Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Same-day Discharge after Appendectomy Results

in Cost Savings and Improved Efficiency


SANDRA M. FARACH, M.D., PAUL D. DANIELSON, M.D., N. ELIZABETH WALFORD, M.D.,
RICHARD P. HARMEL, JR., M.D., NICOLE M. CHANDLER, M.D.

From the Division of Pediatric Surgery, All Children’s Hospital/Johns Hopkins Medicine, St. Petersburg, Florida

Appendectomy incurs significant costs for the healthcare system. There is evidence that patients
can be safely discharged the same day after appendectomy. The purpose of this study was to
develop an evidence-based protocol for same-day discharge after appendectomy. A fast-track
surgery protocol was developed for same-day discharge after appendectomy. This was pro-
spectively applied to all patients presenting for appendectomy from July 2012 to June 2013.
Demographics, clinical measures, and outcomes were measured. Of 206 patients eligible for same-
day discharge, 185 (90%) were successfully discharged according to the protocol. The mean length
of stay after appendectomy was 3.1 6 1.4 hours. Protocol implementation reduced inpatient use
from 99 to 53 per cent. Patient transfers were reduced, resulting in 40 per cent fewer handoffs. The
decreased use of hospital resources resulted in a median reduction of hospital charges of $4111 per
patient. The complication rate for patients discharged the same day was 2.7 per cent. Appendec-
tomy for acute appendicitis or interval appendectomy can be performed safely as same-day sur-
gery. Implementation of this protocol resulted in optimization of resource use by reducing
inpatient admissions, decreasing handoffs, and reducing hospital costs.

most common urgent pediat- discharge after appendectomy for acute appendicitis
A PPENDECTOMY IS THE
ric surgical procedure with approximately 71,000
cases performed per year in children younger than 15
and interval appendectomy with emphasis on safety
and cost standards. The second was to study outcomes
years of age.1 A recent epidemiologic study in the after implementation and standardization of a fast-
United States from 1993 to 2008 showed an incidence track appendectomy protocol in a free-standing pedi-
of acute appendicitis to be 9.4 cases per 10,000 pa- atric hospital.
tients.2 This is a disease that incurs significant costs for
the healthcare system with an estimated $680 million
in hospital use charges annually.3 Methods
Although appendectomy is rarely an elective pro- A literature search was performed to determine
cedure, patients undergoing appendectomy for acute evidence-based best practice for same-day surgical
appendicitis are commonly discharged from the hos- management of acute appendicitis. A protocol for
pital within 24 hours. Same-day surgery has been fast-track appendectomy was developed and was pro-
widely accepted for a number of surgical procedures in spectively applied to all patients with acute appendi-
the pediatric population, including circumcision, her- citis presenting for appendectomy during the study
nia repair, orchidopexy, and correction of hypospa- period from July 2012 to June 2013 (Fig. 1). Patients
dias.4 Prospective studies have shown that up to 80 per presenting for initial evaluation and those undergoing
cent of children may be successfully discharged on the interval appendectomy were considered for same-day
day of operation.5–8 discharge. After obtaining Institutional Review Board
The aim of this study was twofold. The first was approval (IRB 13-0601), a retrospective review of the
to develop an evidence-based protocol for same-day prospectively collected data during the study period
was performed.
Presented at the Annual Scientific Meeting and Postgraduate
Course Program, Southeastern Surgical Congress, Savannah, GA,
February 22–25, 2014. Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Sandra M.
Farach, M.D., All Children’s Hospital Outpatient Care Center, 601
Inclusion criteria for enrollment included patients
5th Street South, Department 70-6600, 3rd Floor, St. Petersburg, FL younger than 21 years of age undergoing appendec-
33701. E-mail: sandra.farach@allkids.org. tomy for a diagnosis of acute appendicitis or interval

787
788 THE AMERICAN SURGEON August 2014 Vol. 80

FIG. 1. The traditional and fast-track patient


flow pathway. (A) The traditional patient flow
through hospitalization with transfer to six dif-
ferent care areas and five patient handoffs. (B)
The fast-track patient flow with transfer to four
different care areas and three patient handoffs.

appendectomy. Preoperative exclusion criteria included: standard verbal and written instructions as well as
complex appendicitis treated medically, pre-existing viewed an educational video before discharge. Patients
complex medical conditions not suitable for outpatient were discharged home without any antibiotics once
surgery, inadvertent admission to the inpatient unit, discharge criteria were met.
social indications, or late operation. Postoperative ex- Admission to the inpatient ward occurred from the
clusion criteria included intraoperative findings of PACU for the following reasons: the operation oc-
suppurative, gangrenous, or perforated appendicitis; curred too late for discharge, discharge criteria were
fever greater than 38°C; hemodynamic changes; in- not met (febrile, hemodynamic changes, unable to
ability to void; poor oral intake; or inadequate pain tolerate liquids, inadequate pain control), or for social
control. Patients who did not meet inclusion criteria or reasons (family refusal, no transportation, home greater
were excluded were treated per the standard group than 30 minutes from a hospital). All patients were
practice based on diagnosis and clinical status. contacted by a perioperative nurse by telephone within
24 hours of discharge and seen by one of the four pe-
Surgical Details diatric surgery attendings in the outpatient clinic two
Once the need for appendectomy was determined, weeks after surgery.
patients remained in the emergency center under ob-
servation status or were transferred to the preoperative Analysis
holding area, depending on the time of day. One of four
Demographics and outcomes were measured for all
attending pediatric surgeons performed all appendec-
patients who underwent appendectomy during the
tomies on a rotating basis determined by call schedule
study period (Table 1). Postoperative length of stay
with the aid of a pediatric surgery Fellow or midlevel
was defined as time of arrival to the PACU until the
provider. All patients received preoperative antibiotics.
time the patient was discharged from the hospital.
Appendectomy was performed by an open, multiport
Numeric values were calculated as mean values with
laparoscopic, or single-incision laparoscopic technique
a standard deviation. Continuous data were analyzed
based on surgeon preference. Our group has previously
using Student’s t test and significance was considered
described and published our operative approach.9, 10
at P < 0.05.
Acute appendicitis was defined as appendiceal hyper-
emia, dilation, or inflammation without the presence
of fibrinous exudate, turbid peritoneal fluid, or Results
perforation.
A total of 349 children presented for appendectomy
during the study period from July 2012 to June 2013
Postoperative Details
(Fig. 2). The mean age for all patients was 11.5 ± 3.8
After appendectomy, patients were transferred to the years with a range of 1.5 to 20.6 years. Preoperatively,
postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Patients received 303 patients were classified as acute appendicitis or
No. 8 SAME-DAY DISCHARGE AFTER APPENDECTOMY ? Farach et al. 789

TABLE 1. Patient Demographics and Outcomes


Total No. of Patients Nonfast-track Pathway Fast-track Pathway P Value*
Number of patients 349 164 185
Male 208 (59.6%) 97 (59%) 111 (60%) 0.9131
Age, mean ± SD (range) (years) 11.5 ± 3.8 (1.5–20.6) 11.8 ± 4.1 (1.5–20.6) 11.3 ± 3.6 (3–18.9) 0.2154
Weight, mean ± SD (range) (kg) 45.9 ± 21 (11.7–124.4) 47.2 ± 22.3 (11.7–124.4) 44.7 ± 19.7 (15.3–112) 0.2688
WBC, mean ± SD (range) 14.9 ± 5 (2.4–30.7) 15.9 ± 4.9 (2.4–30.7) 13.9 ± 4.8 (2.9–28.3) 0.0002
CRP, mean ± SD (range) 5 ± 6.4 (0.05–33.7) 7.4 ± 7.8 (0.05–33.7) 2.6 ± 2.8 (0.2–20.7) 0.0001
OR time, mean ± SD 24.9 ± 9.6 (10–105) 25.7 ± 11.3 (10–105) 24.4 ± 7.7 (10–52) 0.2106
(range) (minutes)
Appendectomy type
Single-incision laparoscopy 160 (45.8%) 73 (44.5%) 87 (47%)
Multiport laparoscopy 105 (30.1%) 60 (36.6%) 45 (24.4%)
Open 84 (24.1%) 31 (18.9%) 53 (28.6%)
Intraoperative findings
Acute 195 (55.9%) 35 (21.3%) 160 (86.5%)
Interval 20 (5.7%) 0 20 (10.8%)
Suppurative/gangrenous 80 (22.9%) 77 (47%) 3 (1.6%)
Perforated 52 (14.9%) 52 (31.7%) 0
Normal 2 (0.6%) 0 2 (1.1%)
LOS, mean ± SD 32.7 ± 66.1 (1–749.6) 66.1 ± 84.8 (3.1–749.6) 3.1 ± 1.4 (1–11.1) 0.0001
(range) (hours)
Complications 23 (6.6%) 18 (11%) 5 (2.7%) 0.0021
Superficial wound infection 7 6 2
Intra-abdominal abscess 6 5 0
Ileus/bowel obstruction 7 5 2
Other 3 2 1
* P values compare nonfast-track pathway to fast-track pathway patients.
SD, standard deviation; WBC, white blood cell count; CRP, C-reactive protein; OR, operating room; LOS, length of stay from
postanesthesia care unit arrival to discharge.

interval appendectomy and were initiated on the fast- This decrease in use of inpatient resources resulted in
track pathway. Intraoperatively, 206 (68%) were found a median reduction in hospital charges of $4111 per
to have acute appendicitis or interval appendectomy patient discharged from the PACU after appendec-
and continued on the protocol. A total of 185 patients tomy. This resulted in a total savings of $760,535
were discharged from the PACU after appendectomy, during the 1-year study period.
which comprised 90 per cent of patients with acute
appendicitis.
Discussion
The mean length of time to first oral intake was
51.7 ± 29.6 minutes. The mean number of parenteral The fast-track concept was first described by Henrik
narcotic doses was 2 ± 1.4, and mean number of enteral Kehlet to optimize perioperative care in elective sur-
narcotic doses was 1 ± 0.4. The mean postoperative gery.11 Implementation of this concept encompasses
length of stay for patients discharged from the PACU preoperative instruction, immediate postoperative
was 3.1 ± 1.4 hours (range, 1 to 11.1 hours). The feeding and mobilization, preference of minimally
complication rate for those patients who completed the invasive techniques, and specific pain control tech-
fast-track appendectomy protocol was 2.7 per cent niques.11, 12 In adults, fast-track surgery has been de-
compared with 6.7 per cent for all patients with ap- scribed for a number of surgical procedures, some of
pendicitis over the study period. Complications for which include cholecystectomy, bariatric surgery, co-
those completing the protocol included two surgical lonic surgery, pulmonary resection, reflux surgery,
site infections treated with outpatient oral antibiotics, prostate surgery, adrenal surgery, breast surgery, and
one patient with ileus, one patient with small bowel thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Implementation has
obstruction requiring exploratory laparotomy and lysis been shown to significantly reduce length of stay and
of adhesions, and one patient with Henoch-Schönlein reduce complication rates.13 In one prospective study,
purpura presenting with hematochezia, nephritis, and 80 per cent of pediatric patients were discharged after
Clostridium difficile infection. laparoscopic appendectomy on the same day with
Patients successfully discharged the same day did a mean postoperative length of stay of 4.8 hours with
not enter the inpatient facility, resulting in a decrease no increase in complication or readmission rates. Of
in patient transfers from six to four and a 40 per cent patients with acute appendicitis, 55 per cent never
decrease in patient handoffs from five to three (Fig. 1). entered into the inpatient facility.7
790 THE AMERICAN SURGEON August 2014 Vol. 80

FIG. 2. The hierarchy and number of patients throughout the course of the fast-track protocol: patients included in the protocol,
patients excluded from the protocol, and indications for exclusion from the protocol.

Our experience is that 90 per cent of patients with to replicate anesthesia given during ambulatory
acute appendicitis can be safely discharged from the procedures.
PACU. The successful implementation of this protocol Standardized protocols such as this one impact the
centered on a multidisciplinary approach, which in- delivery of care by decreasing handoffs, reducing in-
volved members of the emergency medicine, anes- patient admission, standardizing communication, and
thesia, surgery staff, and administration. There was reducing length of stay. Traditionally, in our facility,
a focused awareness on changes in patient flow pro- patients with acute appendicitis moved through six
cess, handoffs, pain control measures, and discharge different care locations resulting in five handoffs. The
education. Protocol implementation included detailed Children’s Hospital Association states that one-third of
preoperative, perioperative, postoperative, and follow- sentinel events are associated with handoff communi-
up guidelines. Criteria were developed and clearly cation failures.14 This fast-track protocol reduced the
defined to determine suitability for patient placement number of handoffs by 40 per cent, thus decreasing the
in the protocol. The anesthesia model was changed potential for medical errors.
No. 8 SAME-DAY DISCHARGE AFTER APPENDECTOMY ? Farach et al. 791

This protocol became the expected course at our REFERENCES


institution for children undergoing appendectomy for 1. Hall MJ, DeFrances CJ, Williams SN, et al. National Hospital
acute appendicitis or interval appendectomy. Imple- Discharge Survey: 2007 summary. Natl Health Stat Rep 2010;29:
mentation of this protocol resulted in a postoperative 1–20, 24.
length of stay of three hours for patients completing 2. Buckius MT, McGrath B, Monk J, et al. Changing epidemi-
ology of acute appendicitis in the United States: study period
the fast-track pathway and led to a reduction in in-
1993–2008. J Surg Res 2012;172:185–90.
patient use from 99 to 53 per cent for patients with 3. Guthery SL, Hutchings C, Dean JM, et al. National estimates
acute appendicitis. The decreased use of inpatient re- of hospital utilization by children with gastrointestinal disorders:
sources realized a total savings of $760,535 per year analysis of the 1997 Kids’ Inpatient Database. J Pediatr Surg 2004;
for our institution. Given that nearly 71,000 appen- 144:589–94.
dectomies are performed yearly in children and 53 per 4. Akkoyun I. Outpatient laparoscopic appendectomy in chil-
cent may be eligible for early discharge, this simple dren: a single center experience with 92 cases. Surg Laparosc
approach could result in nearly $155 million cost Endosc 2013;23:49–50.
savings yearly. 5. Reismann M, Kampen M, Laupichler RS, et al. Fast-track
Despite the current evidence to support the bene- surgery in infants and children. J Pediatr Surg 2007;42:234–8.
fits of fast-track surgery management, implementa- 6. Reismann M, Dingemann J, Wolters M, et al. Fast-track
concepts in routine pediatric surgery: a prospective study in 436
tion into daily practice has been slow, and most
infants and children. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2008;394:529–33.
perioperative care is still traditional at many in- 7. Alkhoury F, Burnweit C, Malvezzi L, et al. A prospective
stitutions.15 Adoption into routine clinical practice is study of safety and satisfaction with same-day discharge after
dependent on a multidisciplinary approach that in- laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg
cludes education and organizational changes within 2012;47:313–6.
the hospital. There is a need for evidence-based 8. Alkhoury F, Malvezzi L, Knight C, et al. Routine same-day
studies for the standardization of procedure-specific discharge after acute or interval appendectomy in children. Arch
and/or organ-specific fast-track protocols. The Surg 2013;147:443–6.
implementation of such protocols has the poten- 9. Chandler NM, Danielson PD. Single-incision laparoscopic
tial for improving the quality and effectiveness of appendectomy vs multiport laparoscopic appendectomy in chil-
health care. dren: a retrospective comparison. J Ped Surg 2010;45:2186–90.
10. Litz C, Danielson PD, Gould J, et al. Financial impact of
surgical technique in the treatment of acute appendicitis in chil-
dren. Am Surg 2013;79:857–60.
Conclusion 11. Wilmore DW, Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast
track surgery. BMJ 2001;322:473–6.
Our institution was successful in creating a fast- 12. Kehlet H. Effect of postoperative pain treatment and
track appendectomy protocol for patients presenting outcome—current status and future strategies. Langenbecks Arch
with acute appendicitis or interval appendectomy. Surg 2004;389:244–9.
Implementation resulted in optimization of resource 13. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and
use by reducing inpatient admission, decreasing the the evolution of fast track surgery. Ann Surg 2008;248:189–98.
14. The Joint Commission. Sentinel event data: Root causes by
number patient handoffs, and reducing hospital costs.
event type. Available at: www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/
Appendectomy for acute appendicitis or interval ap- Root_Causes_by_Event_Type_2004-2Q2013.pdf. Accessed Sep-
pendectomy can be performed safely as same-day tember 20, 2013.
surgery while improving quality of care. Significant 15. Adamina M, Kehlet H, Tomlinson GA, et al. Enhanced re-
healthcare benefits may result with adopting the fast- covery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utiliza-
track protocol as the standard treatment for acute ap- tion: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal
pendicitis in children. surgery. Surgery 2011;149:830–40.

You might also like