Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full Download Solution Manual For Essential Foundations of Economics 8Th Edition Robin Bade Michael Parkin PDF
Full Download Solution Manual For Essential Foundations of Economics 8Th Edition Robin Bade Michael Parkin PDF
ed States. With international trade, Brazil will export shoes to the United
States. The price of a pair of shoes in the United States will fall and the
quantity of shoes produced in the United States will decrease. Both coun-
tries will gain from this trade. In Brazil producers of shoes gain (consum-
ers of shoes lose, but the gain to the producers exceeds the loss to con-
sumers) and in the United States consumers of shoes gain (producers of
shoes lose, but the gain to the consumers exceeds the loss to producers).
2. The world price of a pair of shoes is $20. Explain how consumer surplus
and producer surplus in the United States changes as a result of interna-
tional trade. On the graph, show the change in U.S. consumer surplus
(label it A) and the change in U.S. producer surplus (label it B).
The consumer surplus of U.S. consumers in-
creases because the price U.S. consumers pay
for a pair of shoes falls. As a result of the fall
in price, U.S. consumers increase the number
of shoes they buy. Consumer surplus increas-
es because the price falls and because the
quantity of shoes purchased increases. The
producer surplus of U.S. producers decreas-
es because of the fall in the price of a pair of
shoes. As a result of the fall in price, U.S. pro-
ducers decrease the quantity of shoes they
produce. Producer surplus decreases both be-
cause the price falls and because the quantity
of shoes produced decreases. Figure 8.3 shows
the change in consumer surplus and the
change in producer surplus. The increase in
consumer surplus equals the area A + B (the
part of the light colored gain that lies beneath area B is not visible). The
loss of producer surplus equals the dark gray area B.
3. The world price of shoes is $20. Explain how consumer surplus and pro-
ducer surplus in Brazil change as a result of international trade. Show the
change in Brazil’s consumer surplus (label it C) and the change in Brazil’s
producer surplus (label it D).
The consumer surplus of Brazilian consumers decreases because the price
Brazilian consumers pay for a pair of shoes rises. As a result of the rise in
price, Brazilian consumers decrease the number of shoes they buy. Con-
sumer surplus decreases both because the price rises and because the
quantity of shoes purchased decreases. The producer surplus of Brazil-
ian producers increases because of the rise in the price of a pair of shoes.
As a result of the rise in price, Brazilian producers increase the quantity of
shoes they produce. Producer surplus increases both because the price
7. Suppose that the U.S. government puts an import quota on roses. Show
on your graph the consumer surplus that is redistributed to producers
and importers and also the deadweight loss created by the import quota.
In Figure 8.7, the import quota is equal to the
length of the light grey arrow, 100,000 dozen
roses per month. With the import quota in
place, the supply curve becomes S1 so that the
equilibrium price in the United States is $20
per dozen and equilibrium quantity becomes
300,000 dozen. The consumer surplus is redis-
tributed to producers (the area of the light
grey trapezoid) and to importers (the area of
the light grey rectangle). The deadweight loss
is equal to the area of the two dark grey trian-
gles.
on steel imports. How do you expect the prices of automobiles and office
towers to be affected?
The U.S. producers of steel will gain. If the restriction is a tariff, the U.S.
government will gain because it will receive additional tariff revenue. If
the restriction is an import quota, than the importers of the steel gain. U.S.
consumers of steel will lose. The higher price of steel increases the costs of
building automobiles and constructing office towers. The cost of produc-
ing automobiles and office towers increases, which decreases their supply
and thereby raises their prices.
9. What is dumping? Who in the United States loses from China’s dumping
of steel?
Dumping occurs when a foreign firm sells its exports at a lower price than
the cost of production. U.S. producers of steel lose from China’s dumping
of steel.
10. Explain what an antidumping tariff is. What argument might U.S.
steelmakers use to get the government to raise the tariff on steel imports?
Dumping is illegal under the rules of international trade, so dumping is
regarded as a justifiable reason for a temporary tariff. U.S. steelmakers
might argue that Chinese exporters of steel were charging a price that was
less than the cost of production. A tariff could be imposed that would
raise the price to the (alleged) cost of production.
11. Read Eye on Globalization on p. 203 and draw two graphs to show how
U.S. consumers gain from iPads manufactured in China and why Chinese
workers also gain.
Figure 9.8 shows the market for iPads in the
United States. As the figure illustrates, U.S.
consumers gain because they pay a lower
price and consequently buy more iPads. In
the figure the price falls from $300 per iPad
with no trade to $200 per iPad with trade.
The lower price means that consumers in-
crease the quantity of iPads they buy, in the
figure from 75 million iPads per year to 100
million per year.
Figure 9.9 (on the next page) shows that Chi-
nese workers also gain. As the figure illus-
trates, Chinese workers gain because more
iPads will be produced in China. Conse-
quently, more workers are employed and po-
tentially their wage rate also rises. In the fig-
ure the price rises from $100 per iPad with
no trade to $200 per iPad with trade. The
quantity of iPads produced in China increas-
es from 75 million with no trade to 100 mil-
lion with trade.
3. The United States exports wheat. Draw a graph to illustrate the U.S.
wheat market if there is free international trade in wheat. On your graph,
mark the price of wheat and the quantities bought, produced, and export-
ed by the United States.
Figure 8.11 illustrates the situation. In the
figure, without international trade, the price
of a bushel of wheat in the United States is $2
per bushel and 20 billion bushels are grown
and consumed. With international trade the
price of a bushel of wheat in the United States
rises to $6 per bushel. At this higher price, 10
billion bushels are consumed and 40 billion
are produced. The difference between the
quantity produced and the quantity
consumed, which is 30 billion bushels, is
exported by the United States.
4. Suppose that the world price of sugar is 20 cents a pound, Brazil does not
trade internationally, and the equilibrium price of sugar in Brazil is 10
cents a pound. Brazil then begins to trade internationally.
• How does the price of sugar in Brazil change? Do Brazilians buy
more or less sugar? Do Brazilian sugar growers produce more or less
sugar?
With international trade, the price of sugar rises in Brazil. Brazilian con-
sumers buy less sugar. Brazilian sugar growers produce more sugar.
• Does Brazil export or import sugar and why?
Brazil exports sugar. The world price of sugar is higher than the Brazilian
price of sugar, so sugar will be exported from Brazil.
5. The United States exports services and imports coffee. Why does the
United States gain from exporting services and importing coffee? How do
economists measure the net gain from this international trade?
The United States gains from exporting services because the United States
receives a higher price for the services it produces than would otherwise
be the case. For exports, producers gain increased producer surplus while
consumers lose consumer surplus. But the increase in producer surplus is
larger than the loss in consumer surplus. The United States gains from
importing coffee because the United States pays a lower price for the cof-
fee it consumes than would otherwise be the case. For imports, consumers
gain increased consumer surplus while producers lose producer surplus.
But the increase in consumer surplus is larger than the loss in producer
surplus. Economists measure the net gain from international trade as the
increase in the total surplus.
6. In the 1950s, Ford and General Motors established a small car-producing
industry in Australia and argued for a high tariff on car imports. The
tariff has remained through the years. Until 2000, the tariff was 22.5
percent. What might have been Ford’s and General Motor’s argument for
the high tariff? Is the tariff the best way to achieve the goals of the
argument?
Most likely the argument in favor of the tariff was the infant-industry ar-
gument. According to proponents of this argument, protection is neces-
sary to a new industry to enable it to grow into a mature industry that can
compete in world markets. Alternatively, Ford and General Motors might
also have argued that a high tariff was necessary to protect Australian
jobs. Protection is not the best way to achieve these goals. A more efficient
way to protect infant industries is to subsidize the firms in the industry.
And the jobs lost in the auto sector will be regained in other sectors de-
voted to exporting Australian goods.
Use Figure 8.12 and the following information to
work Problems 7 to 9.
Figure 8.12 shows the car market in Mexico when
Mexico places no restriction on the quantity of
cars imported. The world price of a car is $10,000.
7. If the government of Mexico introduces a
$2,000 tariff on car imports, what will be the
price of a car in Mexico, the quantity of cars
produced in Mexico, the quantity imported
into Mexico, and the government’s tariff rev-
enue?
If the Mexican government imposes a $2,000
per car tariff on cars imported into Mexico,
the price of a car in Mexico rises from $10,000
to $12,000. At this price, 10 million cars per
year will be purchased in Mexico and 6 mil-
lion cars per year will be produced in Mexi-
co. The difference, 4 million cars per year, will be imported. The Mexican
government’s tariff revenue is $2,000 per car multiplied by 4 million cars
imported, which is $8 billion per year.
8. If the government of Mexico introduces an import quota of 4 million cars
a year, what will be the price of a car in Mexico, the quantity of cars pro-
duced in Mexico, and the quantity imported?
If the Mexican government imposes an import quota of 4 million cars a
year, the price of a car in Mexico will rise from $10,000 to $12,000. At this
new, higher price, the quantity of cars demanded in Mexico is 10 million;
the quantity of cars produced in Mexico is 6 million. The difference be-
tween Mexican consumption and Mexican production, 4 million, is equal
to the amount of the import quota and so is imported from abroad.
9. What argument might be used to encourage the government of Mexico to
introduce a $2,000 tariff on car imports from the United States? Who will
gain and who will lose as a result of Mexico’s tariff?
The tariff might be imposed because the government gains revenue from
the tariffs it imposes. It might also be imposed because of rent seeking, in
particular, auto producers who profit from the tariff might lobby inten-
sively to impose the tariff. They likely will suggest that the Mexican auto
industry is new (an infant) and therefore needs protection until it matures
and can compete with the rest of the world. They might also argue that a
tariff will save (actually, gain) jobs in Mexico because of the expansion of
Mexican auto production.
Mexican auto producers and the Mexican government gain from the
tariff. The auto producers have more producer surplus and the Mexican
government gains tariff revenue. Mexican consumers lose from the tariff.
The consumers have less consumer surplus with the tariff.
3. With free trade between the United States and Canada, the United States
exports tomatoes and Canada exports maple syrup. U.S. consumers
______.
A. of tomatoes gain and Canadian consumers of maple syrup lose
B. of both tomatoes and maple syrup gain more than either producer
C. of maple syrup gain more than U.S. producers of maple syrup lose
D. of tomatoes gain more than U.S. producers of tomatoes lose
Answer: C Figure 8.3 in the text shows that imports create a net gain in
total surplus.
4. With free trade between China and the United States, the winners are
___________ and the losers are _______.
A. U.S. consumers of U.S. imports; U.S. producers of the U.S. import
good
B. China’s consumers of China’s imports; China’s producers of its ex-
port good
C. U.S. producers of the U.S. export good; U.S. consumers of U.S. im-
ports
D. China’s consumers of China’s export good; China’s producers of its
imported good
Answer: A Figure 8.3 in the text shows that the U.S. price of the imported
good falls, so that U.S. consumers win and U.S. producers
lose.
5. The U.S. tariff on paper ____ the U.S. price of paper, _____ U.S. produc-
tion of paper and _______the U.S. gains from trade.
A. raises; increases; increases
B. doesn’t change; increases; increases
C. doesn’t change; doesn’t change; decreases
D. raises; increases; decreases
Answer: D Figure 8.6 in the textbook illustrates these results.
6. If Korea imposes an import quota on U.S. oranges, losers include Korean
_______ of oranges and U.S. ______ of oranges.
A. consumers; consumers
B. consumers; producers
C. producers; consumers
D. producers; producers
Answer: B The import quote decreases U.S. exports of oranges to Korea,
thereby harming U.S. producers, and raises the price of or-
anges in Korea, thereby harming Korean consumers.
7. The people who support restricted international trade say that ______.
A. protection saves jobs, in both the U.S. and foreign economies
B. U.S. firms won’t be able to compete with low-wage foreign labor if
trade is free
C. outsourcing sends jobs abroad, which brings diversification and
makes our economy more stable
D. protection is needed to enable U.S. firms to produce the things at
which they have a comparative advantage
Answer: B This commonly encountered argument is flawed, because
U.S. firms can compete when U.S. productivity is high.
Homeward Bound
Page 11
which there is no excurse changed to
which there is no excuse
Page 13
and in the tussel changed to
and in the tussle
Page 23
just as the Almight changed to
just as the Almighty Father placed
Page 33
climbing to the futtoch changed to
climbing to the futtock-shrouds
Page 43
corpusant lights were seen changed to
corposant lights were seen
Page 48
chief named Te Aroa changed to
chief named Te Araroa
Page 52
mollyhawks screeched through the rigging changed to
mollymawks screeched through the rigging
Page 55
said at the beginning, Scandanavians changed to
said at the beginning, Scandinavians
Page 70
of the s.s. “Bogata,” of the Pacific Navigation changed to
of the s.s. “Bogota,” of the Pacific Navigation
Page 93
took my sheath knife an changed to
took my sheath knife and
Page 102
some cooking utnesils changed to
some cooking utensils
Page 105
One of them, called Yunkque changed to
One of them, called Yunque
Page 106
flemish-eyes, splices, seezings changed to
flemish-eyes, splices, seizings
Page 123
I ever met with were the lima changed to
I ever met with were the llama
Page 124
the stone of the Incas, a marcusite changed to
the stone of the Incas, a marcasite
Page 125
“miradores” or carved wooden balconies changed to
“miradors” or carved wooden balconies
Page 125
revelry for three days and the “miradores” changed to
revelry for three days and the “miradors”
Page 129
contractor was Henry Meiggs, of Calfornia changed to
contractor was Henry Meiggs, of California
Page 132
horrible squarking noise changed to
horrible squawking noise
Page 133
With screeching and squarking changed to
With screeching and squawking
Page 160
meeting one of the Gambeta Indian changed to
meeting one of the Gambetta Indian
Page 183
then fitted up for a jury mast changed to
then fitted up for a jurymast
Page 190
growing in the Titree scrub changed to
growing in the Ti tree scrub
Page 193
Titree scrub that was too thick changed to
Ti tree scrub that was too thick
Page 203
stringy bark, tie tree and various changed to
stringy bark, ti tree and various
Page 210
wild horses, kangaroos and wallabys changed to
wild horses, kangaroos and wallabies
Page 211
of the mammalia which possess changed to
of the Mammalia which possess
Page 246
roll the two lower topasils changed to
roll the two lower topsails
Page 247
contiuually going to keep her changed to
continually going to keep her
Page 249
pitchpine lower mast was put changed to
pitch pine lower mast was put
Page 272
on these were erected either corrurugated changed to
on these were erected either corrugated
Page 307
corrobberee—by-en-by white fellow changed to
corrobboree—by-en-by white fellow
Page 308
of sweet potatoes, tara, bananas, sago changed to
of sweet potatoes, taro, bananas, sago
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK AT THE BACK
OF THE WORLD ***