Supreme Court Agrees To Hear Delhi Govt's Plea For Interim Stay of L-G's Firing' of 437 Independent Consultants - The Hindu

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

HOME / NEWS / CITIES / DELHI

Supreme Court agrees to hear


Delhi govt’s plea for interim stay
of L-G’s ‘firing’ of 437
independent consultants
The court also issues notice to Centre in Delhi Ordinance, impleads L-G as a
party

July 10, 2023 05:01 pm | Updated 10:17 pm IST - New Delhi


THE HINDU BUREAU
COMMENTS SHARE READ LATER

Delhi Lt. Governor Vinai Kumar Saxena and Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. | Photo Credit: ANI
The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear on July 17 an interim plea made by the
Delhi government seeking a stay of the Lieutenant-Governor’s executive order “firing”
437 independent consultants of the Delhi Legislative Assembly.
Appearing before a Bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud, senior
advocate A.M. Singhvi and advocate Shadaan Farasat said the L-G’s order was passed
pursuant to the promulgation of a central ordinance which gave the L-G control over
‘civil services’ in the national capital.
Also Read | The legality of the Delhi Ordinance
The interim application seeking relief for the 437 consultants was filed by the AAP
government as part of its larger petition challenging the legality of the National Capital
Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Ordinance, 2023.

“Their salaries have been stopped. They have stopped working… I am their employer, so I
have come for interim stay of the executive order which is based on the ordinance,” Mr.
Singhvi argued.
The Centre, represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, countered that many of the
consultants were party workers. “One of them is the wife of a sitting MLA,” Mr. Mehta
alleged.
Senior advocate Sanjay Jain, for the L-G, said an Article 32 petition under the
Constitution cannot be “converted” to challenge the firing of “independent consultants”.
Explained | How will the new Ordinance affect ‘services’ in Delhi?
A Bench of Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud and Justice P.S. Narasimha issued
notice to the Centre and impleaded the Delhi L-G V.K. Saxena as a respondent in the
petition against the Ordinance, which allows the L-G to appoint the officials in the
national capital. The court directed the respondents to file their replies in two weeks.
Appearing for the AAP government, senior advocate A.M. Singhvi and Shadaan Farasat,
said the National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Ordinance, 2023, effectively
gave a carte blanche to the bureaucrats in Delhi to disobey their Ministers.
The Arvind Kejriwal-led Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government has argued that the
Ordinance was promulgated within just eight days of the Supreme Court’s May 11
verdict in favour of the authority of Delhi government to make laws and administer
civil services in the national capital.
The May 11 judgment of a Constitution Bench led by CJI Chandrachud had limited the
role of the Lieutenant Governor (L-G), an arm of the Centre, over bureaucrats in the
capital to three specific areas — public order, police and land.
“The Ordinance has now wrested control over civil servants serving in Delhi from the
Government of NCT of Delhi to the unelected Lieutenant Governor… It has done so
without seeking to amend the Constitution, in particular Article 239AA, which holds
that the power and control over services should be vested in the elected government,”
the Delhi government, represented by advocate Shadan Farasat, has submitted.

The Government of NCT-Delhi (Amendment) Ordinance,


pitches a new body (NCCSA) for matters relating to Group
civil services officers. How will it function?

NCCSA votes on
National Capital Civil transfers, postings
prosecution sancti
Service Authority
disciplinary
proceedings, vigila
issues etc.

Chief Principal
Chief
Minister Home
Secretary
Secretary IAS bureaucrats fro
Centre
Centre

Lieutenant
Chief Minister can
Governor
vetoed.
The L-G can return the
NCCSA's recommendation L-G's decision is fi

Mr. Singhvi said the structure of the National Capital Civil Service Authority (NCCSA)
envisaged the Chief Minister a “minority voice” in the governance of Delhi. The Chief
Minister, though the chairperson of the NCCSA, was outnumbered by the Chief
Secretary and Principal Home Secretary, who function as Member and Member
Secretary, respectively.
The NCCSA exercises authority over civil service officers working in all Delhi
government departments except those in public order, police and land. NCCSA would
decide transfers, postings, prosecution sanctions, disciplinary proceedings, vigilance
issues, etc, of civil service officers deputed to Delhi government departments by
majority of votes of the members present and voting. The Lieutenant-Governor’s
decision, in case of a difference of opinion, would be final.
The Ordinance was promulgated within days of a Constitution Bench judgment on May
11, which had upheld the Delhi government’s control over the civil servants.
The government said the Ordinance subverted the judgment without explaining why
the court’s decision to give the authority over services to the elected government was
wrong in law.
The government said that by giving the L-G a final say, the dual scheme of governance
envisioned in Article 239AA has suffered a collapse. Under the Article, the L-G enjoys a
discretion only in matters following outside the Delhi government’s legislative and
executive domain. In all other issues, the L-G is bound by the aid and advice of the
Council of Ministers. The May 11 judgment had said the dual arrangement was
essential to preserve Delhi’s federal system of governance.

COMMENTS SHARE

Related Topics
Delhi / New Delhi / Aam Aadmi Party / judiciary (system of justice)

You might also like