Q. Take a decision regarding the future of your sales team. Possible alternatives: Promote Give Notice Terminate Status Quo Change the territory Send for training Recruit more salespeople
The recommendations are as follows:
1. Walter Avery: We recommend changing the territory from ME to City of Boston (previously Hammond’s territory). This is because his current region has a larger land area (35,385 units) with lower population density (599,000), and the previous manager notes that he has been uninterested in less populated Northern Regions. This will also help him reduce travel time and have a better work-life balance. 2. Lucia Concetta: We recommend putting her on probation. It has been noted that she focuses more on the larger clients and neglects the smaller ones. The case mentions that “the salespeople could not rely on just one or two large accounts to drive revenue; they have to establish numerous relationships with health clubs of all sizes and varieties at the local level, in order to succeed.” She has also been able to only capture 43% of the Buying Power Index (BPI) in her territory. Further, since she also has a perfect score in training, we believe that probation is the only way to lead her to the right path. We are also adding another sales person in the territory to help capture a larger BPI. 3. Daniel Ellis: We recommend that status quo is maintained for him. He has captured 85% of the BPI in his territory. He also has a great track record, and has good relations with clients in his current territory. Further, he does not want to take up any managerial positions, hence he should not be promoted. 4. Grant Foster: We recommend that status quo is maintained for him. He is an above- average performer and has captured 79% of his territory’s BPI even while dealing with personal problems. Further, taking any negative action against him in such a time might lead to a negative ripple effect among the entire team. We are also adding one salesperson in his territory to provide the required support. 5. Matt Gibbons: We recommend shifting the territory from Eastern MA & RI to CT (Barrow’s territory). This will resolve his ethical conflict of personal interest in local businesses and his restaurant, and might also minimize the long, expensive lunches with clients. We are also shifting him to the neighboring territory only, so that his major motivation of having job flexibility remains unchanged. Further, he has been able to capture 114% of his territory’s BPI, and hence we believe that shifting him to a territory with more potential (BPI of 1.8, of which only 52% has been captured) will significantly improve the overall revenues. 6. Sophia Barrow: We recommend putting her on probation and providing her training. She has been in the same territory for 5 years and yet has only been able to capture 52% of the territory’s BPI. Further, she has been resisting training, which means she needs it, and a fear of termination might push her to take the training seriously. Further, she might also learn on-the-job while working alongside Gibbons. 7. Sam Hammond: We recommend promoting him. He has had an above-average performance, and has captured his market well (102.5% of BPI). Further, there have been no complaints from either the current or the former manager. However, it can be inferred from the case that his motivation has taken a hit, probably because he was not chosen as District Sales Director. So the promotion might act as a good motivating factor.
New Territory allocations
Territory Old Salesperson New Salesperson New Hires (If Any)
MA Ellis Ellis - CT Barrow Barrow, Gibbons - Boston Hammond Avery - NH Foster Foster and new hire (1) 1 MA/RI Gibbons New Hire (1) 1 MA/VT Concetta Concetta and New hire (1) 1 ME Avery New hires (2) 2 5 Note: Hammond has been promoted, hence no territory has been assigned to him.