Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SOP For Post Market Surveillance
SOP For Post Market Surveillance
Revision History
____________________________________ ____________________
1
Standard Operating Procedure
Postmarket Surveillance of NURA-Link Leadless Version #: Effective Date: Page 2 of 5
Pacemaker 1.0 03/24/2024
1. Introduction
1.1 Purpose
This SOP serves as a comprehensive guide for conducting post-market surveillance of the
NURALink Leadless Pacemaker, an innovative cardiac device aimed at providing pacing therapy to patients
with various cardiac conditions. The primary objective is to continually monitor the safety and
effectiveness of the device following its commercial release, ensuring that any potential issues are
identified promptly and appropriate actions are taken to mitigate risks.
1.2 Background
The NURALink Leadless Pacemaker obtained PMA approval based on robust clinical data from the
Leadless II study, comprising two phases. Phase 1, involving 526 subjects, focused on evaluating the safety
and effectiveness of the device. Phase 2, with 200 subjects, validated modifications made to the device.
These studies laid the foundation for the device's regulatory approval and subsequent commercialization.
2. Data Sources
To facilitate comprehensive adverse event reporting, standardized forms will be made accessible
through various channels, including the manufacturer's website, healthcare provider offices, and
traditional mail services. These forms will capture essential information such as patient demographics,
detailed descriptions of adverse events, device information, actions taken, and relevant medical records.
Additionally, a dedicated toll-free number will be established to facilitate verbal reporting for enhanced
accessibility.
Device Registries:
Establishing a secure, web-based device registry specifically for the NURALink Leadless Pacemaker
will enable the collection of longitudinal data on patient outcomes and device performance. Patients
implanted with the device will be actively encouraged to enroll in the registry, either through direct mail
communication or during routine follow-up appointments. Data collection will include electronic patient-
reported outcome (ePRO) questionnaires and physician-reported data, covering aspects such as quality
of life, device performance metrics, and any reported complications or adverse events.
Literature Reviews:
2
Standard Operating Procedure
Postmarket Surveillance of NURA-Link Leadless Version #: Effective Date: Page 3 of 5
Pacemaker 1.0 03/24/2024
concerns reported in the scientific literature, ensuring that the post-market surveillance efforts remain
comprehensive and up-to-date.
Customer Complaints:
A robust system will be established for receiving, documenting, and investigating customer
complaints related to the NURALink Leadless Pacemaker. This system may include dedicated email
addresses, phone lines, or online complaint forms to facilitate efficient communication. All complaints will
be thoroughly investigated to determine their root causes, and appropriate corrective actions will be
taken accordingly, such as issuing device recalls, providing technical support to healthcare providers, or
updating device labeling.
A dedicated team will be responsible for overseeing the collection, processing, and analysis of
data from all relevant sources outlined above. Data will be meticulously collected in a standardized format
to ensure consistency and accuracy, utilizing a secure electronic database for storage. Rigorous statistical
analyses will be conducted to identify any notable trends or patterns in adverse events, device
performance metrics, or patient outcomes.
4. Reporting
Periodic reports summarizing the findings of the post-market surveillance activities will be
generated at predefined intervals, typically annually, and submitted to regulatory authorities such as the
US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These reports will provide a comprehensive overview of the
number and types of adverse events reported, trends in device performance, emerging safety concerns,
and any relevant effectiveness data obtained from the device registry. Additionally, public reports
summarizing key findings may be prepared and made available on the manufacturer's website to enhance
transparency and public awareness.
5. Risk Management
3
Standard Operating Procedure
Postmarket Surveillance of NURA-Link Leadless Version #: Effective Date: Page 4 of 5
Pacemaker 1.0 03/24/2024
6. Communication
Effective communication is essential for ensuring that relevant stakeholders are kept informed of post-
market surveillance activities and any pertinent safety or effectiveness concerns. Open lines of
communication will be maintained with healthcare providers, patients, and regulatory authorities through
various channels.
With Patients:
To keep patients informed and engaged, a patient registry newsletter may be published
periodically, providing updates on the device's performance and safety profile. Additionally, a dedicated
patient hotline or email address will be established to address any inquiries or concerns related to the
NURALink Leadless Pacemaker, ensuring that patient feedback is promptly addressed and considered.
Prompt and transparent communication will be maintained with regulatory authorities regarding
any serious adverse events, device malfunctions, or emerging trends identified through post-market
surveillance activities. Regulatory authorities will be promptly notified of any corrective actions taken by
the manufacturer in response to identified risks or safety concerns, facilitating a collaborative approach
to ensuring patient safety and device effectiveness.
7. Training
8. Recordkeeping
4
Standard Operating Procedure
Postmarket Surveillance of NURA-Link Leadless Version #: Effective Date: Page 5 of 5
Pacemaker 1.0 03/24/2024
Strict recordkeeping protocols will be adhered to, ensuring that all documentation related to post-
market surveillance activities is accurately maintained and organized. This includes but is not limited to
adverse event reports, device registry data, literature review summaries, customer complaints, post-
market surveillance reports, risk management documentation, and communication records with
healthcare providers, patients, and regulatory authorities. These records will be stored securely in
accordance with regulatory requirements and the manufacturer's quality management system,
facilitating traceability and accountability.
9. Audit
Regular audits of the post-market surveillance program will be conducted to assess compliance
with this SOP and relevant regulatory requirements. These audits may be performed internally by
designated personnel or by external auditors appointed by regulatory authorities. The audits will evaluate
the effectiveness of the surveillance program, identify any areas for improvement, and ensure that
corrective actions are promptly implemented to address any deficiencies. By maintaining a robust audit
process, the manufacturer can uphold the highest standards of quality and safety in post-market
surveillance activities.
10. References
- ISO 14971: Medical devices - Application of risk management to medical devices: This standard provides
guidance on the application of risk management principles to medical devices, ensuring that potential
risks associated with the device are identified, evaluated, and mitigated throughout its lifecycle.
- ISO 13485: Medical devices - Quality management systems - Requirements for regulatory purposes: This
standard specifies requirements for a quality management system specifically tailored to the medical
device industry, ensuring that manufacturers establish and maintain processes that comply with
regulatory requirements and consistently deliver safe and effective products.
These standards serve as foundational frameworks for the development and implementation of the post-
market surveillance program, ensuring alignment with industry best practices and regulatory
expectations.
This SOP will undergo periodic review and updates to reflect changes in regulatory requirements,
post-market surveillance data, and device labeling. By maintaining an up-to-date revision history, the
manufacturer can ensure that the SOP remains current and relevant, incorporating new insights and
lessons learned from ongoing surveillance.