Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2007SVPposter3 0
2007SVPposter3 0
net/publication/326354723
CITATION READS
1 2,168
1 author:
Jorge W. Moreno-Bernal
Universidad del Norte (Colombia)
41 PUBLICATIONS 254 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Jorge W. Moreno-Bernal on 12 July 2018.
ABSTRACT
Estimates of total length and body mass are made for the Miocene crocodiles Purussaurus and Gryposuchus. Most specimens are between 7 – 8 meters in length, and 1,7 – 2,7 metric tons. Maximum size estimates are for specimens around 10 meters
in length and 5 metric tons. Femurs in Purussaurus are proportionally bigger than those of Gryposuchus, which is perhaps related to more aquatic habits in the latter. Thermal inertia caused by big size should have affected thermoregulation patterns in
these organisms.
Keywords: Alligatoroidea, Body size, Crocodylia, Gavialoidea, Gryposuchus, Purussaurus, Thermoregulation.
Gigantism has evolved repeatedly in different crocodyliform lineages. This trend can be seen in the pholidosaur Most Purussaurus specimens were estimated at lengths between 7-8 meters, with body masses between 1.7-
Sarcosuchus imperator1, the Cretaceous basal alligatoroid Deinosuchus2, and the Miocene caiman Mourasuchus 2.7 metric tones. A P. brasiliensis specimen was estimated in a maximum of 10 meters and 5 tones.
amazonensis3. This work is intended to provide body length and mass estimates for the Tropical South American Gryposuchus length was between 7 and 10 meters, without accurate body mass estimates, due to the lack of
Miocene crocodiles Purussaurus (Alligatoroidea) and Gryposuchus (Gavialoidea). proper studies in longirostral forms such as Gavialis and Tomistoma. Purussaurus and Gryposuchus are
longer and heavier than the biggest extant Crocodylia (with reach maximum sizes of 6 meters and 1 ton), and
close to giant Cretaceous forms such as Deinosuchus or Sarcosuchus.
For specimens represented by femora, TL and BM were predicted from femoral length (FL) using regressions
for A. mississippiensis7. Among femoral dimensions, FL was used because it provided the best TL and BM
estimates for very large extinct Crocodyliformes7. Comparisons between skull-based and femur-based
estimates suggests that while in Purussaurus femur size, relative to body size, is as expected in crocodilians,
Gryposuchus has reduced femora, suggestive of more aquatic habits. Robustness of Purussaurus limbs can
be related to the foraging of big terrestrial prey on the shores of water bodies.
Figure 1. (A) Purussaurus specimens. From left to right P. neivensis DHL-45 (juvenile); P. neivensis UCPM 39704; P. neivensis UCPM
39657(estimated); P. brasiliensis UFAC 1403. (B) Gryposuchus specimens Escala = 1 metro
Size estimates were done from skull and femoral measurements, using regressions published for extant crocodile
species. Among 15 sources of regression models published for 9 species of extant crocodilians, TL estimates for
Alligator mississippiensis and Crocodylus porosus were chosen to estimate Purussaurus spp. total length4,5. These
models were used because of their robustness, big sample size and high correlation indexes. TL of Gryposuchus spp.
specimens was estimated using a less robust model based on Gavialis gangeticus1. Estimated total lengths were
used, in turn, to estimate body weights following the regressions published for A. mississippiensis and C. porosus5,6.
Dorsal Skull Length (DSL) data for Purussaurus and Gryposuchus specimens (Fig. 1) were measured or taken from
several references. For other specimens DSL was estimated from measured or published measurements (Table 1).
For some specimens dorsal skull length was estimated by comparison of published skull and mandible
measurements. The discussion of the results for these specimens necessarily assumes that skull and mandible
proportions are exactly the same, which could not necessarily be the case.
REFERENCES
(1) SERENO, P. C., H. C. E. LARSSON, et al. 2001 The Giant Crocodiliform Sarcosuchus from the Cretaceous of Africa. Science 294: 1516-1519 (2) SCHWIMMER, D. (2002). King of the Crocodilians: The Paleobiology of Deinosuchus. Indiana University Press. 220 p. (3) PRICE, L. I., 1964 Sobre o Cranio de um grande crocodilideo extinto do alto rio
Jurua, Estado do Acre. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 36:59-66 (4) WOODWARD, A. R. & H. J. WHITE., 1995 Maximum size of the Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) Journal of herpetology, 29(4):507-513. (5) WEBB, G. J. & MESSEL, H., 1978 Morphometric analysis of Crocodylus porosus from the North Coast of Arnhem Land, Northern
Australia Australian Journal of Zoology, 26:1-27 (6) CHABRECK, R. H. & JOANEN, T., 1979 Growth rates of American Alligators in Louisiana Herpetologica, 35(1):51-57 (7) FARLOW, J. O., G. R. HURLBURT, et al. 2005. Femoral Dimensions and Body size of Alligator Mississippiensis: Estimating the size of extinct Mesoeucrocodylians. Journal of
Vertebrate Paleontology 25(No. 2): 354-369. (8) COLBERT, E., H., COWLES, R. B., & C. M. BOGERT, 1946 Temperature tolerances in the American alligator and their bearing on the habits, evolution and extinction of dinosaurs. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 86, 329–373. (9) GRIGG, G. C., SEEBACHER, F. BEARD, L & D. MORRIS,
1998 Thermal relations of large crocodiles, Crocodylus porosus, free ranging in a naturalistic situation. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 265(1407): 1793-1799 (10) SEEBACHER, F., GRIGG, G. & F. BEARD, 1999 Crocodiles as Dinosaurs: Behavioral Thermoregulation in Very Large Ectotherms leads to High and Stable Body
Temperatures. The Journal of Experimental Biology 202, 77–86 (1999) (11) TATTERSALL, G. J., CADENA, V., SKINNER, M. C., 2006 Respiratory cooling and thermoregulatory coupling in reptiles. Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology 154 (2006) 302–318.