisting of an unidentified basid-
iomycete member (Santoso et al., 2011) and Streptomyces MIUG (Popa et al., 2014) was noticed
to breakdown the carbamazepine in medium supplemented with glucose. Along with
carbamazepine, iopromide was also susceptible to degradation after additional substrates
were amended in the medium. Liu et al. (2013) demonstrated that Pseudomonas sp. I-24 bears
the ability to degrade iopromide with starch as primary supplement. Diclofenac has been
reported to display high resistance to biological degeneration in activated sludge system.
However, Hata et al. (2010) showed that white-rot fungi is capable to fully remove diclofenac
to the safety limits prescribed for the organisms without any added supplement. The micro-
bial enzyme activation has been suggested as another important factor leading to PPCPs
degradation. The biological breakdown of PPCPs relies on whether microbes are able to
synthesize the essential enzymes responsible for degradation. For example, triclosan is
known to stimulate Nitrosomonas europaea to synthesize ammonia monooxygenase to facilitate
fast degradation of triclosan (Roh et al., 2009). However, few PPCPs including ciprofloxacin,
tetracycline, and trimethoprim do not readily stimulate microbes to synthesize the specific
enzyme, thus, leading to inefficient biodegradation. Most importantly, there is no report
2. Application of bioremediation for environmental pollutants cleanup 13
on contribution of any pure culture isolated so far in decomposition of ciprofloxacin, tetracy-
cline, and trimethoprim. Therefore, to facilitate the effective biodegradation of hazardous
recalcitrant PPCPs, the primary requirement is to stimulate the microorganisms with the
ability to produce the specific degradative enzyme in a given environmental condition.
Length to end of tail 3 7 1/2/12 inches; bill along the ridge 8 3/4/12; wing
from flexure 1 10/12; tail 1 1 1/2/12.
Cleome heptaphylla.
Strix Tengmalmi, Gmel. Syst. Nat. vol. i. p. 291.—Lath. Ind. Ornith. vol. i. p.
65.
Strix Tengmalmi, Tengmalm’s Owl, Swains. and Richards. Fauna Bor.-
Amer. vol. ii. p. 94.
Anas hyperborea, Gmel. Syst. Nat. vol. i. p. 504.—Lath. Ind. Orn. vol. ii. p.
837.
Snow Goose, Anas hyperborea, Wils. Amer. Ornith. vol. viii. p. 76, pl. 68,
fig. 3, Male, and p. 89, pl. 69, fig. 5, Young.
Anser hyperboreus, Ch. Bonaparte, Synopsis of Birds of United States, p.
376.
Anser hyperboreus, Snow Goose, Richards. and Swains. Fauna Bor.-
Amer. vol. ii. p. 467.
Snow Goose, Nuttall, Manual, vol. ii. p. 344.
Tetrao Phasianellus, Linn. Syst. Nat. vol. i. p. 273.—Lath. Ind. Ornith. vol.
ii. p. 635.—Ch. Bonaparte, Synopsis of Birds of United States, p. 127.
Tetrao Phasianellus, Sharp-tailed Grous, Ch. Bonaparte, Amer. Ornith.
vol. iii. p. 37, pl. 19.
Tetrao (centrocercus) Phasianellus, Swains. Sharp-tailed Grous,
Richards. and Swains. Fauna Bor.-Amer. vol. ii. p. 361.
Sharp-tailed Grous, Nuttall, Manual, vol. i. p. 669.
This Owl is much more abundant in our Middle and Eastern Atlantic
Districts than in the Southern or Western parts. My friend Dr
Bachman has never observed it in South Carolina; nor have I met
with it in Louisiana, or any where on the Mississippi below the
junction of the Ohio. It is not very rare in the upper parts of Indiana,
Illinois, Ohio, and Kentucky, wherever the country is well wooded. In
the Barrens of Kentucky its predilection for woods is rendered
apparent by its not being found elsewhere than in the “Groves;” and
it would seem that it very rarely extends its search for food beyond
the skirts of those delightful retreats. In Pennsylvania, and elsewhere
to the eastward, I have found it most numerous on or near the banks
of our numerous clear mountain streams, where, during the day, it is
not uncommon to see it perched on the top of a low bush or fir. At
such times it stands with the body erect, but the tarsi bent and
resting on a branch, as is the manner of almost all our Owls. The
head then seems the largest part, the body being much more
slender than it is usually represented. Now and then it raises itself
and stands with its legs and neck extended, as if the better to mark
the approach of an intruder. Its eyes, which were closed when it was
first observed, are opened on the least noise, and it seems to squint
at you in a most grotesque manner, although it is not difficult to