Professional Documents
Culture Documents
!!!!! Dionysiac Aspects of Kushān Art
!!!!! Dionysiac Aspects of Kushān Art
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/4629244?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ars Orientalis
THIS OBSERVATION BY THE GREAT ALFRED The most spectacular sculptural forms
Foucher recalls most eloquently a striking of this imagery occur on Mathuran double-
and often overlooked aspect of Kushan sided relief blocks, of which the so-called
sculptural imagery. In using the term "dio- Stacy Silenus and Palikhera block are the
nysiac," I must explain at the outset that it best known examples. Both are so familiar,
should be understood not simply as that in fact, that it may seem redundant to de-
which may be associated with any specific scribe in detail the features which lend them
theme from the classical repertoire but their markedly dionysiac character; yet,
rather in a freely improvised generic sense despite all that has been written about these
appropriate within the context of the Ku- extraordinary works, the essential problem
shan world. This would include all the of their usage and inherent meaning re-
varied and curiously bacchanalian scenes mains unresolved.
of wine drinking, drunken and amorous The Stacy Silenus was brought to light
carousal, harvesting, and pressing of grapes, in I 836 by Colonel L. R. Stacy who sug-
in addition to the symbols of the grapevine, gested that it might have been the base of
grape cluster, and wine vessel. Since a pure- an offering vessel or aEewQQavrtwov used for
p. 242. See also J. Ph. Vogel, Catalogue of the and Yakshas": no. C 4 (seated Kubera-type hold-
Archaeological Museum at Mathura, Allahabad, ing cup in right hand, sack or mongoose in left,
I 9 I 0, p. 8 3, pl. I 3; Smith, p. I 3 6, fig. 8o; Foucher,with a female on either side, one of whom holds
vol. 2, p. I49, p. 604, fig. 492; Rosenfield, p. 248, a pitcher). The group is surmounted by a solid
fig. 47; V. S. Agrawala, A Catalogue of Images of projection and may have been a bowl support, ac-
Brahma, Vishnu, and giva in Mathura art, Journal cording to Agrawala; no. C S (seated Kubera-type
of the United Provinces Historical Society, vol. holding a sack in left hand and a cup in right into
22, 1949, pp. I94-196. (Mathura Museum no. C 2, which a female pours liquid from a pitcher); no.
ht. 5 1/2".) C 6, badly broken Kubera-type image which orig-
6 The tankard seems to be an unusual goblet- inally held grapes in one hand and a cup in the
form to which a handle has been added. The deco- other (cf. Vogel, Catalogue, p 87); also nos. C 8,
ration consists of schematized rosettes on the body, C9, CIO, CII, C24, C25, C26, C27, C28,
and a band of lotus ornament around the juncture C2g, KT55, I38, 240, 242, 244, KT246, 499,
of the body and the foot. The closest pottery shape 594, et. al. The use of the cup attribute persisted
to this is a footed vessel with a loop handle found well into Gupta times, if not longer. These images
at Taxila and called a censer (J. Marshall, Taxila, were probably not all specifically Kubera but any
Cambridge, i95 I, vol. i, p. 286, Vol. 2, p.42I, of a constellation of royal Yaksha-types, similar
nos. I33-I34, vol. 3, pl. i25, nos. I33-I34). The in form and function. One such was published by
decoration recalls that of a schist goblet from K. D. Bajpai (A new inscribed image of a Yaksha,
Taxila (Ibid., vol. 2, p. 492, nos. 6o-6i, vol. 3, pl. in India Antiqua, Leiden, I947, pp. 7-8). It bears
I4I, j and pl. I43, o). Marshall calls this a cibori- an inscription rendered by the author: "The Ma-
um. It has a heavy stemmed foot but no handle. haraja, Graha Yaksha, called Dharmanitya, makes
The decoration consists of lotus-leaves in a band it known that in his hand is the prasada of the
springing upward from the stem, and quatrefoil god." The image (Mat. Mus. no. 3232) is that of a
rosettes between dogtooth borders on the body. seated pot-bellied Yaksha, nimbate and holding a
7 See Rosenfield, p. 248, fig. 47, a. cup and a fruit. From its inscription it is not Ku-
8 There are, in the Mathura Museum, numer- bera, but a Graha (Guhya?) Yaksha named Dhar-
ous images of the Kubera-type, either singly or at- manitya. If he is a Guhya he would be an attend-
tended by one or more females. Almost all hold a ant of Kubera, lord of the Guhyas (guhyapati).
cup or goblet, while the other attributes vary. See Since the fruit and vessel ostensibly belong to Ku-
Agrawala, JUPHS, vol. 22, chap. XIX, "Kubera bera, he appears to hold them on his behalf.
huizen believes,16 their carved decoration relief panels that some of the single bowl-
has much in common with the bacchana- bearing Yakshas were used to contain
lian blocks. The Palikhera bowl is cylindri- flower offerings, but we cannot assume
cal and flat-bottomed, displaying a band that all related forms were intended as
of ornament containing a running vine such.23The theories of both Vogel and Coo-
motive of asoka flowers, grapes, and othermaraswamy are plausible and may be ac-
fruit above a design of schematized lotus cepted in many instances; yet they do not
petals."7 The vine issues from the mouth of satisfactorily explain one essential icono-
a squatting Yaksha, encircles the bowl, and graphic problem. If the Stacy and Pali-
returns to be held by the same figure. A
khera blocks were used as bases for offer-
second Mathuran stone vase of unknown
ing bowls or ablution vessels, why do they
provenance is rounded in contour and dis-
specifically allude to a Yaksha bacchanale
plays a similar lotus petal design below a
and to wine as the vehicle of their intoxica-
band of running grape-and-leaf pattern.18 tion?
There can be little doubt that most if
A uniquely Mathuran variation on the
not all the works described above were,
theme of drunken Yakshas may be found
like the Pitalkhora Yaksha, intended for
on a second series of pedestal blocks dis-
some use in or around a Buddhist shrine.
playing the motive of an unsteady female
The Palikhera bowl bears a dedicatory in-
supported by a male and a child. This
scription to the Mahasamghika sect,'9 and
group includes three works, from Nar6l!,
the head of a Yaksha pedestal figure from
Jamna Bagh was donated by one Ayala,
MahOli, and Tusaran Bihar respectively,
son of Imdrasama for the Suvanakara- which follow the models of the Palikhera
vihara, according to its inscription.20 Vogeland Stacy blocks, but are more indigenous-
maintained that these bowl-and-pedestal
forms were meant for pious offerings of
the faithful, and that the stone vessels re- 16 van Lohuizen-de Leeuw, India Antiqua, p.
235. The central panel of a stambha (pl. VII, f.,
presented the pinda-patra of the Buddha.2'
Mat. Mus. no. J 6o) shows two laymen depositing
Coomaraswamy, however, noted that the a garland in a large bowl on a pediment. It is im-
stone vases are unlike the Buddha's alms possible to tell whether the bowl has any promi-
bowl in shape, and that the ornamentation nent decorative features.
of a pinda-patra was explicitly prohibited 17 Vogel, Sculpture de Mathur4, p. 54, p. 76,
pl. XLVIII, b.
by Vinaya rule. He, in turn, suggested that
18 Ibid., pl. XLVIII, a.
since the Yaksha pedestal figures are con-
19 See H. Liiders, Mathura Inscriptions, Got-
nected with the idea of liquid, either water tingen, I96I, p. I65 (I43 d), insc. no. I25.
or intoxicating liquor, that they should be 20 Ibid., p. I22 (97 a), incs. no. 89.
interpreted as ablution bowls (zcamana- 21 Vogel, Sculpture de Mathursa, pp. 55-56.
kumbhi or acama-kumbhi), ". . . regularly 22 A Coomaraswamy, Yaksas, Washington,
placed at the entrances to Buddhist shrines D.C., I928, I93I, pt. II, p. 65.
23 See van Lohuizen-de Leeuw, India Anti-
to hold water for washing the hands and qua, pp. 234-235. She has proved this by her
feet of the visiting worshipper."22 We know illustrations of flower offerings in bowls (pl.
from their representation on Mathuran XVII, d, e, f).
ly Indian in style and subject.24 The best This same theme also occurs in relief scene
preserved, from Maholi (fig. 2), shows a fe-on two stone toilet trays from Gandhara.
male of Yakshi or Devata type seemingly One, from an unknown site in Swat, de-
on the verge of collapse with her left knee picts a nude standing male with his arms
resting on the ground. Her right arm is draped over two robed females, one of
held by a male companion and her left is whom holds a cup (fig. 3).27 The other,
draped limply over the shoulder of a found in the Parthian stratum at Sirkap,
young girl who carries a footed goblet. Anrepresents a bearded male in a short robe
older personage of indeterminate sex stands either striding or dancing while supported
to one side with the left hand on the chest by a female on either side.28 Both of these
and the right pointing to the mouth in appear to be of pre-Kushan date, and the
what seems to be a gesture of surprise.25 first in particular recalls the classical theme
The opposite side of the block shows a fe- of the drunken Dionysos or Silenus; yet it
male with an umbrella who turns toward would be hasty to conclude that it was in-
a dancing lady on her left. The dancer ap- tended as such by its creator.
pears to be holding something in her left A similar theme may even be found at
hand which may be the end of a scarf or a Sa-nchi, although it is usually given a much
tree branch. A male onlooker is represent- different interpretation. A panel from the
ed on the right side of the scene, and an- west pillar of the South Gateway of Stupa
other male, now headless, stands behind I displays a scene designated by Marshall
the first with hands on his shoulder and and Foucher as the grief stricken Asoka
right arm, and seems to be whispering mourning the death of the Buddha's sacred
something to him in confidence.26 tree.29 Here we may see a royal figure sup-
In all the pedestal blocks described ported by two of a group of solicitous
above, the common motive is that of a court ladies who surround him. One of the
drunken reveler whose balance is precari- group holds an umbrella over him, and an-
ously maintained by a pair of attendants. other carries a pitcher with an overturned
cup as a lid. Garlands hanging on pegs are
24 For the Nar6li block, see R. Chanda,
ASIAR, 1922-23, p. I67, pl. 38, b. For the frag- represented on the right side of the group.30
mentary block from Tusaran Bihar, see A. Cun-
ningham, ASIR, vol. II, I875-78, pp. 64-66, pl. 27 E. Barger and P. Wright, Excavations in
XX. For the Mahal! block see V. S. Agrawala, A Swat and Explorations in the Oxus Territories of
new Bodhisattva and a bacchanalian group from Afghanistan, Memoirs of the Archaeological Sur-
Mathursi, JISOA, vol. 6, I938, pp. 70-72, pIS. vey of India, no. 64, I94I, pl. VIII, 4, no. 2I.
XXI-XXII. 28 Marshall, Taxila, vol. i, p. i68, VOl. 2, p.
25 Agrawala, JISOA, I938, pp. 70-7I. Agra- 495 no. 66, vol. 3, pl. 144, no. 66. This may not
wala calls the figure a hermaphrodite harem-at- actually represent a dance but may be a clumsy
tendant, and the gesture, the vismaya attitude. I attempt to show movement.
cannot see a family group here or, as Codrington 29 J. Marshall and A. Foucher, Monuments of
supposes, some scene involving the birth of the San-chi, Calcutta, 1940, vol. I, p. 2I2, vol. 2, pl.
Buddha (see Art of India and Pakistan, ed. L. Ash- i8b2. See also vol.3, pl.79, 27b, for a similar
ton, London, I947, p. 25) (Mathura Museum, no. relief from Stupa II.
2800, ht. 3'4"). 30 Ibid., vol. 2, pl. I 8. Between scenes a 3 and
26 Agrawala, loc. cit., pl. XXII. b3 the border decoration is a running grapevine
Whatever the identity of the royal per- manufacture and consumption of wine oc-
sonage may be, his unsteady posture, to- curs on a relief in the Peshawar Museum
gether with the festive atmosphere of the (fig. 5), beginning in the center where two
scene, could easily evoke the idea of a vintagers tramp grapes in a vat with a lion-
courtly drinking party. headed spout from which the juices flow
Even more numerous depictions of into a shallow vessel, while a third vintager
dionysiac activities are found in the relief supplies more grape.s.33 To his right, two
sculpture of Kushan Gandhara. One such more workers supervise the filtration of
relief (fig. 4) now in the Lahore Museum the liquid through a bag suspended on a
shows four scenes separated by vinestocks tripod. In the last scene on the right side
with overhanging branches and leaves.31 In of the panel the process reaches its logical
the center a naked Silenus rides a lion while conclusion as two revelers pour wine from
holding a cup in his right hand, and to his a large vase into the mouth of a third who
immediate right, a lady in long robes offers lies beneath them. The scene on the far left
his mount an object, probably a bowl to side, although badly abraded, shows a
drink from, as seen in representations of royal personage wearing a wreath, seated
Gandharan amorini and their vehicles.32 on a throne equipped with a canopy sus-
On their left a vintager tramps grapes in a pended on poles.34 In his left hand he holds
rectangular vat with a spout, and a second a spear, the end of which rests against his
vintager carries in a basket of grapes to be right foot. His right hand is raised, either
added to the vat. On the opposite side ap- in gesture or to hold an object which is
pears an embracing couple, and to the far now missing. Standing male attendants on
right a naked amorino playfully pulls the either side of the throne turn toward their
mane of the lion he is riding, while a second master, one gesturing with his right hand
places a krater of wine before the animal. and the other holding what may have been
A more thorough representation of the a vessel of some type.
In a discussion of this limited length it
which issues from an elephant's mouth. This clear-
would be impossible to include more than
ly shows the presence of this motive in India be-
fore the appearance of the Kushan vine scroll. a few of the better known examples of the
31 Foucher, vol. I, p. 246, fig. I29; Burgess, drinking or cup-bearing dionysiac figures
p. 39, pl. I44; Ingholt, p. 157, nO. 397; cf. Fou- of Gandhara sculpture. Perhaps the most
cher, vol. I, p. 25I, fig. 128 (Lahore Mus. no. remarkable of these is contained in a scene
I493).
carved between the lion-legs of a statue
32 See Ingholt, pp. i56-i57, no. 296 (a frag-
mentary relief in the Peshawar Museum of a cup-
bearing amorino riding a dragon while another J3 Ingholt, pp. I83-I84, no. I75.
offers the monster a drink from a cup); ibid., p. 34 Cf. Marshall, Taxila, vol. 2, Pp. II2-II3,
177, no. 453 (another work in the Peshawar Mu- no. 93, vOl. 3, p. 2I7, no. 93. This is a relief scene
seum of an amorino between the forepaws of a from the Dharmarajika Stiipa showing the instiga-
seated lion and offering the beast a drink from his tion of the bodhisattva by the gods. The future
cup); also A. Coomaraswamy, Catalogue of the Buddha is enthroned under a canopy with slender
Indian Collection in the Museum of Fine Arts, shafts which rise from acanthus capitals of Indo-
Boston, I923, no. .07.488; and Marshall, Taxila, Corinthian columns, and is obviously a royal bal-
vol. 2, p. 496, no. 72, vol. 3, pl. I44, no. 72. dachin.
landscape panels from the Northern and attired couple, carved on the right side of
Western gateways of Stupa I. The North- a bodhisattva group at Karl!, holds a ver-
ern Gateway relief shows two amorous tically fluted stemmed goblet,45 and at Na-
pairs seated on either side of a waterfall on garjunakonda goblet-bearing couples occur
a rocky hillside.41 The male of the couple with relative frequency.'
on the right side holds a cup for his lady, The idyllic scenes of the Sa-ichi gate-
who sits on his knee with her arm around ways portray an Elysium as seductive as
his neck (a pose reminiscent of that on the any from Roman Bacchic sarcophagi, but a
Lahore statue base). Below, in the fore- thoroughly Indian one, replete with lotus-
ground, two more sets of lovers cavort in filled pools, jewel producing trees, and
a pool with a pair of elephants who have playful lovers belonging to the mithuna
large lotuses in their trunks. In the panel tradition. V. S. Agrawala has suggested
from the Western Gateway, the setting is that such paradisical motives may illus-
a paradisical garden with rich vegetation, trate the fabulous Uttarakuru of Indian
scarf and jewelled-ornament producing legend, described in the Mahabharata as a
trees, and a lotus-filled pond.42 One of the land of jewel, ornament, and even garment
males appears to be picking a jewelled producing trees, where its inhabitants, per-
necklace or girdle from a tree for his mis- fect in dress and appearance, draw suste-
tress. Of the five pairs of lovers in the nance from the nectar of trees.47 At Bharhut
landscape, two display the identical gesture and Sa-nchi, however, the whole repertoire
of the offering of the cup to the coy female. of jewel and ornament producing vegeta-
It is not surprising that this same es- tion, particularly the lotus-vine, is most
sentially indigenous theme continued rela- closely related to Yakshas or Yaksha vehi-
tively unchanged in the Kushan Mathura cles, from whose mouths or navels they
school, where it may be seen among the often emanate.48 Yakshas themselves were
half-figures of couples on balconies above also considered to dwell in the paradise of
the elegant Yakshis of the Bhutesar railing Alaka, the happy abode of Kubera and his
pillars.43 Another similar motive occurs on hosts on Mt. Kailasa. In Kalidasa's Megha-
a Mathuran relief in the Museum of Eth-
nology in Munich, which shows a mithuna 45 Ibid.,VOl. 2, pl. I67.
pair, each of whom holds a heavy stemmed 46 See A. H. Longhurst, 7he Buddhist Anti-
goblet in a lovers' toast." Likewise in quities of Nagariunakonda, MASI, no. 54, I938,
Andhra sculpture, the male of a regally pI. XXXII, c, pl. XXXIII, b, pl. XXXIII, c, pl.
XXXVI, a, pl. XXXVIII, a, pl. XXXVIII, b. R.
Rao notes that the proferred cup of wine is com-
mon among the Nagarjunakonda mithunas (The
41 Soanchi, vol. 2, pl. 34b v (lower panel on Art of Nigarjunakonda, Madras, I956, p. 82).
front face of east pillar of Northern Gateway). 47 V. S. Agrawala, in introduction to A. Cun-
42 Ibid., vol. 2, pl. 64 C I (front face of north ningham's, The Stuipa of Bharhut, 2nd ed., Vara-
pillar of Western Gateway). nasi, I962, p. viii (Mahabharata vi, 6, 2o8 ff.).
43 Vogel, Sculpture de Mathura, pp. 30-31, 48 See Safichi, vol. 2, pl. 2 (Southern Gateway
pp. IOO-IO I, pl. XVIII, b and d, pl. XIX, b and c. lintel, Stiipa I); Coomaraswamy, Yaksas, pt. II,
44 L. Bachhofer, Early Indian Sculpture, New pp. 58-60, pl. I2, I, p1. I3, I, pl. 29, 5, pl. 30, 2,
York, I929, vol. 2, pl. IOO (left panel). pl. 34, I, pl. 34, 2.
49 J. Marshall, 7he Buddhist Art of Gand- produce and inhabit the lotus-vine. Rowland sees
hara, Cambridge, I960, pp. 58-59, pl. 54, fig. 78. the loving-couple as a possible nymph and satyr,
50 See B. Rowland, The Vine Scroll in Gand- but in Gandhara they are more appropriately a
hara, Artibus Asiae, vol. I9, i956 p. 3 5 3-36I and mithuna. See also Foucher, vol. I, p. 155, fig. 127
fig. i. Rowland discusses the very fine Gandharan (a similar medallion-vine frieze from Nutthu); B.
inhabited double-vine on a door jamb, now in the Dagans, M. le Berre, D. Schlumberger, Monuments
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston (no. 39. 36). Within pre'-islamiques d'Afghanistan, Memoires de la de'-
the medallions are consecutively a silenus drinking le'gation arche'ologique franfaise en Afghanistan,
from a rhyton, an amorous couple, a vintager with vol. I9, I964, p. 3I, nos. 8I-83, pl. XX (a frieze
a basket of grapes, another treading grapes with a in the Kabul Museum).
child on his shoulder, and an archer. Rowland's 51 Coomaraswamy, Yaksas, pt. II, pp. 49-
stylistic comparison with the medaillon vines of 50, pl. 50.
the Severid School at Leptis Magna is most ap- 52 See Vogel, Sculpture de Mathura, pp. 48-
propriate, but we cannot assume that, in the case 49, p. I 4, pl. XLI, a-b (a Naga image from
of the Gandharan inhabited vine, the figures were Chargaon appears to have held a goblet), pl.
introduced haphazardly, as from a copybook. The XLI, c (a Naga image from Kukargam holding a
silenus may be equated with a Kubera-type of goblet), pl. XLI, d (a Naga image of unknown
Yaksha, the vintagers with lesser Yakshas of Gand- provenance holding a kalasa). See also Agrawala,
hara who tend the vines and produce wine much JUPHS, 1949, chap. XXII, Naiga Images, nos.
as their Indian counterparts at Safichi literally C I4, 21, 439, 966, 1314, i6IO, 2665.
(fig. 9) shows a Nagaraja and his queen general posture and spear attribute of this
seated on a wide throne drinking from Pa'ncika image, and a number of others,
cups.53 On their left stand three Nagis immediately recalls the enthroned royal
holding vessels, one of which is a rhyton. figure of the Peshawar dionysiac panel.
Three more figures on the opposite side in- Ingholt is perhaps justified in noting that
clude a Nag! with a goblet, a wineskin this royal figure under a canopy was prob-
bearer pouring wine into a large krater, ably intended to be Paincika.Y The base of
and a female holding flowers or fruit. the well-known Paincika and Hariti group
Combaz has pointed out a possible prece- from Sahrf-Bahlol displays no less than
dent for this scene in a balustrade relief fourteen playful amorini-Yakshas and two
from Stupa I at Sanichi which shows the sileni, one of whom rides a donkey.58 Be-
adoration of the Bodhi Tree above a seated tween the royal couple is a small cup-bear-
Nagaraja surrounded on either side by ing attendant of a type often repeated in
Nagfs who entertain him with music and other images of the Gandharan Tutelary
share the contents of a shallow bowl.54 Pair.59 The persistent inclusion of this fig-
If the Gandharan Yakshas are fre- ure holding a drinking vessel suggests that
quently associated with dionysiac activi- this attribute had a significance similar to
ties, their chief, Pa"ncika, alter-ego of thethe vessel held by the Mathuran Kubera.
usually benign Mathuran Kubera, is no less In other Gandharan representations,
so. A typical Pafncika image, now in the the Tutelary Couple are actually shown
British Museum (fig. io), portrays the truc- equipped with drinking vessels. One such
ulent Yaksha senaopati seated between two relief, now in the British Museum (fig. ii),
tiny attendants on a high-backed throne shows them seated together on their usual
with a spear held diagonally in his left wide throne with a small adorant and the
hand.55 Above the throne back appear ubiquitous genius between them. Both Pain-
two more small figures. A relief panel on cika and Hariti appear to be drinking from
the base shows a reveler in tunic and trou- the cups which they hold. Another version
sers, possibly nimbate, seated on a recum- of the Tutelary Couple, from Takht-i-
bent lion while brandishing a cup in his Bahi, is of a distinctly different type (fig.
right hand. He is attended by an amorino I2).60 Here, the male, a less corpulent and
on his left and by a kneeling male and fe- more youthful beardless figure, wears a
male devotee. The male appears to offer a short tunic, greaves, and a fillet in his curly
large spirally wound object which Rosen- hair. The female is attired in a double chi-
field suggests might be a wine jar.56 The ton, with the remains of what probably
53 Foucher, vol. I, p. 256, fig. I 33,b; Marshall, 55 Foucher, vol. 2, p. II3, fig. 370; Rosen-
Buddhist Art, p. 6o, pl. 6, fig. 82. See also the field, p. 24S, fig. 75 .
companion panel to this one, showing the Naga- 56 Rosenfield, p. 245 .
raja alone on the throne entertained by Nagil mu- 17 Ingholt, p. I04.
sicians (Foucher, vol. I, p. 256, fig. I 3 3, a; Mar- 58 Ibid., p. I47, no. 342.
shall, Buddhist Art, p. 6o, pl. 56, fig. 83). 59 See Foucher, vOl.2, p.137, fig. 379, p. I45,
54 Combaz, vol. I, p. I 79, vol. 2, pl. I 23; fig. 382, p. 149, fig. 383.
Sadnchi, vol. 2, pl. 65 a2. 60 Rosenfield, p. 247, fig. 78.
was a polos on her head. She holds in her It is evident from the wealth and vari-
left hand a cornucopia with an animal- ety of the imagery of the Tutelary Couple
headed finial and her consort turns toward that their following was a large one in the
her holding up a large kylix in his right lands to the south of the Hindu Kush in
hand. The motives of the small child cling- the era of Kushan domination. Since this
ing to the woman's knee, the demonic fig- region included a mixed population with
ures pouring out the contents of large vases the elements of Indian, Iranian, and even
beneath the feet of the couple, and the Greek cultural inheritance, it would not
small bearded genius who peers over the seem too unusual to find the Tutelary Cou-
back of the throne with a full money-bag ple in a number of differing guises, depend-
in his hand may all be related to the gener- ing on the time and/or place they were
al scheme of the imagery of Paincika and created. If a Graeco-Iranian, or perhaps
Haritl." Bachhofer has observed, however, more precisely Dynastic Kushan influence,
that the clothing and attributes of pairs is to be held responsible for transforming
such as these are derived from the images the usual Pafncika and Hariti into the
of PHARRO and ARDOXSHO on Kus- equivalent of PHARRO and ARDOX-
han coins; but he has perhaps gone too far SHO, something of the same hybridiza-
in asserting that these deities were meant tion must have produced the extraordinary
to be an Iranian replacement for the more representation on the medallion of a silver
familiar Indo-Kushan Tutelary Couple.62 bowl found near Tank in the Punjab (fig.
It seems apparent from the many charac- I3). Here, surrounded by an undulating
teristics that they shared with Paincika and vine motive, a pot-bellied, mustachioed,
Hariti that they were identical in the func- nude male sits drinking from a rhyton with
tions of bestowing wealth and progeny to an animal-headed spout.63 He wears vine-
their Gandharan devotees. leaves in his hair, a thin drape over his
61 Hariti, in the more usual version of the PHARRO and ARDOXSHO to be an Iranian
Tutelary Couple, is frequently shown with nu- reaction against Indian influence, but this does
merous infants. The Shah-ji-ki-Dheri group in the not seem probable. There is too much syncretism
Peshawar Museum has the identical motive of the of imagery, and both share too many attributes to
child clinging to her right knee (Ingholt, p. I47, be entirely separate entities. Rosenfield notes the
no. 344). The theme of the half-figures pouring appearance of a figure resembling PHARRO in
out the contents of vases is more complex. In a the place of Kubera-Vais'ravana as chief of the
version of the Tutelary Couple from Jamalgarhi, Four Guardian Kings, in a scene of the donation
in the Peshawar Museum, these vessels are money of the four bowls to the Buddha (p. 247, fig. 83).
bags streaming coins (Ibid., p. I47, no. 343). But, 63 0. M. Dalton, Treasure of the Oxus, Bri-
in another representation from Sahri-Balhol, of tish Museum, 2nd ed., I926, pp. 5 8-59, no. 204,
the PHARRO and ARDOXSHO type, the mo- and pl. XXXIII. Dalton first suggested an iden-
tive has become a stylized pattern of two vases tification of the main figure as Kubera cf. ibid.,
lying on their sides, exuding a design that is more pp. 5 I-52, no. I98, and pl.XXVIII. This is a sil-
vegetal than coin-shaped (Ibid., pp. I47-148, no. ver roundel showing a seated goddess on a high-
345). backed throne decorated with a running vine mo-
62 See L. Bachhofer, Pancika und Hirit - tive. She holds a bunch of grapes in her right hand
Pharo und Ardoxsho, Ostasiatische Zeitschrift, to a small adorant with a bowl. The goddess is
n. f. I3, I937, pp. 6-i5. Bachhofer believes most likely an Hariti-ARDOXSHO type. AR-
thighs, and boots with turned-up toes. In and corresponds most closely with Kubera.
his left hand he clutches the neck of a full It is a work which appears to have been
wineskin. A smaller seated female on his created out of a series of iconographic and
right is dressed in a long skirt, a shawl stylistic amalgamations that preceded it
fastened with a brooch at the neck, and a and thus to have been produced in a very
diaphanous upper garment. She carries a late era of Kushan influence. One signifi-
footed goblet in her right hand and a cant piece of evidence that seems to cor-
wreath or diadem in her left. This wreath roborate this view is a large square clay
is very close to one held by a royal per- tablet seal modelled on both faces, from
sonage in a festal scene engraved on a sil- Taxila." The obverse shows a garuda, or
ver plate of Sasanian type in the Walters possibly a cock with a lotus stalk in its
Art Gallery;64 and the undulating channels beak, trampling a snake, represented above
which radiate from the edge of the medal- a Brahmi inscription of Gupta character,
lion to the rim of the bowl are almost iden- belonging, according to Marshall, to the
tical to those found on another Sasanian fifth century A.D. On the reverse (fig. I4),
silver dish in a private collection in Tehe- is a seated figure with legs spread apart,
ran.65 Although we cannot believe that the wearing a fillet with long tails and a thin
Tank bowl was the product of a Sasanian drape over the thighs, and holding aloft in
atelier, it does bear the mark of a tradition his right hand a horn-shaped object. This
contemporary with cultures within the Sa- led Marshall to identify him as a wind god
sanian orbit which display elements of a blowing a horn. Some sort of foliage and
dionysiac symbolism in silverwork deco- a small attendant bearing indistinguishable
ration in many ways parallel to that found objects appear on his left, and on the op-
in Gandhara. posite side are two dwarf-like figures, one
The portly vine-wreathed wine drinker of whom holds a long-necked vase. Com-
of the Tank Bowl belongs most obviously parisons between the so-called "wind god"
to the Kushan dionysiac Yaksha tradition and the deity of the Tank bowl are una-
DOXSHO is commonly seen seated on a high- as its provenance, which could be from Central
backed throne on later Kushan coinage (see V. Asia rather than Iran. Some of the Chionite coin
Smith, Catalogue of the Coins in the Indian Mu- types from the group to the north of the Hindu
seum, Calcutta, Oxford, I906, vol. i, pl. XIII, Kush show royal profiles having a crown with
no. ii, pl. XIV nos. 2, 5, and 6; Foucher, vol. 2, a peculiar lobe-shaped korymbos-device, similar
pl. V, no. 2o; A.Cunningham, Later Indo-Scy- to that on the crown of the royal figure on the
thians, Numismatic Chronicle, I893, pl. IX). The Walters Art Gallery plate (cf. R. Ghirshman, Les
grape cluster held by the goddess may be related Chionites-Hephtalites, MDAFA, vol. I3, I948,
to that of the Shah-ji-ki-Dherf Hariti (Ingholt, pp. 9-IO, figs. 5-6).
p. 25, Pl. II 3). 65 Sept mille ans d'art en Iran, exhibition
64 F. Sarre, Die kunst des alten Persien, Ber- catalogue, Paris, I96I, no. 82I. The central me-
lin, I922, p. 65, pl. 3; K. Erdmann, Die kunst dallion has a monogram in the form of a trident.
Irans zur zeit der Sasaniden, Berlin, I943, p. 98, The bowl was supposedly found in Deilaman.
fig. 69. This plate, unlike those of the more usual 66 Marshall, Taxila, vol. 2, p. 682, no. 38,
applied-relief or repousse techniques of Sasanian vol. 3, pl. 208, no. 59 a,b. Marshall renders the
silverwork, is engraved. Its date is as problematic inscription: "of Harischanda."
77 Panini, Ashtadhya-yi iv. 2. 99. Cited by 0. dad (i. 8). There is no reason why a region or set-
Prakash in Food and Drinks in Ancient India, tlement on the Kabul could not also have been
New Delhi, 9g6i, p. 44. given the Iranian name Nisaya or Nysa during
78 Ibid., v. 4. 3; Prakash, loc. cit. the Achaemenid era. The Mt. Meros of Alexander,
79 Kautilya, Arthasastra ii. 25.25; Prakash, however, has been equated with the triple-peaked
p. 96, cf. pp. 94-9 5. Mt. Koh-i-Mor in Swat (Cambridge History of
80 Hegesander in Fragmenta historicorum India, vol. I, pp. 3 53-3 54). This presents certain
graecorum, ed. T. Muller, Paris, I878-85, frag. 43, geographical problems, since Nysa was supposedly
iv, p. 42I. located at its foot. A. K. Narain supposes that
Greeks, like the Branchidae, may have settled
81 Arrian Indica i. i-8; Arrian Anabasis v. I;
Nysa during Achaemenid times, but this cannot
Diodorus Siculus Bibliothekis I .38.4; Q. Curtius
Rufus De rebus gestis Alexandri Magni viii. io. be proven (7he Indo-Greeks, Oxford, I957, pp. 2
-5). Arrian mentions that the Nysaeans were
82 Anabasis v. i. 6., V. 2. 5-7; Indica i. 6. The
shorter and fairer than the Indians, more like the
Nysa found by Alexander is likely the NayaQa Greeks, themselves (Indica I. 24). This could have
Alovvao;rctg of Ptolemy (Geography vii.1.43), been due to a strong admixture of non-Indian ele-
which could only be Nagarahara in the Jelalabad ments in the population.
district; cf. A. Cunningham, Ancient Geography 83 Ivy grew wild on Mt. Meros, as did the
of India, new ed., Varanasi, I963, p. 39. Nysa, vine, but because of heavy rains, the grape clusters
outside its mythological associations with Dio- tended to fall before ripening (Strabo, Geography,
nysos in several different locations, is an old Ira- xv. I,8). See also Pliny, Historia Vi. 22.23. Ac-
nian place name. According to the great Darius cording to Julius Solinus, there was a cave on Mt.
inscription, Nisaya was district in Media (see F. Meros where Dionysos was nourished (Collectanea
W. K6nig, Relief und inschrift des koenigs Dareios 52. I7). Polyaenos tells us that the mountain had
I am felsen von Bagistan, Leiden, 193 8, p. 39 [ I 3], three peaks, one called Meros, the other two,
p. 69). Another Nisaya is mentioned in the Vendi- Kondraske and Korasibie (Stratigica i. 1.2).
Actually, this appellation may be a Greek were Muziris, Nelcynda, Bacare, and Bar-
corruption of its true name, Mt. Meru, the baricum, the port of Minnagara on the In-
fabulous Indian World Mountain, by which dus Delta.
it was known to the local populace. On its Although viticulture is probably less
slopes grew the laurel, ivy, and grapevine extensive in modern times, botanical sur-
so familiar to the homesick Greeks who veys of the last century have demonstrated
were allowed to linger there to attend bac- that the grape still grows in the northwest
chanalian celebrations.84 We shall return to hill country, particularly around Jelala-
the Indian Dionysos presently; suffice to bad, Peshawar, and in the Punjab.87 The
say that classical evidence strongly infers variety abundant around Peshawar is the
that Alexander's armies found the vine al- vitis parvifolia, or Himalayan wild grape,
ready flourishing when they descended in- which has small leaves and small berries of
to northwest India. This area of viticul- a sweet delicate flavor and thrives in a
ture to the south of the Hindu Kush was wild or semi-cultivated state.88 It is not
probably part of a much larger complex of impossible that this was the variety of
ancient vine-growing areas in Central Asia. wild grape discovered by the Greeks on
The first accurate report of these was made Mt. Meros.
by the Han emissary Chang-Ch'ien (ca. Since local traditions of Yaksha-lore
I30-I25 B.C.) who found the new and un-in India have their origins in the most re-
familiar fruit in Ta-yuan (Ferghana) and mote antiquity of popular culture, we may
among the An-hsi (Parthians).85 suppose that the Yakshas were not un-
We may assume that the Yiueh-chih hadknown in the northwest prior to the ar-
already become acquainted with grapes rival of the Kushans or perhaps even be-
and wine in Ferghana or Bactria before the fore any significant missionary activity of
establishment of the Kushan kingdom. Sub-Buddhism in the region. With this in mind,
sequently, they probably not only fostered the question inevitably arises as to whether
vine cultivation in their realms but also the Yaksha-cult of this grape growing area
exported grapes and wine to the vineless became associated with the vine during the
areas of India. The demand for wine must Kushan era or whether this had not taken
certainly have been great, since the Peri- place previously.
plus of the Erythraean Sea records imports One of the railing pillars of the Bhar-
of Italian, Laodician, and Arabian vintages hut Stupa bears the image of a standing
at Barygaza.86 Other wine-importing ports warrior (fig. i6) holding in his hand what
84 The vine flourished in the territory of the Sino-Iranica, Field Museum Anthropological Se-
Oxydrakai (Strabo, Geography, v. 8) and in the ries, vol. iS, no. 3, Chicago, I919, P. 223, pp.23I-
country of the Mousikanos (Ibid., V. 22. I). 233.
85 B. Watson, Records of the Grand Historian 86 Periplus of the Erythraean Sea, trans. W.
of China, translated from the Shih-chi of Ssu-ma- H. Schoff, NewYork, 19I2, p.42, no.49, p.77,
ch'ien, NewYork, I96I, vol. 2, pp. 266-269, pp. PP 44-45, nos. 53-56.
279-280. The inhabitants of Ta-yuan stored vast 87 For references see G. Watt, A Dictionary
amounts of wine. Strabo relates that Margiana, of the Economic Products of India, London, I 893,
Hyrcania, and Ariana produced grapes of pheno- vol. II, pt. IV, pp. 270-27I.
menal size (Geography, ii.I .I 4); cf. B. Laufer, 88 Ibid., p. 360.
appears to be a tiny vine-sprig and grape specific suggestions have been made by
cluster, not unlike the botanical description Majumdar, who is undecided about the
of the Himalayan wild grape.89 Unlike the Warrior's identity but notes that the vine-
other railing pillars on which Kubera, sprig relates the image to the northwest,93
Yakshas, Yakshis, and related beings are and by Prakash, who surmises that it might
depicted as recognizable Indian types, the be an Indo-Greek king.94 One can hardly
Bharhut warrior is unusual. He wears a imagine why an Indo-Greek king should
long sleeved tunic tied in front with cords be found in the midst of Yaksha-types as a
and reaching to mid-thigh, a robe or dhoti stupa guardian, but this theory may not be
falling in swallow-tail folds to the knee, too far from correct.
high boots, and a sheathed sword hanging The Warrior's boots are characteristi-
from his left shoulder by a strap. His head cally non-Indian as is his sleeved jacket.
is uncovered, displaying short-cropped Such jackets or tunics are frequently worn
curly hair bound by a ribbon tied at the by the "foreigners" depicted at Sainchi95
back with two long ends floating out be- and may be associated with generally Ira-
hind. R.P.Chanda once suggested that this nian modes of costume. The particular cut
strangely attired figure might represent of the jacket, with sleeves and ties to fasten
Vepacitta, the chief of the Asuras, mention- it in front, are similar to a garment repre-
ed in the Samyutta-nikaya (I, 223-226) sented on the stone image of a Parthian
as wearing boots and carrying a sword.90 nobleman found in Iran and tentatively
Barua thinks that it might be the solar dated to the second century B.C.96 The
deity Mihira and associates it with the Ma- sword, which is long and broad and fitted
hila, the name of the monk who is inscrib- into a scabbard with crossed thongs and a
ed as dedicator of the pillar.9' Coomaras- nandipada pin, is probably of the manda-
wamy calls the Warrior either Vepacitta lagra type known in Kautilya's time97 and
(Virocana) or Sambara, the Asura chief as the same as that described by Arrian as a
a solar divinity.92 On the other hand, less sword of three cubits in length which the
89 Cunningham, Bharhut, pp. 32-3 3, p1. tunic boots and short hair on a winged lion); ibid.,
XXXII, fig. i; Coomaraswamy, La sculpture de vol. 2, pl. 36 cl (inner face of west pillar of North-
Bharhut, p. 62, pl. XVII, fig. 43. ern Gateway of Stiupa I showing foreign musicians
90 B. Barua, Barhut, Calcutta, 1934, vOl. 2, wearing sleeved tunics, sandals, cloaks fastened
p.69. at the neck, and on their heads, round or pointed
91 Ibid., vol. 2, pp. 68-70. caps, or fillets).
92 Coomaraswamy, loc. cit. 96 R. Ghirshman, Iran: Parthians and Sasa-
93 N. G. Majumdar, A Guide to the Sculpture nians, trans. S. Gilbert, J. Emmons, London, I962,
in the Indian Museum, Delhi, I937, pt. I, pp. 24- p. 27, fig. 36. The long-sleeved jacket has several
25. ties in front. The hair is treated in typical Par-
94 Prakash, p. I49. thian style, bound by a fillet, but with long side-
95 See San-chi, vol. 2, pl. 24, 3 (false capital on
locks covering the ears, unlike the Bharhut War-
front of east end of Northern Gateway of Stiiparior I whose hair is uniformly short in the Greek
showing riders wearing sleeved tunics mounted on manner.
winged lions); ibid., vol. 2, pl. 62, 4 (north end of 97 Cited by M. K. Dhavalikar in San-chi, a
Western Gateway of Stiipa I showing a rider with Cultural Study, Poona, I965, p. 29, pl. 62,2.
Indian warriors wielded with both hands nificance. In this instance, it would appear
in close combat.98 The Bharhut Warrior's that the sculptor has shown us two cultur-
headband and uncovered close-cropped ally and geographically separate breeds of
hair are clearly exotic accretions, and seen Yaksha: one from the northwest vine
together, they most closely approximate country and the other an indigenous Indian
Greek fashions. The ribbon with long tails type.
bare feet and chest adorned with heavy to India and discovered there a rustic open-
necklaces. Hanging from a mango tree on air shrine encircled with a thick planting
his right is a long sword in a scabbard of trees and vines to form a natural roof or
bound with crossed thongs and fastened arbor. Inside the sacred area he saw vats,
with a nandipada pin. This figure was baskets, and implements of viticulture of
identified by Marshall and Foucher as an gold and silver and a white stone image of
anonymous Yaksha-senzpati, but Foucher Dionysos in Indian guise.104 It is not be-
went so far as to suggest that it might re- yond the realm of possibility that Philos-
present Pancika.102 The Sa-nchi senapati is tratus' description is more or less accurate
basically Indian in conception, without the (although the accoutrements of the shrine
unusual features of the Bharhut Warrior, were perhaps not so splendid) and that it
but his very presence and position on the was a well-known place of worship in the
Safnchi Gateway lend authority to an iden- surrounding region. Since Yakshas, as we
tification of the Bharhut images as that of have seen, were linked with the vine in this
a proto-Paincika. area, the sanctuary could have belonged to
It seems clear that the Yakshas of the an important Yaksha whose image Apollo-
Kushan northwest had intimate associa- nius took for Dionysos. The description is
tions with the vine and viticulture and that not much different, in fact, from those of
these connections were recognized prior to early Yaksha shrines in Indian literature
the Kushan era, if we consider the evidence since they could be, and usually were, in
from Bharhut and Sa-nchi. A broad inves- the open air, in groves or on mountains,
tigation into the antiquity of the Yakshas within some sort of enclosure surrounding
in this region is not possible here, but we a tree or image of the deity.'05 Moreover,
should not overlook the fact that Alexan- the whole spirit of bhakti worship within
der's armies were said to have discovered theYaksha cult-the unrestrained personal
the worship of Dionysos and his thiasos to devotion of the adorants with music, danc-
the south of the Hindu Kush. Megasthenes ing, pageantry, and the annointment and
states that the Indians of the mountains garlanding of the image-all these elements
worshipped Dionysos,103 and, according to of Indian popular religion had much in
Philostratus, Apollonius of Tyana climbed common with the cult of Dionysos.,' If the
the god's sacred mountain during his visit grapevine had been given a place of some
popular conception of the creation of the quor, but it is difficult to see why this pro-
world from the Primal Waters. From this pensity alone would have caused the at-
is derived the concept of a Primal Spirit, tribute to be so commonly repeated. The
present in or upon the Waters, out of most reasonable assumption, in light of
whom all life is engendered, seen as a greatCoomaraswamy's characterization of the
Yaksha, Varuna, or Vishnu.1"0 Although Yakshas, is that these vessels were meant
there are reasonable objections to links be- as containers of the rasa which they pro-
tween a vague conception having its origin tected, and from which their powers as
in the Vedic age and the imagery of the Lords of Life were derived. Although the
so-called Plant Style at Bharhut, Cooma- Yaksha cult was never connected with the
raswamy argues that such motives were Brahmanical Soma of the Devas, it is in-
products of a very old, but unknown, icon- deed possible that, to the pious devotees of
ographic tradition."' their cult, sura or wine was seen not simply
The Yakshas of popular ancient Indian as an intoxicant but as an amrita substance.
folk religion, according to Coomaraswa- If this is true, there is a much greater in-
my, became the guardians and bearers of trinsic similarity of meaning between the
the fertilizing essence, the rasa necessary symbolism of the Hellenic Dionysos and
for birth and regeneration, which was ulti- that of the Kushan Yakshas than has for-
mately the same as the heavenly amrita, or merly been acknowledged. The grapevine,
Soma. In the Vedas and Brahmanas the like the lotus vine, is a true arbor vitae in
deities who fulfill this function in respectKushan imagery, and the flask or vessel of
wine may be the vas vitae, conceptually
to Soma were the Gandharvas and Apsara-
ses, who are considered to have their abode akin to the kantharos of Dionysos.
in trees.1"2 It seems probable, as Coomaras- Stacy may have been not altogether
wamy has suggested, that the original na- wrong in suggesting that the Silenus block
ture of the Gandharvas and Apsarases was originally supported a vessel for wine of-
transmitted to the Yakshas who had be- ferings, even if it has since been demon-
come the popular deities of fertility.1"3 strated that it was probably used within a
Kushan Yaksha images and those of Buddhist establishment. The use of wine
Nagas often carry the attribute of the offerings to Kubera or other important
flask, goblet, or drinking vessel of some Yakshas would only have been a contin-
type, which, as we have seen, also occurs uation of cult practices under the aegis of
in Indian art prior to the Kushan era. Al- Buddhism, at a time when the cult of the
though there appears to be no standardiza- Yakshas in the northwest had not been
tion of these vessel types, it seems apparent fully assimilated within the framework of
that the attribute had a universally similar Buddhist orthodoxy. It is probable, how-
meaning. Yakshas and Nagas were believ- ever, that later during the Kushan era the
ed to be great imbibers of intoxicating li- practice was discontinued. There are, of
110 See Coomaraswamy, Yaksas, pt. II, pp. 112 Ibid., pt. II, P. 33 (with numerous refe-
25-26, p. 29, p. 35 rences).
1"I Ibid., pt. II, p. I7. 113 Ibid., pt. II, P. 34.
course, a number of reported instances of the amrita kalasa, and not merely as an
the habitual offering of different types of iconographic allusion to the Yakshas' fa-
food to tutelary Yakshas or Nagas within vorite beverage, a very probable relation-
Buddhist monasteries; so this, in itself, is ship exists between this attribute and the
not unusual.1"4 A late Chinese source, ac- amrita kalasa of the bodhisattvas."18 In
cording to Peri, mentions outdoor altars Buddhist iconography there is, however,
for Yaksha offerings made of stone in the some confusion about the name and func-
form of an open lotus and having smooth tion of this vase, since it is often called a
flat tops to serve as tables."t5 The Mathuran kamandalu, or monastic water vessel. Ac-
stone vases are obviously hollow, not flat tually, the shape of both the amrita kalasa
topped, but both are decorated with the and the water pot are identical in basic
open lotus motive. An additional bit of in- shape, having an ovoid body, with or with-
formation from Coomaraswamy, offered out a case, a long neck, and a flared rim.
to him by Sir Charles Elliot, is that in Jap- The usual kamandalu, however, has an ad-
anese Buddhist temples where Ganesha is ditional spout on one side for the purpose
worshipped, the offerings include sake, al- of adding water to the vessel.1"9 During the
though, as a general rule, alcohol is forbid-
Kushan era this form does not appear as a
den in such places."6 Since this benevolent
bodhisattva attribute, and we may indeed
elephant-headed deity has Yaksha connec-
wonder whether the flask was ever in-
tions, this factor seems, to Coomaraswamy
tended specifically as such. In this regard
to justify the offering of such liquor."t7 It
Marie-Therese de Mallmann, in her study
may well be that this is a modern survival
of Avalokitesvara, has justifiably observ-
of heterodox practices followed by pious
ed: "Dans l'art Kush'ana de Mathur'a-ou
Buddhists in the early years of Kushan rule
le col du vas se distingue nettement de la
at Mathura.
panse, oui la bordure de l'orifice est retour-
If we may regard the vessels and flasks
nee, et ou le goulot n'est pas pointu-il ne
of Yaksha and Naga images as a form of
s'agirait pas du kamandalu, mais du vase-
a-nectar-d'immortalite, amrita-kalasa, em-
114 Bali offerings were placed before icons of
Hariti and her hungry brood each day in the re-
fectories of monasteries. See N. Peri, Hariti, la
118 The development of the Buddha and
mere-de-demons, BEFEO, vol. I7, I917, pp. II-
bodhisattva image in the Kushan period is a sub-
I 2 (from the Samyuktavastu chap. XXXI); I-tsing,
ject of the utmost complexity which cannot be
a Record of the Buddhist Religion, trans. J. Taka-
kusu, Oxford, I896, pp. 37-38. I-tsing also men-
dealt with here. The Mathuran Yaksha or Naga
tions similar offerings before images of Mahakala flask, however, is so close to that of Mathuran
(Kubera) either in front of the porch or beside a bodhisattvas that the meaning of the attribute
pillard in the kitchen of the monastery. must be essentially similar; cf. A. Coomaraswamy,
115 Peri, BEFEO, I917, pp. 55-56. The Origin of the Buddha Image, Art Bulletin,
116 Coomaraswamy, Yaksas, pt. II, p.4. vol. 9, no. 4, I927, pp. 303-305, figs. 48-5o.
117 Cf. A. Getty, Ganesa, Oxford, I936, p. I2, 119 This is, of course, the fully developed
p. I 8. According to the Mahanirvaina-tant0a, Ga- Buddhist kamandalu. It may actually have evolv-
nesha is offered meat, fish, and wine. His images ed from a primal kalas'a form, in which case the
may show him with a wine jar in his trunk. confusion would be one of terminology.
Although the grapevine and dionysiac of Light, since they are shown together as
motives related to theYakshas disappeared an offering in a fragmentary illustration of
in northwest India after the fifth century, what is thought to be a Manichaean Bema
numerous silver vessels of Iranian or more festival.130 A Manichaean painting from
probably Central Asian manufacture, gen- B'az'aklik shows a fantastic tree with a tri-
erally termed late-Sasanian, display the ple trunk growing from a large basin, with
vine scroll or vine tree together with un- large grape clusters hanging from its foli-
usual variations on dionysiac themes.128 age, which must be a Tree of Life.13"
None of these have Buddhist connections, In T'ang China, where the art of wine-
but we may surmise that there may have making had been introduced from Central
been some influence upon their imagery, Asia during the seventh century, the aus-
either directly or indirectly, from Kushan picious vine is commonly found on Lion-
tradition. The running vine motive is found and-Grape mirrors."32 Within Central
in the architectural decoration at Pyandji- Asian Buddhism, however, there is little
kent in Sogdiana as late as the seventh cen- evidence for the continuity of the earlier
tury."' Grapes and vine tree motives also dionysiac themes of the Kushan era, except
appear in Manichaean manuscript illustra- for the notable inclusion of the grape clus-
tions from Central Asia, and grapes, like ter as an attribute of Avalokitesvara at
melons, were probably considered a Fruit Tun-huang.133
relatively short period of time which was certain- of scribes under trees with hanging grape clusters).
ly not enough to obliterate the Indian image of See also G. Widengren, Mani and Manichaeism,
the Kushan lord as Kubera-Vaisravana (W. Spink, London, I 96 I, p. I 5.
Ajanta and Ghatotkacha: a Preliminary Analysis, 131 A. Griinwedel, Alt-Kutscha, Berlin, 1920,
Ars Orientalis, vol. 6, I966, pp. I42 f., pl. I). p. 176, fig. 66. J. Hackin, Recherches archeolo-
128 J. J. Smirnov, Vostochnoe Cerebro, St. giques en Asie Centrale, I93I, Paris, I936, pp. I9
Petersburg, I909. See pl. XXXVII, 66, pl. XLIV, -21, pl. I, pl. XII, pl. XIII, a and b.
77, pl. XLV, 78, pl. LII, 86, pl. LXV, I09. See 132 S. Cammann, The Lion-and-Grape Pat-
especially pl. LXV, II0, and pl. LXVI, II 3, (the terns on Chinese Bronze Mirrors, Artibus Asiae,
flanges on top of the handles of both vessels show vol. i6, 1953, pp. 265-29i. Cammann sees Ma-
a bearded silenus bust with cup or rhyton, not un- nichaean influence in the mirror motives. Wine
like the representation on the medallion of the making was introduced to China c. 64o A. D. from
amphora from Khotan). Turkestan; cf. B. Laufer, p. 232.
129 A. Belenitski, Skuptura e szevopece dryev- 133 See A. Waley, A Catalogue of Paintings
nevo Pyandshekenta, Moscow, I959, pp. 121-I25, recovered from Tun-huang by Sir Aurel Stein,
figs. 20, 21, 22, and 24. London, 193 1, pp 54-59, no. XXXV; A. Stein,
130 A. von Le Coq, Buddhistische Spatantike, Serindia, Oxford, I92I, vol. 4, pl. LXIII; Old
vol. 2, Die manichaeischen miniaturen, Berlin, Chinese Art, ed. T. Misugi, Osaka, i961, no. 63
I923, pl. 85, a (a fragmentary illustration of a (a silk painting from Tun-huang of a standing
ceremony in which a bowl of melons and grapes thousand-armed Avalokitesvara in the Hakutsura
appears as an offering); pl. 85, b (an illustration Museum, Kobe).
,A,*-I _i
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i_
g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -5_. MAU Us. -:S
'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~A. ..... f
/ XS f !: '~406
_ | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~l b-I
I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ l--
z. i .f.j ...
00 ||_ l*||
l I | I | 1 I I | | _ I
| l W _ _ l I I | * _ I | l l - _ _~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~VWJ
................~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.
FIG. 4. -DIONYSIAC SCENE. LAHORE MUSEUM. Courtesy Islay Lyons and Harold Ingholt.
Taken from Gandharan Art in Pakistan, no. 397.
i0 3t D ->i
.. .
Si :I%F -|-.. .LN. .<.,. ,.*...i ..... .. ... ...:..S. .t.i. .'S. <. .-.,.-.L.;.R. .".':. ... .. ..... ..... .. ..... ..... .. ..... ..... .. .... ,. ..>._g. . ..sE. .5i.l ._.... ..... .. ..... ..... .. ..... ..... .. ..... ..... .. .RiA_D li;
g r C 1 SZ
_C _l EN, i; Z!! t 45_ j.,
;;sz8_ _____
sY , -2X''.jffl,'1,i-2'
.
vItU-= r , cl' i'1EdN' ! s
{l" a E 0
_t _ __ _
j ^is::#W.
FIG. 6. BACCHANALIAN SCENE ON STATUE BASE Lahore Museum
ttAF:
dBiL
_^4X;....
__ b *..
._=_!_ _6 i:'..N
_'s. _a;:;.
: _
i' ^.
F: tlL_
_5
- _I ,3E
? ] 1 . . . . .
I . i w q>f! . . . . . . Li b / _-
--_
_I__
__
SX S . - I . S N ; ^ lL
$i..- ___>
0 | R | ,,.
_jUs;
__0P 2 '; et
_fi'! jsF
..
'_
:
?' I ,1 s
a' i
* r l = ,?:.
111i , 11|i_
FIG. 7.-TRIANGULAR RELIEF WITH ICHTHYOCENTAUR COUPLE. Lahore Museum. Photo courtesy of John Rosenfield.
_s _ . [ w-~~~~~AM-
A, s ..
'q1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~P
FIG. 14.-CLAY SEAL FRom TAXILA. Photo FIG. 15.-RELIEF OF DIONYSIAc FIGURE FROM FIG. 16
taken from J. Marshall, Taxila, Vol. 3, NAGARJUNAKONDpA. Photo from MASI, no. 54, FRom
p1. 208-59 b. A. H., Lonehurst, The Buddhist Antiquities Museum,
of Niigarjunakonda, pl. X, d. from