Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 14

Comparison and evaluation of the accuracies of the Exact and the approximate equations of

Kraus and Tai, using the radiation intensities (power patterns) of the following :

𝑩𝒐 𝒄𝒐𝒔𝒏 𝜽 𝟎≤ 𝜽 ≤ 𝝅∕𝟐, 𝟎 ≤ 𝝓 ≤ 𝟐𝝅
𝑼(𝜽)= 𝒆𝒍𝒔𝒆 𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆
𝟎

1
It is clear that:
Kraus’ Equation: is more accurate for small values of n < 11.28 (broader patterns)
Tai & Per.’ Equation: is more accurate for large values of n > 11.28 (narrower patterns)
2
2.6.2 Omnidirectional Patterns

3
Omnidirectional patterns can often be approximated by:

U(𝜽)= 𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒏 𝜽 𝟎 ≤ 𝜽 ≤ 𝝅, 𝟎 ≤ 𝝓 ≤ 𝟐𝝅
The exact directivity of the omnidirectional patterns can be obtained by using the
exact formula: 𝑼 𝑼 𝟒𝝅𝑼
𝑫= = =
𝑼𝟎 𝑷𝒓𝒂𝒅 𝑷𝒓𝒂𝒅
( )
𝟒𝝅
Or using approximate equations:
𝟏𝟎𝟏
𝑫𝒐 ≈ 𝑯𝑷𝑩𝑾 (𝒅𝒆𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒆𝒔) − 𝟎.𝟎𝟎𝟐𝟕 𝑯𝑷𝑩𝑾 (𝒅𝒆𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒆𝒔) 𝟐 McDonald Equation

𝑫𝒐 ≈ −𝟏𝟕𝟎 + 𝟏𝟗𝟏 𝟎. 𝟖𝟏𝟖 + 1∕𝑯𝑷𝑩𝑾 𝒅𝒆𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒆𝒔 Pozar Equation 4


5
Example: Design an antenna with omnidirectional amplitude pattern with a half-power
beamwidth (HPBW) of 90◦. Express its radiation intensity by U = 𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒏 𝜽.
1- Determine the value of n and attempt to identify elements that exhibit such a pattern.
2- Determine 𝑫𝟎 of the antenna using the exact and approximate equations.
Solution:
1- Since 𝜃 = 1/2 (HPBW) = 45◦ ⇒ U(𝜃 = 45◦) = 0.5 = 𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒏 𝟒𝟓 = (𝟎. 𝟕𝟎𝟕)𝒏 or n = 2
Therefore, the radiation intensity of the omnidirectional antenna is represented

U = 𝒔𝒊𝒏𝟐 𝜽 (Small dipole Antenna)


2π 𝜋 𝟖𝝅
2- Since 𝑼𝒎𝒂𝒙 = 1 ⇒ 𝑷𝒓𝒂𝒅 = 𝒔𝒊𝒏𝟐 𝜽 . 𝒔𝒊𝒏𝜽 𝒅𝜽 𝒅𝝓 = , therefore,
𝟎 𝟎 𝟑

𝟖𝝅 𝟑
the exact directivity: 𝑫𝒐 = 𝟒𝝅 ( ) = = 𝟏. 𝟓
𝟑 𝟐
6
and the approximate values:

𝟏𝟎𝟏
a- 𝑫𝒐 ≈ 𝟗𝟎− 𝟎.𝟎𝟎𝟐𝟕 𝟗𝟎) 𝟐 McDonald Equation

b- 𝑫𝒐 ≈ −𝟏𝟕𝟎 + 𝟏𝟗𝟏 𝟎. 𝟖𝟏𝟖 + 1∕𝟗𝟎 Pozar Equation

7
ANTENNA EFFICIENCY: The antenna efficiency (or radiation efficiency) can
be defined as the ratio of the radiated power to the input power of the antenna.
Associated with an antenna are a number of efficiencies. The total antenna efficiency 𝒆𝟎 is
used to take into account losses at the input terminals and within the structure of the
antenna losses due to:
1- Reflections because of the mismatch between the transmission line and the
antenna.
2- 𝑰𝟐 𝑹 losses (conduction and dielectric).
Therefore, 𝑒0 can be written as:
𝒆𝟎 = 𝒆𝒓 . 𝒆𝒄 . 𝒆𝒅
𝑒0 = total efficiency (dimensionless)
𝑒𝑟 = reflection (mismatch) efficiency = (1 − Γ 2 ) (dimensionless)
𝑒𝑐 = conduction efficiency (dimensionless)
𝑒𝑑 = dielectric efficiency (dimensionless)
Γ = voltage reflection coefficient at the input terminals of the antenna
8
9
Gain: Another useful figure-of-merit describing the performance of an antenna is the
gain. Although the gain of the antenna is closely related to the directivity, it is a measure
that takes into account the efficiency of the antenna as well as its directional
capabilities.
𝒓𝒂𝒅𝒊𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒔𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝑼 𝜽,∅
G𝒂𝒊𝒏 = 𝟒𝝅
𝒕𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝑷𝒊𝒏 𝒂𝒄𝒄𝒆𝒑𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒑𝒐𝒘𝒆𝒓
= 𝟒𝝅
𝑷𝒊𝒏
(dimensionless)

𝑷𝒓𝒂𝒅 = 𝒆𝒄𝒅 𝑷𝒊𝒏

𝑼 𝜽,∅
G𝒂𝒊𝒏 𝜽, ∅ = 𝒆𝒄𝒅 . [𝟒𝝅 ]
𝑷𝒓𝒂𝒅

G𝒂𝒊𝒏 𝜽, ∅ = 𝒆𝒄𝒅 . D 𝜽, ∅
𝑮𝟎 =G𝒂𝒊𝒏 𝜽, ∅ | 𝒎𝒂𝒙 = 𝒆𝒄𝒅 . D 𝜽, ∅ | 𝒎𝒂𝒙 = 𝒆𝒄𝒅 𝑫𝟎
10
Absolute Gain:

𝑮𝒂𝒃𝒔 𝜽, ∅ = 𝒆𝒓 . G𝒂𝒊𝒏 𝜽, ∅ = (1 − Γ 𝟐 ) G𝒂𝒊𝒏 𝜽, ∅


= 𝒆𝒓 𝒆𝒄𝒅 D 𝜽, ∅ = 𝒆𝟎 D 𝜽, ∅

Maximum Absolute Gain:

𝑮𝟎𝒂𝒃𝒔 𝜽, ∅ = 𝒆𝒓 . G𝒂𝒊𝒏 𝜽, ∅ | 𝒎𝒂𝒙 = (1 − Γ 𝟐 ) G𝒂𝒊𝒏 𝜽, ∅ | 𝒎𝒂𝒙


= 𝒆𝒓 𝒆𝒄𝒅 D 𝜽, ∅ | 𝒎𝒂𝒙 = 𝒆𝟎 𝑫𝟎

11
Partial Gain:
𝐆𝐨 = 𝐆𝛉 + 𝐆𝛟
𝐔𝛉 𝟒𝛑𝐔𝛉
𝐆𝛉 = 𝐏𝐢𝐧
= .
𝐏𝐢𝐧
𝟒𝛑

𝐔𝛟 𝟒𝛑𝐔𝛟
𝐆𝛟 = 𝐏𝐢𝐧
=
𝐏𝐢𝐧
𝟒𝛑

For many practical Antennas, the approximate Gain:

𝟑𝟎, 𝟎𝟎𝟎
𝑮𝒐 ≈
𝚯𝒅𝟏 ∙ 𝚯𝒅𝟐
12
Example: A lossless resonant half-wavelength dipole antenna, with input
impedance of 73 ohms, is connected to a transmission line whose characteristic
impedance is 50 ohms. Assuming that the pattern of the antenna is given
approximately by:
U = 𝐁𝐨 𝒔𝒊𝒏𝟑 𝜽
Find the maximum realized gain of this antenna.
Solution:
𝐃𝐨 = 𝟏.67 ⇒ 𝑮𝟎 = 𝒆𝒄𝒅 𝑫𝟎 = 𝟏. 𝟔𝟕, (𝒆𝒄𝒅 = 𝟏)

𝟐 𝟕𝟑−𝟓𝟎 𝟐
𝒆𝒓 = (1 − Γ ) = 𝟏 − = 0.965 ⇒ 𝒆𝟎 = 𝒆𝒓 𝒆𝒄𝒅 = 0.96
𝟕𝟑+𝟓𝟎

Therefore, the realized gain 𝑮𝟎𝒓𝒆 = 𝒆𝟎 𝑮𝟎 = 0.965(1.697) = 1.6376

13
BEAM EFFICIENCY:
𝒑𝒐𝒘𝒆𝒓 𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒏𝒔𝒎𝒊𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒆𝒊𝒗𝒆𝒅 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒏 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒈𝒍𝒆 𝜽𝟏
𝑩𝑬 =
𝒑𝒐𝒘𝒆𝒓 𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒏𝒔𝒎𝒊𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒅 (𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒆𝒊𝒗𝒆𝒅) 𝒃𝒚 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒏𝒂

𝟐𝝅 𝜽𝟏
𝟎 𝟎 𝑼(𝜽,∅)𝒔𝒊𝒏𝜽 𝒅𝜽 𝒅∅
𝑩𝑬 = 𝟐𝝅 𝝅
𝟎 𝟎 𝑼(𝜽,∅)𝒔𝒊𝒏𝜽 𝒅𝜽 𝒅∅

BANDWIDTH: The bandwidth can be considered to be the range


of frequencies, on either side of a center frequency
14

You might also like