Navigating Change in GreenFuture Energy Solutions:

Models, Implementation, and Impact Assessment

Mohammad Almousa

13 December 2023
TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION:.................................................................................................................................................3

TASK 1: ADDRESSING ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE IN GREENFUTURE ENERGY SOLUTIONS

..........................................................................................................................................................................3

1.1 Models or Frameworks for Organizational Change.......................................................................3

1.2 Change Solutions and Problem-Solving Techniques......................................................................3
1.3 Organizational Strategy and Alignment with Solutions.................................................................4

TASK 2: EVALUATING CHANGE IMPLEMENTATION MODELS...........................................................4

2.1 Change Implementation Models.....................................................................................................4

2.2 Criteria for Evaluating Change Implementation Models................................................................4

TASK 3: MONITORING AND MANAGING CHANGE...................................................................................5

3.1 Application of Analytical Tools for Monitoring Change...............................................................5

3.2 Strategies for Change Management and Risk Assessment.............................................................6
3.3 Review and Evaluation of the Change Plan....................................................................................6

TASK 4: EVALUATING RISKS AND COMMUNICATING CHANGE IMPACT.......................................6

4.1 Identifying and Evaluating Risk Factors........................................................................................6

4.2 Analysis of Change Impact and Recommendations.......................................................................7
4.3 Development of PowerPoint Presentation......................................................................................8

CONCLUSION........................................................................................................................................................8

REFERENCES:.......................................................................................................................................................8
INTRODUCTION:

GreenFuture Energy Solutions is a dynamic player in the renewable energy sector, focusing on developing
sustainable energy solutions tailored to both commercial and residential needs. Established a decade ago, the
company has its headquarters nestled in Denver, Colorado, and has grown significantly, now boasting a
dedicated team of around 800 employees. GreenFuture's journey began with a vision to contribute to a cleaner,
more sustainable future, leading them to innovate in areas like solar power, wind energy, and energy-efficient
technologies. With its commitment to environmental sustainability, GreenFuture has not only gained recognition
for its impactful solutions but also for its role in advocating for green initiatives. The company's success lies in
its ability to merge innovative technologies with practical applications, making sustainable energy more
accessible and effective for a diverse range of clients.

TASK 1: ADDRESSING ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE IN GREENFUTURE

ENERGY SOLUTIONS
This overview explores key models for organizational change, such as Lewin's Change Management Model,
Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model, and the McKinsey 7-S Framework, tailored to GreenFuture Energy Solutions.
Additionally, it highlights problem-solving techniques like brainstorming and SWOT analysis, offering specific
change solutions for GreenFuture, such as integrating new technologies and conducting a strategic analysis. The
discussion emphasizes aligning these solutions with GreenFuture’s commitment to innovation in sustainable
energy and ensuring adaptability in the evolving renewable energy landscape.

1.1 MODELS OR FRAMEWORKS FOR ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE

Lewin's Change Management Model: This model involves three stages: Unfreeze, Change, and Refreeze. It's
suitable for GreenFuture Energy Solutions as it provides a structured approach, starting with preparing the
organization for change (Unfreeze), implementing the change (Change), and solidifying new ways into the
culture (Refreeze). This model can be effective in a dynamic sector like renewable energy where adaptability is
key (Lauer, 2021).

Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model: This model offers a comprehensive approach, starting from creating a sense of
urgency to embedding new approaches in the culture (Baloh et al., 2018) . Given GreenFuture’s size and its
advocacy role in the green sector, this model is suitable as it emphasizes buy-in and participation from all levels
of the organization, ensuring that change is broadly accepted and implemented effectively.

McKinsey 7-S Framework: This model focuses on seven internal elements of an organization: Strategy,
Structure, Systems, Shared Values, Skills, Style, and Staff. It's ideal for GreenFuture, particularly considering
the company's focus on innovative technologies and the need to align these innovations with its organizational
strategy and culture (Chmielewska et al., 2022).

1.2 CHANGE SOLUTIONS AND PROBLEM-SOLVING TECHNIQUES

Brainstorming and Mind Mapping: Utilizing these techniques can foster creative solutions for integrating new
renewable energy technologies and practices into GreenFuture's operations (Kernan et al., 2018).

SWOT Analysis: By assessing Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats, GreenFuture can identify
strategic change solutions that align with organizational objectives, like expanding into new markets or
developing new technologies (GÜREL, 2017).
Solution Implementation: For instance, introducing a new project management tool specifically designed for
renewable energy projects can streamline operations, aligning with the organizational goal of efficient and
sustainable energy solutions.

1.3 ORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGY AND ALIGNMENT WITH SOLUTIONS

GreenFuture’s strategy focuses on innovation in sustainable energy solutions. The proposed change solutions,
like adopting new project management technologies or expanding into new markets, align with this strategy as
they contribute to efficiency and market expansion (Amendolagine et al., 2021).

Critically, these solutions must be feasible within the renewable energy sector's rapidly evolving landscape. They
should enhance GreenFuture’s ability to adapt to market changes and technological advancements, thus
positively contributing to its future direction and sustainability objectives.

TASK 2: EVALUATING CHANGE IMPLEMENTATION MODELS

Exploring change models for GreenFuture, the ADKAR Model emphasizes individual change, while Prosci’s 3-
Phase Process offers a comprehensive approach. To evaluate, consider feasibility, ethical alignment, and critical
success factors like employee engagement and market response. The chosen model should align with
GreenFuture's ethics, strategic goals, and ensure effective implementation.

2.1 CHANGE IMPLEMENTATION MODELS

ADKAR Model: This model emphasizes individual change management and is structured around five key
outcomes: Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, and Reinforcement. It's particularly useful in ensuring that
each employee at GreenFuture understands and embraces the change. This model can be linked to Task 1.1 as it
complements broader organizational models like Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model by focusing on individual-level
change (Leksono & Yulianti, 2022).

Prosci's change management methodology, is a process includes three phases: Preparing for Change, Managing
Change, and Reinforcing Change as discussed by (Suganthalakshmi & Muthuvelayutham, 2011) ), is a crucial
component in achieving business results. It combines individual and organizational change management to
ensure success. This approach is further enhanced by Salviano (2009) PRO2PI process improvement
methodology, It has been further customized for education, which is driven by a Process Capability Profile
Model. Together, these methodologies can be applied to various organizational improvement programs.

2.2 CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING CHANGE IMPLEMENTATION MODELS

Feasibility: By thoroughly assessing the feasibility of a change implementation model, organizations can ensure
that the selected model is not only theoretically sound but also practically achievable within their specific
operational context. This criterion helps guard against potential implementation hurdles and enhances the
likelihood of successful change adoption (Cork, 2005).

Ethical Considerations: The model should align with GreenFuture’s commitment to environmental sustainability
and ethical business practices. It should promote transparency, employee wellbeing, and social responsibility
(Kennett-Hensel & Payne, 2018).

Critical Success Factors and KPIs (Clarke & Garside, 1997):

Employee Engagement: Measured through surveys and feedback mechanisms. High engagement levels indicate
successful change adoption.

Project Milestones: Timely completion of specific change milestones indicates effective implementation.

Innovation Metrics: Increased number of new projects or patents in renewable technologies can signal successful
integration of change.
Market Response: Customer feedback and market share growth post-implementation provide insight into the
external effectiveness of the change.

The chosen model should demonstrate strength in these areas, ensuring that it not only facilitates change within
GreenFuture but also aligns with the company’s strategic objectives and ethical standards.

TASK 3: MONITORING AND MANAGING CHANGE

Monitoring the progress of GreenFuture's change is achieved through the Balanced Scorecard and Key
Performance Indicators (KPIs). Enterprise Risk Management identifies risk and shock points. Communication
plans and training programs are implemented as change management strategies. Risk assessment includes
identifying and mitigating risks by diversifying energy solutions and exploring insurance options. The change
plan undergoes ongoing review through periodic assessments, feedback mechanisms, and adjustments, ensuring
adaptability to challenges or opportunities.

3.1 APPLICATION OF ANALYTICAL TOOLS FOR MONITORING CHANGE

Applying analytical tools for monitoring change involves the use of methodologies and instruments to track and
assess the progress and impact of organizational transformations. These tools offer insights to facilitate informed
decision-making and help ensure the change initiative aligns with organizational goals and adapts to evolving
circumstances.

Balanced Scorecard: This tool can be used to monitor progress in various aspects such as financial performance,
customer satisfaction, internal processes, and learning & growth. For GreenFuture, this would include
monitoring budgetary factors and environmental impact, ensuring alignment with strategic objectives
(Gathungu & Nyang’au, 2018)
.

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): Specific KPIs related to renewable energy projects, employee engagement,
and market penetration can be used to track the success of the change. This will include measuring the quality of
output, environmental factors, and cultural changes within the organization (Setiawan & Purba, 2020).

Risk and Shock Points Analysis: Utilizing Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) techniques, GreenFuture can
identify potential risks and shock points associated with the change. This involves analysing factors like market
volatility, technology adoption rates, and regulatory changes in the renewable energy sector (Wing & Jin, 2015).

3.2 STRATEGIES FOR CHANGE MANAGEMENT AND RISK ASSESSMENT

Strategies for change management and risk assessment involve structured approaches to guide organizations
through transitions while identifying and mitigating potential challenges. These strategies are essential for
ensuring successful implementation and minimizing negative impacts. Key components include:

Change Management Strategy:

 Communication Plan: Regular and transparent communication to keep all stakeholders informed and
engaged and to change negative attitudes and counter the resistance of potential users consultation and
communication processes should be established (Van Hau & Kuzic, 2010).

 Training Programs: Staff training is another critical factor for successful change management because it
offers an opportunity for users to adjust to the change and ensure employees have the necessary skills
and knowledge to adapt to new technologies and processes. The successful projects adopted effective
training and knowledge transfer in their change management strategy (Van Hau & Kuzic, 2010).
Risk Assessment:

 Identifying Risks: Identifying risks in renewable energy projects is crucial for effective risk
management. Risk identification involves assessing potential threats and uncertainties that could impact
the project's success, such as changes in government policies, market fluctuations, or operational
failures (Wing & Jin, 2015).

 Risk Mitigation Strategies: Once risks are identified, mitigation strategies can be implemented to
minimize their impact. A comprehensive operational risk management model may involve evaluating
operational risks, implementing appropriate tools and frameworks, monitoring operational risks, and
investigating the causes of loss events. Additionally, strategies to address funding liquidity risk and
asset liquidity risk, which are significant concerns in renewable energy development and the market,
may be necessary (Wing & Jin, 2015).

 Risk Transfer and Reduction: Risk transfer and reduction are also important components of risk
management. The use of risk management instruments, such as optimization-based static bidding
strategies and dynamic bidding strategies, can help reduce cost uncertainty associated with renewable
energy projects (Wing & Jin, 2015).

3.3 REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF THE CHANGE PLAN

The review and evaluation of the change plan represent a crucial phase in the change management process. This
stage involves a systematic assessment of the implemented changes to ensure they align with organizational
objectives and adapt to evolving circumstances (Carney, 2002).

Periodic Reviews: Conducting regular assessments of the change implementation against the set KPIs and
objectives.

Feedback Mechanisms: Using surveys and feedback tools to gauge employee and stakeholder sentiment and
adjusting strategies accordingly.

Adjustments and Adaptations: Being prepared to modify the change plan based on ongoing review measures,
ensuring agility in response to unexpected challenges or opportunities.

TASK 4: EVALUATING RISKS AND COMMUNICATING CHANGE IMPACT

A methodical method for recognizing and assessing risks in the renewable energy industry, encompassing
market shifts, technological progress, and regulatory shifts, is proposed. The approach highlights favorable
aspects like innovation prospects and sustainability trends. The evaluation includes both quantitative and
qualitative measures, taking into account financial repercussions and potential impacts on reputation and
employee morale. Furthermore, it recommends establishing a Delphi Group for analyzing the impact of change,
critically evaluating change strategies and employee reactions, and summarizing results with practical
suggestions.

4.1 IDENTIFYING AND EVALUATING RISK FACTORS

The focus is on recognizing potential challenges and opportunities within the renewable energy sector. The key
risk factors highlighted include market fluctuations, rapid technological advancements, and regulatory changes,
each capable of significantly influencing the strategic direction of operations (Wing & Jin, 2015):
  Market Fluctuations: In the renewable energy sector, market volatility can significantly impact strategic
direction.

 Technological Advancements: Rapid changes in technology could render current methods obsolete.

 Regulatory Changes: Shifts in environmental policies could affect operational processes.

In contrast, positive factors such as innovation opportunities and the increasing public interest in sustainability
are acknowledged as areas for potential growth (Varadarajan, 2017):

 Innovation Opportunities: Leverage GreenFuture's strength in innovative solutions for competitive

advantage.

 Sustainability Trends: Utilize growing public interest in sustainability to expand market share.

To decompose these risks, both quantitative and qualitative analyses are employed. Quantitative analysis,
involving tools like sensitivity analysis, aims to assess the financial impact of identified risks. On the other hand,
qualitative analysis delves into the potential effects on the company's reputation and employee morale, providing
a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted nature of risks in the renewable energy domain
(Mohamadi, 2021)
.

4.2 ANALYSIS OF CHANGE IMPACT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Examining the consequences of changes and offering suggestions for improvement is the focus of this section.
To conduct this assessment, a suggestion to form a Delphi Group. The critical evaluation in this segment covers
the efficacy of change strategies and how well employees are adapting to the introduced changes.

Forming a Delphi Group: Assemble a team of experts within the company to analyze the impact of change. This
group can include members from different departments to provide diverse perspectives (Bloor et al., 2013).

Critical Analysis:

Effectiveness of Change Strategies: Evaluate how well the strategies align with organizational objectives.

Employee Response: Analyze how employees have adapted to the changes.

Summarizing Points and Recommendations:

Identify Successes and Shortcomings: Highlight what worked well and what didn't.

Qualified Recommendations: Offer actionable suggestions for improvement, such as enhancing training
programs or modifying communication strategies.

4.3 DEVELOPMENT OF POWERPOINT PRESENTATION

Audience Profiling: Understand the primary stakeholders or sponsors, their interests, and concerns to tailor the
presentation content.

Key Elements of the Presentation:

Executive Summary: A brief overview of the change process and its purpose.
 Risk Analysis Results: Detailed findings from the risk evaluation.

Impact Analysis Summary: Key points from the change impact review.

Recommendations: Clear and actionable steps for future improvement.

Media Review: Ensure that the presentation format is engaging, using visuals such as graphs and charts to
illustrate key points effectively.

CONCLUSION

Throughout the analysis of GreenFuture Energy Solutions' change management process, we explored various
models and frameworks, implementation strategies, monitoring tools, risk assessment methods, and
communication techniques. Key takeaways include the importance of selecting adaptable and comprehensive
change models like Lewin's Change Management Model and Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model, tailored to both the
organizational and individual levels. Effective monitoring and risk management, using tools like the Balanced
Scorecard and Enterprise Risk Management, are crucial in navigating the dynamic landscape of the renewable
energy sector. Additionally, the formation of a Delphi group emphasized the value of collaborative and expert-
driven analysis in assessing change impact. The development of a PowerPoint presentation for stakeholders
signifies the necessity of clear communication in ensuring understanding and support for strategic changes.
Overall, the blend of these approaches positions GreenFuture Energy Solutions to not only manage its current
period of change effectively but also to harness these transitions as opportunities for innovation and market
leadership in the renewable energy sector.

REFERENCES:
Amendolagine, V., Lema, R., & Rabellotti, R. (2021). Green foreign direct investments and the deepening of
capabilities for sustainable innovation in multinationals: Insights from renewable energy. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127381

Baloh, J., Zhu, X., & Ward, M. M. (2018). Implementing team huddles in small rural hospitals: How does the Kotter
model of change apply? Journal of Nursing Management, 26(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12584

Bloor, M., Sampson, H., & Dahlgren, K. (2013). Useful but no Oracle: reflections on the use of a Delphi Group in a
multi-methods policy research study. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1177/1468794113504103, 15(1), 57–70.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113504103

Carney, M. (2002). The management of change: using a model to evaluate the change process. Seminars for Nurse
Managers.

Chmielewska, M., Stokwiszewski, J., Markowska, J., & Hermanowski, T. (2022). Evaluating Organizational
Performance of Public Hospitals using the McKinsey 7-S Framework. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07402-3

Clarke, A., & Garside, J. (1997). The development of a best practice model for change management. European
Management Journal, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(97)00033-9
Cork, A. (2005). A model for successful change management. Nursing Standard, 19(25), 40–42.
https://doi.org/10.7748/NS2005.03.19.25.40.C3815

Gathungu, Dr. J. M. ., & Nyang’au, J. N. (2018). Application of Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Tool, Change
Management and Performance of Commercial Banks Listed in the Nairobi Securities Exchange in Kenya.
International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.30845/ijbht.v8n3p1

GÜREL, E. (2017). SWOT ANALYSIS: A THEORETICAL REVIEW. Journal of International Social Research,
10(51). https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2017.1832

Kennett-Hensel, P. A., & Payne, D. M. (2018). Guiding Principles for Ethical Change Management. Journal of
Business and Management, 24(2), 19–45. https://doi.org/10.6347/JBM.201809_24(2).0002

Kernan, W. D., Basch, C. H., & Cadorett, V. (2018). Using Mind Mapping to Identify Research Topics: A Lesson for
Teaching Research Methods. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2373379917719729

Lauer, T. (2021). A Success Factor Model of Change Management. In Change Management.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62187-5_5

Leksono, A., & Yulianti, P. (2022). Analysis of Effectiveness of Change of Training Program with Adkar Approach
(Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability and Reinforcement). Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani, 2(10).
https://doi.org/10.55927/mudima.v2i10.1563

Mohamadi, F. (2021). Quantitative Evaluation of Renewable Energy Projects. In Introduction to Project Finance in
Renewable Energy Infrastructure. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68740-3_12

Salviano, C. F. (2009). A Multi-model Process Improvement Methodology Driven by Capability Profiles. 2009 33rd
Annual IEEE International Computer Software and Applications Conference, 1, 636–637.
https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2009.94

Setiawan, I., & Purba, H. (2020). A Systematic Literature Review of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
Implementation. https://doi.org/10.7777/JIEMAR.V1I3.79

Suganthalakshmi, T., & Muthuvelayutham, C. (2011). Prosci’s change management for mixing of individual change
management and organizational change management to ensure the achievement in business. Asian Journal of
Research in Social Sciences and Humanities.

Van Hau, T. T., & Kuzic, J. (2010). Change management strategies for the successful implementation of enterprise
resource planning systems. Proceedings - 2nd International Conference on Knowledge and Systems
Engineering, KSE 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/KSE.2010.10

Varadarajan, R. (2017). Innovating for sustainability: a framework for sustainable innovations and a model of
sustainable innovations orientation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(1).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0461-6

Wing, L., & Jin, Z. (2015). Risk Management Methods Applied to Renewable and Sustainable Energy: A Review.
Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/J.JEEE.S.2015030101.11