Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Report Writing L5
Report Writing L5
Report Writing
(Michael Faraday)
Report
Written
Oral
2
Data management cycle
Design Enumerators collect
questionnaire data in the field
Design
survey Manual checking,
Conception
editing etc.
Reporting of results
We are now
finishing off Data entered
Data onto computer
the data
analysis
analysis and
are ready to
write it up. 3
Computer data management
Introduction
4
Definition
A report is a prepared account of what
happened, about a particular event, presented in
formal and organized format backed with
statistical evidence.
A report is a talkative work (usually of writing,
speech, television, or film) made with the
specific intention of relaying information or
recounting certain events in a widely
presentable form
It may be a single report or a series of them.
5
Which Reports?
Sales Reports
Inspection Reports
Annual Reports
Audit Reports
Feasibility Reports
Progress Reports
White Papers
Technical Writing Reports
Proposals
User Manuals
Technical Manuals
White Papers: is an authoritative report or
guide helping readers to understand an
issue, solve a problem, or make a decision.[1]
White papers are used in two main spheres:
government and business-to-business
marketing.
Classification of Reports
Formal Reports and Informal Reports
Information Reports
Analytical Reports
Recommendation Reports
Types of Reports
Academic Report:
9
Types of Reports continued
Professional Report:
Professional reports are for informing and
persuading people as well as initiating change
They may be detailed depending on the targeted
audience/taste of the sponsor.
In most cases they have a mixed audience of those
who may understand the in-depth of the subject
content and non technical people like the decision-
makers.
10
Good Report
11
Good Report Continued
13
Good Report continued..
15
Structure
Body of the report
Introduction: What are we talking about?
Method: How did we measure?
Results: What did we measure?
Discussion: What does it mean?
Conclusions: What should be remembered?
16
Structure
End matters
References: Whose work was referred to?
Appendices: Extra information
17
Title
Short
Accurate
Informative
Include key-words
Allow search engines to find the article
No abbreviations
18
Title
Title should be concise, complete,
comprehensible, correct, descriptive (and not
the title of the lab procedures)
Title PAGE should have the following: title,
authors, affiliation, date
Does not have to be on a separate page, see sample
journal articles
Examples
Pulse, Echos, and Goo”
“The Applicability of Ultrasound in Determining
Mechanical Properties of Materials”
Which one is good or bad?
22
Abstract
Summary of work
Should be self-contained (no references)
1-2 sentences for each of the 5 main parts
(introduction, method, results, discussion,
conclusions) – then streamline
High information content
The discussion is normally removed /ignored in
most researches…….
But effectively, discuss the findings briefly
23
Abstract
The abstract main part breakdown:
Introduction
Topic of research
Objectives
Method/Methodology
Techniques, models, designs
Data Analysis
How data was collected
How it was analysed
Findings/results
Conclusion /recommendation
24
Abstract
No abbreviations
200-300 words
Best (re-)written last
All information should be covered in the body
of the report
An example:
The present paper reports the results of an experimental investigation of the heat
What
transfer and pressure drop characteristics of laminar flow of viscous oil through
horizontal rectangular and square plain ducts and ducts inserted with full-length
twisted tapes, short-length twisted tapes, and regularly spaced twisted-tape
elements. Isothermal pressure drop measurements were taken in acrylic ducts. Heat
transfer measurements were taken in electrically heated stainless-steel ducts imposing How
uniform wall heat flux boundary conditions. The duct aspect ratios AR were 1, 0.5, and
0.333. The twist ratios of the twisted tapes were y=2.692, 5.385, 2.597, 5.193, 2.308, and
4.615. Short-length tapes were 0.9, 0.7, and 0.5 times the duct length. The space ratios
were s=2.692, 5.385, 2.597, 5.193, 2.308, and 4.615. Both friction factor and Nusselt
number increase by 30% (+ 5%) with decreasing y and AR for AR1 and increasing Re,
Sw, and Pr. As the tape-length decreases by a factor of 2, both friction factor and Nusselt Results
number decrease by a factor of 3. Friction factor increases by 80% (+ 12%) as s
decreases by 50%, and Nusselt number increases by 75% (+ 30%) as s increases by
100%. Isothermal friction factor correlation and comprehensive Nusselt number
correlation have been developed to predict data reasonably well in the entire range of
parameters. Performance evaluation says that short-length twisted tapes are worse and
Conclusion/
regularly spaced twisted-tape elements are better than the full-length twisted tapes. Significance
This is about 200 words
Introduction: chapter
Usually too long
Best written last (or at least rewritten). The
work it requires (e.g. background reading)
needs to be done first.
Provides background information
Starts wide and focuses quickly
Tries to catch the interest
Introduces each and every new idea,
concept, symbol, abbreviation
Khalid Al Murrani, "How to Write a Good Report", 27
2008-09
Introduction
Places paper in context
Relation to other work
Defines scope and purpose of the work.
What problem(s) are we trying to solve?
(Heading, Problem statement, significance)
What question(s) are we trying to answer?
(Main objectives, sub-objectives, research
questions/hypothesis)
28
Introduction
Shows what has been done (by others)
before
= literature review (here or separate chapter)
Refer to main authors/works in the field (most
relevant work)
Refer to most recent work in the field (use Citation
Index)
29
Integrating Useful Information
After you’ve constructed your argument,
you must:
Decide how to present information within your
research paper
Make your voice heard
Give proper credit to the original source
Quoting
Paraphrasing + Your Analysis
Summarizing
What is Paraphrasing?
Paraphrasing is stating an idea in
your own words
To properly paraphrase, you must significantly change
the wording, phrasing, and sentence structure of the
source (not just a few words)
Summarize when:
Quotations more than three lines should be indented one inch from
the left margin, double-spaced between lines, adding no quotation
marks that do not appear in the original:
Elizabeth Bishop's "In the Waiting Room" is rich in evocative detail:
It was winter. It got dark
early. The waiting room
was full of grown-up people,
arctics and overcoats,
lamps and magazines. (lines 6-10)
Why Paraphrase Instead of
Quoting?
A Plagiarized Version:
Students often use too many direct quotations when they take notes,
resulting in too many of them in the final research paper. In fact,
probably 10 percent of the final copy should consist of directly quoted
material. So it is important to limit the amount of source material copied
while taking notes.
Tips For Note-Taking
Plagiarism could result in an “F” grade for the paper and/or the
class, as well as expulsion from some university
You must cite sources within your paper and at the end of your
paper whenever
We will use APA style. Refer to the hard and soft copy
given you.
Introduction
Shows what has NOT been done before (and
was done in the present work)
Shows WHY the study needed to be done
(problem statement)
Objectives
55
Method
What method(s) did we use to address our
problem(s)? What method(s) did we use to
answer our question(s)?
Must allow evaluation of the results
Must allow verification of the results
(convince)
Describe experimental set-up, instruments,
procedures, statistical processing
Describe evaluation procedure
56
Method
Mention all settings, controls, variables,
processing, etc.
Assume basic knowledge of the field
Can include photographs and/or diagrams
May include limitations, assumptions, range
of validity
Describe what was actually done, NOT what
should have been done
57
Example of Theoretical Description
for a Modeling Study
LIF diagnostics have been constructed by pumping from the X-state to both the A and
B-states, although pumping to the A-state (the so-called bands) is preferable due to
the longer excitation wavelengths required. This reduces problems with attenuation of
laser light and LIF signals and complex electronic energy transfer.
In modeling the excitation process one solves a set of time dependent rate equations,
one for the population Ni of each quantum state i considered. The equations take on
the generalized form
dN i
dt
Q ji W ji N j Qij Wij N i Qlost N i
j i j i
(1)
Here, the first term represents the rate at which collisions (Qji) and radiative transitions
(Wji) populate state i, the second term the rate at which state i is depopulated by
collisions and radiative transitions, and the final term (Qlost) the sum of all process that
depopulate…
Example of Methods for an
Experimental Study
Intrinsic Inactivation Rate of Airborne Fungal Spores to Ultraviolet Germicidal Irraqdiation (UVGI).
Experiments were conducted in the pilot-scale chamber to estimate the intrinsic inactivation rate of airborne
fungal spores to UVGI. After purging the chamber with clean air, airborne fungal spores were continuously
generated (for usually 15 minutes) to raise the concentration in the chamber to a suitable level for detection.
Two box fans (48-cm diameter, Model 3723, Lasko Inc., West Chester, PA) were turned on to ensure mixing.
No ventilation was provided during this period and the UVGI lamps were kept off. Once the fungal spore
aerosolization was stopped, sampling of the airborne fungal spores was initiated. Also in some of the
experiments, UVGI lamps were turned on at this time. Samples were collected 4 or 5 separate times with
duplicate liquid impingers as the concentration decayed over a 14 or 26 min period. For each sample, the
impingers were operated for 3 to 5 minutes. The shorter decay time (14 min) was used for experiments in
which UVGI lamps were operating, while the longer decay time (26 min) was used for tests with UVGI
lamps not in operation. After the final sample was collected, the chamber was purged again with the clean
air. Decay experiments were conducted without the UVGI system operating to measure removal of airborne
fungal spores by deposition, exfiltration, and natural die-off. No ventilation was provided during these
experiments.
A completely-mixed room model was used to estimate the inactivation rate of UVGI as previously
described (Miller-Leiden et al. 1996; Xu et al. 2003, Xu et al. 2005). In summary, the least-squares method
was used to fit lines to the log-transformed concentrations measured over the decay period, and inactivation
rates were inferred by subtracting the slope of the lines for the no-UVGI experiments from those with UVGI.
The UVGI inactivation rate has units of ACH or h-1.
Results
Purely objective
Only facts and observations
No opinions or interpretations!
Text
Summarizes most important results of tables and
figures
Guides readers through tables and figures
Provides clarifying information
Points to anomalies in the results
60
Results
Figures
Label all axes
Mention all units
Use same scaling for figures that need to be
compared
Put caption BELOW the figure
Number the figures sequentially
Include the figure immediately after the first
reference to it in the text (unless page layout
does not permit)
61
Results
Figures
Put all required info on the figure (if possible) –
not in caption or text
Avoid crowded figures
Avoid the use of color
62
Results
Tables
Label all columns
Mention all units
Put caption ABOVE the table
Number the tables sequentially
Include the table immediately after the first
reference to it in the text (unless page layout
does not permit)
63
Tables
Tables need titles! Half or full-page tables/graphs usually work the best.
Remember to refer to table in your text.
Table 1
Airflo w rates measured du ring t wo-room ETS particle expe rimen ts (m 3 h-1)1
ACH
Scenario FN,S FS,N FS,O FN,O FO,S FO,N Ff,S Ff,N (h-1)2
0.001
Baseli ne 60 4 59 4 2.4 1.7 0.001 1.6 0.2 0.8 0.2 Ğ Ğ 0.04
Segr ega tion 0.6 0.03 1.1 0.01 2.5 0.03 4.2 0.1 3.1 0.04 3.7 0.1 Ğ Ğ 0.1
Exh aus t
ven til ation 92 2.4 17 0.8 107 1.7 0.0 0.0 32 1.8 75 1.4 Ğ Ğ 1.7
Enh anced
ven til ation 154 17 163 17 10 5 11 5 19 1.4 2 1.3 Ğ Ğ 0.3
0.004
N fil tration 128 4 128 4 0.004 2.7 1.9 0.3 0.2 2.4 0.2 Ğ 91 9 0.03
S filt ration 46 0.9 47 0.8 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.8 0.7 0.1 1.6 0.1 91 9 Ğ 0.03
1
Th e air flow rates were e sti mat ed fro m tracer ga s measur em ents using a non li ne ar l east-squares m inimi zation techn ique (Mill er et al., 1997). Refer to Figu re 2
fo r airflow rate no menclat ure .
2
The se air exchang e rates, exp ressed inun its of air -change s per hour (ACH), represent the am ount of air exchanged w it h the outdoor s for th e system acting as a
singl e zone .
Example Figure
Tables need Captions, always underneath figure and numbered! Remember to
refer to Figure in your text.
140
120
Medium Flame
100
CO (ppm)
80 Flame
Extinguished
Manually
60
High Flame
40
Flame
20 Extinguished
Automatically
Low Flame
0
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960
elapsed time (min)
Figure 1. Typical CO profiles measured during the operation.
Typical CO profiles measured during the operation of unvented Fireplace A at the low, medium and high heat settings during (a) Spring 1997 and (b) Spring 1999.
Vertical lines indicate the instant when the flame was reduced or extinguished, either manually at the completion of the test or automatically during the test by the
oxygen depletion sensor. The CO monitor's maximum detection limit of 128 ppm was surpassed during the 1999 tests
Example Figure
Must have a
Title and Figure
Number and reference
This figure number in
Your text!
Figure 1. a) Full length twisted-tape insert inside a duct and b) regularly twisted tape elements.
Results
Use EITHER table OR figure for a particular
subset of results
Do not use more decimals in a number than
you could measure
Give an estimate of the measurement error
Also include “negative” results
They are often the source of the major
discoveries
67
Discussion
Only place where the author can and should
be less objective
Interpret your results. Did we solve our
problem(s)? Did we answer our question(s)?
Put results in perspective
Major patterns
Relationships, trends, generalizations
Exceptions to observed patterns and
generalizations 68
Discussion
Differences with published work or expected
results
Possible explanations for differences/
discrepancies
Point out potential shortcomings
Recommendations for future work
Theoretical implications
Possible applications
Possible generalizations
69
Discussion
Opinions can be mentioned
Shows what new things were learned from
the experiments/data
No new results? Replication.
What is the relevance of the present results –
what did we learn?
Explain, analyze, interpret, compare
Mention the things that are not readily
observable from the data
70
Conclusions
What do you want the reader to remember?
Should be self-contained (no references)
Typically 2-3 paragraphs (1 idea per
paragraph)
71
Or Summary and Conclusions
for 2nd degree and above
Start with a restatement of objectives
Again describe briefly the methods
State the important results: be quantitative with
uncertainty
State the important conclusions
Comment on what should be done in future
experiments, what would you recommend doing
next?
Acknowledgements
Thank all who have directly contributed to the
work
Thank any sponsoring organizations
Thank any external reviewer
Do not thank relatives and friends
77
Example
Introduction
In the early 1990s, many epidemiologic studies suggested that air pollution, even at the lower ambient air
concentrations that had been achieved with regulations and control technology, was still associated with
cardiopulmonary disease and mortality (Samet et al., 2000); especially the fine combustion-source pollution
most commonly found near heavy traffic areas (Pope, 2000).
…
References
Samet, J. M., F. Dominici, F. C. Curriero, I. Coursac, and S. L. Zeger (2000). Fine Particulate Air Pollution and
Mortality in 20 Us Cities, 1987-1994, New England Journal Of Medicine. 343:1742-1749.
Pope, C. A. (2000). Review: Epidemiological Basis for Particulate Air Pollution Health Standards, Aerosol
Science And Technology. 32:4-14.
Appendices
Additional material that is only meant for
technical reading
E.g.: mathematical proofs, raw results, circuit
diagrams, …
Non-essential to comprehension
Further clarify report
Each appendix should contain different
data/information
Appendices should be referred to in the text
79
Style
Paragraph
One idea per paragraph
One paragraph per idea
First sentence of paragraph is main idea
Rest of paragraph defines the idea
Tense
Passive
Avoid use of pronouns (I, we, you, …)
80
Style
Numbering
Number all pages
Number all headings except abstract
Hierarchical numbering of headings
Avoid repetitions
Use formal and impersonal language
Use a consistent style
81
Style
Respect the structure
Use the standard model unless there is a
strong reason for not doing so
E.g. several radically different parts split up
methods, results (and maybe discussion) per part
Advantages of standard model
Helps structure the report
Avoids forgetting essential parts
Helps separate data from opinions
Helps readers to do selective reading
82
Grammar
Should be impeccable
Spelling also
Articles
First time a process, part or concept is introduced:
“a” or “an”
Subsequently use: “the”
No article for uncountable nouns (e.g. NOT “a
happiness”)
Use short sentences
83
General recommendations
Be as brief as possible
Avoid unnecessary abbreviations
Know your audience
Don’t repeat the things the reader knows
Don’t copy the information from the lab sheets
Remove unnecessary words, sentences,
paragraphs
Weigh each word
Every word should be accurate, justified and
useful
84
General recommendations
The main purpose is to convey information
Don’t try to entertain
Good presentation is less important than sound
technical content
Don’t over-emphasize format (you are not
studying to be a technical secretary)
Follow the imposed format right from the
beginning
85
General recommendations
Proofread and let it be proofread
Follow preferably the same structure (sub-
headings) in methods, results and discussion
parts
86
General recommendations
A good report should demonstrate
comprehension, not just state facts
Check visibility and readability
87
Summary
89
Bibliography
Web:
CD Ingersoll, “Scientific Writing,” http://www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/internet/MTPCI/Introcourse04/9.-
Ingersoll---Scientific-Writing.ppt , 23 Nov 2004
RL Boxman, “How to Write a Good Paper,” http://www.isdeiv.tavrida.com/instructions.ppt, last accessed:
14 Feb 2005
K Boone, “How to Write a Technical Report,” http://www.kevinboone.com/howto_report.html, 8 Jul 2004
“The Stucture, Format, Content, and Style of a Journal-Stye Scientific Paper,”
http://abacus.bates.edu/~ganderso/biology/resources/writing/HTWsections.html, 25 Sep 2003
“Scientific Paper Writing,” http://www.geocities.com/EnchantedForest/Palace/1170/scipprwrt.html, last
accessed: 14 Feb 2005
K Kastens, S Pfirman, M Stute, et al, “How to Write Your Thesis,”
http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~martins/sen_sem/thesis_org.html, last accessed: 14 Feb 2005
R Irish, “Laboratory Reports,” http://www.ecf.toronto.edu/~writing/handbook-lab.html, 19 Aug 2002
“How to Write a Scientific Paper?”, http://www.bioen.utah.edu/faculty/KWH/teach/BE4201/How_to_w.pdf,
last accessed: 14 Feb 2005
“How to Write a Laboratory Report,”
http://www.mhhe.com/biosci/genbio/maderinquiry/supp/moorech5.html, last accessed: 14 Feb 2005
G Dillard, “The Scientific Paper,” http://bioweb.wku.edu/courses/Biol398/Paper/paperText.html, last
accessed: 14 Feb 2005
M Longan, “How to Write a Research Report and Give a Presentation,”
http://www.valpo.edu/geomet/geo/courses/geo361/presenting.html, last accessed: 14 Feb 2005
90