19 March 2024 Homework

1. Jacob More, often referred to as Jacobus More in Afrikaans, was a

controversial figure in South African history. He is primarily
remembered for his actions during the Second Anglo-Boer War
(1899-1902). More, a Boer leader, was accused of betrayal by
some within his community for his collaboration with the British
forces.
During the war, more agreed to collaborate with the British and
received a commission as a commandant in the British Army. He
was tasked with leading a group of Boer fighters known as the
"National Scouts" or "Bushveld Carbineers" in operations against
his fellow Boers who were still fighting against the British. This
collaboration was seen as betrayal by many Boers who were
fighting for independence from British rule.
More's actions led to deep divisions within Boer society, as he was
perceived as siding with the enemy against his own people. He
was considered a traitor by those who continued to resist British
rule. His decision to collaborate with the British and lead attacks
against Boer fighters earned him condemnation from many within
the Boer community, and his reputation has remained controversial
in South African history.

2.
1. Ownership of Land: The Mogape Tribe owned two large farms in
the area west of Johannesburg. The fact that they owned land
implies a sense of stability and security, which are often associated
with contentment.
1. Community Development: Over a period of 70 years, the tribe
had built two schools, a church, and sunk water boreholes without
government assistance. These community-building efforts suggest
a sense of pride and investment in their surroundings.
2. Economic Activities: Members of the tribe were engaged in
various economic activities, such as working in nearby towns and
farms, as well as growing vegetables for sale. Their ability to
sustain themselves economically indicates a level of satisfaction
with their lifestyle.
3. Self-Governance: The tribe governed its own community through
a tribal council. The ability to govern themselves suggests a level
of autonomy and empowerment, which could contribute to their
overall happiness.
4. Resistance to Forced Removal: Despite facing forced removal
from their land, many members of the tribe resisted and protested
against the government's actions. This resistance implies a strong
attachment to their land and a desire to remain in their current
location.
5. Support from Advocates: The fact that figures like the Black
Sash, Helen Suzman, and Archbishop Desmond Tutu appealed to
the government on behalf of the Mogape people suggests that
they were seen as a community deserving of support and
protection. This external support may have reinforced the tribe's
sense of belonging and happiness in their location.
3.
1. Protest and Advocacy: Both the Mogopa Tribe and the Outsiders
engaged in protests and advocacy efforts against the Group Areas
Act. They spoke out against the segregation and injustices imposed
by the law, raising awareness locally and international.
2. Legal Challenges: The Mogopa Tribe, along with support from
Outsiders, likely pursued legal challenges against the Group Areas
Act through the court system. They may have sought to challenge the
legality and constitutionality of the law in an attempt to overturn it.
3. Non-Compliance: Both groups may have engaged in acts of non-
compliance with the Group Areas Act, refusing to adhere to its
provisions and resisting forced removals or relocations from their land
and communities.
4. Alliances and Solidarity: The Mogopa Tribe likely formed
alliances and found solidarity with Outsiders who opposed apartheid
policies, including the Group Areas Act. These alliances strengthened
their resistance efforts and provided mutual support.
5. International Pressure: Outsiders, including international
organizations, activists, and foreign governments, likely exerted
pressure on the apartheid regime to repeal the Group Areas Act. This
international pressure may have included diplomatic efforts, economic
sanctions, and public condemnation of apartheid policies.
6. Media Campaigns: Both the Mogopa Tribe and Outsiders may
have utilized media campaigns to raise awareness about the
injustices of the Group Areas Act. This could include publishing
articles, organizing press conferences, and using other forms of
media to amplify their message.
7. Civil Disobedience: Members of both groups may have engaged
in acts of civil disobedience, such as refusing to comply with forced
removal orders or participating in mass protests against apartheid
laws.
8. Human Rights Advocacy: Outsiders, including human rights
organizations and activists, likely advocated for the rights of the
Mogopa Tribe and other affected communities under the Group Areas
Act. They may have documented human rights violations and lobbied
for international intervention.
9. Community Resilience: Despite the oppressive nature of the
Group Areas Act, both the Mogopa Tribe and Outsiders demonstrated
resilience and determination in their resistance efforts. They persisted
in their fight against apartheid policies, seeking justice and equality
for all South Africans.