Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

□ CASE REPORT □

Diffuse Liver Infiltration by Melanoma of Unknown


Primary Origin: One Case Report and Literature Review

Guo-Dong Shan, Guo-Qiang Xu, Li-Hua Chen, Zhao-Ming Wang, En-Yun Jin, Feng-Ling Hu
and You-Ming Li

Abstract
Diffuse liver infiltration by melanoma of unknown primary origin is rare. We encountered a unique case of
diffuse liver infiltration by melanoma of unknown primary origin in our hospital. A 62-year-old woman was
referred to our hospital for anorexia of 6 months duration and abdominal distension for 1 month. Ultra-
sonography (US), computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed an obvi-
ous enlarged liver without detectable nodules. She was diagnosed as liver metastasis by melanoma of un-
known primary origin via percutaneous liver biopsy. The report demonstrates the difficulty of making a non-
invasive diagnosis of diffuse hepatic infiltration on metastatic melanoma.

Key words: liver metastasis, melanoma, unknown primary origin

(Inter Med 48: 2093-2096, 2009)


(DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.48.2542)

Her past medical history revealed neck pain for over 1 year,
Introduction which was treated occasionally with Chinese traditional
medicine. She had no history of liver disease, alcohol abuse
Liver metastases are diagnosed in 10%-20% of patients or pulmonary tuberculosis. Her family history was not sig-
with melanoma, and are associated with a bad prognosis and nificant. Physical examination showed that her vital signs
short survival time rates (1). Since masses in the liver have were normal, and no pigmentation nor superficial nodular
a previous history of melanoma, most liver metastases from lesion was observed in her body. Her skin and sclera were
melanoma are easy to diagnose. slightly yellow colored. The liver was palpable 10 cm below
We present here a case of melanoma of unknown primary the costal margin and the spleen was not palpable. Viral se-
origin which was diagnosed by percutaneous liver biopsy. In rological and autoimmune markers were all negative. Serum
this case, US, CT and MRI showed a hepatomegaly without tumor markers of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic
detectable nodules. To our knowledge, only two cases of antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 199 (CA199) were all
diffuse liver infiltration by skin melanoma have been previ- normal except for elevated cancer antigen 125 (CA125)
ously reported (2, 3). In order to facilitate a better under- (49.87 U/mL, normal range <35 U/mL). PPD test was nega-
standing of melanoma, we report this case and review the tive. The ascites was clear light yellow, and no malignant
literature. cells were detected. The serum-ascites albumin gradient
(SAAG) was 11.9 g/L. Ziehl-Neelsen stain of the ascites
Case Report was negative for TB. The remaining biochemical parameters
were normal. An abdominal CT and MRI revealed hepa-
A 62-year-old woman was referred to our hospital for tomegaly without focal lesions, a small amount of ascites
anorexia of 6 months duration and abdominal distension for and a slightly depressed inferior vena cava due to the en-
1 month. Abdominal ultrasound examination in a local hos- larged liver (Figs.1 and 2). CT scan showed no tumors in
pital showed hepatomegaly and ascites. She had no fever or the lung or head. No tumor was found by gastroscopy,
night sweats, and no contact with sick persons or animals. colonoscopy, or video capsule endoscopy. No tumor was

Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
Received for publication June 2, 2009; Accepted for publication August 17, 2009
Correspondence to Dr. Guo-Qiang Xu, xgqhangzhou@sohu.com

2093
Inter Med 48: 2093-2096, 2009 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.48.2542

Fi
gur
e1 . Contr
ast-
enha
ncedcompute
dt omog
raphy(CT)
:enl
arg
edl
ive
rwi
tho
uti
ndi
vidua
lle
-
si
onandi
nfer
iorvenacavas
li
ght
lydepres
sedbyli
ver
.

Fi
gur
e2 . Magnet
icres
onanc
eimag
ing(MRI
):e
nla
rge
dli
ver
.wi
tho
uti
ndi
vidua
lle
sio
nandi
nfe
ri
orve
nacavas
lig
htlydepr
ess
edbyl
ive
r.

found by urogenital, otolaryngologic, and ophthamologic ex-


aminations. Because of uncertainty of her diagnosis, the pa- Discussion
tient was treated symptomatically with fluid restriction,
Transmetil and Diammonium Glycyrrhizinate (JiangsuChia- Malignant melanoma is a cancer of melanocytes, usually
Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., China). in skin. It can be highly aggressive, with as many as 20% of
A percutaneous liver biopsy was performed which dem- patients developing metastases (4). Liver metastasis, in par-
onstrated hepatic intrasinusoidal infiltration by malignant ticular, has been shown to portend a grave prognosis, with a
melanoma cells (Fig. 3). Immunohistochemically, the tumor median survival time of approximately 4 months (5). Mela-
cells were immunostained positive for HMB-45 and MelanA noma occasionally occurs as apparent metastasis to lymph
proteins. nodes or viscera without a detectable or known primary le-
The patient’s clinical course continued to worsen after ad- sion. Such melanomas of unknown primary site (MUP) are
mission and he became markedly jaundiced and showed en- estimated to comprise between 3.7% and 6% of all incident
cephalopathy on the 23rd hospital day; the patient died of melanomas (6-14). Diagnostic criteria for MUP initially
hepatic failure on the 31st hospital day. Her biochemical were proposed in 1963 by Dasgupta et al (6). Contemporary
course is summarized in Table 1. After a definitive diagno- criteria for the diagnosis include the following: 1) metastatic
sis, she received a herbal remedy and refused to receive any melanoma confirmed clinically, histologically, and immuno-
Western medication. histochemically; 2) the absence of a previous cutaneous tu-
mor, pigmented or not, destroyed or excised without his-

2094
Inter Med 48: 2093-2096, 2009 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.48.2542

Fi
gure3A. Pa t
holog
icalres
ult
:t he speci
men
wascove
red wit
h ala r
genumbero fme l
anoma
ce
ll
s(He ma t
oxyli
na ndEosi
ns t
aini
ng,orig
ina
l Fig
ure3C. Immuno
his
tochemi
cals
tai
ningo
fthel
ive
rbi
-
magni
fi
cati
on×400) opsys
pec
ime
nwi t
hHMB- 4
5 .

and B-ultrasonography, CT and MRI scan did not show a


widened main portal vein (PV) and hepatic vein (HV) steno-
sis. So this case was not diagnosed as HVOD.
The liver is one of the most frequently involved organs in
disseminated non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas, and may be de-
tected in up to 40% of patients at the time of initial stag-
ing (17). Few patients with lymphoma have diffuse liver in-
filtration and present with hepatomegaly. The diagnosis of
lymphoma should be considered. However, in the present
patient, imaging studies and physical examination showed
no enlarged lymph nodes in the body and bone marrow bi-
Figur
e3 B. I
mmunohi
sto
chemi
cals t
aini
ng o
f opsy presented no sign of lymphoma. All of these findings
theli
verbi
ops
yspe
cime
nwi t
hMe l
anA. ruled out lymphoma.
At last, liver biopsy was performed which demonstrated
hepatic intrasinusoidal infiltration by malignant melanoma
cells. But this patient had no previous history of melanoma.
tologic examination; and 3) exclusion of unusual primary In order to find the primary site, the patient was underwent
sites, including urogenital, otolaryngologic, or oph- a series of examination including physical examination, im-
thamologic sites. A retrospective analysis of 40 patients di- aging studies and endoscopy. However, various examinations
agnosed with melanoma as MUP revealed that 65% of the verified that the disease was confined to the liver. According
patients presented with lymph node metastasis only, 28% to the criteria for MUP, this patient was diagnosed as a
presented with visceral lesions, and 8% presented with sub- melanoma of unknown primary site.
cutaneous nodules (15). In the present patient, only liver Anbari et al reported that in 40 patients of MUP, 20%
metastasis was found. had a history of regressed skin lesions. In none of those
In the present case, imaging studies revealed hepa- cases was there a clinically apparent area of regression sug-
tomegaly and slight ascites accumulation. Liver function test gestive of regressed melanoma. Dysplastic nevi were noted
was slightly abnormal. Serum tumor markers of AFP, CEA, in 22.5% of the patients in series. The prevalence of dys-
and CA199 were normal. Hepatic tumor was initially con- plastic nevi and regressed skin lesion in the MUP patients
sidered to be impossible. Gynura root is widely used in Chi- suggested the likelihood of a primary cutaneous origin for
nese traditional medicine and it can lead to hepatic veno- the metastatic melanoma (15).
occlusive disease (HVOD) in some patients (16). The pre- Twenty days after the diagnosis, the present patient died
sent patient had in the past taken a lot of traditional medi- of fulminant hepatic failure. To our knowledge, only four
cine to treat neck pain, however, she was not sure whether cases of fulminant hepatic failure secondary to malignant
she had ingested Gynura root. Because of her long-term use melanoma were previously reported. Autopsy revealed that
of traditional medicine, gradually ascending bilirubin, hepa- the liver was almost completely occupied by melanoma cells
tomegaly and ascites, a clinical diagnosis of HVOD was not in these patients (2, 3, 18, 19). The increasing size of the
excluded. The main clinical signs and symptoms of HVOD liver ruled out fulminant hepatitis as a cause, since the liver
were caused by portal hypertension. However, in this pa- would be expected to shrink in a patient with fulminant
tient, esophageal varices was not indicated by endoscopy, hepatitis (20). The mechanisms of rapid liver failure here

2095
Inter Med 48: 2093-2096, 2009 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.48.2542

Ta
ble1
. Se
rum Bi
oche
mic
alPa
rame
ter
saf
terAdmi
ssi
on
Biochemical parameters(Normal values) day2 day9 day16 day23 day30
ALB(35-55g/L) 33.5 32.2 31. 28 27
ALT(3-50U/L) 17 117 286 578 1652
AST(3-40U/L) 53 120 473 942 2103
TB(1.0-22µmol/L) 80 88 99 153 306
DB(1-7µmol/L) 52 56 63 115 213
AP(30-115U/L) 134 171 221 493 1021
GGTP(0-54U/L) 178 192 354 702 1902
PT(10.5-14.0s) 12.8 14.2 15.1 28 120
LDH(150-450U/L) 88 349 562 1282 4365
Ammonia(10-47µmol/L) 21 44 71 98 134
ALB=albumin;ALT=lanine aminotransferase;AST=aspartate aminotransferase;TB=
total bilurubin; DB=direct bilurubin;
AP=alkalinephosphatase;GGTP=gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase;PT=prothrombin
time.LDH=lactate dehydrogenase

seemed more related to simple replacement of liver by mela- diffuse intrasinusoidal liver metastasis from other diseases,
noma rather than by a process of parenchymal infarction such as fatty infiltration, hepatitis, lymphoma and HVOD.
and necrosis. The present case report demonstrates the difficulty of mak-
When imaging indicates diffuse liver enlargement without ing a noninvasive diagnosis of diffuse hepatic infiltration by
an individual nodular lesion, it is difficult to differentiate metastatic melanoma.

References
1. Rose DM, Essner R, Hughes TD, et al. Surgical resection for me- 11. Reintgen DS, McCarty KS, Woodard B, Cox E, Seigler HF. Me-
tastatic melanoma to the liver. The John Wayne Cancer Institute tastatic malignant melanoma with an unknown primary. Surg Gy-
and Sydney Melanoma Unit Experience. Arch Surg 136: 950-955, necol Obstet 156: 335-340, 1983.
2001. 12. Panagopoulos E, Murray D. Metastatic malignant melanoma of
2. Bouloux PM, Scott RJ, Goligher JE, Kindell C. Fulminant hepatic unknown primary origin: a study of 30 cases. J Surg Oncol 23: 8-
failure secondary to diffuse liver infiltration by melanoma. J R 10, 1983.
Soc Med 79: 302-303, 1986. 13. Wong JH, Cagle LA, Morton DL. Surgical treatment of lymph
3. Jose L, Montero JM, Sivia DL, Heras RO, Enrique F, Manuel nodes metastatic melanoma from unknown primary site. Arch
DM. Acute liver failure caused by diffuse hepatic melanoma infil- Surg 122: 1380-1383, 1987.
tration. J Hepatolo 37: 540-541, 2002. 14. Velez A, Walsh D, Karakousis CP. Treatment of unknown primary
4. Houghton A, Coit D, Bloomer W, et al. NCCN melanoma practice melanoma. Cancer 68: 2579-2581, 1991.
guidelines: National comprehensive cancer network. Oncology 15. Anbari KK, Schuchter LM, Bucky LP, et al. Melanoma of un-
(Williston Park) 12: 153-177, 1998. known primary site: presentation, treatment, and prognosis: a sin-
5. Balch CM, Soong SJ, Murad TM, Smith JW, Maddox WA, Durant gle institution study. University of Pennsylvania Pigmented Lesion
JR. A mutifactorial analysis of melanoma. IV. Prognostic factors Study Group. Cancer 79: 1816-1821, 1997.
in 200 melanoma patients with distant metastases. J Clin Oncol 1: 16. Dai N, Yu YC, Ren TH, et al. Gynura root induces hepatic veno-
126-134, 1983. occlusive disease: A case report and review of the literature.
6. Dasgupta T, Bowden L, Berg JW. Malignant melanoma of un- World J Gastroenterol 13: 1628-1631, 2007.
known primary origin. Surg Gynecol Obstet 117: 341-345, 1963. 17. Emile JF, Azoulay D, Gornet JM, et al. Primary non-Hodgkin’s
7. Katz KA, Jonasch E, Hodi FS, et al. Melanoma of unknown pri- lymphomas of the liver with nodular and diffuse in filtration pat-
mary: the patient with an unknown site of primary origin. Arch terns have different prognoses. Ann Oncol 12: 1005-1010, 2001.
Surg 110: 896-900, 2005. 18. Tanaka M, Watanabe S, Masaki T, et al. Fulminant hepatic failure
8. Milton GW, Shaw HM, McCarthy WH. Occult primary malignant caused by malignant melanoma of unknown primary origin. J
melanoma: factors influencing survival. Br J Surg 64: 805-808, Gastroenterol 39: 804-806, 2004.
1977. 19. Te HS, Schiano TD, Kahaleh M, et al. Fulminant hepatic failure
9. Katz KA, Jonasch E, Hodi FS. Melanoma of unknown primary: secondary to malignant melanoma: case report and review of the
experience at Massachusetts General Hospital and Dana-Farber literature. Am J Gastroenterol 94: 262-266, 1999.
Cancer Institute. Melanoma Res 15: 77-82, 2005. 20. Wroblewski F, Ladue JS. Serum glutamic-oxaloacetic-transaminase
10. Giuliano AE, Moseley HS, Morton DL. Clinical aspects of un- activity as an index of liver cell injury from cancer. Cancer 8:
known primary melanoma. Ann Surg 191: 98-104, 1980. 1155-1163, 1955.

Ⓒ 2009 The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine


http://www.naika.or.jp/imindex.html

2096

You might also like