“While approving and endorsing the action taken by the Council and the Working Committee of

the All-India Muslim League, as indicated in their resolutions dated the 27th of August, 17th and 18th of
September and 22nd of October, 1939, and 3rd of February 1940, on the constitutional issue, this session
of the All-India Muslim League emphatically reiterates that the scheme of Federation embodied in the
Government of India Act, 1935 is totally unsuited to, and unworkable in the peculiar conditions of this
country and is altogether unacceptable to Muslim India.
It further records its emphatic view that while the declaration dated the 18th of October, 1939,
made by the Viceroy on behalf of His Majesty’s Government is reassuring in so far as it declares that the
policy and plan on which the Government of India Act, 1935 is based will be reconsidered in consultation
with the various parties, interests and communities in India, Muslim India will not be satisfied unless the
whole constitutional plan is reconsidered de novo and that no revised plan would be acceptable to the
Muslims unless it is framed with their approval and consent.
Resolved that it is the considered view of this session of the All -India Muslim League that no
constitutional plan would be workable in this country or acceptable to Muslims unless it is designed on
the following basic principle, namely, that geographically contiguous units are demarcated into regions
which should be so constituted, with such territorial readjustments as may be necessary, that the areas in
which the Muslims are numerically in a majority, as in the North -Western and Eastern Zones of India,
should be grouped to constitute ‘Independent States’ in which the constituent units shall be autonomous
and sovereign.
That adequate, effective and mandatory safeguards should be specifically provided in the
constitution for minorities in these units and in these regions for the protection of their religious, cultural,
economic, political, administrative and other rights and interests in consultation with them; and in other
parts of India where Mussalmans are in a minority, adequate, effective and mandatory safeguard shall be
specially provided in the constitution for them and other minorities for the protection of their religious,
cultural, economic, political, administrative and other rights and interests in consultation with them.
This session further authorizes the Working Committee to frame a scheme of constitution in
accordance with these basic principles, providing for the assumption finally by the respective regions of
all powers such as defence, external affairs, communications, customs and such other matters as may be
necessary”.
Besides many others, the Resolution was seconded by Chaudhary Khaliquzzam from UP, Maulana
Zafar Ali Khan from Punjab, Sardar Aurangzeb from the N. W. F. P, Sir Abdullah Haroon from Sindh,
and Qazi Muhammad Esa from Baluchistan. Those who seconded the resolution, in their speeches declared
the occasion as a historic one. The Resolution was eventually passed on the last day of the moot, i.e.
March 24”.

Dr. M. Moiz Khan
Assistant Professor
Dept. of History, University of Karachi
0322-2391591, moiz200@yahoo.com
Cripps Mission Plan 1942:
Since the start of the Second World War in 1939 British wanted the complete
support of Indians in the war. First offer was made in 1939 but it was refused by Indians
and Congress also resigned from their ministries. The events which occurred in the early
1940’s changed the situation and British thought that now Indians would reconsider their
position and may support the war.
In 1941 Japan attacked USA at Pearl Harbour and entered the Great War. It joined
the German Camp and declared war against England and her allies. England looked at it
as an opportunity to pursue India to support the war. Japan started to invade countries
towards east. India was in approach of Japan. If Japan wanted to attack England directly

54
it was very difficult because geographically E ngland was very far from Japan. So the best
way to harm England was to attack India because it was the economic engine of England.
In 1942 British sent Stafford Cripps to India with a set of proposals for India. In
return they wanted Indian support in the war. The draft declaration which Cripps brought
with him to India was published on 30 th March 1942. These proposals are as under:

1. India would be made a dominion of United Kingdom.

2. Immediately after the war a new body for making a constitution would be framed
through provincial legislatures. Any constitution made by this body would be acceptable to
British.
3. India would be made a union and any province would be free to join this union or not.
Dr. M. Moiz Khan
“Draft Declaration for Discussion with Indian Leaders, Assistant Professor
Dept. of History, University of Karachi
Wished March 30, 1942 0322-2391591, moiz200@yahoo.com
The conclusions of the British War Cabinet a s set out below are those which Sir
Stafford Cripps has taken with him for discussion with the Indian Leaders and the
question as to whether they will be implemented will depend upon the outcome of these
discussions which are now taking place.
His Majesty's Government, having considered the anxieties expressed in this
country and in India as to the fulfilment of the promises made in regard to th e future of
India, have decided to lay down in precise and clear terms the steps which they propose
shall be taken for the earliest possible realisation of self -government in India. The object
is the creation of a new Indian Union which shall constitute a Dominion, associated with
the United Kingdom and the other Dominions by a common allegiance to the Crown, but
equal to them in every respect, in no way subordinate in any aspect of its domestic or
external affairs. Dr. M. Moiz Khan
Assistant Professor
Dept. of History, University of Karachi
0322-2391591, moiz200@yahoo.com
His Majesty's Government therefore make the following declaration:

(a) Immediately upon the cessation of hostilities, steps shall be taken to set up in India,
in the manner described hereafter, an elected body charged with the task of framing a new
Constitution for India.

(b) Provision shall be made, as set out below, for the participation of the Indian States in
the constitution-making body.

(c) His Majesty's Government undertakes to accept and implement forthwith the
Constitution so framed subject only to:
(i) the right of any Province of British India that is* not prepared to accept the
new Constitution to retain its present constitutional position, provision being made for
its subsequent accession if it so decides.
With such non-acceding Provinces, should they so desire, His Majesty's Government will
55
be prepared to agree upon a new Constitution, giving them the same full status as Indian
Union, and arrived at by a procedure analogous to that here laid down.
(ii) the signing of a Treaty which shall be negotiated between His Majesty's
Government and the constitution-making body. This Treaty will cover all
necessary matters arising out of the complete transfer of responsibility from
British to Indian hands; it will make provision, in accordance with the
undertakings given by His Majesty's Government, for the protection of racial and
religious minorities , but will not impose any restriction on the power of the Indian
Union to decide in the future its relation to the other Member States of the British
Commonwealth.
Whether or not an Indian State elects to adhere to the Constitution, it will be necessary
to negotiate a revision of its Treaty arrangements, so far as this may be required in the
new situation.

(d) the constitution-making body shall be composed as follows, unless the leaders of
Indian opinion in the principal communities agree upon some other form before the end
of hostilities:
Immediately upon the result being known of the provincial elections which will
be necessary at the end of hostilities, the entire membership of the Lower Houses of
the Provincial Legislatures shall, as a single electoral college, proceed to the
election of the constitution-making body by the system of proportional
representation. This new body shall be in number about one-tenth of the number
of the Electoral College. Indian States shall be invited to appoint representatives in
the same proportion to their total population as in the case of the representatives
of British India as a whole, and with the same powers as the British Indian members.

(e) During the critical period which now faces India and until the new Constitution can
be framed His Majesty's Government must inevitably bear the responsibility for and retain
control and direction of the defence of India as part of their world war effort, but the task
of organising to the full the military, moral and material resources of India must be the
responsibility of the Government of India with the co-operation of the peoples of India.
His Majesty's Government desire and invite the immediate and effective participation of
the leaders of the principal sections of the Indian people in the counsels of their country,
of the Commonwealth and of the United Nations. Thus they will be enabled to give their
active and constructive help in the discharge of a tank which is vital and essential for the
future freedom of India.” 38
Dr. M. Moiz Khan
Assistant Professor
Dept. of History, University of Karachi
0322-2391591, moiz200@yahoo.com

38
Coupland, The Indian Problem, 336-337

56
Quit India Movement:
In reaction the Congress party said they do not accept the proposals offered by Sir
Stafford Cripps. They said Japan does not have any enmity with India. If British leave
India there is no threat of Japanese invasion. So British should give complete
independence and leave India as soon as possible. To further pressurize British the
Congress started a political movement “Quit India” movement. In this movement they
demanded British to immediately leave India and give it independence. Although this
movement was unable to achieve its objectives at that time but in the longer run it became
helpful to make British realize that now Indians are unwilling to allow them to manipulate
India. Dr. M. Moiz Khan
Assistant Professor
Dept. of History, University of Karachi
Divide and Quit India: 0322-2391591, moiz200@yahoo.com
On the other hand Muslim League was also not satisfied with the proposals of Sir
Stafford Cripps. They said his proposals do no talk about the creation of Pakistan. So
Muslim League cannot accept anything without Pakistan being offered in it. Muslims
were also suspicious of the Quit India Movement because it did not consider the demand
of Muslims of separate homeland. So Muslims League started “Divide and Quit India”
movement. Through this movement Muslims of sub -continent gave a clear message to
British and Congress that they wanted independence and separation from Hindus.

Gandhi Jinnah Talks 1944:

In 1944 Lord Wavell became Viceroy of India. He was man of moderate
approach towards the problems. To create the feeling to reconciliation and brotherhood
he released many political prisoners. Gandhi was also released during this time, who was
in jail due to his Quit India movement. After coming out of jail he immediately contacted
Jinnah to talk about the future of Muslims in India.
Jinnah agreed and the meetings were held at Jinnah’s home in Bombay. The first
thing Gandhi said was that Congress and Muslim League should come over their
differences and join hands to get rid of British. He said we need to work together to send
British back to England and then we will talk about the rights and problems of India after
we get Independence. He said this is our internal matter. Jinnah was staunch enough to
understand that it was a trap in which Congress wanted Muslims to fell. He knew it well
that once British leave India without deciding the issue of Muslim separate home land
Congress will do anything to suppress the voices of Muslims and will not give them their
rights. Jinnah refused this offer.
Secondly Gandhi tried to argue that Muslims of India do not have proper ground
to ask for a separate home land with in India. He said there are two types of Muslim s in
India and both of them cannot ask for a separate home land. The first type he said are
those who have come from other parts of the world and stayed in India for example,
Arabs, Turks, Persian and Afghans. In this case if they want their homeland then they
should return back to their countries. Secondly there are those Muslims who are the
57