CQI-12 Coating System 11-1-12 Final (1) .

You might also like

Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 65

CQI-12v2

Special Process: Coating System Assessment

AIAG Copyright and Trademark Notice:

© 2012 Automotive Industry Action Group, except that copyright is not claimed as to any part
of an original work prepared by a U.S. or state government officer or employee as part of the
person’s official duties.
Except as noted above, all rights are reserved by AIAG and no part of these materials may
be reproduced, reprinted, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any
means, electronic, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission
of Automotive Industry Action Group. Copyright infringement is a violation of federal law
subject to criminal and civil penalties.
AIAG and Automotive Industry Action Group are registered service marks of the Automotive
Industry Action Group. Automotive Industry Action Group makes no claim to any trademark
of a third party. Trademarks of third parties included in these materials are the property of
their respective owners

© 2012 Automotive Industry Action Group

© 2012 Automotive Industry Action Group


ISBN#: 978-1-60534-245-0-90000

CQI-12v2
1
Dated: 2/2012
CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Special Process: Coating System Assessment (General Facility Overview)

Assessment

Question Needs Immediate


Question Requirements and Guidance Objective Evidence N/A Satisfactory Not Satisfactory
Number Action

Section 1 - Management Responsibility and Quality Planning

To ensure readily available expertise, there shall be a


dedicated and qualified coating person on the site.
This individual shall be a full-time employee and the Yes. Dedicated Coating Person(s): Mr.
position shall be reflected in the organization chart. A Pravin Chaudhari (Plant Head) (Work
Is there a dedicated and
job description shall exist identifying the qualifications Ex.:16years in Sheet Metal & Surface
1.1 qualified coating person on-
site?
for the position including chemical and coating Finishing) Mr. Samadhan Jadhav
knowledge. The qualifications shall include a (Production Head) (Work Ex: 5 Years)
minimum of 5 years experience in coating operation or
a combination of a minimum of 5 years of formal
chemical education and coating experience.

The coater shall incorporate a documented advanced


quality planning procedure. A feasibility study shall be
performed and internally approved for each new part
or process. Similar parts can be grouped into part
families for this effort as defined by the coater. After
Does the coater perform Yes. Ref: Feasibility Report Sheet
1.2 the part approval process is approved by the
advanced quality planning?
customer, no process changes are allowed unless Attached
approved by the customer. The coater shall contact
the customer when clarification of process changes is
required. This clarification of process changes shall
be documented.

The coater shall incorporate the use of a documented


Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) procedure
and ensure the FMEAs are updated to reflect current
part quality status. The FMEA shall be written for
each part or part family or they may be process-
Are the coater's FMEA's up to specific and written for each process. In any case,
1.3 date and reflecting current they shall address all process steps from part receipt Yes. PFMEA Attached (QC/FMEA/01-06)
processing? to part shipment and all key coating process
parameters as defined by the coater. A cross-
functional team shall be used in the development of
the FMEA. All special characteristics, as defined by
the coater and its customers, shall be identified,
defined, and addressed in the FMEA.

The coater shall incorporate the use of a documented


Control Plan procedure and ensure the Control Plans
are updated to reflect current controls. The Control
Plans shall be written for each part or part family or
they may be process-specific and written for each
process. In any case, they shall address all process
steps from part receipt to part shipment and identify all
equipment used and all key coating process
parameters as defined by the coater. A cross-
Are finish process Control
functional team, including a production operator, shall
1.4 Plans up to date and reflecting Yes. Control Plans Attached (PRD/CP/01-06)
be used in the development of Control Plans, which
current processing?
shall be consistent with all associated documentation
such as work instructions, shop travelers, and FMEAs.
All special characteristics, as defined by the coater
and its customers, shall be identified, defined, and
addressed in the Control Plans. Sample sizes and
frequencies for evaluation of process and product
characteristics shall also be addressed consistent with
the minimum requirements listed in the Process
Tables.

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Special Process: Coating System Assessment (General Facility Overview)

Assessment

Question Needs Immediate


Question Requirements and Guidance Objective Evidence N/A Satisfactory Not Satisfactory
Number Action

To ensure all customer requirements are both


understood and satisfied, the coater shall have all
related coating and customer referenced standards
and specifications available for use and a method to
ensure that they are current. Such standards and
specifications include, but are not limited to, those
relevant documents published by SAE, AIAG, ASTM,
General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler. The coater shall
Are all coating related and have a process to ensure the timely review,
referenced specifications distribution, and implementation of all customer and
current and available? For industry engineering standards and specifications and
1.5
example: SAE, AIAG, ASTM, changes based on customer-required schedule. This
General Motors, Ford, and process shall be executed as soon as possible and
Chrysler. shall not exceed two weeks. The coater shall
document this process of review and implementation,
and it shall address how customer and industry
documents are obtained, how they are maintained
within the coater, how the current status is
established, and how the relevant information is
cascaded to the shop floor within the two-week period.
The coater shall identify who is responsible for
performing these tasks.
Yes. Required Standards Available
(QC/Supplier TC/01) & Customer Complaint
Register Mantained (DOC FM/QA/05)

The coater shall have written process specifications for


all active processes and identify all steps of the
process including relevant operating parameters.
Examples of operating parameters include process
temperatures, cycle times, load rates, rectifier settings,
Is there a written process
etc. Such parameters shall not only be defined, they
1.6 specification for all active
shall have operating tolerances as defined by the
processes?
coater in order to maintain process control. All active
processes should have a written process specification.
These process specifications may take the form of
work instructions, job card, computer-based recipes, or
other similar documents.
Work Instructions & Standard Operating
Procedures displayed on Plant Floor

To demonstrate each process is capable of yielding


acceptable product, the coater shall perform product
capability studies for the initial validation of each
process, after relocation of any process equipment,
and after a major rebuild of any equipment. The coater
shall define what constitutes a major rebuild. Initial
product capability studies shall be conducted for all
coating processes per line as defined in scope of work
Has a valid product capability
and in accordance with customer requirements.
1.7 study been performed initially All Lab testing reports are attached.
Capability study techniques shall be appropriate for
and after process change?
the coating product characteristics, e.g., coating
thickness, corrosion resistance, etc.. Any specific
customer requirements shall be met. In the absence of
customer requirements, the coater shall establish
acceptable ranges for measures of capability. An
action plan shall exist to address the steps to be
followed in case capability indices fall outside
customer requirements or established ranges.

The analysis of products and processes over time can


yield vital information for defect prevention efforts.
The coater shall have a system to collect, analyze,
Does the coater collect and and react to product or process data over time.
analyze data over time, and Methods of analysis shall include ongoing trend or
Yes. Daily Production Report Mantained
1.8 react to this data? Are records historical data analysis of special product or process (F/PROD/05)
available? parameters. The coater shall determine which
parameters to include in such analysis. All process
control and testing records must be retained for a
minimum of one calendar year after the year in which
they were created.

Are internal assessments


The coater shall conduct internal assessments on an
being completed on an annual Yes. New Plant. Internal Audit Reports
1.9 annual basis, at a minimum, using the AIAG CSA.
basis, at a minimum, mantained Annually (F/QA/27)
Concerns shall be addressed in a timely manner.
incorporating AIAG CSA?

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Special Process: Coating System Assessment (General Facility Overview)

Assessment

Question Needs Immediate


Question Requirements and Guidance Objective Evidence N/A Satisfactory Not Satisfactory
Number Action

The quality management system shall include a


documented process for reprocessing that shall
include authorization from a designated individual.
The reprocessing procedure shall describe product
characteristics for which reprocessing is allowed as
Is there a system in place to well as those characteristics for which reprocessing is Yes. Quality Engineer (Mr. Brijesh Thakkar)
1.10 authorize reprocessing and is not permissible. All reprocessing activity shall require & System is Present. Reprocessing not
it documented? a new processing control sheet issued by qualified allowed
technical personnel denoting the necessary coating
modifications. Records shall clearly indicate when and
how any material has been reprocessed. The Quality
Manager or a designee shall authorize the release of
reprocessed product.

The quality management system shall include a


Does the Quality Department
process for documenting, reviewing, and addressing
review, address, and
1.11 customer concerns and any other concerns internal to 8-D/5Why Analysis (F/QA/06)
document customer and
the coater. A disciplined problem solving approach
internal concerns?
shall be used.

The coater shall define a process for continual


improvement for each coating process identified in the
Is there a continual
scope of the CSA. The process shall be designed to
improvement plan applicable
1.12 bring about continual improvement in quality and Continual Improvement Plan (F/PRD/20)
to each process defined in the
productivity. Identified actions shall be prioritized and
scope of the assessment?
shall include timing (estimated completion dates). The
coater shall show evidence of program effectiveness.

Does the Quality Manager or


The Quality Manager or designee is responsible for
designee authorize the Yes. Quarantine Area avaible in Shed /
1.13 authorizing and documenting appropriate personnel to Rejection Register Mantained (F/QC/01)
disposition of material from
disposition quarantine material.
quarantine status?

There shall be procedures or work instructions


available to coating personnel covering the coating
process. These procedures or work instructions shall
Are there procedures or work
include methods of addressing potential emergencies WI in local language available and displayed
instructions available to
1.14 (such as power failure), equipment start-up, equipment in shop floor. Potential Emergencies traininig
coating personnel that define provided to operators.
shut-down, product segregation (See 2.8), product
the coating process?
inspection, and general operating procedures. These
procedures or work instructions shall be accessible to
shop floor personnel.

The coater shall provide employee training for all


coating operations. All employees, including backup
and temporary employees, shall be trained.
Documented evidence shall be maintained showing
Is management providing Yes. Training Records Available
1.15 the employees trained and the evidence shall include (Doc/HR/06/00)
employee training for coating?
an assessment of the effectiveness of the training.
Management shall define the qualification
requirements for each function, and ongoing or follow-
up training shall also be addressed.

The coater shall maintain a responsibility matrix


Is there a responsibility matrix identifying all key management and supervisory
to ensure that all key functions and the qualified personnel who may
Roles & Responsibilities clearly defined. Skill
1.16 management and supervisory perform such functions. It shall identify both primary Matrix Available (Doc/HR/04/00)
functions are performed by and secondary (backup) personnel for the key
qualified personnel? functions (as defined by the coater). This matrix shall
be readily available to management at all times.

The coater shall have a documented preventive


maintenance program for key process equipment (as
identified by the coater). The program shall be a
closed-loop process that tracks maintenance efforts
Is there a preventive from request to completion to assessment of
maintenance program? Is effectiveness. Equipment operators shall have the
Daily Preventive Mantainence (F/Maint/01).
maintenance data being opportunity to report problems, and problems shall
1.17 Yearly/Montly Tank Mantainence Schedules
utilized to form a predictive also be handled in a closed-loop manner. Company in Place (F/Maint/02)
maintenance program? data, e.g., downtime, quality rejects, first time-through
capability, recurring maintenance work orders, and
operator-reported problems, shall be used to improve
the preventive maintenance program. Maintenance
data shall be collected and analyzed as part of a
predictive maintenance program.

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Special Process: Coating System Assessment (General Facility Overview)

Assessment

Question Needs Immediate


Question Requirements and Guidance Objective Evidence N/A Satisfactory Not Satisfactory
Number Action

Has the coater developed a


The coater shall develop and maintain a critical spare
critical spare parts list, and are
1.18 parts list and shall ensure the availability of such parts Spare parts list attached
the parts available to minimize
to minimize production disruptions.
production disruptions?

Section 2 - Floor and Material Handling Responsibility


Does the facility ensure that
Documented processes and evidence of compliance
the data entered in the
shall exist, e.g., shop travelers, work orders, etc. The Yes. Software provides GRN tracking
2.1 receiving system matches the
facility shall have a detailed process in place to record.
information on the customer's
resolve receiving discrepancies.
shipping documents?

Procedures for part and container identification help to


avoid incorrect processing or mixing of lots.
Appropriate location and staging within the facility also Yes. Raw Material Storage Area/
help to ensure that orders are not shipped until all Finished Goods Area/ Hold/ Rejection
Is product clearly identified
required operations are performed. Customer product
2.2 and staged throughout the
shall be clearly identified and staged throughout the
Area clearly demarked on site. Trolleys
coating process? provided by customer ensure no mixing
coating process. Non-coated, in-process, and finished
product shall be properly segregated and identified. All of parts.
material shall be staged in a dedicated and clearly
defined area.

Out-going lot(s) shall be traceable to the incoming


Is lot traceability and integrity lot(s). The discipline of precisely identifying lots and
2.3 maintained throughout all linking all pertinent information to them enhances the Incoming Inspection Report (F/QA/33)
processes? ability to do root cause analysis and continual
improvement.

The control of suspect or non-conforming product is


necessary to prevent inadvertent shipment or
contamination of other lots. Procedures shall be
Are procedures adequate to
adequate to prevent movement of non-conforming Yes. Hold & Rejection Area present
prevent movement of non-
2.4 product into the production system. Procedures shall along with tagging. Rejection Report
conforming product into the
exist addressing proper disposition, product mantained (F/QC/01)
production system?
identification and tracking of material flow in and out of
hold area. Non-conforming hold area shall be clearly
designated to maintain segregation of such material.

Is there a system to identify


trap points in the entire The coater shall have documented procedures to
process to reduce risk of identify and monitor trap points for each
2.5 Trap Points Report attached (F/QC/02)
mixed parts (inappropriate, process/equipment. Monitoring of potential trap points
unfinished or improperly shall occur for every part changeover.
coated parts)?

Containers handling customer product shall be free of


inappropriate material. After emptying and before re-
using containers, containers shall be inspected to
Are containers free of ensure that all parts and inappropriate material have Customer provided the special trolleies
2.6
inappropriate material? been removed. The source of inappropriate material for handling the parts.
shall be identified and addressed. This is to ensure
that no nonconforming coated parts or inappropriate
material contaminate the finished lot.

Loading parameters shall be specified, documented


and controlled. Examples include parts per rack and
Is part loading specified, Work Instruction boards in local
2.7 load size.
documented and controlled? language available for operators
Refer to Process Tables for frequency of checks.

Unplanned or emergency downtime greatly raises the


risk of improper processing. Operators shall be trained
in material handling, containment action, and product
Are operators trained in segregation in the event of an equipment emergency
material handling, containment including power failure. Training shall be documented.
action and product Work instructions specifically addressing potential
2.8 Yes. Training reports available
segregation in the event of an types of equipment emergencies and failures shall be
equipment emergency accessible to and understood by equipment operators.
including power failure? These instructions shall address containment/reaction
plans related to all elements of the process. Evidence
shall exist showing disposition and traceability of
affected product.

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Special Process: Coating System Assessment (General Facility Overview)

Assessment

Question Needs Immediate


Question Requirements and Guidance Objective Evidence N/A Satisfactory Not Satisfactory
Number Action

Is the handling, storage and The coater's loading/unloading systems, in-process


Dedicated Storage for final goods &
2.9 packaging adequate to handling and shipping process shall be assessed for
chemicals.
preserve product quality? risk of part damage or other quality concerns.

Plant cleanliness, housekeeping, environmental, and


working conditions shall be conducive to controlling
Are plant cleanliness,
and improving quality. The coater should evaluate
housekeeping, environmental
such conditions and their effect on quality. A 5's Training Provided/ Visual Aids
2.10 and working conditions
housekeeping policy shall be clearly defined and present in organisation/
conducive to control and
executed. The facility shall be reviewed for the
improved quality?
following items: loose parts on floor; spillage around
tanks; overall plant lighting; fumes etc.

Process control parameters shall be monitored per


Cleaning Frequencies mentioned in
Are process control frequencies specified in Process Tables. Computer
control plan and monitored by Annual
parameters monitored per monitoring equipment with alarms and alarm logs
2.11 Tank Cleaning Plan ( F/Maint/02).
frequencies specified in satisfy the verification requirement. A designated floor
Control Parameters monitored in daily
Process Tables? person shall verify the process parameters, e.g., by
production plan (F/PROD/05)
initialing a strip chart or data log.

There are documented reaction plans to both out of


Are out of control/specification Daily Titration Report (F/QC/03) & Daily
control and out of tolerance process parameters.
2.12 parameters reviewed and Paint Sample (F/QC/04) Test Report
There is documented evidence that reaction plans are
reacted to? provides cross checking
followed.

Are In-Process / Final Test In-Process / Final Test Frequencies shall be


Pre-Despatch Inspection Report
2.13 Frequencies performed as performed as specified in Process Tables. Refer to
(F/QA/14)
specified in Process Tables? Process Tables.

Test equipment shall be verified/calibrated per


applicable customer specific standard or per an
applicable consensus standard, e.g., ASTM, SAE,
Is product test equipment
2.14 ISO, NIST, etc. Verification/calibration results shall be Yes. All Calibration Reports Available
verified?
internally reviewed, approved and documented.

Refer to Process Tables for frequency of checks.

Lighting in the inspection area must be sufficient to


allow the evaluation of all part surfaces. The lighting
Is lighting of inspection area
2.15 shall be arranged to preclude spot lighting, glare or Yes. Lux Meter available on site.
adequate?
shadows. There can be no moving or distracting
reflections on the surfaces to be evaluated.

Identify operating parameters including:


- number of rinse tanks between process stages,
- tank type (single rinse, counter flowing, stationary
Yes. Process Flow as per Ford Norms
rinse, spray rinse)
Are the water rinse Control attached. Bag Filteration present in all
- flow rate,
2.16 Plans up to date and reflect tanks along with overflows. Inhouse DI
- water requirements (city or deionized water, reverse
best case practices? water plant. Temperature Sensors in
osmosis),
required tanks
- filtration (if applicable)
- control methods
- temperature (if applicable)

Aware of water quality and it's impact on each specific All data recorded Daily titration Report
2.17 Is the water quality adequate? process. Purified water is used where necessary, or (F/QC/03)/ Daily Paint Sample Report
where specified. (F/QC/04)

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Special Process: Coating System Assessment 2nd Edition

Facility Name: Excel Indo-Can Industries


Address: Plot No.E-62, Sanand -II Engineering ,GIDC Sanand, Ahmedabad, Gujarat-382110

Phone Number: 9574314277 Type(s) of Coating Processes at this Facility:


Fax Number: Process Table A
Pretreatment, Aqueous
Number of Coating Employees at this Facility: 12 Process Table B
Pretreatment, Mechanical
Captive Coater (Y/N): Yes Process Table C
Commercial Coater (Y/N): Yes Conversion Coating
Process Table D
Date of Assessment: 05/05/2015 Powder Coating
Process Table E
Date of Previous Assessment: 08/03/2015 Spray
Process Table F
Electrocoat
Process Table G
Dip/Spin
Process Table H
Autodeposition
Process Table I
Cure
Process Table J
Anodizing
Process Table K
Equipment
Process Table L
Part Inspection & Testing
Current Quality Certification(s): ISO 9001: 2008 QMS

Date of Re-assessment (if necessary):

Personnel Contacted:
Name: Title: Phone: Email:
Pravin Chaudhari Plant Mananger 9574314277

Auditors/Assessors:
Name: Company: Phone: Email:

Number of "Not Satisfactory" Findings:

Number of "Needs Immediate Action" Findings:

Number of "Fail" Findings in the Job Audit(s):

Number of Process Table Items not meeting Minimum Requirements:

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


A
P er so n(s)

P lan

availa

No
S
Sur f

A r ea/

pr ese
o per ato r

on
A vailab
(

Rep
A vailab

d
(F/Q A /

attached

D
O

mentioned
FM/

(F/Q C/0 3 )
(F/Maint/0

special

lo c
(F
Br ijes

an

Tr olle

Rep or t
GRN

Co
S

(Q C/F

Repo r ts
A ud it

titr ation
Repo r t
A ttached

in

Visual
ar e

clear ly

Inho use
Repo r t

final
attached
Standar d

Mantain ence

availab le

For d
available
avaible

in

F/Main t/0 2 ).

Insp ection
Impr ovement
&

(DO C
Year s)

pr o vides
r epor ts

A r ea

r epor ts
Stor age

checking
boar ds
(Mr .
Metal
Evidence

A ttached

Inter nal

site.

for
the
A nalysis
Standar ds

Recor d s

P r ovided/
Inspection

per
P r o ductio n

Respon sibilities

Repor t

Calibr ation
to
Co ating

Feasibility

Daily
P lans

Stor age
Man tained

r)t

over flows.
Rejectio n

pr ovided
A r ea

list

Fr equencies
En gineer

P lace
5

(F/Q C/0 1 )
pr ovid ed

5
on
&

as
Meter
language

po
Sheet

D/0
Ex :

testing

Tr aining
Instr uction
Mater ial
Instr uctions

Softwar e
par ts

Flow
cr oss

P r e-Despatch
demar ked

r ecor ded
Re
P lant.

P r eventive
O bjective

8 -D/5 W hy

Tr ainin g

P oints
P FMEA

Contr o l

Q uar antine
(W or k

RO
in
Ded icated

(F/Q C/0 4 )
Requir ed

ation
Con tinual

Tr ain ing
12

In coming

Lux
Ded icated
in

P lan
10

Schedules
Ref:

(F/P
8

P r o cess
Daily

Spar e

A ll
Q uality

pr ovides
6

allowed
Lab

- &

Customer
Ex .:1 6 year s

tr aininig
4

New

local
Register

with
2

par ts.

tained
Raw

Yes.
0

tanks
Hold

Tr ap

Yes.
Titr

Yes.
Head)

Cleaning

Cleaning
Yes.
Yes.

Yes.

plan

a
&

Yes.
A ssessment

A ll

Yes.
Column F

W or k
Column G

Yes.

clear ly

dat
Column H

W or k

Roles

alon g
5 's
in

Daily

Daily
Yes.

Yes.

Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.

Yes.
Yes.

WI

A ll
Re To Th Th Th To Th To Th Th Th Th Th Th Th Th Th Th Th Do Pr Ou Th Th Co Loa Un Th P la Pr Th In - Tes Lig Id e Aw
qui en- e e e en- e de e e e e e e er e e e e e cu oce t- e e nta din pla e nt oce er e Pr t ht - ntif ar e
re su r coa coa coa su r coa mo an coa qu qu coa Qu sh a coa coa coa coa me du go- co coa in - g nn coa cle ss ar e oce eq in g y of
me e ter ter ter e ter nst al- ter al- al- ter al- ll ter ter ter ter nte r es in g ntr ter er s pa- ed ter ' an- co do ss / uip in op wa
nts r ea sh a sh a sh a all sh a r at ysi sh a ity ity sh a ity be sh a sh a sh a sh a d for lot( ol sh a ha ra or s li- ntr cu Fi- me the er - ter
an dil ll ll ll cu s ll e s ll ma ma ll Ma pr ll ll ll ll pr par s) of ll ndl me em loa nes ol me nal nt in - at - qu
d y in - in - in - to ha eac of co na na de- na oce pr ma ha de oce t sh a su s ha in g ter er - din s, pa- nte Tes sh a sp e in g al-
Gui ava cor cor cor me ve h pr nd ge ge fin ger du ovi in - ve vel sse an ll pec ve cu s s ge g/ ho ra d t ll cti pa- ity
da il- po po po r wr i pr od uct me me e a or r es de tai a op s d be t do to sh a ncy un - use me r e- Fr e be on ra an
nce abl r at r at r at r e- tte oce uct in - nt nt pr de- or em n a do an an co tr a or cu me ll do loa kee ter ac- qu ver ar e me d
e e a e e qui n ss s ter sys sys oce sig wo plo r e- cu d d nta ce- no me r be wn din pin s tio en- ifie a ter it's
ex do the the re pr is an nal te te ss ne rk yee sp me ma ev- in e abl n- nte pr sp e tim g g, sh a n cie d/ mu s im
per cu use use me oce ca- d as- m m for e is in - tr ai on nte in - id e r e co d od ci- e sys en ll pla s cal- st in - pac
tise me of of nts ss pa pr ses sh a sh a co r e- str nin sibi d tai nce id e to nfo pr uct fie gr e te vi- be ns sh a ib r be clu t
, nte a a ar e sp e ble oce sm ll ll nti sp uc- g lity pr e n a of ntif the r m- oce sh a d, atl ms, ro mo to ll ate su f - din on
the d do do bot cifi of sse ent in - in - nu on tio for ma ve cr it co ica- in - in g du ll do y in - nm ni- bot be d fi- g: eac
re ad cu cu h cati yiel s s clu clu al sibl ns all tr ix nti ical mp tio co pr r es be cu r ai pr en- tor h per per cie - h
sh a va me me un on din ov on de de im e ava coa id e ve sp a lia n mi od to fr e me ses oce tal, ed out for ap nt nu sp e
ll nce nte nte der s g er an a a pr for il- tin nti- ma re nce hel ng uct id e e nte the ss an per of me pli- to mb cifi
be d d d sto for ac- tim an do pr ov au- abl g fy- in - par sh a p lot( is ntif of d r is ha d fr e co d ca- al- er c
a qu Fail Co od all cep e nu cu oce em tho e op in g ten ts ll to s). nec y in - an k ndl wo qu ntr as ble lo of pr
de al- ur e ntr an ac- ta- can al me ss ent r iz- to er - all anc list ex - av Th es- an ap d of in g r k- en- ol sp e cu s w r in oce
di- ity Mo ol d tiv ble yiel ba- nte for for in g coa ati key e an ist, oid e sar d pr co im an in g cie an ci- to the se ss.
cat pla de P la sat - e pr d sis, d do eac an tin on ma pr d e.g. in - dis y mo op ntr pr d co s d fie me eva tan Pu
ed nni an n is- pr od vi- at pr cu h d g s. na ogr sh a , cor cipl to ni- r i- oll op sh i ndi sp e out d r lu - ks r i-
an ng d pr fie oce uct tal a oce me coa do per A ll ge am ll sh r ec in e pr e tor ate ed. er ppi tio ci- of in sp e ati be- fie
d pr Ef- oce d, sse , in - mi ss nt - tin cu so em me for en- op t of ve tr a ma pr ng ns fie tol Pr cifi on tw d
qu oce fec du the s the for ni for in g g me nn plo nt key su r tr a pr pr e nt p ter i Ex - oce pr sh a d er - oce c of ee wa
ali- du ts re coa an coa ma mu r e- , pr nt - el yee an pr e vel oce cis in - poi al. am ss- oce ll in anc ss sta all n ter
fie r e. An an ter d ter tio m, pr r e- oce in g cov s, d oce the er s ss- ely ad nts A f- ple in g ss be Pr e Ta nd par pr is
d A al- d sh a id e sh a n us- oce vie ss ap er - in - su ss ava , in g id e ver for ter s . sh a co oce pr ble ar d t oce use
coa fea ysi en- ll ntif ll for in g ss- wi id e pr in g clu per eq il- wo or nti- ten eac em in - Op ll nd ss oce s. or su r ss d
tin sibi s su r ha y per de- the in g ng, nti- op the din vi- uip abi rk mi fy- t h pty clu er - be uci Ta ss Re- per fac sta wh
g lity (F e ve all for fec AI tha an fie r i- coa g sor me lity or x in in g sh i pr in g de ato as- ve ble pa- fer an es. ges er e
per stu ME the all ste m t AG t d d ate tin bac y nt of der g lot pm oce an par rs ses to s. ra to ap Th , nec
so dy A) Co r e- ps pr pr e CS sh a ad in per g ku fun (as su c s, of s ent ss/ d ts sh a sed co Co me Pr pli- e - es-
n sh a pr ntr lat of od ve A. ll dr e the so pr p cti id e h etc. lot an or eq be- per ll for ntr mp ter oce ca- lig tan sar
on ll oce ol ed the uct nti Co in - ss- sco nn oce an on nti- par Th s. d co uip for r ac be r is olli ute s. ss ble ht - k y,
the be du P la coa pr ca- on nce clu in g pe el ss. d s fie ts e Ap lin nta me e k tr ai k ng r Th Ta co in g typ or
site per re ns tin oce pa ef- r ns de cu s of to Th te an d to fa- pr kin mi nt. r e- an ne of an mo er e ble nse sh a e wh
. for an ar e g ss bil- for sh a au- to the dis ese mp d by mi cil- op g na- Mo us- d d par d ni- is s. ns ll (s- er e
Thi me d up an in - ity ts. ll tho me CS po pr or a the the ni ity r i- all tio ni- in g loa in t im tor do us be in - sp e
s d en- dat d clu stu Th be r iz r A. siti oce ry qu coa miz sh a ate per n tor co d ma da pr in g cu sta ar - gle ci-
in - an su r ed cu s din die e ad ati co Th on du em ali- ter e ll lo - tin of in g nta siz ter i ma ov- eq me nd r an r in fie
di- d e to to g s coa dr e on nce e qu r es plo fie ). pr ha cati ent oth of in - e. al ge in g uip nte ar d ge se, d.
vid in - the r e- me r el for ter sse fr o r ns pr ar a or yee d Th od ve on in - er po- er s ha or qu me d , d co
ual ter FM flec r eva the sh a d m an oce nti wo s, per e uc- a an for lot ten , Re- ndl oth al- nt ev- e.g. to unt
sh a nal EA t r ef nt in i- ll in a d ss ne rk sh a so pr tio de- d ma s. tial co fer in g er ity. wit id e ,pr e er
ll ly s cu r er - op tial ha a des an sh a ma in - ll nn ogr n tail sta tio Pr tr a nta to , qu h nce AS clu flo
be ap ar e r en enc er - val- ve tim ig- y ll ter i str be el am dis ed gin n oce p in - Pr co al- Th ala tha TM de wi
a pr up t ed at - id a a ely nat oth be al. uc- tr ai wh sh a ru pr g to du poi er s oce nta ity e rm t , sp ng,
full ov dat co sta in g tio sys ma ed er de- tio ne o ll pti oce wit the r es nts sh a ss in co coa s r e- SA ot sta-
- ed ed ntr nd pa- n te nn in - co sig ns d. ma be on ss hin m sh a sh a ll Ta me nce ter an ac- E, lig tio
tim for to ols. ar d ra of m er . di- nce ne sh a Do y a s. in the en ll ll be ble nt r ns sh d tio ISO ht - nar
e eac r e- s me eac to vid r ns d ll cu per clo pla fa- ha be oc- in - s ac- . oul ala n ,in g y
em Th h flec an ter h col- ual in - to in - me for sed ce cil- nce ad cu r sp e for tio d rm pla NIS , r in
plo e ne t d s. pr lect . ter br i clu nte m - to ity s eq for cte fr e n, eva log ns T, gla se,
yee Co w cu r sp e Ex - oce , Th nal ng de d su c loo r e- als the uat ev- d qu an lu - s ar e etc. re sp r
an ntr par r en cifi am ss, an e to ab me ev- h p sol o abi e er y to enc d ate sat - fol- or ay
d ol t t cati ple af- aly r e- the out th- id e fun pr ve hel lity to par en- y pr su c isfy lo Ver sh a r in
the P la or par on s ter ze, pr coa co od nce cti oce r e- p to pr e t su r of od h the we ifi- do se)
po ns pr t s of r e- an oce ter . nti s sh a on ss cei to do ve ch a e ch e uct co ver d. cati ws. -
siti sh a oce qu ava op lo - d ss- A nu of ll s. It tha vin en- ro nt ng tha cks seg ndi ifi- on Th flo
on ll ss. al- il- er - cati r e- in g dis al ad be sh a t g su r ot mo eo t . r e- tio cati / er e w
sh a be Si ity abl at - on act pr cipl im dr e ma ll tr a dis e cau ve ver all gat ns on cal- can r at
ll wr i mi- sta e in g of to oce in e pr ss- in - id e cks cr e tha se me . par ion an r e- ib r be e,
be tte lar tus for pa- an pr du d ov in g tai ntif ma pa t an nt ts in d qui ati no -
r e- n par . use ra y od re pr em po- ne y in - nci or al- of an the the re on mo wa
flec for ts Th an me pr uct sh a obl ent ten d bot ten es. der ysi no d eve ir me r e- vin ter
ted eac can e d a ter oce or ll em in tial sh h anc s s n- in - nt ef- nt. su l g r e-
in h be FM me s ss pr de- sol qu em ow pr i e ar e an co ap of fec A ts or qui
the par gr o EA tho in - eq oce scr i vin al- er - in g ma ef- not d nfo pr an t des sh a dis re
or - t up sh a d clu uip ss be g ity ge the ry for sh i co r m- op eq on ig- ll tr a me
ga or ed ll to de me dat pr ap an nci em an ts pp nti in g r i- uip qu nat be ct - nts
niz par in t be en- pr nt, a od pr d es plo d fr o ed nu pr ate me al- ed in - in g (c-
ati t o wr i su r oce an ov uct oac pr (su yee sec m un - al od ma nt ity. flo ter r e- ity
on fa par tte e ss d er ch a h od ch s on r e- til im uct ter i em A or nal flec or
ch a mil t n tha te af- tim r ac sh a uc- as tr ai dar qu all pr in t al er - ho per ly tio dei
r t. y fa for t mp ter e. ter - ll tiv- po ne y est r e- ov o ha ge use so r e- ns oni
A or mi- eac the er - a Me is- be ity. we d (ba to qui em the ve ncy kee n vie on zed
job the lies h y atu ma th- tics use Id e r an cku co r ed ent pr be in - pin sh a we the wa
de- y for par ar e r es jor od for d. nti- fail d p) mp op . od en clu g ll d, su r ter ,
scr i ma thi t cu r , r e- s wh fie ur e the per leti er - uc- re din pol ver ap fac r e-
pti y s or r en cy- bui of ich d ), ev- so on ati tio mo g icy ify pr es ver
on be ef- par t. cle ld an r e- ac- eq id e nn to on n ve po sh a the ov to se
sh a pr for t Suc tim of al- pr tio uip nce el as- s sys d. we ll pr ed be os
ll oce t as fa h es, an ysi oce ns me sh a for ses ar e te Th r be oce an eva mo
ex - ss- de- mil sta loa y s ss- sh a nt ll the sm per m. e fail cle ss d lu - sis)
ist sp e fin y nd d eq sh a in g ll sta in - key ent for Pr so ur e ar l pa- do ate ,
id e cifi ed or ar d r at uip ll is be r t- clu fun of me oce ur c . y ra cu d. -
nti- c by the s es, me in - al- pr i up, de cti ef- d. du e Tr a de- me me fil-
fy- an the y an r ec nt. clu lo or i- eq an on fec- Cu r es of in - fin ter nte tr a-
in g d coa ma d ti- Th de we tize uip as- s tiv sto sh a in - in g ed s, d. tio
the wr i ter . y sp e fier e on d d me ses (as en me ll ap sh a an e.g. n
qu tte A f- be cifi set - coa go- as an nt sm de- ess r ex - pr ll d , Re- (if
ali- n ter pr cati tin ter in g wel d sh ent fin . pr ist op be ex - by fer ap
fi- for the oce on gs, sh a tr e l as sh a ut- of ed Eq od ad r i- do ecu in i- to pli-
cati eac par ss- s etc. ll nd tho ll do the by uip uct dr e ate cu ted tial Pr ca-
on h t sp e in - Suc de- or se in - wn ef- the me sh a ss- ma me . in g oce ble
s pr ap cifi clu h fin his ch a clu , fec- coa nt ll in g ter i nte Th a ss )
for oce pr c de, pa- e tor r ac de pr tiv ter op be pr al d. e str i Ta -
the ss. ov an but ra wh ical ter - tim od en ). er - cle op sh a W fa- p ble co
po In al d ar e me at dat is- in g uct ess Thi ato ar l er ll or k cil- ch a s ntr
siti an pr wr i not ter co a tics (es- seg of s rs y dis be in - ity rt for ol
on y oce tte lim s nst an for ti- r e- the ma sh a id e po id e str sh a or fr e me
in - cas ss n ite sh a itut al- wh ma gat tr ai tr ix ll nti- siti nti- uc- ll dat qu th-
clu e, is for d ll es ysi ich ted ion nin sh a ha fie on, fie tio be a enc od
din the ap eac to, not a s r e- co (Se g. ll ve d pr d ns r e- log y s
g y pr h tho onl ma of pr mp e Ma be the an od an sp e vie . of -
ch e sh a ov pr se y jor sp e oce leti 2 .8 na r ea op d uct d cif - we ch e te
mi- ll ed oce r el be r e- cial ss- on ), ge dil po sta id e ad ical d cks mp
cal ad by ss. eva de- bui pr in g dat pr me y r tu ge ntif dr e ly for . er -
an dr e the In nt fin ld . od is es). od nt ava nit d ica- sse ad the atu
d ss cu s an do ed, In i- uct not Th uct sh a il- y thr tio d. dr e fol- re
coa all to y cu the tial or per e in - ll abl to ou n Thi ss- lo (if
tin pr me cas me y pr pr mis coa sp e de- e r e- gh an s is in g wi ap
g oce r, e, nts sh a od oce sibl ter cti fin to po out d to po- ng pli-
kn ss no the pu ll uct ss e. sh a on, e ma rt the tr a en- ten ite ca-
ow ste pr y blis ha ca- pa- A ll ll an the na pr coa ck- su r tial ms: ble
led ps oce sh a he ve pa ra r e- sh d qu ge obl tin in g e typ loo )
ge. fr o ss ll d op bil- me pr ow ge ali- me em g of tha es se
Th m ch a ad by er - ity ter oce ev- ner fi- nt s, pr ma t of par
e par ng dr e SA at - stu s. ss- id e al cati at an oce ter i no eq ts
qu t es ss E, in g die Th in g nce op on all d ss. al no uip on
ali- r e- ar e all AI tol s e ac- of er - r e- tim pr No flo nc me flo
fi- cei al- pr AG er - sh a coa tiv- pr at - qui es. obl n- w on - nt or ;
cati pt lo oce , an- ll ter ity ogr in g re em coa in for em sp il
on to we ss AS ces be sh a sh a am pr me s ted an mi er - lag
s par d ste TM as co ll ll ef- oce nts sh a , d ng ge e
sh a t un - ps , de- nd de- r e- fec- du for ll in - out coa nci ar o
ll sh i les fr o Ge fin uct ter qui tiv r es eac als pr of ted es un
in - pm s m ner ed ed mi re en . h o oce hol par an d
clu ent ap par al by for ne a ess Th fun be ss, d ts d tan
de an pr t Mo the all wh ne . ese cti ha an ar e or fail ks;
a d ov r e- tor coa coa ich w pr on, ndl d a. in - ur e ov
mi id e ed cei s, ter tin pa- pr oce an ed fin - No ap s er -
ni ntif by pt For in g ra oce du d in ish n- pr sh a all
mu y the to d, or pr me ss- r es on a ed co op ll pla
m all cu s par an der oce ter in g or go- clo pr nfo r i- be nt
of eq to t d to sse s co wo in g sed od r m- ate ac- lig
5 uip me sh i Ch ma s to ntr rk or - uct in g ma ces ht -
yea me r. pm r ys in - per in - ol in - fol- loo sh a hol ter i sibl in g
rs nt Th ent ler . tai lin clu sh e str lo p ll d al e ;
ex use e an Th n e de et uc- w- ma be ar e co to fu
pe- d coa d e pr as in is- tio up nn pr a nta an me
r i- an ter all coa oce de- su c su e ns tr ai er . op sh a mi d s
enc d sh a key ter ss fin h d sh a nin Co er l ll nat un etc.
e all ll coa sh a co ed an by ll g mp y be e der
in key co tin ll ntr in al- qu be sh a an seg cle the sto
coa coa nta g ha ol. sco ysi ali- ac- ll y r e- ar l fin - od
tin tin ct pr ve A ll pe s. fie ces als dat gat y ish by
g g the oce a ac- of A ll d sibl o a, ed des ed eq
op pr cu s ss pr tiv wo pr tec e be e.g. an ig- lot. uip
er - oce to pa- oce e rk oce hni to ad , d nat me
ati ss me ra ss pr an ss cal sh dr e do id e ed nt
on pa- r me to oce d co per op sse wn nti- to op
or ra wh ter en- sse in ntr so flo d. tim fie ma er -
a me en s su r s ac- ol nn or e, d. in - ato
co ter cla as e sh cor an el per qu A ll tai r s.
mb s r i- de- the oul da d de so al- ma n Th
in a as fi- fin tim d nce test not nn ity ter i seg ese
tio de- cati ed ely ha wit in g in g el. r e- al r e- in -
n fin on by r e- ve h r ec the ject sh a gat str
of ed of the vie a cu s or nec s, ll ion uc-
a by pr coa w, wr i to ds es- fir s be of tio
mi the oce ter . dis tte me mu sar t sta su c ns
ni coa ss A tr i n r st y tim ge h sh a
mu ter .ch a cr o bu - pr r e- be coa e- d ma ll
m A ng ss- tio oce qui r e- tin thr in ter i ad
of cr o es fun n, ss re tai g ou a al. dr e
5 ss- is cti an sp e me ne mo gh de ss
yea fun r e- on d cifi nts d di- ca- di- co
rs cti qui al im cati . for fi- pa cat nta
of on r ed tea ple on. Ca a cati bil- ed in
for al . m me pa mi on ity, an me
ma tea Thi sh a nta Th bil- ni s. r e- d nt/
l m, s ll tio ese ity mu Rec cu r cle r e-
ch e in - cla be n pr stu m or r in ar l ac-
mi- clu r i- use of oce dy of ds g y tio
cal din fi- d all ss tec on sh a ma de- n
ed g cati
a in cu s sp e hni e ll in - fin pla
uca pr on the to cifi qu cal cle ten ed ns
tio od of de me cati es en ar l anc ar e r e-
n uc- pr vel r on sh a dar y e a. lat
an tio oce op an s ll yea in - wo ed
d n ss me d ma be r di- rk to
coa op ch a nt in - y ap af- cat or all
tin er - ng of du tak pr ter e der el-
g ato es the str e op the wh s, em
ex r, sh a FM y the r i- yea en an ent
pe- sh a ll EA . en for ate r in an d s
r i- ll be A ll gi- m for wh d op of
enc be do sp e ne of the ich ho er - the
e. use cu cial er - wo coa the w ato pr
d me ch a in g rk tin y an r- oce
in nte r ac sta in - g we y r e- ss.
the d. ter - nd str pr re ma po Ev-
de is- ar d uc- od cr e ter i r te id e
vel tics s tio uct ate al d nce
op , as an ns, ch a d. has pr sh a
me de- d job r ac be obl ll
nt fin sp e car ter - en em ex -
of ed cifi d, is- r e- s, ist
Co by cati co tics pr sh a sh
ntr the on mp , oce ll ow
ol coa s ute e.g. sse be in g
P la ter an r- , d. use dis
ns, an d bas coa Th d po
wh d ch a ed tin e to siti
ich its ng r ec g Qu im on
sh a cu s es ip e thi al- pr an
ll to bas s, ck- ity ov d
be me ed or nes Ma e tr a
co r s, on oth s, na the ce-
nsi sh a cu s er cor ger pr e abi
ste ll to sim r o- or ve lity
nt be me ilar sio a nti of
wit id e r- do n de- ve af-
h nti- r e- cu r e- sig ma fec
all fie qui me sis- ne in - ted
as- d, r ed nts tan e ten pr
so - de- sch . ce, sh a anc od
ciat fin ed etc. ll e uct
ed ed, ule . au- pr .
do an . An tho ogr
cu d Thi y r iz am
me ad s sp e e .
nta dr e pr cifi the Ma
tio sse oce c r e- in -
n d ss cu s lea ten
su c in sh a to se anc
h the ll me of e
as FM be r r e- dat
wo EA . ex - r e- pr a
rk ecu qui oce sh a
in - ted re sse ll
str as me d be
uc- so nts pr col-
tio on sh a od lect
ns, as ll uct ed
sh po be . an
op ssi me d
tr a ble t. an
vel an In aly
er s d the zed
, sh a ab- as
an ll sen par
d not ce t of
FM ex - of a
EA cee cu s pr e
s. d to dic-
A ll tw me tiv
sp e o r e
cial we r e- ma
ch a eks qui in -
r ac . re ten
ter - Th me anc
is- e nts e
tics coa , pr
, as ter the ogr
de- sh a coa am
fin ll ter .
ed do sh a
by cu ll
the me es-
coa nt tab
ter thi lish
an s ac-
d pr cep
its oce ta-
cu s ss ble
to of r an
me r e- ges
r s, vie for
sh a w me
ll an asu
be d r es
id e im of
nti- ple ca-
fie me pa
d, nta bil-
de- tio ity.
fin n, An
ed, an ac-
an d it tio
d sh a n
ad ll pla
dr e ad n
sse dr e sh a
d ss ll
in ho ex -
Qu Is Do Ar tAhe r Aw r Is Ha
ist Do Ar Is Do Is Do Ar Is Is Is Ha Do Is Is Ar Is Ar Is Ar Is Ar Ar Ar Ar Is Is Ar Is
es- the es e Coe cu es the sto a es e the es the es e ma the the s es pr lot e the e par e the e e e e pr lig e the
tio re the the fin
ntr - all
to re vali
ad the in - re the re the the na re re the the od tr a pr re co t op ha pla pr out In - od ht - the wa
n a coa coa ish
ol c
m oa e a dr de coa ter a Qu a Qu re ge a a coa fa- uct ce- oce a nta loa er - ndl nt oce of Pr uct in g wa ter
de ter ter ' Ppr la tin
r wr i pr
ss ter nal sys al- co al- pr me r e- pr e ter cil- cle abi du sys in - din ato in g cle ss co oce tes of ter qu
di- per s oc
ns. e ang tte tod
he col- as- te ity nti ity oce nt sp ve de ity ar l lity r es te er s g rs , an- co ntr ss / t in - r in al-
cat for FM ss
Sa rde- n uc
ste t lect ses m De nu Ma du pr on nti vel en y an ad m fr e sp e tr ai sto li- ntr ol/ Fi- eq sp e se ity
ed m EA ' mCo p lat
in - pr c
psa- an sm in par al na r es ovi sibi ve op su r id e d eq to e ci- ne r ag nes ol sp e nal uip cti Co ad
an ad s ntle r ed
du oce pa
to d ent pla tm im ger or din lity ma ed e nti- in - uat id e of fie d e s, pa- cifi Tes me on ntr eq
d va up ol
siz an
st r ss bil-
be an s ce ent pr or wo g ma in - a tha fie teg e ntif in - d, in an ho ra cati t nt ar e ol uat
qu nce to P e la
s d
y sp e ity
fol- aly be- to r e- ov de- rk em tr ix ten cr it t d r ity to y ap do ma d use me on Fr e ver a P la e?
ali- d dat ns
an r
doef cifi stlo u ze in g au- vie em sig in - plo to anc ical the an ma pr e tr a pr cu ter i pac kee ter pa- qu ifie ad ns
fie qu e upd e
c r
u - cati dy
w e dat co tho w, ent ne str yee en- e sp a dat d in - ve p op me al kag pin s ra en- d? eq up
d al- an frto e e
m nc e on bed a mp r iz ad pla e uc- tr ai su r pr re a sta tai nt poi r i- nte ha in g g, mo me cie uat to
coa ity d dat
qu ed
nt s for einn ov let e dr e n au- tio nin e ogr par en- ge ne mo nts ate d ndl ad en ni- ter s e? dat
tin pla r e- e e
n- sp
ar e e all pe
cas r er ed r e- ss, ap tho ns g tha am ts ter d d ve in ma an in g eq vi- tor s per e
g nni flec an
c ie cifi
ob - ac- fore tim on pr an pli- r iz ava for t ? list, ed thr thr me the ter i d , uat ro ed r e- for an
per ng tin d
s ctati
ai tiv mca- e e, an oce d ca- e il- coa all Is an in ou ou nt en- al? co co e nm per vie me d
so ? g r e-
for on
ne e pad an an ss- do ble the abl tin key ma d the gh gh of tir e ntr nta to en- fr e we d r e-
n cu r fle
eva c s
d, pr in
bil- i- d nu in g cu to dis e g? ma in - ar e r e- out out no pr oll in pr e tal qu d as flec
on- r en tin
lu - c ur
ho oce tial
ity r e- al an me eac po to na ten the cei the all n- oce ed me ser an en- an sp e t
site t g
ati rwen sse ly
in - act ba- d is nt h siti coa ge anc par vin coa pr co ss ? nt ve d cie d ci- bes
? pr c ur
on thet s? an
dic to sis, it cu s pr on tin me e ts g tin oce nfo to ac- pr wo s r e- fie t
oce r en
of any ed s thi at do to oce of g nt dat ava sys g sse r m- r e- tio od r k- sp e act d cas
ss- prt ar d e af-
fall s a cu me ss ma per an a il- te pr s? in g du n uct in g ci- ed in e
in g pr
oc e ava
ma ter
out dat mi me r de- ter i so d be- abl m oce pr ce an qu co fie to? Pr pr a
? ocss e il-
in - pr
sid a? ni nte an fin al nn su in g e ma ss? od r is d al- ndi d oce ctic
ss-
an abl
tai oc ee Ar mu d? d ed fr o el per uti- to tch uct k pr ity tio in ss es?
in d g e?
ne c ss
us e m, in - in m tha vi- lize mi es in t of od ? ns Pr Ta
pr? Ford c h
t o a r ec in - ter the qu t sor d ni the o mi uct co oce ble
od e
w x -
it mng e or cor nal sco ar a de- y to miz in - the xe seg nd ss s?
uct am
hin e r? ds po co pe nti fin fun for e for pr d r e- uci Ta
ch a ple
t he r e- ava r at - nce of ne e cti m pr ma od par gat ve ble
r ac coa : qui il- in g r ns the sta the on a od tio uc- ts ion to s?
ter - tSA
er , re abl AI ? as- tus coa s pr e uc- n tio (i- in co
is- E,
ho me e? AG ses ? tin ar e dic- tio on n na the ntr
tics A
w I nts CS sm g per tiv n the sys pp eve ol
sh a A
t he G or A? ent pr for e dis cu s te ro nt an
ll cu , r es- ? oce me ma ru to m? pr i of d
als rAe Sn tab ss? d in - pti me ate an im
o TM t lish by ten on r 's , eq pr
be st ,a ed qu anc s? sh i un - uip ov
ad tGe
us r an ali- e ppi fin - me ed
dr e neisr ges fie pr ng ish nt qu
sse eals- . d ogr do ed em al-
d Mo
tab per am cu or er - ity
co tor
lish so ? me im ge ?
nsi e s,
d, nn nts pr ncy
ste For
an el? ? op in -
nt d,
d er l clu
wit an
ho y din
h wd coa g
the tCh
he ted po
mi rrys
el par we
ni le
e var. ts) r
mu nt ? fail
m in - ur e
r e- for ?
Qu Sec 1 .1 1 .2 1 .3 1
qui.4 1
m .5 a 1 .6 1 .7 1 .8 1 .9 1 .1 1 .1 1 .1 1 .1 1 .1 1 .1 1 .1 1 .1 1 .1 Sec 2 .1 2 .2 2 .3 2 .4 2 .5 2 .6 2 .7 2 .8 2 .9 2 .1 2 .1 2 .1 2 .1 2 .1 2 .1 2 .1 2 .1
es- tio re tio 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 tio 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
tio n 1 me n is n 2
n - nts cas -
Nu Ma list cad Flo
mb na ed ed or
er ge in to an
me the the d
nt Pr sh Ma
Re- oce op ter i
sp ss flo al
on Ta or Ha
sibi ble wit ndl
lity s. hin in g
an the Re-
d tw sp
Qu o- on
al- we sibi
ity ek lity
P la pe-
nni r io
ng d.
Th
e
coa
ter
sh a
ll
id e
ntif
y
wh
o is
r e-
sp
on
sibl
e
for
per
for
mi
ng
the
se
tas
ks.
A
P er so n(s)

P lan

availa

No
S
Sur f

A r ea/

pr ese
o per ato r

on
A vailab
(

Rep
A vailab

d
(F/Q A /

attached

D
O

mentioned
FM/

(F/Q C/0 3 )
(F/Maint/0

special

lo c
(F
Br ijes

an

Tr olle

Rep or t
GRN

Co
S

(Q C/F

Repo r ts
A ud it

titr ation
Repo r t
A ttached

in

Visual
ar e

clear ly

Inho use
Repo r t

final
attached
Standar d

Mantain ence

availab le

For d
available
avaible

in

F/Main t/0 2 ).

Insp ection
Impr ovement
&

(DO C
Year s)

pr o vides
r epor ts

A r ea

r epor ts
Stor age

checking
boar ds
(Mr .
Metal
Evidence

A ttached

Inter nal

site.

for
the
A nalysis
Standar ds

Recor d s

P r ovided/
Inspection

per
P r o ductio n

Respon sibilities

Repor t

Calibr ation
to
Co ating

Feasibility

Daily
P lans

Stor age
Man tained

r)t

over flows.
Rejectio n

pr ovided
A r ea

list

Fr equencies
En gineer

P lace
5

(F/Q C/0 1 )
pr ovid ed

5
on
&

as
Meter
language

po
Sheet

D/0
Ex :

testing

Tr aining
Instr uction
Mater ial
Instr uctions

Softwar e
par ts

Flow
cr oss

P r e-Despatch
demar ked

r ecor ded
Re
P lant.

P r eventive
O bjective

8 -D/5 W hy

Tr ainin g

P oints
P FMEA

Contr o l

Q uar antine
(W or k

RO
in
Ded icated

(F/Q C/0 4 )
Requir ed

ation
Con tinual

Tr ain ing
12

In coming

Lux
Ded icated
in

P lan
10

Schedules
Ref:

(F/P
8

P r o cess
Daily

Spar e

A ll
Q uality

pr ovides
6

allowed
Lab

- &

Customer
Ex .:1 6 year s

tr aininig
4

New

local
Register

with
2

par ts.

tained
Raw

Yes.
0

tanks
Hold

Tr ap

Yes.
Titr

Yes.
Head)

Cleaning

Cleaning
Yes.
Yes.

Yes.

plan

a
&

Yes.
A ssessment

A ll

Yes.
Column F

W or k
Column G

Yes.

clear ly

dat
Column H

W or k

Roles

alon g
5 's
in

Daily

Daily
Yes.

Yes.

Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.

Yes.
Yes.

WI

A ll
Re To Th Th Th To Th To Th Th Th Th Th Th Th Th Th Th Th Do Pr Ou Th Th Co Loa Un Th P la Pr Th In - Tes Lig Id e Aw
qui en- e e e en- e de e e e e e e er e e e e e cu oce t- e e nta din pla e nt oce er e Pr t ht - ntif ar e
re su r coa coa coa su r coa mo an coa qu qu coa Qu sh a coa coa coa coa me du go- co coa in - g nn coa cle ss ar e oce eq in g y of
me e ter ter ter e ter nst al- ter al- al- ter al- ll ter ter ter ter nte r es in g ntr ter er s pa- ed ter ' an- co do ss / uip in op wa
nts r ea sh a sh a sh a all sh a r at ysi sh a ity ity sh a ity be sh a sh a sh a sh a d for lot( ol sh a ha ra or s li- ntr cu Fi- me the er - ter
an dil ll ll ll cu s ll e s ll ma ma ll Ma pr ll ll ll ll pr par s) of ll ndl me em loa nes ol me nal nt in - at - qu
d y in - in - in - to ha eac of co na na de- na oce pr ma ha de oce t sh a su s ha in g ter er - din s, pa- nte Tes sh a sp e in g al-
Gui ava cor cor cor me ve h pr nd ge ge fin ger du ovi in - ve vel sse an ll pec ve cu s s ge g/ ho ra d t ll cti pa- ity
da il- po po po r wr i pr od uct me me e a or r es de tai a op s d be t do to sh a ncy un - use me r e- Fr e be on ra an
nce abl r at r at r at r e- tte oce uct in - nt nt pr de- or em n a do an an co tr a or cu me ll do loa kee ter ac- qu ver ar e me d
e e a e e qui n ss s ter sys sys oce sig wo plo r e- cu d d nta ce- no me r be wn din pin s tio en- ifie a ter it's
ex do the the re pr is an nal te te ss ne rk yee sp me ma ev- in e abl n- nte pr sp e tim g g, sh a n cie d/ mu s im
per cu use use me oce ca- d as- m m for e is in - tr ai on nte in - id e r e co d od ci- e sys en ll pla s cal- st in - pac
tise me of of nts ss pa pr ses sh a sh a co r e- str nin sibi d tai nce id e to nfo pr uct fie gr e te vi- be ns sh a ib r be clu t
, nte a a ar e sp e ble oce sm ll ll nti sp uc- g lity pr e n a of ntif the r m- oce sh a d, atl ms, ro mo to ll ate su f - din on
the d do do bot cifi of sse ent in - in - nu on tio for ma ve cr it co ica- in - in g du ll do y in - nm ni- bot be d fi- g: eac
re ad cu cu h cati yiel s s clu clu al sibl ns all tr ix nti ical mp tio co pr r es be cu r ai pr en- tor h per per cie - h
sh a va me me un on din ov on de de im e ava coa id e ve sp a lia n mi od to fr e me ses oce tal, ed out for ap nt nu sp e
ll nce nte nte der s g er an a a pr for il- tin nti- ma re nce hel ng uct id e e nte the ss an per of me pli- to mb cifi
be d d d sto for ac- tim an do pr ov au- abl g fy- in - par sh a p lot( is ntif of d r is ha d fr e co d ca- al- er c
a qu Fail Co od all cep e nu cu oce em tho e op in g ten ts ll to s). nec y in - an k ndl wo qu ntr as ble lo of pr
de al- ur e ntr an ac- ta- can al me ss ent r iz- to er - all anc list ex - av Th es- an ap d of in g r k- en- ol sp e cu s w r in oce
di- ity Mo ol d tiv ble yiel ba- nte for for in g coa ati key e an ist, oid e sar d pr co im an in g cie an ci- to the se ss.
cat pla de P la sat - e pr d sis, d do eac an tin on ma pr d e.g. in - dis y mo op ntr pr d co s d fie me eva tan Pu
ed nni an n is- pr od vi- at pr cu h d g s. na ogr sh a , cor cipl to ni- r i- oll op sh i ndi sp e out d r lu - ks r i-
an ng d pr fie oce uct tal a oce me coa do per A ll ge am ll sh r ec in e pr e tor ate ed. er ppi tio ci- of in sp e ati be- fie
d pr Ef- oce d, sse , in - mi ss nt - tin cu so em me for en- op t of ve tr a ma pr ng ns fie tol Pr cifi on tw d
qu oce fec du the s the for ni for in g g me nn plo nt key su r tr a pr pr e nt p ter i Ex - oce pr sh a d er - oce c of ee wa
ali- du ts re coa an coa ma mu r e- , pr nt - el yee an pr e vel oce cis in - poi al. am ss- oce ll in anc ss sta all n ter
fie r e. An an ter d ter tio m, pr r e- oce in g cov s, d oce the er s ss- ely ad nts A f- ple in g ss be Pr e Ta nd par pr is
d A al- d sh a id e sh a n us- oce vie ss ap er - in - su ss ava , in g id e ver for ter s . sh a co oce pr ble ar d t oce use
coa fea ysi en- ll ntif ll for in g ss- wi id e pr in g clu per eq il- wo or nti- ten eac em in - Op ll nd ss oce s. or su r ss d
tin sibi s su r ha y per de- the in g ng, nti- op the din vi- uip abi rk mi fy- t h pty clu er - be uci Ta ss Re- per fac sta wh
g lity (F e ve all for fec AI tha an fie r i- coa g sor me lity or x in in g sh i pr in g de ato as- ve ble pa- fer an es. ges er e
per stu ME the all ste m t AG t d d ate tin bac y nt of der g lot pm oce an par rs ses to s. ra to ap Th , nec
so dy A) Co r e- ps pr pr e CS sh a ad in per g ku fun (as su c s, of s ent ss/ d ts sh a sed co Co me Pr pli- e - es-
n sh a pr ntr lat of od ve A. ll dr e the so pr p cti id e h etc. lot an or eq be- per ll for ntr mp ter oce ca- lig tan sar
on ll oce ol ed the uct nti Co in - ss- sco nn oce an on nti- par Th s. d co uip for r ac be r is olli ute s. ss ble ht - k y,
the be du P la coa pr ca- on nce clu in g pe el ss. d s fie ts e Ap lin nta me e k tr ai k ng r Th Ta co in g typ or
site per re ns tin oce pa ef- r ns de cu s of to Th te an d to fa- pr kin mi nt. r e- an ne of an mo er e ble nse sh a e wh
. for an ar e g ss bil- for sh a au- to the dis ese mp d by mi cil- op g na- Mo us- d d par d ni- is s. ns ll (s- er e
Thi me d up an in - ity ts. ll tho me CS po pr or a the the ni ity r i- all tio ni- in g loa in t im tor do us be in - sp e
s d en- dat d clu stu Th be r iz r A. siti oce ry qu coa miz sh a ate per n tor co d ma da pr in g cu sta ar - gle ci-
in - an su r ed cu s din die e ad ati co Th on du em ali- ter e ll lo - tin of in g nta siz ter i ma ov- eq me nd r an r in fie
di- d e to to g s coa dr e on nce e qu r es plo fie ). pr ha cati ent oth of in - e. al ge in g uip nte ar d ge se, d.
vid in - the r e- me r el for ter sse fr o r ns pr ar a or yee d Th od ve on in - er po- er s ha or qu me d , d co
ual ter FM flec r eva the sh a d m an oce nti wo s, per e uc- a an for lot ten , Re- ndl oth al- nt ev- e.g. to unt
sh a nal EA t r ef nt in i- ll in a d ss ne rk sh a so pr tio de- d ma s. tial co fer in g er ity. wit id e ,pr e er
ll ly s cu r er - op tial ha a des an sh a ma in - ll nn ogr n tail sta tio Pr tr a nta to , qu h nce AS clu flo
be ap ar e r en enc er - val- ve tim ig- y ll ter i str be el am dis ed gin n oce p in - Pr co al- Th ala tha TM de wi
a pr up t ed at - id a a ely nat oth be al. uc- tr ai wh sh a ru pr g to du poi er s oce nta ity e rm t , sp ng,
full ov dat co sta in g tio sys ma ed er de- tio ne o ll pti oce wit the r es nts sh a ss in co coa s r e- SA ot sta-
- ed ed ntr nd pa- n te nn in - co sig ns d. ma be on ss hin m sh a sh a ll Ta me nce ter an ac- E, lig tio
tim for to ols. ar d ra of m er . di- nce ne sh a Do y a s. in the en ll ll be ble nt r ns sh d tio ISO ht - nar
e eac r e- s me eac to vid r ns d ll cu per clo pla fa- ha be oc- in - s ac- . oul ala n ,in g y
em Th h flec an ter h col- ual in - to in - me for sed ce cil- nce ad cu r sp e for tio d rm pla NIS , r in
plo e ne t d s. pr lect . ter br i clu nte m - to ity s eq for cte fr e n, eva log ns T, gla se,
yee Co w cu r sp e Ex - oce , Th nal ng de d su c loo r e- als the uat ev- d qu an lu - s ar e etc. re sp r
an ntr par r en cifi am ss, an e to ab me ev- h p sol o abi e er y to enc d ate sat - fol- or ay
d ol t t cati ple af- aly r e- the out th- id e fun pr ve hel lity to par en- y pr su c isfy lo Ver sh a r in
the P la or par on s ter ze, pr coa co od nce cti oce r e- p to pr e t su r of od h the we ifi- do se)
po ns pr t s of r e- an oce ter . nti s sh a on ss cei to do ve ch a e ch e uct co ver d. cati ws. -
siti sh a oce qu ava op lo - d ss- A nu of ll s. It tha vin en- ro nt ng tha cks seg ndi ifi- on Th flo
on ll ss. al- il- er - cati r e- in g dis al ad be sh a t g su r ot mo eo t . r e- tio cati / er e w
sh a be Si ity abl at - on act pr cipl im dr e ma ll tr a dis e cau ve ver all gat ns on cal- can r at
ll wr i mi- sta e in g of to oce in e pr ss- in - id e cks cr e tha se me . par ion an r e- ib r be e,
be tte lar tus for pa- an pr du d ov in g tai ntif ma pa t an nt ts in d qui ati no -
r e- n par . use ra y od re pr em po- ne y in - nci or al- of an the the re on mo wa
flec for ts Th an me pr uct sh a obl ent ten d bot ten es. der ysi no d eve ir me r e- vin ter
ted eac can e d a ter oce or ll em in tial sh h anc s s n- in - nt ef- nt. su l g r e-
in h be FM me s ss pr de- sol qu em ow pr i e ar e an co ap of fec A ts or qui
the par gr o EA tho in - eq oce scr i vin al- er - in g ma ef- not d nfo pr an t des sh a dis re
or - t up sh a d clu uip ss be g ity ge the ry for sh i co r m- op eq on ig- ll tr a me
ga or ed ll to de me dat pr ap an nci em an ts pp nti in g r i- uip qu nat be ct - nts
niz par in t be en- pr nt, a od pr d es plo d fr o ed nu pr ate me al- ed in - in g (c-
ati t o wr i su r oce an ov uct oac pr (su yee sec m un - al od ma nt ity. flo ter r e- ity
on fa par tte e ss d er ch a h od ch s on r e- til im uct ter i em A or nal flec or
ch a mil t n tha te af- tim r ac sh a uc- as tr ai dar qu all pr in t al er - ho per ly tio dei
r t. y fa for t mp ter e. ter - ll tiv- po ne y est r e- ov o ha ge use so r e- ns oni
A or mi- eac the er - a Me is- be ity. we d (ba to qui em the ve ncy kee n vie on zed
job the lies h y atu ma th- tics use Id e r an cku co r ed ent pr be in - pin sh a we the wa
de- y for par ar e r es jor od for d. nti- fail d p) mp op . od en clu g ll d, su r ter ,
scr i ma thi t cu r , r e- s wh fie ur e the per leti er - uc- re din pol ver ap fac r e-
pti y s or r en cy- bui of ich d ), ev- so on ati tio mo g icy ify pr es ver
on be ef- par t. cle ld an r e- ac- eq id e nn to on n ve po sh a the ov to se
sh a pr for t Suc tim of al- pr tio uip nce el as- s sys d. we ll pr ed be os
ll oce t as fa h es, an ysi oce ns me sh a for ses ar e te Th r be oce an eva mo
ex - ss- de- mil sta loa y s ss- sh a nt ll the sm per m. e fail cle ss d lu - sis)
ist sp e fin y nd d eq sh a in g ll sta in - key ent for Pr so ur e ar l pa- do ate ,
id e cifi ed or ar d r at uip ll is be r t- clu fun of me oce ur c . y ra cu d. -
nti- c by the s es, me in - al- pr i up, de cti ef- d. du e Tr a de- me me fil-
fy- an the y an r ec nt. clu lo or i- eq an on fec- Cu r es of in - fin ter nte tr a-
in g d coa ma d ti- Th de we tize uip as- s tiv sto sh a in - in g ed s, d. tio
the wr i ter . y sp e fier e on d d me ses (as en me ll ap sh a an e.g. n
qu tte A f- be cifi set - coa go- as an nt sm de- ess r ex - pr ll d , Re- (if
ali- n ter pr cati tin ter in g wel d sh ent fin . pr ist op be ex - by fer ap
fi- for the oce on gs, sh a tr e l as sh a ut- of ed Eq od ad r i- do ecu in i- to pli-
cati eac par ss- s etc. ll nd tho ll do the by uip uct dr e ate cu ted tial Pr ca-
on h t sp e in - Suc de- or se in - wn ef- the me sh a ss- ma me . in g oce ble
s pr ap cifi clu h fin his ch a clu , fec- coa nt ll in g ter i nte Th a ss )
for oce pr c de, pa- e tor r ac de pr tiv ter op be pr al d. e str i Ta -
the ss. ov an but ra wh ical ter - tim od en ). er - cle op sh a W fa- p ble co
po In al d ar e me at dat is- in g uct ess Thi ato ar l er ll or k cil- ch a s ntr
siti an pr wr i not ter co a tics (es- seg of s rs y dis be in - ity rt for ol
on y oce tte lim s nst an for ti- r e- the ma sh a id e po id e str sh a or fr e me
in - cas ss n ite sh a itut al- wh ma gat tr ai tr ix ll nti- siti nti- uc- ll dat qu th-
clu e, is for d ll es ysi ich ted ion nin sh a ha fie on, fie tio be a enc od
din the ap eac to, not a s r e- co (Se g. ll ve d pr d ns r e- log y s
g y pr h tho onl ma of pr mp e Ma be the an od an sp e vie . of -
ch e sh a ov pr se y jor sp e oce leti 2 .8 na r ea op d uct d cif - we ch e te
mi- ll ed oce r el be r e- cial ss- on ), ge dil po sta id e ad ical d cks mp
cal ad by ss. eva de- bui pr in g dat pr me y r tu ge ntif dr e ly for . er -
an dr e the In nt fin ld . od is es). od nt ava nit d ica- sse ad the atu
d ss cu s an do ed, In i- uct not Th uct sh a il- y thr tio d. dr e fol- re
coa all to y cu the tial or per e in - ll abl to ou n Thi ss- lo (if
tin pr me cas me y pr pr mis coa sp e de- e r e- gh an s is in g wi ap
g oce r, e, nts sh a od oce sibl ter cti fin to po out d to po- ng pli-
kn ss no the pu ll uct ss e. sh a on, e ma rt the tr a en- ten ite ca-
ow ste pr y blis ha ca- pa- A ll ll an the na pr coa ck- su r tial ms: ble
led ps oce sh a he ve pa ra r e- sh d qu ge obl tin in g e typ loo )
ge. fr o ss ll d op bil- me pr ow ge ali- me em g of tha es se
Th m ch a ad by er - ity ter oce ev- ner fi- nt s, pr ma t of par
e par ng dr e SA at - stu s. ss- id e al cati at an oce ter i no eq ts
qu t es ss E, in g die Th in g nce op on all d ss. al no uip on
ali- r e- ar e all AI tol s e ac- of er - r e- tim pr No flo nc me flo
fi- cei al- pr AG er - sh a coa tiv- pr at - qui es. obl n- w on - nt or ;
cati pt lo oce , an- ll ter ity ogr in g re em coa in for em sp il
on to we ss AS ces be sh a sh a am pr me s ted an mi er - lag
s par d ste TM as co ll ll ef- oce nts sh a , d ng ge e
sh a t un - ps , de- nd de- r e- fec- du for ll in - out coa nci ar o
ll sh i les fr o Ge fin uct ter qui tiv r es eac als pr of ted es un
in - pm s m ner ed ed mi re en . h o oce hol par an d
clu ent ap par al by for ne a ess Th fun be ss, d ts d tan
de an pr t Mo the all wh ne . ese cti ha an ar e or fail ks;
a d ov r e- tor coa coa ich w pr on, ndl d a. in - ur e ov
mi id e ed cei s, ter tin pa- pr oce an ed fin - No ap s er -
ni ntif by pt For in g ra oce du d in ish n- pr sh a all
mu y the to d, or pr me ss- r es on a ed co op ll pla
m all cu s par an der oce ter in g or go- clo pr nfo r i- be nt
of eq to t d to sse s co wo in g sed od r m- ate ac- lig
5 uip me sh i Ch ma s to ntr rk or - uct in g ma ces ht -
yea me r. pm r ys in - per in - ol in - fol- loo sh a hol ter i sibl in g
rs nt Th ent ler . tai lin clu sh e str lo p ll d al e ;
ex use e an Th n e de et uc- w- ma be ar e co to fu
pe- d coa d e pr as in is- tio up nn pr a nta an me
r i- an ter all coa oce de- su c su e ns tr ai er . op sh a mi d s
enc d sh a key ter ss fin h d sh a nin Co er l ll nat un etc.
e all ll coa sh a co ed an by ll g mp y be e der
in key co tin ll ntr in al- qu be sh a an seg cle the sto
coa coa nta g ha ol. sco ysi ali- ac- ll y r e- ar l fin - od
tin tin ct pr ve A ll pe s. fie ces als dat gat y ish by
g g the oce a ac- of A ll d sibl o a, ed des ed eq
op pr cu s ss pr tiv wo pr tec e be e.g. an ig- lot. uip
er - oce to pa- oce e rk oce hni to ad , d nat me
ati ss me ra ss pr an ss cal sh dr e do id e ed nt
on pa- r me to oce d co per op sse wn nti- to op
or ra wh ter en- sse in ntr so flo d. tim fie ma er -
a me en s su r s ac- ol nn or e, d. in - ato
co ter cla as e sh cor an el per qu A ll tai r s.
mb s r i- de- the oul da d de so al- ma n Th
in a as fi- fin tim d nce test not nn ity ter i seg ese
tio de- cati ed ely ha wit in g in g el. r e- al r e- in -
n fin on by r e- ve h r ec the ject sh a gat str
of ed of the vie a cu s or nec s, ll ion uc-
a by pr coa w, wr i to ds es- fir s be of tio
mi the oce ter . dis tte me mu sar t sta su c ns
ni coa ss A tr i n r st y tim ge h sh a
mu ter .ch a cr o bu - pr r e- be coa e- d ma ll
m A ng ss- tio oce qui r e- tin thr in ter i ad
of cr o es fun n, ss re tai g ou a al. dr e
5 ss- is cti an sp e me ne mo gh de ss
yea fun r e- on d cifi nts d di- ca- di- co
rs cti qui al im cati . for fi- pa cat nta
of on r ed tea ple on. Ca a cati bil- ed in
for al . m me pa mi on ity, an me
ma tea Thi sh a nta Th bil- ni s. r e- d nt/
l m, s ll tio ese ity mu Rec cu r cle r e-
ch e in - cla be n pr stu m or r in ar l ac-
mi- clu r i- use of oce dy of ds g y tio
cal din fi- d all ss tec on sh a ma de- n
ed g cati
a in cu s sp e hni e ll in - fin pla
uca pr on the to cifi qu cal cle ten ed ns
tio od of de me cati es en ar l anc ar e r e-
n uc- pr vel r on sh a dar y e a. lat
an tio oce op an s ll yea in - wo ed
d n ss me d ma be r di- rk to
coa op ch a nt in - y ap af- cat or all
tin er - ng of du tak pr ter e der el-
g ato es the str e op the wh s, em
ex r, sh a FM y the r i- yea en an ent
pe- sh a ll EA . en for ate r in an d s
r i- ll be A ll gi- m for wh d op of
enc be do sp e ne of the ich ho er - the
e. use cu cial er - wo coa the w ato pr
d me ch a in g rk tin y an r- oce
in nte r ac sta in - g we y r e- ss.
the d. ter - nd str pr re ma po Ev-
de is- ar d uc- od cr e ter i r te id e
vel tics s tio uct ate al d nce
op , as an ns, ch a d. has pr sh a
me de- d job r ac be obl ll
nt fin sp e car ter - en em ex -
of ed cifi d, is- r e- s, ist
Co by cati co tics pr sh a sh
ntr the on mp , oce ll ow
ol coa s ute e.g. sse be in g
P la ter an r- , d. use dis
ns, an d bas coa Th d po
wh d ch a ed tin e to siti
ich its ng r ec g Qu im on
sh a cu s es ip e thi al- pr an
ll to bas s, ck- ity ov d
be me ed or nes Ma e tr a
co r s, on oth s, na the ce-
nsi sh a cu s er cor ger pr e abi
ste ll to sim r o- or ve lity
nt be me ilar sio a nti of
wit id e r- do n de- ve af-
h nti- r e- cu r e- sig ma fec
all fie qui me sis- ne in - ted
as- d, r ed nts tan e ten pr
so - de- sch . ce, sh a anc od
ciat fin ed etc. ll e uct
ed ed, ule . au- pr .
do an . An tho ogr
cu d Thi y r iz am
me ad s sp e e .
nta dr e pr cifi the Ma
tio sse oce c r e- in -
n d ss cu s lea ten
su c in sh a to se anc
h the ll me of e
as FM be r r e- dat
wo EA . ex - r e- pr a
rk ecu qui oce sh a
in - ted re sse ll
str as me d be
uc- so nts pr col-
tio on sh a od lect
ns, as ll uct ed
sh po be . an
op ssi me d
tr a ble t. an
vel an In aly
er s d the zed
, sh a ab- as
an ll sen par
d not ce t of
FM ex - of a
EA cee cu s pr e
s. d to dic-
A ll tw me tiv
sp e o r e
cial we r e- ma
ch a eks qui in -
r ac . re ten
ter - Th me anc
is- e nts e
tics coa , pr
, as ter the ogr
de- sh a coa am
fin ll ter .
ed do sh a
by cu ll
the me es-
coa nt tab
ter thi lish
an s ac-
d pr cep
its oce ta-
cu s ss ble
to of r an
me r e- ges
r s, vie for
sh a w me
ll an asu
be d r es
id e im of
nti- ple ca-
fie me pa
d, nta bil-
de- tio ity.
fin n, An
ed, an ac-
an d it tio
d sh a n
ad ll pla
dr e ad n
sse dr e sh a
d ss ll
in ho ex -
Qu Is Do Ar tAhe r Aw r Is Ha
ist Do Ar Is Do Is Do Ar Is Is Is Ha Do Is Is Ar Is Ar Is Ar Is Ar Ar Ar Ar Is Is Ar Is
es- the es e Coe cu es the sto a es e the es the es e ma the the s es pr lot e the e par e the e e e e pr lig e the
tio re the the fin
ntr - all
to re vali
ad the in - re the re the the na re re the the od tr a pr re co t op ha pla pr out In - od ht - the wa
n a coa coa ish
ol c
m oa e a dr de coa ter a Qu a Qu re ge a a coa fa- uct ce- oce a nta loa er - ndl nt oce of Pr uct in g wa ter
de ter ter ' Ppr la tin
r wr i pr
ss ter nal sys al- co al- pr me r e- pr e ter cil- cle abi du sys in - din ato in g cle ss co oce tes of ter qu
di- per s oc
ns. e ang tte tod
he col- as- te ity nti ity oce nt sp ve de ity ar l lity r es te er s g rs , an- co ntr ss / t in - r in al-
cat for FM ss
Sa rde- n uc
ste t lect ses m De nu Ma du pr on nti vel en y an ad m fr e sp e tr ai sto li- ntr ol/ Fi- eq sp e se ity
ed m EA ' mCo p lat
in - pr c
psa- an sm in par al na r es ovi sibi ve op su r id e d eq to e ci- ne r ag nes ol sp e nal uip cti Co ad
an ad s ntle r ed
du oce pa
to d ent pla tm im ger or din lity ma ed e nti- in - uat id e of fie d e s, pa- cifi Tes me on ntr eq
d va up ol
siz an
st r ss bil-
be an s ce ent pr or wo g ma in - a tha fie teg e ntif in - d, in an ho ra cati t nt ar e ol uat
qu nce to P e la
s d
y sp e ity
fol- aly be- to r e- ov de- rk em tr ix ten cr it t d r ity to y ap do ma d use me on Fr e ver a P la e?
ali- d dat ns
an r
doef cifi stlo u ze in g au- vie em sig in - plo to anc ical the an ma pr e tr a pr cu ter i pac kee ter pa- qu ifie ad ns
fie qu e upd e
c r
u - cati dy
w e dat co tho w, ent ne str yee en- e sp a dat d in - ve p op me al kag pin s ra en- d? eq up
d al- an frto e e
m nc e on bed a mp r iz ad pla e uc- tr ai su r pr re a sta tai nt poi r i- nte ha in g g, mo me cie uat to
coa ity d dat
qu ed
nt s for einn ov let e dr e n au- tio nin e ogr par en- ge ne mo nts ate d ndl ad en ni- ter s e? dat
tin pla r e- e e
n- sp
ar e e all pe
cas r er ed r e- ss, ap tho ns g tha am ts ter d d ve in ma an in g eq vi- tor s per e
g nni flec an
c ie cifi
ob - ac- fore tim on pr an pli- r iz ava for t ? list, ed thr thr me the ter i d , uat ro ed r e- for an
per ng tin d
s ctati
ai tiv mca- e e, an oce d ca- e il- coa all Is an in ou ou nt en- al? co co e nm per vie me d
so ? g r e-
for on
ne e pad an an ss- do ble the abl tin key ma d the gh gh of tir e ntr nta to en- fr e we d r e-
n cu r fle
eva c s
d, pr in
bil- i- d nu in g cu to dis e g? ma in - ar e r e- out out no pr oll in pr e tal qu d as flec
on- r en tin
lu - c ur
ho oce tial
ity r e- al an me eac po to na ten the cei the all n- oce ed me ser an en- an sp e t
site t g
ati rwen sse ly
in - act ba- d is nt h siti coa ge anc par vin coa pr co ss ? nt ve d cie d ci- bes
? pr c ur
on thet s? an
dic to sis, it cu s pr on tin me e ts g tin oce nfo to ac- pr wo s r e- fie t
oce r en
of any ed s thi at do to oce of g nt dat ava sys g sse r m- r e- tio od r k- sp e act d cas
ss- prt ar d e af-
fall s a cu me ss ma per an a il- te pr s? in g du n uct in g ci- ed in e
in g pr
oc e ava
ma ter
out dat mi me r de- ter i so d be- abl m oce pr ce an qu co fie to? Pr pr a
? ocss e il-
in - pr
sid a? ni nte an fin al nn su in g e ma ss? od r is d al- ndi d oce ctic
ss-
an abl
tai oc ee Ar mu d? d ed fr o el per uti- to tch uct k pr ity tio in ss es?
in d g e?
ne c ss
us e m, in - in m tha vi- lize mi es in t of od ? ns Pr Ta
pr? Ford c h
t o a r ec in - ter the qu t sor d ni the o mi uct co oce ble
od e
w x -
it mng e or cor nal sco ar a de- y to miz in - the xe seg nd ss s?
uct am
hin e r? ds po co pe nti fin fun for e for pr d r e- uci Ta
ch a ple
t he r e- ava r at - nce of ne e cti m pr ma od par gat ve ble
r ac coa : qui il- in g r ns the sta the on a od tio uc- ts ion to s?
ter - tSA
er , re abl AI ? as- tus coa s pr e uc- n tio (i- in co
is- E,
ho me e? AG ses ? tin ar e dic- tio on n na the ntr
tics A
w I nts CS sm g per tiv n the sys pp eve ol
sh a A
t he G or A? ent pr for e dis cu s te ro nt an
ll cu , r es- ? oce me ma ru to m? pr i of d
als rAe Sn tab ss? d in - pti me ate an im
o TM t lish by ten on r 's , eq pr
be st ,a ed qu anc s? sh i un - uip ov
ad tGe
us r an ali- e ppi fin - me ed
dr e neisr ges fie pr ng ish nt qu
sse eals- . d ogr do ed em al-
d Mo
tab per am cu or er - ity
co tor
lish so ? me im ge ?
nsi e s,
d, nn nts pr ncy
ste For
an el? ? op in -
nt d,
d er l clu
wit an
ho y din
h wd coa g
the tCh
he ted po
mi rrys
el par we
ni le
e var. ts) r
mu nt ? fail
m in - ur e
r e- for ?
Qu Sec 1 .1 1 .2 1 .3 1
qui.4 1
m .5 a 1 .6 1 .7 1 .8 1 .9 1 .1 1 .1 1 .1 1 .1 1 .1 1 .1 1 .1 1 .1 1 .1 Sec 2 .1 2 .2 2 .3 2 .4 2 .5 2 .6 2 .7 2 .8 2 .9 2 .1 2 .1 2 .1 2 .1 2 .1 2 .1 2 .1 2 .1
es- tio re tio 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 tio 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
tio n 1 me n is n 2
n - nts cas -
Nu Ma list cad Flo
mb na ed ed or
er ge in to an
me the the d
nt Pr sh Ma
Re- oce op ter i
sp ss flo al
on Ta or Ha
sibi ble wit ndl
lity s. hin in g
an the Re-
d tw sp
Qu o- on
al- we sibi
ity ek lity
P la pe-
nni r io
ng d.
Th
e
coa
ter
sh a
ll
id e
ntif
y
wh
o is
r e-
sp
on
sibl
e
for
per
for
mi
ng
the
se
tas
ks.
CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Section 3 - Job Audit - Finished Product Review

Job Identity:
Customer:
Shop Order Number:
Part Number:
Part Description:
Coating Requirements:

Related Customer or Internal Job (Shop) Order or Reference Actual Condition Pass / Fail
Question # Job Audit Question
CSA Question # Requirement Documentation Requirement (Objective Evidence) / N/A

1.1
Is contract review and advanced quality 1.2
3.1 planning, FMEA, Control Plans, etc., 1.3 N/A
performed by qualified individuals? 1.4
1.6

Does the coater have the proper customer


3.2 1.5 N/A
specifications for the part?

Is a shop traveler created to meet 1.6


3.3
customer requirements? 2.1

Is material identification (part numbers, lot


2.2
numbers, contract numbers, etc.)
3.4 2.3
maintained throughout the coating
2.4
process?

Is there documented evidence of


3.5 2.1
Receiving Inspection?

1.6
Are the Loading / Racking requirements
3.6 2.7
identified?
2.9

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Section 3 - Job Audit - Finished Product Review

Job Identity:
Customer:
Shop Order Number:
Part Number:
Part Description:
Coating Requirements:

Related Customer or Internal Job (Shop) Order or Reference Actual Condition Pass / Fail
Question # Job Audit Question
CSA Question # Requirement Documentation Requirement (Objective Evidence) / N/A

Is the proper procedure or process 1.5


specification used? Refer to Process 1.6
3.7 Tables for specific parameters. List 2.1
parameters that were verified in this audit 2.11
in the spaces provided below. 2.13

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Section 3 - Job Audit - Finished Product Review

Job Identity:
Customer:
Shop Order Number:
Part Number:
Part Description:
Coating Requirements:

Related Customer or Internal Job (Shop) Order or Reference Actual Condition Pass / Fail
Question # Job Audit Question
CSA Question # Requirement Documentation Requirement (Objective Evidence) / N/A

Each part may have one or more requirements determined by the coating specification.
What are the product inspection 1.5
3.8 Parts must meet each requirement. List each requirement below and validate.
requirements? 2.13 2.14
(Listed below are some examples)

3.8.1 Requirement: Coating Thickness

Test Method:
Test frequency or quantity:
Selection of samples:
Specification:
Requirement: Corrosion Resistance (if
3.8.2
applicable)
Test Method(s):
Test frequency or quantity:
Selection of samples:
Specification:

Requirement: Hydrogen Embrittlement


3.8.3
Relief (if applicable)

Test Method:

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Section 3 - Job Audit - Finished Product Review

Job Identity:
Customer:
Shop Order Number:
Part Number:
Part Description:
Coating Requirements:

Related Customer or Internal Job (Shop) Order or Reference Actual Condition Pass / Fail
Question # Job Audit Question
CSA Question # Requirement Documentation Requirement (Objective Evidence) / N/A

Test frequency or quantity:


Selection of samples:
Specification:
3.8.4 Requirement: Adhesion
Test Method(s):
Test frequency or quantity:
Selection of samples:
Specification:
3.8.5 Requirement: Cure
Test Method:
Test frequency or quantity:
Selection of samples:
Specification:
Requirement: Torque Tension
3.8.6
(if applicable)
Test Method:
Test frequency or quantity:

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Section 3 - Job Audit - Finished Product Review

Job Identity:
Customer:
Shop Order Number:
Part Number:
Part Description:
Coating Requirements:

Related Customer or Internal Job (Shop) Order or Reference Actual Condition Pass / Fail
Question # Job Audit Question
CSA Question # Requirement Documentation Requirement (Objective Evidence) / N/A

Selection of samples:

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Section 3 - Job Audit - Finished Product Review

Job Identity:
Customer:
Shop Order Number:
Part Number:
Part Description:
Coating Requirements:

Related Customer or Internal Job (Shop) Order or Reference Actual Condition Pass / Fail
Question # Job Audit Question
CSA Question # Requirement Documentation Requirement (Objective Evidence) / N/A

Specification:
3.8.7 Requirement: Appearance (Decorative)
Test Method:
Test frequency or quantity:
Selection of samples:
Specification:
Requirement: Dimensional
3.8.8
(if applicable)
Test Method:
Test frequency or quantity:
Selection of samples:
Specification:
Requirement: Color and Gloss
3.8.9
(Decorative)
Test Method:
Test frequency or quantity:
Selection of samples:
Specification:

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Section 3 - Job Audit - Finished Product Review

Job Identity:
Customer:
Shop Order Number:
Part Number:
Part Description:
Coating Requirements:

Related Customer or Internal Job (Shop) Order or Reference Actual Condition Pass / Fail
Question # Job Audit Question
CSA Question # Requirement Documentation Requirement (Objective Evidence) / N/A

3.8.10 Requirement: Customer Specific


Test Method(s):
Test frequency or quantity:
Selection of samples:
Specification:
Operator or Inspector Responsibilities

1.4
1.6
Were appropriate process steps signed
3.9 2.2
off?
2.3
2.11

Were all inspection steps, as documented 1.2


3.10
in the Control Plan performed? 1.4

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Section 3 - Job Audit - Finished Product Review

Job Identity:
Customer:
Shop Order Number:
Part Number:
Part Description:
Coating Requirements:

Related Customer or Internal Job (Shop) Order or Reference Actual Condition Pass / Fail
Question # Job Audit Question
CSA Question # Requirement Documentation Requirement (Objective Evidence) / N/A

1.2
Were steps/operations performed that
3.11 1.4
were not documented in the Control Plan?
1.6

1.2
1.4
If additional steps were performed, were
3.12 1.6
they authorized?
1.10
1.16

Does the governing specification allow 1.5


3.13
reprocessing or rework? 1.10

If the order was certified, did the


2.11
3.14 certification accurately reflect the process
2.13
performed?

Was the certification signed by an


3.15 1.16
authorized individual?

Are the parts and containers free of


3.16 2.6
inappropriate objects or contamination?

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

Section 3 - Job Audit - Finished Product Review

Job Identity:
Customer:
Shop Order Number:
Part Number:
Part Description:
Coating Requirements:

Related Customer or Internal Job (Shop) Order or Reference Actual Condition Pass / Fail
Question # Job Audit Question
CSA Question # Requirement Documentation Requirement (Objective Evidence) / N/A

Packaging Requirements

2.6
3.17 Are packaging requirements identified? 2.7
2.9

Are parts packaged to minimize mixed 2.6


3.18 parts (for example, parts packed over 2.7
height of container)? 2.9

Shipping Requirements

2.3
3.19 Were the parts properly identified?
2.9
2.3
3.20 Were the containers properly labeled?
2.9

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE A - Pretreatment (Aqueous)

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum
Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)
Requirement

1.0 AQUEOUS CLEANING PROCESS (Alkaline or Acid)

Inward Material
There shall be an incoming part assessment procedure 100 % Incoming
A1.1 1.4 Per Control Plan Inspection Sheet ref Once per lot and per part change Pass
with criteria. Inspection (F/QA/33)
control pan

Automatic Line: Confirm set-up at the start


of production and every process change.
1.4 Manually verify every 3 months or after Automatic line with PLC
1.6 programming change or equipment Programming. Daily
A1.2 Time Automatic/Manual automatic Pass
2.11 maintenance. Production Report
2.12 (F/PROD/05)
Manual Line: Continuously monitor time in
each stage of process.

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE A - Pretreatment (Aqueous)

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum
Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)
Requirement

2.0 Cleaning / Descaling Solution

1.4 Circulation with Pumps


Pressure for spray rinse.
A2.1 2.11 Automatic/Manual automatic Once every 8 hours having 3-4 turnovers per Pass
Agitation for immersion tanks.
2.12 hour

1.4 Automatic Temperature


Continuous monitoring by controller.
A2.2 2.11 Temperature Automatic automatic Controllers. Document Pass
Manually verify daily.
2.12 (F/PROD/05)

Chemical Concentration (Alkaline Cleaner) (If used)


Per chemical supplier recommendation such as:
1.4 - free alkalinity
For continuous operations, once per day. once per shift.
1.6 - total alkalinity
A2.3 Automatic/Manual manual Otherwise, prior to start of each production Document.Daily Titration Pass
2.11 - pH
cycle. Report (F/QC/03)
2.12 - conductivity
- percentage of cleaner (weight/volume or
volume/volume)

1.4 Chemical Concentration (Acid Cleaner) (If used) For continuous operations, once per day.
once per shift.
1.6 Per chemical supplier recommendation such as: Otherwise, prior to start of each production
A2.4 Automatic/Manual manual Document.Daily Titration Pass
2.11 - free acidity or concentration day. (once per day for concentration, once
Report (F/QC/03)
2.12 - metal contamination per month for contamination).

Impurity Content
1.4 Daily Ratio's mantained
Per chemical supplier recommendation such as:
A2.5 2.11 Manual manual Once per week* as per Daily Titration Pass
- acid split (oil contamination)
2.12 Report (F/QC/03)
- alkalinity ratio

There is a tank maintenance schedule for cleaning as per PM shedule


A2.6 2.11 Manual manual Per preventative maintenance program Pass
baths. (F/Maint/02)

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE A - Pretreatment (Aqueous)

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum
Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)
Requirement

3.0 Rinse(s)

1.4
Pressure for spray rinse. Continuous pneumatic
A3.1 2.11 Automatic/Manual automatic Once every 8 hours Pass
Agitation or flow for immersion tanks. agitation
2.12

Rinses Mantained at
1.4
Continuous monitoring by controller. Room Temperature as
A3.2 2.11 Temperature (if controlled) Automatic Not Controlled Pass
Manually verify once per day. per supplier
2.12
recommendation

Cleanliness of last cleaner rinse


1.4 once per shift.
- alkalinity/pH/conductivity
A3.3 2.11 Manual manual Once per day Document.Daily Titration Pass
- visual inspection for oil or suspended contaminants
2.12 Report (F/QC/03)
- overflow

as per PM shedule
A3.4 2.11 There is a dump schedule for rinses. Manual manual Per preventative maintenance schedule. Pass
(F/Maint/02)

There is a visual inspection (e.g. water break) after Once per shift/ Change
1.4
A3.5 each post cleaning rinse bath (not applicable for closed Manual manual Once every 8 hours of Product. Visual Pass
2.11
barrel systems). Inspection
1.4
A3.6 Corrosion inhibitor concentration is checked. (If used) Automatic/Manual N/A Once every 8 hours N/A N/A
2.11

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE A - Pretreatment (Aqueous)

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum
Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)
Requirement

4.0 Acid Pickling

1.4 once per shift.


A4.1 2.11 Concentration Manual manual Once every 8 hours Document.Daily Titration Pass
2.13 Report (F/QC/03)

Checked as Total Acid in


1.4
Tank. As per Daily
A4.2 2.11 Concentration of Fe, per coating supplier. Manual manual Once per day Pass
Titration Report
2.12
(F/QC/03)

1.4
A4.3 2.11 Inhibitor (if used) Manual N/A N/A N/A N/A
2.12
1.4
A4.4 2.11 Solution Level Manual manual Once every 8 hours At the start of each shift Pass
2.12

A4.5 Rinse - See Section 3.0.

5.0 Aluminum Etching

1.4
A5.1 2.11 Concentration Manual N/A Once every 8 hours N/A N/A
2.12

1.4
A5.2 2.11 Concentrations of Al, per coating supplier. Manual N/A Once per day N/A N/A
2.12

A5.3 Rinse - See Section 3.0.

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE A - Pretreatment (Aqueous)

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum
Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)
Requirement

6.0 Aluminum Deoxidizing

1.4
A6.1 2.11 Concentration Manual N/A Once every 8 hours N/A N/A
2.12

1.4
A6.2 2.11 Concentrations of Al, per coating supplier. Manual N/A Once per day N/A N/A
2.12

A6.3 Rinse - See Section 3.0.

7.0 Sealing Rinse (if applicable)


Sealer Rinse mantained
1.4
at Room Temperature as
A7.1 2.11 Temperature (if applicable) Automatic Not Controlled Manually measure once every 8 hours Pass
per Supplier
2.13
Recommendation

1.4 once per shift.


A7.2 2.11 Concentration Manual N/A Once every 8 hours Document.Daily Titration Pass
2.12 Report (F/QC/03)

1.4
A7.3 2.11 Solution Level Manual N/A Once every 8 hours At the start of each shift Pass
2.12

A7.4 Rinse - See Section 3.0.

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE B - Pretreatment (Mechanical)

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

1.0 ABRASIVE BLAST PROCESS

There shall be an incoming part assessment procedure


B1.1 1.4 with criteria. (Parts have been pre-cleaned and are free Manual Per load
of oil and grease contaminations).

The following checks shall be performed during


B1.2 2.11
production:

B1.3 Load Weight Manual / Automatic Per load

B1.4 Blasting Media Size / type Manual Per load

1.4
Dwell time is clearly defined.
1.6
B1.5 If additional blasting is required, management approval Manual / Automatic Per load
2.11
is needed.
2.12

Blasting force is set and maintained within control limits


B1.6 Manual / Automatic Per load
(Amperage Draw).

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE B - Pretreatment (Mechanical)

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

1.4
1.6
B1.7 Abrasive media level Manual Once every 8 hours
2.11
2.12

1.4
B1.8 2.11 Dust collector efficiency/air flow Manual Once every 4 hours
2.12

1.4 Blasting media size / life:


B1.9 2.11 Media size is being checked on a regular schedule to Manual / Automatic Once per week
2.12 determine effective cleaning and life for product mix.

Surface cleanliness is checked after process. Surface


1.4
B1.10 cleanliness check must be conducted using a chemical Manual Once every 4 hours
2.11
("Copper Sulfate") or other qualitative method.

1.4
Surface profile is checked after process
B1.11 2.11 Manual Per load
(if applicable).
2.13

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE C - Conversion Coatings (Phosphate, Non-phosphate, Chromate, Non-chrome)

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

1.0 Conversion Coating

This audit requires the completion of either


C1.1 1.4 n/a n/a
Table A and/or B.

If the pretreatment and phosphate is not a continuous


process, there shall be a part cleanliness check Every start of production cycle and change
C1.2 Manual
immediately before phosphate. Acceptance criteria of lot number and each container.
must be defined.

Confirm set-up at the start of production


1.4
and every process change.
1.6
C1.3 Time Automatic Manually verify every 3 months or after
2.11
programming change or equipment
2.12
maintenance.

2.0 Conditioner (If Applicable)


1.4
C2.1 2.11 Pressure/Agitation Automatic Once every 8 hours
2.12
1.4 For continuous operations, once every 8
C2.2 2.11 Chemical Concentration Automatic/Manual hours. Otherwise, prior to start of each
2.12 production cycle.

C2.3 2.11 There is a dump schedule for conditioner. Manual Once per week

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE C - Conversion Coatings (Phosphate, Non-phosphate, Chromate, Non-chrome)

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

3.0 Conversion Coating Bath

1.4
C3.1 2.11 Pressure/Agitation Automatic Once every 8 hours
2.12

1.4 Temperature is monitored and controlled if required by


C3.2 2.11 chemical manufacturer's technical Automatic Once every 8 hours
2.12 data sheet.

Chemical Analysis:
- Phosphate: Free Acid, Total Acid, Iron Content, pH,
1.4
Accelerator Amount as Applicable
C3.3 2.11 Automatic/Manual Once every 4 hours
- Non-phosphate: Concentration, pH
2.12
- Chromate: Concentration, pH
- Non-chrome: Concentration, pH

1.4
Fluoride Ion Concentration (if aluminum is being
C3.4 2.11 Automatic/Manual Once every 4 hours
coated)
2.12
1.4
1.6
C3.5 Coating Weight/Thickness Manual Once every 8 hours*
2.11
2.12
1.4
C3.6 2.11 Crystal/Grain Size (If applicable) Manual Per customer requirement
2.12

Coverage of phosphate coating is visually inspected for


C3.7 Manual Once every 8 hours
absence of voids.

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE C - Conversion Coatings (Phosphate, Non-phosphate, Chromate, Non-chrome)

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

4.0 Rinse After Phosphate

Cleanliness of last rinse


1.4
- alkalinity/pH/conductivity
C4.1 2.11 Automatic/Manual Once every 8 hours
- visual inspection for suspended solids
2.12
- verify water flow (1/shift)

1.4
C4.2 2.11 Pressure/Agitation Automatic Once every 8 hours
2.12

C4.3 2.11 There is a dump schedule for rinses. Manual Once per week

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE C - Conversion Coatings (Phosphate, Non-phosphate, Chromate, Non-chrome)

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

5.0 Sealing Rinse (if applicable)


1.4
C5.1 2.11 Pressure/Agitation Automatic Once every 8 hours
2.12
1.4
C5.2 2.11 Chemical Concentration Automatic/Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12
1.4 Temperature is monitored and controlled if required by
C5.3 2.11 chemical manufacturer's technical Automatic Once every 8 hours
2.12 data sheet.

C5.4 2.11 There is a dump schedule for seal. Manual Once per week

6.0 Dry-Off (If Applicable)

1.4
C6.1 2.11 Air temperature is monitored and controlled. Automatic Once every 8 hours
2.12

1.4 There is a procedure to ensure dryness of parts prior to Every change of lot number and each
C6.2 Visual
2.11 subsequent coating. container.

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE D - Powder Coating

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

1.0 Powder Paint Application

1.4 Parts are checked exiting dry-off oven for cleanliness


D1.1 Manual Once every hour
2.11 and trapped water, prior to entering powder booth.

2.0 Powder Booth and Equipment

1.4
The temperature of parts entering the coating booth is
D2.1 2.11 Automatic/Manual Once every 8 hours
monitored.
2.12

Automatic Line: Confirm set-up at the start


of production and every process change.
1.4 Manually verify every 3 months or after
1.6 Conveyor speed set point is verified. If conveyor is not programming change or equipment
D2.2 Automatic/Manual
2.11 used, time in oven is verified. maintenance.
2.12
Manual Line: Continuously monitor time in
each stage of process.

1.4
The ground is checked using a 500 volt mega ohm At start-up, every process change and
D2.3 2.11 Manual
meter (less than 1megaohm resistance). once every 8 hours.
2.12

1.4
All guns are properly assembled (e.g., electrodes and Prior to the start of production and once
D2.4 2.11 Manual
deflectors are installed and not damaged). every 8 hours.
2.12

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE D - Powder Coating

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

1.4
The voltage and the current setting of the spray gun is At start-up, every process change and
D2.5 2.11 Manual
defined and verified for each process and part. once every 8 hours.
2.12

For automatic systems gun settings are defined and


verified for each process and part.
1.4 - Deflector
At start-up, every process change and
D2.6 2.11 - Gun to part distance Automatic
once every 8 hours.
2.12 - Number of guns
- Spacing of guns
- Reciprocator settings

1.4
The air dryer output temperature and dew point need to Prior to start of production and once every
1.17
D2.7 be measured. The filter on main compressed air line Automatic/Manual 4 hours. With a control alarm, frequency
2.11
needs to be monitored. may be reduced to once every 8 hours.
2.12

1.4
Prior to start of production and once every
1.17
D2.8 The booth temperature and humidity are checked. Automatic 4 hours. With a control alarm, frequency
2.11
may be reduced to once every 8 hours.
2.12

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE D - Powder Coating

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

1.4 Prior to start of production and once every


D2.9 2.11 The air balance in the powder booth is checked. Automatic/Manual 4 hours. With a control alarm, frequency
2.12 may be reduced to once every 8 hours.

1.4
1.17 Prior to the start of production and once
D2.10 Every sieve is clean and operational. Automatic/Manual
2.11 every 8 hours.
2.12

1.4
Prior to the start of production and once
D2.11 2.11 The powder flow on sieve is monitored. Automatic/Manual
every 8 hours.
2.12

1.4
Prior to the start of production and once
D2.12 2.11 The feed hopper fluidizing air pressure is checked. Manual
every 8 hours.
2.12

1.4
Prior to the start of production and once
D2.13 2.11 The dust vent on feed hopper is checked. Manual
every 8 hours.
2.12

1.4
1.17 Prior to the start of production and once
D2.14 The reclaim sieve is operating properly. Manual
2.11 every 8 hours.
2.12

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE D - Powder Coating

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

1.4
1.17 The venturis (orifice or block) in the feed pumps and Prior to the start of production and once
D2.15 Manual
2.11 the pick up tubes in the hopper are checked. every 8 hours.
2.12

1.4
The feed hoses are checked to ensure that they have Prior to the start of production and once
D2.16 2.11 Manual
no excessive bends and kinks. every 8 hours.
2.12

1.4 The virgin to reclaim powder ratio is defined for each


D2.17 2.11 part and/or process. Verified by feed pressures, weight Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12 or volume.

1.4
1.17 The pressure differential across the filters in the booth Prior to the start of production and once
D2.18 Automatic
2.11 collection chamber is monitored. every 8 hours.
2.12

1.4
Prior to the start of production and once
D2.19 2.11 Sealing Rinse (if applicable) Manual
every 8 hours.
2.12

3.0 Cure (See Cure Process Table I)

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE E - Spray

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

1.0 Part Appearance

Pretreated parts are visually inspected for


1.4 cleanliness and/or uniform phosphate coating or
E1.1 Manual Once every 4 hours
2.11 paint layer (when applicable). This must be
performed between each coating layer.

1.4 Mutilation prevention items (i.e., gloves, belt buckle


E1.2 Manual Ongoing
2.9 covers, watch covers, etc.) are in place.

1.4
Paint racks and/or fixtures are visually inspected for
1.17
E1.3 cleanliness, excessive paint build-up, bent hooks, Manual Each time parts are racked/loaded.
2.11
etc.
2.12

1.4
1.17 There is a paint rack/fixture maintenance program.
E1.4 Manual Per preventative maintenance schedule.
2.11 Program must define rack/fixture cleaning intervals.
2.12

1.4
Surface profile is within specifications
E1.5 2.11 Manual Once every 4 hours
(if applicable).
2.13

1.4
Surface tension is within specifications
E1.6 2.11 Manual Once every 4 hours
(if applicable).
2.13

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE E - Spray

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

2.0 Paint Mixing

1.4 Paint mixing rooms are controlled (mixing tank


E2.1 2.11 grounding, closed container, properly enclosed Automatic/Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12 space, temperature, clean environment).

1.4 There is a stock rotation system (FIFO) in place and


E2.2 2.11 being utilized to ensure that older material is used Manual Continuous
2.12 first.

1.4
1.6
Paint agitation/time and reduction (solvent package)
E2.3 1.17 Manual Once every 8 hours
are proper and documented.
2.11
2.12

1.4
Prior to start of production and every
1.6
Viscosity is verified to be within operational limits process change and/or addition. For
E2.4 1.17 Manual
and documented. continuous operations check once every 8
2.11
hours.
2.12

1.4
Prior to start of production and every
1.6
Temperature is verified to be within operational process change and/or addition. For
E2.5 1.17 Automatic/Manual
limits and documented. continuous operations check once every 8
2.11
hours.
2.12

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE E - Spray

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

1.4
1.6
Prior to start of production and every
E2.6 1.17 The proper filter size and type are in place. Manual
process change.
2.11
2.12

1.4
1.6 Pump pressures are set and pressure readings are
Prior to start of production, every process
E2.7 1.17 verified and documented to be within operational Manual
change and once every 8 hours.
2.11 limits.
2.12

1.4
Circulation (flow meter, pressure gage) is monitored Prior to start of production, every process
E2.8 2.11 Automatic/Manual
and documented. change and once every 8 hours.
2.12

Filters are in use (not by-passed) and pressures


1.4
monitored. Filters are changed before pressure Prior to start of production, every process
E2.9 2.11 Automatic/Manual
differential exceeds 10 PSI. change and once every 8 hours.
2.12
(70 kPa)

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE E - Spray

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

3.0 Primer/Promoter

1.4
1.17 Prior to start of production, every process
E3.1 Destaticizing air is operational. (Plastic parts only). Automatic
2.11 change and once every 8 hours.
2.12

1.4
Booth balance (air flow) is monitored and Prior to start of production, every process
E3.2 2.11 Manual
documented. change and once every 8 hours.
2.12

1.4
1.6
Booth temperature and humidity are monitored and Prior to start of production, every process
E3.3 1.17 Automatic/Manual
documented. change and once every 4 hours.
2.11
2.12

1.4
1.6 Atomizer parameters (fluid flow, air pressures Prior to start of production and every
E3.4 1.17 (atomizing fan, shaping), electrostatics and mixing) Automatic/Manual process change. For continuous
2.11 are set within operational limits. operations once per day.
2.12

For manual process, prior to start of


production and every process change.
1.4
E3.5 Time is verified and documented if applicable. Automatic/Manual
1.6 For automated process, verify once per
month, or after every program change or
major maintenance.

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE E - Spray

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

4.0 Basecoat (If applicable)

1.4
1.6 Flashtimes between coats are set at suppliers At the start of production and every
E4.1 Automatic/Manual
2.11 recommended times. process change.
2.13

1.4
1.6
Booth temperature and humidity are monitored and Prior to start of production, every process
E4.2 1.17 Automatic/Manual
documented. change and once every 4 hours.
2.11
2.12

1.4
1.6 Atomizer parameters (fluid flow, air pressures Prior to start of production and every
E4.3 1.17 (atomizing fan, shaping), electrostatics and mixing) Automatic/Manual process change. For continuous
2.11 are set within operational limits. operations once per day.
2.12

For manual process, prior to start of


production and every process change.
1.4
E4.4 Time is verified and documented if applicable. Automatic/Manual
1.6 For automated process, verify 1 per
month, or after every program change or
major maintenance.

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE E - Spray

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

Basecoat Heated Flash


5.0
(Waterborne Materials Only)

1.4 Oven set point(s) and energy type


Prior to start of production and every
1.6 (Convection/IR/UV/etc.), are verified to be within
E5.1 Manual process change. For continuous
2.11 chemical suppliers recommended limits and
operations once every 8 hours.
2.12 documented.

1.4 Prior to start of production and every two


1.6 hours. With a temperature control alarm,
E5.2 Oven temperature is monitored and recorded. Automatic
2.11 frequency may be reduced to once every 8
2.12 hours.

1.4
For each coating in use, proper cure or drying time
1.6 Every three months and after oven
E5.3 parameters are verified based upon product Manual
2.11 modification or repair.
technical data sheet.
2.12

E5.4 1.17 Air filter (if used) change is scheduled. Manual Per preventative maintenance schedule.

1.4
1.6 Percent solids after pre-dry is at the suppliers
E5.5 Manual Once every 8 hours
2.11 recommended percentage.
2.13

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE E - Spray

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

6.0 Clear coat

1.4
1.6 Flashtimes between coats are set at suppliers At the start of production and every
E6.1 Automatic/Manual
2.11 recommended times. process change.
2.13

1.4
1.6
Booth temperature and humidity are monitored and Prior to start of production, every process
E6.2 1.17 Automatic/Manual
documented. change and once every 4 hours.
2.11
2.12

1.4
1.6 Atomizer parameters (fluid flow, air pressures Prior to start of production and every
E6.3 1.17 (atomizing fan, shaping), electrostatics and mixing) Automatic/Manual process change. For continuous
2.11 are set within operational limits. operations once per day.
2.12

For manual process, prior to start of


production and every process change.
1.4
E6.4 Time is verified and documented if applicable. Automatic/Manual
1.6 For automated process, verify 1 per
month, or after every program change or
major maintenance.

7.0 Cure (See Cure Process Table I)

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE F - Electrocoat

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

1.0 Pre-Electrocoat Paint Application Part Appearance

1.4 Pretreated parts are visually inspected for cleanliness and/or


F1.1 Manual ```````````````` Once every 8 hours Once per Shift
2.11 uniform phosphate coating (when phosphate is used).

2.0 Electrocoat Tank

1.4
Bath parameters (pH, conductivity, solid content, temperature,
F2.1 2.11 Automatic/Manual Manual Once every 8 hours Once per Shift
voltage) are checked and adjusted.
2.12

1.4
Oil contamination (Panel inspection for pin holes). Once per month and if any visual defects
F2.2 2.11 Manual Automatic once a month
Oil bags must be available. are observed.
2.12

1.4 For manual process, prior to start of


1.6 production and every part change. For
F2.3 Cycle time/Line speed setup is checked. Automatic/Manual Automatic Once per Shift
2.11 automated process, at the start of
2.12 production and every process change.

1.4 Once every 4 hours. With a control alarm,


Is bath circulation monitored.
F2.4 2.11 Automatic/Manual Manual frequency may be reduced to once every 8 Once per Shift
(Flow meter, pressure gage)
2.12 hours.

Bag filters are in use (not by-passed) and pressures monitored.


1.4
Filter bags changed before pressure differential exceeds 10
F2.5 2.11 Manual Manual Once every 8 hours Once per Shift
PSI. (70 kPa)
2.12
Filter mesh size must be 25 µm maximum.

1.4
F2.6 2.11 Flow over the weir is verified. Manual Manual Once every 8 hours Once per Shift
2.12
1.4
F2.7 2.11 Bath is checked for microbial contamination. Manual Manual Once every month* Once per Shift
2.12

1.4
Incoming DI / RO water is checked for cleanliness. (Conductivity
F2.8 2.11 Automatic/Manual Automatic Once every 8 hours Once per Shift
<10 µS/µmhos )
2.12

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE F - Electrocoat

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

1.4
1.17 Paint racks and/or barrels are visually inspected for cleanliness,
F2.9 Manual Manual Each time parts are racked/loaded Ok
2.11 excessive paint build-up, bent hooks, etc.
2.12

1.4
1.17 There is a paint rack/barrel maintenance program. Program
F2.10 Manual Manual Per preventative maintenance schedule. Ok
2.11 must define rack/barrel cleaning intervals.
2.12

1.4
F2.11 2.11 Saddle contact cleanliness (if applicable). Manual Manual Once every 8 hours Once per Shift
2.12

1.4
1.17
F2.12 There is a tank cleaning and maintenance schedule. Manual Manual Once every year Ok
2.11
2.12

1.4
F2.13 2.11 Confirmation of ash content (pigment to binder ratio). Manual Manual Once per month Once every week
2.12

1.4
F2.14 2.11 Analysis of accumulation of metallic impurities. Manual Manual Once every 6 months Once every 6 months
2.12

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE F - Electrocoat

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

3.0 Sealing Rinse (if applicable)

1.4
F3.1 2.11 The conductivity of the anolyte solution has been measured. Manual Manual Once every 8 hours Once per Shift
2.12

1.4
F3.2 2.11 The pH of the anolyte solution has been measured. Manual Manual Once every 8 hours Once per Shift
2.12

1.4
Oil contamination (Panel inspection for pin holes).
F3.3 2.11 Manual Manual Once every month Once per month
Oil bags must be available.
2.12

1.4
F3.4 2.11 The anolyte solution is being circulated to each cell. Automatic/Manual Manual Once every 8 hours Once per Shift
2.12

1.4
F3.5 2.11 Dump and clean schedule for anolyte is being maintained. Manual Manual Per preventative maintenance schedule. Ok
2.12

1.4
F3.6 2.11 Amperage draw has been checked on anodes. Automatic/Manual Manual Per preventative maintenance schedule. Ok
2.12

4.0 Rectifier

1.4
1.6 The proper voltage is being used for the load size. When each bar or rack enters the coating
F4.1 Manual Automatic Automatic
2.11 (Electronically Controlled with digital read-out) tank.
2.12

1.4
Once every 6 months or after any change
F4.2 2.11 The ramp up time to full voltage has been verified. Automatic/Manual Automatic Ok
or maintenance of rectifier.
2.12

There is a visual indicator to alert personnel when system is


F4.3 2.10 Automatic Automatic Ongoing Ok
energized.

1.4
1.17 The ripple of the rectifier has been checked by an approved Once per year or after any change or
F4.4 Automatic/Manual Automatic Ok
2.11 electrician. maintenance of rectifier.
2.12

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE F - Electrocoat

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

5.0 Rinse System

1.4
Immersion rinse tanks are operating at the proper levels and
F5.1 2.11 Automatic/Manual Automatic Once every 8 hours Once per Shift
tanks are being agitated correctly.
2.12

1.4
F5.2 2.11 There is sufficient permeate supplied to the rinse. Automatic/Manual Manual Once every 8 hours Once per Shift
2.12

1.4
The pH and conductivity of the DI rinse water are measured. (If
F5.3 2.11 Manual Manual Once every 8 hours Once per Shift
part of production process).
2.12

1.4
Ultra filters are in use (not by-passed) and pressures monitored.
F5.4 2.11 Automatic/Manual Manual Once every 8 hours Once per Shift
2.12

Bag filters are in use (not by-passed) and pressures monitored.


1.4
Filter bags changed before pressure differential exceeds 10
F5.5 2.11 Manual Manual Once every 8 hours Once per Shift
PSI. (70 kPa)
2.12
Filter mesh size must be 25 µm maximum.

1.4
1.17 Rinse tanks and related equipment are emptied, inspected and
F5.6 Manual Manual Per preventative maintenance schedule. Ok
2.11 cleaned.
2.12
6.0 Cure (See Cure Process Table I)

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE G - Dip/Spin

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

1.0 Coating Material Application

Final pretreatment and/or phosphating shall be


G1.1 2.9 Yes/No Ongoing
completed in the same building.

1.4 After pretreatment, parts are inspected for flash rust,


G1.2 Manual Every lot
2.11 wetness, oil or other defects.

Pretreated parts are visually inspected for cleanliness


1.4
G1.3 and/or uniform phosphate coating (when phosphate is Automatic/Manual Once every 8 hours
2.11
used).

1.17 Containers used to hold parts between coating


G1.4 2.6 operations are free of oil, grease or other Yes/No Ongoing
2.9 contaminants.

Parts shall be stored indoors in a staging area that


does not affect the quality of parts. The staging area
G1.5 2.9 shall not be adjacent to open doorways or windows Yes/No Ongoing
exposing parts to water, dirt, and other
contaminations.

1.4 Parts shall be coated within the time limit specified by


G1.6 Per application manual Ongoing
2.11 the chemical supplier application manual.

1.4 Prior to loading into coating machines, parts are


G1.7 Manual Every lot
2.11 inspected for flash rust, wetness, oil or other defects.

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE G - Dip/Spin

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

2.0 Coating Bath


1.4
G2.1 2.11 Incoming paint viscosity is checked. Manual Each new lot of paint
2.12
1.4
G2.2 2.11 Incoming solids checks are performed. Manual Each new lot of paint
2.12
1.4
1.17 Appropriate mixing equipment is used, capable of
G2.3 Manual Ongoing
2.11 dispersing settled solids.
2.12

2.9 Coating material (paint) must be stored per chemical


G2.4 Manual Ongoing
2.10 supplier requirements.

When not in use, coating material (paint) is kept


2.9
G2.5 covered and/or sealed per chemical supplier Manual Ongoing
2.10
requirements.

2.9 Paint storage area is clean and organized so each


G2.6 Manual Ongoing
2.10 paint is easily found and to prevent contamination.

2.9 Preventive maintenance


G2.7 Paint filtration procedures are in place. Ongoing
2.10 schedule

The following checks shall be performed during


G2.8
production:

1.4
Prior to start of production and once every 3
G2.9 2.11 Paint Temperature Automatic/Manual
hours.
2.12

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE G - Dip/Spin

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

1.4
Prior to start of production and once every 3
G2.10 2.11 Viscosity Manual
hours.
2.12

1.4 Prior to start of production and every process


G2.11 2.11 Basecoat % Solids (by weight). Manual change and/or addition. For continuous
2.12 operations once per day.

1.4
Prior to start of production and once every 3
G2.12 2.11 Volume (paint depth in coating vat). Automatic/Manual
hours.
2.12

1.4 Equipment surfaces in contact with wet coating (ex.


G2.13 2.11 Vibratory feed tables) are free of loose debris and Manual Once per day
2.12 excess coating build-up.
1.4
1.17 Basket condition (basket mesh clean and
G2.14 Manual Once per day
2.11 undamaged).
2.12

1.4 Paint and/or viscosity reducing agent additions are


G2.15 2.11 documented and the viscosity verified before Manual Each addition
2.12 production continues.

G2.16 2.10 Viscosity cups are cleaned after each use. Manual Ongoing

2.14 Viscosity cups are verified against calibrated


G2.17 Manual Twice per month
1.17 standards or master cup.

2.14 Thermometers are verified against calibrated


G2.18 Manual Once per month
1.17 standards.

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE G - Dip/Spin

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

3.0 Application Parameters

A system is in place to ensure proper basket weights


1.4
G3.1 for specific parts, such as processing manual, traveler, Automatic/Manual Every lot
1.6
or process recipe.

1.4
G3.2 Baskets are kept less than 2/3 full by volume. Automatic/Manual Every lot
1.6

Coating parameters are controlled and verified via


1.4
G3.3 external display (dip time, spin speed, spin time, spin Automatic/Manual Every lot
1.6
cycle, spin direction and tumbling).

There is a system (raking, vibe table, etc.) to uniformly


1.4
distribute parts prior to curing to ensure proper cure
G3.4 1.6 Automatic/Manual Every lot
and prevent parts from sticking and minimize touch
1.17
marks.

G3.5 2.10 Vibratory feed tables are cleaned (if used). Manual As needed

There is evidence of steps taken to assist in soft


G3.6 2.9 handling of parts (shallow drops, lined chutes and Automatic/Manual Every lot
hoppers, bumper boards, etc.).

1.4
G3.7 2.9 Parts are cool to touch before each coating step. Manual Every lot
2.11

4.0 Cure (See Cure Process Table I)

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE H - Autodeposition

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

1.0 Coating Bath

1.4
Mixer speed and direction are monitored and
H1.1 2.11 Automatic/Manual Once every 8 hours
adjusted.
2.12

1.4
1.6 Temperature of the coating bath is continuously Continuous monitoring by controller and
H1.2 Automatic
2.11 monitored and controlled. manually verified once per day.
2.12

1.4
Misting nozzles in the vicinity of the coating bath
H1.3 2.11 Automatic/Manual Once every 8 hours
are operational.
2.12

1.4
Acid (e.g., 101 meter) and oxidation/reduction
H1.4 2.11 Automatic/Manual Once every 2 hours
potential (ORP) levels are checked.
2.12

1.4
Chemical concentration (% solids, starter/iron
H1.5 2.11 Automatic/Manual Once every 8 hours
titration, conductivity) is checked and maintained.
2.12
1.4
1.17 Coating tank, mixers and heating/cooling system
H1.6 Manual Once every 12 months
2.11 are inspected and maintained.
2.12

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE H - Autodeposition

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

2.0 Tap Rinse After Coating

1.4
H2.1 2.11 Pump pressure or agitator speed is monitored. Automatic/Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12

1.4
H2.2 2.11 Impurity concentration (conductivity) is checked. Automatic/Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12

3.0 Reaction Rinse

1.4
Chemical concentration is checked and
H3.1 2.11 Automatic/Manual Once every 8 hours
maintained.
2.12

1.4
H3.2 2.11 Pump pressure or agitator speed is monitored. Automatic/Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12

1.4 Temperature is monitored and controlled if


H3.3 2.11 required by chemical manufacturer's technical Automatic/Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12 data sheet.

1.4
1.17 Per Chemical Manufacturer's
H3.4 There is a dump schedule. Manual
2.11 recommendation and production volume.
2.12

4.0 Cure (See Cure Process Table I)

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE I - Cure

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

*If minimum requirements are not met, provide supporting records to justify actual conditions.

Item # Related
CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

1.0

Oven conditions are monitored and recorded continuously by a


data recorder. Prior to start of production and once every
I1.1 Convective - Temperature Automatic Automatic 2 hours. With a control alarm, frequency
Gas IR - Gas flow may be reduced to once every 8 hours.
Electric IR - Power (wattage)
once per shift

Oven and part temperature profile is verified. The verification


shall be performed under production load conditions and with Once every 3 months and after oven
I1.2 Manual Automatic
thermocouples located to cover all areas of the part curing modification or repair.
window. TTR once in a three
month .
1.4
For each coating in use, proper cure or drying time parameters
1.6 Once every 3 months and after oven
I1.3 are verified based upon oven temperature profile and product Manual Manual
2.11 modification or repair.
technical data sheet. Only after oven
2.12
modification or repair. .
1.4
For manual process, prior to start of
1.6
Conveyor speed set point is verified. If conveyor is not used, production and every part change. For
I1.4 1.17 Automatic/Manual Automatic
time in oven is verified. automated process, at the start of
2.11
production and every process change.
2.12
Automatic
Per oven manufacturer, filter supplier
I1.5 Air filter (if used) change is scheduled. Manual N/A
recommendation. N/A

Cure testing is performed per part specification on a production At oven start-up, every process change
I1.6 2.13 Manual Manual Impact test performed as
part. and once every 8 hours.
once in a shift.
Coating adhesion test is performed per part specification on a At oven start-up, every process change
I1.7 2.13 Manual Manual
production part. and once every 8 hours. once per shift
Appearance requirements checks (color, gloss etc.) are At oven start-up, every process change
I1.8 2.13 Manual Manual
performed per part specification. and once every 8 hours. once per shift

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE J: Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

* When historical results show capability, test frequency may be reduced.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

1.0 Cleaning (Alkaline or Acid)


1.4
Continuous monitoring by controller.
J1.1 2.11 Temperature Automatic
Manually verify daily.
2.12

1.4
J1.2 2.11 Cleaner Concentration Manual Once per day *
2.12

1.4
J1.3 2.11 Soil loading ( i.e., acid split, alkalinity ratio) Manual Once per day *
2.12

For manual process, prior to start of


1.4 production and every process change. *
J1.4 2.11 Time Automatic or Manual
2.12 For automated process, verify after every
program change or major maintenance.

1.4
J1.5 2.11 Agitation (Consistent Across tank) Automatic Once every 8 hours
2.12
1.4
J1.6 2.11 Solution Level Automatic or Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12

1.4
J1.7 2.11 Skimmer Weir Level/oil separator function Automatic or Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE J: Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

* When historical results show capability, test frequency may be reduced.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

1.4
J1.8 2.11 Oil on top of tank Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12
1.4
J1.9 2.11 Debris in bottom of tank Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12

1.4
J1.10 2.11 Metal Contamination (as applicable) Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12

2.0 Rinsing

1.4
J2.1 2.11 Solution Level Automatic or Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12

1.4
Contamination accumulation/build up on side
J2.2 2.11 Manual Visual Once per week *
of tanks
2.12
1.4
There is a process for control of biological
J2.3 2.11 Manual Once per week *
contamination
2.12
1.4
Pressure for spray rinse.
J2.4 2.11 Automatic/Manual Once every 8 hours
Agitation or flow for immersion tanks.
2.12

1.4
Continuous monitoring by controller.
J2.5 2.11 Temperature (if controlled) Automatic
Manually verify daily.
2.12

For manual process, prior to start of


1.4 production and every process change.
J2.6 2.11 Time Automatic or Manual
2.12 For automated process, verify after every
program change or major maintenance.

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE J: Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

* When historical results show capability, test frequency may be reduced.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

Cleanliness of last rinse


- alkalinity/pH/conductivity
1.4
- visual inspection for oil or suspended
J2.7 2.11 Manual Once per day
contaminants
2.12
- overflow
- debris in bottom of tank

J2.8 2.11 There is a dump schedule for rinses. Manual Per preventative maintenance schedule.

3.0 Deoxidizer / Desmutter

1.4
Continuous monitoring by controller.
J3.1 2.11 Temperature (if applicable) Automatic or Manual
Manually verify daily.
2.12
1.4
J3.2 2.11 Concentration Manual Once per day *
2.12
1.4
J3.3 2.11 Acidity Ratio (Total Acid/ Free Acid = Ratio) Manual Once per day *
2.12

For manual process, prior to start of


1.4 production and every process change. *
J3.4 2.11 Time Automatic or Manual
2.12 For automated process, verify after every
program change or major maintenance.

1.4
J3.5 2.11 Agitation (Consistent Across tank) Automatic Once every 8 hours
2.12
1.4
J3.6 2.11 Solution Level Automatic or Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12
1.4
J3.7 2.11 Debris in bottom of tank Manual Once per day
2.12

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE J: Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

* When historical results show capability, test frequency may be reduced.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

4.0 Chemical Etch / Strip (alkaline or acid)

1.4
Continuous monitoring by controller.
J4.1 2.11 Temperature (if applicable) Automatic or Manual
Manually verify daily.
2.12
1.4
J4.2 2.11 Concentration Manual Once per day *
2.12
1.4
Contamination:
J4.3 2.11 Manual Once per day *
For alkaline: aluminum content
2.12
1.4
Contamination accumulation/build up on side
J4.4 2.11 Manual Once per week
of tanks
2.12

1.4 For acid etches only:


J4.5 2.11 Ratio (Total Acid/ Free Acid = Ratio) Manual Once per day *
2.12 For acid: fluoride content

For manual process: every load.


1.4
J4.6 2.11 Time Automatic or Manual
For automated process, verify after every
2.12
process change or major maintenance.

1.4
J4.7 2.11 Agitation (Consistent Across tank) Automatic Once every 8 hours
2.12
1.4
J4.8 2.11 Solution Level Automatic or Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12
1.4
J4.9 2.11 Debris in bottom of tank Manual Once per day
2.12

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE J: Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

* When historical results show capability, test frequency may be reduced.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

5.0 Bright Dip

Continuous monitoring by controller with


1.4
low temperature alarm. Manually verify
J5.1 2.11 Temperature Automatic or Manual
prior to start of production and once every
2.12
4 hours.

1.4
J5.2 2.11 Acid concentration Manual Once every 4 hours
2.12
1.4
J5.3 2.11 Specific gravity Manual Once every 4 hours
2.12
1.4
J5.4 2.11 Contamination: aluminum content Manual Once per week
2.12
1.4
Contamination accumulation, suspended
J5.5 2.11 Manual Once per day
solids
2.12

For manual process: every load.


1.4
J5.6 2.11 Time Automatic or Manual
For automated process, verify after every
2.12
process change or major maintenance.

1.4
J5.7 2.11 Agitation (Consistent Across tank) Automatic Once every 8 hours
2.12
1.4
J5.8 2.11 Solution Level Automatic or Manual Once every 4 hours
2.12

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE J: Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

* When historical results show capability, test frequency may be reduced.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

6.0 Bright Dip Rinse

1.4
J6.1 2.11 Acid concentration or specific gravity Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12

1.4
J6.2 2.11 Time Automatic or Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12
1.4
J6.3 2.11 Agitation (Consistent Across Tank) Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12

1.4
J6.4 2.11 Solution Level Automatic or Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12

1.4
J6.5 2.11 Debris in bottom of tank Manual Once per week
2.12

1.4
J6.6 2.11 Temperature Automatic or Manual Once per day
2.12

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE J: Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

* When historical results show capability, test frequency may be reduced.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

7.0 Anodizing

1.4
Continuous monitoring by controller.
J7.1 2.11 Temperature Automatic
Manually verify daily.
2.12

1.4
J7.2 2.11 Acid Concentration Manual Once every 8 hours *
2.12

1.4 Concentration of additives (fume


J7.3 2.11 suppressant, hard coat additives, high Manual Once per week
2.12 temperature additives)

1.4
J7.4 2.11 Aluminum Content (maximum 20 g/L) Manual Once per week
2.12

For manual process: every load.


1.4
J7.5 2.11 Time Automatic or Manual
For automated process, verify after every
2.12
process change or major maintenance.

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE J: Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

* When historical results show capability, test frequency may be reduced.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

1.4
J7.6 2.11 Agitation (Consistent Across tank) Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12

1.4
J7.7 2.11 Solution Level Automatic or Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12

1.4
J7.8 2.11 Debris in bottom of tank Manual Once per week
2.12

For manual process: every load.


1.4
Voltage or Amperage with Gradual Ramp Up
J7.9 2.11 Automatic or Manual
(Current Increase) For automated process, verify after every
2.12
process change and major maintenance.

1.4
J7.10 2.11 Saddle Contact Cleanliness Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE J: Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

* When historical results show capability, test frequency may be reduced.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

8.0 Dye

1.4
Continuous monitoring by controller.
J8.1 2.11 Temperature Automatic
Manually verify daily.
2.12

1.4
J8.2 2.11 Concentration Manual Once per day *
2.12

1.4
J8.3 2.11 pH Manual Once every 8 hours *
2.12

For manual process: every load.


1.4
J8.4 2.11 Time Automatic or Manual
For automated process, verify after every
2.12
process change or major maintenance.

1.4
J8.5 2.11 Agitation (as applicable) Automatic Once every 8 hours
2.12

1.4
J8.6 2.11 Solution Level Automatic or Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12

1.4
J8.7 2.11 Debris in bottom of tank Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12

1.4
There is a process for control of biological
J8.8 2.11 Manual Once per week *
contamination.
2.12

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE J: Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

* When historical results show capability, test frequency may be reduced.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

9.0 Pre-Seal (If applicable)

1.4
Continuous monitoring by controller.
J9.1 2.11 Temperature (if applicable) Automatic or Manual
Manually verify daily.
2.12

1.4
J9.2 2.11 Concentration Manual Once per week *
2.12

1.4
J9.3 2.11 pH Manual Once every 4 hours *
2.12

For manual process: every load.


1.4
J9.4 2.11 Time Automatic or Manual
For automated process, verify after every
2.12
process change or major maintenance.

1.4
J9.5 2.11 Agitation (as applicable) Automatic Once every 8 hours
2.12

1.4
J9.6 2.11 Solution Level Automatic or Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12

1.4
J9.7 2.11 Debris in bottom of tank Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE J: Anodizing and Hard Coat Anodizing

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

* When historical results show capability, test frequency may be reduced.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Type of Control Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

10.0 Seal (if Applicable)

For manual process: every load.


1.4
J10.1 2.11 Time Automatic or Manual
For automated process, verify after every
2.12
process change or major maintenance.

1.4
Continuous monitoring by controller.
J10.2 2.11 Temperature Automatic or Manual
Manually verify every 4 hours if controlled.
2.12

1.4
J10.3 2.11 Concentration Manual Once every 8 hours *
2.12

1.4
J10.4 2.11 pH Manual Once every 4 hours *
2.12
1.4
Contamination (per chemical vendor
J10.5 2.11 Manual Once per week *
recommendation)
2.12
1.4
J10.6 2.11 Agitation (as applicable) Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12

1.4
J10.7 2.11 Solution Level Automatic or Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12

1.4
J10.8 2.11 Debris in bottom of tank Manual Once every 8 hours
2.12

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE K - EQUIPMENT

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to customer requirements.

* When historical results show capability, test frequency may be reduced.

Related Pretreatment/ Calibration /


Powder Included in Preventative
Item # CSA Equipment Type Aqueous E-Coat Spray Dip/Spin A-Coat Cure Anodize Verification Frequency Certification Comment
Coat Maintenance Plan
Question # Cleaning Frequency *

PROCESS EQUIPMENT
K1.1 2.14 pH / Conductivity Meter X X X X X X Daily Once per year Once per year

pH / Conductivity Probe
K1.2 2.14 Solution compatible probes must X Before each use N/A Once per year
be used.

K1.3 2.14 Temperature Controller X X X X X X X X Every 3 months N/A Once per year
Ripple Checked every 12
K1.4 2.14 Rectifier X X N/A Once per year
months

K1.5 2.14 Amp Meter/Volt Meter X X X X X X Checked every 12 months N/A Once per year

Wet Analysis:
Before use, chemicals must be
K1.6 2.14 X X X X X X Daily N/A Once per year
checked for shelf life and/or
expiration date

K1.7 2.14 Filters X X X X X X X Per process table N/A Once per year
Laboratory Balance (Weight once in year
K1.8 2.14 X X X X Once per month N/A
Scale)
K1.9 2.14 Conductivity Meter X X X X X X Once per month N/A once in year

K1.10 2.14 Viscosity cup X X Twice per month N/A


once in year
K1.11 Thermocouple X X X X X X X N/A Once every 6 months

K1.12 2.14 Lab Oven Controller X X X X X X N/A Once per year once in year

MINIMUM REQUIRED TESTING CAPABILITY


K2.1 2.14 Salt Spray Cabinet X X X X X X X X Daily per ASTM B117 N/A not available

K2.2 2.14 Water Immersion bath X X X X X Daily N/A not available

K2.3 2.14 Cure Testing X X X X X X Per Part N/A once in shift

K2.4 2.14 Adhesion Testing X X X X X X Per Part N/A per lot

K2.5 2.14 Thickness Testing X X X X X X Per Part Once per year per lot

K2.6 2.14 Solids Testing X X X X X Daily N/A once in shift

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE L - Part Inspection and Testing

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to specifications or other
requirements.

Note that not all tests are applicable to all coatings.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

1.0

Procedures are in place to prevent damage to the finish or part


L1.1 1.4 System in place
during the inspection and packaging processes.
yes

Appearance of the coating shall be verified per specification and


L1.2 Ongoing
applications manual.
as per PDI report

Initial adhesion At the start of production and once every


L1.3
(Tape, bend, impact) 8 hours.
once in shift

L1.4 Intercoat / final adhesion Per customer specification once in shift

At the start of production and once every


L1.5 Color and Gloss (If applicable)
8 hours.
once in shift

At the start of production, every part family


L1.6 Film thickness / coating weight change and every process change. Once
every 8 hours.
once in shift

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)


CQI-12
Special Process: Coating System Assessment
Version 2 Issued 2/2012

PROCESS TABLE L - Part Inspection and Testing

All requirements given below are subordinate to customer specific requirements.

The customer may have additional requirements, e.g., inspection testing, greater frequencies, etc. When performing the job audit, the auditor shall verify coater is conforming to specifications or other
requirements.

Note that not all tests are applicable to all coatings.

Related
Item # CSA Category/Process Steps Monitoring Frequency Observation/Comments
Question #

Minimum Requirement Actual Condition (Pass / Fail / N/A)

Once per week per line per coating


Corrosion resistance: process being used.
- Neutral salt spray If the same coating system is used for
L1.7
- Humidity multiple customers with different
- Water immersion requirements, test to the highest
requirement. once in year a per customer
rquirement

Once per week per line per coating


L1.8 Torque tension/Coefficient of Friction
process being used.
not applicable

L1.9 Dimensional check (e.g., Go-no go, Plug and Ring gage) Per customer specification
not applicable

L1.10 Hydrogen Embrittlement Per customer specification


not applicable

L1.11 Cyclical Corrosion Testing Per customer specification Per customer specification

© 2012 AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group)

You might also like