Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Christology
Christology
suspect
How is Christology done?
Mark: between 60 - 70 AD
1. Christology “From Above” Matthew, Luke (Acts): 80 AD
An approach which begins with the Pre-existent John (Revelation): 90 AD
Word who is in heaven/from eternity, and who Synoptic Gospels - Gk syn + optic meaning “seen
descends into human history, becoming incarnate in together”; taken from same sources
Jesus
Focal point: Incarnation
The Nature of the Gospels: Are they strictly historical
Starting point: Church’s dogma
accounts?
“Testimonies of faith” = historical basis + faith
How is Christology done? interpretation
not histories or biography in the modern sense
2. Christology “From Below” stages in the development of the Gospel tradition:
An approach which begins with the human Jesus of words and deeds of Jesus – the preaching of the
Nazareth, and traces his story from birth to mission, apostles – writing of the gospels
culminating on his death and resurrection
Focal point: Resurrection
Starting point: Jesus of history (esp. as contained in The Message and Ministry of Jesus
biblical accounts “Basileia tou theou”
hidden in a field, which a man found and Jesus’ openness to sinners did not mean that he
covered up; then in his joy he goes and sells all submitted passively to or tolerated sin. He reversed
the normal pattern - conversion then communion.
that he has and buys that field. 45 "Again, the His offer of communion with sinners triggered
kingdom of heaven is like a merchant in search repentance - “conversion flowered from
communion”.
of fine pearls, 46 who, on finding one pearl of
frequency
18 For John came neither eating nor drinking, and they say, Importance and centrality
'He has a demon’; 19 the Son of Man came eating and 1. CCC 638: the crowing truth of our faith, regarded as
drinking, and they say, ‘Look, a glutton and a drunkard, a central truth by first Christian communities
2. 1 Cor 15:14-17: without the resurrection, in vain is - Church: the human and divine natures are united
our preaching and faith “without confusion, without change” and “without
3. Source of hope for us; our own promise of eternal division, without separation”
life
Origin/Basis: empty tomb tradition + resurrection
appearances Contemporary Christology
Nicea (325)
- issue: divinity of Christ
- Arius: Jesus as greatest, most perfect creature
- Church: Jesus is “homoousius” (of the same
substance) with the Father, “true God from true God,
begotten not made, one in being...”
- Hence, not subordinate but equal to the Father
Constantinople (381)
- issue: full humanity of Christ
- Appolinarius of Laodicea: Logos took the place
of the rational soul in Christ hence Christ is not
fully human because he does not have a rational
soul
- Church: Jesus had a human soul
Ephesus (431)
- issue: two natures but one person
- Nestorius: a human Jesus, “indwelt... as in a temple”
by the divine Christ, hence two persons (the human
as ‘shell’ of the divine person); Mary as the mother
of Jesus but not the mother of God
- Church: the two natures (divine and human) are
united in the one person of Christ; Mary as
Theotokos
Chalcedon (451)
- issue: distinction of the two natures of Christ
- Eutyches: monophysitism - the union of the divine
and human natures in Christ result in only one divine
nature; the human is absorbed by the divine