Financial Analysis - and - Airplane Value Analysis

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 40

Financial Analysis

Aircraft Evaluation
Techniques

BOEING is a trademark of Boeing Management Company.


Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.
Aircraft Evaluation

Equipment analysis Operational analysis

Financial analysis

Market

Considerations Strategic planning

Financing alternatives Other:


Image
Passenger preference
Economic analysis
Flexibility
Reliability

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Agenda

 Financial Evaluation of Projects

 Time Value of Money

 Cost Of Capital

 Value Analysis Example

 Sensitivity Analysis

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Financial Evaluation of Projects

 Basic question
 When it is time to invest in the business, how do we know what is a
good investment and what isn’t?

 Basic answer
 When the return on the investment is higher than the cost of the
money invested.

 How do we measure this?

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Financial Evaluation of Projects

 Estimate relevant cash flows

 Calculate a figure of merit for the investment


 Payback period
 Accounting rate of return
 Profitability index
 Net present value
 Internal rate of return
 Modified internal rate of return

 Compare the figure of merit to an acceptance criterion

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Time Value of Money

An Example Project

100

Cash out -100


50
23 23 23 23 23 23
Cash in
6 x 23 = 138
0
Cash
in and Net cash 38
out
-50

-100 Looks like a


-100
good deal!
-150
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Time Value of Money

To properly evaluate a financial project, the amounts and the timing of


cash flows need to be considered.

Basic relationship: A dollar tomorrow is worth less than a dollar today

Year 1 2 3 4 5 6
Sum
Cash flow 23 23 23 23 23 23 138

Present value
at 10% 21 19 17 16 14 13 100

You could invest 17 dollars today at 10% to receive 23 dollars three years from
now. Seventeen dollars is the present value of 23 dollars three years from now.

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Time Value of Money
The Value of the Project Depends on the Cost of the
Capital Invested
40

30

Net 20

present
value 10

-10

-20

-30
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Cost of money, %

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Cost of Capital

How would an airline calculate its cost of capital?

Typical Typical Overall


airline costs airline mix cost

Borrowed money (debt) 5% – 6%

Interest expense is tax deductible, so interest paid means taxes are reduced.

Debt cost after tax* 3.25% - 3.9% 55% 1.9%

Invested money (equity) 13% – 18% 45% 7.0%

“Weighted average cost of capital” 8.9%

Other adjustments 0.0%

Hurdle rate 8.9%


*Tax rate of 35%

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis - Example

The basic question: How can we compare two alternative aircraft?

The basic answer: By weighing the value each aircraft provides.

We measure the earning power of a capital asset such as a


commercial airplane by estimating its future cash flows and
discounting them back at the airline’s cost of capital.

787-8 767-300ER

Versus

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis - Example
Analysis Groundrules
 10-year study
 10% discount rate
 Pretax analysis
 7,480-km average trip length
 625 trips per year
 Number of seats
 787-8 224 seats
 767-300ER 218 seats
 Age of aircraft
 787-8 new
 767-300ER new
 Aircraft will be leased
 787-8 $1,000,000 per month
 767-300ER $650,000 per month

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis - Example

Passenger Revenue

6 more despill 1.9 more


seats passengers

$.082 yield,

$1,168 more net


revenue per trip
10 years,
10% discount,
$730K more net
2% esc 625 trips
$4.8m revenue per
NPV year
Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.
Value Analysis—Example
Passenger Revenue

Additional seats provide additional opportunity for revenue


generation
Advantage

767-300ER 787-8 767-300ER 787-8

10-year NPV of $366.7M $371.5M $4.8M


passenger revenue*

NPV of: Number of flights x trip length x passengers x yield

*$0.08 yield per rpk, using spill model with passenger demand of 159

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example
The 787-8 Generates $4.8 Million More Revenue Than the 767-300ER
767-300ER advantages 787-8 advantages

Passenger revenue 4.8

Total $0 $4.8M

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example
Cargo Revenue

Increased cargo capacity on the 787-8 provides additional


opportunity to generate cargo revenue

Advantage

767-300ER 787-8 767-300ER 787-8

10 year NPV of
Cargo Revenue* $13.9M $16.3M $2.4M

NPV of: Number of flights x trip length x kg x yield

*yield $2 per kg

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example
Scorecard 767-300ER advantages 787-8 advantages

Passenger revenue 4.8

Cargo Revenue 2.4

Total $0 $7.2M

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example
Fuel Expense

The lower fuel burn and increased speed of the 787-8 generates
value

Advantage

767-300ER 787-8 767-300ER 787-8

10 year NPV of
fuel expense* $107.9M $91.2M $16.7M

NPV of: Number of block-hours x fuel burn per block-hour x fuel price per gallon

*Fuel price of $2.00 per gallon, 787 block time of 8.721 hr, 767-300 block time of 9.159 hr, 15-min ground time

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example
Scorecard 767-300ER advantages 787-8 advantages

Passenger revenue 4.8

Cargo Revenue 2.4

Fuel expense 16.7

Total $0 $23.9M

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example
The 787 is designed for Low Maintenance:
Less Scheduled Maintenance

Longer Check Composite Structure Fewer Maintenance


Intervals  Resists fatigue Tasks
 Twice as long as the  Resists corrosion  Less inspections with
767  30% Fewer tasks composite structures
Less Unscheduled Maintenance

More Reliable More Durable Structure Health Monitoring


Systems  Less accidental damage  System monitoring
 Designed for low life  Easy to inspect  Engine monitoring
cycle costs  Quick repair techniques
 No Pneumatic
system

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example

Maintenance

The 787-8 was designed for low maintenance costs

Advantage

767-300ER 787-8 767-300ER 787-8

10 year NPV of
maintenance* $26.2M $18.0M $8.2M

NPV of: Cost per flight-hour x number of flight-hours

*Includes airframe and engine labor and material for in-house and contract maintenance plus overhead

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example
Scorecard 767-300ER advantages 787-8 advantages

Passenger revenue 4.8

Cargo Revenue 2.4

Fuel expense 16.7

Maintenance 8.2

Total $0 $32.1M

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example

Landing and Navigation

The 787-8 higher MTOW results in higher landing and navigation fees

Advantage

767-300ER 787-8 767-300ER 787-8

10-year NPV of
landing and navigation $26.3M $28.6M $2.3M

NPV of: (Landing fees + navigation fees per flight) x number of flights

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example
Scorecard 767-300ER advantages 787-8 advantages

Passenger revenue 4.8

Cargo Revenue 2.4

Fuel expense 16.7

Maintenance 8.2

Landing/Nav Fees -2.3

Total $2.3 $32.1M

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example

Crew Costs

Increased speed reduces block hours and subsequent crew costs

Advantage

767-300ER 787-8 767-300ER 787-8

10-year NPV of
crew costs* $78.9M $74.5M $4.4M

NPV of: (Flight crew + cabin crew cost per flight) x number of flights

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example
Scorecard 767-300ER advantages 787-8 advantages

Passenger revenue 4.8

Cargo Revenue 2.4

Fuel expense 16.7

Maintenance 8.2

Landing/Nav Fees -2.3

Crew Costs 4.4

Total $2.3 $36.5M

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example

Insurance

The lower insured value of the 767-300ER results in lower insurance


premiums

Advantage

767-300ER 787-8 767-300ER 787-8

10-year NPV of
insurance* $3.5M $5.4M $1.9M

NPV of: Insurance rate x aircraft value

*Insurance rate: .07%

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example
Scorecard 767-300ER advantages 787-8 advantages

Passenger revenue 4.8

Cargo Revenue 2.4

Fuel expense 16.7

Maintenance 8.2

Landing/Nav Fees -2.3

Crew Costs 4.4

Insurance -1.9

Total $4.2 $36.5M

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example

Ground Handling and Power

The slightly smaller 767-300ER generates a minimal cost savings

Advantage

767-300ER 787-8 767-300ER 787-8

10-year NPV of
ground handling $11.4M $11.5M $0.1M
and power

NPV of: Cost per flight x number of flights

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example
Scorecard 767-300ER advantages 787-8 advantages

Passenger revenue 4.8

Cargo Revenue 2.4

Fuel expense 16.7

Maintenance 8.2

Landing/Nav Fees -2.3

Crew Costs 4.4

Insurance -1.9

Ground Handling -0.1

Total $4.2 $36.5M

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example
Passenger Related Costs

The revenue advantage of carrying more passengers is reduced by


the cost of carrying them

Advantage

767-300ER 787-8 767-300ER 787-8

10-year NPV of
passenger related $49.3M $50.0M $.7M
costs

NPV of: Cost per flight x number of flights

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example
Scorecard 767-300ER advantages 787-8 advantages

Passenger revenue 4.8

Cargo Revenue 2.4

Fuel expense 16.7

Maintenance 8.2

Landing/Nav Fees -2.3

Crew Costs 4.4

Insurance -1.9

Ground Handling -0.1

Passenger Cost -0.7

Total $5.0 $36.5M

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example

Cargo Handling Costs

The revenue advantage of carrying more cargo is reduced by


the cost of carrying it

Advantage

767-300ER 787-8 767-300ER 787-8

10-year NPV of
Cargo handling costs $7.8M $9.2M $1.4M

NPV of: Cost per flight x number of flights

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example
Scorecard 767-300ER advantages 787-8 advantages

Passenger revenue 4.8

Cargo Revenue 2.4

Fuel expense 16.7

Maintenance 8.2

Landing/Nav Fees -2.3

Crew Costs 4.4

Insurance -1.9

Ground Handling -0.1

Passenger Cost -0.7

Cargo Handling -1.4

Total $6.4 $36.5M

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example

Schedule Reliability and Maintenance Days

The advanced technology of the 787-8 generates additional revenue


potential as there are less days out of service

Advantage

767-300ER 787-8 767-300ER 787-8

10-year NPV of
$1.9M $1.0M $.9m
Reliability*

* Average per aircraft days out of fleet

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example
Scorecard 767-300ER advantages 787-8 advantages

Passenger revenue 4.8


Cargo Revenue 2.4
Fuel expense 16.7
Maintenance 8.2
Landing/Nav Fees -2.3
Crew Costs 4.4
Insurance -1.9
Ground Handling -0.1
Passenger Cost -0.7
Cargo Handling -1.4
Schedule Reliability 0.9

Total $6.4 $37.4M

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example

Lease Expense

The advantages of the new 787-8 are reflected in a higher monthly


lease rate
Advantage

767-300ER 787-8 767-300ER 787-8

10-year NPV of
lease expense* $48.7M $74.9M $26.2M

NPV of: Initial deposit and monthly lease payments

* 787-8 lease rate of $1,000,000 per month, 767-300ER lease rate of $650,000 per month, 3-month deposit

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example
Scorecard 767-300ER advantages 787-8 advantages

Passenger revenue 4.8


Cargo Revenue 2.4
Fuel expense 16.7
Maintenance 8.2
Landing/Nav Fees -2.3
Crew Costs 4.4
Insurance -1.9
Ground Handling -0.1
Passenger Cost -0.7
Cargo Handling -1.4
Schedule Reliability 0.9
Lease Expense -26.2

Total $32.6 $37.4M

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Value Analysis—Example
Conclusion

Based on this analysis, the New 787-8 generates $4.8 million


more value than the 767-300ER

787-8 advantages $37.4M

767-300ER advantages $32.6M

Net 787-8 advantage $4.8M

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Sensitivity Analysis

It is important to look at the NPV calculations and determine


the critical variables and assumptions that will determine the
project’s success or failure…..
 Passenger and cargo yields
 Load factors and demand
 Discount rate
 Fuel price
 Unit costs
 Monte Carlo simulation

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.


Financial Analysis
Summary
 Time value of money is an important concept for any
investment evaluation

 Financial analysis allows us to systematically compare


aircraft alternatives and identify opportunities

 Sensitivity analysis helps us understand the impact of


changes to key variables

 Financial analysis is one element in the aircraft acquisition


process

Copyright © 2010 Boeing. All rights reserved.

You might also like