Intro;

Historical criticism (also known as the historical-critical method or higher criticism) is a branch of
criticism that investigates the origins of ancient texts in order to understand "the world behind the text“
and emphasizes a process that "delays any assessment of scripture’s truth and relevance until after the
act of interpretation has been carried out".

Historical theory and criticism embrace not only the theory and practice of literary historiographical
representation but also other types of criticism that, often without acknowledgment, presuppose a
historical ground or adopt historical methods in an ad hoc fashion. Very frequently, what is called
literary criticism, particularly as it was institutionalized in the nineteenth century and even up to the late
twentieth century, is based on historical principles.

Major literary terms of historical criticism

Historical criticism is an approach to literary analysis that focuses on understanding a work of literature
in its historical context. This method considers the social, cultural, political, and economic factors that
influenced the creation of a literary work. Here are some major literary terms associated with historical
criticism:

Historical Context: The background of a literary work, including the time period, cultural influences, and
societal norms prevalent during the author's life.

Periodization: The division of history into distinct periods based on specific characteristics or events.
Understanding the periodization of a work helps situate it within a broader historical framework.

Cultural Hegemony: The dominance or control of a particular cultural group or ideology over society,
influencing literature and shaping the perspectives of authors and their works.

Ideological Criticism: Analyzing a text in terms of the ideological beliefs prevalent during the time of its
creation, and exploring how those beliefs are reflected or challenged in the work.

Social History: The study of everyday life, customs, and social structures of a specific historical period,
which can provide insights into the context of a literary work.

Intertextuality: The relationship between different texts, including references, allusions, or influences
from one work to another. Historical criticism often examines how an author engages with or reacts to
other texts of their time.

New Historicism: A literary theory that emphasizes the interdependence of literature and historical
context, rejecting the notion of an objective reality and focusing on the power dynamics within society.

Authorial Intent: Considering the author's purpose and motivation in writing a particular work, taking
into account the historical circumstances that may have influenced their creative decisions.

Reception History: Studying how a literary work was received and interpreted by its contemporary
audience, as well as subsequent generations, to understand evolving perspectives over time.

Archetypal Criticism: Examining recurring symbols, themes, or character types that have cultural and
historical significance, providing insight into the collective unconscious of a society during a specific
period.

Material Culture: Exploring the physical artifacts, objects, and elements of daily life in a particular
historical period, which can provide context for understanding literary works.

Gender Studies: Analyzing the roles, expectations, and representations of gender within a historical
context, shedding light on how societal attitudes toward gender influenced literary creations.
By employing these terms and concepts, historical criticism aims to enrich the interpretation of
literature by placing it within the broader context of its time, allowing for a more nuanced
understanding of the work and its cultural significance.

Strengths of Historical Criticism

Historical criticism offers several strengths as an approach to literary analysis, providing valuable insights
into the context and influences that shape literary works. Some of its key strengths include:

Contextual Understanding: Historical criticism emphasizes the importance of understanding a literary

work within its historical, social, and cultural context. This approach helps readers grasp the nuances
and meanings that may be specific to a particular time and place.

Interdisciplinary Perspective: Historical criticism encourages the integration of insights from various
disciplines such as history, sociology, anthropology, and cultural studies. This interdisciplinary approach
enriches the analysis by providing a broader and more comprehensive view of the literary work.

Critical Examination of Traditions: Historical criticism encourages a critical examination of literary

traditions and conventions within their historical context. This approach helps readers understand how
authors engage with or challenge established norms, contributing to the evolution of literary forms.

While historical criticism has its strengths, it's important to note that no single approach is exhaustive.
Combining historical criticism with other literary theories and approaches can lead to a more
comprehensive and multifaceted understanding of literature.

Weaknesses of Historical criticism

Despite its strengths, historical criticism also has some weaknesses and limitations as an approach to
literary analysis. Here are a few notable weaknesses:

Limited Focus: Historical criticism may place excessive emphasis on historical context, potentially
overshadowing other important elements such as literary craftsmanship, linguistic choices, and aesthetic
qualities. This narrow focus may lead to an oversimplified understanding of a literary work.

Reliance on Documentation: The availability and accuracy of historical documentation can vary, and
some periods may have more limited records than others. This lack of comprehensive historical data
may hinder the thorough examination of a work within its context.

Neglect of Postmodern and Experimental Works: The historical criticism approach may face challenges
when analyzing postmodern or experimental literature that deliberately challenges traditional historical
narratives and structures. These works may resist easy categorization within conventional historical
contexts.

Example of historical Criticism

"Macbeth" was written and performed in the early 17th century during the reign of King James I of
England. At this time, England was undergoing significant political and social changes, and there was a
heightened interest in witchcraft and the supernatural.

Activity

Basahin niyo na sa screen.

Conclusion and Summary

In conclusion

Historical criticism is a literary and cultural analysis approach that focuses on understanding a work of
literature within its historical context. This method involves examining the social, political, economic,
and cultural factors that influenced the creation of a literary work. That will be all for today thank you
for listening.