Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rule of Law
Rule of Law
Title Page 1
Abstract 3
Introduction 4
Origin 5
Meaning and Concept 7
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:
ORIGIN: The fight for millennia by people to have their inherent rights
recognized has resulted in the rule of law. The notion is extremely old, having
been explored as early as 350 BC by the Greek philosophers Aristotle and Plato.
Many authors' perceptions and interpretations of the rule of law were altered
by the concept, which also altered society's preconceptions. According to Plato,
"it is supreme in nature and nobody is above the law" is the definition of the
rule of law. Law should be the State's ultimate sovereign, according to Aristotle.
German customary law, which emerged as the autonomous source of legal
authority during the Middle Ages, put forth the idea that the King is always
subject to the law John Locke believed the government operated within the
bounds of the law.
3. According to Rule of Law, everyone is equal before the law, i.e. law
cannot be based on a class of persons.
The French term "la Principe de legalite," which meaning a government based
on the principles of law, is where the term "rule of law" originates. One person
who is credited with creating the idea of the rule of law is Edward Coke.
According to him, the King has to submit to both God and the law. Three key
points about the "Rule of Law" were made by Edward Coke. First and foremost,
the Rule of Law is necessary to guarantee that the Crown does not exercise
authoritarian rule; second, it prevents the Government from acting arbitrarily;
and third, it is necessary to safeguard Individuals and their Rights.
6. Law is Supreme
8
The growth of Indian democracy has been greatly aided by the Rule of Law. The
writers of the Constitution incorporated certain provisions from England and
some from the United States of America when they were drafting it. The idea of
the Rule of Law was brought to India by our founding fathers, and the Indian
Constitution contains many of its articles. Nobody is thought to be above the
Indian Constitution, which is regarded as supreme. The Indian Constitution's
Preamble lays forth in unambiguous terms the Concepts of the Rule of Law
found in Part III. The three branches of government in India—the legislative,
executive, and judicial branches—subordinate to the Indian Constitution.
Fairness, equality, and liberty have enhanced it. Equal Protection of the Law
and Equality before the Law are guaranteed by Article 14 of the Constitution.
Every Indian citizen is entitled to fundamental rights under Articles 13, 14, 15,
19, 21, 22, 25, 28, and 31A. Article 32 and 226 of the Indian Constitution allow
a person to file a complaint with the Supreme Court or a High Court if they
believe their rights have been violated. Any law passed by the federal
government or a state government in India must be complied with in line with
the Constitution; otherwise, it will be deemed void. The Supreme Court may
grant writs, such as Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Quo Warranto,
and Certiorari, in accordance with Article 32 of the Constitution. In order to
protect the Rule of Law and stop any laws that go beyond its bounds, the
Supreme Court is also endowed with the authority to conduct judicial reviews.
Federalist Kim Davis lists seven categories of modern law: principles of natural
law, fixed rules and regulations that do away with discretion, due process of
law, preference for judges and the court of law over administrative tribunals
and executive authority, and judicial review of administrative action.
Conclusion: While the concept of the Rule of Law was not without flaws, it
did manage administrative powers and subdued them through its measures,
which is why many nations have accepted the idea of the Rule of Law as the
guardian of the Constitution. To attain the supremacy of law, this is the most
effective instrument. The court has even made an attempt to connect the ideas
of human rights and the rule of law. Since the primary function of
administrative law is to close the gap between power and liberty, David's
modern concept offers a broad concept while also enabling the government to
use it gracefully. Therefore, the government establishes laws and regulations
that respect everyone's right to privacy while adhering to the principles of the
Rule of Law.