Part II: INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PERSONALITY 1922; 7 judges also agreed that the union would be
contrary to Art. 88 of the Treaty of Saint Germain.
A. legal persons 1. states The union does not violate Austrian independence, however it is incompatible with the Protocol requirements for statehood By the Treaty of Saint-Germain and by Protocol No. I of The Austro-German Customs Union Case 1922, Austria agreed to conclude a treaty with a view to establishing a customs union regime. The Court held that FACTS: There was a request for an opinion on the such a regime would not be compatible with Protocol meaning of “independence” from the Council of the No. I of 1922. League of Nations of the Art. 88 of the Treaty of St. Germain which stipulated that Germany and Austria The Treaty of Saint-Germain must be understood to must remain independent except with the consent of the mean the continued existence of Austria within her League of Nations. The Protocol No. 1 of Geneva 1922 present frontiers as a separate State with sole right of stipulated similar conditions. Austria and Germany were decision in all matters economics, political, financial or attempting to establish free trade customs unions. other with the result that independence is violated, as soon as there is any violation thereof, either in the The Court was asked by the Council for an opinion as to economic, political or any other field, these different whether a regime established between Germany and aspect of independence being in practice is one and Austria on the basis and within the limits of the indivisible. principles laid down in the Protocol of Vienna of March 19th, 1931, between Germany and Austria would be Compared to dependent States which are subject to the compatible with Article 88 of the Treaty of Saint-Germain authority of the superior State’s restriction on a State’s and with Protocol No. I signed at Geneva on October 4 th, liberty following from International Law or contracted 1922. In accordance with the usual practice , States engagement do not affect its independence. parties to any one of these instruments were informed that the Court was prepared to receive written Dependent States are subject to the authority of one or statements and hear oral arguments, if they desired. The more States where there is no relationship of superiority German, Austrian, French, Italian and Czechoslovak and subordination, it is impossible to speak of Governments availed themselves of this invitation. dependence within the meaning of international law. It follows that the legal conception of independence has Austria and Germany reached a preliminary agreement nothing to do with a State’s subordination to on a customs union provided by a Protocol of 1931, international law or with the numerous and constantly which publicly was seen as a disturbance in international increasing States of De Facto dependence which relations. characterize the relation of one country to other countries. Austria and Germany sought to create a customs union establishing free trade between States. Austria was a Independence refers to the legal independence of a party to the Treaty of Saint-Germain 1919 which State to act as sovereign within its borders. provided that Austria undertakes to abstain from act which might directly or indirectly or by any means Separate Opinion Judge Anzilotti whatever compromise her independence. Austria was Judge Anzilotti believes the Austro-German Customs also a party to a Protocol of 1922 concerning economic Union would violate Article 88 of the Treaty of Saint- independence to the effect. Germain, requiring Austria to seek League of ISSUE: The question before the PCIJ was whether Austria Nations Council consent before proceeding. He would be acting contrary to the provisions of Saint- argues that while the Union wouldn't formally German Treaty (1919) and the Protocol No. 1 signed in eliminate Austria's independence, it could endanger Geneva in 1922, in respect of Austrian’s economic it by strengthening economic ties with Germany and independence. Both agreements contained an obligation potentially pushing Austria towards political unity. upon Austria to abstain from any act which might He concludes that the Union is incompatible with compromise her independence. Article 88 and the Geneva Protocol, requiring Austria RULING: Yes. The Court advised by 8 votes to 7, that the to seek Council approval. customs union would be incompatible with the Protocol