Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Khemani2009
Khemani2009
intubated and mechanically ventilated during this having a PEEP ⱕ 6 cm H2O and 97% having a
period were included in the study, this calculated PEEP ⱕ 8 cm H2O (Fig 2, top). There was little
prevalence likely represents a minimum proportion variability with PEEP choice among centers, and
of intubated patients. although the median PEEP was statistically different
A subset of 1,457 patients with respiratory failure among centers (p ⫽ 0.012 [Kruskal-Wallis test]), this
had no arterial blood gas measurements available for finding was due largely to differences between only
computation of the PF. Although there may have two centers (Scheffé test for multiple comparisons)
been more patients without an arterial line who were [Fig 2, bottom]. The median Fio2 was 0.35, with
not enrolled in the prone-positioning study for other 81% of all patients having an Fio2 ⱕ 0.4, 96% having
reasons, this finding represents at least 15% of all the an Fio2 ⱕ 0.5, and 99% having an Fio2 ⱕ 0.65 (Fig
patients receiving mechanical ventilation during the 3, top). Again, there was some variability in Fio2
period of study. Within this subset, 1,052 patients
among centers, although the variation was predom-
had information available regarding Fio2, and 840
inantly due to only two centers (p ⬍ 0.001 [Kruskal-
patients had information on PEEP available. The
Wallis test]; Scheffé test for multiple comparisons)
median PEEP was 5 cm H2O (71%), with 90%
[Fig 3, bottom].
A subset of 904 patients without an arterial line
had information available on both Fio2 and Spo2.
Ventilated Patients by Center For those patients with a documented Spo2 ⱕ 97%
(n= 5385) and a concurrent Fio2, an SF was calculated. In
0.70
previous work,11–13 we have found that SFs ⬍ 270
0.60 correspond to PFs ⬍ 300. Using these criteria, 104
0.50
of these 904 patients would have met the oxygen-
ation criteria for ALI.
0.40 A total of 8,225 patients had information on a
Proportion
tion, and reactive airway disease, constituted 20% of help to determine the feasibility of future trials on
the subset. Nonpulmonary conditions, including different subgroups of ventilated patients.
neuromuscular disease, cerebral hypertension, spinal Moreover, when looking to design future trials on
instability, abdominal wounds, heart failure, and ALI, it is important to consider that at least 25% of
other diagnoses, constituted 26% of patient condi- patients with respiratory failure do not fulfill the
tions. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and radiographic criteria for ALI and ARDS. From this
do-not-resuscitate conditions each were responsible data set, it is difficult to get an overall estimate of the
for 2% of the patients, and lung or bone marrow prevalence of ALI in children receiving mechanical
transplantation together constituted 2% of patients ventilation. There were several patients with a con-
in PICUs (Table 3). current condition that precluded them from lying
prone or for whom information about bilateral pul-
monary infiltrates or PF was not available. At least
Discussion
60% of patients did not have bilateral pulmonary
Data from this cross-section of 16 US PICUs infiltrates, had congenital heart disease, or had con-
demonstrate that mechanical ventilation occurs com- gestive heart failure. However, within the remaining
monly in these settings, although the reasons for 40% of patients, we do not know how many met
ventilation are quite diverse. Given this heterogene- other criteria for ALI. It is likely that several patients
ity, this study should be used to gauge the relative with, for example, abdominal wounds, cerebral hy-
frequency of different diagnostic categories for pertension, and neuromuscular disease would meet
which children require mechanical ventilation and the criteria for ALI.
The reported prevalence of ALI and ARDS varies (eg, ALI vs ARDS), the arterial blood gas criteria
greatly. Farias et al1 reported that 2% of all children may be too stringent. Looking at just the time of
who receive mechanical ventilation for ⬎ 12 h have active enrollment for the prone study, a total of 8,017
ARDS, echoing previous findings by Timmons et al.14 patients were screened. Within this group, 7,833 did
However, this percentage is lower than the 7.6% not meet the study inclusion criteria or met some
reported by Randolph et al,2 who examined patients exclusion criteria. Eight-two patients met the criteria
who had received ventilation for ⬎ 24 h but did not for ALI but were not enrolled because of parent
have confirmatory chest radiograph results and instead refusal, language barriers, issues of consent, or
relied on physician coding of ARDS. As expected, the missed enrollment windows. When combined with
prevalence of ALI is higher, ranging from 6.2 to 9.9% the 102 patients who were randomized for the study,
of children who received mechanical ventilation for a overall 184 patients met the diagnostic criteria for
minimum of 12 or 24 h.15,16 ALI. However, an additional 104 patients would
It also appears from our data that children with have met the oxygenation criteria for ALI if the
more severe lung injury may have arterial blood gas noninvasive surrogate of SF was used when PF was
data available to calculate PFs. In general, most not available. Therefore, one can estimate that an
patients who are managed without arterial lines are additional 36% of patients could be captured for
receiving modest ventilator support, with 90% hav- studies on ALI if this surrogate measure for arterial
ing a PEEP ⱕ 6 cm H2O and 96% having an Fio2 PF is substituted.
ⱕ 0.5. Nonetheless, when attempting to design stud- Finally, these data highlight the difficulty of de-
ies that target patients with less severe lung injury signing an adequately powered study using mortality