Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5.milling Sifting Mixingcomplete
5.milling Sifting Mixingcomplete
2. THEORY
2.1. Capacity and performance of the mill
- The efficiency and efficiency calculations of the turbines have dimensions Dp1 (ft)
and 80% product after weighing has dimensions Dpj (ft).
- P is capacity for milling material which is very large in size to Dp (calculated for the
unit
- volume / time), i = ∞.
P=K b
1
Dp√
- According to the definition, the Wi is necessary energy to mill from a very large size
up to 100µm (KWh/ton), we have:
- Reliable between Wi and Kb (the Bond coefficient depends on the type of material and
milling machine).
60 W i=K b
√ 1
100 ×10−3
60 W i
→ K b= ≈ 19 W i
√ 10
1
→ P=19 W i
√ Dp
1 1
where P1=19 W i ∧P2=19 W i
√Dp1 √Dp2
- We consider between the nth sieve and the (n+1)th sieve, and assume use the standard
sieve which have Dpn - 1 / Dpn = r = const.
−K b +1
∆ ∅ n=∅ n− ∅n−1=
b+1
( D pn + D pn−1 )
b+1
b+1
K .(r −1)
with K '=
b+1
or log ∆ ∅ n =(b+1)log D pn +log K '
- K’ and b are determined by drawing ∆øn and Dpn based on the logarithmic graph then
infer angular coefficient K+1 and angular ordane K’ K and b
√
N
∑ ( C A −C iA )2
i=1
sA =
N−1
√
N
∑ ( C B−C iB )2
i=1
s B=
N −1
With CA, CB is the composition of A, B in the mixture. We can see the more ideal the
mixture is, the smaller the sA, sB is. sA, sB depend on many factors but the most
important is the time. The relation between s and time is described by the graph
(assume other factors are not change).
- In real, depend on the requirement of s, we can determine the suitable time. To
evaluate the homogeneous of the mixture, we can see another value is mix index:
σe
I s=
s
σ e=
√ C A CB
n
√
C A C B (N−1)
→ I s= N
n . ∑ ( C A −CiA ) 2
i=1
4. EXPERIMENTAL RESULT
4.1. Results
4.1.1. Mill
Amperage (A)
Mass Time
No load Load
200g
log(Dp) log(DF) F
-0.37
-0.50
-0.70
-0.80
0.425
0.315
0.2
0.16
4.1.3. Mixing
TIME 5"
Sampl
S G CiA CiA-CA (CiA-CA)2 Ʃ n σe Is
e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
TIME 15"
Sampl
S G CiA CiA-CA (CiA-CA)2 Ʃ n σe Is
e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 103 170 0.38 -0.29 0.08
8 131 52 0.72 0.05 0.002
TIME 30"
Sampl
S G CiA CiA-CA (CiA-CA)2 Ʃ n σe Is
e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
TIME 60"
Sample S G CiA CiA-CA (CiA-CA)2 Ʃ n σe Is
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
TIME 120"
Sampl
S G CiA CiA-CA (CiA-CA)2 Ʃ n σe Is
e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
TIME 300"
Sampl
N X CiA CiA-CA (CiA-CA)2 Ʃ n σe Is
e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
4.2. Graphs
4.2.1. Milling
4.2.2. Sifting:
Chart 3. Chart of accumulated distribution of size distribution of the material on sieve
4.2.3. Mixing:
4.3. Discussion
1) Discussing about the adaptation of Bond’s Law in predicting the milling
efficiency, especially focus on the other theories:
2) Give the comments on the efficiency of sifting and milling. Compare with the
result in book. Explain.
3) Comment on the way taking the samples in the mixing experiment:
mixing index. That is the time we shough implement the beans mixing to meet the
highes uniform level.
4) Comment of the reliability of the result and the elements that affect the most to the
mixing experiment:
5. APPENDIX:
5.1. Milling calculation:
a. The determination of the equilibrium diameter of the material particle :
- The equilibrium of the particle is a diameter of a sphere has the same ratio V/S.
3
V ( π / 6) D tñ D tñ
= =
S πD 2 6
- To the spherical particle: tñ
- The average dimensions of the rice:
Length: L = 6mm
Diameter: D = 1.5mm
V ( π / 4 ) D2 L DL
= 2
=
- Consider the rice as a cylinder S π DL+( π / 2) D 4 L+2 D
Dtñ DL 3 DL 3×1 .5×6
= ⇔ Dtñ = =
So: 6 4 L+ 2 D 2 L+ D 2×6+ 1. 5 = 2 (mm)
Therfore: Dp1 = Dtñ = 2 (mm)
b. Chart Logn following LogDpn:
Line equation: Logn = (b+1)LogDpn + logK’ (*)
According to chart 2, the diagram goes through 3 points
b+1=2.9975 b=1.9975
So: ' ⇨ '
log K =2.4921 K =310. 53
K (r b+1 −1)
But: K’= b+1
D pn−1 0.425 0.315 0.2
With: r = =( + + )/3 = 1.39
D pn 0.315 0.2 0.16
∫ dφ=−K ∫ Dbp dD p
−K b+1 −310.53 b +1 2.9975
= D p +C= D p +C=−103.6 D p +C
b+1 2.9975
Bond’s law: Dp2 is the size of the material after the milling process as long as 80% of weight
goes throuh sieves The accumulated weight = 20% = 0.2.
Dp2 = 0.43 mm
c. Milling efficiency calculation:
The efficiency to grind the material (dry process) from size Dp1 to size Dp2:
4
׿¿
P = 3 19Wi T (KW)
With:
Wi – Work index. According to the theory, Wi = 13KW.h/ton.
T – Milling capacity, ton/ min
M
With: T = t
M – Weight of milling material, ton
t – Milling time, min
Dp1, Dp2 – Dimension of the material particle and product particle, mm
4 1 1 200 ×10−6
So: P = ×19 ×13 ×( − )× =0.13 kW
3 √ 0.43 √ 2 25.18 /60
d. Milling machine efficiency calculation:
Power consumped for the machine: P’ = U.I.cos
With:
U – voltage, V
I – current at maximum loading, A
cos - power coefficiency
So: P’ = 220 x 4.6 x 0.8 = 809.6 (W) = 0.8096 (kW)
Milling machine efficiency:
P 0.13
H= × 100 %= ×100 %=16.06 %
P' 0.8096
b
With Green beans: C B=
a+ b
With:
N –Number of the sample volume Vi. In this experiment, N = 8.
n – Number of beans in case of separating material mixing.
6. REFERENCES: