Professional Documents
Culture Documents
deocument_462Full download book Nontraditional Activation Methods In Green And Sustainable Applications Microwaves Ultrasounds Photo Electro And Mechanochemistry And High Advances In Green And Sustainable Chemistry Ebo pdf
deocument_462Full download book Nontraditional Activation Methods In Green And Sustainable Applications Microwaves Ultrasounds Photo Electro And Mechanochemistry And High Advances In Green And Sustainable Chemistry Ebo pdf
NONTRADITIONAL
ACTIVATION METHODS IN
GREEN AND SUSTAINABLE
APPLICATIONS
Microwaves; Ultrasounds; Photo-,
Electro- and Mechanochemistry and
High Hydrostatic Pressure
Series Editor
€ OK
TOR
BELA €
Professor, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA,
United States
€
CHRISTIAN SCHAFER
Lecturer, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA,
United States
Elsevier
Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands
The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United Kingdom
50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the
Publisher (other than as may be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience
broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical
treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating
and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such
information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including
parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume
any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability,
negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas
contained in the material herein.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN: 978-0-12-819009-8
Ricardo Belloso
Department of Chemistry, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, United States
Clarence Charnay
ICGM, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, ENSCM, Montpellier, France
Pedro Cintas
Department of Organic and Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences and IACYS-Green Chemistry
and Sustainable Development Unit, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
Evelina Colacino
ICGM, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, ENSCM, Montpellier, France
Giancarlo Cravotto
Department of Drug Science and Technology, and NIS-Centre for Nanostructured Interfaces and Surfaces,
University of Turin, Turin, Italy
Francesco Delogu
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica, Chimica, e dei Materiali, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, Cagliari,
Italy
Franziska Emmerling
BAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Berlin, Germany
Satoshi Fujii
Department of Information and Communication System Engineering, Okinawa College, Okinawa, Japan
Aharon Gedanken
Department of Chemistry, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
Allen Gordon
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, United States
Norbert Hoffmann
CNRS, Universite de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, ICMR, Equipe de Photochimie, UFR Sciences,
Reims, France
István Jablonkai
MTA TTK Lendület Functional Organic Materials Research Group, Institute of Organic Chemistry, Research
Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
Anke Kabelitz
BAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Berlin, Germany
Attila Kunfi
MTA TTK Lendület Functional Organic Materials Research Group, Institute of Organic Chemistry, Research
Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
Shainaz Landge
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, United States
Corentin Lefebvre
CNRS, Universite de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, ICMR, Equipe de Photochimie, UFR Sciences,
Reims, France
xi
xii Contributors
Gábor London
MTA TTK Lendület Functional Organic Materials Research Group, Institute of Organic Chemistry, Research
Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
Katia Martina
Department of Drug Science and Technology, and NIS-Centre for Nanostructured Interfaces and Surfaces,
University of Turin, Turin, Italy
Manisha Mishra
Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, United States
Tara Mooney
Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, United States
Bilal Nişancı
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Atat€
urk University, Erzurum, Turkey
István Pálinkó
University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
Andrea Porcheddu
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, Cittadella Universitaria,
Monserrato, CA, Italy
Da-Hui Qu
Key Laboratory for Advanced Materials, School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, East China
University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
Christian Sch€afer
Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, United States
Abid Shaikh
Department of Chemistry, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, United States
Pál Sipos
University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
Márton Szabados
University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
Bela T€
or€
ok
Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, United States
Shuntaro Tsubaki
School of Materials and Chemical Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan
Gábor Varga
University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
Contributors xiii
Yuji Wada
Institute of Innovation Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama; Microwave Chemical Co. Ltd.,
Techno Alliance 3F, Suita, Osaka, Japan
Kazutaka Yamamoto
Head of Laboratory, Food Process Engineering, Division of Food Processing and Distribution, Food Research
Institute, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
CHAPTER ONE
Application of nontraditional
activation methods in green and
sustainable chemistry:
Microwaves, ultrasounds, electro-,
photo-, and mechanochemistry,
and high hydrostatic pressure
Christian Sch€ la To
afer and Be € ro
€k
Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, United States
1 Introduction
Many discoveries made in chemistry in the 20th century enabled
strong developments in the preparation of a broad range of products. The
developing chemical industry was mostly based on petroleum resources that
provided a steady flow of raw materials. The continuous development of
new fields such as medicinal chemistry, polymers and plastics, agrochemi-
cals, and the likes resulted in booming industrial production. Although
the new products had a largely positive impact on the society as a whole,
several unintended issues began to appear. These included industrial disas-
ters, drug side effects, and the damage caused to Earth’s protective ozone
layer among many others. These incidents made the society realize the
potential harmful effects of large-scale production and the associated waste
produced by it, some products themselves, and the inability of these products
to decompose at the end of their lifecycle. In addition, the extensive use of
fossil fuels for energy production and petroleum derivatives for industrial
feedstock resulted in issues that can further threaten the planet’s ecosystem.
While there have been corrective measures implemented along the way in
the forms of government regulations, a concentrated effort in the late 1990s
resulted in the birth of the Green Chemistry movement1 to address the fun-
damental nature of the problems. In fact, the current efforts often appear to
be joint ventures by government, academia, and industry suggesting a much
Nontraditional Activation Methods in Green and Sustainable Applications © 2021 Elsevier Inc. 1
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819009-8.00016-5 All rights reserved.
2 Christian Sch€afer and Bela T€
or€
ok
more effective tackling of the problems than when these entities were
actively working against each other delaying the development of actual solu-
tions. This ongoing partnership ensures the continuous expansion and
advancement of environmentally friendly processes and products,2–4 and
green chemistry and environmental science made steady developments in
the general science education as well.5–7 There are many ways chemistry
can contribute to these advances, replacing old outdated chemical processes
with ones having less environmental impact, traditional petroleum based
raw materials with sustainable ones, or notoriously stable conventional plas-
tics and other chemicals with biodegradable alternatives.
This introductory chapter and the entire book focus on a special tool set
that is a great contributor to the development of green synthetic methods;
the so-called nontraditional activation methods that use alternative energy
forms to conventional convective heating to initiate chemical reactions.
A large majority of chemical reactions require activation energy in order
to occur. Traditionally this energy was introduced to a reaction as heat
mostly via convective heating using an external heat source. Although effec-
tive, convective heating is slow and essentially dependent on heat diffusion
(mixing) in the system. Another problem is that the temperature of the wall
of the reaction vessel is commonly 10–20°C higher than that in the center of
the liquid, often causing side reactions or decomposition on or around the
surface of the wall. To alleviate these issues, several nontraditional activation
methods have been developed. Although different in nature, the common
feature of these methods is that they are based on the direct energy transfer in
the reaction mixture. In this chapter, we will only attempt to describe the
basic features of these methods, such as microwave- and ultrasonic irradia-
tion, photo-, electro- and mechanochemistry and high hydrostatic pressure
with a few representative examples, which will be followed by state-of-the-
art specific applications in the upcoming chapters.
3 Ultrasonic activation
The application of ultrasounds in chemical synthesis has a nearly
100 years old history.31 The first application dates back to 1927,32, 33 with
the early mechanistic theories appearing in 1945.34 The widespread use of
the technique began in around 1980s when the dedicated reliable instru-
ments appeared on the market. The medical applications such as noninvasive
diagnostics further initiated the instrument design and by the 1990s ultra-
sonic activation became a mainstream technique in biology and chemistry
laboratories, with several industrial applications.35, 36 Sonochemistry is a
significant contributor to green synthesis design as well.37–42
The frequency range of ultrasounds is beyond that of the human hearing,
which ranges from 16 Hz to 18 kHz. It is a broad range with different uses.
The most common frequency span for the synthetic use of ultrasounds
is between 20 and 100 kHz, also known as power ultrasounds.43
The 100 kHz–2 MHz region is commonly referred to as high frequency
Application of nontraditional activation methods 7
Ultrasounds have also been used for the reduction of various compounds
using the aluminum-water system as the hydrogen source.54, 55 As an exam-
ple, the selective reduction of one of the aromatic rings in naphthalene is
shown in Scheme 8.56 The reduction reactions are performed for a variety
of CdC and C-heteroatom bonds under environmentally friendly condi-
tions and give the desired products in high yields and selectivities using a
simple experimental setup.
4 Photochemical activation
The initiation of chemical reactions by light, commonly known as
photochemical activation is one of the oldest, most established non-
traditional activation methods.57 The first photochemical reaction was
reported in the early 1900s when Ciamician found that sunlight could ini-
tiate chemical reactions.58 As the early light source in photochemistry, the
solar energy provided essentially unlimited and rather broad-spectrum radi-
ation that was used to initiate a number of early photochemical reactions.59
The solar spectrum covers a wide range of wavelengths, from the ultraviolet,
visible to the infrared region.60 Later, the basic rules of photochemical acti-
vation that drive the development of new processes were established.61 The
theoretical basis of the photochemical activation is the same as it was with the
previous methods; in order to activate a reaction, at least one component of
the system must absorb the light also known as the first law of photochem-
istry (Grotthuss-Draper law).62 The law of photoequivalence, which is
based on the dual wave/particle nature of light, establishes that each
photon that is absorbed in a chemical system can activate one molecule only
10 Christian Sch€afer and Bela T€
or€
ok
(Stark-Einstein law).63 Extensive efforts have been made to describe the effi-
ciency of photochemical processes. The primary efficiency is described by
quantum yield (Φ) that is the ratio of the absorbed photons that initiate change
vs all absorbed photons. Depending on the process, Φ can be calculated by
many observed variables, such as emitted light (fluorescence) or decomposed
molecules (in a decomposition reaction), etc. In theory, when every absorbed
photon generates a change Φ ¼ 1, any case when Φ < 1 indicates that at least
part of the absorbed photons was wasted. In real systems, however, the
quantum yield could also be higher than one, sometimes even up to a million.
This suggests that the absorption of a single photon initiates a chain reaction
that can produce a larger number of product molecules. The simplest example
for this phenomenon is the chlorination of methane. In practical photochem-
ical syntheses, the light source is limited to ultraviolet (UV) and/or visible
(Vis) lamps. This determines that at least one component of a system (substrate,
solvent, catalyst, etc.) must be able to absorb UV-Vis light.
The major goal of green and sustainable chemistry is to reduce the envi-
ronmental impact of a process. From this point of view, photochemical acti-
vation possesses several advantages. The energy is introduced to the reaction
mixture in the form of photons that are the cleanest reagents (in addition to
electrons, see electrochemical activation, vide infra). Although side reactions
can occur, photons themselves will not generate any waste.64 In addition,
the appropriate selection of photons with specific energy will only activate
the corresponding chemical bonds, thus carefully designed photochemical
reactions mostly occur with high chemoselectivity.65 Furthermore, these
reactions do not require conductive heating and commonly occur at room
temperature (or lower). Therefore, thermal processes that potentially can
generate isomeric or by-products, especially in stereoselective reactions,
are less of a factor in photochemical processes, which often result in exclu-
sive stereoselectivity.66
Although based on the above, photochemical activation has several
advantages from the green chemistry point of view, it does have disadvan-
tages as well. One such issue is the scale-up of photochemical processes that
is difficult to do at the industrial level. One of the major issues is the signif-
icant loss of energy that is due to multiple reasons;67 (i) ineffective photon
absorption (e.g., luminescence), (ii) the wall of the reactor if transparent,
(iii) most light sources have a broad spectrum while the absorption occurs
at a specific wavelength, resulting in often over 50% loss. Another serious
issue is the limited penetration depth of the light68 as already discussed with
microwaves. As a potential solution, large reaction vessels are set up with
Application of nontraditional activation methods 11
multiple light sources, which make the reactor design complicated and
expensive. In addition, none of the light sources has 100% efficiency, thus
they generate considerable heat as well. Working with often low boiling,
flammable solvents, this represents a safety issue and the system may require
continuous cooling especially when immersion lamps are used.69 Although
these shortcomings somewhat limit the application of photochemical acti-
vation, it is still widely used in a plethora of organic synthesis protocols.
In fact, it is the best way to proceed with many radical and pericyclic reac-
tions and for substrates with electron-rich double bonds that can be excited
by UV or visible light (alkenes, dienes, and carbonyl compounds).70
One of the most recent exciting new applications in organic synthesis is
in photochemistry, namely photocatalysis that attracted great attention.71 In
these processes, an originally inactive material (procatalyst) is activated by
light and becomes a viable catalyst for different processes. This concept
may contribute to solving several of the problems outlined above and holds
significant promise for the development of potential green technologies.
Several applications are listed below.
Beeler et al. showed that the [2 + 2] cycloaddition, a typical photochem-
ical reaction, can be performed under stereo-controlled conditions using an
organocatalyst in a flow reactor (Scheme 9).72
Pandey et al. achieved the formation of six-membered nitrogen-
containing rings by a photocatalyzed reaction.73, 74 Dicyanonaphthalene
was used as the photocatalyst for the transformation which can be performed
in isopropanol as the solvent (Scheme 10).
In this little book some of the earlier builders on the scrap-heap will
be noted—the Greek philosopher, Aristotle; the Belgian anatomist,
Vesalius; the Englishmen, Tyson and Prichard; the Swede, Linnaeus;
the Frenchman, Buffon; and the German, Blumenbach. These laid
the foundations of the science, and each is claimed as the true
founder of Anthropology. After these the workers become more
numerous and more specialised, and they will be dealt with under
the separate headings of the various branches of the subject in
which they laboured, rather than in a continuous chronological order.
“Meddling with questions of merit or priority is a thorny business at
the best of times,” as Huxley said; and completeness is not here
aimed at. Mention can be made only of those whose work notably
contributed to, or illustrates, the historical growth of the science.
It may be objected that too much attention has been given to the
arm-chair workers, and too little to the labourers in the field. This is
true, especially in the section on Ethnology; but it is necessitated by
the compass of the volume. We attempt a brief sketch of the wood,
and cannot stop to describe the individual trees that compose it.
Detailed investigations, however valuable, have to be merged into
generalisations; and generalisations proceed mainly from the arm-
chairs.
Professor Michael Foster somewhere remarked that “hypothesis is
the salt of science.” The main difficulty with which observers in the
field have to contend is that, as a rule, they can see only what they
look for. When an investigator has left his field and is working up his
results at home, he only too frequently finds that he has omitted to
look for certain customs or beliefs, whose occurrence in other places
he had either over-looked or forgotten. This is the justification for the
questionnaires. It is one of the most important functions of stay-at-
home synthetic students laboriously to cull data from the vast
literature of anthropology, travel, and ancient and modern history,
and to weld them into coherent hypotheses. The student at home in
this way suggests fresh inquiries to the field ethnologist, and a richer
harvest is the result. The most valuable generalisations are made,
however, when the observer is at the same time a generaliser; but
“doubtless,” as Maharbal said to Hannibal after the battle of Cannae,
“the gods have not bestowed everything on the same man. You,
Hannibal, know how to conquer; but you do not know how to use
your victory.”
The vastness of the anthropological sciences and the nebulous
character of their demarcation from other sciences render their
definition or classification a peculiarly difficult matter. Even at the
present day students are not agreed upon the exact terminology and
limitations of the various branches of their subject; but, after all,
these are little more than academic discussions, since investigations
go on irrespective of boundary lines. Those who are really worried
about this “terminological inexactitude” are the cataloguers and
librarians, who frequently are at a loss where to place items in their
catalogues or books on their shelves. It was mainly from this point of
view that Dieserud was constrained to write his Science of
Anthropology: Its Scope and Content.[1] This useful little book deals
very fully in historical order with the questions referred to above, and
it may be recommended to those who are interested in these
somewhat profitless discussions.
1. This is the title on the back of the book. Its designation on the title-page is
given correctly in the Bibliography.
The meaning of the word was scarcely clear in the beginning of the
nineteenth century, when we find, in the British Encyclopædia of
1822, the following definitions, “A discourse upon human nature,”
and “Among Divines, that manner of expression by which the
inspired writers attribute human parts and passions to God.”
Concerning the present use of the term “Anthropology,” few will
take exception to the definition given by Topinard in his
l’Anthropologie (1876): “Anthropology is the branch of natural history
which treats of man and the races of man.” It may be yet more
succinctly described as “the science of man,” which comprises two
main divisions—the one which deals with the natural man
(ανθρωπος, or homo); the other which is concerned with man in
relation to his fellows, or, in other words, with social man (εθνορ, or
socius). At the end of the Introduction we give the classification
which we propose to adopt. It should, however, be stated that,
whereas in this country we employ the term “Anthropology” to cover
the whole subject, it is common on the Continent to restrict the term
to what we designate as “Physical Anthropology,” “Anthropography,”
or “Somatology.”
In the time of Aristotle Man took his place naturally at the head of
the other animals, being distinguished from the brutes by certain
characters. But the influence of religion and of philosophy did not
long permit of this association. Man came to be regarded as the chef
d’œuvre of creation, a thing apart, a position aptly described in the
words of Saint Paul (marginal version) “for a little while inferior to the
angels.”
In the eighteenth century came a startling change. Man was
wrenched from this detached and isolated attitude, and linked on
once more to the beasts of the field. This was the work of Linnæus.
Linnæus. The year 1707 is memorable in the history of
Anthropology as the date of the birth of two of its
greatest men, Linnæus[12] (1707-1778) and Buffon (1707-1788). Both
devoted long lives to science, and both produced monumental works
of permanent value; but it would be hard to find two contemporary
figures engaged in the same pursuit whose lives presented a greater
contrast.
12. By a patent of nobility conferred in 1757 Linnæus became Karl von Linné.
Linnæus was the son of a poor pastor, and his mother was the
daughter of the former pastor of the same small Swedish parish. At
the early age of four young Karl is said to have taken an interest in
botany, and to have begun to ask questions that his father could not
answer. Either to escape this interrogation, or for wiser motives, the
father made it a rule never to answer the same question twice, and
to this early discipline Linnæus used to trace his tenacious memory.
The boy was intended for the ministry, and was early sent to school;
but, as he devoted all his time to botany, his progress in theology
was nil, and when, after two years, his father visited the school, and
learnt of the disappointing result of all the pinching and saving which
had gone to provide for the son’s education, he resolved to
apprentice him to a tailor or shoemaker in hopes of obtaining a better
return for his outlay. Fortunately a friend intervened, and gave the
boy board and lodging, besides private tuition, while he finished his
gymnasium course. His work as a student seems to have failed to
satisfy his instructors, for when he proceeded to the University of
Lund it was with the enigmatic testimonial to the effect that “some
shrubs in a garden may disappoint the cares of the gardener, but if
transplanted into different soil may prosper.”
When barely twenty-two he left Lund for Upsala, taking with him
his entire fortune of £8, and, being inexperienced and unknown,
soon found himself in desperate straits. He was rescued by the
generosity of Dr. Celsius, a professor of theology, but student of
botany, who, impressed with Karl’s collections and enthusiasm,
offered him board and lodging, and obtained for him some private
pupils. The hardships of his life were not yet over, but gradually his
work obtained recognition, abroad sooner than at home, and he
could have lived at his ease in England or the Netherlands; only (as
he expressed it), “his Sara was in Sweden,” and he returned to his
native land to scrape together sufficient means to marry her.
Buffon.
From the beginning Georges Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon, was
marked out for a different life. His father was a Burgundian
Councillor, and his mother, besides being an heiress, was a woman
of unusual ability. He was originally destined for the law, but his
tastes always inclined towards science, and he soon found occasion
to follow them.
He made the acquaintance of a young Englishman of rank and of
his tutor, who was a man of science, and with them he travelled on
the continent. About the same time Linnæus was also travelling, but
in a different fashion. He set out to make explorations in Lapland,
then very little known, carrying his luggage on his back, and covered
nearly 5,000 miles at a cost of about £25. During his travels he kept
a diary[13] of his observations, which contains not only botanical but
also ethnological information of great value.
13. See Globus, “Linné als Ethnologe,” xci., 1907.
While Linnæus was living from hand to mouth, depending for his
food on chance generosity, and mending his boots with folded paper,
Buffon was living the gay life of the young men of his age and rank,
and we hear of him being forced to flee to Paris to escape the results
of wounding an Englishman in a gaming quarrel. (Linnæus was also
guilty of drawing his sword in anger, but the provocation was
different. During his absence from Upsala a rival had, by private
influence, contrived to get a prohibition put on all private lecturing in
the University, and he returned to find all his means of livelihood
suddenly cut off.)
Nevertheless Buffon’s life of pleasure did not occupy all his
energies. He possessed, as Voltaire said, “l’âme d’un sage dans le
corps d’un athlête,” and while in Paris he wrote and translated
various scientific works, was elected a member of the Academy of
Science, and in 1739 was appointed keeper of the Jardin du Roi and
of the Royal Museum.
The permanent value to Anthropology of the work of these two
men lies in the fact that they both “saw life steadily, and saw it
whole.” But they produced results not only distinct, but, in some
respects, antagonistic. Buffon, as Topinard says, did not classify, he