Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OC ReadingComprehension PracticePaper2
OC ReadingComprehension PracticePaper2
OC ReadingComprehension PracticePaper2
Review A
What on earth is the point of remaking Walt Disney’s great and possibly greatest
masterpiece, the glorious animated musical from 1967, based on Kipling’s tales, all about the
“man cub” Mowgli, brought up by wolves in the Indian jungle – famously the last film to get
Disney’s personal touch? A remake which furthermore leaves old-fashioned animation
behind, departing for the live-action uncanny valley of hyperreal CGI, which heretically loses
most of the songs?
Well, no point really … other than simply to create a terrifically enjoyable piece of old-
fashioned storytelling and a beautiful-looking film: spectacular, exciting, funny and fun. It
handsomely revives the spirit of Disney’s original film, while also having something of old-
school family movies about animals like The Incredible Journey (1963) – it almost feels like
something I could have watched as a kid on TV.
Perhaps most strikingly of all, it re-imports into the story elements of the Disney classic The
Lion King (1994) which The Jungle Book influenced in the first place: there’s a special rock
for the animals to gather round, a stampede scene and an evil feline with a facial
disfigurement.
Newcomer Neel Sethi plays Mowgli himself; Ben Kingsley voices Bagheera the panther;
Idris Elba is the evil tiger Shere Khan; Scarlett Johansson is the hissing snake mesmerist Kaa;
Christopher Walken is the voice of King Louie the fire-hungry ape and inevitably – but
pleasingly, and very amusingly – Bill Murray is an outstanding vocal turn as the notorious
ursine slacker and pleasure-seeker Baloo the bear who teaches Mowgli the importance of
kicking back and enjoying the bare necessities of life.
I’ve never seen digital rendering of talking animals look so persuasive and this film also
creates witty and ingenious twists on the story we all know, including a new plot
development concerning wolf-leader Akela (Giancarlo Esposito) and Shere Khan – and even
creates a backstory for Mowgli which explains how he got that modesty-preserving loincloth
of his.
It’s not a musical and yet the deployment of two famous songs – The Bare Necessities and I
Wanna Be Like You – feels cohesive and easy. In addition, the film emphatically revives
Kipling’s poem The Law of the Jungle with its collective all-for-one ethic: “The strength of
the pack is the wolf/And the strength of the wolf is the pack.”
But what a tremendous success this is. The Jungle Book 2.0 is the unexpected treat of the
week.
Review B
The new rendition of Walt Disney's classic, "The Jungle Book," is a stark reminder of the
axiom, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." The film, riddled with grandeur and flashy CGI, seems
to have lost the essence of the original masterpiece from 1967.
Despite its vibrant visuals, the modern CGI dilutes the charm and genuine storytelling appeal
of the original. These modern effects are undoubtedly technically superb, but I am left with
the impression of a lacklustre retelling of the original narrative; why didn’t the directors offer
a fresh perspective? The infusion of elements from "The Lion King," like a special rock and a
disfigured evil feline, feels contrived and unnecessary, serving more as an unoriginal
amalgamation of Disney classics than a unique take on Kipling's tales.
The voice acting, while bolstered by star-studded names like Ben Kingsley and Idris Elba,
feels lacklustre at best. Bill Murray as Baloo the bear and Christopher Walken as King Louie
feel predictably cast and their performances, although satisfactory, lack the charm and
originality that would make them stand out.
While the film attempts to add depth to the story with the addition of a backstory for Mowgli
and a new subplot for wolf-leader Akela, these additions seem forced and incohesive. The
backstory, instead of adding depth to Mowgli's character, comes across as a hasty attempt to
justify his attire.
The movie's departure from the original's poignant message of maturity and growth in favour
of a naive depiction of harmonious human-animal coexistence dilutes the maturity of the
story’s themes. Ultimately, this Hollywood reboot of "The Jungle Book" is an unfortunate
example of a remake that fails to capture the essence of the original, proving that not all
classics need to be remade.
2. According to Review B, the film’s departure from the original’s message towards
harmonious human-animal coexistence is seen as
A. an unexpectedly mature re-interpretation.
B. an offence to the original author.
C. a weakening factor of the narrative depth.
D. an immature interpretation of the story’s setting.
3. How does the author of Review B perceive the use of CGI in the movie?
A. An impressive innovation that suits modern audiences.
B. An effective technique that enhances the visual appeal of the movie.
C. A grand spectacle but ultimately unsettling.
D. Bright and colourful but lacking originality and depth.
4. In Review B, the word ‘contrived’ implies that the inclusion of “The Lion King”
elements was
A. a deliberate but unoriginal choice that lacks authenticity.
B. forcefully added and rather uninspiring.
C. skilfully designed but ultimately unnecessary.
D. a futile attempt at engaging a younger, modern audience.
6. Comparing both reviews, what differing opinions do the reviewers have about the
film's animation?
A. Review A lauds the CGI, while Review B misses the old-fashioned animation.
B. Review A appreciates the modern CGI, while Review B finds it hasty and distracting.
C. Both reviews are in favour of the vibrant CGI used in the film.
D. Both reviews lament the departure from the old-fashioned animation.
Read the poem by Judith Wright and then answer the questions.
Drought Year
That time of drought the embered air
burned to the roots of timber and grass.
The crackling lime-scrub would not bear
and Mooni Creek was sand that year.
The dingo's cry was strange to hear.
10. Which verb best contributes to the symbolism created by the words ‘skull’, ‘blood-
drop’ and ‘bone’?
A. ‘perching’
B. ‘curled’
C. ‘wither’
D. ‘whisper’
11. What does the repeated phrase ‘I heard the dingoes cry’ imply?
A. The speaker’s sense of desperation and fear.
B. The pervading silence of the landscape during the drought.
C. The persistence of life despite the harsh conditions.
D. The haunting and ominous nature of the drought.
The following text contains 6 paragraphs (questions 12-17). For each paragraph, choose the
correct main idea summary from the options below (labelled A-G). There will be one
summary left over that you do not need to use.
includes family members who both show an interest in trying something 22.
new?
suggests that we can choose our own family? 23.
Text A
‘I’m never coming back!' Harry yelled. 'I'm running away and that's that!'
Stars were sprinkled across a darkening sky and Harry could hear the distant whisper of surf. His
parents were seated on the deck of his Uncle Dave's house, drinking coffee from tiny cups. All he
wanted to do was trying something new! But they just laughed, even Uncle Dave.
‘Do you want to borrow the car?' called his mother, jangling her keys. 'You won't get far walking.'
'Hope you've packed your toothbrush and pyjamas!' added his dad.
They were making fun of him! They really didn't believe that he was going this time. But he was, for
sure! They'd been at Uncle Dave's all day and he hadn't had a swim yet! Now he wasn't allowed
because it was too late or too dark or too cold, or he wasn't a strong enough swimmer or they'd be
going home soon and besides 'it'd be no fun on your own'…
Text B
On the way home, the twins fenced with rolled-up newspapers. Attack, deflect, counterattack. Their
movements were formal yet fluid like the fencers they'd watched, much to the amusement of passers-
by. At home they continued with whatever came to hand: rulers, umbrellas, chopsticks. Alice and
Zack were hooked.
After two weeks, Mum had had enough. She'd come home to find the twins fencing, one with a long
French baguette and the other with a spicy cabanossi sausage from the fridge. It hadn't ended well,
though everyone agreed that Racer, the dog, had easily won. He sensibly ran into the garden with the
remains of the cabanossi as the twins surveyed the carnage in the kitchen.
'Right!' said Mum, in that low, calm voice that could really catch you off guard. She held up a hand to
silence Alice and Zack and reached for her phone. The twins stood shame-faced.
‘Oakdale Fencing Club? Yes, I was wondering if you run classes for children?'
'Yes!' mouthed Alice and Zack, punching the air.
Text C
Because a wolf pack is really a family unit, raising a litter isn't just a job for the mother and father of
the pups. All the wolves in a pack help to take care of the newest offspring. This includes feeding
them, watching over them, and of course playing with them as they grow up.
Wolves have a strong emotional connection to their pack mates, and it has been shown that when a
member of a pack dies, the other wolves mourn. Here is a quote from a research paper: "The pack lost
their spirit and their playfulness. They no longer howled as a group, but rather they 'sang alone in a
slow mournful cry.' They were depressed — tails and heads held low and walking softly and slowly
— when they came upon the place where Motaki was killed. They inspected the area and pinned their
ears back and dropped their tails, a gesture that usually means submission. It took about six weeks for
the pack to return to normal."
Text D
The traditional family consists of a father, mother and children. This is the nuclear family often shown
on television as the familial standard. However, the 21st Century showcases various family units,
some very different from the standard unit of prior decades. Today, children are often raised in single-
parent homes or by grandparents. Then there are adopted families, foster families and blended
families. Some families opt to have no children. The idea that parents and children make a family is
an old-fashioned definition; however, to accurately acknowledge other family structures, a broader
definition is necessary. In addition to a universal family definition, plenty of people consider a group
of friends to be family, and many consider pets as defining members of the family unit. Who
comprises a family is up to the people in the family themselves. People may opt to keep blood
relatives in their lives, or let them go if they are harmful to their well-being. Many folks add caring
and supportive people to their extended clan when they choose, deciding who belongs in their specific
concept of family.
Answer key:
1 B
2 C
3 D
4 A
5 D
6 A
7 B
8 B
9 A
10 C
11 D
12 G
13 E
14 D
15 B
16 C
17 A
18 C
19 D
20 C
21 A
22 B
23 D
24 A
25 B