Article Citation What is the What larger What methods What are the What What makes this

t are the What What makes this How does this How does this
author’s purpose conversation is does the author author’s main conclusions a credible & article compare article differ
for writing this the research use to collect and supporting does the author relevant source to other articles from other
piece? What need part of? What and analyze arguments? draw? What is for my I’m using? What sources? What
or gap is this literature or data? What What data are the significance research? What terms, new information
research filling? authors does seem to be used to support of their are the author’s information, does this article
How does the the author important data them? How do findings? Do qualifications & methods, and/or provide?
author introduce cite? What are points? How are these support they call for motivations? arguments are
the topic and its some of the the data the main action or How does this similar?
relevance? key topics or analyzed? argument? further contribute
ideas in research? insight into to
discussion my line of
among these inquiry?
sources?
1 The purpose of The author To collect data The author’s -Conclusion of It’s relevant to Articles 1 and 5 Talk about the
the author is to cites: the author main supporting the authors: my research discuss the motivation that
examine Bandura(1997) created a survey argument is that When people because he individuals and rowers have
individual and explains that for rowers individuals and row together in helps to the team, the generally before
group levels to people's between 13 and groups have an a team, how understand and differences, and a race to show
Individual and
determine the confidence in a 18 years old, impact on the confident each demonstrate my the impact of its impact on
Crew Level collective efficacy group comes they needed to performance of a person feels argument, in each on the performance.
Determinants of the sport of from the group complete this team and that in about their own two big parts of performance.
of Collective rowing. itself, not just survey 48 hours rowing especially rowing ability my research,
Efficacy in adding up each before the final there is a can affect how individual
Rowing (P1) person's champion strongest confident they personality and
confidence, regatta. predictor of feel about the team cohesion,
T. Michelle (page 1,2,5) Rowers need to personal whole team's especially in
Magyar, Deborah Moriz and rake between 1 perceptions of ability to row rowing, which is
L. Feltz, and Ian P. Watson (1998) for strongly collective well. This means a sport that is
Simpson demonstrate disagree to 5 for efficacy. that if someone different from
that the team strongly agree is very confident the others.
confidence between (data method in their own
stayed the different and explanation rowing skills,
LINK same questions about pages 5 to 11) they're also
throughout the ego, motivation more likely to
season, but climate, believe in the
different performance, team's ability to
factors and individual row well
influenced it at and collective together.
different times. efficacy. (pages 11)
(page 2)
Feltz and - he finishes his
Lirgg(1998) essay by saying
show that that there are
 collective some issues
efficacy regarding the
emerged as the consensus,
stronger explaining that
predictor of in rowing
performance rowers are not
throughout the part of the
competition same group or
season, boat
(pages 3,11,13) throughout the
and season because
Zacarro(1995) they switch
states that boats a lot of
group size times before
influences the the racing
dynamic and season.
confidence of
the group. (Pages 11 to 14)
(page 2)

2 The author’s The author Here the authors The authors’ The conclusion It's relevant to Articles 2 and 4 Define cohesion
purpose is to cites Carron are studying 196 main argument is that the authors my study both talk about and apply it to
Communication interpret the and Brawley intercollegiate that many factors draw is that the because it shows the importance sport.
in Sports Teams definition of team who have basketball impact sports cohesion of how cohesion of
A Review cohesion and examined the players to show team cohesion one’s team can within a sports communication Also, explain the
apply it to the operational that 80% items but are most of also affect how team can affect but article 2 term cohesion
Andrew W.Ishak sport domain. definition of of cohesion are: the same for the athletes view its performance. talks about but in the aspect
cohesion, attraction to the same sport and the quality of So, I can apply specific ways of of sport and its
4.B Cohesion P14 group, unity of help people their personal that to the case communication, importance.
(Pages 13-16) Carron, purpose, quality individually get development. of rowing. To however article
Brawley and of teamwork, better So, for him high demonstrate 4 talks about
Widmeyer, the and valued roles. perception of how rowing communication
authors cite task cohesion cohesion within in general.
their definition The data are predicted the team
of cohesion analyzed to higher impacts the
and analyze it show what are perceptions of performance
right after the principal personal and and the results
P14 things that social skills, at the end of the
And also, impact cohesion. encouraged season.
Heath (1991) initiative, and
associates the He also finds goal setting
definition of that the within the
cohesion with motivation team. In
his study of climate affects conclusion, it
 languages and cohesion. Task- helps the team
team cohesion involving to have better
in sports. climates results and to
encourage delf- do better
improvement, performance.
support all
members,
encourage
learning from
mistakes, and
reward effort
3 The authors’ The authors The authors The author’s The authors It's relevant for Articles 3 and 4 Goes deep inside
purpose is to cite Elex Sandy identify five main argument is conclude that my study talk the different
Great Teams Are show how to explain what types of team that the drivers individuals’ because it shows complementary kinds of
About important the the different members based of effective team personalities that the because Article 3 personalities,
Personalities, psychological type of degree on their performance are play a individual talks about the and he talks
Not Just Skills factors, here the performance personalities: the group’s significant role personality is drivers of about their
individual are. results-oriented, average level of in determining equally effective team impact on
Dave personalities have relationship- emotional team important as the performance, rowing.
Winsborough an impact on a focused, process intelligence and a performance. In individual and one of those It talks about
and Thomas team. and rule high degree of particular, performance. drivers is a high specific
Chammaro6pre followers, communication personality And that they level of personalities
muzic innovative and between affects, what have an impact communication, that have more
disruptive members. role you have on the team’s the subject that chance to help
thinkers, and The authors within the efficiency. is talked in the team be
pragmatic. They argue that team team, how you Article 4. successful.
explain how performance is interact with
each type not only the rest of the
contributes to influenced by the team, and
Into the Harvard the team and skills and whether your
Business Review how they can experience of values align
create synergy team members, with the team’s
or conflict with but also by their
others. The personalities,
authors provide which affect their
two examples of roles,
teams with interactions, and
different profiles values within the
of psychological team.
roles and how
they affected
their
performance
 and dynamics.
They suggest
that teams
should aim for a
balanced mix of
personalities to
achieve optimal
results.
4 The author’s The authors He is not using The author’s The author It's relevant to Articles 3 and 4 It differs from
purpose is to cite data to state his main argument is concludes that my research talk the other
Sports explain how sport McChesney arguments that the whether it’s a because he is complementary because it talks
Communication and (1989), he is because it is interaction coach going to help me because Article 3 about human
An International communication the one that something that between sport pondering develop my talks about the interaction.
Approach belong together. states that the all humans are and strategy or an argument about drivers of
communication doing in their communication athlete speaking the importance effective team
1.Studying of sports for everyday lives. emphasizes that about the of performance,
communication the benefit of a After all, we all human opponent, every communication, and one of those
and sport mass audience cannot live interaction is sporting event saying that drivers is a high
goes back to alone. centered around involves communication level of
Chuka the 1790s communication. communication. is a human communication,
Onwumechili when the first (p-10)è interaction that a subject that is
sports is used every talked in article
magazine time you are 4.
appeared. part of a group.
(p-9)
5 The author’s N/A Star players The authors’ The authors It's relevant to Articles 1 and 5 Talk about how
purpose is to increase to 12 main argument is conclude that a my research talk about the the importance
There is an I in show people the percent their that there are team with no because it shows individuals and of being a team
Team importance of chances to win a some really good star player but how relation the team, the and not a group
What Elite being a team. championship. players in a team, the same goal between every differences, and of people that
Athletes and but the best and a good person on the the impact of doesn’t share
Coaches Really But the team individuals put relationship team is really each on the the same goal.
Know about needs to support together do not between the important. performance.
High their star players necessarily make people in it
Performance during the for the most could be better
match, so the effective team. than a team
1.Why There Is star payer needs Conflict often with a star
an I in Team to have good arises even as player that
(pages1-25) communication people agree on didn’t have a
with his team. what needs to be good
Mark de Rond done and why. relationship
The productivity with his
of a team teammates.
depends on how
 players are
committed to the
team and how
much effort they
are putting into
helping the team
get better
Article #6
(INCLUDE
CITATION)