Professional Documents
Culture Documents
De CLJ July Aug 2024 Ans. Key
De CLJ July Aug 2024 Ans. Key
Instructions: Read carefully. Choose the best answer for each question. Shade the correct letter in the separate
shading sheet provided. Do not forget to write your name and the subject of your test questionnaire in your shading
sheet.
1. Jin Woo, a foreigner residing in Hong Kong d. Ramon may plead commission of only Discharge of
counterfeits a fifty-peso bill issued by the Philippine Firearm as he had no intent to kill Rigor when he fired
Government. May Jin Woo be prosecuted before a civil his gun.
court in the Philippines?
a. No. The provisions of the Revised Penal Code are
enforceable only within the Philippine archipelago. 5. Bong detested Tanggol, his roommate, because
Tanggol was courting Bubbles, whom Bong fancied.
b. No. The Philippine Criminal Law is binding only on
One day, Bong decided to teach Tanggol a lesson and
persons who reside or sojourn in the Philippines.
c. No. Foreigners residing outside the jurisdiction of the went to a veterinarian (Vet) to ask for poison on the
Philippines are exempted from the operation of the pretext that he was going to kill a sick pet, when
actually Bong was intending to poison Tanggol. The
Philippine Criminal Law.
d. Yes. The provisions of the Revised Penal Code Vet instantly gave Bong a non-toxic solution which,
are enforceable also outside the jurisdiction of when mixed with Tanggol's food, did not kill the same.
Is Bong criminally liable?
the Philippines against those who should forge
or counterfeit currency notes of the Philippines a. Yes, because Puti committed attempted murder.
or obligations and securities issued by the b. No, because Pula did not die.
c. Yes, because Puti committed an impossible
Government of the Philippines.
crime.
d. No, because Pula did not actually ingest poison.
2. Cesare Montano is a French diplomat stationed in
the Philippines. While on EDSA and driving with an
expired license, he hit a pedestrian who was crossing 6. Alberto inflicted serious injuries on Monique.
illegally. The pedestrian died. Pierce was charged with Because of delay in providing medical treatment to
Monique, she died. Is Alberto criminally liable for the
reckless imprudence resulting in homicide. In his
defense, he claimed diplomatic immunity. Is Pierce death of Monique?
correct? a. Yes, because the delay did not break the
causal connection between Alberto's felonies
a. Yes, because he hit a pedestrian crossing illegally.
b. No, because he is driving with an expired license. act and the injuries sustained by Monique.
COL b. Yes because any intervening cause between the
infliction of injury and death is immaterial.
c. Yes, because he is diplomat stationed in the
c. No because the infliction of injury was not the
Philippines.
d. No, because he killed a person. immediate cause of death.
d. No because the delay in the administration of the
medical treatment was an intervening cause.
3. It pertains to a matter of judicial knowledge that
certain individuals will kill others or commit serious
7. Can there be a frustrated impossible crime?
offenses for no reason at all. For this reason,
a. Lack of motive can result in conviction where a. Yes. When the crime is not produced by reason of
the crime and the accuser's part in it are shown. the inherent impossibility of its accomplishment, it is a
frustrated impossible crime.
b. Motive is material only where there is no evidence
of criminal intent. b. No. there can be no frustrated impossible
c. Lack of motive precludes conviction. crime because the means employed to
d. The motive of an offender is absolutely immaterial. accomplish the crime is inadequate or
ineffectual.
4. Ramon, without intent to kill, aimed his gun at Rigor c. Yes, there can be frustrated impossible crime when
and fired it, hitting the latter who died as a the act performed would be an offense against
consequence. Under the circumstances persons.
a. Ramon cannot plead praeter intentionem d. No. there can be no frustrated impossible crime
since the intent to kill is presumed from the because the offender has already performed acts for
killing of the victim. the execution of the crime.
b. Ramon may plead praeter intentionem since he
intended only to scare, not to kill Rigor.
8. Kidlat, Bagyo, and Edwin agreed to rob a house of
c. Ramon may plead aberratio ictus as he had no
intention to hit Rigor. its cash. After they took the cash, Kidlat and Bagyo
decided to set the house on fire to destroy any
33. When a person is lawfully arrested without a 38. The judge must, before issuing the warrant,
warrant involving an offense which requires a personally examine in the form of in writing and under
77. Which of the following are the elements of 83. The PHASE in the commission of the crime when
abandoning a minor? the person is from the point of beginning or within the
I. That the offender has the custody of the child point where he can still decide to desist or continue the
II. That the child is under 7 years of age commission of the crime is the phase.
III. That he abandons such child a. objective
IV. That he has no intent to kill the child when the latter b. internal
is abandoned
c. subjective
d. external
a. I, II, III
b. I, III, IV
c. II, III, IV 84. A jail guard who is in custody of a prisoner would
d. I, II, III, IV be held liable for infidelity in the custody of prisoners
if he consented to the escape of a prisoner under his
78. The person is suspected of committing a crime charge. What if the guard involved is an off-duty guard
which is punishable by imprisonment of at least 4 from the BUCOR/BJMP/PNP and he took out a prisoner
years, 2 months and 1 day. The person was not subject from the place of confinement and replaced him with
to warrantless arrest. How will you proceed with the another? What was the crime committed by the guard?
case? a. delivering prisoners from jail
A. Report the matter to my superior and let them b. infidelity in the custody of prisoners still
decide what to do with the situation. c. bribery
B. Exert effort to arrest a person even without a d. corruption of public officer
warrant for the commission of a crimes
C. File a direct complaint with the prosecutor’s office 85. Celso was arrested without a warrant for the crime
for inquest proceedings. the penalty of which is imprisonment of at least 4
D. File a direct complaint with prosecutor’s years, 2 months and 1 day. He asked for preliminary
office for preliminary investigation investigation. What is required of the person arrested
in order that preliminary investigation may be
79. After the prosecution rested its case, the accused conducted?
filed a demurrer to evidence. Would double jeopardy a. He should ask for the presence of a counsel while
be a valid defense if he is charged again with the same being detained.
offense?
b. He should ask for his right to remain silent in the
A. Yes, because the dismissal is tantamount to
course of the preliminary investigation
acquittal.
B. Yes, the case was not terminated on its own merits. c. He should ask his right to be informed of the nature
C. No, because the dismissal is with his consent or of the cause and accusation against him.
upon his own motion. d. He should waive his right under Article 125 of
D. No, The case was not terminated on its merits hence the Revised Penal Code
double jeopardy is not a valid defense.
86. Santino is a police officer. He arrested Lawrence
80. Supposed that after conviction for the crime of without a warrant for a crime which is considered as
murder and while being escorted for transport to the less grave offense. For Santino to be Not liable for the
National Bilibid Prison, Kidlat escaped. After more than crime of arbitrary detention, he must deliver Lawrence
20 years, Pat. Mendoza chanced upon Kidlat and to proper judicial authorities within from the time of
arrested the latter so that he may serve his prison the arrest.
sentence for murder. Did the penalty for crime of
a. 12 hours
murder prescribed?
b. 18 hours
A. No, he was not yet committed to the National
Bilibid Prison c. 36 hours
B. Yes, because it has been more than 20 years already d. 32 hours
since his escape after his conviction.
C. None of these 87. Jet Lee is a Chinese citizen who killed a Filipino on
D. No, because his prescription of penalty for the crime board a Philippine commercial vessel on the high seas,
of murder is 30 years based on the given situation, based on territorially
principle, Philippine criminal law ls
81. The accused was present during arraignment and a. Not applicable because the crime was committed
he entered his plea. Despite notice and the issuance of outside of the Philippines territory
warrant for his arrest, the accused remains absent. b. Not applicable because the offender is not a Filipino
What should the court do in this kind of situation? c. Applicable in this situation although the crime
A. Proceed with the trial of the case dispensing the
was committed on the high seas.
presentation of evidence of the accused
d. Applicable even if the crime was committed by a
B. None of these
C. Not to proceed with the trial of the case because the Chinese.
accused has the right to confront the witnesses
D. Proceed with the trial of the case in absentia 88. Col Suarez, Pat. Salazar and Pat. Dimaguiba are
of the accused prison guards who escorted Edwin in attending a court
Amici Review Center 8|Page
hearing in Manila City. Arriving too early in the A. I will invoke the defense of lawful and
courtroom Pat. Salazar and Dimaguiba went to a insuperable cause
nearby restaurant to have coffee. When Edwin was B. None of these
being watched by Col. Suarez only. Edwin and his C. I will invoke the defense of performance of a lawful
cohorts succeeded in escaping. The said prison guards order
can be held liable for what crime? D. I will invoke the defense of lawful performance of
a. Conniving with prisoner
duty
b. Consenting to evasion
c. Illegal Break Time
d. Evasion through negligence 94. Statement made by a person while a startling
occurrence is taking place or immediately prior to
89. Suppose that Samantha is just an ordinary subsequent thereto with respect to the circumstances
embassy employee in Japan. She committed a crime in thereof, may be given in evidence as part of it and also
connection with the performance of her official function statements accompanying an equivocal act material to
the act complained of is not yet punishable at the time the issue, and giving it a legal significance, may be
it was committed. Under our penal system, the received as part of it.
applicable characteristics of criminal law are A. Dying Declaration
a. Territoriality B. Res Gestae
b. Internationality C. Hearsay
c. Prospectivity D. Verbal Acts
d. Generally
95. Pre-trial conference in criminal cases is mandatory.
90. Baby Giant is merely 6 years old. Which of the One of the matters that should be taken during the said
following statements BEST describes the qualification proceeding is stipulation and admission of facts. The
of Baby Giant as a witness? purpose of entering into a stipulation or admission of
A. He is qualified so long that he can express his facts is to what?
thought before the court A. Ensure justice and fair play
B. He is not qualified because a minor is susceptible of B. Making sure of facts
being coached by lawyers C. Expedite trial
C. He is qualified because he can perceive and D. corroborate either side party
perceiving can convey his perception to another
D. He is not qualified because he is still a minor 96. Marcelo went to the United States. While she was
there, encountered Olga an American. They eventually
91. A police officer entered the house of another. There got married. When Marcelo returned to the Philippines,
is a signage prohibiting anyone to enter without the his wife Marites filed an action against him for violating
permission of the owner. When can the police officer their marriage. What is Marcelo liable to?
be liable for violation of domicile?
a. Adultery
A. He will be liable only once the owner noticed his b. Bigamy
entry without consent. c. Concubinage
B. He will not be liable unless told to leave by the owner d. No Crime
of the house.
C. He will be liable unless the owner gives his consent 97. It is the rule which states that if the inculpatory
once discovered facts and circumstances are capable of two or more
D. The police officer will be liable the very interpretation, one which is consistent with the
moment of his/her entry innocence of the accused and the other consistent with
his guilt, or they are evenly balanced. The
92. Marsing entered the house of Don Julio since the constitutional presumption of innocence should tilt the
door is open. Marsing took the cellphone of Don Julio. scale in favor of the accused and he must be acquitted.
When Marsing was about to leave the house, Don Julio A. Equipoise rule
arrived and discovered that his cellphone has been b. Presumption of guilt
taken by Marsing. The latter brandished a knife against c. Hornbook doctrine
Don Julio and was able to speed away. Which is the d. due process of law
crime committed by A?
98. This is a remedy available to any person whose
A Theft right to life, liberty and security is violated or
B. Qualified theft threatened with violation by an unlawful act or
C Robbery with intimidation of person omission of a public official or employee, or of private
D. Robbery with violence against person individual or entity. It shall cover extralegal killings and
enforced disappearances:
93. A committed a grave offense, B arrested A without
a warrant. Due to the distance from the place of arrest a. Writ of Amparo
to the office of the Provincial Prosecutor, the b. Writ of Habeas Corpus
Information was filed more than three days after the c. Writ of Habeas Data
arrest. A remained under the custody of the police. d. Writ of Kalikasan
Suppose that you are B and you are charged with
arbitrary detention under Article 125 of the Revised 99. He is the 9th Secretary General of United Nations.
Penal Code. How would you defend yourself? a. Antonio Gutierres
b. Peter Thompson
c. Ban-Ki-moon