Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 13

Green Processing and Synthesis 2024; 13: 20230229

Research Article

Aneesa Zia, Ayesha Shahzad, Nadia Riaz, Sara Khan, Umar Farooq, Syed Majid Bukhari,
Rizwana Sarwar*, Asaad Khalid, Hamdy Kashtoh*, Ajmal Khan*, and Ahmed Al-Harrasi*

Enhancement efficacy of omeprazole by


conjugation with silver nanoparticles as a urease
inhibitor
https://doi.org/10.1515/gps-2023-0229 found for nanoparticles (IC50 = 2.17 ± 0.10 µg·mL−1) as com-
received November 08, 2023; accepted February 20, 2024 pared to omeprazole (IC50 = 5.28 ± 0.14 µg·mL−1). The radical
Abstract: Omeprazole, a proton pump inhibitor, is used for scavenging activity of nanoparticles also increased signifi-
gastric and duodenal ulcers, gastroesophageal reflux dis- cantly. The synthesized nanoparticles were docked in the
ease, Helicobacter pylori infection, etc. Current research is active site of urease to investigate their binding mode.
based on the loading of omeprazole on surface silver Due to excellent urease and bacterial inhibition, these nano-
nanoparticles by chemical method. The appearance of particles can be used for ulcers.
an absorption peak at 421 nm confirmed the synthesis of Keywords: omeprazole, nanoparticles, chemical synthesis
nanoparticles. The FT-IR further confirmed the conjuga- method, radical scavenging activity, urease inhibition
tion of functional groups present in omeprazole moiety
with silver. The size and morphology were elucidated by
transmission electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction
which revealed a spherical shape with an average particle 1 Introduction
size of 16–20 nm. To know enhancement in their efficacy,
the omeprazole-loaded nanoparticles were evaluated against Peptic ulcers are one of the most common gastrointestinal
antibacterial, urease inhibition, and antioxidant activities. conditions affecting approximately 10% of the population
Nanoparticles showed significant antibacterial potential across the globe. An imbalance between the gastro-protec-
against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli with tive factors such as mucus and antioxidant enzymes bicar-
12 ± 0.41 and 13.6 ± 1.02 mm zones of inhibition, respectively. bonate and secretion of acid and pepsin damages the
Almost 2.43 times enhanced urease inhibitory activity was mucosal membrane of the stomach and duodenum and
results in life-threatening ulcers [1,2]. Approximately 15,000
fatalities are reported annually as a consequence of ulcers
 [3]. It has become one of the most widespread problems
* Corresponding author: Rizwana Sarwar, Department of Chemistry, affecting 40% of developed countries and 80% of developing
COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad Campus, 22060, KPK,
countries due to the indiscriminate use of non-steroidal anti-
Pakistan, e-mail: rizwanasarwar@cuiatd.edu.pk
* Corresponding author: Hamdy Kashtoh, Department of
inflammatory disease and Helicobacter pylori infections [4].
Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, 38541, Gyeongbuk, Reactive oxygen species play a significant role in the etiology
Republic of Korea, e-mail: hamdy_kashtoh@ynu.ac.kr of peptic ulcers, as the free radical released from the neu-
* Corresponding author: Ajmal Khan, Natural and Medical Sciences trophils and monocytes can cause oxidative damage to the
Research Center, University of Nizwa, Nizwa, 616, Sultanate of Oman, cells of gastric mucosa via lipid peroxidation and oxidation
e-mail: ajmalkhan@unizwa.edu.om
of proteins [5]. Using medications with antioxidant proper-
* Corresponding author: Ahmed Al-Harrasi, Natural and Medical
Sciences Research Center, University of Nizwa, Nizwa, 616, Sultanate of ties can be effective in the treatment of ulcers [6]. Antiulcer
Oman, e-mail: aharrasi@unizwa.edu.om medications work by suppressing the secretion of gastric
Aneesa Zia, Ayesha Shahzad, Sara Khan, Umar Farooq, Syed Majid acid and stimulating the immune system by enhancing the
Bukhari: Department of Chemistry, COMSATS University Islamabad, secretion of mucin [7]. Antacids, H2 receptor blockers, mus-
Abbottabad Campus, 22060, KPK, Pakistan
carinic antagonists, and proton pump inhibitors are used in
Nadia Riaz: Department of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University
Islamabad, Abbottabad Campus, 22060, KPK, Pakistan
the treatment of ulcers. However, the successful eradication
Asaad Khalid: Substance Abuse and Toxicology Research Center, Jazan of H. pylori is essential for the treatment of peptic ulcers and
University, P.O. Box 114, Jazan, 45142, Saudi Arabia avoiding its recurrence. Triple therapy containing two

Open Access. © 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2  Aneesa Zia et al.

antibiotics clarithromycin and amoxicillin or metronidazole antibiotics could be increased by combining them with NPs
along with proton pump inhibitors is currently being used as [20,21]. Among metallic NPs, silver nanoparticles are well
a standard treatment. However, over the past 10–15 years, known for their broad spectrum activities [22]. The envir-
due to the rising incidence of antibiotic resistance, notably onmentally friendly manufacturing of silver nanoparticles
with clarithromycin, the effectiveness of this triple therapy is emerging as a novel and effective approach to the treat-
has considerably decreased. Consequently, there is a rising ment of gastrointestinal ulcers [6]. Various sources were
need of developing potential antiulcer agents for effective used for the synthesis of silver nanoparticles for the anti-
treatment of ulcers [8]. ulcer activity. The AgNPs synthesized from Glycyrrhiza
Omeprazole, a sulfinyl benzimidazole [9] is the first glabra root extract were found to have antiulcer activity
clinically approved member of unique antisecretory drugs, [23]. Similarly, Solanum xanthocarpum extract-loaded silver
the proton pump inhibitors that control the secretion of nanoparticles were proven to have antibacterial and urease
gastric acid via irreversible inhibition of enzyme H+/K+ inhibitory properties against H. pylori [24].
-ATPase located in the parietal cells of stomach [10,11]. It The AgNPs synthesized from the seeds of Anethum
is found to be a potent inhibitor of gastric acid secretion for graveolens were tested against proton pump (H+/K+-ATPase)
the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, gastritis, inhibition and they were found to have inhibitory potential
Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, gastric and duodenal ulcers, against the enzyme establishing proton pump inhibition by
H. pylori infection, and other associated hypersecretory AgNPs [25].
disorders [12,13]. Omeprazole and silver nanoparticles are well known
Omeprazole is susceptible to heat, light, and humidity for their antiulcer activities. Literature has revealed that a
and undergoes rapid degradation in acidic solutions [14]. combination of drugs with nanoparticles may enhance their
Hence, its exposure to the acidic contents of stomach therapeutic potential as compared to drugs and NPs alone.
results in the inactivation of almost fifty percent of the Current research aims at synthesizing silver nanoparticles
dose leading to its poor bioavailability [15]. The most effec- of omeprazole by chemical reduction method. To the best of
tive approach to prevent its degradation via stomach acid our knowledge, this is the first study reporting the synthesis
is to incorporate omeprazole into enteric-coated polymeric of omeprazole-loaded silver nanoparticles and their urease
nanoparticles and extend its half-life [1]. Due to their small inhibition, antioxidant, and antibacterial activities against
size, NPs can pass through the mucus layer and adhere to Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli.
the underlying epithelium or the mucus network directly.
Drug when administered in the form of mucoadhesive
nanoparticles can reside in the stomach for a longer period 2 Materials and methods
of time and these adhesive interactions may increase
drug’s bioavailability via number of mechanism [16]. Var-
2.1 Materials
ious omeprazole-loaded nanoparticles have been reported
in literature including omeprazole-loaded cellulose acid
The chemicals and solvents including AgNO3, sodium hydro-
phthalate nanoparticles [1], omeprazole-loaded gliadin
xide, HCl, sodium borohydride (NaBH4), and methanol used
nanoparticles [16], omeprazole containing eudragit chit-
for the synthesis were of analytical grade and purchased
osan nanoparticles [17], and omeprazole containing Bletilla
from Sigma Aldrich; vendor Musaji, Abbottabad, Pakistan.
striata nanoparticles (OME-BSP NPs) [18]. The OMP-NPs
Nutrient agar was purchased from Oxoid Ltd, Basingstoke
effectively prevented gastric mucosal lesions and have
Hampshire, UK. The DPPH powder and the urease enzyme
enhanced antiulcer activity as compared to omeprazole.
were purchased from Alfa Aesar and Sigma Aldrich, vendor
The enteric-coated nanoparticles postpone the release of
Musaji, Abbottabad, Pakistan, respectively. UV–Vis spectra
the medication because it is insoluble in acidic environ-
were recorded on Spectromax M2 (COMSATS University
ments. [19]. Enhanced gastric mucosal defense through
Islamabad Abbottabad Campus). For pH adjustment, a
increased production of mucus and bicarbonate, decreased
pH meter (Combo pH/EC/TDS Testers HANNA Instrument)
gastric acid secretion volume, or simply neutralizing the
was used.
gastric acidity are some of the mechanisms that mediate
the protection of the gastric mucosa against acid produc-
tion [14]. 2.2 Synthesis of nanoparticles
It has been demonstrated that metallic nanoparticle
conjugation with antibiotics offers promising outcomes in Omeprazole-loaded silver nanoparticles were synthesized
the treatment of infectious diseases. The effectiveness of via chemical reduction method. Around 16.9 mg of AgNO3
Omeprazole conjugation with silver nanoparticles as a urease inhibitor  3

was dissolved in 100 mL of distilled water to prepare 1 mM 2.4.2 Heat stability test
solution of silver nitrate and the solution was kept in dark
to prevent light exposure. Similarly, 34.54 mg of omepra- The heat stability of omeprazole-loaded AgNPs was checked
zole was dissolved in 100 mL of methanol to prepare its by heating the reaction solutions at different temperatures,
1 mM solution. After mixing the drug and salt solution no i.e., 25°C, 50°C, 75°C, and 100°C for 30 min [26]. Around 15 mL
significant color change was observed, so 2–3 drops of of freshly prepared nanoparticle solution was taken in four
NaBH4 (40 mM) were added to the solution which pro- separate beakers and heated at different temperatures for
duced rapid variation in the color of solution indicating 30 min to check the heat stability of nanoparticles and
the formation of silver nanoparticles which was further UV–Vis spectra were recorded. The change in the absorption
confirmed by UV–Vis spectrophotometer. intensity provides data about the stability of synthesized
AgNPs at different temperatures.

2.3 Optimization of nanoparticles 2.4.3 Brine stability test

The reaction was optimized by mixing different concentra- The stability of synthesized omeprazole-loaded silver nano-
tions of silver nitrate and omeprazole to achieve optimum particles was determined against different concentrations of
drug-to-metal ratio for the synthesis of nanoparticles. The brine solutions. The 4 mL of freshly prepared Omp-AgNPs
ratio at which the maximum formation of nanoparticles were taken in four separate vials. Then, 2 mL of 0.5, 1, 1.5,
occurs can be achieved by optimization. In this study, the and 2 M solutions of NaCl were added to the solution of NPs.
concentration of drug was fixed whereas the volume of The resulting mixture was thoroughly mixed and kept at
silver nitrate was varied. The ratio that gave the highest ambient temperature. UV–Vis spectra were recorded after
absorption peak was selected for the synthesis of 24 h. Change in the absorption give information about the
nanoparticles. nanoparticles’ stability.

2.4 Stability of NPs 2.5 Characterization of NPs

After synthesis, the stability of NPs was tested against dif- 2.5.1 FT-IR spectroscopy
ferent pH (2–13), temperature range (25–100°C), and brine
solution (0.5–2 M). The NPs were kept at room temperature FT-IR analysis was used to detect the functional moieties
and after 24 h, UV–Vis spectra were recorded; any change present in drugs and their interaction with the metal sur-
in the intensity of absorption provides information about face in drug-loaded silver nanoparticles. IR spectra of
the stability of nanoparticles. samples were obtained by Cary630, Agilent Technologies,
USA.

2.4.1 pH stability test


2.5.2 X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis
The synthesized nanoparticles were exposed to different
pH ranges (2–14) to examine their stability in extremely Crystallographic study of AgNPs was performed by the X-
acidic, basic, and neutral conditions. The pH meter (Combo ray diffractometer (JDX-3532, JEOL, Japan) operated at the
pH/EC/TDS Testers HANNA Instrument) was used to measure voltage of 20–40 kV having 2θ range 5–80°.
the different pH (2–14) of nanoparticle solution. The acidic
and basic conditions were developed by using 0.5 M solution
of HCl and NaOH in 10 mL of silver nanoparticle solutions. 2.5.3 EDX spectroscopy
The solutions were kept for 24 h and later, the stability was
confirmed through a decrease in absorbance by the UV–Vis The compositional analysis of nanoparticles was carried
analysis. out by EDX (JSM-5910, JEOL, Japan) having 30 kV energy.
4  Aneesa Zia et al.

2.5.4 Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) Five dilutions of the test samples along with standard
were prepared and their % RSA was measured and data
The size and shape of synthesized omeprazole-loaded silver were used to find IC50 values using graphpad prism [29].
NPs were evaluated using a TEM (JEOL, Model JEM-1400)
operated at a voltage of 110 kV. Samples were prepared
for the TEM examination by coating the solution of silver 2.6.3 Antibacterial screening
nanoparticles on copper grids coated with carbon.
The antibacterial potential of drug-loaded nanoparticles
was screened against two clinically isolated bacterial strains
namely S. aureus (ATCC 6538) and E. coli (ATCC 10536) by
2.6 Biological potential of NPs agar well diffusion method. The 100 µL of bacterial suspen-
sion having a concentration of 108 CFU·mL−1 was spread on
2.6.1 Urease inhibition protocol the agar petri plate. By using cork borer four wells of equal
size of approximately 6 mm and distance were made in the
In vitro urease inhibition assay of omeprazole-loaded nano- Petri plate and 20 µL test compounds of the desired concen-
particles was performed in a 96-well plate by the Berthelot tration were added into each well along with positive con-
method with few modifications. 25 µL phosphate buffer (pH trol (Ciprofloxacin) and negative control (DMSO). The plates
7), 10 µL enzyme solution of urease, and 10 µL of test com- were incubated for 24 h at 37°C. After incubation, the zone of
pounds were added to the wells and incubated at 37°C for inhibition was measured [29].
approximately 10 min. Then, 40 µL urea solution was added
to these wells and further incubated for 10 min. Afterwards,
the constituents were pre-read using ELISA microplate 2.6.4 Statistical analysis
reader at 625 nm. Then, 45 µL phenol reagent was added
to each well followed by the addition of 70 µL alkali One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc
reagent. The incubation was continued for 10 min and Bonferroni test (Haris et al. 2023) was employed to deter-
absorbance was measured. The % inhibition was calcu- mine significant differences between the ureases and anti-
lated by using the following formula [27]. oxidant activities of different test substances at the signifi-
cance level (α = 0.05). Independent samples t-test was used
[Absorbance of test compopunds]
% Inhibition = 100 − to compare the anti-bacterial activity of two samples. The
Absorbance of control
statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20 (IBM,
× 100.
USA) computer software [30].
Five dilutions of test samples were prepared and their
% inhibitions were determined. The data obtained were
used to calculate IC50 values using a graphpad prism.
2.7 Molecular docking studies

2.6.2 Antioxidant activity A molecular operating environment (MOE) [31] was used to
investigate the binding interaction of synthesized com-
The radical scavenging potential of nanoparticles was eval- pounds with the active site of urease and xanthine oxidase.
uated by the DPPH method. The 100 mM DPPH solution was X-ray crystal structure of urease (PDB ID: 4GOA [32])
prepared in HPLC-grade methanol. 50 µL of DPPH was retrieved from the Protein Data Bank was used as a
added to the 50 µL of test compound. The mixture was starting structure for docking. Co-crystalized ligands and
incubated at room temperature for approximately half heteroatoms were removed and docking was carried out
an hour and the absorbance was measured at 517 nm using MOE software. The structures of the synthesized
[28]. The t-BHA was used as a standard throughout the compounds were drawn by using Chem Office 3D (2015)
experiment. The % scavenging activity was measured by and their energy was optimized using Gaussian 09 employing
using the following formula: the B3LYP density functional theory method with a 6-311G
[Absorbance of test compopunds] basis set [33]. Initial optimization of the protein structure
% RSA = 100 − × 100. was done using MOE software followed by molecular
Absorbance of control
docking studies. Ten of the lowest energy poses were
Omeprazole conjugation with silver nanoparticles as a urease inhibitor  5

generated for compounds. A Discovery visualizer was used


3.0
to determine the 2D and 3D models of docked compounds.
Rxn Optimization
2.5 Drug:Metal
1:1

Absorbance (a.u)
3 Results and discussion 2.0
1:2
1:3
1:4
1.5
3.1 Synthesis of nanoparticles
1.0
A solution of AgNO3 (1 mM) and omeprazole was prepared
in distilled water and methanol separately. Equal quanti-
0.5
ties of both the solutions were mixed together and kept on
stirring at room temperature. No significant color change 0.0
was observed after mixing as apparent with the naked eye. 300 400 500 600 700
After 30 min, 2–3 drops of NaBH4 were added to the reac- Wavelength (nm)
tion mixture. A change in the color from transparent to
dark brown was observed immediately after the addition Figure 2: Optimization of Omp-AgNPs.

of NaBH4 indicating the reduction of silver. The stirring


was continued for up to 4 h to allow the complete reduction their stability under the given conditions. The ratio 1:3
of silver ions for the completion of reaction. The appear- (Omp:AgNO3) corresponds to the highest absorption peak
ance of peak at 421 nm confirmed the synthesis of omepra- in UV–Vis spectra as shown in Figure 2. Further increase in
zole-loaded AgNPs. For the recovery of nanoparticles, the the concentration of salt led to a decline in the intensity of
reaction mixture was centrifuged at 8,000 rpm for approxi- absorption which confirmed the decomposition and instability
mately 30 min at room temperature and washed with dis- of nanoparticles indicating that a certain amount of salt was
tilled water twice to remove the excess ions and unreacted necessary for the optimum synthesis of NPs. The optimal ratio
drug. The UV–Vis spectrum (spectrophotometer BMS [UV- for the large-scale production of nanoparticles showing max-
1602] Canada) was recorded to confirm the formation of imum absorption in UV–Vis spectra was ratio 1:3.
nanoparticles (Figure 1).

3.5 3.3 pH stability of AgNPs


3.0 Omeprazole
Omp-AgNPs pH has a significant impact in controlling the size of nano-
2.5 particles by altering their surface charge and particle
Absorbance (a.u)

2.0

1.5 4.0
pH Effect
1.0
3.5 2-3
4-5
3.0
Transmittance (a.u)

0.5 6-7
2.5 8-9
0.0 10-11
2.0 12-13
200 300 400 500 600 700
1.5
Wavelength (nm)
1.0
Figure 1: UV–Vis spectra of Omeprazole loaded AgNPs.
0.5

0.0
3.2 Reaction optimization 300 400 500 600 700
Wavelength (nm)
The reaction mixture of Omp-AgNPs was optimized using
different drug-to-metal ratios and stored for 24 h to assess Figure 3: pH stability of AgNPs.
6  Aneesa Zia et al.

interaction [34]. The stability of synthesized Omp-AgNPs


was examined at different pH values ranging from 2 to 13 0.8 Brine Stability Test
by using 0.5 M HCl and NaOH solutions as shown in Figure 3. Omp-AgNPs
Omp-AgNPs were found to be slightly acidic in nature 0.5 M

Absorbance (a.u)
having a pH in the range of 6–7. The nanoparticles were 0.6 1M
stable at a slightly acidic, neutral and slightly basic medium. 1.5 M
2M
The red shift in the wavelength was observed at pH 4–5 due
0.4
to an increase in particle size [35]. The pH 6–7 corresponds
to the highest absorption peak in the UV–Vis spectrum indi-
cating the maximum formation and stability of nanoparti- 0.2
cles having small size. However, AgNPs were unstable at
extremely acidic and basic conditions. The chloride ions
were responsible for the destabilization of nanoparticles 0.0
300 400 500 600 700
in highly acidic conditions having pH 2–3 [36], whereas
Wavelength (nm)
instability of AgNPs in the basic medium can be associated
with the destabilization caused by sodium ions, resulting in Figure 5: Brine stability test of Omp-AgNPs.
the agglomeration of nanoparticles due to increase in par-
ticle size.
The room temperature (25°C) is the optimum temperature
for the synthesis of Omp-AgNPs.

3.4 Heat stability test of NPs


3.5 Brine stability test
The effect of heat on synthesized nanoparticles was exam-
ined at elevated temperatures to ascertain their thermal The addition of an electrolyte causes the agglomeration of
stability and optimal temperature for nanoparticle synth- nanoparticles, which makes them unstable [38]. The NaCl
esis. The AgNPs were heated at different temperatures, i.e., solutions of varying concentrations (0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 M)
25°C, 50°C, 75°C, and 100°C for 30 min and their UV–Vis were mixed with Omp-AgNPs to assess the effect of electro-
spectra were recorded. The spectra of heated NPs indicate lyte solution on synthesized nanoparticles. The absorbance
a decrease in absorption intensity with an increase in tem- of these mixtures was determined by using UV–Vis spectro-
perature confirming the destabilization of nanoparticles at meter as represented in (Figure 5). The findings indicate
high temperatures as represented in Figure 4. This instability that nanoparticles were unstable at all the concentrations
of AgNPs is associated with the dephasing of electrons [37]. of brine solution. The instability of Omp-AgNPs in the pre-
sence of NaCl is due to the aggregation effect promoted by
chloride ions [37].
1.6

1.4
Heat Effect
1.2 Room Temperature 3.6 FT-IR spectroscopy
Absorbance (a.u)

50°C
1.0 75°C The FT-IR spectra of omeprazole and Omp-AgNPs were
0.8 100°C compared to identify the functional groups involved in
the interaction with silver metal. The peak observed at
0.6
3,057 cm−1 corresponds to aromatic C–H, the absorption
0.4 band for stretching vibration of C]N was observed at
0.2 1,626 cm−1, the band at 1,406 cm−1 is due to the CH bending,
the peak at 1,205 cm−1 corresponds to the stretching of alkyl
aryl ether, and the strong absorption peak at 1,012 cm−1 is
0.0
300 400 500 600 700
Wavelength (nm) assigned to the S]O stretching [39]. A decrease in the
intensity and shift in absorption position of bands corre-
Figure 4: Heat stability test of NPs. sponding to C]N, OCH3, and S]O in the spectra of
Omeprazole conjugation with silver nanoparticles as a urease inhibitor  7

100 nanoparticles (Omp-AgNPs) indicates the involvement of


Omp-AgNPs
90 Omeprazole these groups in bonding with silver. The FT-IR spectra of
omeprazole and Omp-AgNPs are represented in Figure 6.
80
1613
The mechanism of omeprazole’s interaction with AgNPs is
Transmittance (%)

70 1379 1152
presented in Figure 7. S]O and C]N groups of omepra-
1005
zole are involved in the structural stabilization of AgNPs
60
(Table 1).
50

40 1626
C=N
30 1406
C-H 3.7 XRD analysis
20 1205
OCH3
10 1012,S=O The phase, crystal structure, and crystallite size of synthe-
4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 sized nanoparticles were examined by XRD analysis. The
Wavenumber (cm-1) XRD spectrum of Omp-AgNPs showed diffraction peaks at
38.05, 44.04, 64.37, and 77.36° [40]. These peaks correspond
Figure 6: FT-IR spectra of omeprazole-loaded AgNPs.
to the (111), (200), (220), and (311) planes of cubic crystal
lattice (correlated to ICSD file # 064994). The average par-
ticle size of nanocrystal calculated using Debye Scherrer
O equation was found to be 17 nm (Figure 8).
H
O N
S N
N O
3.8 EDX spectroscopy

The elemental composition of chemically synthesized drug


loaded AgNPs was examined by EDX analysis. EDX profile
Ag of Omp-AgNPs displayed a very strong signal in silver
region which confirms the formation of omeprazole-loaded
AgNPs. The optical absorption peak for the nanocrystals of
metallic silver (72.97 wt%) was observed at about 3 keV due

N O
S N
90
O N
H
80
O Omp-AgNPs
70
Figure 7: Mechanism of the interaction between AgNPs and omeprazole.
Intensity (a.u)

60
(111)
50

Table 1: FT-IR data of omeprazole and Omp-AgNPs 40


(200)
(220) (311)
30
Omeprazole Omp-AgNPs
20
Frequency Allocated Frequency Allocated
(cm−1) groups (cm−1) groups 10
1,626 C]N 1,613 C]N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
1,406 C–H 1,379 C–H
1,205 OCH3 1,152 OCH3
2T (degree)
1,012 S]O 1,005 S]O
Figure 8: XRD pattern of Omp-AgNPs.
8  Aneesa Zia et al.

Figure 9: EDX profile of Omp-AgNPs.

to SPR as shown in Figure 9. The additional peaks at 0.25, 0.5, spherical in shape. The particle size of AgNPs was calcu-
and 2.3 are the characteristic signals for carbon, oxygen, and lated using ImageJ software. The size of nanoparticles was
sulfur, respectively. The presence of these peaks in the spec- in the range of 12–24 nm with an average particle size of
trum of nanoparticles confirmed the presence of omepra- 17 nm (Figure 11). Results obtained from the TEM are in
zole moiety bound on the surface of AgNPs. agreement with XRD.

3.9 TEM 3.10 Urease inhibition assay

The shape and particle size of omeprazole-loaded silver The Omp-AgNPs were evaluated for in vitro urease inhibi-
nanoparticles were determined by TEM analysis as shown tion potential to examine their activity against enzyme
in Figure 10. TEM image was recorded at different magni- urease by following standard protocol. The formulation
fications of 50 and 100 nm. The Omp-AgNPs were polydis- of omeprazole in the form of nanoparticles significantly
persed agglomerates, small in size, and predominantly enhanced its inhibitory potential against enzyme urease

Figure 10: TEM image of synthesized Omp-AgNPs at different magnifications of 50 and 100 nm.
Omeprazole conjugation with silver nanoparticles as a urease inhibitor  9

Average Particle Size 17 nm Table 3: Antioxidant potential of Omp-AgNPs


3.0

Sample % RSA ± SD (500 µg·mL−1) IC50 ± SEM (µg·mL−1)


2.5
Omeprazole 72.21 ± 1.67a 18.7 ± 0.17
2.0 Omp-AgNPs 84.45 ± 2.16b 5.28 ± 0.14
t-BHA 89.56 ± 2.31c 58.76 ± 0.45
Count

1.5
Different small letters represent significant differences (ANOVA post hoc
Tukey test, P < 0.05) between the anti-oxidant activities of different
1.0 samples. SEM stands for standard error of the mean where n = 5.

0.5
by the degree of discoloration [29]. The results showed
0.0 higher scavenging activity for nanoparticles as compared
12 14 16 18 20 22 24
to omeprazole as shown in Table 3. % RSA of omeprazole
Particle Size Distribution(nm) was 72.21% whereas AgNPs were 84.45%. The IC50 value of
omeprazole is 18.7 ± 0.17 while that of Omp-AgNPs is 5.28 ±
Figure 11: Particle size distribution graph of Omp-AgNPs.
0.14 which is less than omeprazole. This shows that nano-
particles are more effective as compared to omeprazole.
Tertiary butylated hydroxy anisole (t-BHA) used as a refer-
Table 2: Urease inhibition assay of omeprazole and Omp-AgNPs
ence showed 89.56% RSA with an IC50 value of 58.76 ± 0.45.

Sample %Inhibition ± SD IC50 ± SEM (µg·mL−1)

Omeprazole 69.45 ± 1.24a 4.05 ± 0.15


Omp-AgNPs 80.23 ± 1.06b 2.17 ± 0.10
3.12 Antibacterial activity
Thiourea 93.30 ± 1.24c 18.10 ± 0.22
The antibacterial potential of omeprazole and its nanopar-
Different small letters represent significant differences (ANOVA post hoc ticles (Omp-AgNPs) was evaluated against two bacterial
Tukey test, P < 0.05) between the urease inhibition activity of different
pathogens (e.g., S. aureus and E. coli) as shown in Table 4.
substances. SEM stands for standard error of the mean where n = 5.
The results revealed that omeprazole is ineffective against
both the strains at conc. of 1 mg·mL−1 with no zone of inhibi-
as compared to drug alone (Table 2). The percent inhibition tion as shown in Figures 12 and 13. The omeprazole-loaded
of nanoparticles was 80.23% while that of omeprazole is AgNPs showed immense antibacterial activity as compared
69.45%, and IC50 values for Omp-AgNPs and omeprazole to drug. AgNPs were more effective against E. coli with
are 2.17 ± 0.10 and 4.02 ± 0.15 respectively, which shows 13.6 mm ± 1.02 zone of inhibition, whereas zone of inhibition
nanoparticles are highly active against urease. Thiourea against S. aureus was 12 mm ± 0.41. The results indicate that
was used as a standard inhibitor of urease during the AgNPs can be a substitute for antibacterial agents as com-
experiment. It showed 93.3% inhibition of enzyme with pared to drugs.
an IC50 value of 18.1 ± 0.22.

Table 4: Antibacterial assay of omeprazole and Omp-AgNPs


3.11 Antioxidant activity
Sr. no. Conc. (1 mg·mL−1) Zone of inhibition (mm) ± SD
The radical scavenging potential of omeprazole and its
nanoparticles was performed by the DPPH method. The S. aureus E. coli
development of antioxidants for the treatment of oxidative 1. Omeprazole NA NA
stress-related disorders has been promoted by extensive 2. Omp-AgNPs 12.5 ± 0.41a 13.5 ± 1.02a
research on the protective role of antioxidants against 3. Ciprofloxacin 19.5 ± 1.50b 18.4 ± 0.86b
these disorders [41]. Antioxidants react with DPPH and
In the above table, NA stands for “not active”. Different small letters
convert it into diphenylpicrylhydrazine (DPPH-H) due to represent significant differences (t-test, P < 0.001) when data are com-
its hydrogen and electron-accepting capability. The radical pared within the column. SD stands for “Standard Deviation” where
scavenging potentials of the antioxidant can be determined n = 5.
10  Aneesa Zia et al.

Antibacterial Activity
Staphylococcus aureus Escherichia coli
25
20
15
10
5
0
Omeprazole Omp-AgNPs Ciprofloxacin

Figure 12: Antibacterial activity of omeprazole and Omp-AgNPs.

3.13 Hotspot mapping of active pocket

The crystal structure of urease reveals various key resi-


dues that are involved in the binding pocket and allow
the inhibitor to retain within the active site. These includes
Ni–metal atom, sheet S23 (residues 403–409 color-coded
Figure 14: 3D interaction mapping of active site residues of urease.
yellow) a small loop L30 (410–412 color coded blue), helix

Figure 13: Antibacterial assay of omeprazole and its AgNPs.


Omeprazole conjugation with silver nanoparticles as a urease inhibitor  11

Figure 15: Interaction of nanoparticles in the active site of urease.

H14 (435–441 color coded brown), loop L37 (444–454 color- and weight percent of AgNPs were studied by EDX analysis.
coded red), helix H20 (580–593 color-coded green), loop L39 Silver was present as a major constituent in omeprazole-
(594–598 color-coded cyan), helix H21 (599–610 color-coded loaded silver nanoparticles. The TEM analysis revealed that
pink), and a loop L41 (632–638 color-coded orange) (Figure 14). Omp-AgNPs were spherical in shape having the particle size in
The complex of omeprazole interacts with the active the range of 16–20 nm. The antibacterial potential of nanopar-
site along with the binding energy of −7.76 kcal·mol−1. It ticles was evaluated against two bacterial strains namely
binds into the active site of the protein by the interaction S. aureus and E. coli by agar well diffusion method and NPs
of Ni–metal to form a complex with the oxygen atom of the showed significant activity against both the strains as com-
omeprazole complex. Hydrogen bond interactions were pared to omeprazole. The DPPH assay was used to evaluate
observed between the complex and His492, CME592, ASP633, the antioxidant potential of nanoparticles, % RSA of Omp-
Ala636, Glu525, His594, and His593 amino acid residues. AgNPs is 84.45%, which is 1.16 times higher than omeprazole.
Asp494 interacts through pi–sulfur interaction with the Urease inhibition of nanoparticles was determined by fol-
complex. Some pi–alkyl and pi–pi interactions were observed lowing standard protocol. The Omp-AgNPs showed 80.23%
between the complex for the retention of the complex mole- inhibition against urease which is 1.15 times higher as com-
cule in the active pocket of the urease (Figure 15). pared to omeprazole. The silver nanoparticles have shown
considerable potency when compared to the original drug.
Further optimization of the synthesized nanoparticles may
4 Conclusion lead toward even better results which may lead toward the
initiation of preclinical trials on the synthesized nanoparticles.
The chemical approach is one of the simple, fast, low-cost, Furthermore, conducting the toxicity studies of synthesized
and effective approaches for the synthesis of nanoparticles. products adds to the future perspective of this project. It can
Omeprazole-loaded AgNPs were synthesized by using a safely be said that the urease inhibition potential of Omp-
chemical method. Characterization of NPs was done by AgNPs signifies them as potential lead compounds for the
advanced analytical techniques including UV–Vis, FT-IR, development of relevant therapies to address damages caused
EDX, XRD, and TEM analysis. The FT-IR studies confirmed by H. pylori in clinically sick patients.
that S]O, C]N, and OCH3 groups of omeprazole are
responsible for the stabilization of silver nanoparticles. Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank the
XRD studies revealed that nanoparticles were crystalline in University of Nizwa for the generous support of this project.
nature with cubic crystal structure. Elemental composition We thank the analytical and technical staff for assistance.
12  Aneesa Zia et al.

This study was funded by the Deputyship for Research and [8] Beiranvand M. A review of the most common in vivo models of
Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia (Project stomach ulcers and natural and synthetic anti-ulcer compounds: a
number ISP23-81). comparative systematic study. Phytomed Plus. 2022;2:2615–30.
[9] Lindberg P, Brändström A, Wallmark B. Structure—activity rela-
tionships of omeprazole analogues and their mechanism of action.
Funding information: This study was funded by the Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1987;8:399–402.
Deputyship for Research and Innovation, Ministry of [10] Clissold SP, Campoli-Richards DM. Omeprazole: a preliminary
Education in Saudi Arabia (Project number ISP23-81). review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties,
Funding was provided by the Research Council through and therapeutic potential in peptic ulcer disease and Zollinger-
Ellison syndrome. Drugs. 1986;32:15–47.
the Research Grant Program (BFP/RGP/HSS/23/037).
[11] Olbe L, Carlsson E, Lindberg P. A proton-pump inhibitor expedition:
the case histories of omeprazole and esomeprazole. Nat Rev Drug
Author contributions: Aneesa Zia and Ayesha Shahzad: Discovery. 2003;2:132–9.
methodology, formal analysis, writing – original draft; [12] Yim D-S, Jeong JE, Park JY. Assay of omeprazole and omeprazole
Nadia Riaz and Sara Khan: software, data curation, writing sulfone by semi-microcolumn liquid chromatography with mixed-
function precolumn. J Chromatogr B: Biomed Sci Appl.
– original draft; Umar Farooq and Syed Majid Bukhari:
2001;754:487–93.
investigation, resources; Asaad Khalid: resources, visuali-
[13] Shah N, Gossman W. Omeprazole. In: StatPearls [Internet].
zation, data curation, funding acquisition; Hamdy Kashtoh: Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2019.
writing – review and editing, resources, funding acquisi- [14] Bendas ER, Abdelbary AA. Instantaneous enteric nano-encapsula-
tion; Rizwana Sarwar, Ajmal Khan, and Ahmed Al-Harrasi: tion of omeprazole: pharmaceutical and pharmacological evalua-
conceptualization, writing – original draft. writing – review tion. Int J Pharm. 2014;468:97–104.
[15] Pinzauti S, Gratteri P, Furlanetto S, Mura P, Dreassi E, Phan-Tan-Luu R.
and editing, supervision, funding acquisition.
Experimental design in the development of voltammetric method for
the assay of omeprazole. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1996;14:881–9.
Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest. [16] Ramteke S, Jain NK. Clarithromycin-and omeprazole-containing
gliadin nanoparticles for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori.
Data availability statement: All data generated or ana- J Drug Target. 2008;16:65–72.
lyzed during this study are included in this published [17] Rezazadeh M, Safaran R, Minaiyan M, Mostafavi A. Preparation and
characterization of Eudragit L 100-55/chitosan enteric nanoparti-
article.
cles containing omeprazole using general factorial design: In vitro/
in vivo study. Res Pharm Sci. 2021;16:358.
[18] Li L, Jing J, Yang S, Fang S, Liu W, Wang C, et al. Bletilla striata
polysaccharide nanoparticles improved the therapeutic efficacy of
References omeprazole on the rat gastric ulcer induced by ethanol. Mol
Pharm. 2023;20:1996–2008.
[1] Khatibi A, Zahedi P, Ghourchian H, Lari AS. Development of [19] Diefenthaeler HS, Bianchin MD, Marques MS, Nonnenmacher JL,
microfluidic-based cellulose acetate phthalate nanoparticles con- Bender ET, Bender JG, et al. Omeprazole nanoparticles suspension:
taining omeprazole for antiulcer activity: In vitro and in vivo eva- Development of a stable liquid formulation with a view to pediatric
luations. Eur Polym J. 2021;147:110294. administration. Int J Pharm. 2020;589:119818.
[2] Ebada SS, Al-Jawabri NA, Youssef FS, Albohy A, Aldalaien SEM, [20] Ravindran A, Chandran P, Khan SS. Biofunctionalized silver nano-
Disi AM, et al. In vivo antiulcer activity, phytochemical exploration, particles: advances and prospects. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces.
and molecular modelling of the polyphenolic-rich fraction of Crepis 2013;105:342–52.
sancta extract. Inflammopharmacology. 2020;28:321–31. [21] Mandava K. Biological and non-biological synthesis of metallic
[3] Dharmani P, Palit G. Exploring Indian medicinal plants for antiulcer nanoparticles: Scope for current pharmaceutical research. Indian J
activity. Indian J Pharmacol. 2006;38:95. Pharm Sci. 2017;79:501–12.
[4] Ajeigbe K, Onifade A, Omotoso D, Enitan S, Olaleye S. Anti-ulcero- [22] Gherasim O, Puiu RA, Bîrcă AC, Burdușel A-C, Grumezescu AM. An
genic activity of Aspilia africana leaf extract: roles of gastric acid, updated review on silver nanoparticles in biomedicine.
oxidative stress and neutrophil infiltration. Afr J Biomed Res. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:2318.
2014;17:193–201. [23] Sreelakshmy V, Deepa M, Mridula P. Green synthesis of silver
[5] Sashidhara KV, Avula SR, Mishra V, Palnati GR, Singh LR, Singh N, nanoparticles from Glycyrrhiza glabra root extract for the treat-
et al. Identification of quinoline-chalcone hybrids as potential ment of gastric ulcer. J Dev Drugs. 2016;5:2.
antiulcer agents. Eur J Med Chem. 2015;89:638–53. [24] Amin M, Anwar F, Janjua MRSA, Iqbal MA, Rashid U. Green synth-
[6] Safari S, Bahramikia S, Dezfoulian O. Silver nanoparticles synthe- esis of silver nanoparticles through reduction with Solanum
sized from Quercus brantii ameliorated ethanol-induced gastric xanthocarpum L. berry extract: Characterization, antimicrobial and
ulcers in rats by decreasing oxidative stress and improving anti- urease inhibitory activities against Helicobacter pylori. Int J Mol Sci.
oxidant systems. Inflammopharmacology. 2023;31:1–16. 2012;13:9923–41.
[7] Ahmad Bhat M, Al-Omar MA, Naglah AM. Synthesis and in vivo anti- [25] Menaga S, Kripa K, Sangeetha R. Evaluation of in vitro inhibition of
ulcer evaluation of some novel piperidine linked dihydropyrimidi- proton-pump by nanosilver particles synthesized using seeds of
none derivatives. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2018;33:978–88. Anethum graveolens. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2017;10:363–6.
Omeprazole conjugation with silver nanoparticles as a urease inhibitor  13

[26] Farooq U, Ahmad T, Khan A, Sarwar R, Shafiq J, Raza Y, et al. [35] Sreelekha E, George B, Shyam A, Sajina N, Mathew B. A compara-
Rifampicin conjugated silver nanoparticles: A new arena for tive study on the synthesis, characterization, and antioxidant
development of antibiofilm potential against methicillin resistant activity of green and chemically synthesized silver nanoparticles.
Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Int J Nanomed. BioNanoScience. 2021;11:489–96.
2019;3983–93. [36] Muhammad SP, Shah MR, Ullah R, Ahmad I, Ali K. Synthesis and
[27] Khan MU, Aslam M, Shahzad SA, Khan ZA, Khan NA, Ali M, et al. characterization of functionalized silver nanoparticles for
Design and synthesis of thiobarbituric acid analogues as potent selective screening of mercury (II) ions. Arab J Sci Eng.
urease inhibitors. J Mol Struct. 2021;1231:129959. 2022;47:7135–45.
[28] Chien P-J, Sheu F, Huang W-T, Su M-S. Effect of molecular weight of [37] Ahmad T, Mahbood F, Sarwar R, Iqbal A, Khan M, Muhammad S,
chitosans on their antioxidative activities in apple juice. Food et al. Synthesis of gemifloxacin conjugated silver nanoparticles,
Chem. 2007;102:1192–8. their amplified bacterial efficacy against human pathogen and
[29] Sarwar R, Farooq U, Khan A, Naz S, Khan S, Khan A, et al. Evaluation their morphological study via TEM analysis. Artif Cells Nanomed
of antioxidant, free radical scavenging, and antimicrobial activity of Biotechnol. 2021;49:661–71.
Quercus incana Roxb. Front Pharmacol. 2015;6:277. [38] Ullah I, Ali I, Ullah S, Khan A, Imran M, Shah M, et al. Synthesis of
[30] Haris A, Azeem M, Abbas MG, Mumtaz M, Mozūratis R, acyclovir stabilized silver nanoparticles for selective recognition of
Binyameen M. Prolonged repellent activity of plant essential oils Hg 2 + in different media. Int J Environ Sci Technol (Tehran).
against dengue vector, Aedes aegypti. Molecules. 2023;28:1351. 2022;19:1–12.
[31] Vilar S, Cozza G, Moro S. Medicinal chemistry and the molecular [39] Chandarana CV, Kapupara PP. Fourier transform infrared spectro-
operating environment (MOE): Application of QSAR and molecular photometry: An eco-friendly green tool for simultaneous quantifi-
docking to drug discovery. Curr Top Med Chem. 2008;8:1555–72. cation of aspirin and omeprazole in pharmaceutical formulation.
[32] Farooq U, Khan S, Naz S, Wani TA, Bukhari SM, Aborode AT, et al. Braz J Anal Chem. 2020;7:70–8.
Three new acrylic acid derivatives from Achillea mellifolium as [40] Khan A, Jabeen H, Ahmad T, Rehman NU, Khan SS, Shareef H, et al.
potential inhibitors of urease from jack bean and α-glucosidase Comparative efficacy of cephradine-loaded silver and gold nano-
from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecules. 2022;27:5004. particles against resistant human pathogens. Artif Cells Nanomed
[33] Frisch A. gaussian 09W Reference. Vol. 470. Wallingford, USA: 2009. Biotechnol. 2022;50:312–21.
p. 25. [41] Nie Z, Liu KJ, Zhong C-J, Wang L-F, Yang Y, Tian Q, et al. Enhanced
[34] Sarwar R, Farooq U, Raza Shah M, Khan S, Riaz N, Naz S, et al. Rapid radical scavenging activity by antioxidant-functionalized gold
synthesis of gold nanoparticles from quercus incana and their anti- nanoparticles: A novel inspiration for development of new artificial
microbial potential against human pathogens. Appl Sci. 2017;7:29. antioxidants. Free Radic Biol Med. 2007;43:1243–54.

You might also like